The invention will be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference to
At the opposite end of the applicator 2 is an applicator head portion 40 as shown the applicator head portion 40 has a rounded contour with a diameter of approximately 5 cm, preferably smaller which enables the device to be easily positioned around or under the organ to be treated. It is in this portion 40 that the shock wave patterns are produced, reflected and emitted to the organ or tissue 100 being treated. The head portion 40 includes a reflector cover 3 which is sealed and retained by the annular fixation ring 4 which secures and holds the reflector cover 3. The reflector cover 3 is made of a flexible silicone membrane or alternatively or a hard plastic shell of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane or similar material to provide additional protection from cracks. The entire device is then hermetically sealed in an outer skin membrane 5 of silicone or other energy absorbing and insulating material having a thickness of 0.2 mm or greater. Preferably the coating extends beyond the cable connectors 32, 33 and along a length of at least 20 cm or more of the cable 1.
With reference to
An alternative to the fixed electrode tips 11, 13 is to provide an upgraded device with an adjustable tip wherein the spark gap can be maintained during use, this upgrade device shown in
A cavity 30 is formed between the reflector cover 3 and the reflector 15 which is filled with a fluid medium preferably filled with water. The water helps create a cavitation bubble when the spark is generated from which a shock wave 200 is propagated outward to the tissue or organ 100 to be treated.
It is possible to reduce the size of the applicator head 40 from about 5 cm maximum to much smaller almost half that size by reducing the volume in the cavity 30 and the size of the reflector 15. This can be accomplished by applying over pressure to the volume around the tips 11, 13 of the electrode to control the size of the emitted shock wave bubble. The size of the bubble will increase with the energy and this over pressure put on the tips 11, 13 of the electrode enables the wave propagation to be effectively the same as in the larger sized reflector head.
With reference to
As further shown the activation of the shock wave head 40 can be triggered by the surgeon by depressing the switch button 42 which closes the switch 46 allowing the high voltage current to pass along the cable or rod 8. Preferably this switch 46 including the switch button 42 is sealed within the housing 16 and the housing 16 can be squeezed to depress the switch button 42. This minimizes the protruding portions on the device 2 which is important to avoid damaging vessels or nerves on insertion of the device 2 into the access portal provided by the surgical procedure. The switch 46 could also be replaced with a foot switch or a switch attached to the power and control unit 41.
As can easily be appreciated the use of high voltage electricity passing through the cable 1 along with input and output water lines 17, 18 creates a serious need for internal and external insulation of the device 2. The fact that the device further is coupled to a patient's exposed organ via a coupling gel means the electrical conductive path to the organ is both well grounded and provides virtually no resistance to electrical leakage. Such leakage could trigger a sudden stoppage of the heart or brain as stray electrical current passing through an exposed organ such as the brain or the heart could cause the organ to stop functioning and thus bring about sudden death. Accordingly to avoid such a risk the device is recommended for a one time use only after which it is discarded as the energy that the acoustic wave generates puts sizable loads on the components and as such repeated uses run a high risk of electric current or internal fluid leakage. Even with this precaution there is still a risk of leakage with a new device that can be virtually eliminated by the use of a device that is completely encapsulated in a hermetically sealed outer sheath covering or skin membrane 5. In practice it has been discovered that the entire shock wave applicator device 2 can be sealed in a silicone rubber or other insulating type elastomer such as polyurethane rubber such that the entire housing including the cable connectors 32, 33 and at least a portion length of the cable 1 is hermetically sealed, isolated and insulated from the patient. Not only does this reduce the risk of electrical leakage it also insures no internal fluid leakage from the device can leak into the surgical site which could lead to infection. Secondarily the device having such an insulating outer skin 5 provides an outer surface that is far less prone to injure the tissue or the organ being treated as the device is manipulated.
A secondary benefit of such a compliant skin like membrane 5 is the fact that external sterilization is sufficient to insure the device is safe for use. As a result a gas sterilization of the device will germicidally kill any surface bacteria on the insulating skin membrane 5 and therefore the device can be packaged in a sterile paper package or plastic package and be brought to the operating room for attachment to the generator control and power supply 41 without concerns of surface contamination if properly aseptically handled.
Alternatively other means of sterilization are possible such as gamma radiation, ultra violet and steam sterilization. As a secondary precaution the device can be aseptically wiped down with germicidal agents or ultrasonically cleaned and then placed in a sterile sleeve prior to use as shown in
With reference to
A noticeable alternative barrier improvement in the reflector cover 3 region where the acoustic wave transmission passes through the reflector cover 3 can be achieved by substituting the flexible lens cover 3 with a hard plastic of polyethylene or high shore hardness polyurethane which is virtually invisible to the wave propagation of the acoustic shock wave pattern.
In any event it has been found that a dip coating of at least 0.2 mm or greater, 0.2 mm being optimal for providing a sufficiently thick barrier without impeding the transmission of the shock waves. Naturally thicker coatings on the housing are permissible and away from the reflector cover 3 wave transmission path thicker coatings can be desirable.
As shown in
When treating an organ such as the heart the transmission of the shock waves can be triggered such that the shockwave pulse is emitted at a time when the heart is contracting. As is well known and observed in electro cardio graphs, ECG's, the heart transmits a repetitive beat or wave form often described as the QRS and T wave. The R portion of the curves includes the peak of the curve and it occurs during a heart contraction and during the contraction the heart is in a vironlevel phase such that the heart beat pattern cannot be altered during a triggering of the shockwave pulse. Accordingly it is preferred in sensitive patients that the shockwaves are transmitted during the R phase of QRS and T curves. To stimulate at other times during the heartbeat can create an alteration of the repetitive pattern of the heartbeat and could trigger an irregular and uncontrolled heart spasm which can easily be avoided by timing the shockwave pulse transmission to occur during the R curve portion of the heartbeat wave pattern. This method of controlling the transmission of the shockwave pulse can be tied to any number of repetitive body functions including, but not limited to pulse rate, pulmonary rate, breathing, brain wave activity or the like. The use of equipment monitoring devices to measure such body function can therefore be computer controlled to provide the necessary feedback to permit precise control of the triggering of the generator or shock wave source to insure a fully automated system wherein the temporal firing of the device is controlled without the need of the surgeon or physician intervention. A similar type technique of using the cardiac rhythm or pulse rate frequency of the patient was taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,313,954 to control the shockwave frequency of generation and the subject matter of that patent is being incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The advantage of such a technique is that it enables the determination of the frequency of extrasystoles such that the pulse generator can be deactivated for a given period of time to permit the patients circulation to regenerate itself during this interval. To do otherwise could induce irregular heart rates which in patients with weakened or damaged hearts is more problematic and potentially could be life threatening during the procedure of treatment. Accordingly in the case of treating the heart, in particular, such as the use of ECG gating to control the transmission or triggering of the shockwave pulse and the frequency of the pulse and the frequency of the pulse interval and dwell time between pulses is considered particularly important.
As shown the electrode tips 11, 13 spacing can be controlled by using the magnet 9 and the coil 10 which can move the inner tip 11 to control the gap spacing (S). Alternatively the tips 11, 13 can be replaced with adjustable electrodes using other means such as piezo ceramics, magnets, motors with gear boxes, pneumatic or hydraulic to change the tip distance.
The low cost alternative is to provide two fixed electrodes 11, 13 which are pre-set at fixed gaps and are not adjustable. In this way the entire device can be disposable adapted for a one procedure use which would provide the surgeon with a shock wave applicator device 2 capable to treat a single patient after which the device 2 can be simply discarded. This is possible due to the very low cost such a non-adjustable device 2 would require to manufacture. Alternatively any of the devices 2 can be easily refurbished by replacing worn components generally by removing the outer skin 5 and replacing the firing mechanisms such as the electrode or tips and re-dipping or molding a new outer skin 5 onto the housing to reseal the device.
In practice the use of the device 2 can be enhanced by the addition of a light and or miniature camera system (not shown) integrally attached at the head portion 40 or housing 16 of the applicator 2. The camera or light can be internal of the housing 16 and the housing can be or have a clear window portion for transmission. Preferably the light source is one or more LED's adapted for high light and low heat generation. The light and or viewing system combination can be connected to a remote optical monitor to enable the physician to focus on the rear of the organ being treated or any portion obstructed from view. Alternatively the surgeon may employ a flexible endoscope device to get light and a camera for viewing the treatment location and positioning the device 2.
The shock wave device preferably can be packaged in a sterile wrap or package and opened and connected aseptically in the operating room by the nurse or technical staff.
Alternatively and additionally as shown in
As shown in
The device 2 can be alternatively configured to provide a leakage detection system which will include a vacuum line 82 that passes through the cable 1 and is connected to a tubular connector 87 attached to an internal conduit 88 in the housing 16. The conduit 88 passes along the side of the housing 16 to an opening 89 adjacent to the reflector 3 but internal of the housing 16 such that any leakage from the cavity 30 of the fluid under pressure or any leakage of the patient's bodily fluids could be detected by a drop in vacuum pressure.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
These and other aspects of the reflector characteristics and the use of the shock wave head have been described in co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 11/238,731 portions of which are restated for a clear understanding of the method and use of the inventive device described above.
In the shock wave method of treating an organ of a mammal be it human or an animal with an at least partially exposed target site on the organ, the organ is positioned in a convenient orientation to permit the source of the emitted waves to most directly send the waves unobstructed to the target site to initiate shock wave stimulation of the target area with minimal, preferably no interfering tissue or bone features in the path of the emitting source or lens or reflector cover 3 or outer skin 5. Assuming the target area is within a projected area of the wave transmission, a single transmission dosage of wave energy may be used. The transmission dosage can be from a few seconds to 20 minutes or more dependent on the condition. The number of shock waves could be from 10 to a few hundred or a few thousand within one treatment. The repletion frequency of shock waves per second could be from 0.5-20 per second. Preferably the waves are generated from an unfocused or focused source. Preferably the shock waves should be emitted at maximum energy densities of about 0.3 mJ/mm2 or less. The unfocused waves can be divergent or near planar and having a low pressure amplitude and density in the range of 0.00001 mJ/mm2 to 0.3 mJ/mm2 or less, most typically below 0.2 mJ/mm2. The focused source preferably can use a diffusing lens or have a far-sight focus to minimize if not eliminate having the localized focus point within the tissue. Preferably the focused shock waves are used at a similarly effective low energy transmission or alternatively can be at higher energy but wherein the tissue target site is disposed pre-convergence inward of the geometric focal point of the emitted wave transmission.
These shock wave energy transmissions are effective in stimulating a cellular response and can be accomplished without creating the cavitation bubbles in the tissue of the target site. This effectively insures the organ does not have to experience the sensation of hemorrhaging so common in the higher energy focused wave forms having a focal point at or within the targeted treatment site. It is intended not to generate any cavitation bubbles, but it is recognized difficult to avoid them 100%. Accordingly the treatments discussed clearly can minimize such occurrences.
If the target site is an organ subjected to a surgical procedure exposing at least some if not all of the organ within the body cavity the target site may be such that the patient or the portable shock wave applicator device 2 must be reoriented relative to the site and a second, third or more treatment dosage can be administered. The fact that the dosage is at a low energy the common problem of localized hemorrhaging is reduced making it more practical to administer multiple dosages of waves from various orientations to further optimize the treatment and cellular stimulation of the target site. Heretofore focused high energy multiple treatments induced pain and discomfort to the patient. The use of low energy focused or un-focused waves at the target site enables multiple sequential treatments.
The present method does not rely on precise site location per se. The physician's general understanding of the anatomy of the patient should be sufficient to locate the target area to be treated. This is particularly true when the exposed organ is visually within the surgeon's line of sight and this permits the lens or reflector cover 3 of the emitting shock wave applicator 2 to impinge on the organ tissue directly during the shockwave treatment. The treated area can withstand a far greater number of shock waves based on the selected energy level being emitted. For example at very low energy levels the stimulation exposure can be provided over prolonged periods as much as 20 minutes if so desired. The number of shock waves could be from 10 to a few hundred or a few thousand within one treatment. The repletion frequency of shock waves per second could be from 0.5-20 per second. At higher energy levels the treatment duration can be shortened to less than a minute, less than a second if so desired. The limiting factor in the selected treatment dosage is avoidance or minimization of cell hemorrhaging and other kinds of damage to the cells or tissue while still providing a stimulating stem cell activation or a cellular release or activation of VEGF and other growth factors.
The underlying principle of these shock wave therapy methods is to stimulate the body's own natural healing capability. This is accomplished by deploying shock waves to stimulate strong cells in the tissue to activate a variety of responses. The acoustic shock waves transmit or trigger what appears to be a cellular communication throughout the entire anatomical structure, this activates a generalized cellular response at the treatment site, in particular, but more interestingly a systemic response in areas more removed from the wave form pattern. This is believed to be one of the reasons molecular stimulation can be conducted at threshold energies heretofore believed to be well below those commonly accepted as required. Accordingly not only can the energy intensity be reduced but also the number of applied shock wave impulses can be lowered from several thousand to as few as one or more pulses and still yield a beneficial stimulating response.
The use of shock waves as described above appears to involve factors such as thermal heating, light emission, electromagnetic field exposure, chemical releases in the cells as well as a microbiological response within the cells or intracellular. Which combination of these factors plays a role in stimulating healing is not yet resolved. However, there appears to be a commonality in the fact that growth factors are released which applicants find indicative that otherwise dormant cells within the tissue appear to be activated which leads to the remarkable ability of the targeted organ or tissue to generate new growth or to regenerate weakened vascular networks in for example the cardio vascular system.
The use of shock wave therapy requires a fundamental understanding of focused and unfocused shock waves, coupled with a more accurate biological or molecular Focused shock waves are focused using ellipsoidal reflectors in electromechanical sources from a cylindrical surface or by the use of concave or convex lenses. Piezoelectric sources often use spherical surfaces to emit acoustic pressure waves which are self focused and have also been used in spherical electromagnetic devices.
The biological model proposed by co-inventor Wolfgang Schaden provides a whole array of clinically significant uses of shock wave therapy.
Accepting the biological model as promoted by W. Schaden, the peak pressure and the energy density of the shock waves can be lowered dramatically. Activation of the body's healing mechanisms will be seen by in growth of new blood vessels and the release of growth factors.
The biological model motivated the design of sources with low pressure amplitudes and energy densities. First: spherical waves generated between two tips 11, 13 of an electrode; and second: nearly even waves generated by generalized parabolic reflectors. Third: divergent shock front characteristics are generated by an ellipsoid behind F2. Unfocused sources are preferably designed for extended two dimensional areas/volumes like skin. The unfocused sources can provide a divergent wave pattern or a nearly planar wave pattern and can be used in isolation or in combination with focused wave patterns yielding to an improved therapeutic treatment capability that is non-invasive with few if any disadvantageous contraindications. Alternatively a focused wave emitting treatment may be used wherein the focal point extends preferably beyond the target treatment site, potentially external to the patient. This results in the reduction of or elimination of a localized intensity zone with associated noticeable pain effect while providing a wide or enlarged treatment volume at a variety of depths more closely associated with high energy focused wave treatment. The utilization of a diffuser type lens or a shifted far-sighted focal point for the ellipsoidal reflector enables the spreading of the wave energy to effectively create a convergent but off target focal point. This insures less tissue trauma while insuring cellular stimulation to enhance the healing process. The device as shown has an ellipsoidal reflector that provides a generally focused beam. The device alternatively can be used or fitted to provide a variety of shock wave fronts. Some of which are discussed as follows.
This method of treatment has the steps of, locating a treatment site, generating either convergent diffused or far-sighted focused shock waves or unfocused shock waves, of directing these shock waves to the treatment site; and applying a sufficient number of these shock waves to induce activation of one or more growth factors thereby inducing or accelerating healing.
The unfocused shock waves can be of a divergent wave pattern or near planar pattern preferably of a low peak pressure amplitude and density. Typically the energy density values range as low as 0.000001 mJ/mm2 and having a high end energy density of below 1.0 mJ/mm2, preferably 0.20 mJ/mm2 or less. The peak pressure amplitude of the positive part of the cycle should be above 1.0 and its duration is below 1-3 microseconds.
The treatment depth can vary from the surface to the full depth of the treated organ. The treatment site can be defined by a much larger treatment area than the 0.10-3.0 cm2 commonly produced by focused waves. The above methodology is particularly well suited for surface as well as sub-surface soft tissue organ treatments.
The above methodology is valuable in generation of tissue, vascularization and may be used in combination with stem cell therapies as well as regeneration of tissue and vascularization.
The methodology is useful in (re)vascularization of the heart, brain, liver, kidney and skin.
The methodology is useful in stimulating enforcement of defense mechanisms in tissue cells to fight infections from bacteria and can be used germicidally to treat or cleanse wounds or other target sites.
Conditions caused by cirrhosis of the liver can be treated by reversing this degenerative condition.
The implications of using the (re)generative features of this type of shock wave therapy are any weakened organ or tissue even bone can be strengthened to the point of reducing or eliminating the risk of irreparable damage or failure.
The stimulation of growth factors and activation of healing acceleration is particularly valuable to elderly patients and other high risk factor subjects.
Similar gains are visualized in organ transplant and complete organ regeneration, wherein a heart, liver, kidney, portions of the brain or any other organ or portions thereof of a human or animal may be transplanted into a patient, the organ being exposed to shock waves either prior to or after being transplanted.
With reference to
With reference to
In
In
In each of the representative treatments as shown in
In
Heretofore such invasive techniques were not used in combination with shock wave therapy primarily because the shockwaves were believed to be able to sufficiently pass through interfering body tissue to achieve the desired result in a non-invasive fashion. While this may be true, in many cases if the degenerative process is such that an operation is required then the combination of an operation in conjunction with shockwave therapy only enhances the therapeutic values and the healing process of the patient and the organ such that regenerative conditions can be achieved that would include not only revascularization of the heart or other organs wherein sufficient or insufficient blood flow is occurring but also to enhance the improvement of ischemic tissue that may be occupying a portion of the organ. This ischemic tissue can then be minimized by the regenerative process of using shock wave therapy in the fashion described above to permit the tissue to rebuild itself in the region that has been afflicted.
As used throughout this application wherein the use of exemplary shock waves 200 in an unobstructed path has been described unobstructed path means that there is no or substantially no interfering tissue or bone skeletal mass between the shock wave applicator 2 and the treated organ. It is believed that the elimination of such interfering masses greatly enhances the control and the efficiency of the emitted exemplary shock waves 200 to create the desired beneficial healing effects and regenerative process needed for the organ to be repaired.
Furthermore such acoustic shock wave forms can be used in combination with drugs, chemical treatments, irradiation therapy or even physical therapy and when so combined the stimulated cells will more rapidly assist the body's natural healing response.
The present invention provides an apparatus for an effective treatment of indications, which can benefit from low energy pressure pulse/shock waves having nearly plane or even divergent characteristics. With an unfocused wave having nearly plane wave characteristic or even divergent wave characteristics, the energy density of the wave may be or may be adjusted to be so low that side effects including pain are very minor or even do not exist at all. The use of the focus shock wave beams while generally employed at a higher energy pressure density are also beneficially useable in this type of open or accessible organ treatment and can be accomplished with minimal occurrence of hemorrhaging if properly conducted.
In certain embodiments, the apparatus of the present invention is able to produce waves having energy density values that are below 0.3 mJ/mm2 or even as low as 0.000 001 mJ/mm2. In a preferred embodiment, those low end values range between 0.1-0.001 mJ/mm2. With these low energy densities, side effects are reduced and the dose application is much more uniform. Additionally, the possibility of harming surface tissue is reduced when using an apparatus of the present invention that generates waves having nearly plane or divergent characteristics and larger transmission areas compared to apparatuses using a focused shock wave source that need to be moved around to cover the affected area. The apparatus of the present invention also may allow the user to make more precise energy density adjustments than an apparatus generating only focused shock waves, which is generally limited in terms of lowering the energy output.
The treatment of the above mentioned indications are believed to be a first time use of acoustic shock wave therapy invasively. None of the work done to date has treated the above mentioned indications with convergent, divergent, planar or near-planar acoustic shock waves of low energy or focused shock waves in a direct unobstructed path from the emitting source lens or cover using the soft fluid filled organ as a transmitting medium directly. As is the use of acoustic shock waves for germicidal wound cleaning or preventive medical treatments.
With reference to
This converging wave pattern 200A is commonly used in focused shock wave treatments wherein the focal point F2 is targeted at a specific point in the tissue mass 100. Alternatively the wave pattern can be used off target to avoid the high energy focal region if so desired. These wave patterns 200A are most commonly produced by using an ellipsoidal shaped reflector surface in the cavity 30.
Various wave patterns 200A-200E are by no means intended to be more than exemplary and any such wave pattern or type may be used at the surgeon's discretion. Accordingly the depiction 200 in
It will be appreciated that the apparatuses and processes of the present invention can have a variety of embodiments, only a few of which are disclosed herein. It will be apparent to the artisan that other embodiments exist and do not depart from the spirit of the invention. Thus, the described embodiments are illustrative and should not be construed as restrictive.
Variations in the present invention are possible in light of the description of it provided herein. While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for the purpose of illustrating the subject invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the subject invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that changes can be made in the particular embodiments described which will be within the full intended scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation in part and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/763,018 filed on Jan. 27, 2006 entitled “Shock Wave Treatment and Method of Use” and also claims priority to U.S. Ser. No. 11/422,388 filed on Jun. 6, 2006 entitled “Shock Wave Treatment Device and Method of Use”.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60763018 | Jan 2006 | US |