This application is a U.S. National Stage application, filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 371, of international application no. PCT/EP2017/000750, filed on Jun. 27, 2017.
The invention relates to a shoe, especially to a sports shoe, comprising a shoe upper, wherein the shoe upper consists at least partially of a knitted fabric, wherein the shoe upper has a plurality of loops for threading a lace to allow the tying of the shoe at the foot of a wearer by means of the lace, wherein the loops are a physical structure that define a plurality of channels, the channels being the negative space defined by the loops, and wherein the term “tunnel” refers to both the physical structure of the loop and the negative space of the channel, and wherein at least a part of the loops consist of a knitted fabric, wherein the loops have the shape of a tubular body which forms a passage for the lace.
Usual lacing devices of shoes, especially of sports shoes, have loops which are arranged at a tying strip which is connected with the shoe upper or is part of the same. The loops are arranged near the tongue of the shoe.
Thus, the ability of the shoe to adapt the lacing or tying to an individual shape of the foot of the wearer is limited. Individual demands can normally not be fulfilled. This can lead to a loose fit of the shoe or to pressure marks at the foot of the wearer.
A shoe of the generic kind is shown in EP 3 114 951 A1. Similar solutions are disclosed in US 2016/0302524 A1 and US 2008/0110048 A1.
It is an object of the present invention to propose a shoe, especially a sports shoe, which provides an easy and efficient possibility to adjust the lacing or tying of the shoe at the foot of the wearer very individually.
The solution of this object according to the invention is characterized in that the knitted fabric of the shoe upper and the knitted fabric of the loops form a unitary knit construction, wherein the loops are connected with the knitted fabric of the shoe upper only by the knitted construction and are free from any means for transferring a tying force (like for example tensile strands which are arranged on or in the shoe upper).
At least a part of the loops can have an outer diameter and an inner diameter to form the tubular body for receiving the lace, wherein the tubular body has a length, wherein the length is at least 100% of the outer diameter. Preferably, the length is at least 150%, specifically at least 200%, of the outer diameter. Each loop consists of a plurality of knitted rows of yarn.
The tubular body of the loops and channels can have an axial direction, wherein the axial direction is oriented in the longitudinal direction of the shoe or draws an angle to the longitudinal direction below 30°, preferably below 25°. The longitudinal direction of the shoe is defined by a longitudinal plane that is parallel with respect to a resting surface when the shoe is resting on the resting surface. But this orientation of the loops is not mandatory. It is also possible to orient the loops under another angle up to 90° to the longitudinal direction (i.e. perpendicular to the longitudinal direction).
Preferably a number of loops is arranged in such a manner that the loops have the same axial direction.
The loops are preferably distanced from another by a distance, measured perpendicular to the axial direction, wherein the distance is between 2 mm and 25 mm.
The knitted fabric of the shoe upper can form a single layer which bears the loops.
An alternative embodiment provides that the knitted fabric of the shoe upper has at least two layers, wherein the upper layer bears the loops. In this case it can be provided that the layer below the upper layer is connected with the upper layer but has no contact with the loops.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the yarn of the shoe upper can consist of or comprise polyester or polyamide. Also, the yarn of the loops can consist of or comprise polyester or polyamide. Of course, also other kinds of yarn are suitable.
The yarns of the shoe upper and of the loops can be different in at least one (physical) property. Specifically, the yarns of the shoe upper and of the loops can have different colors. Of course, it is also possible to use the same yarn for the shoe upper and the loops.
By the proposed concept it is possible to provide a plurality of loops for threading of the lace which can be selected according to individual demands. The loops for the lace are distributed along a quite large area of the shoe upper so that the user can select the required loops according to his or her individual demands. So the lacing or tying of the shoe can be adapted perfectly not only to the shape of the foot of the wearer; it is also possible to take specific demands in consideration which depend on the type of sports and specific training situations.
It is also possible for specific types of sport or training situations to tie the shoe at the foot of the wearer to fix the shoe specifically for lateral or forward movements or to give more hold in the heel region.
Also with respect to this aspect the proposed shoe has advantages compared with pre-known solutions.
Thus, a knitted section of the shoe upper—which is relevant for tying the shoe at the foot of the wearer—is supplied at the outer surface with a plurality of loops or channels (tunnels) which are designed and dimensioned for defining a passage for a lace. The loops are made in such a manner that they are firmly connected with the knitted fabric to avoid pulling out the loops from the knitted fabric below.
A double layer knitted fabric (Double Jersey) is preferred, wherein the loops step out from the upper layer. The bottom layer is flat and ensures the stability of the whole fabric. Also a knitted fabric as a single layer (Single Jersey) is possible which then bears the plurality of loops (tubes, channels or tunnels).
The shoe upper can consist completely of the knitted fabric.
The knitted tubular body which forms the loops can be produced with well-known methods so that a specific description is not necessary here. Reference is made to the so-called Ottoman Stitch which allows the knitting of the loops on a respective knitting machine.
It was found that the knitted base material (made preferably from polyester or polyamide) as well as the number of filaments in the knitting yarn define the tensile strength. Also the length of the loops (channels, tubes) has a respective influence with respect to the stability. Accordingly, it can be taken in consideration to enlarge the length of the loops in the case of types of sports where specific high forces must be expected.
With regard to the knitting technique it should be mentioned that a preferred method is knitting the shoe upper from the right to the left side (i.e. from the lateral side to the medial side of the shoe upper (or vise versa); normally, the shoe upper is knitted from the shoe tip to the heel (or vice versa).
In the drawings embodiments of the invention are shown.
In
As can be seen from
Each loop 3 is designed as a tubular body which could also be defined as channel or tunnel and is arranged for threading a lace 4. Thus, each loop 3 forms a passage 8 for the lace 4 (see
As can be also seen from
That is, a plurality of possibilities is given for threading the lace 4 through respective loops 3 so that the shoe 1 can be tied according to individual demands at the foot of the wearer. From
Details concerning the geometry of the loops 3 become apparent from
From
The axial direction a of the loops 3 is substantially oriented in the longitudinal direction L of the shoe 1 (see
In the embodiment according to
The whole knitting construction of the shoe upper 2 including the loops 3 can be produced on a knitting machine which is well known as such and allows an economical production of the shoe upper 2.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/000750 | 6/27/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/001676 | 1/3/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1416203 | Hobson | May 1922 | A |
1538454 | Trawinski | May 1925 | A |
D132196 | Daniels | Apr 1942 | S |
D132197 | Daniels | Apr 1942 | S |
2675631 | Doughty | Apr 1954 | A |
2679117 | Reed | May 1954 | A |
4200998 | Adams | May 1980 | A |
6240657 | Weber | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286233 | Gaither | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6952890 | Blakeslee | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7073279 | Min | Jul 2006 | B2 |
D541516 | Lane, III | May 2007 | S |
7272897 | Yu | Sep 2007 | B2 |
D563657 | Matis et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D574136 | Avar | Aug 2008 | S |
7743476 | Rock | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7774956 | Dua | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D648110 | Rasmussen | Nov 2011 | S |
8161666 | Liles | Apr 2012 | B2 |
D667621 | Portzline | Sep 2012 | S |
D689684 | McMillan | Sep 2013 | S |
8657773 | Ostergard | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661711 | Settele | Mar 2014 | B2 |
D718036 | McMillan | Nov 2014 | S |
8875418 | Long | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8881430 | Seamarks | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904671 | Dojan | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8950088 | Aveni | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9113674 | Dojan | Aug 2015 | B2 |
D740538 | Roulo | Oct 2015 | S |
9192204 | Liles | Nov 2015 | B1 |
D746558 | Campbell | Jan 2016 | S |
D756621 | Weddle | May 2016 | S |
9375046 | Meir | Jun 2016 | B2 |
D768977 | Seamarks | Oct 2016 | S |
9498023 | Craig | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9510637 | Podhajny | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9532626 | Lovett | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9700101 | Lovett | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9737117 | Nonogawa | Aug 2017 | B2 |
D814776 | Odinot | Apr 2018 | S |
D815413 | Weddle | Apr 2018 | S |
9936757 | Podhajny | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10039341 | Faucher | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10051918 | Dombrow | Aug 2018 | B2 |
D829425 | Albrecht | Oct 2018 | S |
10194714 | McGinnity | Feb 2019 | B2 |
D846256 | Khalife | Apr 2019 | S |
10251448 | Klug | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10316441 | Ly | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10327511 | Boys | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10492566 | Guest | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10499709 | Pollack | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10694817 | McGinnity | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10702017 | Taylor | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10743618 | Bruce | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10765173 | Wilson | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10786035 | Howe | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10806210 | Bruce | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10844526 | Brinkman | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10856619 | Fuerst, Sr. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10905197 | Lee | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10918155 | Dekovic et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
D911678 | Petrie et al. | Mar 2021 | S |
10945482 | Schoppel | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20040181972 | Csorba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060059715 | Aveni | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060283042 | Greene | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070180730 | Greene | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080110048 | Dua | May 2008 | A1 |
20090056384 | Sayer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100154256 | Dua | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120246897 | Lee | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120255201 | Little | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20150059209 | Dekovic | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150289592 | Song | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150359290 | Podhajny | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160255913 | Uchikawa | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160302524 | Smith | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160302527 | Meir | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160324269 | Dombrow | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160345675 | Bruce | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160345677 | Bruce | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360828 | Guyan | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170006965 | Musho | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170035149 | Bruce | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170049187 | Aristizabal | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170071290 | Follet | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170071291 | Follet | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180035759 | Pollack | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180042333 | Manos-Gully | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180103714 | Howe | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180110294 | Schneider | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180135213 | Bell | May 2018 | A1 |
20180255875 | McGinnity | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180255876 | McGinnity | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180332920 | Burch | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180368506 | Bruce | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190037966 | Aceves Tinajero | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190116914 | Schoppel | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190223541 | Aceves Tinajero | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190328075 | Poulsen | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200022447 | Durrell | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200046078 | Durrell | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200048800 | McFarland, II | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200281302 | Hipp | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200390185 | Howe | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210007443 | Siegismund | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210052039 | Johnson | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210076776 | Siegismund | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210186156 | Pogl | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210368945 | Bell | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210378362 | Reis | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1143310 | Feb 1997 | CN |
101267752 | Sep 2008 | CN |
102497792 | Jun 2012 | CN |
103517647 | Jan 2014 | CN |
203633581 | Jun 2014 | CN |
203748765 | Aug 2014 | CN |
205682613 | Nov 2016 | CN |
206182490 | May 2017 | CN |
108125314 | Jun 2018 | CN |
1219195 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1219196 | Jul 2002 | EP |
3114951 | Jan 2017 | EP |
3138431 | Mar 2017 | EP |
389990 | Sep 1908 | FR |
471635 | Nov 1914 | FR |
190907001 | Oct 1909 | GB |
2005046520 | Feb 2005 | JP |
WO-2020033794 | Feb 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 62/263,916 provisional application of Guest et al U.S. Pat. No. 10,492,566 (Year: 2015). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/000750, mailed Mar. 14, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200187595 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |