Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI), commonly referred to as “a concussion,” is an injury that frequently occurs in contact sports, such as football. Sport-related brain injuries have been estimated to occur 1.6 to 3.8 million times every year. Additionally, it is estimated that some football players receive up to 1,500 head impacts per season. Although every impact may not result in MTBI, numerous impacts to the head can result in long-term brain damage through an impact induced neurodegenerative disease known as Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE).
The present disclosure provides various embodiments of shock wave mitigating helmets.
One embodiment, among others, is a helmet that comprises a shell having a first portion and a second portion. The first portion comprises a first layer, a second layer, and a third layer, wherein the second layer is positioned between the first layer and the third layer and wherein the second layer is less dense than the first layer and the third layer. The second portion of the shell comprises a plurality of energy dissipaters mounted within the second portion of the shell. Each of the energy dissipaters has a rod that extends in a spiraling manner from a fixed end to a free end. The rod tapers continuously along its length from the fixed end to the free end so that the fixed end exhibits a larger internal cross sectional area than the free end. The free end is capable of vibrating when the helmet is impacted by an object in order to dissipate impact energy.
Another embodiment, among others, is a helmet that comprises a shell having a first layer, a second layer, and a plurality of energy dissipaters positioned between the first layer and the second layer. Each of the energy dissipaters has a rod that extends in a spiraling manner from a fixed end to a free end. The rod tapers continuously along its length from the fixed end to the free end so that the fixed end exhibits a larger internal cross sectional area than the free end. The free end is capable of vibrating when the helmet is impacted by an object in order to dissipate impact energy.
Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, with emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The present disclosure relates to helmets that protect a wearer's head and reduce the likelihood of the wearer experiencing Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI), Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), or other types of injuries. The helmet in some embodiments comprises a shell that has a first portion and a second portion. The first portion of the shell may include a core layer that is surrounded by layers that are denser than the core layer. For example, the core layer may be constructed of a foam, and the surrounding layers may be constructed of a para-aramid synthetic fiber, such as a KEVLAR fiber, fixed in a matrix. Because the core layer is less dense than the surrounding layers, the first portion of the shell may mitigate shock waves that are imparted to the helmet.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, a suture may be formed in one of the layers that surrounds the core layer. An elastomeric adhesive may be disposed in the suture to hold portions of the layer together. The suture and elastomeric adhesive may also mitigate shock waves that are imparted to the helmet.
In addition, the second portion of the shell may include multiple energy dissipaters, such as elastomeric tapered spirals. The energy dissipaters may be configured to dissipate energy imparted to the helmet. In particular, the energy dissipaters may dissipate energy through shear action in the energy dissipaters.
Thus, various embodiments of the helmets described herein may mitigate shock waves, trap momentum, and dissipate energy so that the risk of wears experiencing injuries, such as MTBI and CTE, are reduced. In the following discussion, a general description of the system and its components is provided, followed by a discussion of the operation of the same.
With reference to
The helmet 100 may comprise a shell 103, a facemask 106, a liner (not shown), and/or other components. The shell 103 may be the outermost portion of the helmet 100 that surrounds at least a portion of the wear's head. Accordingly, the exterior surface of the shell 103 may contact objects, such as other helmets 100, when in use. The facemask 106 may protect the face of the wearer of the helmet 100.
With reference to
For the configuration illustrated in
The second portion 206 of the shell 103 may include a side layer 219, a plurality of energy dissipaters 223, and a plurality of support columns 226a-226c. In some embodiments, the side layer 219 may comprise a para-aramid synthetic fiber, such as a KEVLAR, carbon, E-glass, or S-glass fiber, fixed in a matrix, such as a polypropylene, polyurethane, polycarbonate, and/or any other suitable matrix.
The support columns 226a-226c may attach the side layer 219 to the first portion 203 of the shell 103. For the embodiments illustrated in
The energy dissipaters 223 are configured to dissipate energy that is imparted to the helmet 100. In some embodiments, energy dissipaters 223 may dissipate energy by a shearing action in the energy dissipater 223. Examples of energy dissipaters 223 are described in further detail below. In some embodiments, the energy dissipaters 223 may be arranged in rows throughout at least a portion of the shell 103, as illustrated in
With reference to
In particular, a suture 303 may exist between the first surrounding layer portion 213a and the second surrounding layer portion 213b. The suture 303 may be regarded as being a relatively rigid joint between the first surrounding layer portion 213a and the second surrounding layer portion 213b. In some embodiments, the suture 303 may extend around the entire shell 103. In other embodiments, the suture 303 may extend around only a portion of the shell 103. The suture 303 may comprise an elastomeric adhesive. In addition to attaching the first surrounding layer portion 213a to the second surrounding layer portion 213b, the elastomeric adhesive may facilitate shear deformation in the first surrounding layer 213 when the helmet 100 is subjected to an impact.
The suture 303 may have a sinusoidal shape that is curved to conform to the shape of the shell 103. In these embodiments, the ratio of the amplitude to the wavelength may be within the range from about 0.25 to about 2.0.
With reference to
The energy dissipater 223 illustrated in
The base 403 of the energy dissipater 223 may be attached directly to the second surrounding layer 216 of the first portion 203 of the shell 103. When the helmet 100 is subjected to an impact, energy may be transferred to the energy dissipater 223 and dissipated through shear action in the energy dissipater 223.
With reference to
The base 403b of the energy dissipater 223b may be attached directly to the second surrounding layer 216 of the first portion 203 of the shell 103. When the helmet 100 is subjected to an impact, energy may be transferred to the energy dissipater 223b and dissipated through shear action in the energy dissipater 223b. In the various embodiments, the rod of the energy dissipaters extends from a fixed end to a free end and extends toward the user when the helmet is worn.
With reference to
The base 403b of the energy dissipater 223b may be attached directly to the second surrounding layer 216 of the first portion 203 of the shell 103. When the helmet 100 is subjected to an impact, energy may be transferred to the energy dissipater 223b and dissipated through shear action in the energy dissipater 223b.
Numerical values may be expressed herein in a range format. Such a range format is used for convenience and brevity, and thus, should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. To illustrate, a concentration range of “about 0.1% to about 5%” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited concentration of about 0.1 wt % to about 5 wt %, but also include individual concentrations (e.g., 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (e.g., 0.5%, 1.1%, 2.2%, 3.3%, and 4.4%) within the indicated range. The term “about” may include traditional rounding according to significant figures of the numerical value.
The above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are merely examples of implementations to set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure. Disjunctive language used herein, such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, or Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is used in general to present that an item, term, etc., may be either X, Y, or Z, or any combination thereof (e.g., X, Y, and/or Z). Thus, such disjunctive language is not generally intended to, and should not, imply that certain embodiments require at least one of X, at least one of Y, or at least one of Z to each be present.
The present application is a non-provisional application of, and claims priority to, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/983,133, filed on Apr. 23, 2014 and titled “Shock-Wave Mitigating Bio-Inspired Football Helmet Design,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4111407 | Stager | Sep 1978 | A |
4292702 | Phillips | Oct 1981 | A |
5687426 | Sperber | Nov 1997 | A |
6276255 | Field et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6378140 | Abraham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
9179727 | Grant | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20030217483 | Abraham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060059605 | Ferrara | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20110227353 | Nagwanshi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130185837 | Phipps | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Bartoli, Ivan, et al., “Modeling Wave Propagation in Damped Waveguides of Arbitrary Cross-Section”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 295 (2006) pp. 685-707. |
Treyssede, Fabien, “Elastic Waves in Helical Waveguides”, Wave Motion 45 (2008), pp, 457-470. |
Snively, Eric, et al.; “Common Functional Correlates of Head-Strike Vehavior in the Pachycephalosaur Stegorceras validum (Ornithiochia, Dinosauria) and Combative Artiodactyls”, PLos One, vol. 6, Issue 6, Jun. 2011, pp. 1-26. |
Setchell, Robert E. et al.. “An Investigation of Shock Strengthening in a Conical Convergent Channel”, J. Fluid Mech. (1972), vol. 56, part 3, pp. 505-522. |
Munch, E., et al, Tough, Bio-Inspired Hybrid materials, Science, vol. 322, Dec. 5, 2008, pp. 1516-1520. |
Yoon; Sang-Hee, et al., “A Mechanical Analysis of Woodpecker Drumming and It's Application to Chock-Absorbing Systems”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetrics, vol. 6, (2011), pp. 1-12. |
Ressl, Marc. S., et al. “Design of an Acoustic Anechoic Chamber for Application in Hearing Aid Research”, Recent Advances in Acoustics & Music, Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on Acoustics & Music: Theory & Applications (AMTA '10), Jun. 2010. |
Willinger, Remy, et al. “Three-Dimensional Human Head Finite-Element Model Validation Against Two Experimental Impacts”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 403-410, 1999. |
Oda, Juhachi, et al., “Mechanical Evaluation of the Skeletal Structure and Tissue of the Woodpecker and It's Shock Absorbing System”, JSME International Journal, Series A, vol. 49, No. 3, 2006, pp. 390-396. |
Mohammed, Javeed Shaikh, et al., “Bioinspired Design of Dynamic Materials”, Adv. Mater, 2009, 21, pp. 2361-2374. |
Maity, Parimal, et al., “Finite Element of Ramming in Ovis Canadensis”, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 133, Feb. 2011, pp. 021009-1 to 021009-9. |
Mace, Brian R., et al., “Finite Element Prediction of Wave Motion in Structural Waveguides”, J. Acoust. Soc, Am., vol. 117, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 2836-2842. |
Hayashi, Takahiro, et al., “Guided Wave Dispersion Curves for a Bar with an Arbitrary Cross-Section, a Rod and Rail Example”, Ultrasonics, vol. 41, 2003, pp. 175-183. |
Bond, C., “Shock Focusing in a Planar Convergent Geometry: Experiment and Simulation”, J. Fluid Mech (2009), vol. 641, pp. 297-333. |
Gavric, L., “Computation of propagative Waves in Free Rail Using a Finite Element Technique”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, (1995), vol. 185(3), pp. 531-543. |
Demma, A., “The Effect of Bends on the Propagation of Guided Waves in Pipes”, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 127, Aug. 2005, pp. 328-335. |
Shergold, Oliver A., et al., “The Uniaxial Stress Versus Strain Response of Pig Skin and Silicone Rubber at Low and High Strain Rates”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 1384-1402, 2006. |
Farke, Andrew A., “Frontal Sinuses and Head-Butting in Goats: A finite Element Analysis”, The Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 211, pp. 3085-3094, 2008. |
Trim, Michael W., “The Effects of Water and Microstructure on the Mechanical Properties of Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis) Horn Keratin”, Acta Biomaterialia. vol. 7, pp. 1228-1240, 2011. |
Chafi, M.S., et al., “Biomechanical Assessment of Brain Dynamic Responses Due to Blast Pressure Waves”, Annals of biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, No. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 490-504. |
Tombolato, Luca, et al., “Microstructure, Elastic Properties and Deformation mechanisms of Horn Keratin”, Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 6, pp. 319-330, 2010. |
Frikha, Ahmed, et al., “Effect of Axial Load on the Propagation of Elastic Waves in Helical Beams”, Wave Motion, vol. 48, pp. 83-92, 2011. |
Bright, Jen A., “Sensitivity and Ex Vivo Validation of Finite Element Models of the Domestic Pig Cranium”, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 219, pp. 456-471, 2010. |
Hogg, D.A., “The Development of Pneumatisation in the Postcranial Skeleton of the Domestic Fowl”, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 139, pp. 105-113, 1984. |
Bioon, Auditory and Vestibular Pathways, http://www.bioon.com/bioline/neurosci/course/audvest.html, accessed Jul. 7, 2015. |
National Wildlife Foundation, Bighorn Sheep, accessed Sep. 10, 2014, http://www.nwf.org/wildlife/wildelife˜libary/mammals/bighorn-sheep.aspx. |
Merck, Ears, Accessed Sep. 10, 2014, http://merckmanuals.com/home/ear—nose—and—throat—disorders/biology-of—the—ears—nose—and—throat/ears.html. |
Roymech, Helical Sprin Design, archived Feb. 22, 2007, http://roymech.co.uk/Useful—Tables/Springs—helical.html#Rectangular. |
“Vibration,” Dictionary.com, accessed Feb. 24, 2016, http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vibration. |
“NASA,” “Numerical Simulation of Flow Past a Tapered Cylinder,” AIAA Paper 91-0751, 1991. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150305427 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61983133 | Apr 2014 | US |