Shoulder prosthesis glenoid component

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11160661
  • Patent Number
    11,160,661
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 8, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 2, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
This shoulder prosthesis glenoid component (2) has on one of its faces an articulation surface (SA) adapted to cooperate with a humeral head and having, on an opposite face (SG) adapted to be immobilized on the glenoid cavity (G) of a shoulder, a keel (4) for anchoring it in the glenoid cavity (G). This keel (4) comprises a body (5) that extends from the opposite face (SG). The keel (4) comprises at least one fin (6) projecting from the body (5) 2 which runs over at least a part of the perimeter of the body (5).
Description

The present invention concerns a shoulder prosthesis glenoid component.


In the field of shoulder prostheses, it is routine to use a glenoid component comprising an articulation surface, a bearing surface on a shoulder glenoid cavity and means for fixing the component in the glenoid cavity. These means may constitute screws, pegs, rods or keels or combinations of these means. It is known in particular from US-A-2001/0037153 to produce components provided with cylindrical studs of circular section.


These solutions have drawbacks linked to the mode of implanting the glenoid component in the glenoid cavity of the shoulder. The conjugate effects of movement of the arm and aging of the component tend to loosen the fixing of the component and cause deterioration of its fixing means. In particular, the eccentric forces exerted by the head of the humerus on the articulation surface are liable to reduce the firmness of a keel-type fixing of the glenoid component, in that part of the keel is anchored in the spongy part of the bone. Moreover, studs such as are known from the aforementioned document are not able to block rotation of the components in the glenoid cavity.


It is these drawbacks that the invention aims more particularly to remedy by proposing a new keel-type glenoid component the fixing of which is made reliable and durable.


To this end, the invention provides a shoulder prosthesis glenoid component having on one of its faces an articulation surface adapted to cooperate with a humeral head and an opposite face. This component further includes a keel for anchoring it in the glenoid cavity of a shoulder, comprising a body that extends from an opposite face adapted to be immobilized in the glenoid cavity. This component is characterized in that the keel comprises at least one fin projecting from the body which runs over at least a part of the perimeter of the body.


Thanks to the invention, the fixing of the component in the glenoid cavity is improved compared to fixing using a keel with no fins, the free spaces created by the fins encouraging locking of the component in the glenoid cavity by bone growth in these spaces. Adding fins to the keel of the glenoid component therefore makes it possible to improve the stability and the service life of the prosthesis.


According to advantageous but non-mandatory aspects of the invention, such a component may incorporate one or more of the following features, in all technically permissible combinations:

    • The body of the keel has in cross section a non-circular peripheral contour.
    • The fin or at least one of the fins has a helicoidal shape and winds around the body.
    • The body comprises at least one internal passage opening onto the external surface of the body and connected to an orifice for injecting a fluid such as a bone substitute or a solution containing growth factors.
    • The fin or at least one of the fins extends in a plane substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal main axis of the body.
    • The body comprises at least two separate cylindrical parts the respective axes of which are substantially parallel to each other and between which the fin or fins extend(s).
    • The body includes at least one external peripheral groove for receiving an elastic ring adapted to expand in the glenoid cavity.
    • The body has a star-shaped cross section including at least three branches and the keel has an eccentric position relative to a central axis of the component.
    • The fin or at least one of the fins has a substantially semicircular peripheral contour.
    • The keel comprises a first series of substantially parallel fins.
    • The keel further comprises at least one second series of parallel fins, of width greater than that of the first fins and placed at a distance from the opposite face along a longitudinal main axis of the body less than that of the first series of fins.
    • The fins of the or each second series of fins have a shape that is geometrically similar to the shape of the opposite face.
    • The articulation surface is carried by an element adapted to be mounted in a preferably metal shell of the component carrying the opposite face and in one piece with the body of the keel.
    • The body of the keel comprises a flexible sheath provided with the fin or fins into which a part in one piece with the opposite face is adapted to fit.
    • The fins are made of a deformable material chosen from materials such as polyethylene or other polymer materials.
    • The body of the keel includes a hole passing through the body.





The invention will be better understood and other advantages thereof will become more clearly apparent in the light of the following description of a glenoid component of various embodiments of the invention given by way of example only and with reference to the drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a front view of a glenoid component of the invention, corresponding to a generic embodiment and shown implanted in the glenoid cavity of a shoulder.



FIG. 2 is a front view of a glenoid component according to a specific first embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 is a front view of a glenoid component according to a second embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a front view of a glenoid component according to a third embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5a is a front view of a glenoid component according to a fourth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5b is a front view of a glenoid component according to a variant of the fourth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5c is a front view of a glenoid component according to a second variant of the fourth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 is a front view of a glenoid component according to a fifth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the glenoid component from FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 is a front view of a glenoid component according to a sixth embodiment of the invention implanted in the glenoid cavity of a shoulder.



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a glenoid component according to a seventh embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a glenoid component according to an eighth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a glenoid component according to a ninth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a glenoid component according to a tenth embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 13 is a side view of the glenoid component from FIG. 12.



FIG. 14 is a section on a median plane of a glenoid component according to an eleventh embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 15 is a section in a median plane of a glenoid component according to a twelfth embodiment of the invention implanted in the glenoid cavity of a shoulder socket.





The glenoid component 2 represented in FIGS. 1 to 15 is adapted to be fixed on the glenoid cavity G of a shoulder of a human being. The glenoid component 2 has an articulation surface SA, here generally concave, intended to cooperate with a humeral component, not shown, that may be prosthetic or natural. The surface SA may equally be convex in order to cooperate with a concave spherical surface of the humeral component, notably in the case of a reversed prosthesis.


The component 2 has on the side opposite its articulation surface SA a face SG that bears on the glenoid cavity G. This face SG can be superposed on that of the glenoid cavity and is generally of convex shape. However, as a function of the shape of the socket G, the face SG may have other shapes, notably plane in order to fit a flat-bottomed glenoid cavity G.


For fixing it into the glenoid cavity G, the glenoid component 2 includes an anchor keel 4. This keel 4 consists mainly of a body 5 extending from the central region of the bearing face SG. This keel is intended to be immobilized in a drilled hole P or the like of corresponding size and shape produced in the socket G. In practice, the keel 4 may have an external envelope of varied dimensions and shapes so as to have in cross section a non-circular peripheral contour in order to block rotation of the component in the glenoid cavity G. In particular, the keel 4 may preferably have an envelope of truncated pyramid shape, the base of which may be substantially square or rectangular. Alternatively, this envelope may be of frustoconical shape with a substantially elliptical base. In all cases, the geometry of the body 5 defines a longitudinal main axis X-X′ transverse to the articulation surface SA and to the bearing face SG.


As shown generically in FIG. 1, the keel 4 of the component 2 is provided with at least one fin 6. Each fin is constituted of a wall projecting from the body 5 and has two substantially parallel opposite surfaces 11 and 12 separated by a distance e that defines the thickness of the fin. The fin or fins may run along part or the whole of the perimeter of the keel 4, this perimeter being defined by the peripheral surface enveloping the body 5 around the longitudinal axis X-X′ from the face SG at the axially opposite end 8 of this body. For fixing the implant, the distance between the bearing surface SG and the first fin 6 advantageously corresponds to the average thickness of cortical bone tissue constituting the surface of the glenoid cavity. Thus during insertion of the prosthesis all of the fins 6 are inserted into the spongy bone tissue of the glenoid cavity, trapping the cortical structure between the fins 6 and the bearing surface SG in order to render extraction of the prosthesis more difficult.


References common to the specific embodiments described hereinafter remain unchanged. The references that differentiate these embodiments include a numerical prefix corresponding to the numbering of the embodiment described.


In the first embodiment represented in FIG. 2 the keel 4 is provided with a single fin 6. This fin 6 is of helicoidal shape and winds around the body 5 of the keel 4 along the longitudinal main axis X-X′ and with a pitch that either is constant or varies. The helicoid described by the fin 6 advantageously winds continuously around the body 5 of the keel 4.


This embodiment has, among others, the particular benefit of encouraging bone growth producing a continuous volume of bone material representing a high fixing power and firmness. This volume of material may equally be produced by a bone substitute, which may be introduced into the drilled hole P.


In a second embodiment represented in FIG. 3 the body 5 of the keel 4 comprises a network of internal passages 22. These internal passages 22 open onto the external surface of the body 5, preferably between two successive fins 6. They advantageously pass completely through the body of the keel, communicate with each other and are connected to an orifice 24 for injecting a fluid. This injection orifice 24 is preferably situated on the articulation surface SA of the component 2 and must be used to inject into the internal passages 22 a bone substitute, preferably bioresorbable, or a solution containing growth factors. The injection of a solution containing growth factors has the object of accelerating and encouraging bone growth in the gap induced by the presence of the fins in order to make firm the fixing of the component 2 into the glenoid cavity G.


In a third embodiment of the invention represented in FIG. 4 the keel 4 includes a series of fins 6, the surfaces 11 and 12 of each fin being parallel to the surfaces of the other fins. The keel 4 can thus have a plurality of parallel fins 6 over a part of its perimeter, as in FIG. 4. As represented in this figure, the fins 6 may be inclined in the direction of the end 8. This inclination makes it possible to facilitate the insertion of the component into the glenoid cavity and to prevent its withdrawal, the fins 6 tending to spread apart in the spongy tissue.


The implantation of such a series of fins 6 makes it possible, among other things, to improve the immobilization of the component 2 in the glenoid cavity G. The distance D between two successive fins of the series, which is defined by the distance between the surface 11 of one of the fins and the surface 12 of the next fin in the series, is chosen in order to optimize the stability of fixing and the efficacy of bone growth. A small distance D between the fins 6 may induce a high stability of fixing and fast bone growth in the gaps, but the bony reinforcement created in this gap will be less firm than a bony reinforcement generated between fins with a greater spacing. The distance D between the two successive fins may be different from one pair of fins to another.


As shown in FIG. 4, the keel 4 may include at least one hole 31 passing completely through the body 5, preferably in a direction corresponding to the smallest dimension of the cross section of the body 5. Like the fins 6, this hole serves to improve the retention of the component by encouraging bone regrowth in the space created.


It will be noted that the presence of such a hole 31 may be considered independently of the presence of the fins 6.


In a fourth embodiment represented in FIGS. 5a, 5b and 5c the fins 6 of the keel 4 are disposed perpendicularly to the longitudinal main axis X-X′ of the body 5 of the keel. The surfaces 11 and 12 of the walls constituting the fins are thus contained in planes perpendicular to the longitudinal axis X-X′. This disposition of the fins 6 provides a more efficacious fixing if the forces that are exerted on the component 2 are directed along the longitudinal axis X-X′.


In this regard, the body 5 of the keel 4 may be of parallelepiped shape with the overall external envelope of the keel resembling a truncated cone with an elliptical base or a truncated pyramid, as shown in FIG. 5b. To this end, the width of the fins, i.e. the dimension of their projection from the external surface of the body 5, decreases between the bearing face SG and the end 8. This increases the stability of the component 2 near the bearing face SG.


The body 5 of the keel 4 may equally have the external shape of a truncated cone with an elliptical base or a truncated pyramid, as shown in FIGS. 5a and 5c, the fins 6 being of identical width. The overall exterior envelope of the keel 4 is then conical. In a variant that is not shown, the body 5 may be frustoconical or pyramidal and the keel 4 have a cylindrical envelope with an elliptical base and vice-versa. The body 5 and/or the external envelope of the keel 4 may equally have an inverted cone or inverted pyramid shape the area of the section of which increases toward the end 8.


As shown in FIG. 5c the body 5 of the keel 4 may include an opening 41 extending along the axis X-X′ over a middle part of the body 5. This opening 41 may extend along the axis X-X′ over all or part of the body 5. Such an opening enables movement toward each other of the two lateral parts created in this way when inserting the component. The tendency of these two parts to move apart makes it possible to improve the retention of the component.


In a fifth embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the body 5 of the keel 4 comprises two separate and parallel cylindrical parts 52 and 54. These cylindrical parts, the number of which is not limited, may be of circular section. These cylindrical parts extend from the bearing face SG along longitudinal parallel axes A52 and A54. The two cylindrical parts 52 and 54 advantageously extend parallel to the longitudinal main axis X-X′ of the body of the keel. Alternatively, the cylindrical parts 52 and 54 may extend along longitudinal axes A52 and A54 inclined one relative to the other and also relative to the axis X-X′.


Between these two cylindrical parts 52 and 54 extends a central connecting wall 56 on which the fins 6 are implanted. The fins thus extend between the two cylindrical parts 52 and 54.


The dimensions of the section of these cylindrical parts 52 and 54 correspond to the dimensions of drilled holes P produced in the glenoid cavity G for implanting the component 2. If these cylindrical parts 52 and 54 are of circular section, the dimensions taken into account to define the geometry of the cylindrical parts is that of the drill used to produce the drilled holes P in the glenoid cavity G. A slightly tight fit may be chosen in order to obtain greater stability of the implantation of the component 2.


In this embodiment, the fins 6 may be made of a deformable material able to exert a pressure on the walls of a slot produced in the glenoid cavity G to connect the two drilled holes P. For example, the fins 6 may be made of a polymer material or polyethylene.


In a sixth embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 8 the body 5 of the keel 4 includes at least one elastic ring 62. The function of this elastic ring 62 is to exert pressure on the wall of the drilled hole produced in the glenoid cavity G in order to strengthen the firmness of the implantation.


The elastic ring 62 is housed in a peripheral external groove 64 formed on the body 5 of the keel 4 that extends over the whole of the perimeter of the keel.


The exterior dimensions of the elastic ring 62 in the relaxed configuration are greater than the dimensions of the drilled hole P produced in the glenoid cavity G. Moreover, the elastic ring 62 has an oblique peripheral edge 66 converging toward the longitudinal main axis X-X′ of the body 5 of the keel 4 in the direction of the end 8 of the keel. When inserting the glenoid component 2 in the glenoid cavity G, this particular geometry enables sliding of the cortical wall C of the glenoid cavity along the oblique edge 66 of the elastic ring 62 and retraction of the elastic ring into the peripheral groove 64. Once the component has been inserted in the glenoid cavity G, the elastic ring 62 relaxes into the spongy part of the glenoid cavity G, blocking the movements of the component 2 along the longitudinal axis X-X′ of the body 5 of the keel 4 thanks to its exterior dimensions being greater than the dimensions of the drilled hole in the cortical wall. A plurality of elastic rings 62 may be used in this embodiment.


It will be noted that the presence of such a ring 62 may be considered independently of the presence of the fins 6.


In a seventh embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 9, the body 5 of the keel 4 has on a plane perpendicular to its longitudinal axis X-X′ a star-shaped cross section including at least three branches. The keel 5 then consists of at least three contiguous flanges 71, 72 and 73 each oriented relative to the other two at two substantially equal angles. The fins 6 are implanted on the three contiguous flanges 71, 72 and 73.


This keel geometry makes it possible to obtain increased stability about the longitudinal axis X-X′ by preventing rotation of the glenoid component 2 about that axis.


The position of the keel 4 on the bearing face SG may then be eccentric relative to an axis A70 passing through the geometrical centre of the face SG and substantially perpendicular to that surface.


In an eighth embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 10 the fins 6 have surfaces 11 and 12 with semicircular free edges. If the body 5 has substantially the shape of a substantially plane thick wall, the fins 6 may extend from each side 81 and 82 of that wall.


In a ninth embodiment shown in FIG. 11, the keel 4 comprises two separate series 91 and 92 of fins 6. These two series of fins are staggered along the longitudinal main axis X-X′ of the body 5. The series 91 of fins adjoins the end 8 of the keel and the second series 92 of fins is on the longitudinal axis X-X′ between the first series 91 of fins and the bearing face SG on the glenoid cavity.


The series 92 of fins is wider than the series 91 of fins, i.e. the average distance d1 between the external surface of the body 5 of the keel 4 and the free edge 93 of the fins of the series 91 is less than the distance d2 between the external surface of the body 5 of the keel 4 and the free edge 94 of the fins of the series 92.


This particular geometry makes it possible for the fins of the series 92 to fulfil the primary fixing function, which consists in stable implantation of the component in the glenoid cavity, thanks to their width being greater than those of the fins of the series 91. Thanks to their narrow width, the first fins 91 fulfil the secondary fixing function by virtue of bone growth in the gaps that they delimit.


In a tenth embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 12 and 13 the keel 4 of the glenoid component 2 comprises two series 101 and 102 of fins 6, the series 102 of fins closer to the bearing face SG having surfaces geometrically similar to the bearing surface SG. The series 102 of fins thus has surfaces 103 that may be superposed on the bearing face SG of the glenoid cavity G. This geometry enables these fins to exert forces on the glenoid cavity G in the same direction as the bearing forces exerted by the face SG, which creates increased stability of the fixing of the glenoid component 2.


In an eleventh embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 14 the glenoid component 2 is made up of two elements. One element 112, preferably made of a polymer material and carrying the articulation surface SA, is mounted in a preferably metal shell 114. The metal shell 114 carries the bearing face SG of the socket and forms a part of the body 5 of the keel 4. The metal shell 114 is intended to be implanted in glenoid cavity G of the shoulder and to this end includes fins 6. The shell 114 may equally be made of ceramic and have a partly porous surface.


In order to provide a space for movement of the polymer material element 112, the geometry of the metal shell 114 provides a clearance J11 between the surfaces of contact between the polymer element 112 and the metal shell 114 at the level of an area of the glenoid component 2 situated outside the glenoid cavity G. By authorizing this freedom of movement of the polymer element 112, plastic deformation of that element is prevented and the forces exerted on the component 2 where it is implanted in the glenoid cavity G are reduced, which makes it possible to increase its service life and stability.


In a twelfth embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 15 the body 5 of the keel 4 comprises a flexible sheath 120 surrounding a rod 121 in one piece with the face SG on which the fins 6 are implanted. This elastic sheath 120, which may be made of a polymer material, comprises an end rim 122 adapted to bear on the glenoid cavity G. The part of the flexible sheath 120 intended to be implanted in the glenoid cavity G is elastic so as to be retracted in the relaxed configuration. In this way, the flexible sheath 120 is inserted into the hole P drilled in the glenoid cavity G. The rod 121 is then inserted in the flexible sheath 120, enlarging it in order for its fin or fins 6 to spread apart in the glenoid cavity G to lock the implantation of the glenoid component 2.


To counter the tendency of the flexible sheath 120 to expel the rod 121, having the rod protrude from the flexible sheath 120 and providing on it a shoulder 126 widening the part of the rod projecting from the flexible sheath may be envisaged. In order to block movements in translation of the rod 121 in the flexible sheath 120, this shoulder 126 bears against the end 124 of the flexible sheath anchored in the glenoid cavity G.


The end 8 of the body 5 of the keel 4 carried by the rod 121 advantageously includes at least one hole 128 the function of which is to encourage bone growth in the space created in order to increase the stability of the fixing.


In a variant that is not shown, the glenoid component 2 may include, in addition to the anchor keel 4, an eccentric peg projecting from the face SG and making it possible to improve the fixing of the component in the socket G, in particular blocking its rotation.


Of course, the features of the embodiments shown may be combined with each other in the context of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A shoulder prosthesis glenoid component comprising: an articulation surface that is concave to cooperate with a humeral head;an opposite surface that is opposite to the articulation surface and is configured to mate with a glenoid cavity of a shoulder;a keel protruding from the opposite surface, the keel including a body that extends from the opposite surface at a position that is eccentric relative to an axis passing through a geometrical center of the opposite surface; andat least one internal passage extending between an external surface of the body and an orifice situated on the articulation surface, whereinthe opposite surface extends continuously from the keel to a periphery of the opposite surface, andthe keel further includes at least one fin that is deformable and projecting radially from a portion of a perimeter of the body.
  • 2. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the body of the keel has, in a cross section perpendicular to the axis, a non-circular peripheral contour configured to block rotation of the glenoid component.
  • 3. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the at least one fin has a helicoidal shape and winds around the body.
  • 4. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the at least one fin includes a first surface and a second surface, the first surface between the opposite surface and the second surface, the first and second surfaces extending in a plane substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the body.
  • 5. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the body includes at least two separate cylindrical portions, respective axes of which are parallel to each other and between which the at least one fin extends.
  • 6. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the body includes at least one external peripheral groove and an elastic ring in the at least one external peripheral groove.
  • 7. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the body has a star-shaped cross section including at least three branches.
  • 8. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the at least one fin has a semicircular peripheral contour.
  • 9. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the at least one fin is a first series of parallel fins.
  • 10. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 9, wherein the keel further includes a second series of parallel fins, of width greater than that of the first series of parallel fins and located closer to the opposite surface along a longitudinal main axis of the body than the first series of parallel fins.
  • 11. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 10, wherein the first series of parallel fins or the second series of parallel fins have a shape that is a same shape of the opposite surface.
  • 12. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the articulation surface is carried by an element adapted to be mounted in a metal shell of the component carrying the opposite face and in one piece with the body of the keel.
  • 13. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the body of the keel includes a flexible sheath provided with the at least one fin into which a portion in one piece with the opposite surface is adapted to fit.
  • 14. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the at least one fin is made of polyethylene.
  • 15. The glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the keel includes a cavity between the at least one fin and the opposite surface, the cavity configured to encourage locking of the shoulder prosthesis in the glenoid cavity by bone growth in the cavity.
  • 16. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, further comprising an eccentrically located peg projecting from the opposite surface.
  • 17. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the body of the keel includes a flange configured to prevent rotation of the glenoid component about the axis.
  • 18. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 17, wherein the body of the keel includes at least three contiguous flanges.
  • 19. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 17, wherein the at least one fin projects from the flange.
  • 20. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 18, wherein the at least three contiguous flanges are contiguous at a central portion of the body and spaced apart at the perimeter of the body.
  • 21. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 20, wherein the at least one fin includes a plurality of fins spaced apart along a medial-lateral direction of the body.
  • 22. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 20, wherein the keel includes a concave surface extending between an outer portion of a first flange of the at least three contiguous flanges and an outer portion of a second flange of the at least three contiguous flanges.
  • 23. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid componet according to claim 1, wherein the at least one internal passage open onto the external surface of the body between two successive fins.
  • 24. The shoulder prosthesis glenoid component according to claim 1, wherein the at least one internal passage comprise a network of internal passages.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
1050376 Jan 2010 FR national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/516,211, filed Jan. 25, 2013, which is a national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2010/069585, filed Dec. 14, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/286,286, filed Dec. 14, 2009, which are hereby incorporated in their by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (211)
Number Name Date Kind
3896504 Fischer Jul 1975 A
4725280 Laure Feb 1988 A
4986833 Worland Jan 1991 A
5032132 Matsen, III et al. Jul 1991 A
5033036 Ohmori et al. Jul 1991 A
5080673 Burkhead Jan 1992 A
5108446 Wagner Apr 1992 A
5458637 Hayes Oct 1995 A
5489309 Lackey et al. Feb 1996 A
5489311 Cipolletti Feb 1996 A
5531973 Sarv Jul 1996 A
5662657 Carn Sep 1997 A
5702447 Walch Dec 1997 A
5776202 Copf et al. Jul 1998 A
5800551 Williamson et al. Sep 1998 A
5954722 Bono Sep 1999 A
6102954 Albrektsson et al. Aug 2000 A
6171342 O'Neil et al. Jan 2001 B1
6228119 Ondrla et al. May 2001 B1
6228120 Leonard et al. May 2001 B1
6406495 Schoch Jun 2002 B1
6508841 Martin et al. Jan 2003 B2
6514287 Ondrla et al. Feb 2003 B2
6673115 Resch et al. Jan 2004 B2
6679916 Frankle et al. Jan 2004 B1
6699289 Iannotti et al. Mar 2004 B2
6761740 Tornier Jul 2004 B2
6783549 Stone et al. Aug 2004 B1
6790234 Frankle Sep 2004 B1
6860903 Mears et al. Mar 2005 B2
6911047 Rockwood et al. Jun 2005 B2
6953478 Bouttens et al. Oct 2005 B2
6969406 Tornier Nov 2005 B2
7160328 Rockwood et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169184 Pria Jan 2007 B2
7175663 Stone Feb 2007 B1
7175665 German et al. Feb 2007 B2
7204854 Guederian et al. Apr 2007 B2
7316715 Plaskon Jan 2008 B2
7462197 Tornier Dec 2008 B2
7462199 Justin et al. Dec 2008 B2
7604665 Iannotti et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608109 Dalla Pria Oct 2009 B2
7611539 Bouttens et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621961 Stone Nov 2009 B2
7637928 Fernandez Dec 2009 B2
7648530 Habermeyer et al. Jan 2010 B2
7666522 Justin et al. Feb 2010 B2
7753959 Berelsman et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766969 Justin et al. Aug 2010 B2
7854768 Wiley et al. Dec 2010 B2
7892287 Deffenbaugh Feb 2011 B2
7922769 Deffenbaugh et al. Apr 2011 B2
7927335 Deffenbaugh et al. Apr 2011 B2
7993408 Meridew et al. Aug 2011 B2
8007523 Wagner et al. Aug 2011 B2
8048161 Guederian et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062376 Shultz et al. Nov 2011 B2
8070820 Winslow et al. Dec 2011 B2
8092545 Coon et al. Jan 2012 B2
8206453 Cooney, III et al. Jun 2012 B2
8231683 Lappin et al. Jul 2012 B2
8241365 Williams, Jr. et al. Aug 2012 B2
8287600 Angibaud Oct 2012 B2
8308807 Seebeck et al. Nov 2012 B2
8357201 Mayer et al. Jan 2013 B2
8361157 Bouttens et al. Jan 2013 B2
8425614 Winslow et al. Apr 2013 B2
8444680 Dooney, Jr. et al. May 2013 B2
8449617 McDaniel et al. May 2013 B1
8454702 Smits et al. Jun 2013 B2
8465548 Long Jun 2013 B2
8480750 Long Jul 2013 B2
8532806 Masson Sep 2013 B1
8556902 Ek et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556980 Deffenbaugh Oct 2013 B2
8556981 Jones et al. Oct 2013 B2
8591591 Winslow et al. Nov 2013 B2
8597334 Mocanu Dec 2013 B2
8632597 Lappin Jan 2014 B2
8690951 Baum et al. Apr 2014 B2
8753402 Winslow et al. Jun 2014 B2
8790402 Monaghan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8840676 Belew Sep 2014 B2
8864834 Boileau et al. Oct 2014 B2
8961611 Long Feb 2015 B2
9114017 Lappin Aug 2015 B2
9233003 Roche et al. Jun 2016 B2
9498345 Burkhead et al. Nov 2016 B2
9545311 Courtney, Jr. et al. Jan 2017 B2
9629725 Gargac et al. Apr 2017 B2
10034757 Kovacs et al. Jul 2018 B2
10064734 Burkhead et al. Sep 2018 B2
10251755 Boileau et al. Apr 2019 B2
10342669 Hopkins Jul 2019 B2
10357373 Gargac et al. Jul 2019 B2
10524922 Courtney, Jr. et al. Jan 2020 B2
10722374 Hodorek et al. Jul 2020 B2
20010037153 Rockwood, Jr. Nov 2001 A1
20020095214 Hyde, Jr. Jul 2002 A1
20030055507 McDevitt et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030149485 Tornier Aug 2003 A1
20040030394 Horber Feb 2004 A1
20040059424 Guederian Mar 2004 A1
20040106928 Ek Jun 2004 A1
20040220673 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20040220674 Pria Nov 2004 A1
20050049709 Tornier Mar 2005 A1
20050060039 Cyprien Mar 2005 A1
20050143831 Justin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149044 Justin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050261775 Baum et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278030 Tornier Dec 2005 A1
20060074353 Deffenbaugh et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100714 Ensign May 2006 A1
20060122705 Morgan Jun 2006 A1
20060142865 Hyde, Jr. Jun 2006 A1
20060200248 Beguin et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060200249 Beguin et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070016304 Chudik Jan 2007 A1
20070055380 Berelsman et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070100458 Dalla Pria May 2007 A1
20070142921 Lewis et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156246 Meswania et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179624 Stone et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219638 Jones et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070244563 Roche et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244564 Ferrand Oct 2007 A1
20080183297 Boileau et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080269906 Iannotti et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080294268 Baum et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080306601 Dreyfuss Dec 2008 A1
20090125113 Guederian et al. May 2009 A1
20090149961 Dallmann Jun 2009 A1
20090204225 Meridew et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216332 Splieth et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090281630 Delince et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292364 Linares Nov 2009 A1
20100016975 Iannotti et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100023068 Bouttens et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100049327 Isch et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100087927 Roche et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100161066 Iannotti et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100217399 Groh Aug 2010 A1
20100228352 Courtney et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234959 Roche et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274359 Brunnarius et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100291401 Medina et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100331990 Mroczkowski Dec 2010 A1
20110035013 Winslow et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110118846 Katrana et al. May 2011 A1
20110144760 Wong et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110190899 Pierce et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110282393 Garlach et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120004733 Hodorek et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029647 Winslow et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120130498 Long May 2012 A1
20120165954 Nimal Jun 2012 A1
20120191201 Smits et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120209392 Angibaud et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221112 Lappin Aug 2012 A1
20120232670 Bojarski et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239156 De Wilde et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120253467 Frankle Oct 2012 A1
20120277880 Winslow et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130018483 Li et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130053968 Nardini et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130096631 Leung et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130110470 Vanasse et al. May 2013 A1
20130144393 Mutchler Jun 2013 A1
20130150972 Iannotti et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150973 Splieth et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150975 Iannotti et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130226309 Daigo et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130231754 Daigo et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253656 Long Sep 2013 A1
20130261751 Lappin Oct 2013 A1
20130261752 Lappin et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130264749 Jones et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130282135 Sun et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140025173 Cardon et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140142711 Maroney et al. May 2014 A1
20140194995 Koka Jul 2014 A1
20140257499 Winslow et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277180 Paolino et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140371863 Vanasse et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150073424 Couture et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150094819 Iannotti et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150142122 Bickley et al. May 2015 A1
20150150688 Vanasse et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150272741 Taylor et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150305877 Gargac et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160045323 Kovacs et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160166392 Vanasse et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160270922 Pressacco et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160287401 Muir et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160310285 Kovacs et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160324649 Hodorek et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170027709 Winslow et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170042687 Boileau et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170042690 Burkhead et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170172764 Muir et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170273795 Neichel et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170273801 Hodorek et al. Sep 2017 A1
20180064537 Pressacco et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180078377 Gargac et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180161169 Cardon et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180243102 Burkhead, Jr. et al. Aug 2018 A1
20200030108 Orphanos et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200179126 Courtney, Jr. et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200237519 Ball et al. Jul 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
10123517 Nov 2002 DE
0581667 Feb 1994 EP
0776636 Sep 2000 EP
1323395 Jul 2003 EP
1013246 Oct 2003 EP
1064890 Sep 2005 EP
1488764 Dec 2006 EP
1762201 Mar 2007 EP
1762201 Mar 2007 EP
1515758 Mar 2009 EP
2057970 May 2009 EP
1639966 Sep 2009 EP
1927328 Jan 2011 EP
1902689 Nov 2011 EP
1996125 May 2013 EP
2335655 Jul 2013 EP
1951161 Apr 2014 EP
1973498 Apr 2014 EP
2481376 Apr 2014 EP
2601912 Jul 2016 EP
2567019 Jan 1986 FR
2739151 Mar 1997 FR
2776506 Aug 2000 FR
2955247 Jul 2011 FR
2971144 Aug 2012 FR
2977791 Jul 2014 FR
WO 2011073169 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011150180 Dec 2011 WO
WO 2015068035 May 2015 WO
WO 2015103090 Jul 2015 WO
WO 2017007565 Jan 2017 WO
WO 2019079104 Apr 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (24)
Entry
Cementless Fixation Using a Polyethyene Oseo-Integration Peg as Used on the Freeman-Samuelson Knee brochure, produced by Finsbury Instruments Limited London in conjunction with Adrian Tuke Limited, 1982.
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10155440, dated Aug. 9, 2010, 6 pages.
File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,750, filed Mar. 5, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/EP2010/069585, dated Apr. 11, 2011, 9 pages.
Anatomical Shoulder™ Inverse/Reverse System Surgical Technique, Product Brochure, Zimmer, Inc., published 2006, in 32 pages.
Arthrex, “Arthrex Releases Univers Revers™ Shoulder Arthroplasty System in the United States—First Surgery Successfully Performed in Chillicothe, OH”, Jun. 18, 2013.
Biomet, “Comprehensive® Reverse Shoulder System”, 2013.
Boileau et al., “Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: A prospective, double-blind, randomized study,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Jul./Aug. 2002, vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 351-359.
Boileau et al., “Metal-backed glenoid implant with polyethylene insert is not a viable long-term therapeutic option,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Feb. 2015, pp. 1-10.
Castagna et al., “Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Oct. 2010, vol. 92-B, No. 10, pp. 1410-1415.
Clement et al., “An uncemented metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: factors affecting survival and outcome,” The Japanese Orthopaedic Association, published online Sep. 26, 2012, vol. 18, pp. 22-28.
DJO Surgical, Reverse® shoulder prosthesis Surgical Technique, Feb. 2008.
Eclipse™ Stemless Shoulder Prosthesis, Surgical Technique Guide, Anthrex GmbH, 2014, in 12 pages.
Epoca Shoulder Arthroplasty System, Synthes, Inc., Apr. 2008, in 4 pages.
Epoca Shoulder Arthroplasty System—Stem and Glenoid Technique Guide, Synthes, Inc., Apr. 2008, in 56 pages.
Innovative Design Orthopaedics, “Verso® Shoulder Surgical Technique”, 2013.
Kany et al., “A convertible shoulder system: is it useful in total shoulder arthroplasty revisions?” International Orthopaedics, published online Oct. 16, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 299-304.
Katz et al., “New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases,” published online Oct. 27, 2012, vol. 23, pp. 27-34.
Montoya et al., “Midterm results of a total shoulder prosthesis fixed with a cementless glenoid component,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, May 2013, vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 628-635.
SMR Axioma® TT Metal Back Surgical Technique, Product Brochure, Lima Corporate, dated Sep. 2013, in 48 pages.
Taunton et al., “Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Metal-Backed, Bone-Ingrowth Glenoid Component,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Oct. 2008, vol. 90-A, Issue 10, pp. 2180-2188.
Teissier et al., “The TESS reverse shoulder arthroplasty without a stem in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions: clinical and radiographic results,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Jan. 2015, vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 45-51.
The Anatomical Shoulder™: A true system approach, Product Brochure, Zimmer UK Ltd, printed 2006, in 6 pages.
Univers Revers™ Total Shoulder System, Surgical Technique Guide, Anthrex Inc., Version D, revised Jul. 2, 2015, in 28 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190076261 A1 Mar 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61286286 Dec 2009 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13516211 US
Child 16184670 US