This invention relates generally to arthroplasty and, more particularly to devices and techniques for positioning a prosthesis prior to fixation through the injection of a bonding agent.
In current joint repair situations, it is common practice to prepare host bone stock to receive an implant then, if satisfied with the physical correspondence, apply cement to the host, install the prosthesis, and stabilize the arrangement until curing. This approach has several disadvantages. Foremost among them arises from the unpredictable process of ensuring that, although the prosthesis may have been ideally placed prior to cementation, once the cement is applied, orientation may shift, resulting in a final configuration which is less than optimal.
A few approaches have been attempted to assist in making the positioning of the final implant more predictable. As discussed further in the detailed description herein, one such approach utilizes a centralizing plug inserted distally within the medullary canal, and from which there extends a rod upon which a final implant including a corresponding central bore may be monorailed. The plug and rod are positioned in conjunction with a trial which also includes a central bore, which is then removed, the intramedullary cavity filled with cement and the final implant slid over the rod, displacing the cement as it is pushed down into position. Although this technique may assist in maintaining a side-to-side orientation prior to cementation, it does not address the simultaneous need for up-and-down and/or rotational stabilization. Additionally, as with current techniques, cement is applied to the host prior to the introduction of the final implant, leaving open the possibility that the final implant may be held in a position different from that associated with the trial, and may therefore result in an unacceptable misplacement as the cement cures.
Other approaches do reverse this order, and install the final implant prior to the injection of cement. The known approaches, however, utilize a highly specialized prosthetic device including centralizing protrusions and internal channels through which the cement is introduced. That is, in these systems, the prosthesis itself is used as the cement injector. Due to their requirement for a highly specialized final prosthetic element, such systems are incompatible with currently available implant devices, and therefore raise costs while reducing the options of the practitioner. In addition, they do not adequately address the need for simultaneously stabilizing multiple degrees of freedom prior and during cementation. As a further disadvantage, the systems which use the prosthesis as the cement injector tend to use the cement as a grout between the outer surface of the implant and the inner surface of the receiving cavity. It has been shown, however, that the changes of success are improved through the creation of a thicker cement “mantle,” as opposed to a thin grout-type layer. The need remains, then, for a system whereby the prosthesis may be stabilized relative to multiple degrees of freedom prior to cementation, and, ideally, remain compatible with existing prosthetic components while forming a strong and stable bond to the host.
The present invention resides in apparatus and methods for maintaining the proper positioning of a prosthetic implant having proximal and distal ends within a prepared bone cavity during cement injection and curing. In contrast to prior-art systems the invention provides first stabilization means, implantable within the bone cavity, for minimizing lateral movement of the distal end of the implant, and second stabilization means, physically separate from the means for minimizing lateral movement of the distal end of the implant, for minimizing both the lateral movement of the proximal end of the implant and the rotational movement of the implant overall. In the preferred embodiment, the second stabilization means includes an apertured cap removably securable to the end of a bone having the prepared cavity through which the implant is inserted and held in place. This cap, which may either be entirely rigid or include a pliable membrane in the vicinity of the aperture, preferably further includes a first port associated with cement injection and a second port associated with cement over-pressurization. In an alternative embodiment, the second stabilization means includes a manually operated mechanism enabling the implant to be temporarily yet rigidly secured thereto in accordance with a desired orientation, preferably affording adjustments along multiple degrees of freedom prior to the rigid securement thereof.
Various improvements also exist in the prior art to minimize such adjustment problems. At the very least, as shown in FIG. 6 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,994,085, reproduced herein as
Another approach taken according to the prior art involves the injection of cement after positioning of a specially designed implant into a prepared cavity. The '362 patent referenced above is directed toward such an approach. As with other arrangements of type, the final implant includes a cement canal along its longitudinal axis. A bone-cement injector is threaded onto the proximal portion of this cement canal, causing the cement to subsequently travel down and through the implant, eventually exiting through openings in and around its distal tip. A restrictor plug halts downward cement travel, thus initiating an upward, retrograde filling of the void in between the prosthesis and the cancellous bone wall. In addition to a single distal aperture through which the injected cement is introduced, side ports may also be included, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,274,163 and various other prior-art references.
The methods and associated apparatus just described exhibit various shortcomings. In the technique described with reference to
With respect to the techniques wherein cement is injected after installation, although the implant may be stabilized both proximally and distally as the cement is injected, as with the device of the '085 patent, a specially designed implant including the injector ports must be utilized, resulting in a specialized unit demanding significantly higher cost. Furthermore, regardless of the existing system utilized, attention to the pressure of the cement during injection and curing has not been adequately addressed. Although, for example, the system described in the '163 patent referenced above utilizes various components to maintain pressurization, numerous sophisticated articles are required, including a high pressure nitrogen gas source, disposable cylinder and various associated valves and tubing which may be difficult to assemble, require skilled operators, or create expensive waste and maintenance problems.
The present invention improves upon the prior art by providing a simplified apparatus and associated installation methods whereby an implant may be oriented both proximally and distally prior to the injection of cement, while, at the same time, providing means for guarding against rotational and up/down movement of the implant as well during such injection and subsequent curing. In addition, configurations according to the invention provide a simple means for expelling over-pressurized cement, thereby yielding a simple, but satisfactory indication that sufficient cement has been injected to an acceptable level. Although, in one embodiment, the invention makes advantageous use of a longitudinal bore through the implant, in another embodiment, all of the above improvements and advantages are realized in conjunction with standard, currently available prostheses, thus resulting in an approach which is both straightforward and economical.
Broadly, according to the invention, an apertured proximal sealing cap is installed over the resection portion of the femoral shaft, the prosthesis 310 is inserted through the proximal opening 320 of the seal, and cement is injected through an injection port 322. In a preferred embodiment, this proximal seal includes a horseshoe-shaped collar 330 having one or more means such as thumb screws 332 for releasably securing the collar 330 over the bone, and a preferably pliable gasket 334 made from rubber or other suitable polymeric materials through which the aperture 320 is formed. Also located on and through this gasket 334 is a flap valve 336 wherein the material forming the gasket 334 is adjusted to flap open or rupture at a predetermined pressure level, preferably on the order of 25 mm of mercury, which has shown to be advantageous for such orthopedic purposes. Preferably, this flap valve 336 is formed either by scoring the material of the gasket 334 in a manner conducive to such rupture, or, alternatively, the material may be thinned in this area to break under load.
The embodiment of the proximal seal just described is that preferred for use in conjunction with standard, commercially available implants. That is, the aperture 320 formed in the gasket 334 may take the form of a slit, an oval, or another shape appropriate to the stem of the implant, enabling the device to be inserted therethrough and retained in place by the surrounding material of the gasket 334 against the stem, either through friction or high-tolerance. Alternatively, then, if a more precise geometry of the stem at the point where it emerges through the proximal seal is known, the material 334 may be of a more rigid composition, and may, in fact, be integrally formed to the collar 330, in which case the injection port 322 and valve 336 may be more elaborate and substantial. For example, if the area 334 is metal, the port 322 may be threaded for a more solid connection to commercially available injector nozzles, and the valve 336 may take advantage of more sophisticated pressure-release techniques available in the art, including adjustability for a particular pressure or range of pressures.
Whether the implant is of a standard configuration or specialized for use in conjunction with the invention, a distal spacer 340 is preferably utilized for distal centering. A longitudinal rod 342 may optionally be added to, or installed on the plug 340, requiring a specialized implant having a longitudinal bore 344 akin to that described in the '085 patent referred to above, the exception being that, according to this invention, the implant 310 would be monorailed onto the optional rod 342 prior to the injection of cement into the cavity formed between the walls of the implant and the prepared medullary canal. Thus, as discussed above, the present invention may either be used with a specially prepared implant having this longitudinal bore and/or convenient wall geometries or, alternatively, and unlike the prior art, a standard prosthesis may be used.
In the event that the prosthesis includes an arrangement to assist in installation or removal such as ring 350, the alternative proximal stabilization configuration of
Preferably in this embodiment a set of score marks 526 are also provided on the member 520, such that with the member 520 being moved back and forth to adjust the lateral or transverse positioning of the implant, the fastener 532 may be used to lock the configuration in place, with the marks 526 being used to maintain a visual indication of the desired lateral configuration. Attached to collar 530 is a downwardly extending member 540, which is received by a collar 544 having a manual adjustment device 546. The member 540 may also include markings 542, such that, as the element 540 is moved up and down to adjust for the axial length of the prosthesis, fastener 546 may be locked with the score marks 542 providing a visual indication.
The collar 544 is attached to a clamp 550, which is rigidly attached to the outer surface of the femur through manual fasteners 552 and 554. As a further optional convenience, the collar 544 may be rotationally variable, and locked into place along with member 540 with manual fastener 546, with optional score marks 560 being used as a visual indication of this configuration, if so desired.
Although the various embodiments of this invention may be used to properly position a trial implant prior to the positioning of a final prosthetic element, it should be apparent that in all cases, the device such as 504 in
For example, referring to the embodiment of
This is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/091,846, filed Mar. 6, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,821,300 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/396,576, filed Sep. 15, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,379,391, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/029,457, filed Mar. 5, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,267,785, which is a U.S. national phase application of Patent Cooperation Treaty application Ser. No. US97/01754, filed Jan. 31, 1997, which claims priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/595,277, filed Feb. 2, 1996, now abandoned. The entire contents of each application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3067740 | Haboush | Dec 1962 | A |
4030143 | Elloy et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4274163 | Malcom et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4337773 | Raftopoulos et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4357716 | Brown | Nov 1982 | A |
4404692 | Eftekhar | Sep 1983 | A |
4501263 | Harbuck | Feb 1985 | A |
4560374 | Hammerslag | Dec 1985 | A |
4577631 | Kreamer | Mar 1986 | A |
4641653 | Rockey | Feb 1987 | A |
4686973 | Frisch | Aug 1987 | A |
4697584 | Haynes | Oct 1987 | A |
4815454 | Dozier, Jr. | Mar 1989 | A |
4896662 | Noble | Jan 1990 | A |
4959066 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4983183 | Horowitz | Jan 1991 | A |
4994071 | MacGregor | Feb 1991 | A |
4994085 | Sawai et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5002581 | Paxson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5047050 | Arpesani | Sep 1991 | A |
5047061 | Brown | Sep 1991 | A |
5078746 | Garner | Jan 1992 | A |
5080680 | Mikhail et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5090959 | Samson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092892 | Ashby | Mar 1992 | A |
5207695 | Trout, III | May 1993 | A |
5219355 | Parodi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275622 | Lazarus et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5340362 | Carbone | Aug 1994 | A |
5360443 | Barone et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5387235 | Chuter | Feb 1995 | A |
5456717 | Zweymuller et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5501687 | Willert et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507831 | Burke | Apr 1996 | A |
5554192 | Crowninshield | Sep 1996 | A |
5578072 | Barone | Nov 1996 | A |
5628783 | Quiachon | May 1997 | A |
5658350 | Carbone | Aug 1997 | A |
5658351 | Dudasik et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683472 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5746771 | Clement, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5766261 | Neal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766262 | Mikhail | Jun 1998 | A |
5910171 | Kummer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5910172 | Penenberg | Jun 1999 | A |
5951606 | Burke | Sep 1999 | A |
6010535 | Shah | Jan 2000 | A |
6102953 | Huebner | Aug 2000 | A |
6126691 | Kasra et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174335 | Varieur et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6251141 | Pierson, III et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267785 | Masini | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6371991 | Manasas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379391 | Masini | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6821300 | Masini | Nov 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050090832 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10091846 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10996415 | US | |
Parent | 09396576 | Sep 1999 | US |
Child | 10091846 | US | |
Parent | 09029457 | US | |
Child | 09396576 | US |