Prior to installing a head gimbal assembly (HGA) into a disc drive, it is desirable to dynamically test the functionality of the read and write transducers that reside on the HGA to determine if the HGA is defective. Testing is generally performed using HGA tester that includes a mounting fixture for supporting the HGA as well as a rotatable test disc. Such testing can include preliminary activities to align, configure, and prepare the HGA for testing, followed by the actual dynamic electrical test of the HGA.
During a dynamic electrical test procedure, the HGA is mounted on the mounting fixture of an HGA tester that supports the HGA throughout the testing process. For example, an operator may manually place the HGA into an alignment tool that sets the orientation of the HGA to an intermediate mounting fixture. The HGA is then loaded onto the rotating test disc such that the head of the HGA is suspended above the test disc by the air-bearing formed between the head and the disk. The HGA is then subjected to dynamic electrical testing, which may include, e.g., reading and writing to the test disc as well as monitoring for undesirable contact between the head and the test disc.
An HGA tester must be at least capable of holding the HGA on-track for a given track density of a product, which is commonly measured in tracks-per-inch (TPI). As track densities in disc drives increase, it becomes more difficult to provide HGA testers capable of holding the HGA on-track during testing.
In one implementation, an assembly for testing a head gimbal assembly comprises a rotatable test disc, a mounting surface configured to mount the head gimbal assembly, and a shroud covering the head gimbal assembly. The mounting surface is located in proximity to the test disc to facilitate loading the head gimbal assembly on the test disc. The shroud is configured to shield the head gimbal assembly from airflow produced when the test disc rotates.
These and other various features and advantages will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description.
One source of positional disturbance that can affect the effective track density of an HGA tester is external air turbulence caused by the rotation of the test disc. The evolution of disc drive technologies has lead to ever-faster disc rotational velocities, which has increased external air turbulence caused by the rotation of the test disc during dynamic electrical testing of HGAs. This air turbulence can excite the HGA and cause vibrations within the HGA. These vibrations can be significant at current and higher track densities and limit the TPI capability of the HGA tester. As disclosed herein, in order to reduce excitation of an HGA during testing, an HGA tester may include a shroud that shields the HGA from airflow caused by the rotating test disc.
Base 121 of shroud 120 and mounting surface 165 may be mounted to stationary base 110 to allow positioning HGA 170 in proximity to test disc 160 to facilitate dynamic electrical testing of HGA 170. In other implementations, test disc 160 may be moveable to allow positioning mounting surface 165 in proximity to test disc 160.
As shown in
Base 121 includes depressions 129A and 129B, each of which are configured to support an HGA tail during a testing operation. For example, as shown in
As shown in
Shroud 120, which is shown separately in
Cover 130 of shroud 120 is shown separately in
Component 140 includes two apertures 142, 144. Apertures 142, 144 are located above hole 137 of component 132. Hole 137 and aperture 142 allow head 172 of HGA 170 to interface with test disc 160. Comparatively, hole 137 and aperture 144 provide space that allows retractable finger 152 to move into position to deflect load beam 174. Notably, base 121 (
While cover 130 includes two components 132, 140, in other implementations, a cover may include only a single component. One example of such an implementation is shown in
Cover 130 is attached to base 121 with screw 180, which extends through hole 136 in cover 130 and is received by threaded hole 127 in base 121. In other implementations, cover 130 may be attached to base 121 using different techniques. Cover 130 includes protrusion 134, which extends in the direction of base 121 when cover 130 is mounted on base 121. Protrusion 134 provides an edge 135 that serves as a pivot point for cover 130 when cover 130 is secured to base 121 by screw 180. Protrusion 134 configured to create a moment that holds a remote portion of cover 130, i.e., the end including component 140, tightly against base 121 when cover 130 is secured to base 121 with screw 180. In this manner, the design of cover 130 allows it to be securely fastened to base 121 with a single screw.
The single aperture of cover 230 allows space for the head 172 to interface with a test disc for a dynamic electrical test. The single aperture of cover 230 also provides space that allows retractable finger 152 to move into position to deflect load beam 174.
Cover 230 fits closely within sidewalls 122 (
During a test procedure, such as a dynamic electrical test, HGA 170 is placed on mounting platform 165 and secured by collet fingers 171. Then, load finger 152 is use to deflect load beam 174 to bring head 172 below sidewalls 122 of shroud base 121. Next, shroud cover 130 is placed on shroud base 121 and secured with screw 180 to enclose HGA 170 within shroud 120. Alternatively, shroud cover 230 may be placed on shroud base 121. HGA 170 is then positioned in proximity to test disc 160. Load finger 152 is extended enough to allow HGA 170 to interface with test disc 160 such that head 172 is supported by an air-bearing formed between the head and test disc 160. HGA 170 is then electrically tested by performing read and write operations on test disc 160. Following the electrical testing of HGA 170, load finger again deflects load beam 174, pulling head 172 away from test disc 160. Then shroud cover 130 is removed and collet fingers 171 release HGA 170. HGA tester 101 may then be used to test additional HGAs.
Cover 230 includes two apertures 242, 244. Aperture 242 allows a head of an HGA to interface with a test disc. Comparatively, aperture 244 provides space that allows a retractable finger to move into position to deflect the load beam of the HGA. Notably, base 121 (
Cover 230 includes depression 240 that leaves a very thin amount of material adjacent to apertures 242, 244. For example, the thickness of cover 230 at depression 240 may be in the range of 0.0005 inches to 0.010 inches thick. As another example, the thickness of cover 230 at depression 240 may be about 0.002 inches thick. The small thickness of the thickness of cover 230 at depression 240 is necessary to allow an HGA to be loaded on a test disc without contacting cover 230.
As shown in
Shroud 320 shields an HGA from airflow produced by rotating a test disc by substantially enclosing the HGA. As previously described with respect to
A series of tests were performed. The results of the tests demonstrate the effectiveness of including a shroud to shield an HGA from airflow produced by a rotating test disc used in dynamic electrical testing of the HGA.
In a first test, an HGA test apparatus not including a shroud was operated using a test disc rotating a 15,000 RPM. The same test disc velocity was used for all of the testing. The HGA test apparatus was found to facilitate HGA testing at track densities of up to 131,000 TPI.
In a second test, a HGA test apparatus including a shroud base including sidewalls configured to shield the tested HGA from air turbulence caused by the test disc was used. An example of this configuration is shown in
In a third test, a cover was added to the shroud base. The cover included a single aperture to allow the head of the HGA being tested to interface with the test disc as well as provide a space for a retractable finger to deflect the load beam of the head gimbal assembly. An example of this configuration is shown in
In a fourth test, a different cover was added to the shroud base. The cover included one aperture to allow the head of the HGA being tested to interface with the test disc and a separate aperture to provide a space for a retractable finger to deflect the load beam of the head gimbal assembly. An example of this configuration is shown in
The implementations described above and other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4473855 | Plotto et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
5136438 | Wakatsuki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5187626 | Hopkins et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
6710977 | Tadepalli et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7538981 | Pan | May 2009 | B1 |
20070136022 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090323210 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |