1. Field of the Invention
In general, the present invention relates to counterbalance systems for windows that prevent open window sashes from closing under the force of their own weight. More particularly, the present invention system relates to counterbalance systems for tilt-in windows that use curl springs to create a counterbalancing force.
2. Description of the Prior Art
There are many types and styles of windows. One of the most common types of windows is the double-hung window. A double-hung window is the most common window found in traditional home construction. A double-hung window consists of an upper window sash and a lower window sash. Either the upper window sash or the lower window sash can be selectively opened and closed by a person sliding the sash up and down within the window frame.
A popular variation of the double-hung window is the tilt-in double-hung window. Tilt-in double-hung windows have sashes that can be selectively moved up and down. However, the sashes can also be selectively tilted into the home so that the exterior of the sashes can be cleaned from within the home.
The sash of double-hung windows has a weight that depends upon the materials used to make that window sash and the size of the window sash. Since the sashes of a double-hung window are free to move up and down in the frame of a window, some counterbalancing system must be used to prevent the window sashes from always moving to the bottom of the window frame under the force of their own weight.
For many years counterbalance weights were hung next to the window frame in weight wells. The weights were attached to the window sash using a string or chain that passed over a pulley at the top of the window frame. The weights counterbalanced the weight of the window sashes. As such, when the sashes were moved in the window frame they had a neutral weight and friction would hold them in place.
The use of weight wells prevents insulation from being packed tightly around a window frame. Furthermore, the use of counterbalance weights on chains or strings cannot be adapted well to tilt-in double-hung windows. Accordingly, as tilt-in windows were being developed, alternative counterbalance systems were developed that were contained within the confines of the window frame and did not interfere with the tilt action of the tilt-in windows.
Modern tilt-in double-hung windows are primarily manufactured in one of two ways. There are vinyl frame windows and wooden frame windows. In the window manufacturing industry, different types of counterbalance systems are traditionally used for vinyl frame windows and wooden frame windows. The present invention is mainly concerned with the structure of vinyl framed windows. As such, the prior art concerning vinyl framed windows is herein addressed.
Vinyl framed, tilt-in, double-hung windows are typically manufactured with tracks along the inside of the window frame. Brake shoe mechanisms, commonly known as “shoes” in the window industry, are placed in the tracks and ride up and down within the tracks. Each sash of the window has two tilt pins or tilt posts that extend into the shoes and cause the shoes to ride up and down in the tracks as the window sashes are opened or closed.
The shoes serve two purposes. First, the shoes contain a brake mechanism that is activated when a window sash is tilted inwardly away from the window frame. The shoe therefore locks the base of the sash in place and prevents the base of the sash from moving up or down in the window frame once the sash is titled open. Second, the shoes support curl springs. Curl springs are constant force coil springs that supply a constant retraction force when unwound. Traditionally, curl springs are placed within the shoe in the same way a metal tape is placed within the housing of a tape measure. One end of the curl spring is anchored to the frame of the window while the main body of the curl spring is wound inside of the shoe. As the shoes move within the tracks, the curl spring rotates inside the shoe. Often as the curl spring rotates in the shoe, the curl spring moves around within the confines of the shoe and makes an undesirable noise.
Single curl springs are used on windows with light sashes. Multiple curl springs are used on windows with heavy sashes. The curl springs provide the counterbalance force to the window sashes needed to maintain the sashes in place. The counterbalance force of the curl springs is transferred to the window sashes through the structure of the shoes.
Prior art shoes that contain braking mechanisms and support counterbalance curl springs are exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 6,378,169 to Batten, entitled Mounting Arrangement For Constant Force Spring Balance; U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,793 to Westfall, entitled Sash Shoe System For Curl Spring Window Balance; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,353,548 to Westfall, entitled Curl Spring Shoe Based Window Balance System.
Prior art “shoes” for curl spring counterbalance systems are complex assemblies. The shoes must contain a brake mechanism strong enough to lock a sash in place. Furthermore, the shoes must engage and retain the end of at least one strong curl spring. Prior art shoes are always in contact with the tracks on the sides of the window frame. Accordingly, as wear, dirt and grime accumulate over time, it often becomes more difficult for the shoes to move up and down. The “shoe” of a window assembly is therefore the first part of a window assembly to fail and require replacement. A shoe can fail either by failing to smoothly move within the window frame track or by failing to lock in place when a window sash is tilted open.
Another disadvantage of prior art shoes is that the shoes take space in the tracks on the side of the window sashes. Accordingly, the window sash cannot be fully opened to the top of the window track because of the physical presence of the shoes. Building codes exist that define the minimal size of a window opening in many applications. The minimal size opening is required so that people can pass through the open window in case of an emergency. Accordingly, due to the presence of prior art shoes, windows that have sashes that are larger than building code requirements may not be able to open to a size that meets the building code requirement.
A need therefore exists in the field of vinyl, tilt-in, double-hung windows, for a counterbalance system that eliminates the need for shoes. As such, window assemblies can be made more reliable, less noisy, less expensive and with larger effective openings. This need is met by the present invention as described and claimed below.
The present invention is a counterbalance system for a tilt-in window and its associated method of operation. The system uses wound spring elements to provide a counterbalancing force to the sashes of the window. The wound springs are configured to define open central regions. Hubs are attached to tilt posts that extend from the sashes of the window. The hubs extend into the open central regions of the wound springs, thereby supporting the wound springs within the frame of the window. A brake structure is disposed between the wound springs and the tilt posts. The brake structure automatically locks the tilt posts into fixed positions as the sashes of the tilt-in window are tilted inwardly. The brake structure creates two braking actions. First, the brake structure itself creates an interference fit within the frame of the window as the sashes tilt. Second, the brake structure displaces the wound spring and causes the wound spring to press against the frame of the window as the sashes tilt. The two separate braking actions create a strong and effective brake for the tilt posts of the sashes without the use of traditional window brake shoe assemblies.
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following description of an exemplary embodiment thereof, considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
A tilt post 20 extends outwardly from either side of the base of each sash 11, 12. The tilt posts 20 extend into the tracks 18 in the vertical sides 16 of the window frame 14. As is later explained in greater detail, a brake head 22 is disposed at the tip of the tilt post 20 within the track 18. The brake head 22 serves two purposes. First, the brake head 22 serves as a brake mechanism that locks the tilt post 20 in place within the track 18 when a sash 11, 12 is tilted inwardly. Second, the brake head 22 serves as a hub for a curl spring 24, wherein a curl spring 24 passes around the brake head 22.
The curl spring 24 rotates about the brake head 22. The free end of the curl spring 24 is affixed to the window frame 14 higher along the track 18. Accordingly, the curl spring 24 applies an upward counterbalance force to the tilt post 20 that counteracts the weight of the sash 12.
Referring to
Referring to
The brake head 22 is a structure that passes over the end of the tilt post 20. A recess (shown in
The brake head 22 is a structure that includes flanges 30 and a cylindrical hub 32 that extends behind the flanges 30. The purpose and function of the flanges 30 is later explained. The cylindrical hub 32 is sized to pass into an annular spring bearing 34. As such, the annular spring bearing 34 is free to rotate around the cylindrical hub 32 of the brake head 22. The spring bearing 34 passes into the center of a standard window curl spring 24. The spring bearing 34 may be slotted so that the spring bearing 34 can be momentarily compressed when inserted into the center of the curl spring 24. Once inserted into the center of the curl spring 24, the spring bearing 34 expands so that no space exists between the exterior of the spring bearing 34 and the interior of the curl spring 24.
In the embodiment of
Referring to
The flanges 30 above and below the cylindrical hub 32 have a stepped structure. Each of the flanges 30 have a distal edge 36 at their tip and a second edge 38 interposed between the distal edge 36 and the center of the hub 32. The flanges 30 have a first thickness near the distal edge 36. Further down from each distal edge 36 is a step that forms the second edge 38. Accordingly, below the second edge 38, the flanges 30 are thicker and lay flush with the front end of the cylindrical hub 32. However, above the second edges 38, the flanges 30 are recessed. The flanges 30 are further thinned near the distal edges 36 by the presence of a bevel 37 that leads to the distal edge 36.
Referring now to
It will be understood that when the sash 12 (
Referring to
As the brake head 22 is being rotated in the track 18 to cause an interference fit, yet another braking action is occurring. As the brake head 22 rotates in the track 18, the distal edges 36 of the flanges 30 enter the inside of the track 18. Due to the thickness of the flanges 30, the cylindrical hub 32 is driven farther into the track 18 as the distal edges 36 of the flange 30 rotate into the inside of the track 18.
The cylindrical hub 32 supports the curl spring 24 within the track 18. As the cylindrical hub 32 is driven farther into the interior of the track 18 by the entrance of the flanges 30 into the track 18, the curl spring 24 is driven further into the interior of the track 18. The brake head 22 is sized so that as the flanges 30 turn into the track 18, the curl spring 24 becomes compressed between the rear wall 46 of the track 18 and the flanges 30 on the brake head 22. The combined width of the curl spring 24 and the flanges 30 of the brake head 22 in the track 18 is wider than the track 18. Thus, an interference fit is created when the brake head 22 is rotated and the flanges 30 enter the track 18. The interference fit biases the curl spring 24 against the rear wall 46 of the track 18. This prevents the curl spring 24 from moving in the track 18. The abutment against the rear wall 46 of the track 18 also hinders the curl spring 24 from winding or unwinding.
Accordingly, when the brake head 22 is rotated from the free moving orientation of
From the description of the function of the brake head 22, it will be understood that the brake head 22 itself is a solid object with no moving parts. The brake head 22 is attached to the tilt post 20 and rotates with the tilt post 20. When in a first orientation, the brake head 22 moves freely in the track 18 of the window. When rotated, the brake head 22 creates multiple interferences with both the structure of the track 18 and the curl spring 24 in the track. However, since the brake head 22 itself is a solid, one-piece structure with no moving parts, it is highly reliable and resists wear much better than prior art brake shoes that contain complex moving brake assemblies.
It will be understood that the embodiments of the present invention counterbalance system that are described and illustrated herein are merely exemplary and a person skilled in the art can make many variations to the embodiment shown without departing from the scope of the present invention. All such variations, modifications and alternate embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3399490 | Hettinger | Sep 1968 | A |
3842540 | Anderson | Oct 1974 | A |
4227345 | Durham, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4364199 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4452012 | Deal | Jun 1984 | A |
4837976 | Westfall et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4930254 | Valentin | Jun 1990 | A |
5157808 | Sterner, Jr. | Oct 1992 | A |
5210976 | Cripps | May 1993 | A |
5353548 | Westfall | Oct 1994 | A |
5452495 | Briggs | Sep 1995 | A |
5463793 | Westfall | Nov 1995 | A |
5855092 | Raap et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6032417 | Jakus et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058653 | Slocomb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6119398 | Yates, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6378169 | Batten et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6658794 | Hansel et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040206001 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |