Field of Embodiments
The disclosed embodiments relate generally to an apparatus and methods for shredding recyclable material, such as paper.
Description of Related Art
Material containing information, especially recyclable material, is often shredded. The recyclable material may be shredded in any suitable environment. For example, the recyclable material may be shredded in a motor vehicle. A typical motor vehicle used to shred this recyclable material typically includes a compartment with a bin lifting device to load the recyclable material into the compartment, a shredder to shred the recyclable material in the compartment, a discharge conveying/packing element to pack the shredded recyclable material into a storage area within the compartment, an unloading device for unloading the shredded material from the storage area and a control system for controlling the motor vehicle. Other motor vehicles may additionally include a feeding element that includes a conveyor or a feed drum to control the input rate of the recyclable material into the compartment.
It can be desirable to shred recyclable material to a smaller size than a standard shred size, due to customer requirements and/or for commercial advantage, particularly, if it can be done at a less expensive price than competitors' prices. Additionally, the introduction of new security and privacy regulations and laws are changing the size to which the recyclable material is shredded. The demands of customers, the need to out price competitors and the introduction of the new security and privacy regulations and laws are becoming more prevalent.
Conventional shredders provide options for shredding the recyclable material to the size required for highly sensitive information. These options include two shaft shear shredders, strip shredders, single rotor shredders, hammermills and granulators.
Two shaft shear shredders include a first shear shredder and a second shear shredder. Two shaft shear shredders generally produce a width by length shred with the width generally controlled by the width of the knives on the shredders. Disadvantages result because it is difficult to control the length to which the recyclable material is shredded. An additional disadvantage is that the orientation of the recyclable material that enters the two shaft shear shredders can significantly impact the size of the shredded recyclable material. For example, when the recyclable material stands up vertically edgewise between knives on a shaft of a shredder, the interaction between the knives and the shaft causes the recyclable material to fold and pinch between the tip of the knives and a spacer, thereby resulting in the shredded recyclable material being able to unfold after shredding. Further disadvantages result because the amount of the recyclable material can adversely affect the size to which the recyclable material is shredded. For example, if a small amount of the recyclable material is loaded into the shredders, the recyclable material can be pulled through the shredders at knife tip speed to produce long strips or the recyclable material can get folded into the hooks of the knives, thereby preventing the recyclable material from being shredded to a desired shred size. Yet another disadvantage is that passing the recyclable material through a second shear shredder may not change the length of the recyclable material if the recyclable material passes through the shredder in a longitudinal direction. Moreover, another disadvantage results because the knives of the second shear shredder are more susceptible to damage when contaminants pass through the shredder than the knives of the first shear shredder due to the knives of the second shear shredder being smaller in width than the knives of the first shear shredder.
Strip shredders include two counter rotating shafts that pull the recyclable material into a nip point between two intermeshing cutting disks. The intermeshing cutting disks shear the recyclable material into strips. Shredding the recyclable material to the smaller size required for highly sensitive information is achieved by reprocessing the shreds at right angles, to the initial shred, and to a narrower width. Some strip shredders exist where three stage reduction is employed. Disadvantages result because strip shredders are designed to cut the recyclable material into long strips, but are not good at cutting the recyclable material to a desired length.
Single rotor shredders are equipped with square insert cutters that are typically on the order of 32-40 mm square. In operation, the recyclable material is pushed against a rotor so that a gouging action tears out chunks from the recyclable material and insert cutters cut against a fixed knife. A screen may be mounted below a single rotor shredder. When a screen is normally mounted below the single rotor shredder, the holes in the screen retain the recyclable material in the machine until the recyclable material is small enough to fit through the screen holes. As a result, the recyclable material recirculates through the single rotor shredder until it fits through the holes. Disadvantages result because of the increased amount of time that the recyclable material must recirculate to fit through the small holes necessary to shred the recyclable material to a high security shred size. Additional disadvantages result because a high security shred size requirement could have a significantly negative impact on throughput capacity when the screen hole size is significantly smaller than the initial first cut shred size. Yet additional disadvantages result because recirculation of the recyclable material leads to generating dust and heat. Moreover, as recyclable materials frequently contain metal contaminants, recirculation may cause fires and dust explosions in the presence of contaminants that generate sparks. More ignition sources are created as the size of the screen holes decreases. Yet another disadvantage results because obtaining the smaller shred size for highly sensitive information requires the screen to be changed to a screen having smaller holes. Changing the screen is time consuming and difficult, if not impossible, in some designs because it could require physical access through a shredded material storage area to access the shredder. When a screen is not mounted below the single rotor shredder, disadvantages result because single rotor shredders do not tightly control the rotor to fixed knife clearance, thereby allowing the recyclable material to pass through the single rotor shredder without being shredded.
Hammermills are single rotor shredders with hammers mounted on the periphery of the rotor that turn at a high speed (on the order of 900-3600 RPM). When the hammers impact relatively stationary recyclable material, chunks of the recyclable material are torn away. A sizing screen is placed at the bottom of the hammermill and the recyclable material cannot pass through the screen until the recyclable material is smaller than the holes in the screen. Disadvantages result because the recyclable material must be recirculated to reach a size where the recyclable material can pass through the holes in the screen, thereby increasing shred time and generating dust and heat. Additional disadvantages result because reduced screen hole size reduces throughput capacity. Moreover, the recirculation may cause fires and dust explosions. Further disadvantages result when the recyclable material is metal because the hammers may cause the recyclable material to ball up. Once balled up, the recyclable material may never reach a size that is small enough to pass through the holes in the screen. Yet another disadvantage results when the hammers are dull as the dullness causes inefficient shredding, leads to longer shred time, lowers throughput and creates more dust. Additional disadvantages result because hammermills must be meter fed because they are susceptible to rotor jamming if overloaded.
Granulators are high speed single shaft knife cutters that consist of a high speed rotor (450-3600 rpm) with straight rotor blades that cut against fixed straight blade knives. The rotor is typically equipped with 3-5 fixed blades that cut against 1-3 fixed blades. A screen retains the recyclable material until the recyclable material reaches a size where it can pass through the screen holes. Granulators depend on very sharp knives for efficient production. Disadvantages result from the need to have highly trained personnel to maintain the tight knife-to-knife clearances (on the order of 0.004-0.006 inches that are required for efficient shredding. Recyclable materials are difficult for granulators since removal of metal contaminants which are inevitably contained in recyclable materials would be necessary, otherwise the keen sharp-edged blades in a granulator could quickly degrade. Additional disadvantages result as granulators must be meter fed because they are susceptible to rotor jamming if overloaded.
A need exists for improved technology, including technology that may address one or more of the above described disadvantages. For example, a need exists to give a user the option to shred recyclable material to a standard shred size or a smaller shred size required for highly sensitive information via a single pass through the system, where such a single pass produces less dust and less possible ignition sources, and for the user to pay a minimum price with minimum wear and tear of the equipment used to shred the recyclable material.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will become apparent from the following description and the accompanying exemplary embodiments shown in the drawings, which are briefly described below.
Presently preferred embodiments are illustrated in the drawings. An effort has been made to use the same or like reference numbers throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. Although the specification refers primarily to shredding material in a motor vehicle, it should be understood that the subject matter described herein is applicable to being shredded in other environments, such as for example a warehouse or other worksite. The material to be shredded often will contain information and will be recyclable, but the invention can be applied to other materials that do not contain information and/or are not recyclable.
Description of Shred Size
The shredder system can be configured to shred the recyclable material to a standard shred size and a high security shred size. The high security shred size is smaller than the standard shred size. The standard shred size can vary based on factors such as the type of shredder used. For example, the standard shred size may be larger than 0.5 inches2. More preferably, the standard shred size may be ⅝ inch by 2.5 inch, ⅜ inch by 1.5 inch, 0.5 inch by 2 inch, smaller than 2 inch round or square hole when a screen is used or smaller than ⅜ inch round or square hole when a screen is used. It, of course, could be a larger shred size. The smaller shred size may be, for example, 0.5 inches2. It, of course, could be a smaller shred size.
Overview of Shredder System
As shown in
Primary Shredder
The primary shredder 350 preferably includes two counter rotating shafts 353, 354 (
For example, in one embodiment, the primary shredder 350 may be a Shred-Tech ST15. The ST-15 shredder includes a 110 HP hydraulic drive system driven by a power take-off mounted on the truck chassis. Each of the two counter rotating shafts is a machined hex shaft designed to maximize disc knife placement options and allow for easy disc knife removal and machine maintenance. Preferably, the distance between the counter rotating shafts is 5⅞″. In a preferred embodiment, there are thirty-two disc knives, with a disc knife thickness of ⅝″ and a disc knife diameter of 6¾″. The shredder body of the ST-15 can be made from cast aluminum, while the fingers are made from “cast-in” steel. The cutting chamber preferably is 13″×21″. While the ST-15 is provided as an example, this does not limit the type of shredder that can be used as the primary shredder 350. As previously mentioned, other standard low shaft speed, high torque shredder with two counter rotating shafts can be used, if modified to include the finger mechanism 355 and bulkhead wall 356 described below.
Finger Mechanism of Primary Shredder
Bulkhead Wall of Primary Shredder
The bulkhead wall 356 (
Position of Primary Shredder Relative to Secondary Shredder
As seen in
Secondary Shredder
The secondary shredder 360 preferably includes one rotor 361 (
Rotor Knives
The rotor 361 includes a drive shaft 369 and rotor knives 363 that are attached or mounted to the drive shaft 369 (
In a preferred embodiment shown in
As shown in
Fixed Knife
The fixed knife 364 is fixed to a knife mount 467 (
The fixed knife 364 includes teeth 370. The teeth 370 may be any suitable shape. For example, the teeth may be block shaped (
The fixed knife 364 may also include a groove 463 (
Interaction of Rotor with Fixed Knife
As seen in
As seen in
The throughput capacity of the recyclable material can be optimized by controlling the clearance between the tips of the rotor knives 363 and the door 501, which forms part of the back wall (
Diverter Mechanism
The secondary shredder 360 may include the diverter mechanism 365 (
When the diverter mechanism 365 is in the engaged position to allow the recyclable material to be further shredded by the secondary shredder 360, the diverter fingers 465 intermesh with the rotor 361 of the secondary shredder 360 so that the recyclable material is caused to be further shredded by the secondary shredder 360. Furthermore, when the diverter mechanism 365 is in the engaged position, the rotor 361 rotates in a first direction (e.g. clockwise in
When the diverter mechanism 365 is moved to the disengaged position to allow the recyclable material to pass to the auger 380, the diverter fingers 465 of the diverter mechanism 365 do not intermesh with the rotor 361 of the secondary shredder 360, creating an opening between the diverter mechanism 365 and the rotor 361. Furthermore, when the diverter mechanism 365 is in the disengaged position, the rotor 361 rotates in a direction towards the opening between the diverter mechanism 365 and the rotor 361. In the embodiment illustrated in
The diverter mechanism 365 may be driven by any suitable drive mechanism. For example, the drive mechanism may be driven by the illustrated hydraulic cylinder 481 (
In another embodiment of the shredder system 450, other components within the housing of the secondary shredder 360 may be moved. For example, if the diverter mechanism 365 is fixed to the mounting structure 390, so there is no significant opening between the diverter mechanism 365 and the rotor 361, the fixed knife 364 may be moveable by a drive mechanism (not shown) to create an opening so that the recyclable material may pass from the primary shredder 350 to the auger 380 without being shredded by the secondary shredder 360. For example, the fixed knife 364 may be moved between an engaged position, in which it causes the recyclable material to be further shredded by the secondary shredder 360, and a disengaged position, in which it allows the recyclable material to pass through the opening to the auger 380. The drive mechanism in this embodiment will perform in the same way as the drive mechanism used to drive the diverter mechanism 365 in the previously described embodiment.
In this configuration, when the fixed knife 364 is in the engaged position, the fixed knife 364 interacts with the rotor 361 so that the recyclable material will be further shredded by the secondary shredder 360. Furthermore, when the fixed knife 364 is in the engaged position, the rotor 361 runs in a direction (e.g. clockwise) towards the fixed knife 364 to further shred the recyclable material.
When the fixed knife 364 is in the disengaged position to allow the recyclable material to pass to the auger 380 without being shredded by the secondary shredder 360, the fixed knife 364 does not interact with the rotor 361, creating an opening between the fixed knife 364 and the rotor 361. Furthermore, when the fixed knife 364 is in the disengaged position, the rotor 361 continues to run in the first direction (e.g. clockwise) toward the opening between the fixed knife 364 and the rotor 361. The rotation of the rotor 361 in the first direction, towards the opening, helps guide the recyclable material to the auger 380. As seen in
Auger
The auger 380 (
Chain Drive Mechanism of Auger
As seen in
The chain drive mechanism 391 is configured to rotate the first auger shaft 381 in a first direction and the second auger shaft 382 in a second direction where the first direction is opposite to the second direction. The interaction between the chain drive mechanism 391, the drive unit 388, the first auger shaft 381 and the second auger shaft 382 causes the first auger shaft 381 to rotate in the first direction and the second auger shaft 382 to rotate in the second direction. Because the first direction is opposite to the second direction, if the first direction is clockwise, the second direction is counterclockwise. Preferably, the first auger shaft 381 rotates counterclockwise and the second auger shaft 382 rotates clockwise. The counter rotating auger shafts 381, 382 thoroughly mix the shredded recyclable material, split the shredded recyclable material stream and distribute the shredded recyclable material stream. Thus, because of the thorough mixing that results from the counter rotating auger shafts 381, 382, the probability of finding shreds that were adjacent prior to entering the shredder system 450 is decreased because the population and location of shreds that must be examined to find adjacent shreds, increases when the shredded recyclable material exits the shredder system 450. For example, when the first auger shaft 381 rotates counterclockwise and the second auger shaft 382 rotates clockwise, the shredded recyclable material is pushed perpendicular to the bottom portion of the helical flight and towards the outside of shredder system 450.
Tensioner
The chain drive mechanism 391 may also contact a tensioner 384 that is configured to self-tension the chain drive mechanism 391. For example, the chain drive mechanism 391 may contact an upper portion of the drive unit 388, an upper portion of the first auger shaft 381, bottom and side portions of the second auger shaft 382 and a side portion of the tensioner 384. The tensioner 384 is designed to balance imposed forces from chain drive mechanism 391.
The tensioner 384 includes a mechanism 386 that is configured to increase or decrease the tension in the chain drive mechanism 391. The mechanism 386 may include a plurality of washers 387, such as Belleville spring washers, that provide spring loaded tension to accommodate for wear of the chain drive mechanism 391. Additionally, the mechanism 386 may accommodate for wear of the chain sprockets and components of the tensioner 384 itself. Although the tensioner 384 is a self tensioner, the mechanism 386 may also include a nut 389 and no springs. The nut 389 may be loosened or tightened to manually alter the tension in the chain drive mechanism 391.
Control System
As seen in
Motor Vehicle
Preferably the shredder system 450 is disposed in a motor vehicle 300. Though the disclosed motor vehicle 300 is a truck, other types of vehicles could be used. As seen in
Shredding and Collection Compartments of Motor Vehicle
The compartment 303 may include one or more sub-compartments for receiving the recyclable material. The motor vehicle 300 also may include additional compartments that serve different purposes. For example, as seen in
The shredding compartment 331 may include auxiliary equipment for collecting and shredding the recyclable material. As seen in
When the shredder system 450 is disposed on the motor vehicle 300, the smaller diameter of the first auger shaft 381 and the second auger shaft 382 helps keep the shredder system 450 compact, allowing the shredder system 450 to fit within the motor vehicle 300 without also having to modify other equipment in the motor vehicle 300 (e.g. the bin lifting device 312, the hopper 311 and the compartment 303). Because the first auger shaft 381 rotates in a direction opposite to the second auger shaft 382, the shredded recyclable material is evenly distributed within the collection compartment 332. For example, when the first auger shaft 381 rotates counterclockwise and the second auger shaft 382 rotates clockwise, the shredded recyclable material is pushed perpendicular to the bottom portion of the helical flight and toward the outside of the storage compartment 332.
In alternative embodiments of the shredder system, more than two shredders could be used to shred the recyclable material. Such an embodiment may include shredders that are bypassed or shredders swinging or sliding in modules. Moreover, in an alternative embodiment, the geometrical shape, size, materials used, heat treatment and surface finish of the knives could be modified.
Yet in another embodiment, a stand alone shredder system could be used. The shredder system could be supported on a higher stand and a discharge conveyor could be integrated under the secondary shredder to carry shredded recyclable material to other processing equipment such as a baler. The infeed hopper to the primary shredder could be designed to receive material from a feed conveyor. The primary shredder could be separated from the secondary shredder to facilitate the addition of material handling conveyors and magnetic separation equipment to remove metal contaminants after the primary shred operation to protect the secondary shredder from damage. Without the physical constraints of the current mobile design, additional alternative configurations of the secondary shredder are possible.
One versed in the art would appreciate that there may be other embodiments and modifications within the scope and spirit of the disclosure. Accordingly, all modifications attainable by one versed in the art from the present disclosure, within its scope and spirit, are to be included as further embodiments of the present disclosure.
The present application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IB2012/000201 filed on Jan. 13, 2012, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/433,064, filed on Jan. 14, 2011, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety entireties into the present disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2012/000201 | 1/13/2012 | WO | 00 | 9/16/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/095750 | 7/19/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1321380 | Liggett | Jan 1919 | A |
2828082 | Vander Veen | Mar 1958 | A |
2925079 | Saxe | Feb 1960 | A |
2954175 | Humphrey et al. | Sep 1960 | A |
4046325 | Tucsok et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4056107 | Todd et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4133489 | Maillet | Jan 1979 | A |
4640659 | Parks | Feb 1987 | A |
4717085 | Crane | Jan 1988 | A |
4750437 | Rouse | Jun 1988 | A |
4782729 | Mathot | Nov 1988 | A |
5065947 | Farnsworth | Nov 1991 | A |
5542617 | Rajewski | Aug 1996 | A |
5601239 | Smith et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5636801 | Kroger | Jun 1997 | A |
5871162 | Rajewski | Feb 1999 | A |
5904305 | Kaczmarek | May 1999 | A |
6450427 | Maynard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6550701 | Chang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6588691 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6719226 | Rajewski | Apr 2004 | B2 |
RE40126 | Rajewski | Mar 2008 | E |
7637448 | Hartnett | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7757987 | Kolbet | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020023977 | Nakagomi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030025019 | Coulter | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040104289 | Schwelling | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050040264 | Castronovo | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050051650 | Watanabe | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109866 | Hunag | May 2005 | A1 |
20060032957 | Kolbet et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070108324 | Castronovo | May 2007 | A1 |
20080099591 | Cerra et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100193619 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110167715 | French et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110186667 | Wark | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120006920 | Weidman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2340841 | Dec 2001 | CA |
62 727 | Apr 1891 | DE |
36 12 431 | Oct 1987 | DE |
1 166 877 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 439 103 | Jun 1976 | GB |
09-029118 | Feb 1997 | JP |
11-042468 | Feb 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2014, received in corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,813,487, 3 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Aug. 8, 2014, in corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2012206372, 4 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2014, received in corresponding European Application No. 12734061.0. |
Patent Examination Report No. 3 dated May 7, 2015, received in corresponding Australian application No. 2012206372, 3 pages. |
“DDS Plant Based Information Destruction System”, Shred-Tech Brochure. |
“HSM TriShredder 6060”, Brochure for Office Technogy, HSM GmbH & Co. KG. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion recieved in connection with international application No. PCT/IB2012/000201; dated Aug. 14, 2012. |
Drawings of product offered for sale by Shred-Tech to a third party in the United States on Aug. 1, 1997. |
Shred-Tech ST-20 Shredder System, Merck Medco Installations; Flyer. |
Video found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zj5lbHkx90s. |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 25, 2013, as received in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/000201. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140166789 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61433064 | Jan 2011 | US |