The present invention relates to a shock wave apparatus for treating the human or animal body by mechanical shockwaves.
Such apparatuses are known as such, in particular in the area of lithotripsy. There, body concrements, in particular stones in the body tissue, are disintegrated by focused mechanical shockwaves. Besides the production by electrical discharges in water, also apparatuses have been developed producing the mechanical shockwaves by the collision of an accelerated projectile and an impact body and coupling said shockwaves into body tissue by means of said impact body. Such apparatuses have been used also in lithotripsy by a direct contact between the impact body or a probe connected to the impact body and the stone, and in other treatments of biological body substances. In particular, the treatment of muscle diseases and of diseases in the transition region between muscles and bones are to be named.
A pneumatic implementation of the drive of the projectile is principally known, for example from DE 20 2004 011 323 U1. A compressor compresses for example air as a pressure gas to be used for accelerating the projectile in a guiding tube. The compressor has a motor, usually an electric motor. The compressor and its motor are steadily operated during use in the prior art.
The present invention has the object to improve a shockwave apparatus of the above described type with regard to its properties of use in terms of the compressor operation.
Here to, the invention is directed to a shockwave apparatus for treating a human or animal body having a pneumatic drive for producing a shockwave to be coupled into said body and a compressor of said pneumatic drive for producing pressure gas, said compressor comprising a compressor motor, characterized in that the rotation rate of said compressor motor is adjustable for setting a gas pressure for producing said shockwave.
Preferred embodiments of the apparatus according to the invention and its use are defined in the dependent claims. The features comprised therein and the disclosure of the following description are to be understood in view of both categories of the invention without any explicit differentiation there between herein.
The basic idea of the invention is to be able to adjust the motor rotation rate of the compressor motor, namely by the user and not only in the production. The shockwave apparatus thus comprisses a device for adjusting this rotation rate or for manipulating the rotation rate. By means of the rotation rate adjustment, the pressure producing the shockwave shall be manipulated and thus the intensity of the individual impact process. The device can also be designated as a device for adjusting the pressure, the pulse energy or the like.
In contrast thereto, steadily running compressor motors are used in the prior art and the pressures are predetermined by adjusting pressure reducing valves at the output side of the compressors. This has the advantage to be able to work with simple motor controllers. However, the inventors have found substantial disadvantages.
For example, a pressure reducing valve principally needs a minimal pressure difference. The conventional compressor thus has to produce a higher pressure than needed even in case of a maximum adjustment of the pressure. This is the reason for noise, power consumption and, in the design of the apparatus, a somewhat bigger power class of the compressor.
This applies even more to the very frequent case that a smaller pressure than the maximal possible pressure is desired. In such cases, a correspondingly larger difference pressure is discharged to the environment so that the compressor causes noise and consumes energy at an unnecessary level. Further, the pressure reducing valve or a pressure regulating means that has been necessary in the prior art can be omitted.
A use of a feedback control circuit for a feedback control of the pressure by the motor rotation rate is preferred, in particular including a PID feedback control circuit (proportional, integral, differential feedback control circuit). Therein, for example the output pressure of the compressor is detected as a feedback value and is feedback controlled by manipulating the motor rotation rate as a manipulated variable to a target value.
A practical and economic implementation of the feedback control circuit provides a feedback control implemented as software. The software can run for example on a micro-controller or more generally spoken, on a programmable integrated circuit. Here, but also in a hardware implementation of the feedback control circuit, a so called one-quadrant feedback control is preferred, i.e. a feedback control operating with positive feedback deviations only. In the present case this means that the one-quadrant feedback control is in control operation only for smaller target values than the feedback value and that the motor is switched off in the opposite case.
Further, the shockwave apparatus according to the invention preferably comprises a motor run-up current limiter, preferably implemented in software, and more preferably running on the same computer or programmable device. This run-up current limiter can be a PI feedback control circuit (proportional integral feedback control circuit), in particular.
The motor output portion feeding the compressor motor, for example a half bridge, is preferably driven by a pulse width modulation method, i.e. by a PWM control. In this context, a limitation of the PWM pulses both with regard to the positive and to the negative amplitudes is preferred as explained along the exemplary embodiment.
A particularly simple and practical implementation of the compressor is an air-cooled compressor. Although such compressors are louder than oil-cooled compressors, they are substantially lighter and thus easier to be transported. In this invention, the increased noise levels can be reduced and thus can be kept in an acceptable range. Further, a part of the elements of the shockwave apparatus is preferably implemented in a hand device and is thus adapted to be held by the hand of the user, said hand device being connected to a stationary base station by a supply line, in particular a pneumatic line. Naturally, the base station can be displaceable or can be carried along, however, it is stationary during operation in a regular case. In particular the compressor is located here.
The prior art cited in the beginning uses a projectile to be accelerated by the pressure gas. Such an embodiment is preferred in this invention as well but is not mandatory.
Preferably, the projectile can be moved along a guiding tube and produces the shockwave by an impact at an end of the guiding tube. The guiding tube thus serves as an acceleration path.
Further, the invention is directed to shockwave apparatus comprising impact bodies or transfer elements, i.e. such solid bodies that are arranged at a distal end or impact-side end of the guiding tube and serve for an impact of the projectile. Such impact bodies are placed onto the body to be treated directly or indirectly and can couple energy into the body by an elastic wave and by an macroscopic movement of the impact body. In this regard, reference is made to the utility model already cited.
Principally, projectiles can also be used without a linear guiding tube. For illustration, reference is made to DE 10 2006 057 268 in which projectiles running along a circular path are described.
Further, the projectile can be omitted completely and a pneumatic pressure gas front can hit the impact body directly. For illustration, reference is made to DE 20 2007 007 921.
Finally, it is possible to use a projectile but no impact body. The projectile can collide with the body surface to be treated directly at the end of its movement path, as an example.
As a last remark, in principle modifications are feasible in which a pressure gas front hits the body surface directly although such embodiments are not preferred.
Preferred applications relate to soft tissue, in particular muscles and muscle-bases, acupuncture, enthesis treatment, trigger point therapy.
Hereunder, the invention will be explained in more detail along an exemplary embodiment, wherein the individual features thereof can also be important in other combinations and relate, as already mentioned, to all categories of the invention, implicitly.
A casing 14 has a proximal terminal cap 16 and a distal terminal cap 18 being removable respectively. A guiding tube 24 is held in the casing and is arranged axially and concentrically. A projectile 20 is guided in the guiding tube, the movement path of which projectile along the interior of the guiding tube 24 being limited on the right side by an impact body 22, namely by its proximal side 30. This constitutes a distal abutment stop for the projectile 20 wherein the proximal abutment stop of the projectile 20 is designated by 28 and is a simple closure of the guiding tube 24. This closure is magnetic so that the projectile 20 can be fixed along by certain holding force. Typically, the length of the guiding tube 24 is about 5 cm-20 cm.
The pneumatic drive 32 implements the pressure gas supply device and comprises a common pneumatic compressor 34, wherein the compressor 34 has a typical operation range up to about 10 bar wherein only about up to 5 bar or up to 8 bar are needed. A pressure gas terminal 40 of the hand-piece 12 is supplied via a pressure conduit 36 and a switching valve 38, which terminal 40 communicates with the guiding tube 24 via the opening 42 therein. The switching valve 38 can be a magnetic valve. A control 44 is connected thereto via a control line 46 being illustrated by a hatched line. The control 44 can be implemented as a structural unit with the compressor 34 and thus constitute a basic device for supplying the hand-piece 12 wherein the switching valve 38 is advantageously arranged at the latter. Correspondingly, the control 44 and the compressor 34 in
Two adjustment buttons 58 and 60 are provided on the control 44 whereby the supply pressure provided by the conduit 36 and the operation frequency of the switching valve 38 can be set. The adjustment button 58 serves for adjusting the pressure out-put of the compressor 34, namely by a target value setting for a PID feedback control circuit in the control 44 being explained in more detail hereunder. Hereto the control 44 is connected to the compressor 34 by a line shown.
Further, the control 44 is adapted to control the switching valve 38 with a frequency set at the adjustment button 60 in a range of 0 Hz-50 Hz.
Before a more detailed explanation of the control 44, the working method of the apparatus in
Starting from a non-operating condition of the apparatus 10, i.e. at the start of operation, the closed switching valve 38 is opened by the control 44. The condition shown in
The PID element consists of a proportional element having the symbol Kp and the reference B10, an integrating element Ki having the reference B11 and a differentiating element Kd having the reference B12. They are connected in parallel as usual and process a control difference in an individual and adjustable manner, respectively.
Their outputs are added and transformed in a manner not shown for manipulating a PWM control signal of a PWM control known as such of motor output portion. The PWM control signal is limited by a limiter B13 to a range of operation of the control between a maximum and a minimum value and supplied to the motor output portion B14, namely a PWM controlled transistor half bridge. The output current of the motor output portion B14 passes a current detector element S4 for than driving the already mentioned motor M2 of the compressor 34.
In the present embodiment, the motor M2 is a direct current motor. Further, the compressor 34 works along the membrane principle. Thus, the compressor produces pressure in both rotational senses of the motor. Consequently, the PID feedback control can be limited to a quadrant, i.e. to values of only one polarity, because with opposite polarity, only a symmetric situation would result. Thus, the PWM controlled transistor half bridge can be constructed particularly simple. The pulse duty factor of the pulse with modulated control corresponds to the motor voltage therein.
Naturally, also an alternating current motor and a converter could be used wherein the motor would be controlled by the frequence instead of the voltage. Similarly, synchronous motors and asynchronous motors are contemplated. Respective alternative embodiments of the invention are clear to the skilled reader and detailed explanation can be omitted here.
The current feedback value detected in the current detection S4 element is used for a PI feedback control circuit for current limitation. Hereto, it is fed into a differentiating element and subtracted from a predetermined maximum value Imax therein. This maximum value Imax can be set during production and can be adapted to the respective motor used and its current supply. The difference is an input of a PI feedback control element known as such having a proportional element B15 and an integrating element B16, the outputs of which respond individually and adjustably to the feedback difference. They are added and fed into the differentiating element as already mentioned at the input of the limiter B13. However, this is done only if the current feedback value of the current detecting element S4 exceeds a certain threshold. Hereto, the latter is used as an input a of a comparator B17, the reference input b of which receives the current maximum value Imax already mentioned. In case of a negative difference, namely if the current detected is larger than the maximum allowed current, a switch B18 at the output of the adding element at the rear side of the PI-feedback control element B15, B16 is closed in order to guarantee a feedback control action of the PI-feedback control circuit and to limit the current to allowed values. In the other case, the PI-feedback control circuit remains open and without effect.
In the manner described right now, disadvantageously large run-up currents of the compressor motor M2 can be avoided. Such run-up currents appear at a start from a stillstand condition, in particular if the compressor motor works against a load. The latter condition can be a desired one, namely if the volume at the downstream side the compressor motor remains under pressure in a switch-off condition of the compressor motor in order to supply the necessary operating pressure after a restart as quickly as possible. In particular in such situations, the run-up current limitation explained is advantageous.
The contents of the diagram of the
A conventional shockwave apparatus can easily be equipped according to the invention by removing a pressure reducing valve, mounting setting elements (potentiometers) for a target value setting and integrating the contents of
Further, a display for the pressure target value can be integrated such as by a program change of the operating software controlling a display present anyway or by adding a display element.
Some quantitative examples can illustrate the advantages of the invention:
A typical compressor has a characteristic curve in the sense of volume rates (transport powers) achievable at certain pressures, naturally enabling larger volume rates at lower pressures and smaller volume rates at higher pressures. The prior art operates the compressor with a fixed rotation rate of the compressor motor and along this characteristic curve in this manner. Actually, the characteristic curve is only an upper limit of a working area, the lower working points not being used in the prior art. If for example at a certain desired working frequency of the switching valve, a certain transport power of for example 4 l/min is necessary and the compressor produces 6 bar output pressure at this transport power, maybe only 3 bar operating pressure are desired. In this case, the pressure reducing valve discharges the pressure difference to the environment or, to be somewhat more correct, discharges a pressure gas volume, namely for example 3.5 l/min. These 3.5 l/min pressure gas are the difference between 4 l/min as required and 7.5 l/min actually possible at a pressure of 3 bar. According to the invention, the compressor would be operated by somewhat more than half of the rotation rate in this situation and no pressure reducing valve would be used. Thus, the noise and the energy consumption of the compressor are substantially reduced.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 049 924.5 | Oct 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/006367 | 10/19/2010 | WO | 00 | 7/6/2012 |