The present invention relates to a shoelace.
The shoelace in accordance with the invention finds a preferred application in the field of lace-up shoes, in particular sport shoes, and in particular running shoes, including nature or trail race shoes, and walking shoes, and may also be considered for city shoes, safety shoes, climbing shoes, etc.
Whether in the context of a sport practice or of a daily use, people tend to tighten the shoelaces of their shoes too much in particular in order to feel an accentuate holding of the foot. Furthermore, during a physical effort, such as running or walking, the foot swells naturally inside the shoe, by blood inflow, and the foot therefore becomes tightened too much by the shoelace.
Still, shoelaces tightened too much on a foot, whether because of a too strong initial tightening or because of a subsequent swelling of the foot, result in numerous annoyances.
The compression of the foot by a shoelace tightened too much may result in a compression of the blood and nerve vessels, with several negative consequences: heavy legs sensations, pins and needles sensations, tingling, pains at the calves, cramps, tears, sprains or contractures.
Furthermore, a shoelace tightened too much also prevents the foot arches from moving freely and results in hindering the movement of the foot during an activity.
In addition, a too tightened shoelace tends to rigidify the shoe, with as a potential consequence a Morton neuroma. This neuroma, also called the «Morton's disease», is a very painful affection which touches the interdigital nerve of the foot because of a too tightened foot.
In the shoelaces field are known the fabric-made shoelaces, for example made of polyester, nylon, cotton or linen, as known from the document U.S. Pat. No. 696,440, and the rubber-made shoelaces.
The first example of a fabric-made shoelace barely offers comfort for the foot. Indeed, throughout the day, or during a sport activity, the pressure of the foot increases, and the rigidity of the shoelace will make its support unpleasant and above all generating compression marks on the top-side of the foot, called the «instep».
The second example of a rubber-made shoelace has the drawback of compressing the foot too strongly because of a too high elastic return. Indeed, because of its elasticity, the carrier will tend to tighten too much his rubber-made shoelaces which will strongly compress the foot in the shoe.
The state of the art is also illustrated by the teaching of document U.S. 2006/0168785 which discloses a shoelace comprising an elastic core, in particular made of silicone, wrapped inside with a sheath made of a plastic material, paper, a fabric or elastic, and a friction element associated to the sheath. Particularly because of the presence of the sheath and the friction element, this shoelace has the same defects as the two aforementioned shoelaces, and thus does not offers comfort and holding adapted to avoid the problems of over-compression of the foot.
The disclosure provides a shoelace which takes into account the change of pressure of a foot when in activity in order to avoid any compression and thus to allow a good blood flow while comfortably holding the foot and offering an unrivaled comfort.
To this end, it proposes a shoelace for a shoe, of the type constituted by an elongate elastic band entirely made of silicone, said band having elastic properties according to which, by selecting at least one segment of said band, said segment having a constant cross-section and a length at rest of 5.0 centimeters, when said segment is stretched until reaching a stretched length of 10.0 centimeters and then released, said segment contracts and reaches a first released length comprised between 5.6 and 7.0 centimeters after a first time comprised between 0.1 and 1 second after the release, and reaches a second released length comprised between 5.0 and 5.6 centimeters after a second time comprised between 15 and 25 seconds after the release.
Thus, the invention is based on a shoelace comprising a silicone-made band having particular elastic return properties; these elastic properties depending on the transverse dimensions of the silicone-made band and of the selected silicone material. In other words, the band has transverse dimensions and is made of a silicone material selected so that the band has the elastic return properties defined hereinabove.
The Applicant has observed that such elastic properties guarantee a tensioned lacing, strongly held or pleasantly held, but never tightened so much that the foot is compressed. Thanks to such a silicone-made band, regardless of the tension, the silicone-made band of the shoelace will always offer an optimum and pleasant comfort which will keep still.
Furthermore, the silicone has a self-gripping character (by friction) which advantageously allows the knot and the loop to remain held and not be untied on their own, thereby avoiding an unexpected opening of the knot which would result in a fall. This self-gripping particularity also allows that the foot will always remain held, even with a broken portion of the shoelace.
Advantageously, the silicone-made band may be cut to the proper length, in order not to have too long shoelace and loops.
For more information, when the concerned segment is stretched until reaching a stretched length of 10.0 centimeters, this stretching is performed at a stretching speed comprised between 1.0 and 2.0 centimeters per second, and in particular between 1.2 and 1.6 centimeters per second.
For comparison, a conventional rubber-made shoelace which undergoes the above-described stretching/release test, has a released length of about 5.0 centimeters, namely a return to its initial length, after a time comprised between 0.1 and 1 second.
Another advantage of silicone is its resistance to the ultraviolet radiations of the solar radiation and also to thermal shocks, not to mention that this silicone-made band will not freeze below −40° C., and will always prove effective. According to a first embodiment, the band has a constant cross-section over at least 95% of its length, and in particular over substantially its entire length.
Such a band with a regular or almost regular cross-section over the entire length of the band, allows an easy manufacturing, in particular by injection.
In this first embodiment, the band advantageously has a first released length comprised between 6.6 and 7.0 centimeters, and a second released length comprised between 5.3 and 5.6 centimeters; these data being of course to be related with the aforementioned modus operandi in which, there is selected at least one segment having a length at rest of 5.0 centimeters, which is stretched until reaching a stretched length of 10.0 centimeters and then released.
According to a second embodiment, the band has at least three successive elongate sections comprising a section called central section surrounded by two sections called intermediate sections with the same lengths, the intermediate sections having the same constant cross-section over their entire respective lengths, and the central section having a cross-section constant over its entire length and different from the cross-section of the intermediate sections, where the central section has a first released length and a second released length greater than respectively the first released length and the second released length of the intermediate sections.
Thus, once laced in a conventional, and therefore symmetrical, manner, the central section is positioned at the start (or at the bottom) of the lacing area, then the two intermediate sections prolong the central section to the right and to the left, upwards, for a lacing at the instep; the central section having a elastic return weaker (in other words less rapid) than the two intermediate sections, a high or strong—or even rapid—elastic return reflecting a high capacity to rapidly return to the initial state, that is to say to rest. Thus, the two intermediate sections have a stronger (in other words more rapid) elastic return in order to guarantee a good holding at the instep, whereas the central section has a weaker (in other words less rapid) elastic return for a more firm lacing base.
In this manner, this band offers at least two distinct elasticity areas to the shoelace, with a lower area at the bottom of the shoelace (the central section) and an intermediate area at the instep (the intermediate sections).
In general, each section has a length of at least 100 millimeters, or even at least 150 millimeters, in order that each section fully participates in lacing with its own elastic properties, either at the start of the lacing (at the instep), or at the end of the lacing (at the lacing knot). In other words, these sections do not constitute artifices or aesthetic elements which do not act on the lacing. Similarly, the ratio between the length of the central section and the length of an intermediate section is greater than or equal to 0.8.
According to one possibility of the invention, the central section has a first released length comprised between 6.2 and 6.6 centimeters and a second released length comprised between 5.4 and 5.6 centimeters, and each intermediate section has a first released length comprised between 5.9 and 6.3 centimeters and a second released length comprised between 5.1 and 5.3 centimeters.
These values meet particularly well the expectations in terms of holding and comfort, though without compressing the foot.
According to another possibility, the central section has a substantially ellipsoidal cross-section having a major axis and a minor axis, and each intermediate section has a substantially rectangular cross-section having a long-side edge parallel to said major axis and a short-side edge parallel to said minor axis, where said minor axis is larger than said short-side edge and said major axis is substantially equivalent to said long-side edge.
Such a geometric shaping allows meeting the aforementioned requirements in terms of the elastic return, namely a central section having an elastic return weaker than the two intermediate sections.
According to one feature, the ratio between the length of the central section and the length of an intermediate section is comprised between 0.8 and 1.25.
Advantageously, the band has two sections called end sections with the same lengths and prolonging the intermediate sections on either side of the central section, the end sections having the same constant cross-section over their entire respective lengths, said cross-section of the end sections being different from the cross-sections of the central section and of the intermediate sections, where each end section has a first released length and a second released length respectively smaller than the first released length and the second released length of the intermediate sections.
Thus, these end sections are located at two opposite ends of the silicone-made band, and they serve to terminate the lacing with the closure loop of the shoelace which will be made by looping these two end sections. These end sections have elastic returns stronger (in other words more rapid) than the intermediate sections, for a tightening of the shoelace at the top portion which guarantees an enhanced holding.
In this manner, this band has five successive sections and offers three distinct elasticity areas to the shoelace, with a lower area (the central section), an intermediate area (the intermediate sections) and an upper area at the top portion of the shoelace (the end sections).
According to one feature, each end section has a first released length comprised between 5.6 and 6.0 centimeters and a second released length comprised between 5.0 and 5.1 centimeters.
According to another feature, the end section has a substantially circular cross-section with a given diameter, said diameter being smaller than the major axis of the substantially ellipsoidal cross-section of the central section.
In a particular embodiment, the ratio between the length of the end section and the length of a central section is comprised between 0.8 and 1.25.
According to another possibility, the central section has a first released length comprised between 5.9 and 6.3 centimeters and a second released length comprised between 5.1 and 5.3 centimeters, and each intermediate section has a first released length comprised between 5.6 and 6.0 centimeters and a second released length comprised between 5.0 and 5.1 centimeters.
These values also meet the expectations in terms of holding and comfort, though without compressing the foot.
According to another possibility, the central section has a substantially rectangular cross-section having a long-side edge and a short-side edge, and each intermediate section has a substantially circular cross-section with a given diameter, said diameter being smaller than said long-side edge.
Such a geometric shaping also allows meeting the aforementioned requirements in terms of elastic return, namely a central section having an elastic return weaker than the two intermediate sections.
Advantageously, the silicone material of the band has a Shore hardness A comprised between 50 and 90, and preferably a Shore hardness A comprised between 65 and 75.
This choice of hardness is particularly well adapted from the point of view of elastic return considering the dimensions of the band for a conventional shoelace, in order to meet the previously described requirements regarding the elastic return properties.
The invention also relates to a shoe equipped with a shoelace in accordance with the invention, such a shoelace being laced on the shoe by passing though lacing eyelets or hooks.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will appear upon reading the detailed description hereinafter, of two non-restrictive embodiments, made with reference to the appended figures in which:
With reference to
This elongate elastic band 1 is entirely made of silicone, and has a constant cross-section over substantially its entire length. This band 1 has a total length comprised between 700 millimeters and 1500 millimeters, in particular between 900 and 1200 millimeters.
With reference to
This band 1 may be obtained by injection of a silicone material, or even by molding.
Optionally, the ends 10 of the band 1 are beveled, in order to facilitate the passage through the lacing orifices provided on the shoe C.
With reference to
This elongate elastic band 2 is entirely made of silicone, and has at least five successive elongate sections comprising:
Thus, the band 2 successively presents, from the right to the left or vice versa, a first end section 22, followed by a first intermediate section 21, followed by the central section 20, followed by a second intermediate section 21, followed by a second end section 22. This band 2 may be obtained by molding of a silicone material.
The total length LT of this band 2 is comprised between 700 millimeters and 1500 millimeters, in particular between 900 and 1200 millimeters.
The central section 20 has:
The major axis G0 is comprised between 3.5 and 7.0 millimeters, and in particular between 4.0 and 5.0 millimeters, and the minor axis P0 is comprised between 2.5 and 3.5 millimeters, and in particular between 3.0 and 3.5 millimeters.
The two intermediate sections 21 have:
The long-side edge G1 is comprised between 3.5 and 7.0 millimeters, and in particular between 4.0 and 5.0 millimeters, and the short-side edge P1 is comprised between 1.5 and 3.0 millimeters, and in particular between 2.0 and 2.5 millimeters; the long-side edge G1 being substantially equivalent, or even equal, to the major axis G0, and the short-side edge P1 being smaller than the minor axis P0.
In the example given hereinabove, the length L1 of an intermediate section 21 is equivalent to the length L0 of the central section 20, but it is possible that these lengths are different. In general, it is possible that the ratio between the length L0 and the length L1 is comprised between 0.8 and 1.25.
The two end sections 22 have:
The diameter D2 is smaller than the major axis G0 and is comprised between 3.0 and 5.0 millimeters, in particular between 3.5 and 4.5 millimeters.
In the example given hereinabove, the length L2 of an end section 22 is greater than the length L0 of the central section 20, but it is possible to consider that these lengths are equivalent. In general, it is possible to consider that the ratio between the length L0 and the length L2 is comprised between 0.8 and 1.25.
It should also be noted that the central section 20 does not have the same cross-section as the two intermediate sections 21 and as the two end sections 22, and the two intermediate sections 21 do not have the same cross-section as the two end sections 22.
As is visible in
Pyramidal portions 25 are also provided between the intermediate sections 21 and, at one side, the central section 20 and, at the other side, the corresponding end section 22, thereby reinforcing the interfacing areas between the intermediate sections 21 and the adjacent sections 20, 22.
The following description relates to the elastic return properties of the two silicone-made bands 1, 2.
In particular, it is advantageous for the invention that the used silicone material has the following characteristics:
With reference to
As example, the first time t1 is comprised between 0.1 and 1 second, and the second time t2 is comprised between 15 and 25 seconds.
In the tests carried out with the bands 1, 2, t1 is set to 1 second and t2 is set to 22 seconds.
As regards the first shoelace 100, the band 1 has a first released length LR1 comprised between 6.6 and 7.0 centimeters, and a second released length LR2 comprised between 5.3 and 5.7 centimeters.
As regards the second shoelace 200, the geometric and dimensional differences of their cross-sections between the sections 20, 21, 22 of the band 2 is reflected in differences of the elastic return properties wherein:
In general, the band 2 is shaped so that the central section 20 has a first released length LR1 and a second released length LR2 respectively greater than the first released length LR1 and the second released length LR2 of the intermediate sections 21, and each end section 22 has a first released length LR1 and a second released length LR2 respectively smaller than the first released length LR1 and the second released length LR2 of the intermediate sections 21.
In other words, the central section 20 has the greatest released lengths, whereas the end sections 22 have the smallest released lengths, the intermediate sections 21 having intermediate released lengths.
As is visible in
Thus, each section 20, 21, 22 has its own elasticity to confer optimum comfort and holding, though without compressing the foot, even after swelling, where the central section 10 (the most firm) allows tightening the shoelace firmly at the toes, the intermediate sections 21 for a stable lacing without tension at the instep in order to offer a good vein return and a good holding, and the end sections 22 (more flexible) for a firm but non-compressive tightening at the ankle.
Of course, the implementation examples mentioned hereinabove are not restrictive and other improvements and details may be added to the shoelace according to the invention, without departing from the scope of the invention where for example other shapes of the cross-sections and/or other dimensions may be considered for example.
As example, it is possible to consider having a band with three sections, rather than five sections, comprising:
In this embodiment with three sections (without counting the possible endings 23 and/or pyramidal portions 25), the ratio between the length of the central section and the length of an end section is comprised between 2.4 and 3.75.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14 02457 | Oct 2014 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2015/052904 | 10/28/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/066959 | 5/6/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
696440 | Holland | Apr 1902 | A |
931949 | Morrow | Aug 1909 | A |
2141801 | Taft | Dec 1938 | A |
2306515 | Wright | Dec 1942 | A |
2477151 | Stapleton | Jul 1949 | A |
5111558 | Ridley | May 1992 | A |
D406692 | Shin | Mar 1999 | S |
5946779 | Chen | Sep 1999 | A |
6513210 | Gonzalez | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7798155 | Schweers | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8523932 | Roeder | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8931146 | Stanev | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9955754 | Liu | May 2018 | B2 |
20040237348 | Lacey | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050125971 | Lee | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050217089 | Lin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260550 | Wilk | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060168785 | Kraft | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060277728 | Ho | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20120232655 | Lorrison | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130255045 | Gonzalez | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140007392 | Kajiwara | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140215777 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150128389 | Carney | May 2015 | A1 |
20160270481 | Harden | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170065026 | Wu | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170251763 | Liu | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170367442 | Tsai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180116341 | Cogliandro | May 2018 | A1 |
20180140051 | Jugeau | May 2018 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jul. 8, 2016 re: Application No. PCT/FR2015/052904; pp. 1-2; citing: US 2006/168785 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 696,440 A and US 2004/237348 A1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170318907 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |