1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a sole and a shoe.
2. Background
Many modern sport shoes include shoe soles including foamed materials. For example, foams made from ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) or polyurethane (PU) provide excellent cushioning properties for the loads arising in a shoe sole and are therefore used as a typical material for a midsole, which is arranged between an insole region and an outsole region of a shoe sole.
The lifetime of midsoles made from foamed materials, however, is rather limited. Irreversible degradations of the foamed materials under repeated compression and shearing loads on the sole are the reason that initially good cushioning properties are quickly lost. As a result, the sport shoe is “worn-out” and no longer meets the requirements of cushioning and biomechanically supporting the foot.
Furthermore, the dynamic properties of the foamed materials are strongly temperature dependent, which causes problems, in particular for sports (e.g., running) performed outdoors in cold weather, as the foamed material becomes hard, thus diminishing its cushioning properties. A further disadvantage of the use of foamed materials is the limited possibilities to adapt the cushioning properties to the size of a shoe and the expected weight of the wearer. Also, at smaller shoe sizes the surface portion of the foamed material is larger in relation to the volume, thus leading to lower temperatures of the foamed material (i.e., an undesirable hardness) when subjected to low-temperature environments. Modifications in sole constructions beyond the use of midsole layers of different thicknesses can only be realized, in mass production, through high effort and high cost.
Therefore, a number of approaches are known in the art to at least partly replace midsoles made from foamed materials.
For example, German Patent Application No. DE 10 2006 015 649 discloses arranging cushioning elements made from a thermoplastic urethane (TPU) below a sole area, which elements do not comprise foamed materials. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0209230 further discloses sole constructions, wherein a plurality of curved spring elements is arranged in the sole area, all of which have essentially the same orientation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,943 shows a cushioning insert serving as reinforcement and being integrated into an otherwise common midsole of a shoe.
The known constructions, however, are not able to provide the advantageous cushioning properties of a new midsole made from foamed materials. Furthermore, the constructions mentioned in the last two documents are very complex to manufacture and for this reason are not practically used.
Further, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0038522 A1 describes soles with cavities in which support members are placed that return towards their original shape when deflected by an external force. U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,732 B1 describes a sole structure with a frame element. The frame element extends around a heel portion and serves as a spring element in combination with the midsole. Finally, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0178303 A1 describes a sole assembly with an upper plate and a lower plate in a forefoot portion of the sole assembly, and a plurality of lower plate arms curving downwardly from the upper plate.
Embodiments of the present invention are therefore based on the problem of providing a sole construction that can be easily manufactured, that uses minimal foamed materials, and that can be economically manufactured in order to at least partly overcome the above-mentioned disadvantages of the art.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a sole for a shoe, in particular a sport shoe, includes at least one first leaf spring element having an essentially parallel orientation with respect to the longitudinal direction of the sole and at least one second leaf spring element being arranged in the forefoot part and being essentially orthogonally oriented with respect to the longitudinal direction of the sole.
Leaf spring elements in a shoe sole can provide cushioning properties that have minimal disadvantages compared to the use of foamed materials. This applies, however, only if the leaf spring elements are optimally oriented for the expected loads. In contrast to a foamed material having isotropic cushioning properties, since the material is simply compressed under a load, leaf spring elements can provide optimal elastic support of the foot sole only if they are deflected in their preferred direction. An arrangement of the first leaf spring element in a longitudinal direction allows for elastically absorbing the ground reaction forces arising during heel strike. The at least one second leaf spring element in the forefoot part is, due to its orthogonal orientation, adapted to laterally balance the foot and to support the foot against misorientations such as pronation and supination (i.e., a tilting movement of the forefoot part to the medial and the lateral side, respectively).
In contrast to a midsole made from a foamed material, the first and second leaf spring elements of the present invention can be made from materials having a long lifetime and minimal temperature dependency. Furthermore, the first and the second leaf spring elements can be easily adapted to different shoe sizes and the correspondingly expected weight of the wearer of the shoe.
A particularly advantageous support and guidance function of the sole is achieved if at least a pair of second leaf spring elements is arranged in the forefoot part such that they extend from the medial to the lateral side of the forefoot part of the sole. In this preferred embodiment support of the foot by the leaf spring elements is achieved on both the lateral side as well as the medial side. This can be achieved by different arrangements, for example by a pair of separate second leaf spring elements, or also by a pair of second leaf spring elements that are connected to each other, wherein one leaf spring element extends from the lateral rim up to approximately the center of the forefoot part, and the other leaf spring element extends from the center to the medial rim of the forefoot part. Symmetric partitioning, however, is not required.
In one preferred arrangement, a plurality of pairs of second leaf spring elements extend in parallel from the medial to the lateral side of the forefoot part of the sole. This arrangement is capable of withstanding particularly well the loads arising during push-off with the forefoot part. Further, it provides deformation properties that essentially correspond to the dynamic properties of a foamed material as it is typically used in the midsole of the forefoot part.
Preferably, the first and/or the second leaf spring element includes a non-planar form so that the leaf spring element extends from an insole region to an outsole region. Accordingly, the curved leaf spring elements start from the insole region (arranged close to the foot), bridge the midsole region (which is typically filled with a foamed midsole) and extend to the outsole region (i.e. the region of the sole arranged at the ground arranged at a greater distance from the foot). This preferred embodiment facilitates an almost unhindered elastic deflection of the leaf spring elements between the insole region and the outsole region of the sole. It is particularly preferred if the first and/or the second leaf spring element has in each case a convex curved region and a concave curved region.
In one embodiment two opposing first leaf spring elements are provided that preferably extend in the region of the arch of the foot. The opposing orientation of the leaf spring elements reinforces this part of the sole in which a sufficient support of the foot is of primary importance to avoid injuries.
Particularly preferred is an arrangement of the sole including at least one sole plate wherein the at least one first leaf spring element and the at least one second leaf spring element are arranged below the sole plate. In other words, in this embodiment the first and the second leaf spring elements extend in the space between the sole plate and the ground (or outsole layer 40, if provided). The sole plate and the leaf spring elements can be provided as a single piece, for example by injection moulding. This manufacturing technique may allow easy production of the sole design of embodiments of the present invention at very low costs. The described sole plate can be advantageously used together with the integrated first leaf spring element even if the forefoot part of the sole has a different design than explained above.
Preferably, the sole plate extends essentially over the complete length of the sole and includes an optional heel cup that encompasses the heel like a bowl. Support of the foot is of particular importance if discrete leaf spring elements are used instead of the known homogenous midsole made from a foamed material. The three-dimensionally shaped sole plate assures on the one hand that the leaf spring elements do not exert point loads on the foot sole. In addition, it avoids unintended rolling of the foot's ankle during the gait cycle. Furthermore, the sole plate, which has in some embodiments an extension over essentially the complete length of the sole, may serve as a chassis or frame for the shoe.
Each leaf spring element includes preferably an end that is connected to the sole plate and an end not connected to the sole plate, wherein the ends of a plurality of leaf spring elements not connected to the sole plate may be interconnected.
A first cushioning element may be arranged between at least one end of a leaf spring element that is not connected to the sole element (referred to as the “free end”) and the sole plate to selectively influence the dynamic properties of the sole. For this purpose, a first cushioning element can for example be arranged on the upper surface of the leaf spring element and/or on the lower surface of the sole plate, for example by gluing. The first cushioning element may be a structural cushioning element that is preferably free from foamed material.
A second cushioning element, which may be made from a foamed material, is preferably arranged such that it is deformed only after a preferably predefined deflection of the first and/or the second leaf spring element. The described arrangement of the first and the second cushioning elements allows an exact adaptation of the dynamic properties of the sole to the expected loads. When a load is applied to the sole the leaf spring elements provide an essentially elastic restoring force upon deflection, whereas the cushioning elements cushion both the deflection movement as well as the restoring movement. Thereby peak loads on the foot sole and the joints of the wearer of the shoe are avoided. The second cushioning element, which is preferably a foamed cushioning element, is preferably only deformed after a predefined deflection of the first and/or the second leaf spring element. As a result, the above described degradation of this material occurs substantially slower than in known sole constructions wherein each load directly leads to a deformation of the foamed midsole material.
According to a further aspect the present invention relates to a shoe with a sole according to the above-described embodiments. Such a shoe, which may for example be used as a sport shoe, has a substantially longer lifetime with constant cushioning properties than a shoe having a foamed midsole. It is particularly preferred if the shoe has a shoe upper that is at least partially directly connected to the above described sole plate. This results in a particularly stable and direct connection between the shoe upper and the leaf spring elements of the sole construction. The foot is safely retained between the upper and the sole plate of the shoe so that a cushioning function of the leaf spring elements reacts directly on the foot.
Aspects of the present invention are described in more detail with reference to the accompanying figures.
In the following, presently preferred embodiments of the invention are further explained with reference to a sole construction for a sport shoe. The present invention may also be used in other types of shoes. The particular advantages of a lifetime without changes of the dynamical properties of the shoe and the high number of possibilities to adapt the cushioning properties of the shoe to the size and the requirements of the wearer of the shoe are, however, particularly important for sport shoes.
A three-dimensionally shaped sole plate 20 is arranged below the shoe upper 10. The sole plate 20 serves as a chassis or frame for the overall shoe construction and is preferably made as a single piece including the plurality of first and second leaf spring elements 22 and 23 and a heel cup 24, for example by injection molding a suitable plastic material such as TPU. It is also conceivable to use polyamide or composite materials that may be reinforced with fibres. In doing so, the fibres are preferably inserted in a flow direction. If different materials are to be used, however, for example a harder synthetic material for the sole plate 20 and a more flexible material for the leaf spring elements 22 and 23, multi component injection molding may be used for cost-effective manufacture.
The shoe upper 10 is attached to the upper rim 26 of the sole plate 20, preferably by sewing along a seam 12 or by other attachment techniques such as, for example, gluing and welding. The sole plate can also be directly injected to an insole of the shoe upper (if available) or can be glued to it.
As can be seen from
In the heel part the sole plate 20 and the shoe upper 10 overlap. This reinforces the heel part without the need for other constructive measures. The foot of a wearer of the shoe 1 (not shown in
Both the heel cup 24 (which securely encompasses the foot from below and three sides) and the rim 26 (which preferably extends up to the forefoot part) contribute to the stability of the shoe 1. This applies to the constructive stability of the shoe 1 itself, since the torsional stiffness of the sole plate 20 is increased. It applies also to the stability that the shoe 1 provides for the foot so that undue tilting of the foot away from the sole plate 20 is reliably avoided.
The plurality of leaf spring elements 22 and 23 have a lower surface that is in contact with the ground, either independently or through intervening elements such as outsole layer 40. The plurality of leaf spring elements 22 and 23 are arranged below the sole plate 20 between the above-mentioned insole region and an outsole region defined by the outsole layer 40. The leaf spring elements 22 and 23 therefore replace the midsole layer of a standard sole design. Loads acting on the shoe, for example during heel strike and during push-off with the forefoot part, cause an elastic deformation of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 as explained in more detail below with reference to
It is advantageous if the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 are biased (i.e., the distance between the sole plate 20 and the free end of a leaf spring element after (i) the manufacture of the leaf spring element; and (ii) its assembly in the shoe, are different. Leaf spring elements 22 and 23 could either be assembled with such a bias so that the cushioning elements described below in detail have a tensile strain when not loaded (i.e., the distance between the sole plate 20 and the free end of the leaf spring element is larger after the manufacture than after the assembly). Thereby, cushioning is already provided even at the lowest load. Conversely, the cushioning elements can already be compressed by the leaf spring elements without any load having been applied to the sole (i.e., the distance between the sole plate 20 and the free end of the leaf spring element is smaller after the manufacture than after the assembly). Thereby, the tension within the material can be reduced by the deflection of the leaf spring elements. Moreover, the combination of differently biased leaf spring elements in different regions of the sole is also possible.
In a further embodiment (not depicted in the figures) several leaf spring elements are arranged on top of each other so that they are deflected together by a respective load.
First cushioning elements 30 are arranged between the free ends of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 and the lower side of the sole plate 20. The first cushioning elements 30 cushion both the deformation movement of the leaf springs 22 and 23 when the sole is loaded, and the opposite movement when the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 spring back. For the above-mentioned reasons the first cushioning elements 30 are preferably not made from foamed materials. Instead, structural cushioning elements are preferably used as disclosed in, for example, German Patent Application Nos. DE 102 34 913 A1 or DE 10 2006 015 649 A1. In the embodiment shown in
Apart from the first cushioning elements shown in
Instead of the described structural cushioning elements 30 it is also possible to use cushioning elements made from a standard midsole material, for example a foamed EVA. In contrast to conventional midsoles, a longer lifetime of the sole can be expected according to embodiments of the present invention since the foamed material must only cushion the deformation movement, whereas the actual restoring force against a deformation of the sole is provided by the elastically deflected leaf spring elements 22 and 23. In this respect the design is similar to a shock-absorber of a car, wherein separate constructive elements provide the restoring force (for example a steel spring) and the cushioning (oil). In contrast to the use of a homogenous midsole made from a foamed material, this separation allows both a longer lifetime and a more exact adjustment of the sole properties.
Although in the preferred embodiment a separate cushioning element 30 is assigned to each free end of a leaf spring elements 22 and 23, other arrangements are possible as well, wherein a single cushioning element 30 cushions the deflection of several leaf spring elements 22 and 23, or wherein several cushioning elements 30 are arranged next to each other or on top of each other between a free end of a single leaf spring element 23 or 22 and the lower side of the sole plate 20. Alternatively, cushioning elements 30 can be completely abandoned in a constructive design of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23. Furthermore, it is possible to releasably attach the cushioning elements 30 to the sole plate 20 and/or the free ends of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 to replace one or more cushioning elements 30 in case of wear or for a selective adaptation of the cushioning properties, or for design purposes (e.g., to change the color). An arrangement is also possible (not shown) where the cushioning element 30 is only attached to one side, either at the free end of a leaf spring element 22 or 23 or to the sole plate 20, and wherein the cushioning element 30 has at its free end a distance from the leaf spring element 22 or 23 or from the sole plate 20, respectively. Thereby the leaf spring element 22, 23 can at first be deflected undamped by the cushioning element 30 since the cushioning element 30 is only compressed after a predefined deflection movement of the leaf spring element 22 or 23.
Independent from their particular arrangement, the cushioning elements 30 can be adhered between the sole plate 20 and the free ends of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23. Pad printing to apply the heated and fluidized adhesive is particularly advantageous. In this process, a punch or pad absorbs the adhesive in the form of a printed design and transfers it to the body to be printed. Thus, manual, time consuming application of adhesive can be automated, thereby saving time, costs, and adhesive. The quality of the bond can also be improved. Pad printing is particularly well suited for rough bodies since the punch or pad adapts to the background.
The free ends of several leaf spring elements 22 and 23 may be interconnected either directly or by the material of the outsole to provide a higher amount of structural integrity in certain areas of the sole. For example, the free ends of the two rearmost first leaf spring elements 22 in the embodiment of
Due to their specific orientation, the three rearmost leaf spring elements 22 can be easily deflected during heel strike as schematically shown in
The outsole 40 is preferably arranged below the cushioning elements 30. The outsole layer 40 primarily serves to provide a good grip on the ground and to protect against premature wear due to abrasion. The outsole layer 40 can include individual elements that are arranged below individual free ends of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23. It is also possible, however, that the outsole layer 40 extends over several leaf spring elements, as shown in
Whereas the cushioning of ground reaction forces is of primary importance during heel strikes, as shown in
Preferably not only the outer side wall has an upward extension, but the side walls may be interconnected at their upper and lower ends so that that they can be securely adhered with the sole plate 20 and the free ends of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23. Thereby, the interconnection between upper ends of the side walls has an upward extension that extends beyond the rim of the sole plate 20 to avoid a lateral shift of the cushioning elements. It is also possible to not only connect the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 with the sole plate 20 but also with the shoe upper 10 so that deformations of the leaf spring elements 22 and 23 affect the properties of the shoe upper (e.g., the shoe upper may get tighter and wider). For example, the leaf spring element 22 or 23 could also have at its free end an extension vertical to the shoe upper that moves upwardly at a lateral deformation of the leaf spring element 22 or 23 along the shoe upper and thus provides additional lateral stability.
The cross-section of
Also, in the embodiments of
With the described embodiments the biomechanical properties of the sole can be specifically adapted to the loads that are to be expected for shoes of different size. Such fine-tuning cannot be easily realized for homogeneous midsoles made from a foamed material since it would require, for example, modification of the chemical composition of the midsole material depending on different sizes of the shoe. Such modification would result in substantially increased manufacturing costs.
As also described above, the free ends of leaf spring elements 22 and 23 may be interconnected. Interconnected leaf spring elements 22 and 23 provide a combined restoring force that substantially corresponds to the sum of the restoring forces of the individual leaf spring elements 22 and 23. The larger the number of interconnected free ends, the larger the potential restoring force. Interconnected free ends may therefore provide a significantly higher restoring force to a load than a single free end.
In an alternative embodiment, there may be cushioning elements placed between the free ends of leaf spring elements 22 or 23 and the sole plate, as illustrated above in connection with
In a further alternative embodiment (not illustrated), adjacent leaf spring elements are arranged so that a first deflecting leaf spring element touches the adjacent second spring element after a certain deformation and then also applies a force onto the adjacent second leaf spring element. The adjacent second spring element would then be deformed by the first spring element (similar to a chain reaction). This arrangement therefore leads to a delayed combined restoring force. In this way, adjacent spring elements would affect each other even if they are not interconnected with a “connection portion”.
First leaf spring elements 22a in
First leaf spring elements 22b in
Second leaf spring elements 23 (23a-e) are arranged in the front part of the sole and include second leaf spring elements 23a (located at the medial side), second leaf spring elements 23b (located at the lateral side extending to the center part), second leaf spring elements 23c (located at the lateral side), second leaf spring elements 23d (located at the front side), and second leaf spring elements 23e (located at the center part), and provide cushioning in respective regions of sole plate 20.
The interconnection of leaf spring elements 22 and 23 in
The deflection of a leaf spring element may be limited by constant factors, for example the cross section of its material at the point at which is it fixed to the sole plate. A sufficiently long leaf spring element may therefore provide a substantially higher degree of cushioning in relation to its length than a foamed material because the amount of compression of a foamed material depends on its dimensions. Therefore, with the same sole height more cushioning can be achieved; or with less sole height the same cushioning can be achieved.
Foam module 211 is made from foamed materials such as ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) or polyurethane (PU), which provide excellent cushioning properties for typical loads arising in a shoe sole. The modular system may also include different foam modules that provide different degrees of cushioning depending on the materials used.
Leaf spring module 212 includes second leaf spring elements 23 with connected free ends as described above and overcomes disadvantages of foam elements, such as, for example, a limited lifetime and the dependence of material properties on environmental characteristics such as temperature, as also described above.
Leaf spring module with foam elements 213 additionally includes foam elements that are arranged between a free end of the leaf spring elements 23 and sole plate 20. As described above, in contrast to conventional midsoles, a longer lifetime of the foam element is to be expected in this embodiment since the foamed material must only cushion the deformation movement, whereas the actual restoring force against a deformation of the sole is provided by the elastically deflected leaf spring elements 213.
Leaf spring module with structures 214 additionally includes structural elements that are arranged between a free end of the leaf spring elements 23 and the sole plate. Examples of such structural elements are the cushioning elements 30 discussed above in connection with
A second group of cushioning modules 220-224 (depicted in
The second group of cushioning modules additionally includes sliding module 220, which is described in detail in European Patent Nos. EP 1402795 and EP 1402796. Sliding module 220 has an upper sliding surface and a lower sliding surface, wherein the lower sliding surface is arranged below the upper sliding surface so as to be slidable in at least two directions. This arrangement leads to a sliding movement of the surfaces that distributes the deceleration of the shoe over a larger time period. This in turn reduces the amount of force acting on the athlete and thereby the momentum transfer to the muscles and the bones. Since the sliding movement of the upper sliding surface relative to the lower sliding surface may occur in several directions, strains can be effectively reduced in two orthogonal directions (i.e., effectively in a plane).
The cushioning modules 211-214 and 220-224 can be fixed permanently to the sole by, for example, gluing and/or welding. In this way a large variety of soles adapted for specific purposes can be manufactured efficiently from a limited number of components, without the need for an individual design of each resulting shoe.
The various cushioning modules 211-214 and 220-224 may also be provided with means for removably fixing the various modules (e.g., upper, sole, and cushioning modules) to each other. Such means may include clip-in means, magnetic means, screws and related fixations, and any other means known to a person skilled in the relevant art. Attaching or releasing the components may be performed with specifically adapted tools, conventional tools, or no tools at all. This leads to a modular shoe that can be rapidly adapted by a user to different or changing needs (e.g., weather or ground conditions) or in which modules that have a shorter lifetime than others can be exchanged, for example a module with foam. A module may even be exchanged with an improved module which did not exist when the user bought the modular shoe.
The large number of possible designs can best be exploited by a system in which a user configures his or her desired shoe, which is then manufactured accordingly and delivered to the user. This can be facilitated by an online system in which the user is provided with different options (e.g., uppers, soles, cushioning modules, materials, and colors) from which he or she configures the desired shoe. The system may also help the user with the configuration by relating different functionalities (related to various desired factors, for example, ground conditions; environmental conditions such as, for example, weather; purpose of use such as, for example, running, walking, or climbing; degree of cushioning; specific personal conditions such as, for example, weight or protection for specific joints or muscles; or high life time cushioning element vs. comfort) to the respective elements of the modular system, thereby providing an individual solution to the problem posed by the user.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 054 617 | Dec 2009 | DE | national |
10193336 | Dec 2010 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5185943 | Tong et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5367790 | Gamow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5713140 | Baggenstoss | Feb 1998 | A |
6449878 | Lyden | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6601042 | Lyden | Jul 2003 | B1 |
D507094 | Lyden | Jul 2005 | S |
6925732 | Clarke | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7016867 | Lyden | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7100308 | Aveni | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107235 | Lyden | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7549236 | Dillon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7752775 | Lyden | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770306 | Lyden | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8209883 | Lyden | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020038522 | Houser | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030051372 | Lyden | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050102857 | Yen | May 2005 | A1 |
20070209230 | Dillon | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080016720 | Aveni | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034615 | Nishiwaki | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080256827 | Hardy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090126224 | Greene | May 2009 | A1 |
20090178303 | Hurd | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211114 | Ivester | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20120216424 | Lyden | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10234913 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102006015649 | Oct 2007 | DE |
1 386 553 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 842 441 | Oct 2007 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110138652 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |