The present invention relates to a shoe, and more preferably a shoe including a sole and an upper.
Conventionally, shoes composed of a mesh-like material, including an upper formed of a matrix layer having a stretchability due to a mesh-like structure have been known (Patent Document 1 below). A shoe upper of Patent Document 1 provides a wearer with a comfortable fit (fit feeling) by having the stretchability so as not to restrict the movement of a foot during exercise.
In general, it is considered that a shoe upper can suppress a slippage between a shoe and a foot by holding the foot when the direction of a foot force is suddenly changed while a sole contacts the ground, for example when a user stops the movement of the foot. However, since the shoe of Patent Document 1 includes an upper formed of a stretchable matrix layer so as not to restrict the movement of the foot, it is thought that the slippage between the shoe and the foot cannot be prevented sufficiently when the direction of the foot force is suddenly changed while the sole contacts the ground. Accordingly, the shoe of Patent Document 1 seems to have a problem of insufficient ability to hold the foot as a result of the slippage between the shoes and the foot.
In order to solve the above-mentioned conventional problem, the present invention provides a shoe having proper holding properties while maintaining fitting properties.
A shoe of the present invention includes a sole and an upper. The upper is composed of a fabric having a knit structure, and includes at least one fiber reinforcement portion in a predetermined position of the upper integrally. The fiber reinforcement portion is formed of a float stitch with a plurality of float stitch yarns.
The shoe of the present invention imparts a proper fit to the wearer's foot by forming an upper composed of a fabric having a knit structure, because the upper composed of the fabric having the knit structure stretches properly. Also, in the case where the direction of foot force is suddenly changed while the sole contacts the ground, the shoe can hold a desired predetermined position of the foot by the fiber reinforcement portion situated in a predetermined position of the upper integrally. Moreover, by having the fiber reinforcement portion formed of the float stitch with a plurality of float stitch yarns, when the fabric having the knit structure is appropriately stretched, the tension of the float stitch yarns of the float stitch can be raised and as a result the shoe can hold the foot tightly. Unlike the fiber reinforcement portion made of materials such as a resin or a rubber, the fiber reinforcement portion formed of the float stitch allows the upper to have the proper holding properties. By doing so, the present invention can provides the shoe having the proper holding properties while maintaining the fitting properties. In addition, the manufacturing cost will be lower by introducing the upper composed of the knit structure, and the fiber reinforcement portion formed of the float stitch.
The present inventors arrived at an idea of producing a shoe by attaching a sole to an upper composed of a knit structure. However, since the upper composed of the knit structure has fitting properties but is poor in holding properties, it is difficult to use such a shoe as it is for sports. Then, the present inventors conceived the idea of integrally forming fiber reinforcement portion in a predetermined (specific) position of the upper composed of the knit structure. From such an idea, the present inventors conducted numerous studies and as a result the shoe of the present invention, especially suitable for use in sports, is accomplished.
The present invention relates to a shoe including a sole and an upper. Although any sole for use in shoes may be used, it is preferable to use soles for use in sports shoes having cushioning properties and repulsion. An inner sole may be contained in the inside of the upper.
To begin with, the present inventors examined a suitable position for the fiber reinforcement portion by analyzing the extension and contraction of the skin during running for example, in order to produce the shoe of the present invention.
A: A position to hold cuneiform bones, a cuboid bone and a navicular bone
B: A position to hold a lower part of a lateral malleolus, a lower part of a medial malleolus and an upper part of a calcaneal bone
C: A position to hold at least one part of each of a first metatarsal bone to a fifth metatarsal bone
The shoe upper of the present invention is composed of the fabric having a knit structure, in which fiber reinforcement portions 1 to 3 are situated in predetermined positions of the upper integrally, and the fiber reinforcement portions 1 to 3 are formed of a float stitch (also called as a welt knitting) with a plurality of float stitch yarns. In the case of circular knitting for example, this knit structure can be achieved by a float stitch structure. In the fiber reinforcement portions 1 to 3, the float stitch yarns are preferably arranged on the inner side of the shoe. The float stitch can be formed integrally with a base knitted fabric having the knit structure, and has excellent shape stability and durability. The base knitted fabric may be formed of any one of a tuck stitch, a back tuck stitch or a jersey stitch, or a combination of these. The float stitch yarns are arranged on the inner side of the shoe for the sake of improving appearance in design and ensuring safety. An example of the float stitch is shown in
It is preferable that a stress in a portion of the float stitch is 1.2 times or more greater than a stress in a portion of a base knit when a strain ratio (stretch ratio) of the portion of the float stitch in a float stitch yarn direction is 1 (two times the length before measurement). A more preferable ratio of stress in the portion of the float stitch to that in the portion of the base knit is 1.5 times or more. The portion of the float stitch having the above-mentioned ranges has a sufficient reinforcement effect and thus a deformation of the shoe can be prevented when forces from different directions are applied to the foot, and can secure the safety of the foot.
It is preferable that the fiber yarn used for the fabric having the knit structure is a fiber yarn including an elastic yarn. The elastic yarn is preferably at least one selected from a polyurethane-based elastic yarn and a polyester-based elastic yarn, because they are highly stretchable and suitable for the upper to fit in with the foot. The elastic yarn may be used as a bare yarn arranged in parallel with a non-elastic yarn (rigid yarn), or may be used as a covered yarn with its surface covered with a polyester fiber, a nylon fiber, an acrylic fiber, wool, cotton etc.
The fabric having the knit structure can be knitted by using circular knitting machines manufactured by LONATI™ S.p.A, for example. Among these, a circular knitting machine having a diameter of 3.75 inch, and 132 or 144 needles is particularly suitable for the present invention
The shoe in one embodiment of the present invention includes a substantially sock-shaped upper composed of the fabric having the knit structure as shown in
The shoe in another embodiment of the present invention includes a substantially sock-shaped upper composed of the fabric having the knit structure as shown in
The shoe of the present invention is suitable as various sport shoes such as marathon shoes, running shoes, walking shoes, and as ordinary shoes such as town shoes.
Hereinafter, the shoe of the present invention will be described on the basis of drawings. In the following drawings, the same reference numerals denote the same components.
The fiber reinforcement portion 23 is provided in a position corresponding to one part of each of cuneiform bones, a cuboid bone and a navicular bone of the user when the shoe of this embodiment is worn by the user. The fiber reinforcement portion 24 is provided in a position corresponding to the lower part of the lateral malleolus, the lower part of the medial malleolus, and the upper part of the calcaneus. These fiber reinforcement portions 23 and 24 correspond to a part of the user's footwhere the degree of extension and contraction of the skin of the foot is smaller than any other parts thereof when the user takes exercise. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the impairment of foot comfort when the foot is held by the fiber reinforcement portions 23 and 24, since there is a small change in a friction force or a pressure caused by the extension and contraction of the skin. The fiber reinforcement portion 25 is provided in a position corresponding to at least one part of each of the first metatarsal bone to the fifth metatarsal bone on the tiptoe side so as to cover the first metatarsal bone, the second metatarsal bone, the third metatarsal bone, the fourth metatarsal bone, and the fifth metatarsal bone. The fiber reinforcement portion 25 is particularly capable of holding the tiptoe side of the foot sufficiently even when the direction of foot force is changed suddenly to a width direction (foot width direction) of the foot. The fiber reinforcement portion 25 has a first gap 26a configured to avoid the area covering a head part of the first metatarsal bone and a second gap 26b configured to avoid the area covering a head part of the fifth metatarsal bone.
An opening 29 of the sock-shaped upper 21 is reinforced by folding the fabric back inwardly. The upper 21 is formed 40-90% smaller than that at the time of being assembled into the shoe so as to be stretched and integrated into the shoe at the time of assembly. By forming the shoe in this way, it is possible to enhance the fitting properties of the upper 21. When the length of the upper 21 in the stationary state is defined as 1, it is preferred that the upper 21 after being assembled into the shoe stretches in a range from 1.1 to 2.5 times.
Next, the present invention is further specifically described by way of an example. It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the example.
face yarn: the following a
back yarn: the following b and the following rubber yarn
knit structure: back tuck stitch+float stitch
face yarn: the following a
back yarn: the following b and the following rubber yarn
knit structure: back tuck stitch
a: polyester (PET) multifilament yarn having a fineness of 111 decitex (100 d)−48 filaments/2×3.
b: single covered yarn in which polyurethane yarn having a fineness of 33 decitex (30 d) is single covered with polyester (PET) yarn having a fineness of 83 decitex (75 d)
rubber yarn: double covered yarn in which polyurethane yarn having a fineness of 289 decitex (260 d) is double covered with polyester (PET) yarn having a fineness of 83 decitex (75 d)
A circular knitting machine manufactured by LONATI™, S.p.A having a diameter of 3.75 inch, and 132 or 144 needles.
The sock-shaped upper as shown in
An upper (body), a reinforcement portion of the opening of the shoe, and a sole were prepared.
(a) Preparation
The adhesive surface side of the sole, which was to be adhered to the reinforcement portions of the upper and the opening of the shoe, was coated with a primer and dried. The primer was applied to the sole so as to improve the adhesion of the adhesive to the sole. In the same way, the adhesive surface side of the reinforcement portion of the opening of the shoe, which was to be adhered to the sole, was primer coated and dried.
(b) Adhesion of the Sole and the Reinforcement Portion of the Opening of the Shoe
A water-soluble adhesive was applied to the adhesive surface of the sole (which was to be adhered to the reinforcement portion of the opening of the shoe) and the adhesive surface of the reinforcement portion of the opening of the shoe (which was to be adhered to the sole) and the sole and the reinforcement portion of the opening of the shoe were crimped.
(c) Adhesion of the Sole and the Upper
A last was inserted into the upper, a water-soluble adhesive was applied to the adhesive surface of the upper (which was to be adhered to the sole) and the adhesive surface of the sole (which was to be adhered to the upper), the adhesive was dried by heating, the upper and the sole were crimped and were dried for half a day at room temperature, dust was removed by the shoe and a shoelace was attached. Then, the shoe was cleaned and completed.
The shoe of
The result of fitting test shows that the shoe of an example of the present invention exhibited a superior fit. The holding properties of the shoe of an example of the present invention were equivalent to those of the conventional running shoe.
The shoe of the present invention is suitable as various sport shoes such as marathon shoes, running shoes, and walking shoes, and also as ordinary shoes such as town shoes.
1 fiber reinforcement portion
2 fiber reinforcement portion
3 fiber reinforcement portion
18 face yarn
19 back yarn
20 float stitch yarn
21 upper
23 fourth fiber reinforcement portion
24 first fiber reinforcement portion
25 second fiber reinforcement portion
30 third fiber reinforcement portion
31, 34 shoes
32 sole
33 upper material
35 reinforcement sheet
36 shoelace
41 plain stitch
42 double back yarn tuck stitch
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-204626 | Sep 2013 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2014/070875 | 8/7/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/045639 | 4/2/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2102368 | Martel | Dec 1937 | A |
2147197 | Glidden | Feb 1939 | A |
2586045 | Hoza | Feb 1952 | A |
4109492 | Roberts | Aug 1978 | A |
4317292 | Melton | Mar 1982 | A |
5996189 | Wang | Dec 1999 | A |
6286151 | Lambertz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6931762 | Dua | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7192411 | Gobet | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7677061 | Mori | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7721575 | Yokoyama | May 2010 | B2 |
D624300 | Hollingsworth | Sep 2010 | S |
7971280 | Kaneda | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996924 | Wright | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20030230121 | Yokoyama | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050076536 | Hatfield et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050262739 | McDonald et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268491 | McDonald et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060059721 | Hatfield et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061012 | Hatfield et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060162190 | Nishiwaki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060283042 | Greene et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070094896 | Hatfield et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070180730 | Greene et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080022553 | McDonald et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090126081 | Lambertz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090126230 | McDonald et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090165190 | Araki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090223004 | Greene et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241374 | Sato et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090293314 | Dekovic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100154256 | Dua | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110041362 | Nishiwaki et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110107501 | Kawahara | May 2011 | A1 |
20120030965 | Greene et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120102625 | Klein | May 2012 | A1 |
20120159815 | Dekovic et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120180195 | Shull | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120216423 | Lyden | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233882 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120318026 | Dua et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000159 | Hatfield et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025157 | Wan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145652 | Podhajny et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130239438 | Dua | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130298425 | McDonald et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318837 | Dua et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140068968 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140230277 | Dua et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237855 | Podhajny et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140238081 | Meir | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140238083 | Meir | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245639 | Dua et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140245643 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140373288 | Greene et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150000164 | Dekovic et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150068065 | McDonald et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150143641 | Hatfield et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150208753 | Dua et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216255 | Podhajny | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6-038608 | May 1994 | JP |
2004-105323 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2010-031437 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-042270 | Feb 2010 | JP |
4447559 | Apr 2010 | JP |
4620677 | Jan 2011 | JP |
4918571 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012-512698 | Jun 2012 | JP |
5026712 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2015066280 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2009122821 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2012125473 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012166244 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding European patent application No. 14847975.1, dated May 17, 2017, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160174660 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |