Patent Application
20110040061
[Not Applicable]
[Not Applicable]
The presently described technology relates to a new class of polypropylenes.
Polypropylene has become more and more attractive for many different commercial applications. One reason might be that new developed processes based on single-site-catalyst systems open the possibility to tailor new polypropylenes for demanding end-applications which has been not possible for a long time. Quite often such new polypropylenes based on single-site-catalyst systems are employed in case materials with a high stiffness are required. Moreover the amount of xylene solubles compared to conventional Zieglar-Natta products can be significantly lowered which opens the possibility to apply polypropylene in sensitive areas as in the field of medicine or food packaging. However another factor which must be considered when developing new materials is whether they can be produced with reasonable effort. High output rates along with a minimum of energy supply are appreciated (inter alia the polypropylene shall be formable at low temperatures). However normally better process properties are paid with inferior material properties. Thus there must be always found a balance between processability and end-product properties. Up to know there is still the desire to develop polypropylenes which can be used in high demanding applications requiring good mechanical properties as high temperature resistance and stiffness, as well as high levels of purity. On the other hand said polypropylenes shall be easily processable.
Hence the object of the present technology is to provide a polypropylene having good process properties, such as low processing temperature and high process stability, in combination with good mechanical properties such as high stiffness and high purity, i.e. rather low amounts of extractable fractions.
The finding of the present technology is to provide a polypropylene with improved balance between mechanical and process properties by introducing a specific degree of short-chain branching and a specific amount of non-crystalline areas.
Hence, the present technology is related to a polypropylene having
a) xylene solubles (XS) of at least 0.5 wt.-% and
b) a strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) of at least 0.15 measured by a deformation rate dε/dt of 1.00 s−1 at a temperature of 180° C., wherein the strain hardening index (SHI) is defined as the slope of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the tensile stress growth function (lg(ηE+)) as function of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the Hencky strain (lg(ε)) in the range of the Hencky strains between 1 and 3.
Surprisingly, it has been found that polypropylenes with such characteristics have superior properties compared to the polypropylenes known in the art. Especially, the inventive polypropylenes show a high process stability at low process temperatures. Moreover and surprisingly the inventive polypropylene has in addition good mechanical properties such as a high stiffness expressed in tensile modulus.
In certain embodiments of the present technology a polypropylene material is provided, the polypropylene material comprising xylene solubles of at least 0.5 percent by weight, and having a strain hardening index of at least 0.15 as measured by a deformation rate of 1.00 s−1 at a temperature of 180° C. In certain embodiments, the strain hardening index is defined as the slope of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the tensile stress growth function as function of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the Hencky strain for the range of the Hencky strains between 1 and 3. The polypropylene may have xylene solubles in the range of 0.5 to 1.5 percent by weight. In certain embodiments, the polypropylene has a strain hardening index in the range of 0.15 to 0.30. In certain embodiments, the polypropylene has a melting point of at least 148° C.
Certain embodiments of the present technology present a polypropylene as described above, wherein the polypropylene has a multi-branching index of at least 0.10. The multi-branching index is defined as the slope of strain hardening index as function of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the Hencky strain rate, defined as log(dε/dt) for this, wherein: dε/dt is the deformation rate; ε is the Hencky strain; and the strain hardening index is measured at a temperature of 180° C. The strain hardening index is defined as the slope of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the tensile stress growth function as function of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the Hencky strain for the range of the Hencky strains between 1 and 3. In certain embodiments, the polypropylene has a branching index of less than 1.00. The polypropylene may be multimodal or unimodal.
Certain embodiments of the present technology provide a process for the preparation of a polypropylene using a catalyst system of low porosity, comprising a symmetric catalyst; wherein the catalyst system has a porosity, measured according to DIN 66135 of less than 1.40 ml/g. The polypropylene prepared has xylene solubles of at least 0.5 percent by weight; and a strain hardening index of at least 0.15 measured by a deformation rate of 1.00 s−1 at a temperature of 180° C. The strain hardening index is defined as the slope of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the tensile stress growth function as function of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the Hencky strain in the range of the Hencky strains between 1 and 3.
A first requirement of the present technology is that the polypropylene has xylene solubles of same extent, i.e. of at least 0.50 wt.-% (percent by weight). Xylene solubles are the part of the polymer soluble in cold xylene determined by dissolution in boiling xylene and letting the insoluble part crystallize from the cooling solution (for the method see below in the experimental part). The xylene solubles fraction contains polymer chains of low stereo-regularity and is an indication for the amount of non-crystalline areas. Hence it is preferred that the xylene solubles are more than 0.60 wt.-%. On the other hand too high levels of xylene solubles are detrimental for some applications like food packing as they represent potential contamination risk. Accordingly it is preferred that the xylene solubles are not more than 1.50 wt.-%, still more preferably not more than 1.35 wt.-% and yet more preferably not more than 1.00 wt.-%. In preferred embodiments the xylene solubles are in the range of 0.50 to 1.50 wt.-%, yet more preferably in the range of 0.60 to 1.35 wt.-%, and still more preferably in the range of 0.60 to 1.00 wt.-%.
The new polypropylenes are characterized in particular by extensional melt flow properties. The extensional flow, or deformation that involves the stretching of a viscous material, is the dominant type of deformation in converging and squeezing flows that occur in typical polymer processing operations. Extensional melt flow measurements are particularly useful in polymer characterization because they are very sensitive to the molecular structure of the polymeric system being tested. When the true strain rate of extension, also referred to as the Hencky strain rate, is constant, simple extension is said to be a “strong flow” in the sense that it can generate a much higher degree of molecular orientation and stretching than flows in simple shear. As a consequence, extensional flows are very sensitive to crystallinity and macro-structural effects, such as short-chain branching, and as such can be far more descriptive with regard to polymer characterization than other types of bulk rheological measurement which apply shear flow.
Accordingly one requirement is that the polypropylene has strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) of at least 0.15, more preferred of at least 0.20, yet more preferred the strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) is in the range of 0.15 to 0.30, like 0.15 to below 0.30, and still yet more preferred in the range of 0.15 to 0.29. In a further embodiment it is preferred that the strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) is in the range of 0.20 to 0.30, like 0.20 to below 0.30, more preferred in the range of 0.20 to 0.29.
The strain hardening index is a measure for the strain hardening behavior of the polypropylene melt. Moreover values of the strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) of more than 0.10 indicate a non-linear polymer, i.e. a short-chain branched polymer. In the present technology, the strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) is measured by a deformation rate dε/dt of 1.00 s−1 at a temperature of 180° C. for determining the strain hardening behavior, wherein the strain hardening index (SHI@1 s−1) is defined as the slope of the tensile stress growth function ηE+ as a function of the Hencky strain ε on a logarithmic scale between 1.00 and 3.00 (see
the Hencky strain rate {dot over (ε)}H is defined by the formula:
“L0” is the fixed, unsupported length of the specimen sample being stretched which is equal to the centerline distance between the master and slave drums;
“R” is the radius of the equi-dimensional windup drums; and
“Ω” is a constant drive shaft rotation rate.
In turn the tensile stress growth function ηE+ is defined by the formula:
the Hencky strain rate {dot over (ε)}H is defined as for the Hencky strain ε;
“F” is the tangential stretching force;
“R” is the radius of the equi-dimensional windup drums;
“T” is the measured torque signal, related to the tangential stretching force “F”;
“A” is the instantaneous cross-sectional area of a stretched molten specimen;
“A0” is the cross-sectional area of the specimen in the solid state (i.e. prior to melting);
“ds” is the solid state density and;
“dM” the melt density of the polymer.
In addition, it is preferred that the polypropylene shows strain rate thickening which means that the strain hardening increases with extension rates. Similarly to the measurement of SHI@1 s−1, a strain hardening index (SHI) can be determined at different strain rates. A strain hardening index (SHI) is defined as the slope of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the tensile stress growth function ηE+, lg(ηE+), as function of the logarithm to the basis 10 of the Hencky strain ε, lg(ε), between Hencky strains 1.00 and 3.00 at a temperature of 180° C., wherein a SHI@0.1 s−1 is determined with a deformation rate {dot over (ε)}H of 0.10 s−1, a SHI@0.3 s−1 is determined with a deformation rate {dot over (ε)}H of 0.30 s−1, a SHI@3.0 s−1 is determined with a deformation rate {dot over (ε)}H of 3.00 s−1, a SHI@10.0 s−1 is determined with a deformation rate {dot over (ε)}H of 10.0 s−1. In comparing the strain hardening index (SHI) at those five strain rates {dot over (ε)}H of 0.10, 0.30, 1.00, 3.00 and 10.00 s−1, the slope of the strain hardening index (SHI) as function of the logarithm on the basis 10 of {dot over (ε)}H, lg({dot over (ε)}H), is a characteristic measure for short-chain-branching. Therefore, a multi-branching index (MBI) is defined as the slope of the strain hardening index (SHI) as a function of lg({dot over (ε)}H), i.e. the slope of a linear fitting curve of the strain hardening index (SHI) versus lg({dot over (ε)}H) applying the least square method, preferably the strain hardening index (SHI) is defined at deformation rates {dot over (ε)}H between 0.05 s−1 and 20.00 s−1, more preferably between 0.10 s−1 and 10.00 s−1, still more preferably at the deformations rates 0.10, 0.30, 1.00, 3.00 and 10.00 s−1. Yet more preferably the SHI-values determined by the deformations rates 0.10, 0.30, 1.00, 3.00 and 10.00 s−1 are used for the linear fit according to the least square method when establishing the multi-branching index (MBI).
Hence, a further requirement is that the polypropylene has a multi-branching index (MBI) of at least 0.10, more preferably of at least 0.15, yet more preferably the multi-branching index (MBI) is in the range of 0.10 to 0.30. In a preferred embodiment the polypropylene has a multi-branching index (MBI) in the range of 0.15 to 0.30.
Accordingly, the polypropylenes of the present technology, i.e. short-chain branched polypropylenes, are characterized by the fact that their strain hardening index (SHI) increases to some extent with the deformation rate {dot over (ε)}H, i.e. a phenomenon which is not observed in linear polypropylenes. Single branched polymer types (so called Y polymers having a backbone with a single long side-chain and an architecture which resembles a “Y”) or H-branched polymer types (two polymer chains coupled with a bridging group and a architecture which resemble an “H”) as well as linear do not show such a relationship, i.e. the strain hardening index (SHI) is not influenced by the deformation rate (see
Additionally the inventive polypropylene has preferably a branching index g′ of less than 1.00. Still more preferably the branching index g′ is more than 0.7. Thus it is preferred that the branching index g′ of the polypropylene is in the range of more than 0.7 to below 1.0, more preferred in the range of more than 0.7 to 0.95, still more preferred in the range of 0.75 to 0.95. The branching index g′ defines the degree of branching and correlates with the amount of branches of a polymer. The branching index g′ is defined as g′=[IV]br/[IV]lin in which g′ is the branching index, [IVbr] is the intrinsic viscosity of the branched polypropylene and [IV]lin is the intrinsic viscosity of the linear polypropylene having the same weight average molecular weight (within a range of ±3%) as the branched polypropylene. Thereby, a low g′-value is an indicator for a high branched polymer. In other words, if the g′-value decreases, the branching of the polypropylene increases. Reference is made in this context to B. H. Zimm and W. H. Stockmeyer, J. Chem. Phys. 17, 1301 (1949). This document is herewith included by reference.
The intrinsic viscosity needed for determining the branching index g′ is measured according to DIN ISO 1628/1, October 1999 (in Decalin at 135° C.).
For further information concerning the measuring methods applied to obtain the relevant data for the branching index g′, the tensile stress growth function ηE+, the Hencky strain rate {dot over (ε)}H, the Hencky strain ε and the multi-branching index (MBI) it is referred to the example section.
The molecular weight distribution (MWD) (also determined herein as ploydispersity) is the relation between the numbers of molecules in a polymer and the individual chain length. The molecular weight distribution (MWD) is expressed as the ratio of weight average molecular weight (Mw) and number average molecular weight (Mn). The number average molecular weight (Mn) is an average molecular weight of a polymer expressed as the first moment of a plot of the number of molecules in each molecular weight range against the molecular weight. In effect, this is the total molecular weight of all molecules divided by the number of molecules. In turn, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is the first moment of a plot of the weight of polymer in each molecular weight range against molecular weight.
The number average molecular weight (Mn) and the weight average molecular weight (Mw) as well as the molecular weight distribution (MWD) are determined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using Waters Alliance GPCV 2000 instrument with online viscometer. The oven temperature is 140° C. Trichlorobenzene is used as a solvent (ISO 16014).
It is preferred that the polypropylene has a weight average molecular weight (Mw) from 10,000 to 2,000,000 g/mol, more preferably from 20,000 to 1,500,000 g/mol.
The number average molecular weight (Mn) of the polypropylene is preferred in the range of 5,000 to 1,000,000 g/mol, more preferably from 10,000 to 750,000 g/mol.
As a broad molecular weight distribution improves the processability of the polypropylene the molecular weight distribution (MWD) is preferably up to 20.00, more preferably up to 10.00, still more preferably up to 8.00. In an alternative embodiment the molecular weight distribution (MWD) is preferably between 1.00 to 8.00, still more preferably in the range of 1.00 to 6.00, yet more preferably in the range of 1.00 to 4.00.
Furthermore, it is preferred that the polypropylene has a melt flow rate (MFR) given in a specific range. The melt flow rate mainly depends on the average molecular weight. This is due to the fact that long molecules render the material a lower flow tendency than short molecules. An increase in molecular weight means a decrease in the MFR-value. The melt flow rate (MFR) is measured in g/10 min of the polymer discharged through a defined die under specified temperature and pressure conditions and the measure of viscosity of the polymer which, in turn, for each type of polymer is mainly influenced by its molecular weight but also by its degree of branching. The melt flow rate measured under a load of 2.16 kg at 230° C. (ISO 1133) is denoted as MFR2. Accordingly, it is preferred that in the present technology the polypropylene has an MFR2 up to 10.00 g/10 min, more preferably up to 6.00 g/10 min. In another preferred embodiment the polypropylene has MFR2 up to 4 g/10 min. A preferred range for the MFR2 is 1.00 to 10.00 g/10 min, more preferably in the range of 1.00 to 6.00 g/10 min.
As cross-linking has a detrimental effect on the extensional flow properties it is preferred that the polypropylene according to the present technology is non-cross-linked.
More preferably, the polypropylene of the instant technology is isotactic. Thus the polypropylene according to the present technology shall have a rather high isotacticity measured by meso pentad concentration (also referred herein as pentad concentration), i.e. higher than 91%, more preferably higher than 93%, still more preferably higher than 94% and most preferably higher than 95%. On the other hand pentad concentration shall be not higher than 99.5%. The pentad concentration is an indicator for the narrowness in the regularity distribution of the polypropylene and measured by NMR-spectroscopy.
In addition, it is preferred that the polypropylene has a melting temperature Tm of higher than 148° C., more preferred higher than 150° C. The measuring method for the melting temperature Tm is discussed in the example section.
Preferably the polymer according to this present technology can be produced with low levels of impurities, i.e. low levels of aluminium (Al) residue and/or low levels of silicon residue (Si) and/or low levels of boron (B) residue. Accordingly the aluminium residues of the polypropylene can be lowered to a level of 12.00 ppm. On the other hand the properties of the present technology are not detrimentally influenced by the presence of residues. Hence in one embodiment the polypropylene according to the present technology is preferably essentially free of any boron and/or silicon residues, i.e. are not detectible (the analysis of residue contents is defined in the example section). In another embodiment the polypropylene according to the present technology comprises preferably boron residues and/or silicon residues in detectable amounts, i.e. in amounts of more than 0.10 ppm of boron residues and/or silicon residues, still more preferably in amounts of more than 0.20 ppm of boron residues and/or silicon residues, yet more preferably in amounts of more than 0.50 ppm of boron residues and/or silicon residues. In still another embodiment the polypropylene according to the present technology comprises aluminium in detectable amounts, i.e. in amounts of more than 5.00 ppm of aluminium residues, still more preferably more than 12.00 ppm of aluminium residues and yet more preferably more than 13.00 ppm of aluminium residues. In yet another embodiment the polypropylene according to the present technology comprises boron and/or silicon in detectable amounts, i.e. in amounts of more than 0.20 ppm of boron residues and/or silicon residues, and aluminium residues in amounts of more than 12.00 ppm, more preferably of more than 25 ppm.
In one embodiment the inventive polypropylene (short-chain branched polypropylene) as defined above (and further defined below) is preferably unimodal. In another preferred embodiment the inventive polypropylene (short-chain branched polypropylene) as defined above (and further defined below) is preferably multimodal, more preferably bimodal.
“Multimodal” or “multimodal distribution” describes a frequency distribution that has several relative maxima (contrary to unimodal having only one maximum). In particular, the expression “modality of a polymer” refers to the form of its molecular weight distribution (MWD) curve, i.e. the appearance of the graph of the polymer weight fraction as a function of its molecular weight. If the polymer is produced in the sequential step process, i.e. by utilizing reactors coupled in series, and using different conditions in each reactor, the different polymer fractions produced in the different reactors each have their own molecular weight distribution which may considerably differ from one another. The molecular weight distribution curve of the resulting final polymer can be seen at a super-imposing of the molecular weight distribution curves of the polymer fraction which will, accordingly, show a more distinct maxima, or at least be distinctively broadened compared with the curves for individual fractions.
A polymer showing such molecular weight distribution curve is called bimodal or multimodal, respectively.
In case the polypropylene is not unimodal it is preferably bimodal.
The polypropylene according to the present technology can be a homopolymer or a copolymer. In case the polypropylene is unimodal the polypropylene is preferably a polypropylene homopolymer as defined below. In turn in case the polypropylene is multimodal, more preferably bimodal, the polypropylene can be a polypropylene homopolymer as well as a polypropylene copolymer. However it is in particular preferred that in case the polypropylene is multimodal, more preferably bimodal, the polypropylene is a polypropylene homopolymer. Further more it is preferred that at least one of the fractions of the multimodal polypropylene is a short-chain branched polypropylene, preferably a short-chain branched polypropylene homopolymer, according to the present technology.
The polypropylene according to the present technology is most preferably a unimodal polypropylene homopolymer.
The expression polypropylene homopolymer as used in the present technology relates to a polypropylene that consists substantially, i.e. of at least 97 wt %, preferably of at least 99 wt %, and most preferably of at least 99.8 wt % of propylene units. In a preferred embodiment only propylene units in the polypropylene homopolymer are detectible. The comonomer content can be determined with FT infrared spectroscopy, as described below in the examples.
In case the polypropylene according to the present technology is a multimodal or bimodal polypropylene copolymer, it is preferred that the comonomer is ethylene. However, also other comonomers known in the art are suitable. Preferably, the total amount of comonomer, more preferably ethylene, in the propylene copolymer is up to 30 wt %, more preferably up to 25 wt %.
In a preferred embodiment, the multimodal or bimodal polypropylene copolymer is a polypropylene copolymer comprising a polypropylene homopolymer matrix being a short chain branched polypropylene according to the present technology and an ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR).
The polypropylene homopolymer matrix can be unimodal or multimodal, i.e. bimodal. However it is preferred that polypropylene homopolymer matrix is unimodal.
Preferably, the ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) in the total multimodal or bimodal polypropylene copolymer is up to 80 wt %. More preferably the amount of ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) in the total multimodal or bimodal polypropylene copolymer is in the range of 20 to 80 wt %, still more preferably in the range of 30 to 60 wt %.
In addition, it is preferred that the multimodal or bimodal polypropylene copolymer being a copolymer comprises a polypropylene homopolymer matrix being a short chain branched polypropylene according to the present technology and an ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) with an ethylene-content of up to 50 wt %.
In addition, it is preferred that the polypropylene as defined above is produced in the presence of the catalyst as defined below. Furthermore, for the production of the polypropylene as defined above, the process as stated below is preferably used.
The polypropylene according to the present technology has been in particular obtained by a new catalyst system. This new catalyst system comprises a symmetric catalyst, whereby the catalyst system has a porosity of less than 1.40 ml/g, more preferably less than 1.30 ml/g and most preferably less than 1.00 ml/g. The porosity has been measured according to DIN 66135 (N2). In another preferred embodiment the porosity is not detectable when determined with the method applied according to DIN 66135 (N2).
A symmetric catalyst according to the present technology is a metallocene compound having a C2-symetry. Preferably the C2-symetric metallocene comprises two identical organic ligands, still more preferably comprises only two organic ligands which are identical, yet more preferably comprises only two organic ligands which are identical and linked via a bridge.
Said symmetric catalyst is preferably a single site catalyst (SSC).
Due to the use of the catalyst system with a very low porosity comprising a symmetric catalyst the manufacture of the above defined short-chain branched polypropylene is possible.
Furthermore it is preferred, that the catalyst system has a surface area of lower than 25 m2/g, yet more preferred lower than 20 m2/g, still more preferred lower than 15 m2/g, yet still lower than 10 m2/g and most preferred lower than 5 m2/g. The surface area according to the present technology is measured according to ISO 9277 (N2).
It is in particular preferred that the catalytic system according to the present technology comprises a symmetric catalyst, i.e. a catalyst as defined above and in further detail below, and has porosity not detectable when applying the method according to DIN 66135 (N2) and has a surface area measured according to ISO 9277 (N2) less than 5 m2/g.
Preferably the symmetric catalyst compound, i.e. the C2-symetric metallocene, has the formula (I):
(Cp)2R1MX2 (I);
wherein
M is Zr, Hf or Ti, more preferably Zr, and
X is independently a monovalent anionic ligand, such as σ-ligand;
R is a bridging group linking the two Cp ligands;
Cp is an organic ligand selected from the group consisting of unsubstituted cyclopenadienyl, unsubstituted indenyl, unsubstituted tetrahydroindenyl, unsubstituted fluorenyl, substituted cyclopenadienyl, substituted indenyl, substituted tetrahydroindenyl, and substituted fluorenyl;
with the proviso that both Cp-ligands are selected from the above stated group and both Cp-ligands are chemically the same, i.e. are identical.
The term “δ-ligand” is understood in the whole description in a known manner, i.e. a group bonded to the metal at one or more places via a sigma bond. A preferred monovalent anionic ligand is halogen, in particular chlorine (Cl).
Preferably, the symmetric catalyst is of formula (I) indicated above,
wherein
M is Zr; and
each X is Cl.
Preferably both identical Cp-ligands are substituted.
The optional one or more substituent(s) bonded to cyclopenadienyl, indenyl, tetrahydroindenyl, or fluorenyl may be selected from a group including halogen, hydrocarbyl (e.g. C1-C20-alkyl, C2-C20-alkenyl, C2-C20-alkynyl, C3-C12-cycloalkyl, C6-C20-aryl or C7-C20-arylalkyl), C3-C12-cycloalkyl which contains 1, 2, 3 or 4 heteroatom(s) in the ring moiety, C6-C20-heteroaryl, C1-C20-haloalkyl, —SiR″3, —OSiR″3, —SR″, —PR″2 and —NR″2, wherein each R″ is independently a hydrogen or hydrocarbyl, e.g. C1-C20-alkyl, C2-C20-alkenyl, C2-C20-alkynyl, C3-C12-cycloalkyl or C6-C20-aryl.
More preferably both identical Cp-ligands are indenyl moieties wherein each indenyl moiety bear one or two substituents as defined above. More preferably each of the identical Cp-ligands is an indenyl moiety bearing two substituents as defined above, with the proviso that the substituents are chosen in such are manner that both Cp-ligands are of the same chemical structure, i.e both Cp-ligands have the same substituents bonded to chemically the same indenyl moiety.
Still more preferably both identical Cp's are indenyl moieties wherein the indenyl moieties comprise at least at the five membered ring of the indenyl moiety, more preferably at 2-position, a substituent selected from the group consisting of alkyl, such as C1-C6 alkyl, e.g. methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, and trialkyloxysiloxy, wherein each alkyl is independently selected from C1-C6 alkyl, such as methyl or ethyl, with proviso that the indenyl moieties of both Cp are of the same chemical structure, i.e both Cp-ligands have the same substituents bonded to chemically the same indenyl moiety.
Still more preferred both identical Cp are indenyl moieties wherein the indenyl moieties comprise at least at the six membered ring of the indenyl moiety, more preferably at 4-position, a substituent selected from the group consisting of a C6-C20 aromatic ring moiety, such as phenyl or naphthyl, preferably phenyl, which is optionally substituted with one or more substitutents, such as C1-C6 alkyl, and a heteroaromatic ring moiety, with proviso that the indenyl moieties of both Cp are of the same chemical structure, i.e both Cp-ligands have the same substituents bonded to chemically the same indenyl moiety.
Yet more preferably both identical Cp are indenyl moieties wherein the indenyl moieties comprise at the five membered ring of the indenyl moiety, more preferably at 2-position, a substituent and at the six membered ring of the indenyl moiety, more preferably at 4-position, a further substituent, wherein the substituent of the five membered ring is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, such as C1-C6 alkyl, e.g. methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, and trialkyloxysiloxy and the further substituent of the six membered ring is selected from the group consisting of a C6-C20 aromatic ring moiety, such as phenyl or naphthyl, preferably phenyl, which is optionally substituted with one or more substituents, such as C1-C6 alkyl, and a heteroaromatic ring moiety, with proviso that the indenyl moieties of both Cp's are of the same chemical structure, i.e both Cp-ligands have the same substituents bonded to chemically the same indenyl moiety.
Concerning the moiety “R” it is preferred that “R” has the formula (II):
—Y(R′)2— (II);
wherein
Y is C, Si or Ge; and
R′ is C1 to C20 alkyl, C6-C12 aryl, or C7-C12 arylalkyl or trimethylsilyl.
In case both Cp-ligands of the symmetric catalyst as defined above, in particular case of two indenyl moieties, are linked with a bridge member R, the bridge member R is typically placed at 1-position. The bridge member R may contain one or more bridge atoms selected from e.g. C, Si and/or Ge, preferably from C and/or Si. One preferable bridge R is —Si(R′)2—, wherein R′ is selected independently from one or more of e.g. trimethylsilyl, C1-C10 alkyl, C1-C20 alkyl, such as C6-C12 aryl, or C7-C40, such as C7-C12 arylalkyl, wherein alkyl as such or as part of arylalkyl is preferably C1-C6 alkyl, such as ethyl or methyl, preferably methyl, and aryl is preferably phenyl. The bridge —Si(R′)2— is preferably e.g. —Si(C1-C6 alkyl)2—, —Si(phenyl)2— or —Si(C1-C6 alkyl)(phenyl)—, such as —Si(Me)2—.
In a preferred embodiment the symmetric catalyst, i.e. the C2-symetric metallocene, is defined by the formula (III)
(Cp)2R1ZrCl2 (III);
wherein
both Cp coordinate to M and are selected from the group consisting of unsubstituted cyclopenadienyl, unsubstituted indenyl, unsubstituted tetrahydroindenyl, unsubstituted fluorenyl, substituted cyclopenadienyl, substituted indenyl, substituted tetrahydroindenyl, and substituted fluorenyl;
with the proviso that both Cp-ligands are chemically the same, i.e. are identical; and
R is a bridging group linking two ligands L;
wherein R is defined by the formula (II):
—Y(R′)2— (II)
wherein
Y is C, Si or Ge; and
R′ is C1 to C20 alkyl, C6-C12 aryl, trimethylsilyl or C7-C12 arylalkyl.
More preferably the symmetric catalyst is defined by the formula (III), wherein both Cp are selected from the group consisting of substituted cyclopenadienyl, substituted indenyl, substituted tetrahydroindenyl, and substituted fluorenyl.
In a preferred embodiment the symmetric catalyst is dimethylsilyl(2-methyl-4-phenyl-indenyl)2zirkonium dichloride (dimethylsilandiylbis(2-methyl-4-phenyl-indenyl)zirkonium dichloride). More preferred said symmetric catalyst is non-silica supported.
The above described symmetric catalyst components are prepared according to the methods described in WO 01/48034.
It is in particular preferred that the symmetric catalyst is obtainable by the emulsion solidification technology as described in WO 03/051934. This document is herewith included in its entirety by reference. Hence the symmetric catalyst is preferably in the form of solid catalyst particles, obtainable by a process comprising the steps of:
Preferably a solvent, more preferably an organic solvent, is used to form said solution. Still more preferably the organic solvent is selected from the group consisting of a linear alkane, cyclic alkane, linear alkene, cyclic alkene, aromatic hydrocarbon and halogen-containing hydrocarbon.
Moreover the immiscible solvent forming the continuous phase is an inert solvent, more preferably the immiscible solvent comprises a fluorinated organic solvent and/or a functionalized derivative thereof, still more preferably the immiscible solvent comprises a semi-, highly- or perfluorinated hydrocarbon and/or a functionalized derivative thereof. It is in particular preferred, that said immiscible solvent comprises a perfluorohydrocarbon or a functionalized derivative thereof, preferably C3-C30 perfluoroalkanes, -alkenes or -cycloalkanes, more preferred C4-C10 perfluoro-alkanes, -alkenes or -cycloalkanes, particularly preferred perfluorohexane, perfluoroheptane, perfluorooctane or perfluoro (methylcyclohexane) or a mixture thereof.
Furthermore it is preferred that the emulsion comprising said continuous phase and said dispersed phase is a bi-or multiphasic system as known in the art. An emulsifier may be used for forming the emulsion. After the formation of the emulsion system, said catalyst is formed in situ from catalyst components in said solution.
In principle, the emulsifying agent may be any suitable agent which contributes to the formation and/or stabilization of the emulsion and which does not have any adverse effect on the catalytic activity of the catalyst. The emulsifying agent may e.g. be a surfactant based on hydrocarbons optionally interrupted with (a) heteroatom(s), preferably halogenated hydrocarbons optionally having a functional group, preferably semi-, highly- or perfluorinated hydrocarbons as known in the art. Alternatively, the emulsifying agent may be prepared during the emulsion preparation, e.g. by reacting a surfactant precursor with a compound of the catalyst solution. Said surfactant precursor may be a halogenated hydrocarbon with at least one functional group, e.g. a highly fluorinated C1 to C30 alcohol, which reacts e.g. with a cocatalyst component, such as aluminoxane.
In principle any solidification method can be used for forming the solid particles from the dispersed droplets. According to one preferable embodiment the solidification is effected by a temperature change treatment. Hence the emulsion subjected to gradual temperature change of up to 10° C./min, preferably 0.5 to 6° C./min and more preferably 1 to 5° C./min. Even more preferred the emulsion is subjected to a temperature change of more than 40° C., preferably more than 50° C. within less than 10 seconds, preferably less than 6 seconds.
The recovered particles have preferably an average size range of 5 to 200 μm, more preferably 10 to 100 μm.
Moreover, the form of solidified particles have preferably a spherical shape, a predetermined particles size distribution and a surface area as mentioned above of preferably less than 25 m2/g, still more preferably less than 20 m2/g, yet more preferably less than 15 m2/g, yet still more preferably less than 10 m2/g and most preferably less than 5 m2/g, wherein said particles are obtained by the process as described above.
For further details, embodiments and examples of the continuous and dispersed phase system, emulsion formation method, emulsifying agent and solidification methods reference is made e.g. to the above cited international patent application WO 03/051934.
The above described symmetric catalyst components are prepared according to the methods described in WO 01/48034.
As mentioned above the catalyst system may further comprise an activator as a cocatalyst, as described in WO 03/051934, which is enclosed herein with reference.
Preferred as cocatalysts for metallocenes and non-metallocenes, if desired, are the aluminoxanes, in particular the C1-C10-alkylaluminoxanes, most particularly methyl aluminoxane (MAO). Such aluminoxanes can be used as the sole cocatalyst or together with other cocatalyst(s). Thus besides or in addition to aluminoxanes, other cation complex forming catalysts activators can be used. Said activators are commercially available or can be prepared according to the prior art literature.
Further aluminoxane cocatalysts are described i.a. in WO 94/28034 which is incorporated herein by reference. These are linear or cyclic oligomers of having up to 40, preferably 3 to 20, —(Al(R′″)O)— repeat units (wherein R′″ is hydrogen, C1-C10-alkyl (preferably methyl) or C6-C18-aryl or mixtures thereof).
The use and amounts of such activators are within the skills of an expert in the field. As an example, with the boron activators, 5:1 to 1:5, preferably 2:1 to 1:2, such as 1:1, ratio of the transition metal to boron activator may be used. In case of preferred aluminoxanes, such as methylaluminumoxane (MAO), the amount of Al, provided by aluminoxane, can be chosen to provide a molar ratio of Al:transition metal e.g. in the range of 1 to 10 000, suitably 5 to 8000, preferably 10 to 7000, e.g. 100 to 4000, such as 1000 to 3000. Typically in case of solid (heterogeneous) catalyst the ratio is preferably below 500.
The quantity of cocatalyst to be employed in the catalyst of the present technology is thus variable, and depends on the conditions and the particular transition metal compound chosen in a manner well known to a person skilled in the art.
Any additional components to be contained in the solution comprising the organotransition compound may be added to said solution before or, alternatively, after the dispersing step.
Furthermore, the present technology is related to the use of the above-defined catalyst system for the production of a polypropylene according to the present technology.
In addition, the present technology is related to the process for producing the inventive polypropylene, whereby the catalyst system as defined above is employed. Furthermore it is preferred that the process temperature is higher than 60° C. Preferably, the process is a multi-stage process to obtain multimodal polypropylene as defined above.
Multistage processes include also bulk/gas phase reactors known as multizone gas phase reactors for producing multimodal propylene polymer.
A preferred multistage process is a “loop-gas phase”-process, such as developed by Borealis A/S, Denmark (known as BORSTAR® technology) described e.g. in patent literature, such as in EP 0 887 379 or in WO 92/12182.
Multimodal polymers can be produced according to several processes which are described, e.g. in WO 92/12182, EP 0 887 379 and WO 97/22633.
A multimodal polypropylene according to the present technology is produced preferably in a multi-stage process in a multi-stage reaction sequence as described in WO 92/12182. The contents of this document are included herein by reference.
It has previously been known to produce multimodal, in particular bimodal, polypropylene in two or more reactors connected in series, i.e. in different steps (a) and (b).
According to the present technology, the main polymerization stages are preferably carried out as a combination of a bulk polymerization/gas phase polymerization.
The bulk polymerizations are preferably performed in a so-called loop reactor.
In order to produce the multimodal polypropylene according to the present technology, a flexible mode is preferred. For this reason, it is preferred that the composition be produced in two main polymerization stages in combination of loop reactor/gas phase reactor.
Optionally, and preferably, the process may also comprise a prepolymerization step in a manner known in the field and which may precede the polymerization step (a).
If desired, a further elastomeric comonomer component, so called ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) component as in the present technology, may be incorporated into the obtained polypropylene homopolymer matrix to form a propylene copolymer as defined above. The ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR) component may preferably be produced after the gas phase polymerization step (b) in a subsequent second or further gas phase polymerizations using one or more gas phase reactors.
The process is preferably a continuous process.
Preferably, in the process for producing the propylene polymer as defined above the conditions for the bulk reactor of step (a) may be as follows:
Subsequently, the reaction mixture from the bulk (bulk) reactor (step a) is transferred to the gas phase reactor, i.e. to step (b), whereby the conditions in step (b) are preferably as follows:
The residence time can vary in both reactor zones. In one embodiment of the process for producing the propylene polymer the residence time in bulk reactor, e.g. loop is in the range 0.5 to 5 hours, e.g. 0.5 to 2 hours and the residence time in gas phase reactor will generally be 1 to 8 hours.
If desired, the polymerization may be effected in a known manner under supercritical conditions in the bulk, preferably loop reactor, and/or as a condensed mode in the gas phase reactor.
The process of the present technology or any embodiments thereof above enable highly feasible means for producing and further tailoring the propylene polymer composition within the present technology, e.g. the properties of the polymer composition can be adjusted or controlled in a known manner e.g. with one or more of the following process parameters: temperature, hydrogen feed, comonomer feed, propylene feed e.g. in the gas phase reactor, catalyst, the type and amount of an external donor (if used), split between components.
The above process enables very feasible means for obtaining the reactor-made polypropylene as defined above.
In the following, the present technology is described by way of examples.
The following definitions of terms and determination methods apply for the above general description of the present technology as well as to the below examples unless otherwise defined.
For the meso pentad concentration analysis, also referred herein as pentad concentration analysis, the assignment analysis is undertaken according to T Hayashi, Pentad concentration, R. Chujo and T. Asakura, Polymer 29 138-43 (1988) and Chujo R, et al., Polymer 35 339 (1994)
Polymer is melted at T=180° C. and stretched with the SER Universal Testing Platform as described below at deformation rates of dε/dt=0.1 0.3 1.0 3.0 and 10 s−1 in subsequent experiments. The method to acquire the raw data is described in Sentmanat et al., J. Rheol. 2005, Measuring the Transient Elongational Rheology of Polyethylene Melts Using the SER Universal Testing Platform.
A Paar Physica MCR300, equipped with a TC30 temperature control unit and an oven CTT600 (convection and radiation heating) and a SERVP01-025 extensional device with temperature sensor and a software RHEOPLUS/32 v2.66 is used.
Stabilized Pellets are compression moulded at 220° C. (gel time 3 min, pressure time 3 min, total moulding time 3+3=6 min) in a mould at a pressure sufficient to avoid bubbles in the specimen, cooled to room temperature. From such prepared plate of 0.7 mm thickness, stripes of a width of 10 mm and a length of 18 mm are cut.
Because of the low forces acting on samples stretched to thin thicknesses, any essential friction of the device would deteriorate the precision of the results and has to be avoided.
In order to make sure that the friction of the device less than a threshold of 5×10-3 mNm (Milli-Newtonmeter) which is required for precise and correct measurements, following check procedure is performed prior to each measurement:
The device is heated for min. 20 min to the test temperature (180° C. measured with the thermocouple attached to the SER device) with clamps but without sample. Subsequently, the sample (0.7×10×18 mm), prepared as described above, is clamped into the hot device. The sample is allowed to melt for 2 minutes+/−20 seconds before the experiment is started.
During the stretching experiment under inert atmosphere (nitrogen) at constant Hencky strain rate, the torque is recorded as function of time at isothermal conditions (measured and controlled with the thermocouple attached to the SER device).
After stretching, the device is opened and the stretched film (which is winded on the drums) is inspected. Homogenous extension is required. It can be judged visually from the shape of the stretched film on the drums if the sample stretching has been homogenous or not. The tape must me wound up symmetrically on both drums, but also symmetrically in the upper and lower half of the specimen.
If symmetrical stretching is confirmed hereby, the transient elongational viscosity calculates from the recorded torque as outlined below.
For each of the different strain rates dε/dt applied, the resulting tensile stress growth function ηE+ (dε/dt, t) is plotted against the total Hencky strain c to determine the strain hardening behaviour of the melt, see
In the range of Hencky strains between 1.0 and 3.0, the tensile stress growth function ηE+ can be well fitted with a function
ηE+({dot over (ε)},ε)=c1·εc
where c1 and c2 are fitting variables. Such derived c2 is a measure for the strain hardening behavior of the melt and called Strain Hardening Index SHI.
Dependent on the polymer architecture, SHI can:
be independent of the strain rate (linear materials, Y- or H-structures);
increase with strain rate (short chain-, hyper- or multi-branched structures).
This is illustrated in
For polyethylene, linear (HDPE), short-chain branched (LLDPE) and hyperbranched structures (LDPE) are well known and hence they are used to illustrate the structural analytics based on the results on extensional viscosity. They are compared with a polypropylene with Y and H-structures with regard to their change of the strain-hardening behavior as function of strain rate, see
To illustrate the determination of SHI at different strain rates as well as the multi-branching index (MBI) four polymers of known chain architecture are examined with the analytical procedure described above.
The first polymer is a H- and Y-shaped polypropylene homopolymer made according to EP 879 830 (“A”). It has a MFR230/2.16 of 2.0 g/10 min, a tensile modulus of 1950 MPa and a branching index g′ of 0.7.
The second polymer is a commercial hyperbranched LDPE, Borealis “B”, made in a high pressure process known in the art. It has a MFR190/2.16 of 4.5 and a density of 923 kg/m3.
The third polymer is a short chain branched LLDPE, Borealis “C”, made in a low pressure process known in the art. It has a MFR190/2.16 of 1.2 and a density of 919 kg/m3.
The fourth polymer is a linear HDPE, Borealis “D”, made in a low pressure process known in the art. It has a MFR190/2.16 of 4.0 and a density of 954 kg/m3.
The four materials of known chain architecture are investigated by means of measurement of the transient elongational viscosity at 180° C. at strain rates of 0.10, 0.30, 1.0, 3.0 and 10 s−1. Obtained data (transient elongational viscosity versus Hencky strain) is fitted with a function
ηE+=C1εC
for each of the mentioned strain rates. The parameters c1 and c2 are found through plotting the logarithm of the transient elongational viscosity against the logarithm of the Hencky strain and performing a linear fit of this data applying the least square method. The parameter c1 calculates from the intercept of the linear fit of the data lg(ηE+) versus lg(ε) from:
c1=10Intercept
and c2 is the strain hardening index (SHI) at the particular strain rate.
This procedure is done for all five strain rates and hence, SHI@0.1 s−1, SHI@0.3 s−1, SHI@1.0 s−1, SHI@3.0 s−1, SHI@10 s−1 are determined, see
From the strain hardening behaviour measured by the values of the SHI@1 s−1 one can already clearly distinguish between two groups of polymers: Linear and short-chain branched have a SHI@1 s−1 significantly smaller than 0.30. In contrast, the Y and H-branched as well as hyperbranched materials have a SHI@1 s−1 significantly larger than 0.30.
In comparing the strain hardening index at those five strain rates {dot over (ε)}H of 0.10, 0.30, 1.0, 3.0 and 10 s−1, the slope of SHI as function of the logarithm of {dot over (ε)}H, lg({dot over (ε)}H) is a characteristic measure for multi-branching. Therefore, a multi-branching index (MBI) is calculated from the slope of a linear fitting curve of SHI versus lg({dot over (ε)}H):
SHI({dot over (ε)}H)=c3+MBI*lg({dot over (ε)}H)
The parameters c3 and MBI are found through plotting the SHI against the logarithm of the Hencky strain rate lg({dot over (ε)}H) and performing a linear fit of this data applying the least square method. Please confer to
The multi-branching index MBI allows now to distinguish between Y or H-branched polymers which show a MBI smaller than 0.05 and hyperbranched polymers which show a MBI larger than 0.15. Further, it allows to distinguish between short-chain branched polymers with MBI larger than 0.10 and linear materials which have a MBI smaller than 0.10.
Similar results can be observed when comparing different polypropylenes, i.e. polypropylenes with rather high branched structures have higher SHI and MBI-values, respectively, compared to their linear and short-chain counterparts. Similar to the linear low density polyethylenes the new developed polypropylenes show a certain degree of short-chain branching. However the polypropylenes according to the instant technology are clearly distinguished in the SHI and MBI-values when compared to known linear low density polyethylenes. Without being bound on this theory, it is believed, that the different SHI and MBI-values are the result of a different branching architecture. For this reason the new found branched polypropylenes according to the present technology are designated as short-chain branched.
Combining both, strain hardening index and multi-branching index, the chain architecture can be assessed as indicated in Table 3:
The below described elementary analysis is used for determining the content of elementary residues which are mainly originating from the catalyst, especially the Al-, B-, and Si-residues in the polymer. Said Al-, B- and Si-residues can be in any form, e.g. in elementary or ionic form, which can be recovered and detected from polypropylene using the below described ICP-method. The method can also be used for determining the Ti-content of the polymer. It is understood that also other known methods can be used which would result in similar results.
ICP-instrument: The instrument for determination of Al-, B- and Si-content is ICP Optima 2000 DV, PSN 620785 (supplier Perkin Elmer Instruments, Belgium) with software of the instrument.
Detection limits are 0.10 ppm (Al), 0.10 ppm (B), 0.10 ppm (Si).
The polymer sample was first ashed in a known manner, then dissolved in an appropriate acidic solvent. The dilutions of the standards for the calibration curve are dissolved in the same solvent as the sample and the concentrations chosen so that the concentration of the sample would fall within the standard calibration curve.
ppm: means parts per million by weight
Ash content: Ash content is measured according to ISO 3451-1 (1997) standard.
The ash and the above listed elements, Al and/or Si and/or B can also be calculated form a polypropylene based on the polymerization activity of the catalyst as exemplified in the examples. These values would give the upper limit of the presence of said residues originating form the catalyst.
Thus the estimate catalyst residue is based on catalyst composition and polymerization productivity, catalyst residues in the polymer can be estimated according to:
Total catalyst residues [ppm]=1/productivity [kgpp/gcatalyst]×100;
Al residues [ppm]=wAl, catalyst [%]×total catalyst residues [ppm]/100;
Zr residues [ppm]=wZr, catalyst [%]×total catalyst residues [ppm]/100;
(Similar calculations apply also for B, Cl and Si residues).
Chlorine residues content: The content of Cl-residues is measured from samples in the known manner using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry. The instrument was X-ray fluorescention Philips PW2400, PSN 620487, (Supplier: Philips, Belgium) software X47. Detection limit for Cl is 1 ppm.
Particle size distribution: Particle size distribution is measured via Coulter Counter LS 200 at room temperature with n-heptane as medium.
NMR
The 13C-NMR spectra of polypropylenes were recorded on Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer at 130° C. from samples dissolved in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene/benzene-d6 (90/10 w/w). For the pentad analysis the assignment is done according to the methods described in literature: (T. Hayashi, Y. Inoue, R. Chüjö, and T. Asakura, Polymer 29 138-43 (1988). and Chujo R, et al, Polymer 35 339 (1994).
The NMR-measurement was used for determining the mmmm pentad concentration in a manner well known in the art.
Number average molecular weight (Mn), weight average molecular weight (Mw) and molecular weight distribution (MWD) are determined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using Waters Alliance GPCV 2000 instrument with online viscometer. The oven temperature is 140° C. Trichlorobenzene is used as a solvent (ISO 16014).
The xylene solubles (XS, wt.-%): Analysis according to the known method: 2.0 g of polymer is dissolved in 250 ml p-xylene at 135° C. under agitation. After 30±2 minutes the solution is allowed to cool for 15 minutes at ambient temperature and then allowed to settle for 30 minutes at 25±0.5° C. The solution is filtered and evaporated in nitrogen flow and the residue dried under vacuum at 90° C. until constant weight is reached.
XS %=(100×m1×v0)/(m0×v1); wherein
m0=initial polymer amount (g);
m1=weight of residue (g);
v0=initial volume (ml);
V1=volume of analyzed sample (ml).
Melting temperature Tm, crystallization temperature Tc, and the degree of crystallinity: measured with Mettler TA820 differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on 5-10 mg samples. Both crystallization and melting curves were obtained during 10° C./min cooling and heating scans between 30° C. and 225° C. Melting and crystallization temperatures were taken as the peaks of endotherms and exotherms.
Also the melt- and crystallization enthalpy (Hm and Hc) were measured by the DSC method according to ISO 11357-3.
Stepwise Isothermal Segregation Technique (SIST): The isothermal crystallisation for SIST analysis was performed in a Mettler TA820 DSC on 3±0.5 mg samples at decreasing temperatures between 200° C. and 105° C.
(i) The samples were melted at 225° C. for 5 min.,
(ii) then cooled with 80° C./min to 145° C.
(iii) held for 2 hours at 145° C.,
(iv) then cooled with 80° C./min to 135° C.
(v) held for 2 hours at 135° C.,
(vi) then cooled with 80° C./min to 125° C.
(vii) held for 2 hours at 125° C.,
(viii) then cooled with 80° C./min to 115° C.
(ix) held for 2 hours at 115° C.,
(x) then cooled with 80° C./min to 105° C.
(xi) held for 2 hours at 105° C.
After the last step the sample was cooled down to ambient temperature, and the melting curve was obtained by heating the cooled sample at a heating rate of 10° C./min up to 200° C. All measurements were performed in a nitrogen atmosphere. The melt enthalpy is recorded as function of temperature and evaluated through measuring the melt enthalpy of fractions melting within temperature intervals as indicated in the table 7.
The melting curve of the material crystallised this way can be used for calculating the lamella thickness distribution according to Thomson-Gibbs equation (Eq 1.).
where T0=457K, ΔH0=184×106 J/m3, σ=0,049.6 J/m2 and L is the lamella thickness.
MFR2: measured according to ISO 1133 (230° C., 2.16 kg load).
Comonomer content is measured with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) calibrated with 13C-NMR. When measuring the ethylene content in polypropylene, a thin film of the sample (thickness about 250 mm) was prepared by hot-pressing. The area of —CH2— absorption peak (800-650 cm−1) was measured with Perkin Elmer FTIR 1600 spectrometer. The method was calibrated by ethylene content data measured by 13C-NMR.
Stiffness Film TD (transversal direction), Stiffness Film MD (machine direction), Elongation at break TD and Elongation at break MD: these are determined according to ISO527-3 (cross head speed: 1 mm/min).
Haze and transparency: are determined according to ASTM D1003-92 (haze).
Intrinsic viscosity: is measured according to DIN ISO 1628/1, October 1999 (in Decalin at 135° C.).
Porosity: is measured according to DIN 66135
Surface area: is measured according to ISO 9277
The catalyst was prepared as described in example 5 of WO 03/051934, with the Al- and Zr-ratios as given in said example (Al/Zr=250).
Catalyst Characteristics:
Al- and Zr-content were analyzed via above mentioned method to 36.27 wt.-% Al and 0.42%-wt. Zr. The average particle diameter (analyzed via Coulter counter) is 20 μm and particle size distribution is shown in
Polymerization
A 5 liter stainless steel reactor was used for propylene polymerizations. 1100 g of liquid propylene (Borealis polymerization grade) was fed to reactor. 0.2 ml triethylaluminum (100%, purchased from Crompton) was fed as a scavenger and 15 mmol hydrogen (quality 6.0, supplied by Å ga) as chain transfer agent. Reactor temperature was set to 30° C. 29.1 mg catalyst were flushed into to the reactor with nitrogen overpressure. The reactor was heated up to 70° C. in a period of about 14 minutes. Polymerization was continued for 50 minutes at 70° C., then propylene was flushed out, 5 mmol hydrogen were fed and the reactor pressure was increased to 20 bars by feeding (gaseous-) propylene. Polymerization continued in gas-phase for 144 minutes, then the reactor was flashed, the polymer was dried and weighted.
Polymer yield was weighted to 901 g, that equals a productivity of 31 kgpp/gcatalyst. 1000 ppm of a commercial stabilizer Irganox B 215 (FF) (Ciba) have been added to the powder. The powder has been melt compounded with a Prism TSE16 lab kneader at 250 rpm at a temperature of 220-230° C.
A catalyst as used in I1 has been used.
A 5 liter stainless steel reactor was used for propylene polymerizations. 1100 g of liquid propylene (Borealis polymerization grade) was fed to reactor. 0.5 ml triethylaluminum (100%, purchased from Crompton) was fed as a scavenger and 50 mmol hydrogen (quality 6.0, supplied by Ø ga) as chain transfer agent. Reactor temperature was set to 30° C. 19.9 mg catalyst were flushed into to the reactor with nitrogen overpressure. The reactor was heated up to 70° C. in a period of about 14 minutes. Polymerization was continued for 40 minutes at 70° C., then propylene was flushed out, the reactor pressure was increased to 20 bars by feeding (gaseous-) propylene. Polymerization continued in gas-phase for 273 minutes, then the reactor was flashed, the polymer was dried and weighted.
Polymer yield was weighted to 871 g, that equals a productivity of 44 kgpp/gcatalyst. 1000 ppm of a commercial stabilizer Irganox B 215 (FF) (Ciba) have been added to the powder. The powder has been melt compounded with a Prism TSE16 lab kneader at 250 rpm at a temperature of 220-230° C.
50 wt % I3a have been mixed with 50 wt % I3b before compounding and pelletizing to obtain a bimodal polypropylene from melt blending with a Prism TSE16 lab kneader at 250 rpm at a temperature of 220-230° C.
The same catalyst as in example I1 has been used.
A 20 liter stainless steel reactor was used for propylene polymerization. 1000 g of liquid propylene (Borealis polymerization grade) was fed to reactor. 0.4 ml triethylaluminum (100% (purchased from Crompton), added as 1 molar solution in hexane)) was fed as a scavenger and 60 mmol hydrogen (quality 6.0, supplied by Aga) as chain transfer agent using propylene as spilling agent (250 resp. 500 g). Reactor temperature was set to 13° C. 73.4 mg catalyst was flushed into to the reactor with 250 g liquid propylene. The catalyst was prepolymerized for 10 min. Then the reactor was heated up to 70° C. in a period of about 15 minutes adding additional 2470 g propylene. Polymerization was continued for 30 minutes at 70° C. After that propylene was flashed and the polymer dried and weighed.
Polymer yield was 1185 g, equalling a productivity of 16.14 kg PP/gcatalyst. 1000 ppm of a commercial stabilizer Irganox B 215 (FF) (Ciba) have been added to the powder.
The same catalyst as in example I1 has been used.
A 20 liter stainless steel reactor was used for propylene polymerization. 1000 g of liquid propylene (Borealis polymerization grade) was fed to reactor. 0.4 ml triethylaluminum (100% (purchased from Crompton), added as 1 molar solution in hexane)) was fed as a scavenger and 60 mmol hydrogen (quality 6.0, supplied by Aga) as chain transfer agent using propylene as spilling agent (250 resp. 500 g). Reactor temperature was set to 14° C. 70.9 mg catalyst, contacted with 1.8 ml white mineral oil (PRIMOL 352 D/Esso) for 15 min, was flushed into to the reactor with 250 g liquid propylene. The catalyst was prepolymerized for 10 min. Then the reactor was heated up to 70° C. in a period of about 17 minutes adding additional 2470 g propylene and 413 mmol H2. Polymerization was continued for 30 minutes at 70° C. After that propylene was flashed and the polymer dried and weighed.
Polymer yield was 1334 g, equalling a productivity of 18.82 kg PP/gcatalyst. 1000 ppm of a commercial stabilizer Irganox B 215 (FF) (Ciba) have been added to the powder.
A silica supported metallocene catalyst (I) was prepared according to WO 01/48034 (example 27). The porosity of the support is 1.6 ml/g. An asymmetric metallocene dimethylsilyl [(2-methyl-(4′-tert.butyl)-4-phenyl-indenyl)(2-isopropyl-(4′-tert.butyl)-4-phenyl-indenyl)]zirkonium dichloride has been used.
A 20 liter stainless steel reactor was used for propylene homopolymerization. 4470 g of liquid propylene (Borealis polymerization grade) was fed to reactor. 0.4 ml triethylaluminum (100% (purchased from Crompton), added as 1 molar solution in hexane) was fed as a scavenger and 4 mmol hydrogen (quality 6.0, supplied by Aga) as chain transfer agent using propylene as spilling agent (250 g). Reactor temperature was set to 30° C. and the reactor pressurized with N2 to 25 bar. 214 mg catalyst was flushed into to the reactor via N2 (increasing pressure about 0.9 bar in the reactor). After that the reactor temperature control was set up to 70° C. Polymerization was continued for 30 minutes at 70° C. Then monomers were flashed and the polymer was dried and weighed.
Polymer yield was 656 g, equalling a productivity of 3 kg PP/gcatalyst. 000 ppm of a commercial stabilizer Irganox B 215 (FF) (Ciba) have been added to the powder. The powder has been melt compounded with a Prism TSE16 lab kneader at 250 rpm at a temperature of 220-230° C.
A commercial polypropylene homopolymer of Borealis has been used.
A commercial Polypropylene homopolymer of Borealis has been used.
In Tables 4, 5 and 6, the properties of samples C1-C3 and I1-I3 are summarized. Furthermore, Table 4 provides an evaluation of processing properties, stiffness and heat resistance.
In Table 7, the crystallization behaviour of samples C3, I1 and I2 is determined via stepwise isothermal segregation technique (SIST).
A biaxially oriented film is prepared as follows:
In the biaxial stretching Device Bruckner Karo IV, film samples are clamped and extended in both, longitudinal and transverse direction, at constant stretching speed. The length of the sample increases during stretching in longitudinal direction and the stretch ratio in longitudinal direction calculates from the ratio of current length over original sample length. Subsequently, the sample is stretched in transverse direction where the width of the sample is increasing. Hence, the stretch ratio calculates from the current width of the sample over the original width of the sample.
In Table 8, the stretching properties of samples I1-I3 and C1-C3 are summarized.
In Table 9, the properties of the biaxially oriented polypropylene films prepared from samples I1-I3 and C1-C3 are summarized.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06014271.8 | Jul 2006 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/342,173 filed Dec. 23, 2008 which is a continuation of International Application Serial No. PCT/EP2007/006057 (International Publication Number WO 2008/006530 A1), having an International filing date of Jul. 9, 2007 entitled “Short-Chain-Branched Polypropylene”. International Application No. PCT/EP2007/006057 claimed priority benefits, in turn, from European Patent Application No. 06014271.8 filed Jul. 10, 2006. International Application No. PCT/EP2007/006057 and European Patent Application No. 06014271.8 are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12342173 | Dec 2008 | US |
| Child | 12914695 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/EP2007/006057 | Jul 2007 | US |
| Child | 12342173 | US |
