The present invention concerns a shoulder prosthesis glenoid component.
In the field of shoulder prostheses, it is routine to use a glenoid component comprising an articulation surface, a bearing surface on a shoulder glenoid cavity and means for fixing the component in the glenoid cavity. These means may constitute screws, pegs, rods or keels or combinations of these means. It is known in particular from US-A-2001/0037153 to produce components provided with cylindrical studs of circular section.
These solutions have drawbacks linked to the mode of implanting the glenoid component in the glenoid cavity of the shoulder. The conjugate effects of movement of the arm and aging of the component tend to loosen the fixing of the component and cause deterioration of its fixing means. In particular, the eccentric forces exerted by the head of the humerus on the articulation surface are liable to reduce the firmness of a keel-type fixing of the glenoid component, in that part of the keel is anchored in the spongy part of the bone. Moreover, studs such as are known from the aforementioned document are not able to block rotation of the components in the glenoid cavity.
It is these drawbacks that the invention aims more particularly to remedy by proposing a new keel-type glenoid component the fixing of which is made reliable and durable.
To this end, the invention provides a shoulder prosthesis glenoid component having on one of its faces an articulation surface adapted to cooperate with a humeral head and an opposite face. This component further includes a keel for anchoring it in the glenoid cavity of a shoulder, comprising a body that extends from an opposite face adapted to be immobilized in the glenoid cavity. This component is characterized in that the keel comprises at least one fin projecting from the body which runs over at least a part of the perimeter of the body.
Thanks to the invention, the fixing of the component in the glenoid cavity is improved compared to fixing using a keel with no fins, the free spaces created by the fins encouraging locking of the component in the glenoid cavity by bone growth in these spaces. Adding fins to the keel of the glenoid component therefore makes it possible to improve the stability and the service life of the prosthesis.
According to advantageous but non-mandatory aspects of the invention, such a component may incorporate one or more of the following features, in all technically permissible combinations:
The invention will be better understood and other advantages thereof will become more clearly apparent in the light of the following description of a glenoid component of various embodiments of the invention given by way of example only and with reference to the drawings, in which:
The glenoid component 2 represented in
The component 2 has on the side opposite its articulation surface SA a face SG that bears on the glenoid cavity G. This face SG can be superposed on that of the glenoid cavity and is generally of convex shape. However, as a function of the shape of the socket G, the face SG may have other shapes, notably plane in order to fit a flat-bottomed glenoid cavity G.
For fixing it into the glenoid cavity G, the glenoid component 2 includes an anchor keel 4. This keel 4 consists mainly of a body 5 extending from the central region of the bearing face SG. This keel is intended to be immobilized in a drilled hole P or the like of corresponding size and shape produced in the socket G. In practice, the keel 4 may have an external envelope of varied dimensions and shapes so as to have in cross section a non-circular peripheral contour in order to block rotation of the component in the glenoid cavity G. In particular, the keel 4 may preferably have an envelope of truncated pyramid shape, the base of which may be substantially square or rectangular. Alternatively, this envelope may be of frustoconical shape with a substantially elliptical base. In all cases, the geometry of the body 5 defines a longitudinal main axis X-X′ transverse to the articulation surface SA and to the bearing face SG.
As shown generically in
References common to the specific embodiments described hereinafter remain unchanged. The references that differentiate these embodiments include a numerical prefix corresponding to the numbering of the embodiment described.
In the first embodiment represented in
This embodiment has, among others, the particular benefit of encouraging bone growth producing a continuous volume of bone material representing a high fixing power and firmness. This volume of material may equally be produced by a bone substitute, which may be introduced into the drilled hole P.
In a second embodiment represented in
In a third embodiment of the invention represented in
The implantation of such a series of fins 6 makes it possible, among other things, to improve the immobilization of the component 2 in the glenoid cavity G. The distance D between two successive fins of the series, which is defined by the distance between the surface 11 of one of the fins and the surface 12 of the next fin in the series, is chosen in order to optimize the stability of fixing and the efficacy of bone growth. A small distance D between the fins 6 may induce a high stability of fixing and fast bone growth in the gaps, but the bony reinforcement created in this gap will be less firm than a bony reinforcement generated between fins with a greater spacing. The distance D between the two successive fins may be different from one pair of fins to another.
As shown in
It will be noted that the presence of such a hole 31 may be considered independently of the presence of the fins 6.
In a fourth embodiment represented in
In this regard, the body 5 of the keel 4 may be of parallelepiped shape with the overall external envelope of the keel resembling a truncated cone with an elliptical base or a truncated pyramid, as shown in
The body 5 of the keel 4 may equally have the external shape of a truncated cone with an elliptical base or a truncated pyramid, as shown in
As shown in
In a fifth embodiment of the invention shown in
Between these two cylindrical parts 52 and 54 extends a central connecting wall 56 on which the fins 6 are implanted. The fins thus extend between the two cylindrical parts 52 and 54.
The dimensions of the section of these cylindrical parts 52 and 54 correspond to the dimensions of drilled holes P produced in the glenoid cavity G for implanting the component 2. If these cylindrical parts 52 and 54 are of circular section, the dimensions taken into account to define the geometry of the cylindrical parts is that of the drill used to produce the drilled holes P in the glenoid cavity G. A slightly tight fit may be chosen in order to obtain greater stability of the implantation of the component 2.
In this embodiment, the fins 6 may be made of a deformable material able to exert a pressure on the walls of a slot produced in the glenoid cavity G to connect the two drilled holes P. For example, the fins 6 may be made of a polymer material or polyethylene.
In a sixth embodiment of the invention shown in
The elastic ring 62 is housed in a peripheral external groove 64 formed on the body 5 of the keel 4 that extends over the whole of the perimeter of the keel.
The exterior dimensions of the elastic ring 62 in the relaxed configuration are greater than the dimensions of the drilled hole P produced in the glenoid cavity G. Moreover, the elastic ring 62 has an oblique peripheral edge 66 converging toward the longitudinal main axis X-X′ of the body 5 of the keel 4 in the direction of the end 8 of the keel. When inserting the glenoid component 2 in the glenoid cavity G, this particular geometry enables sliding of the cortical wall C of the glenoid cavity along the oblique edge 66 of the elastic ring 62 and retraction of the elastic ring into the peripheral groove 64. Once the component has been inserted in the glenoid cavity G, the elastic ring 62 relaxes into the spongy part of the glenoid cavity G, blocking the movements of the component 2 along the longitudinal axis X-X′ of the body 5 of the keel 4 thanks to its exterior dimensions being greater than the dimensions of the drilled hole in the cortical wall. A plurality of elastic rings 62 may be used in this embodiment.
It will be noted that the presence of such a ring 62 may be considered independently of the presence of the fins 6.
In a seventh embodiment of the invention shown in
This keel geometry makes it possible to obtain increased stability about the longitudinal axis X-X′ by preventing rotation of the glenoid component 2 about that axis.
The position of the keel 4 on the bearing face SG may then be eccentric relative to an axis A70 passing through the geometrical centre of the face SG and substantially perpendicular to that surface.
In an eighth embodiment of the invention shown in
In a ninth embodiment shown in
The series 92 of fins is wider than the series 91 of fins, i.e. the average distance d1 between the external surface of the body 5 of the keel 4 and the free edge 93 of the fins of the series 91 is less than the distance d2 between the external surface of the body 5 of the keel 4 and the free edge 94 of the fins of the series 92.
This particular geometry makes it possible for the fins of the series 92 to fulfil the primary fixing function, which consists in stable implantation of the component in the glenoid cavity, thanks to their width being greater than those of the fins of the series 91. Thanks to their narrow width, the first fins 91 fulfil the secondary fixing function by virtue of bone growth in the gaps that they delimit.
In a tenth embodiment of the invention shown in
In an eleventh embodiment of the invention shown in
In order to provide a space for movement of the polymer material element 112, the geometry of the metal shell 114 provides a clearance J11 between the surfaces of contact between the polymer element 112 and the metal shell 114 at the level of an area of the glenoid component 2 situated outside the glenoid cavity G. By authorizing this freedom of movement of the polymer element 112, plastic deformation of that element is prevented and the forces exerted on the component 2 where it is implanted in the glenoid cavity G are reduced, which makes it possible to increase its service life and stability.
In a twelfth embodiment of the invention shown in
To counter the tendency of the flexible sheath 120 to expel the rod 121, having the rod protrude from the flexible sheath 120 and providing on it a shoulder 126 widening the part of the rod projecting from the flexible sheath may be envisaged. In order to block movements in translation of the rod 121 in the flexible sheath 120, this shoulder 126 bears against the end 124 of the flexible sheath anchored in the glenoid cavity G.
The end 8 of the body 5 of the keel 4 carried by the rod 121 advantageously includes at least one hole 128 the function of which is to encourage bone growth in the space created in order to increase the stability of the fixing.
In a variant that is not shown, the glenoid component 2 may include, in addition to the anchor keel 4, an eccentric peg projecting from the face SG and making it possible to improve the fixing of the component in the socket G, in particular blocking its rotation.
Of course, the features of the embodiments shown may be combined with each other in the context of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1050376 | Jan 2010 | FR | national |
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/516,211, filed Jan. 25, 2013, which is a national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/069585, filed Dec. 14, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/286,286, filed Dec. 14, 2009, which are hereby incorporated in their by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3896504 | Fischer | Jul 1975 | A |
4725280 | Laure | Feb 1988 | A |
4986833 | Worland | Jan 1991 | A |
5032132 | Matsen, III et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033036 | Ohmori et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5080673 | Burkhead | Jan 1992 | A |
5108446 | Wagner | Apr 1992 | A |
5458637 | Hayes | Oct 1995 | A |
5489309 | Lackey et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5489311 | Cipolletti | Feb 1996 | A |
5531973 | Sarv | Jul 1996 | A |
5662657 | Carn | Sep 1997 | A |
5702447 | Walch | Dec 1997 | A |
5776202 | Copf et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800551 | Williamson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5954722 | Bono | Sep 1999 | A |
6102954 | Albrektsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6171342 | O'Neil et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6228119 | Ondrla et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228120 | Leonard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6406495 | Schoch | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6508841 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6514287 | Ondrla et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6673115 | Resch et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679916 | Frankle et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6699289 | Iannotti et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6761740 | Tornier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783549 | Stone et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790234 | Frankle | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6860903 | Mears et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6911047 | Rockwood et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6953478 | Bouttens et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6969406 | Tornier | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7160328 | Rockwood et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169184 | Pria | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175663 | Stone | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7175665 | German et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7204854 | Guederian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7316715 | Plaskon | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7462197 | Tornier | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462199 | Justin et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7604665 | Iannotti et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608109 | Dalla Pria | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611539 | Bouttens et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621961 | Stone | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637928 | Fernandez | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648530 | Habermeyer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7666522 | Justin et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7753959 | Berelsman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766969 | Justin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7854768 | Wiley et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7892287 | Deffenbaugh | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7922769 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927335 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7993408 | Meridew et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007523 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8048161 | Guederian et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062376 | Shultz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070820 | Winslow et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092545 | Coon et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8206453 | Cooney, III et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8231683 | Lappin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241365 | Williams, Jr. et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8287600 | Angibaud | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308807 | Seebeck et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8357201 | Mayer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361157 | Bouttens et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8425614 | Winslow et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8444680 | Dooney, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449617 | McDaniel et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8454702 | Smits et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8465548 | Long | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480750 | Long | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8532806 | Masson | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8556902 | Ek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556980 | Deffenbaugh | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556981 | Jones et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8591591 | Winslow et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597334 | Mocanu | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8632597 | Lappin | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8690951 | Baum et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8753402 | Winslow et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8790402 | Monaghan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8840676 | Belew | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8864834 | Boileau et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8961611 | Long | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9114017 | Lappin | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9233003 | Roche et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9498345 | Burkhead et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9545311 | Courtney, Jr. et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9629725 | Gargac et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10034757 | Kovacs et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10064734 | Burkhead et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10251755 | Boileau et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10342669 | Hopkins | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10357373 | Gargac et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10524922 | Courtney, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10722374 | Hodorek et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010037153 | Rockwood, Jr. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020095214 | Hyde, Jr. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030055507 | McDevitt et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030149485 | Tornier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040030394 | Horber | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059424 | Guederian | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040106928 | Ek | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040220673 | Pria | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040220674 | Pria | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050049709 | Tornier | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060039 | Cyprien | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050143831 | Justin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149044 | Justin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050261775 | Baum et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278030 | Tornier | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060074353 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100714 | Ensign | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122705 | Morgan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142865 | Hyde, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060200248 | Beguin et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200249 | Beguin et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070016304 | Chudik | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055380 | Berelsman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100458 | Dalla Pria | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142921 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156246 | Meswania et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179624 | Stone et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219638 | Jones et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244563 | Roche et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244564 | Ferrand | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080183297 | Boileau et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080269906 | Iannotti et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294268 | Baum et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306601 | Dreyfuss | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090125113 | Guederian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149961 | Dallmann | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090204225 | Meridew et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216332 | Splieth et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090281630 | Delince et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292364 | Linares | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100016975 | Iannotti et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023068 | Bouttens et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049327 | Isch et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087927 | Roche et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100161066 | Iannotti et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100217399 | Groh | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228352 | Courtney et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234959 | Roche et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274359 | Brunnarius et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100291401 | Medina et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331990 | Mroczkowski | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110035013 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110118846 | Katrana et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144760 | Wong et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110190899 | Pierce et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110282393 | Garlach et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004733 | Hodorek et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029647 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120130498 | Long | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165954 | Nimal | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191201 | Smits et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209392 | Angibaud et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221112 | Lappin | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232670 | Bojarski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239156 | De Wilde et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253467 | Frankle | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277880 | Winslow et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130018483 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130053968 | Nardini et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130096631 | Leung et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110470 | Vanasse et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144393 | Mutchler | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150972 | Iannotti et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150973 | Splieth et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130150975 | Iannotti et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130226309 | Daigo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231754 | Daigo et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253656 | Long | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261751 | Lappin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261752 | Lappin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130264749 | Jones et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282135 | Sun et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140025173 | Cardon et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140142711 | Maroney et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140194995 | Koka | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140257499 | Winslow et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277180 | Paolino et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140371863 | Vanasse et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150073424 | Couture et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150094819 | Iannotti et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150142122 | Bickley et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150150688 | Vanasse et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150272741 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305877 | Gargac et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160045323 | Kovacs et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160166392 | Vanasse et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160270922 | Pressacco et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287401 | Muir et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160310285 | Kovacs et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160324649 | Hodorek et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170027709 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170042687 | Boileau et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170042690 | Burkhead et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170172764 | Muir et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170273795 | Neichel et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170273801 | Hodorek et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180064537 | Pressacco et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180078377 | Gargac et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180161169 | Cardon et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180243102 | Burkhead, Jr. et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20200030108 | Orphanos et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200179126 | Courtney, Jr. et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200237519 | Ball et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10123517 | Nov 2002 | DE |
0581667 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0776636 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1323395 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1013246 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1064890 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1488764 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1762201 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1762201 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1515758 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2057970 | May 2009 | EP |
1639966 | Sep 2009 | EP |
1927328 | Jan 2011 | EP |
1902689 | Nov 2011 | EP |
1996125 | May 2013 | EP |
2335655 | Jul 2013 | EP |
1951161 | Apr 2014 | EP |
1973498 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2481376 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2601912 | Jul 2016 | EP |
2567019 | Jan 1986 | FR |
2739151 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2776506 | Aug 2000 | FR |
2955247 | Jul 2011 | FR |
2971144 | Aug 2012 | FR |
2977791 | Jul 2014 | FR |
WO 2011073169 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011150180 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2015068035 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2015103090 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO 2017007565 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO 2019079104 | Apr 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cementless Fixation Using a Polyethyene Oseo-Integration Peg as Used on the Freeman-Samuelson Knee brochure, produced by Finsbury Instruments Limited London in conjunction with Adrian Tuke Limited, 1982. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10155440, dated Aug. 9, 2010, 6 pages. |
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,750, filed Mar. 5, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/EP2010/069585, dated Apr. 11, 2011, 9 pages. |
Anatomical Shoulder™ Inverse/Reverse System Surgical Technique, Product Brochure, Zimmer, Inc., published 2006, in 32 pages. |
Arthrex, “Arthrex Releases Univers Revers™ Shoulder Arthroplasty System in the United States—First Surgery Successfully Performed in Chillicothe, OH”, Jun. 18, 2013. |
Biomet, “Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder System”, 2013. |
Boileau et al., “Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: A prospective, double-blind, randomized study,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Jul./Aug. 2002, vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 351-359. |
Boileau et al., “Metal-backed glenoid implant with polyethylene insert is not a viable long-term therapeutic option,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Feb. 2015, pp. 1-10. |
Castagna et al., “Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Oct. 2010, vol. 92-B, No. 10, pp. 1410-1415. |
Clement et al., “An uncemented metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: factors affecting survival and outcome,” The Japanese Orthopaedic Association, published online Sep. 26, 2012, vol. 18, pp. 22-28. |
DJO Surgical, Reverse® shoulder prosthesis Surgical Technique, Feb. 2008. |
Eclipse™ Stemless Shoulder Prosthesis, Surgical Technique Guide, Anthrex GmbH, 2014, in 12 pages. |
Epoca Shoulder Arthroplasty System, Synthes, Inc., Apr. 2008, in 4 pages. |
Epoca Shoulder Arthroplasty System—Stem and Glenoid Technique Guide, Synthes, Inc., Apr. 2008, in 56 pages. |
Innovative Design Orthopaedics, “Verso® Shoulder Surgical Technique”, 2013. |
Kany et al., “A convertible shoulder system: is it useful in total shoulder arthroplasty revisions?” International Orthopaedics, published online Oct. 16, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 299-304. |
Katz et al., “New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases,” published online Oct. 27, 2012, vol. 23, pp. 27-34. |
Montoya et al., “Midterm results of a total shoulder prosthesis fixed with a cementless glenoid component,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, May 2013, vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 628-635. |
SMR Axioma® TT Metal Back Surgical Technique, Product Brochure, Lima Corporate, dated Sep. 2013, in 48 pages. |
Taunton et al., “Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Metal-Backed, Bone-Ingrowth Glenoid Component,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Oct. 2008, vol. 90-A, Issue 10, pp. 2180-2188. |
Teissier et al., “The TESS reverse shoulder arthroplasty without a stem in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions: clinical and radiographic results,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Jan. 2015, vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 45-51. |
The Anatomical Shoulder™: A true system approach, Product Brochure, Zimmer UK Ltd, printed 2006, in 6 pages. |
Univers Revers™ Total Shoulder System, Surgical Technique Guide, Anthrex Inc., Version D, revised Jul. 2, 2015, in 28 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190076261 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61286286 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13516211 | US | |
Child | 16184670 | US |