Shotshell or shotgun cartridges typically comprise a propellant charge, a wad and a shot load, all of which are contained within a plastic or paper shell reinforced at one end with a metal case head to contain and direct the created propellant gases through the opposite end of the cartridge. The shotgun wad typically comprises an injection molded polymer body that obturates against the barrel during firing to prevent escape of propellant gases around the slug or through the shot. The wad often comprises a forward facing cup portion with wings that contains the shot or slug as the shot travels through the barrel. Upon exiting the barrel, aerodynamic drag on the cup portion or the flaring of the fins slows the wad separating the wad from the slug or shot and freeing the projectile(s) to travel onto the target alone.
A primary consideration is determining the performance of a shot loaded shotshell cartridge is determining the maximum effective range at which there is sufficient shot density to accurately strike a target. A standard measurement for determining the effective range of the shotgun cartridge is patterning or measuring the percentage of shot that strikes within a 30 inch circle at 40 yards or other predetermined distance. The tightness of the pattern or the percentage of shot that strikes within the circle can be affected by the size and shape of the shot, the size of the propellant load and the separation point between the wad and the shot. For the purposes of this disclosure, the separation point is the point during flight in which wad dispenses the shot load from the cup portion. To the extent that the separation point can be delayed, the effective range can be extended. However, in conventional wads, the longer the wad remains with the shot during flight, the greater the likelihood that the wad flight will be unstable and will yaw or otherwise have a non-straight flight and will worsen the patterning of the shot load or produce an irregular shot pattern.
Thus the forward wings on the shot cup that deploy almost immediately after leaving the muzzle causing significant aerodynamic drag upon leaving the muzzle with n intended separation point as close to the end of the muzzle as possible.
In certain wads, the wad is commonly formed by four separate wings together defining the walls of the forward cup. The wings flare open immediately upon leaving the muzzle to slow the wad and release the load as soon as possible. Similarly, certain shotgun chokes, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,523,581, slow the wad as the wad passes the choke to begin to separate the shot from the load even before the wad exits the muzzle. In both configurations, the wad is rapidly slowed to facilitate a separation point as close to the muzzle of the barrel as possible.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,260,484 provided a meaningful advancement in maintaining flight stability of the wad with shot permitting wad separation further down the flight path. This is commercially sold as the FLIGHTCONTROL® wad. Referring to
It has been recognized that different shotgun shells which utilize the rear cup portion fins and the side opening window as disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,260,484 patent often exhibit inconsistent patterns when the cartridges are fired in shotguns with ported chokes. See
See also US 2013/0228090, owned by the owner of the instant application and incorporated herein by reference addressing the advantages of separating the center of pressure and the center of gravity for wad flight stability and certain advantages of using different polymers for the forward shot cup and rearward propellant cup.
The inventors of the instant application have determined that the conventional wall segments in the forward shot cup, in combination with the flared propellant cups, contribute to inconsistent patterns in that they move the center of pressure forwardly and make for an instable projectile. This then may cause the wad with shot therein to yaw or tumble, dramatically effecting the shot pattern. Moreover, such wall segments can be hung up on ported chokes damaging the wad and affecting the performance of the wad and consequently the shot pattern.
In embodiments of the invention, a shotgun shell has a polymer wad with a forward shot cup portion and a rearward propellant cup, the wad in a casing, shot in the shot cup, propellant in the propellant cup, and a primer. The rearward propellant cup portion having enhanced fin deployment such that the shells are operative with shotguns with no chokes, shotguns with ported chokes, and shotguns with conventional chokes. Additionally, in embodiments of the disclosure, the forward shot cup portion has axial slits that are sized to preclude shot from passing therethrough while providing sufficient air circulation to provide compaction relief of the shot pack. In embodiments, further means are provided for retaining the fins uniformly angled rearwardly in an open position as the wad travels down range. Said means for retaining the fins uniformly angled in an open position also does not inhibit the fin opening action when the respective cartridge is used in a wide range of barrel pressures provided by choked and non-choked shotguns, thereby providing the desirable consistent fin flaring independent of the gun in which the cartridge is fired.
In embodiments of the invention, a shotshell cartridge wad has a forward shot cup and a rearward propellant cup, each respectively partially defined by a wad partition portion. The rearward cup having a plurality of deployable fins extending from the partition portion, the deployable fins having a reduced resistance to opening, compared to conventional wads, by suitably configuring a hinge region connecting the fins to the wad partition portion. Additionally, a means for retaining the fins in an open position is provided. In embodiments the means is a rearward projecting portion or portions within the interior of the rearward cup and includes a plurality of gussets extending at a plurality of the deployable fines at an interior corner defined by the wad partition portion and the plurality of fins. In embodiments, rearward projecting portion or portions is configured as a star shaped projecting array centrally positioned on the partition portion with projecting rays extending towards the respective plurality of fins. In embodiments the gusset array has a central portion from which each gusset is connected. Each gusset configured as a web which utilizes the mechanical advantage of the length of each fin with the web near the hinge point to strain the web past the polymer yield point thereby stretching and lengthening the web between the partition portion and the fin, such that respective fin is inhibited from returning to the undeployed position. Utilization of the mechanical advantage to stretch the web allows effective deployment of the fins and outward retention of the fins under a wider a wider operating range of barrel pressures than prior art wads.
A feature and advantage of embodiments is that the central portion may be positioned at an injection molding gate providing for an efficient mold design facilitating the injection molding process of the wad. The gate being centrally positioned with the gussets providing a molten polymer flow path enhancing the size of the flow path, compared to conventional wads, to the forward cup portion and the rearward fins.
In embodiment of the invention, the rearward fins of a shotshell cartridge each having a central internal gusset at a bend zone such that upon exiting the muzzle of a shotgun with a ported choke the fins bend sufficiently to cause the polymer of the gusset to yield, thereby stretching the gusset. This inhibits the gusset from returning to the unflared position, and facilitates maintaining the fins in a flared position. Thus a feature and advantage of embodiments is that a shotshell cartridge with a wad with a shot cup and a propellant cup portion with fins on the propellant cup portion defined by longitudinal slits extending from the rearward edge toward the partition portion. The fins each having a bend zone allowing the fins to open upon leaving a muzzle of a shotgun from which the cartridge is fired, the wad further having a means for retaining the fins in an open positions. In embodiments, said means is a gusset extending between a plurality of the fins and the partition portion, the gusset having a yield point under stress condition, wherein when the yield point is exceeded the gusset permanently extends. Wherein when the cartridge containing the wad is fired in a choked shotgun, the fins deploy sufficiently to pass the yield point to thereby inhibit the return of the respective fins to their original undeployed position.
In embodiments of the invention, a separate component moves axially upon firing to provide a bias to fins to urge or force the fins outwardly upon leaving the muzzle. In embodiments, the separate component is configured as a disk in the propellant cup portion that moves upon ignition of the propellant forwardly in the cup portion to engage cam surfaces of the fins proximate or at their bend zones urging the fins outward. As the wad travels down the barrel, the disk and fins at the cam surfaces are compressed radially outward but the fins are precluded from flaring outward due to the constraints of the barrel. Upon exit from the muzzle, the fins are forced outward by the disk and by the expanding propellant gases. As the fins flare outwardly the disk can inhibit the return of the fins to their prefire undeployed position and can provide a seating position for the fins at a precise angular position with respect to the axis.
In embodiments, the disk may be a positioned in the shot cup portion spaced from the bottom of the cup portion. The fins may have a hinge line or hinge region near the rearward of the disk. Upon firing the inertia of the shot pushes the disk rearwardly where it may engage cam surfaces on the fins to provide a sustained force urging them outwardly. Upon exiting the barrel, the fins deploy outwardly and the wind provided by the moving wad and shot facilitates complete deployment.
In embodiments, the component may be a dome shaped component in the propellant cup portion that upon compression, radially expands thereby providing a sustained radial compressive force on each of the fins proximate bend zones of the fins. Upon exiting the muzzle, the radial compressive force causes or contributes to the fins flaring outwardly. Additionally or alternatively, the component can secure the fins in the flared position by obstructing their return to the unflared position. The component may be secured in a seated position by catches on the component and/or wad, for example circumferential ribs on a central stem. A feature and advantage of embodiments utilizing an axially movable component is that associated with the component an axial space provides a buffer between the expanding propellant gases and the shot that can reduce shot deformation and over compaction in the shot cup portion.
In embodiments, the fins may be positioned close to the base or bottom of the shot cup, and there may be an abbreviated cup portion or no propellant cup portion connected to the shot cup. A disk that is pushed forward upon firing provides outward radial pressure to fins near a bend zone such that they are urged outwardly and upon exiting the muzzle release to a flared position.
In embodiments of the invention, the fins are configured to have predefined fold zones defined by thinning of material or thickening of material at an intended fold line whereby they fold at a much wider range of pressures, in particular, at lower muzzle pressures.
In embodiments of the invention, the propellant cup portion has a plurality of forward facing fins with a bend region positioned proximate the rearward edge of the wads. The fins are separated by axially extending wall sections that support the bend regions at the rearward edge. The fins are defined by a U-shaped cut with the “U” open end facing rearwardly. Upon exiting the muzzle, the gas expansion forces open the window such that bend regions are defined at the junctures of the fins and the axially extending wall sections.
In embodiments the cup portion and shot cup portion may be formed of different materials and joined together such as be welding or by overmolding. This allows use of a readily expandable propellant cup portion with fins, and a much stronger, more rigid shot cup portion.
Referring to
The wad 60 is shown in detail in prefiring position or form in
The wad is formed of a polymer such as polyethylene and the gussets are unitarily formed therewith. In the pre fired form or state as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The invention is not restricted to the details of the foregoing embodiment (s). The invention extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any incorporated by reference references, any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed The above references in all sections of this application are herein incorporated by references in their entirety for all purposes.
Although specific examples have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose could be substituted for the specific examples shown. This application is intended to cover adaptations or variations of the present subject matter. Therefore, it is intended that the invention be defined by the attached claims and their legal equivalents, as well as the following illustrative aspects. The above described aspects embodiments of the invention are merely descriptive of its principles and are not to be considered limiting. Further modifications of the invention herein disclosed will occur to those skilled in the respective arts and all such modifications are deemed to be within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/597,508 filed Oct. 9, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/884,227 filed Jan. 30, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 9,879,957, filed Oct. 17, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Application No. 62/242,177 filed Oct. 15, 2015, the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1742817 | Larson | Jan 1930 | A |
1864916 | Gachassin-Lafite | Jun 1932 | A |
3234877 | Herter | Feb 1966 | A |
3279375 | Herter | Oct 1966 | A |
3299813 | Rickey | Jan 1967 | A |
3368489 | Herter | Feb 1968 | A |
3469527 | Pace | Sep 1969 | A |
3516360 | Lathrope et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3623431 | Hendricks | Nov 1971 | A |
3670650 | McCaffrey et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3730095 | Lage | May 1973 | A |
3974770 | Clark, Jr. | Aug 1976 | A |
3974775 | Kerzman et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4164903 | Bouza | Aug 1979 | A |
4295426 | Genco et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
D365867 | Flanagan | Jan 1996 | S |
5623118 | Jackson | Apr 1997 | A |
5644100 | Puckett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5874689 | Alkhatib et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5970878 | Gardner | Oct 1999 | A |
5979330 | Cornell | Nov 1999 | A |
6260484 | Billings | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6367388 | Billings | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6539873 | Diller | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7150229 | Gardner | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171904 | Diller | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7810432 | Stevens | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8220393 | Schluckebier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8418620 | Frank | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8555785 | Cross | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8800449 | Schluckebier | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9506732 | Schultz | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9739582 | Billings | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9778002 | Burczynski et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9879957 | Moser et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
D809622 | Moser et al. | Feb 2018 | S |
D810226 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2018 | S |
9897424 | Sorensen et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9982977 | Menefee, III | May 2018 | B2 |
20100192794 | Cross | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130055916 | Menefee, III | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130055917 | Menefee, III | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130228090 | Billings | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140076187 | Schluckebier et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140366765 | Havens et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150176954 | Burczynski et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20170108318 | Moser et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170160062 | Havens et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201048 | Jun 1983 | DE |
92430 | Nov 1968 | FR |
2127342 | Mar 1971 | FR |
2308901 | Mar 1974 | FR |
2257890 | Aug 1975 | FR |
2559892 | Aug 1985 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Simpson, Layne, “Great Gun/Load Combo for Gobblers”, shootingtimes.com, Jan. 3, 2011, p. 7 of 15 (Year: 2011). |
.45 Colt, “Can you explain federal flight control to me?”, the firingline.com, Mar. 27, 2010, entry #8 p. 3 of 6 (Years: 2010). |
Admitted prior art (pre Oct. 2015), photographs, 2 pages. |
Sabot Designs LLC, “Long Range Flechette Sabots”, 1998-2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210254952 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62242177 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16597508 | Oct 2019 | US |
Child | 17188246 | US | |
Parent | 15884227 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16597508 | US | |
Parent | 15295700 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 15884227 | US |