1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system to be installed at an interior of a building wall to contain shrapnel from a blast, and a method for producing such systems.
2. Description of Related Art
In the aftermath of recent terrorist attacks, in which buildings have been targeted for destruction, increased attention has been paid to improving the safety of workers inside such buildings, should further attacks be forthcoming. It has been determined that a main source of damage to articles and injury to persons inside of a building under attack is not necessarily the initial blast of an impact or explosion against the building, but instead is the flying shrapnel (pieces of the building wall) generated by the blast.
It has been determined that improvements in containing this shrapnel can be accomplished by spraying a polymeric liner onto the interior surface of the structural wall of a building. A polymer proposed for this application is a polyurethane material that is sprayed directly onto an interior surface of the structural wall. In existing buildings, this liner would be applied by removing any interior cosmetic wall surface (e.g., drywall), applying the spray coating, and reinstalling the cosmetic wall surface. In new buildings, the liner would be sprayed onto the interior of the structural wall prior to the interior finish work being performed.
The in situ spraying of such a liner is a relatively expensive process, and requires skilled equipment operators and careful containment of the area in which the spraying is being performed. In addition, the polyurethane material has a very rapid set or cure time, on the order of only a few seconds. Thus, when the polyurethane is inadvertently sprayed onto surfaces which are not intended to have a liner thereon, it can be very difficult to remove the material from such surfaces.
Polyurea coating materials are generally known for use in applications where corrosion resistance or abrasion resistance is needed or desired, or in certain waterproofing applications. Certain polyurea coatings also are tear and impact resistant.
It is accordingly a principal object of the present invention to provide a system which improves the safety of a building by providing shrapnel absorption and containment, and which provides improved containment of shrapnel generated from an impact or blast at the wall of a building.
The above and other objects of the present invention are achieved by producing pre-formed panels which are cut to size, as necessary, and installed onto the interior surface of a structural wall of a building. The panels are produced by spraying a polyurea or other elastomeric material specifically selected to facilitate the production process and the performance of the finished panels, in producing a material having improved elongation and tensile strength properties. Alternatively, the polyurea material or other elastomeric material may be applied and bonded directly to the interior surface of a structural wall or building.
elastomers such as polysiloxane, polyurethane and polyurea/polyurethane hybrids may be employed as an alternative to polyurea in constructing the panels or in bonding a layer or layers of the material directly to the wall.
The present invention also involves a method for producing shock-resistant panels, including spraying a two-part, high solids, polyurea elastomer material onto a releaseable substrate to a desired thickness, with or without fiber or fabric reinforcement, then allowing the material to cure, and removing the cured panel from the substrate. Panels are then delivered to a building site, and are installed at the interior of the structural walls of the building.
The invention will be best understood by reading the ensuing specification in conjunction with the drawing figures, in which like elements are designated by like reference numerals, and wherein:
As illustrated in
Employing standard, known, spray application equipment, a two-part, high solids, elastomer composition is sprayed in liquid (uncured) form onto substrate 10. The spray equipment, for illustrative purposes, may include spray nozzle 20, which is connected via flexible tubing 22, to an application pump 24. Reservoir or storage tank 26 may be used to feed the components making up the elastomer composition through feed lines 28, 30, where the components are mixed at valve 32. Spray nozzle 20 may either be manually operated so as to apply the polyurea material over the entire substrate in producing a panel. Alternatively, the spray nozzle (more than one can be used may be mounted to a carriage (not shown) of a known construction that has drive means for moving the nozzle 20 transversely or horizontally, and vertically, to ensure that the composition is applied in an even thickness over the entire substrate. Other spray application arrangements are also feasible, and the one shown in
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the panels may further be enhanced by including a reinforcing layer 102 which may be disposed at either the outer or inner surface of the panel 100, or which may be disposed in the interior of the panel. The method of producing such a panel, with the reinforcing layer being at an interior of the panel, may preferably include placing a reinforcing fabric material against substrate 10, and spraying the polyurea or other sprayable elastomer onto the fabric to a thickness which is approximately one-half the thickness of the finished panel. The fabric 102 with the sprayed-on polyurea is then rotated or flipped such that the polyurea faces the substrate and the fabric 102 faces the spray equipment. A second application or spraying of the polyurea onto the opposite side of the fabric 102 is then effected, to produce a panel of the desired final or finished thickness.
Modifications to this preferred process sequence may be employed. The reinforcing layer can be placed in intimate contact with substrate 10 when it is desired to have the layer at an exterior surface of the panel 100, and the elastomer can be sprayed onto the layer until the desired panel thickness is attained. Where the layer 102 is to be in the interior of the panel 100, the layer may be spaced apart from the substrate 10, with the polyurea being sprayed through the layer to encapsulate the layer 102. Alternatively, a portion of the panel may be sprayed onto the substrate, and the layer 102 is then introduced, and the remaining thickness of the panel is then sprayed to complete the panel.
Once the spray process is completed, and the polyurea material has either partially or fully cured, the layer is separated from the substrate 10, and thus forms a panel 100.
The panels 100 may thus be essentially mass-produced in an economical manner. This can be accomplished in a true factory setting, or in a portable or makeshift production facility constructed at a building site, if that were found to be comparably economical or desirable for any reason. Panels 100 are then transported to a building which is to be outfitted with these blast-resistant panels.
Interior structural walls 104 of a building to which the panels are to be secured are either left exposed during initial construction or, in a building retrofit, the cosmetic interior wall surfaces are removed to expose the interior surface of the structural wall. The panels 100 are cut to size, as necessary, and are affixed to the interior surface of the wall 104, preferably using any suitable adhesive, or by mechanical attachment. Because the structural wall 104 will commonly be formed either of block or poured concrete, suitable mechanical forms of attachment may include threaded concrete wall anchors, or screw and anchor sets, or nailing with an appropriate concrete-penetrating nail.
An explosive blast, or other type of impact force at the exterior of a building, can cause the structural wall to fracture and generate wall fragments of varying sizes, which are generally referred to as shrapnel. The panels 100, with their improved elongation and tensile strength characteristics, will act to effectively absorb a significant portion of the kinetic energy imparted to the pieces of shrapnel. This absorption of kinetic energy will prevent the shrapnel from flying through the interior of the building. In situations in which the explosive blast also causes the panels 100 to fracture, the kinetic energy absorbed or dissipated by the panels will significantly reduce the amount and/or speed of the shrapnel that may enter the interior of the building. Persons inside the building are thus better protected against a principal cause of injury resulting from an attack on a building.
The panels are also believed to contribute to the structural integrity of the wall itself, particularly when fastened to the wall by mechanical fasteners at the periphery of the panels.
In order to be effective at absorbing or dissipating the potentially high levels of kinetic energy that may come from an explosion or other concussive event, it is preferred that the panel thickness be in the range of about 100 to about 250 mil. Even more preferably, the panel thickness will be about 180 mil. Panels thicker than 250 mil may also be used, however, it is expected that the possible incremental increase in shrapnel containment or blast resistance afforded by the thicker panels may be outweighed by the increased cost (material cost), in a cost/benefit analysis.
The elastomeric material employed in the shrapnel-containing panels preferably has particular combinations of physical or other material properties in its cured state. Of particular significance are percent elongation at break and tensile strength. The elastomer preferably will have an elongation at break in a range between about 100-800%, and more preferably at the higher end of this range, e.g., 400-800%. The tensile strength of the elastomer is preferably a minimum of 2000 psi.
In addition, the adhesion properties of the elastomer are believed to be important, whether the panels are constructed separately or are formed in place on the walls of the building or other structure to be protected. It is preferred that the elastomer exhibit an adhesion to concrete of 300 psi minimum (or at concrete failure), and an adhesion to steel of 1200 psi minimum.
As noted previously, polyurea, polysiloxane, polyurethane and polyurea/polyurethane hybrids can produce the desired physical and material properties. Currently, a particularly preferred elastomer is marketed as Envirolastic® AR425, a 100% solids, spray-applied, aromatic polyurea material, marketed by the General Polymers division of Sherwin-Williams Company. This material is available as a two-part (isocyanate quasi-polymer; amine mixture with pigment), sprayable material designed principally as a flexible, impact resistant, waterproof coating and lining system.
The Envirolastic® AR425 system has been tested in panels produced having a fabric reinforcement layer. The fabric reinforcement layer provides a framework to which the uncured elastomer will adhere in forming a panel shape. The fabric reinforcement will preferably also contribute to the structural integrity of the panel in resisting blast and in containing shrapnel, particularly in helping restrict the amount of elongation experienced by the elastomer as the energy of the blast or other impact is being absorbed.
To date, the fabrics that have been used in producing panels for testing are produced from aramid or polyester yarns or fibers, with an open grid (opening between warp and fill yarns) on the order of 0.25 in. by 0.25 in., or 0.5 in. by 0.25 in. Smaller or larger grid opening sizes are, however, believed to be suitable for use. The tensile strength of the fabric employed in panels tested to date is on the order of 1200 psi by 1200 psi. Fabric made from Technora and Twaron-brand aramid yarns or fibers produced by Teijin Fibers are believed to be particularly suitable for use in this application.
The shrapnel containment system and method of the present invention can also be in the form of a layer of the elastomeric material applied and bonded directly to the wall or other structure that is to be reinforced. In this instance, the wall would preferably be cleared of loose and foreign materials, with the elastomer applied by spraying, in a manner similar to that employed in spraying the panels onto the panel substrate. The elastomer, as noted above, will preferably be selected to have a bonding strength or adhesion to concrete of 300 psi minimum, and the concrete will generally have a sufficient number of small surface irregularities such that the elastomer will find regions where mechanical attachment enhances the adhesion.
When the system is to have a fabric or fiber reinforcing element, the elastomer may also preferably be partially applied, with the reinforcing element then being positioned, and the remainder of the elastomer layer is then spray-applied. Alternatively, the reinforcing element could first be positioned against the wall, with the entire thickness of the elastomer layer then being applied thereto.
Testing of blast-resistant/shrapnel-containment panels in accordance with the present invention have been conducted. The physical test layout (not to scale) is shown in a schematic overhead view in
Panels A, B, and C (thickness not to scale relative to wall thickness) were installed at the interior of three of the walls, while the fourth wall had no panel or lining installed. The panels included stainless steel channels 120 surrounding their peripheries, and were secured to the interior of the walls 202 using concrete anchor fasteners.
All of Panels A, B and C were produced at a nominal thickness of 180 mil of polyurea material (Envirolastic® AR425) having a fabric reinforcement layer disposed therein. Further constructional details of the panels are as follows:
The explosive charge 200 comprised 42 blocks (52.5 lbs.) of C-4 explosive configured to generate a uniform blast overpressure on the face of each target wall 202. This quantity of C-4 explosive is equivalent to 67.2 pounds of TNT. The charge was elevated four feet above the ground to align it with the center point of each wall (walls 202 were 8 feet in height). The explosive charge was statically detonated, creating a peak incident overpressure of 17.67 psi, and a reflected pressure of 51.22 psi.
Initial post-explosion observations revealed that the unprotected wall (no panel secured to interior) suffered catastrophic structural failure, with virtually none of the concrete of either the target wall 202 or the reinforcing legs 204 remaining in place above the base of the wall. Fragments of the wall, or shrapnel, caused by the blast were found up to 54 feet behind the wall (i.e., to the interior of the wall).
In contrast, the three target walls having the panels installed at the interior surface remained standing, with somewhat varying levels of damage to the concrete blocks. Regions at which the target wall 202 was joined to reinforcing legs 204 appeared to suffer the most damage, due to the stresses induced at those joints by the blast. The target walls themselves contained varying degrees of cracking and fracture.
Inspection of the panels revealed that small areas of a marking paint coating on the interior surfaces of the panel had spalled or been knocked, off, presumably by concrete fragments impacting the opposite side of the panel during the explosion. Little or no plastic deformation, and no fracture or perforation, of the panels was observed. No concrete fragments were found behind (to the interior of) the panels.
Upon removal of the panels, fragments of the target walls were found behind each of the test panels. Tables 2-5 present data relating to wall fragments (shrapnel) found subsequent to the test. It is to be noted that no data is provided relative to “Distance from Wall” for the walls having the panels secured thereto, in that none of the fragments passed through the panels.
It can thus be seen that the present invention provides an economical means of greatly enhancing the safety of workers and/or equipment or other objects located inside a building or other structure which is subjected to an explosive blast or other form of large impact, which would otherwise send shrapnel of pieces of the wall projecting through the interior of the structure. The system of the present invention can readily be retrofitted into existing buildings and structures, especially when the pre-sprayed panel version is employed, or can be installed in any new building or structure being constructed. The finished interior wall may have an appearance substantially identical to an interior wall not outfitted with the system of the present invention, and thereby no compromise is made with regard to workplace aesthetics.
While principally disclosed as being useful in shielding the interior of a wall and containing shrapnel therefrom in the event of a blast or other impact, the system and method of the present invention, particularly the system in panel form, is believed to provide high levels of resistance to penetration therethrough in more focused or localized impact situations. As such, the panels or the system are expected to be suitable for use as armor “plate” in applications that require energy absorption and resistance to penetration against, for example, generally smaller projectiles fired by rifles and other firearms and guns, including use in defeating or defending against projectiles that are designed to be “armor-piercing” in nature. This property is regarded herein as being encompassed by the terms, “blast resistant”, and as used for “shrapnel containment”, as those terms are employed herein.
The foregoing description has been provided for illustrative purposes. Variations and modifications to the embodiments described herein may become apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art upon studying this disclosure, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/510,691, filed Oct. 8, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,316,613, entitled “Shrapnel Containment System and Method for Producing Same,” which is a U.S. National Phase Application of International Application No. PCT/US2004/010488, filed Apr. 6, 2004, entitled “Shrapnel Containment System and Method for Producing Same,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/460,422, filed Apr. 7, 2003, entitled “Blast-Resistant Panel and Method for Producing Same.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
230228 | Boyd | Jul 1880 | A |
1444405 | Wagemaker | Feb 1923 | A |
1871571 | Weber | Aug 1932 | A |
1990656 | Kotrbaty | Feb 1935 | A |
2104872 | Levy | Jan 1938 | A |
2235001 | Allen | Mar 1941 | A |
2718829 | Seymour et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
2806277 | Hand et al. | Sep 1957 | A |
3029172 | Glass | Apr 1962 | A |
3235039 | O'Donnell | Feb 1966 | A |
3444033 | King | May 1969 | A |
3522140 | Hartzell | Jul 1970 | A |
3648613 | Cunn | Mar 1972 | A |
3648615 | Wilkaitis | Mar 1972 | A |
3649324 | Payne | Mar 1972 | A |
3703201 | Musyt et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3736715 | Krumwiede | Jun 1973 | A |
3801416 | Gulbierz | Apr 1974 | A |
3866242 | Slagel | Feb 1975 | A |
3962976 | Kelsey | Jun 1976 | A |
4062347 | Jensen | Dec 1977 | A |
4104842 | Rockstead et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4125984 | Jonas | Nov 1978 | A |
4139591 | Jurisich | Feb 1979 | A |
4175357 | Goldhaber | Nov 1979 | A |
4185437 | Robinson | Jan 1980 | A |
4226071 | Bennett | Oct 1980 | A |
4253288 | Chun | Mar 1981 | A |
4269004 | Schiebroek | May 1981 | A |
4297820 | Artzer | Nov 1981 | A |
4416096 | Schuster et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4478895 | Makami et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4494348 | Kastelic | Jan 1985 | A |
4498941 | Goldsworthy | Feb 1985 | A |
4505208 | Goldman | Mar 1985 | A |
4558552 | Reitter, II | Dec 1985 | A |
4562666 | Young, III | Jan 1986 | A |
4616456 | Parker | Oct 1986 | A |
4625484 | Oboler | Dec 1986 | A |
4628661 | St. Louis | Dec 1986 | A |
4640074 | Paakkinen | Feb 1987 | A |
4646498 | Schneller et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4664967 | Tasdemiroglu | May 1987 | A |
4730023 | Sato et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4731972 | Anderson | Mar 1988 | A |
4732803 | Smith, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4780351 | Czempoyesh | Oct 1988 | A |
4822657 | Simpson | Apr 1989 | A |
4842923 | Hartman | Jun 1989 | A |
4877656 | Baskin | Oct 1989 | A |
4911062 | Heyman | Mar 1990 | A |
4970838 | Phillips | Nov 1990 | A |
5032466 | Cappa | Jul 1991 | A |
5037690 | van der Kooy | Aug 1991 | A |
5076168 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5104726 | Ross | Apr 1992 | A |
5124195 | Harpell et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5190802 | Pilato | Mar 1993 | A |
5200256 | Dunbar | Apr 1993 | A |
5242207 | Carson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249534 | Sacks | Oct 1993 | A |
5316839 | Kato et al. | May 1994 | A |
5347775 | Santos | Sep 1994 | A |
5402703 | Drotleff | Apr 1995 | A |
5447765 | Crane | Sep 1995 | A |
5463929 | Mejia | Nov 1995 | A |
5480955 | Primeaux, II | Jan 1996 | A |
5487248 | Artzer | Jan 1996 | A |
5517894 | Bohne et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522194 | Graulich | Jun 1996 | A |
5524412 | Corl | Jun 1996 | A |
5563364 | Alhamad | Oct 1996 | A |
5576511 | Alhamad | Nov 1996 | A |
5582906 | Romesberg et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591933 | Li et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5647180 | Billings et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649398 | Isley, Jr. et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655343 | Seals | Aug 1997 | A |
5681408 | Pate et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681612 | Benedict et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5744221 | Crane et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749178 | Garmong | May 1998 | A |
5761864 | Nonoshita | Jun 1998 | A |
5789327 | Rousseau | Aug 1998 | A |
5811719 | Madden, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813174 | Waller | Sep 1998 | A |
5822940 | Carlin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833782 | Crane et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5937595 | Miller | Aug 1999 | A |
5962617 | Slagel | Oct 1999 | A |
6012260 | Hendrick et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034155 | Espeland et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6099768 | Strickland et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112489 | Zweig | Sep 2000 | A |
6161462 | Michaelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6176920 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212840 | Davidovitz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269597 | Haas | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298607 | Mostaghel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298766 | Mor | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298882 | Hayes et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309732 | Lopez-Anido et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314858 | Strasser et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6439120 | Bureaux et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6455131 | Lopez-Anido et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6460304 | Kim | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469304 | Hewitt et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6503855 | Menzies et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6524679 | Hauber et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543371 | Gardner | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548430 | Howland | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6703104 | Neal | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718722 | Worrell et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745535 | Nordgren et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6806212 | Fyfe | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820381 | Ballough | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6898907 | Diamond | May 2005 | B2 |
6899009 | Christiansen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907811 | White | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6927183 | Christen | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7067592 | Chino et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7138175 | Saito | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148313 | Koga et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7189456 | King | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7886651 | Hall | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8316613 | Hall | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20020058450 | Yeshurun et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020160144 | Higgins et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184841 | Diamond | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003252 | Yun et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037586 | Durney | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030096072 | Johnson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030104738 | Porter | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129900 | Chiou | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148681 | Fyfe | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159390 | Fonseca | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167911 | White | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188498 | Lewkowitz | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199215 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233808 | Zuppan | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040123541 | Jewett | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147191 | Wen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161989 | Dennis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166755 | Bergmans et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050204696 | Hall | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262999 | Tomczyk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060037463 | Vittoser et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060265985 | Nichols | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080092730 | Hall | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092731 | Hall | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 360 420 AI | Mar 1978 | FR |
2007256 | May 1979 | GB |
1582539 | Jan 1981 | GB |
59146847 | Aug 1984 | JP |
62273827 | Nov 1987 | JP |
2274534 | Nov 1990 | JP |
6129137 | May 1994 | JP |
WO 0033015 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 200492495 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Application No. PCT/USO4/010488—PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and International Search Report mailed Dec. 10, 2004. |
International Application No. PCT/US05/039619—PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and International Search Report mailed Sep. 21, 2006. |
International Application No. PCT/US05/042983—PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and International Search Report mailed Sep. 13, 2007. |
International Application No. PCT/US06/034188—PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and International Search Report mailed Sep. 24, 2007. |
Australian Patent Application No. 2004230631—Office Action (now abandoned) Examiner's First Report mailed Jan. 30, 2009. |
Chinese Patent Application No. 2004800157252—Office Action (now abandoned) First Office Action mailed Nov. 9, 2007. |
European Patent Application No. 04 759 137.5—Office Actions (now abandoned) Supplementary European Search Report mailed Jul. 10, 2007. |
European Patent Application No. 04 759 137.5—Office Actions (now abandoned) Examination Report mailed Feb. 25, 2009. |
European Patent Application No. 05 846 915.6—Office Action (now abandoned) Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 29, 2009. |
Indian Patent Application No. 4877/Delnp/2005—Office Action (now Indian Patent No. 233186 granted Mar. 27, 2009) First Examination Report mailed Jan. 7, 2008. |
Singapore Patent Application No. 200506573-5—Office Actions Australian Patent Office Written Opinion and Search Report mailed May 22, 2008. |
Singapore Patent Application No. 200506573-5—Office Actions Australian Patent Office Written Opinion mailed Feb. 26, 2009. |
Singapore Patent Application No. 200506573-5—Office Actions Australian Patent Office Examination Report mailed by IPOS (Intellectual Property Office of Singapore) on Jan. 11, 2010. |
Singapore Patent Application No. 200703931-6—Office Actions Australian Patent Office Written Opinion mailed Aug. 28, 2008. |
Singapore Patent Application No. 200703931-6—Office Actions Australian Patent Office Examination Report mailed Jun. 2, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 The MSDS HyperGlossary: Distance Unit Conversions—http://www.ilip.com/msds/ref/distanceunits.html, dated Oct. 4, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691—Final Office Action mailed Aug. 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691—Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/289,511—Final Office Action mailed May 27, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/289,511—Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2010. |
Australian Patent Application No. 2005302160—Office Action (now abandoned) Examiner's First Report dated May 5, 2010. |
European Patent Application No. 05858691.8 - Office Action (now abandoned) Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 13, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/711,501—Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/289,511 Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/289,511 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 27, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 22, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 20, 2009. |
PCT/US05/42983 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority and international Search Report mailed Sep. 13, 2007. |
PCT/US05/39619 Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Sep. 21, 2006. |
Indian Patent Application No. 4877/DELNP/2005—First Examination Report mailed Jan. 7, 2008. |
Singapore Application/Patent No. 0703931-6—Australian Patent Office Written Opinion mailed Aug. 28, 2008 U.S. Appl. No. 12/711,501—Final Office Action mailed May 12, 2011. |
EP Communication enclosing EP 04 75 9137 Supplementary European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2007. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 dated Apr. 27, 2006. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 dated Oct. 12, 2006. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 dated Dec. 27, 2006. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 dated Mar. 9, 2007. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 dated Mar. 30, 2007. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/510,691 dated Jun. 29, 2007. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752 dated Jul. 25, 2006. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752 dated Feb. 26, 2007. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752 dated Jun. 7, 2007. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/264,752 dated Sep. 20, 2007. |
WIPO Communication enclosing PCT/US06/34188 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 24, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130008129 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60460422 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10510691 | US | |
Child | 13617122 | US |