The present invention relates to a cushioning system for a shoe using foam components having different shapes and densities.
When shoes, in particular sports shoes, are manufactured, two objectives are to provide a good grip on the ground and to sufficiently cushion the ground reaction forces arising during the step cycle, in order to reduce strain on the muscles and the bones. In traditional shoe manufacturing, the first objective is addressed by the outsole: whereas, for cushioning, a midsole is typically arranged above the outsole. In shoes subjected to greater mechanical loads, the midsole is typically manufactured from continuously foamed ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA).
Detailed research of the biomechanics of a foot during running has shown, however, that a homogeneously shaped midsole is not well suited for the complex processes occurring during the step cycle. The course of motion from ground contact with the heel until push-off with the toe part is a three-dimensional process including a multitude of complex rotating movements of the foot from the lateral side to the medial side and back.
In the past, to selectively influence this course of motion, different support elements have been integrated into the foamed midsole with different material properties that, for example, selectively avoid supination or excessive pronation of the wearer of the shoe. This applies in particular to the forefoot part of the sole, which determines the rolling-off and the push-off properties, and also to the heel part of the sole, which determines the reaction of the shoe during initial ground contact.
Although some progress has been made in the biomechanical control of the step cycle, these developments have a series of disadvantages. For example, the addition of specific support elements to the foamed midsole substantially increases the weight of the shoe, which becomes particularly apparent and disadvantageous with running shoes. Further, the integration of the support elements substantially increases the production costs of the sole, since each of these elements must be securely connected to the surrounding midsole by, for example, cementing, fusing, etc. during manufacture of the shoe.
The described approach of the prior art hinders an easy and cost-efficient modification of the biomechanical properties of a midsole, since each change of the support elements, either with respect to their material or their shape, requires a complete redesign of the midsole. It is not possible to quickly adapt the shoe to new results of biomechanical research or to the changing requirements of a new kind of sport activity.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a shoe sole that can be adapted to provide increased support for an arch region of a foot and a high degree of flexibility in a forefoot region, either for cushioning or elastic energy storage.
Generally, the invention relates to a cartridge cushioning system that includes a load distribution plate and functional elements. In accordance with the invention, the load distribution plate serves as a support for the functional elements of the shoe sole, for example, lateral and medial deformation elements. The load distribution plate transmits and distributes the response of each element to external loads over the forefoot region of the foot. Accordingly, the number, the arrangement, and the specific material properties of the elements contribute to selectively influence the course of motion of a wearer's foot, for example during rolling-off and push-off, to avoid supination or excessive pronation. As such, the independent deformation elements adapt exactly to the deformation needs of a specific area of the wearer's foot.
Because the load distribution plate encases the functional elements starting from an aft end of a forefoot region, the three-dimensional shape of the plate provides increased support for the arch region of the foot and a high degree of flexibility in the forefoot region, either for cushioning or elastic energy storage. If it turns out that different deformation elements are more suitable to meet the present or changed requirements of the sole, the existing deformation elements can easily be replaced without having to make any other modification in the manufacturing process of the sole. Moreover, the overall weight of the sole may be reduced considerably by constructing the forefoot portion in accordance with the invention, with separately arranged forefoot elements instead of the continuously foamed material.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a sole for an article of footwear. The sole includes a first load distribution plate disposed in a forefoot region of the sole, a lateral deformation element, and a medial deformation element. The first load distribution plate extends from an aft end of the forefoot region to encase at least partially at least one of the lateral deformation element and the medial deformation element.
In another aspect, the invention relates to an article of footwear comprising an upper and a sole. The sole includes a first load distribution plate disposed in a forefoot region of the sole, a lateral deformation element, and a medial deformation element. The first load distribution plate extends from an aft end of the forefoot region to encase at least partially at least one of the lateral deformation element and the medial deformation element.
In various embodiments of the foregoing aspects, the lateral deformation element and the medial deformation element are spaced apart from each other to independently deform in response to a load on the sole, which is not possible where the elements are integrated into a surrounding EVA foam. The first load distribution plate has a generally recumbent U-shaped cross-sectional profile, wherein a closed end of the first load distribution plate is oriented towards the aft end of the forefoot region of the sole. This shape leads to increased structural stability of the sole, since the deformation elements are encompassed by the load distribution plate from behind and from below. The first load distribution plate may further include a lateral lower side and a medial lower side, wherein each lower side can be independently deflected. In one embodiment, the lateral lower side and the medial lower side are separated from each other by, for example, a cut section or gap. As such, the response properties of the sole on the medial side can be independently adjusted from the response properties on the lateral side of the forefoot region. In one embodiment, the first load distribution plate includes an upper side extending further towards a front portion of the sole than at least one of the lateral lower side and the medial lower side.
In still other embodiments, the lateral deformation element has a lateral rear deformation element and a lateral front deformation element and the medial deformation element has a medial rear deformation element and a medial front deformation element. In one embodiment, the lateral rear deformation element, the lateral front deformation element, the medial rear deformation element, and the medial front deformation element are spaced apart from each other. The separate deformation elements are sequentially loaded during rolling-off and pushing-off with the foot. Their respective material properties, in particular their compressibility, selectively independently influence each part of this process, on the lateral side as well as on the medial side. The sole may further include a toe-deformation element disposed in a forward portion of the forefoot region and spaced apart from the lateral front deformation element and the medial front deformation element. The toe-deformation element may extend beyond a forward edge of the first load distribution plate and may be more elastic than at least one other deformation element.
In other embodiments, the lateral rear deformation element, the lateral front deformation element, the medial rear deformation element, the medial front deformation element and the toe-deformation element are substantially uniformly spaced apart, and the load distribution plate includes at least one ridge disposed between adjacent deformation elements. In addition, the rear deformation elements may have a different hardness than the front deformation elements. The elasticity of the deformation elements may vary and at least one of the lateral deformation elements may have a different hardness than at least one of the medial deformation elements.
Additionally, the sole may include a second load distribution plate disposed in a heel region of the sole, at least one cushioning element disposed proximate the second load distribution plate, and at least one guidance element disposed proximate the second load distribution plate. The at least one cushioning element is configured and located to determine a cushioning property of the sole during a first ground contact with the heel region. The at least one guidance element is configured and located to bring a wearer's foot toward a neutral position after the first ground contact. The cushioning element protects the joints and muscles against the ground reaction forces arising during the first ground contact, while the material properties of the guidance element assure that even immediately after ground contact, pronation control occurs, bringing the foot into an intermediate position that is correct for this stage of the step cycle. The second load distribution plate in the heel region assures uniform force distribution on the heel and assures that the cushioning and guiding effect of the elements is not restricted to single parts of the heel, but evenly transmitted to the complete heel region. Thus, the foot is optimally prepared for the subsequent rolling-off phase of the forefoot region. In one embodiment, the sole also includes a stability element disposed proximate the second load distribution plate, the stability element configured and located to control pronation during transition to a rolling-off phase of a step cycle.
In various embodiments, the at least one guidance element includes a lateral guidance element and a medial guidance element. The combined effect of these two elements, during ground contact with the shoe sole, enables the controlled transition of the center of mass from the lateral rear side to the center of the heel. The cushioning element, the lateral guidance element, the medial guidance element, and the stability element each may be disposed generally within quadrants of the heel region. In one embodiment, the cushioning element is generally located in a lateral rear quadrant, the lateral guidance element is generally located in a lateral forward quadrant, the medial guidance element is generally located in a medial rear quadrant, and the stability element is generally located in a medial forward quadrant, and at least two of the cushioning element, the lateral guidance element, the medial guidance element, and the stability element are spaced apart. This arrangement of the functional elements advantageously provides complete “pronation control” from the first ground contact until the transition to the rolling-off phase. After the cushioning compression of the cushioning element during the first ground contact, the diagonally arranged guidance elements guide the load of the center of gravity to the center of the heel. The stability element arranged in the medial front part assures that the center of gravity does not excessively shift to the medial side in the course of a further turning of the foot.
Furthermore, the sole may include at least one reinforcing element disposed between at least one of the cushioning element and the lateral guidance element, the lateral guidance element and the stability element, the stability element and the medial guidance element, the medial guidance element and the cushioning element, the cushioning element and the stability element, and the lateral guidance element and the medial guidance element. In one embodiment, at least one of the lateral guidance element and the medial guidance element has a greater hardness than the cushioning element. Also, the hardness of at least one of the lateral guidance element, the medial guidance element, and the stability element may vary.
In yet further embodiments, the stability element extends beyond an edge of the second load distribution plate. The second load distribution plate has a generally recumbent U-shaped cross-sectional profile and receives in an interior region thereof at least a portion of one of the cushioning element, the lateral guidance element, the medial guidance element, and the stability element. In one embodiment, a closed end of the second load distribution plate is oriented towards the forefoot region of the sole. The sole may further include an outsole at least partially disposed below at least one of the cushioning element, the lateral guidance element, the medial guidance element, and the stability element. The outsole may be configured to allow for independent deformation of at least one of the cushioning element, the lateral guidance element, the medial guidance element, and the stability element. In another embodiment, the first load distribution plate is coupled to the second load distribution plate.
These and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention herein disclosed, will become apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and can exist in various combinations and permutations.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
Embodiments of the present invention are described below. It is, however, expressly noted that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, but rather the intention is that variations, modifications, and equivalents that are apparent to the person skilled in the art are also included. In particular, the present invention is not intended to be limited to soles for sports shoes, but rather the present invention can also be used to produce soles for any article of footwear. Further, only a left or right sole and/or shoe is depicted in any given figure; however, it is to be understood that the left and right soles/shoes are typically mirror images of each other and the description applies to both left and right soles/shoes.
The distances 120 between the elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 are preferably arranged in a star-like pattern; however, other distributions of the elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 are also possible, for example with distances 120 running straight from the medial side to the lateral side of the sole 3. In some cases, it is possible that the edges of the deformation elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 may contact each other, as long as substantially independent deformation of each single deformation element is assured. The toe-deformation element 114 may also be formed in two parts, as indicated by a dashed line 8 in FIG. 2. Also contemplated are embodiments where only a groove-like recess is arranged between the lateral portion and the medial portion of the toe-deformation element 114, thereby providing separate lateral and medial push-off regions of the forefoot region 5.
The compression characteristics of the deformation elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 can be determined by using materials with differing properties and also by varying the size and shape of the elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 to selectively influence the rolling-off properties of the shoe. If, for example, the medial front deformation element 113 and/or the medial rear deformation element 111 have a greater hardness compared to the other deformation elements, pronation is opposed. Inversely, if an athlete is more likely to supinate, a lateral front deformation element 112 and/or a lateral rear deformation 110 of a greater hardness could be used to oppose supination. Further, differences in the size, shape, and/or material properties, of the front and rear deformation elements of the lateral and/or the medial side can be provided. In a particular embodiment, EVA elements based on a rubber mixture are used for the deformation elements having, for example, a hardness of 57 Shore Asker C. Other possible materials are discussed in further detail hereinbelow. It is also possible to provide a deformation element 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 with a varying hardness (i.e., a hardness changing along the element's extent), as opposed to a constant hardness. Also, the shape of the elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114 may influence the deformation characteristics. For example, a concave recess or groove provides a different characteristic (softer) than a convex projection (harder).
For the toe-deformation element 114, the use of a highly elastic material is suitable. The highly elastic material deforms substantially without energy loss and thereby facilitates the push-off from the ground. At the beginning of the rolling-off phase, this element is at first “loaded” due to the increasing weight. Potential energy is stored by the elastic deformation of the element. At the end of the rolling-off phase, directly during push-off, the stored energy is released and transmitted as kinetic energy to the foot of the wearer to support the course of motion.
In order not to interfere with the independent deformation of the deformation elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, the distances 120 are covered by bellows-like structures 201 in the outsole 200. If, for example, the front medial deformation element 113 is further deformed than the rear medial deformation element 111, the distance 120 to be covered by the outsole 200 is greater. This change in distance, however, can be easily compensated by the bellows-like structure 201 of the outsole 200 so that both deformation elements 111, 113 can still react to the arising loads substantially independently relative to each other. The structures 201 also keep dirt and moisture from entering into the distances 120, without impairing the dynamics of the deformation elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114.
The toe-deformation element 114 optionally has an edge 115 that provides additional support to an upper side 109 of the load distribution plate 100, as best seen in
The lower side 108 of the U-shaped portion of the load distribution plate 100 is shorter than its upper side 109, as best seen in
The sole 803 also includes a second cartridge cushioning system 807 that includes a second load distribution plate 810 that extends in a heel region 806 of the sole 803. The second load distribution plate 810 is shown having a generally recumbent U-shaped cross-sectional profile having a closed end 816; however, the load distribution plate 10 can be a single substantially planar piece. Several functional elements 820, 821, 822, 823 are arranged proximate the second load distribution plate 810.
In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment, as shown in
As can be seen in
As shown in
The effect obtained in the heel region 806 and the forefoot region 805 by the combination of the first load distribution plate 800 and the second load distribution plate 810, with the aforementioned functional elements 809, 811, 812, 813, 814, 820, 821, 822, 823, is described with reference to
Thus, the sequence schematically depicted in
The functional elements 820, 821, 822, 823, as well as the deformation elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, may be advantageously manufactured from foamed elements, for example, a polyurethane (PU) foam based on a polyether. As described above, foamed EVA can also be used. The use of a PU foam based on a polyether is particularly advantageous in the heel region 806, while rubber based EVA foams are advantageously used in the forefoot region 5, due to their higher elasticity. Other suitable materials will be apparent to those of skill in the art.
The desired element function, for example cushioning, guiding, or stability, can be obtained by varying the compressibility of the functional elements 820, 821, 822, 823. In one embodiment, the hardness values of the functional elements 820, 821, 822, 823 are in the range of about 35-90 Shore Asker C (ASTM 790), more preferably in the range of about 55-70 Shore Asker C. The relative differences between cushioning, guidance, and stability depend on the field of use of the shoe and the size and the weight of the athlete. In one embodiment, the hardness of the cushioning element 20 is about Shore 60 C and the hardness of the guidance elements 21, 22 and the stability element 23 is about Shore 65 C. Different hardnesses or compressibilities can be obtained by, for example, different densities of the aforementioned foams. In one embodiment, the density of the first guidance element 21 and/or the second 22 guidance element, and/or the stability element 23 is not uniform, but varies, such as by increasing from a rear portion of the element to a front portion of the element. In this embodiment, the compressibility decreases in this direction.
The size and shape of the functional elements 820, 821, 822, 823, as well as the deformation elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, may vary to suit a particular application. The elements can have essentially any shape, such as polygonal, arcuate, or combinations thereof. In the present application, the term polygonal is used to denote any shape including at least two line segments, such as rectangles, trapezoids, and triangles, and portions thereof. Examples of arcuate shapes include circles, ellipses, and portions thereof.
The load distribution plates 100, 810 can be manufactured from lightweight stable plastic materials, for example, thermoplastic polyester elastomers, such as the Hytrel® brand sold by Dupont. Alternatively, a composite material of carbon fibers embedded into a matrix of resin can be used. Other suitable materials include glass fibers or para-aramid fibers, such as the Kevlar® brand sold by Dupont and thermoplastic polyether block amides, such as the Pebax® brand sold by Elf Atochem. In a particular embodiment, Pebax® 7233 is used. The load distribution plates 100, 810 should have sufficient stiffness to distribute the loads transmitted by the separate elements to a large area and should be sufficiently tough to withstand continuous and cyclical loads for a long lifetime. Accordingly, other suitable materials will be apparent to those of skill in the art. In one embodiment, the load distribution plates 100, 810 have a hardness of about Shore 72 D. The size, shape, and composition of the load distribution plates 100, 810 may vary to suit a particular application.
The load distribution plates 100, 810 and the elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 820, 821, 822, 823 can be manufactured, for example, by molding or extrusion. Extrusion processes may be used to provide a uniform shape. Insert molding can then be used to provide the desired geometry of open spaces, or the open spaces could be created in the desired locations by a subsequent machining operation. Other manufacturing techniques include melting or bonding. For example, the elements 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 820, 821, 822, 823 may be bonded to the load distribution plates 100, 810 with a liquid epoxy or a hot melt adhesive, such as EVA. In addition to adhesive bonding, portions can be solvent bonded, which entails using a solvent to facilitate fusing of the portions to be added.
Whereas the shoe shown in
Having described certain embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts disclosed herein may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 12 862 | Mar 2002 | DE | national |
This application incorporates by reference, and claims priority to and the benefit of, German patent application serial number 102 12 862.6, titled “Shoe Sole,” filed on Mar. 22, 2002. This application also relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/099,859, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4139187 | Hanusa | Feb 1979 | A |
4314413 | Dassler | Feb 1982 | A |
4354318 | Frederick et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4391048 | Lutz | Jul 1983 | A |
4524529 | Schaefer | Jun 1985 | A |
4551930 | Graham et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4566206 | Weber | Jan 1986 | A |
4592153 | Jacinto | Jun 1986 | A |
4616431 | Dassler | Oct 1986 | A |
4654983 | Graham et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4771554 | Hannemann | Sep 1988 | A |
4843741 | Yung-Mao | Jul 1989 | A |
4874640 | Donzis | Oct 1989 | A |
4876053 | Norton et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4881329 | Crowley | Nov 1989 | A |
5052130 | Barry et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060401 | Whatley | Oct 1991 | A |
5070629 | Graham et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5191727 | Barry et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5279051 | Whatley | Jan 1994 | A |
D344174 | Kilgore | Feb 1994 | S |
5343639 | Kilgore et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353523 | Kilgore et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5353526 | Foley et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5367792 | Richard et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5381608 | Claveria | Jan 1995 | A |
D355755 | Kilgore | Feb 1995 | S |
5461800 | Luthi et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5488786 | Ratay | Feb 1996 | A |
5493791 | Kramer | Feb 1996 | A |
5544431 | Dixon | Aug 1996 | A |
5560126 | Meschan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577334 | Park | Nov 1996 | A |
5615497 | Meschan | Apr 1997 | A |
5644857 | Ouellette et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5678327 | Halberstadt | Oct 1997 | A |
5718063 | Yamashita et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5743028 | Lombardino | Apr 1998 | A |
5761831 | Cho | Jun 1998 | A |
5782014 | Peterson | Jul 1998 | A |
5806209 | Crowley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806210 | Meschan | Sep 1998 | A |
5822886 | Luthi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826352 | Meschan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5918384 | Meschan | Jul 1999 | A |
5926974 | Friton | Jul 1999 | A |
5937544 | Russell | Aug 1999 | A |
5937545 | Dyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970628 | Meschan | Oct 1999 | A |
5983529 | Serna | Nov 1999 | A |
5987781 | Pavesi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996253 | Spector | Dec 1999 | A |
5996260 | MacNeill | Dec 1999 | A |
6023859 | Burke et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029374 | Herr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050002 | Meschan | Apr 2000 | A |
6055746 | Lyden et al. | May 2000 | A |
6115944 | Lain | Sep 2000 | A |
6119373 | Gebhard et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127010 | Rudy | Oct 2000 | A |
6195916 | Meschan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199302 | Kayano | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237251 | Litchfield et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6324772 | Meschan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354020 | Kimball et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6487796 | Avar et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6568102 | Healy et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6604300 | Meschan | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6662471 | Meschan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6722058 | Lucas et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6751891 | Lombardino | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20010049888 | Krafsur et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020078601 | Alfond et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129516 | Lucas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
G 92 10 113.5 | Nov 1992 | DE |
0192820 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0299669 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0 359 421 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0714246 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 714 611 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 815 757 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 877 177 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1118280 | Jul 2001 | EP |
WO 9520333 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9713422 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 0117384 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030208929 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |