This invention relates to shot blast equipment and more particularly to shot blast wheels with removable blades radially disposed thereon.
Shot blasting is a common technique to change surface characteristics of a variety of different parts. A shot blasting wheel can propel shot or small spheres of hard material to impact and smooth a rough surface, roughen a smooth surface, shape a surface, or remove surface contaminants. Shot blasting can be achieved by a wheel and blade assembly accelerating shot to a relatively high velocity towards the material surface of an object or group of objects to be treated. It is typical to configure equipment such that shot material is introduced into the center of a rotating wheel having a plurality of radially disposed blades mounted thereon. The shot is accelerated by the blades attached to the spinning wheel, and can be directed toward an opening in a control cage where the shot may exit to contact the objects being treated. Wheel blasting is often referred to as airless blasting, as no fluid propellant is used.
Because of the abrasive quality of the shot and the high speed at which the wheels and blades are turned, blades wear out and require frequent replacement. Removable blades have been developed to allow a user to replace blades individually. A variety of designs of blade and wheel combinations have been utilized in an attempt to efficiently direct shot within a shot blasting machine.
The present disclosure provides improvements to shot blasting blades, including improvements that make the blades more easily removed and installed without compromising safety or strength, and others that can reduce wear on the blades and wheel. The blades disclosed herein can reduce wear on critical wheel and blade surfaces, such as the wheel surfaces proximate to blade receiving slots, and blade surfaces proximate to the same receiving slots when installed. Furthermore, the blades disclosed can be utilized with wheels having different blade receiving slot configurations.
In one embodiment, a removably attachable blade comprises two side surfaces, a top connected and extending along the two side surfaces, and a blade attachment portion which, when installed, extends along a wheel radius. The blade attachment portion can comprise a rail extending perpendicular to the side surfaces and a plurality of runners, wherein the runners are configured to contact an inner surface of a blade receiving slot defined in the centrifugal blasting wheel and the bottom edge is configured to contact an outer wheel surface when the blade is in the attached position.
In another embodiment, a shot blasting wheel assembly adapted for directing shot through centrifugal action is disclosed. The assembly comprises an annular wheel and a plurality of blades removably attachable to the wheel. The wheel can comprise substantially planar blade mounting surfaces that extends radially from an inner perimeter to an outer perimeter and a plurality of radially extending blade receiving slots defined in the blade mounting surface, wherein the blade receiving slots have an interior width larger than the width measure at the blade mounting surface. Each blade can comprise a large area blade and an integrated attachment portion having opposing runners with bottom edge surfaces. The runners contact an inner surface of the blade receiver and the bottom edge surfaces contact an outer wheel surface when the blade is in an attached position.
In yet another embodiment, blades for a rotatable shot blasting wheel of the type having upwardly sloped, radial blade retaining slots with open tops defined by opposed radial flanges are disclosed. The blade comprises a blade body having opposite sides, a top flange, and an integral blade attachment portion. The blade attachment portion extends along the bottom of the body and comprises an upper, radially extending rail set extending substantially the full radial length of the blade body, a first set of opposed runners projecting laterally from the blade retaining portion at or near the radially-innermost end of the blade, and a second set of opposed runners projecting laterally from the blade retaining portion forwardly of the first set of runners. The runners are offset relative to the height of the blade to achieve a cam fit with a blade receiving slot of radially decreasing cross sectional dimension, such that a portion of the blade proximate to the blade receiving slot is held between the rail set and the first and second set of runners through a trapping or wedging action.
Variations in these and other aspects of the disclosure will be described in additional detail hereafter.
The various features, advantages and other uses of the present invention will become more apparent by referring to the following detailed description and drawings in which:
Referring first to
Slot width 40, slot depth 42, slot surface width 38, and flange height 44 can be defined as labeled in
Turning now to
Blade 50 further comprises top flange 58 that extends along the top of blade 50 from inner blade surface 54 to outer blade surface 56, and top flange 58 is wider than the distance between sides 52. Top flange 58 is longitudinally ridged. Alternatively, top flange 58 can be flat. Top flange 58 can be designed to be a certain shape based upon clearance between the blade 50 and shot blast cage, when the blade 50 is installed. Top edges 60 can overhang and extend past sides 52 in a lateral direction, perpendicular to sides 52 proximate to top edge 60.
Located opposite top flange 58 and formed integrally with blade 50 is blade attachment portion 62. Blade attachment portion 62 allows the blade 50 to be removably attached to wheel 12 by sliding portion 62 into blade retaining slot 30. Blade attachment portion 62 comprises opposed, outwardly projecting longitudinal rails 68. Blade 50 further comprises longitudinally spaced-apart sets 64 and 66 of opposed runners. Runners 64 and 66 are spaced below the rails 68, such that a channel 70 is defined between the runners and rails. Runners 64 and 66 do not extend the entire length of the attachment portion 62; rather they are disposed near the inner and outer ends of an extension of the attachment portion 62 as shown. Rib 65 spans between the inner runners 64 and outer runners 66. Blade attachment portion 62 can be symmetrical such that inner and outer runners 64 and 66 of each side of the blade are similarly shaped, sized, and positioned as the opposing side runners.
With reference to
In the fully attached position, blade 50 is retained by wheel 12 through the contact of the bottom rail surfaces 72 with blade mounting surface 14, and the contact of runner surfaces 74 with upper retaining surface 36. The bottom surface 72 of rail 68 contacts blade mounting surface 14 at top contact point 82 at a given cross section, as shown in
In the fully attached position, blade 50 is held in place vertically by the contact of bottom rail surface 72 of rail 68 and retaining surface 14 and the contact between runner surface 74 and upper retaining surface 36. Retaining slot flanges 35 of wheel 12 are “sandwiched” in channel 70 between the rails and runners. Furthermore, the blade can be retained from further movement in a radially outward direction through contact of an end of blade attachment 62 and outer surface 29 of wheel 12, or through frictional forces from the contacting surfaces of blade 50 and wheel 12. Additional ways in further securing or locking blade 50 to wheel 12 can also be accomplished.
As evident from the above description and
Since blades 50 and wheel 12 contact shot material at high speeds, it is to be appreciated that both blades 50 and wheel 12 are comprised of a wear-resistant material. As an example, blade 50 can be created through an investment casting process from a 15/3 chrome iron with tolerances of approximately of 5/1000s of an inch. Other suitable materials are contemplated for forming the blades, as well as through different processes such as machining and other types of casting. Blade 50 can also be heat treated to reach a Rockwell scale of C 58 to further harden the steel, providing further wear resistance when in use.
The design of both the blades 50 and wheel 12 help alleviate some of the problems due to the wear from the contact with the abrasive shot material. By having a simple slide-in blade, blades can be replaced as they show signs of significant wear, at different times than replacing the wheel. For example, under a particular pattern of use the blades may wear out every week, while the wheel stays functional for longer periods of time. Another advantage of the embodiments disclosed herein is that the blade 50 can protect portions of wheel 12 proximate to the blade receiving slots 30 from abrasion and wear. By incorporating rail 68 to allow the blade 50 to contact both the upper receiving surface 36 and the blade retaining surface 14, blade receiving slots 30 are provided additional protection from wear. Rail 68 can extend past the edge of blade retaining surface 14 as shown in the Figures. Where other designs allow shot to wear down the blade retaining surface 14 area near blade receiving slots 30, rail 68 protects the inside of blade receiving slots 30 and the retaining surface 14 in close proximity to the openings of blade receiving slots 30. This can increase wheel life, and prevent abrasive wear near the blade receiving slots such that wheel 12 can safely and effectively retain blades 50 for a longer period of time. The added overlap of rail 68 can also aid in the removal and attachment processes, as it can prevent shot material from collecting and blocking portions of receiving slots 30 as well as prevent blade 50 to seize to the wheel at points within the receiving slots 30.
The above-described embodiments have been described in order to allow easy understanding of the present invention and do not limit the present invention. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structure as is permitted under the law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2295926 | Boesger | Sep 1942 | A |
3444651 | Geisseler | May 1969 | A |
3872624 | Ramaswamy | Mar 1975 | A |
4395851 | Watts | Aug 1983 | A |
4447993 | Laido | May 1984 | A |
4751798 | McDade | Jun 1988 | A |
5205085 | Urakami | Apr 1993 | A |
5476412 | Stoltz | Dec 1995 | A |
5584748 | Flynn | Dec 1996 | A |
5759091 | MacMillan | Jun 1998 | A |
6447378 | Hoff | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6981910 | Goff | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7585207 | Barriger | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8043141 | Goff | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8550881 | Loutzenheiser | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8920217 | Panzenhagen | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20080076333 | Krause | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090149117 | Barriger | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150190900 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |