Various embodiments relate to shower rod mounting assemblies.
Conventional shower rod assemblies for supporting a shower curtain are mounted to a pair of support surfaces with fasteners. Mechanical fasteners damage the support surfaces during installation. Further damage may be caused during removal, particularly if an excessive load is inadvertently applied to the shower rod assembly. The mechanical fasteners provide limited flexibility. If inadvertently installed incorrectly, movement of the shower rod assembly to another location results in exposed holes formed in the support surface, which may include tiles that are difficult and costly to repair.
Adhesive mount shower rod assemblies use traditional pressure sensitive adhesives which typically contain both a foam layer and an adhesive layer in order to conform to the surface of interest. These assemblies use substantially rigid flanges or mounting plates such as zinc die-cast, stamped steel or injection molded plastic. Once installed these systems are difficult to remove. Additionally, the adhesive leaves behind a significant amount of adhesive residue and foam, requiring harsh chemicals to clean the surface.
Length adjustable or telescopic shower rods are known in the industry. Some are mounted into mounting assemblies with fasteners described above. Some are provided with elastomeric fittings at each end for contacting the support surfaces. The adjustable shower rods are expanded to engage the support surfaces such that the shower rod is in compression to employ friction for maintaining the installation of the shower rod. The compression of the shower rod may be provided by a threaded engagement between concentric rods, a spring or the like. Such adjustable shower rods, may become inadvertently uninstalled due to exposure to steam that may reduce friction at the mounting surface, or fatigue of the spring over time.
According to at least one embodiment, a shower rod mounting assembly is provided with a flexible substrate having a first side and a spaced apart second side. A reversible dry adhesive layer at least partially covers the first side of the substrate to attach the flexible substrate to a surface and leave the underlying surface unmarked after removal. The reversible adhesive retains an adhesion property for a plurality of adhesion cycles. A receptacle is mounted to the second side and is adapted to receive an end of a shower rod.
According to at least another embodiment, a shower rod mounting assembly is provided with a substrate having a first side and a spaced apart second side. An adhesive layer at least partially covers the first side of the substrate to attach the flexible substrate to a surface. A boss extends from the substrate with a track formed therein with an opening to receive an end of a shower rod. A biasing member extends from the substrate adjacent to the opening to retain the end of the shower rod after installation.
According to at least another embodiment, a method for installing a shower rod assembly provides a pair of flexible substrates, each with a receptacle. The pair of flexible substrates is adhered to opposing surfaces with a reversible dry adhesive that retains an adhesion property for a plurality of adhesion cycles. A shower rod is installed into the pair of receptacles.
According to at least another embodiment, a shower rod assembly is provided with a length adjustable rod and a pair of shower rod mounting assemblies. Each shower rod mounting assembly is provided with a flexible substrate having a first side and a spaced apart second side. A reversible dry adhesive layer at least partially covers the first side of the substrate to attach the flexible substrate to a surface and leave the underlying surface unmarked after removal. The reversible adhesive retains an adhesion property for a plurality of adhesion cycles. A receptacle is mounted to the second side and is adapted to receive an end of a shower rod.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
Surfaces found in bath enclosures are typically flat, non-porous and smooth but imperfect on a microscopic level. These characteristics are common for various materials and the associated methods of manufacture, such as plate glass, fiberglass, plastic or tile. With that understanding, a flexible adhesive may be used to attach a mounting plate to effectively conform to and adhere to the mounting surface. Such flexibility enables maximum adhesion by eliminating random air pockets which would be present if a more rigid adhesive material were to be used. A majority of the mounting plate system can be flexible so that the contact surface can be subjected to a peel away force in an occurrence of relocating the mounting plate location. In addition, to prevent self-delamination in actual use, the applied forces can be transferred to the adhesive layer so that the forces are in shear.
Dry adhesives, which are reversible and reusable, are part of many recent advancements being made in temporary adhesive technologies. These adhesives bond well to smooth non-porous surfaces and are very strong in shear yet have weak bonding in peel. These adhesives represent a synthetic bio-mimicry approach to replicate adhesion performance characteristics of Gecko setae. These dry adhesives can be embodied by an adhesive pad that can be peeled away from the mounting surface without any glue residue remaining on the surface. Additionally, the adhesive pad can then be repeatedly repositioned without a measurable loss in shear performance. Adapting products to these technologies presents technical challenges in design and engineering that ensures a proper aesthetic while keeping application of loads in a shear direction. Therefore, a suitable embodiment minimizes total forces in the peel direction.
With reference to
The mounting assembly 20 also includes a mounting plate 30 with a receptacle 32 to receive an end of a shower rod. The flexible adhesive layer 28 makes contact with the mounting surface. The thin, flexible pad 22 bonds the adhesive layer 28 to a base 34 of the mounting plate 30. A release paper 36 is provided upon the adhesive layer 28 to protect the adhesive during storage and transportation; and for removal during installation to expose the adhesive layer 28. The mounting plate 30 is formed from a suitable material for providing the receptacle 32 and supporting the shower rod, such as a structural plastic or a metallic material. Such materials may not be sufficiently deformable to peel the adhesive layer 28 so the base 34 of the mounting plate 30 and the adhesive layer 28 are separated by the flexible pad 22. Any suitable adhesive may be employed for securing the base 34 of the mounting plate 30 to the pad 22. According to one embodiment, the mounting plate 30 may be formed from a clear or translucent material, such as (PC) Polycarbonate. An ultraviolet (UV) curable adhesive may be employed to speed assembly in manufacturing due to a reduced cure time of such adhesives. PC has a high level of transparency that allows UV curable adhesives to cure directly through the mounting plate 30.
Any suitable adhesive may be selected to allow maximum conformance to the substrate mounting surface on the wall side 24 that has sufficient flexibility to peel the pad 22 for removal of the mounting plate from the surface with minimal effort and without residue. The pad 22 can therefore be made from any number of materials which can be bonded to both the adhesive layer 28 and the mounting plate 30. The pad 22 can therefore be formed from a thin sheet of a thermoplastic polymer, such as polycarbonate (PC), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), biaxially-oriented polyethylene terephthalate (BoPet), or the like. Alternatively, the pad 22 may be formed from vinyl, cloth or the like.
The adhesive layer 28 can be made from a reversible adhesive material. The reversible adhesive material may be a block copolymer. The reversible adhesive material may have material properties that provide for a shear strength that is higher than a peel strength when in use. For example, the dynamic shear strength may be one to five pounds per inch width, and the peel strength may be 0.01 to 0.05 pounds per inch width (or may be 20 to 500 times greater, etc.). This allows the mounting plate 30 to remain affixed to an underlying surface such as a vertical wall, while making the mounting plate 30 easy to remove by the user.
The adhesive layer 28 may be a thermoplastic elastomer, such as a styrene thermoplastic elastomer. For example, the adhesive layer 28 may include a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), thermoplastic rubber (TPR), a styrene-butadiene styrene (SBS) block copolymer, or the like. According to one embodiment, the adhesive layer 28 includes the following compositions or composition ranges by weight: 100 parts styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene (SEBS) block co-polymer, 100-300 parts hydrogenated naphthenic oil, 100-300 parts white oil, 0-10 parts petroleum adhesion promoter resin, 1-5 parts polypropylene resin, 2-10 parts assistant agent. In one embodiment, the adhesive layer may be a G or D series product from Kraton Company, or a YH series product from Balin Huaxing Petrochemical Ltd. in Yueyang China. In another embodiment, the adhesive layer may be from Ren-River Rubber Products as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/390,689 by Wang filed on Feb. 15, 2012 and incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. The reversible adhesive may also be an adhesive material as described in International Application No. PCT/US2011/057309 by Crosby et al. filed Oct. 21, 2011 and incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Other suitable reversible adhesives are also contemplated for use with the mounting plate 30.
Referring to
The base 34 of the mounting plate 30 is formed as an annular ring according to an embodiment. A portion of the annular ring is angled away from the pad 22 to provide a beam 52 adjacent to the primary slot 44. The extension of the beam 52 away from the pad 22 reduces contact area between the base 34 and the pad 22 adjacent to the track 40. The mounting plate 30 may be formed from a material with a large range of elastic deformation so that the beam 52 provides a biasing member or spring for retention of the end of the shower rod, such as serving as a containment strap.
The track 40 is formed to a blind depth to provide a support surface 54 (
Referring now to
During assembly, the beam 52 is slightly compressed to permit the head 87 to enter the primary slot 44. Once fully installed the beam 52 returns over the end fitting 82 and prevents the end fitting from movement perpendicular to the center axis of the shower rod 62. Therefore, the beam 52 retains the shower rod 62 assembled to the shower rod mounting assembly 20.
A substantially flexible shower rod mounting assembly 20 exerts applied forces in shear while being flexible enough to peel the pad 22 away when movement is required. In the proposed design ninety percent of the contact surface area 58 between the base 34 and the pad 22 is located below the centroid 56 or center axis of the shower rod 62. Alternatively, more than fifty percent of this contact surface area 58 should be oriented below the centroid 56 in order to maintain the loading on the adhesive layer 28 in shear. In order for the shower rod mounting system 20 to be flexible to facilitate manual peeling of the pad 22 and the adhesive layer, a surface area of the pad 22 is greater than the contact surface area 58. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the contact surface area 58 is ten percent of the total area of the pad 22. Alternatively, the contact surface area 58 is less than half of the total area of the pad 22.
The end fittings 82 and the mounting plate 30 contain geometry to transfer loading to the pad 22 and the wall surface by the tapered or angled surfaces of the chamfer 90 and the support surface 54. Of course, other geometries can achieve this function, such as an orb mating with an angled surface as one example.
The proposed shower rod mounting assembly 20 provides a solution for installation of a shower curtain rod assembly 60 within a bath or shower enclosure area without drilling holes in the support surface. This solution eliminates drilling into non-porous surfaces which may result in costly repairs if performed or positioned incorrectly.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
264947 | Heyl | Sep 1882 | A |
353505 | Rollins | Nov 1886 | A |
805570 | Maldaner | Nov 1905 | A |
905142 | Bond | Dec 1908 | A |
1556733 | Talbot | Oct 1925 | A |
3098272 | Frye | Jul 1963 | A |
3300164 | Welles | Jan 1967 | A |
3595511 | Summerville, Jr. | Jul 1971 | A |
4088174 | Edwards | May 1978 | A |
4101104 | Minard | Jul 1978 | A |
4270720 | Fukuchi | Jun 1981 | A |
4671482 | Shapiro | Jun 1987 | A |
4924071 | Jacobs | May 1990 | A |
4967740 | Riedel | Nov 1990 | A |
5149741 | Alper et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5275367 | Frye | Jan 1994 | A |
5409189 | Lühmann | Apr 1995 | A |
5507464 | Hamerski et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516581 | Kreckel et al. | May 1996 | A |
5672402 | Kreckel et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5755913 | Liaw et al. | May 1998 | A |
5921514 | Schumann | Jul 1999 | A |
5989708 | Kreckel | Nov 1999 | A |
6001471 | Bries et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6106937 | Hamerski | Aug 2000 | A |
6120867 | Hamerski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131864 | Schumann | Oct 2000 | A |
6162534 | Hamerski | Dec 2000 | A |
6406781 | Hamerski | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6499707 | Hamerski et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6527900 | Kreckel et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6694543 | Moore | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6835452 | Hamerski | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6845955 | Hsu | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7207543 | Ortwein | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7575208 | Lan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7762508 | Xu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8043459 | Xie et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043460 | Xie et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8069508 | O'Connell | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8080198 | Verhaert et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8231755 | Xie et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251163 | Xie et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8377542 | Xie et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8806670 | O'Connell | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020009568 | Bries et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017359 | Luhmann | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020790 | Hamerski et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020114911 | Franck et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132115 | Hamerski et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188057 | Chen | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030049439 | Johansson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030134112 | Kreckel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030168165 | Hatfield | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030211317 | Sheridan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232190 | O'Leary et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005454 | Full et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046094 | Lan | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086710 | Pitzen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092663 | Krawinkel | May 2004 | A1 |
20040178310 | Marion | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188580 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050013996 | Hatfield | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050268394 | Monk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060068144 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060142447 | Hatfield | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185072 | Dyckow | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070003758 | Jin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070006377 | Moore | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070102601 | Thompson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104395 | Kinigakis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169260 | Huang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070254127 | Lin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257165 | Newbould et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289786 | Cutkosky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022451 | Urlich et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026213 | Lan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080135159 | Bries et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080257486 | Xie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262188 | Xie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280086 | Sheridan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090051257 | Picken et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090090461 | Xie et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090145539 | Kreckel et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090229732 | Determan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254057 | Ceusters et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090280330 | Xie et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100021647 | Sitti et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100038502 | Lan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100221496 | de Jong | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252177 | Sargent et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100252709 | Weng | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262103 | Turner et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110020640 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031198 | Trettin | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110113547 | O'Connell | May 2011 | A1 |
20120028040 | Kai et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120032043 | McGreevy et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036628 | O'Connell | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120070659 | Nakagawa et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120145847 | Wang | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120153102 | Thompson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120202035 | Xie et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216949 | Carey Stachowski et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120306188 | Chen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308763 | Chen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130181102 | Tooley et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198949 | Hai | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140034246 | Kenney et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140069578 | Xie et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2845629 | Dec 2006 | CN |
1002846 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1051450 | May 2004 | EP |
1440989 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1440989 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1141158 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1710287 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1710287 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2001104118 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002501107 | Jan 2002 | JP |
M380071 | May 2010 | TW |
2008028120 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2012078249 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012078249 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012120268 | Sep 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150096117 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |