Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6578290
-
Patent Number
6,578,290
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, October 17, 200124 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, June 17, 200322 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 036 103
- 036 25 R
- 036 28
- 036 68
- 036 80
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A shoe construction having a sole in which the upper surface of the sole when in normal use on a flat surface is lower at the heel bed than at the foresole portion of the shoe. Canting of the upper sole surface in a downward direction at the rear, coupled with upwardly extending sections of the heel at the rear counter, provides cradle-like surface. The peripheral edge of the sole extends upwardly over the upper surface around at least a substantial portion of its periphery and, in particular, at the rear counter where the upper periphery of the rear counter extends substantially higher than the lower most portion of the upper surface in the heel region of the sole.
Description
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to footwear and in particular to footwear having a sole construction in which the upper surface of the sole, when in normal use, is lower at the heel bed than at the foresole portion of the sole construction.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
For some time shoe or footwear soles having a construction in which the fore portion of the sole is higher than the heel portion of the sole, have been promoted as having certain physical and orthopedic advantages. Footwear made with such lower heel beds require a person using such soles lean slightly forward for proper balance. When the heel bed is lower than the foresole, there is a tendency of the foot to slide rearwardly towards the heel. Accordingly, there is a need to provide this type of sole structure with means for properly cradling the foot on the sole for normal and comfortable use.
Previous attempts to provide soles in which the heel has a negative cant in respect to the foresole have been disclosed. These earlier efforts to provide a structure of this type have concerned themselves primarily with the inclination of the sole and have not been particularly concerned with properly nesting the foot.
SUBJECT MATTER OF PRESENT INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a shoe construction having a shoe sole in which the upper surface of the sole is canted downwardly from the foresole to the heel bed when the sole bottom rests on a level surface. This construction in combination with means providing a foot cradle extending substantially upwardly around the heel at the rear counter assures the wearer his foot is properly cradled and undesired rearward movement of the foot relative to the sole when the footwear is in use is prevented.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a shoe sole having an upper surface in which the surface of the sole at the heel is normally lower than the surface of the sole at the foresole and the instep region. In this arrangement the upper surface of the sole is essentially canted rearwardly and downwardly. The sole is further provided with a peripheral edge that extends upwardly over the upper surface around at least a substantial portion of its periphery and in particular, at the rear counter where the upper periphery of the rear counter extends substantially higher than the lower most portion of the upper surface in the heel region of the sole.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The foregoing objects and advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood when considered in connection with a description of preferred embodiments of the invention in association with the drawings in which;
FIG. 1
is a medial side elevational view of a shoe sole embodying the present invention with the location of the shoe upper shown in dotted outline;
FIG. 2
is a top plan view of the embodiment of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 3
is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 4
is a front-elevational view thereof;
FIG. 5
is a rear-elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6
is a cross-sectional side view taken substantially along the line
6
—
6
of
FIG. 3
, which in turn is essentially a medial cross-sectional view taken lengthwise of the shoe sole;
FIG. 7
is a transverse cross-sectional view taken along line
7
—
7
of
FIG. 6
;
FIG. 8
is a transverse cross-sectional view taken along the line
8
—
8
of
FIG. 6
;
FIG. 9
is a transverse cross-sectional view taken along the line
9
—
9
of
FIG. 6
;
FIG. 10
is a transverse cross-sectional view taken along the line
10
—
10
of
FIG. 6
;
FIG. 11
is a transverse cross-sectional view taken along the line
11
—
11
of
FIG. 6 and
;
FIG. 12
is transverse cross-sectional view taken along the line
12
—
12
of FIG.
6
.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the preferred embodiment illustrated, a shoe construction
10
includes a shoe upper shown in dotted that is conventionally secured to the upper periphery of a shoe sole
14
. The shoe upper
12
may be formed in any satisfactory fashion using conventional styling techniques. In one embodiment the shoe upper may comprise a low cut leather upper of conventional design or styling. In the embodiment suggested by the shoe upper
12
the upper is a low cut upper but if desired shoe uppers of different styles including, high-cut uppers may be included. Additionally, the upper of the present invention contemplates the use of a sandal style upper in which the foot is not entirely engaged above the sole by the upper. In this particular design, the configuration of the shoe sole
14
becomes more relevant and has greater utility. In many cases the upper is made of leather, plastic, fabric, or a combination. For the most part, the upper provides limited support to the bottom of the foot.
The shoe sole
14
includes a foresole region
16
, an instep region
18
, and a heel region
20
with a rear counter
22
. These portions of the shoe sole
14
are integrally formed one with the other. The shoe sole
14
may be injection molded of a suitable polymer material in a conventional fashion and may comprise, for example, an injection molded plastic or other equivalent materials conventionally used for shoe sole construction. The shoe sole
14
is formed as an integral unit with an upper surface
24
and a lower surface
26
joined together by a sidewall
25
, which extends about the entire periphery of the shoe sole. The sole
14
may be integrally formed of a single material of desired density. It may also be provided with an instep insert
27
integrally molded with the remainder of the shoe sole
14
with this instep insert having a different density of durometer than the remaining portion of the shoe sole to provide added or different stiffness from the remainder of the shoe sole. The inset may take a variety of forms. As illustrated in
FIG. 2
, the insert
27
has an “H ” like configuration with a plurality of openings
28
formed in it through which the material forming the remaining portion of the shoe sole
14
may flow on molding for greater and more intimate inter-engagement with the main body of the sole.
The upper surface
24
has an upper-periphery
30
that defines the upper surface
24
. The upper surface
24
may be conventionally shaped to receive a foot and may be selectively sized with different units having conventionally different dimensions for various foot sizes. The periphery
30
of the upper may be divided into three portions including the foresole portion
16
, which extends from the toe region
32
to the junction of the instep region
18
at approximately the line
35
(
FIG. 2
) the instep region extends from line
35
rearwardly to approximately the line
37
, which defines the heel or heel bed
20
.
The periphery of the sole is essentially defined by the side-wall
25
, which may be selectively contoured and varied in width as illustrated in the drawings with the side-wall
25
extending around the medial front and lateral sides of the shoe and terminating at the rear counter
22
with the side-walls extending upwardly at the rear counter to the upper-periphery
44
of the rear counter. As illustrated in the drawings, the sidewall
25
is narrowest at the instep. The sidewall
25
has an upper edge that is highest at the instep region and lowest at the heel
20
. The sidewall
25
is widest at the foresole
16
. The narrowing of the sidewall
25
at the instep region may provide some greater flexibility for flexing the sole while walking.
The sidewall
25
may be variably formed but in the preferred embodiment is contoured to provide a visually enhanced appearance and selective structural advantages. In the preferred embodiment illustrated the surface contours of the lower surface
26
include a series of semi-cylindrical elongated shapes arranged side by side with medial semi-cylindrical shape
50
extending from the toe region rearwardly to the heel
20
and with a lateral semi-cylinder
52
also extending from the toe region rearwardly to the heel
20
. A semi-cylinder
54
extends around the periphery of and defines the heel
20
with this semi-cylinder
54
extending to the heel ends of the semi-cylinders
50
and
52
a series of transverse wedged shape cuts
56
may be formed in the semi-cylinder
54
and
50
for enhanced flexibility. A semi-cylinder
58
is formed in the heel and instep region filling the space between the cylinders
56
,
52
, and
54
. The semi-cylinder
58
may be provided with a recess
60
that is shaped, sized, and dimensioned to receive a trademark escutcheon. A pair of semi-cylinders
64
and
66
positioned side by side extends from the end of the cylinder
58
forwardly to the toe region and fills the space between the cylinders
50
and
52
.
As illustrated in
FIGS. 7 through 12
, when the lower surface
26
engages a flat surface
38
selective portions of the sole normally rest on the flat surface
38
. In this arrangement, as best illustrated in
FIGS. 4 and 6
, the lowermost portions of the various semi-cylinders engage the flat surface
38
with the forward portion of the cylinders
64
and
66
extending upwardly at the foremost portion of the sole and also, at the outer edges of the cylinders
52
,
54
and
56
. Relevant contours of the upper surface
24
and lower surface
26
in relation to the flat surface
38
define height distances of various portions of the upper from the flat surface
38
. In a preferred embodiment ratios of various heights of the upper surface
24
from the flat surface
38
are best illustrated in FIG.
6
. In a typical preferred embodiment the distance between the flat surface
38
and respective positions on the upper surface
24
are as follows: at the highest position of the upper periphery at the rear counter
44
, 41 millimeters; at the lower portion in the heel at approximately the cross-sectional position of
FIG. 12
, 10.5 millimeters; at the heel region at approximately the cross-sectional view of
FIG. 11
, 11 millimeters; at the instep region at the approximate cross-sectional position of
FIG. 10
, 13 millimeters; at the cross-sectional position of
FIG. 9
in the instep region, about 12.5 millimeters; at the crosssectional position in the foresole region at approximately
FIG. 8
, approximately 19 millimeters; at a position halfway between the cross-sectional views of
FIGS. 7 and 8
, approximately 21 millimeters; and, at the cross-sectional position in the foresole at
FIG. 7
, approximately 20 millimeters. These heights, on the medial position, may vary as illustrated in the lateral dimension as shown in
FIGS. 7 through 12
from the medial measurement as indicated above. Thus, it will be noted that the lower portion of the height from the flat-surface
38
occurs at the heel bed
20
just forward of the rear-counter with the high portion occurring between the cross-sectional views
7
and
8
. It will be noted that the relative curvature and height of the upper surface
24
is more curved in the instep region
18
as illustrated in
FIGS. 9 and 10
than in the heel
20
as illustrated in
FIGS. 11 and 12
, and much more so in the foresole regions as shown in
FIGS. 7 and 8
. The relative height of the upper periphery of the side-wall
25
to the height at the periphery of the upper surface
24
from the flat surface
38
is greater in the instep region
18
than either in the foresole portion
16
or the heel
20
as best illustrated by comparing
FIGS. 9 and 10
with
FIGS. 7 and 8
in the forepart region and FIG.
11
and
FIG. 12
in the heel. Thus, for example, the maximum height on the periphery
25
at the instep region is in the order of 37.5 millimeters whereas the relative maximum height in the foresole is in the order of 30 millimeters and in the heel in the order of 24.5 millimeters.
Thus comparing the height distances from the upper surfaces of the sole to flat surface or common resting surface
38
, the heel is in the order of 55% of the height at the foresole and the instep is in the order of 65% of the foresole.
Claims
- 1. A shoe sole construction to which a shoe upper is secured, said sole having an integrally formed foresole, instep region, heel and rear counter, with continuous integral upper and lower surfaces defining the sole as an integral unit, said sole, when positioned with its lower surface resting on a flat surface having a height at the mid-center line of the sole between the upper surface and the flat surface greater at the foresole than the heel, said rear counter extending upwardly to form a cradle for a heel of a foot resting on the sole, with the upper periphery of the rear counter from said flat surface having a maximum height above said flat surface that is in the order of at least twice said height at said foresole and with a height distance in said foresole greater at the center portion thereof than at both the forward and rear ends thereof.
- 2. A construction as set forth in claim 1 wherein a shoe upper is secured to the upper surface of the sole at the periphery thereof.
- 3. A shoe sole as set forth in claim 1 wherein the height distance from the upper surface of the sole at said heel to a common resting surface is in the order of 55% of the height distance at said foresole to the common resting surface.
- 4. A shoe sole as set forth in claim 1 wherein the height distance from the upper surface of the sole at the instep region to a common resting surface is in the order of 65% of the height distance at the foresole to the common resting surface.
- 5. A shoe sole as set forth in claim 3 wherein the height distance from the upper surface of the sole at the instep region to a common resting surface is in the order of 65% of the height distance at the foresole to the common resting surface.
- 6. A shoe sole construction to which a shoe upper is secured, said sole having an integrally formed foresole, instep region, heel and rear counter, with continuous integral upper and lower surfaces defining the sole as an integral unit, said sole, when positioned with its lower surface resting on a flat surface having a height at the mid-center line of the sole between the upper surface and the flat surface greater at the foresole than the heel, and with said rear counter extending upwardly to form a cradle for a heel of a foot resting on the sole, with the upper periphery of the rear counter having a maximum height above said flat surface that is in the order of at least three times said height at said heel and with a height distance in said foresole greater at the center portion thereof than at both the forward and rear ends thereof.
- 7. A shoe sole as set forth in claim 6 wherein said height of said rear counter above said flat surface is in the order of four times said height at said heel.
US Referenced Citations (5)
| Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
|
3964181 |
Holcombe, Jr. |
Jun 1976 |
A |
|
4934073 |
Robinson |
Jun 1990 |
A |
|
5491912 |
Snabb et al. |
Feb 1996 |
A |
|
5598645 |
Kaiser |
Feb 1997 |
A |
|
5771606 |
Litchfield et al. |
Jun 1998 |
A |
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
| Number |
Date |
Country |
| 9111124 |
Aug 1991 |
WO |