Shunt device and method for treating ocular disorders

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10492950
  • Patent Number
    10,492,950
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 22, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 3, 2019
    4 years ago
Abstract
Shunt devices and a method for continuously decompressing elevated intraocular pressure in eyes affected by glaucoma by diverting excess aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye into Schlemm's canal where post-operative patency can be maintained with an indwelling shunt device which surgically connects the canal with the anterior chamber. The shunt devices provide uni- or bi-directional flow of aqueous humor into Schlemm's canal.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally directed to a surgical treatment for glaucoma, and relates more particularly to a device and method for continuously decompressing elevated intraocular pressure in eyes affected by glaucoma by diverting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye into Schlemm's canal where post-operative patency can be maintained with an indwelling shunt which can be surgically placed to connect the canal with the anterior chamber.


Glaucoma is a significant public health problem, because glaucoma is a major cause of blindness. The blindness that results from glaucoma involves both central and peripheral vision and has a major impact on an individual's ability to lead an independent life.


Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy (a disorder of the optic nerve) that usually occurs in the setting of an elevated intraocular pressure. The pressure within the eye increases and this is associated with changes in the appearance (“cupping”) and function (“blind spots” in the visual field) of the optic nerve. If the pressure remains high enough for a long enough period of time, total vision loss occurs. High pressure develops in an eye because of an internal fluid imbalance.


The eye is a hollow structure that contains a clear fluid called “aqueous humor.” Aqueous humor is formed in the posterior chamber of the eye by the ciliary body at a rate of about 2.5 microliters per minute. The fluid, which is made at a fairly constant rate, then passes around the lens, through the pupillary opening in the iris and into the anterior chamber of the eye. Once in the anterior chamber, the fluid drains out of the eye through two different routes. In the “uveoscleral” route, the fluid percolates between muscle fibers of the ciliary body. This route accounts for approximately ten percent of the aqueous outflow in humans. The primary pathway for aqueous outflow in humans is through the “canalicular” route that involves the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal.


The trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal are located at the junction between the iris and the sclera. This junction or corner is called “the angle.” The trabecular meshwork is a wedge-shaped structure that runs around the circumference of the eye. It is composed of collagen beams arranged in a three-dimensional sieve-like structure. The beams are lined with a monolayer of cells called trabecular cells. The spaces between the collagen beams are filled with an extracellular substance that is produced by the trabecular cells. These cells also produce enzymes that degrade the extracellular material. Schlemm's canal is adjacent to the trabecular meshwork. The outer wall of the trabecular meshwork coincides with the inner wall of Schlemm's canal. Schlemm's canal is a tube-like structure that runs around the circumference of the cornea. In human adults, Schlemm's Canal is believed to be divided by septa into a series of autonomous, dead-end canals.


The aqueous fluid travels through the spaces between the trabecular beams, across the inner wall of Schlemm's canal into the canal, through a series of about 25 collecting channels that drain from Schlemm's canal and into the episcleral venous system. In a normal situation, aqueous production is equal to aqueous outflow and intraocular pressure remains fairly constant in the 15 to 21 mmHg range. In glaucoma, the resistance through the canalicular outflow system is abnormally high.


In primary open angle glaucoma, which is the most common form of glaucoma, the abnormal resistance is believed to be along the outer aspect of trabecular meshwork and the inner wall of Schlemm's canal. It is believed that an abnormal metabolism of the trabecular cells leads to an excessive build up of extracellular materials or a build up of abnormally “stiff” materials in this area. Primary open angle glaucoma accounts for approximately eighty-five percent of all glaucoma. Other forms of glaucoma (such as angle closure glaucoma and secondary glaucomas) also involve decreased outflow through the canalicular pathway but the increased resistance is from other causes such as mechanical blockage, inflammatory debris, cellular blockage, etc.


With the increased resistance, the aqueous fluid builds up because it cannot exit fast enough. As the fluid builds up, the intraocular pressure (TOP) within the eye increases. The increased IOP compresses the axons in the optic nerve and also may compromise the vascular supply to the optic nerve. The optic nerve carries vision from the eye to the brain. Some optic nerves seem more susceptible to IOP than other eyes. While research is investigating ways to protect the nerve from an elevated pressure, the only therapeutic approach currently available in glaucoma is to reduce the intraocular pressure.


The clinical treatment of glaucoma is approached in a step-wise fashion. Medication often is the first treatment option. Administered either topically or orally, these medications work to either reduce aqueous production or they act to increase outflow. Currently available medications have many serious side effects including: congestive heart failure, respiratory distress, hypertension, depression, renal stones, aplastic anemia, sexual dysfunction and death. Compliance with medication is a major problem, with estimates that over half of glaucoma patients do not follow their correct dosing schedules.


When medication fails to adequately reduce the pressure, laser trabeculoplasty often is performed. In laser trabeculoplasty, thermal energy from a laser is applied to a number of noncontiguous spots in the trabecular meshwork. It is believed that the laser energy stimulates the metabolism of the trabecular cells in some way, and changes the extracellular material in the trabecular meshwork. In approximately eighty percent of patients, aqueous outflow is enhanced and TOP decreases. However, the effect often is not long lasting and fifty percent of patients develop an elevated pressure within five years. The laser surgery is not usually repeatable. In addition, laser trabeculoplasty is not an effective treatment for primary open angle glaucoma in patients less than fifty years of age, nor is it effective for angle closure glaucoma and many secondary glaucomas.


If laser trabeculoplasty does not reduce the pressure enough, then filtering surgery is performed. With filtering surgery, a hole is made in the sclera and angle region. This hole allows the aqueous fluid to leave the eye through an alternate route.


The most commonly performed filtering procedure is a trabeculectomy. In a trabeculectomy, a posterior incision is made in the conjunctiva, the transparent tissue that covers the sclera. The conjunctiva is rolled forward, exposing the sclera at the limbus. A partial thickness scleral flap is made and dissected half-thickness into the cornea. The anterior chamber is entered beneath the scleral flap and a section of deep sclera and trabecular meshwork is excised. The scleral flap is loosely sewn back into place. The conjunctival incision is tightly closed. Post-operatively, the aqueous fluid passes through the hole, beneath the scleral flap and collects in an elevated space beneath the conjunctiva. The fluid then is either absorbed through blood vessels in the conjunctiva or traverses across the conjunctiva into the tear film.


Trabeculectomy is associated with many problems. Fibroblasts that are present in the episclera proliferate and migrate and can scar down the scleral flap. Failure from scarring may occur, particularly in children and young adults. Of eyes that have an initially successful trabeculectomy, eighty percent will fail from scarring within three to five years after surgery. To minimize fibrosis, surgeons now are applying antifibrotic agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to the scleral flap at the time of surgery. The use of these agents has increased the success rate of trabeculectomy but also has increased the prevalence of hypotony. Hypotony is a problem that develops when aqueous flows out of the eye too fast. The eye pressure drops too low (usually less than 6.0 mmHg); the structure of the eye collapses and vision decreases.


Trabeculectomy creates a pathway for aqueous fluid to escape to the surface of the eye. At the same time, it creates a pathway for bacteria that normally live on the surface of the eye and eyelids to get into the eye. If this happens, an internal eye infection can occur called endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis often leads to permanent and profound visual loss. Endophthalmitis can occur anytime after trabeculectomy. The risk increases with the thin blobs that develop after MMC and 5-FU. Another factor that contributes to infection is the placement of a bleb. Eyes that have trabeculectomy performed inferiorly have about five times the risk of eye infection than eyes that have a superior bleb. Therefore, initial trabeculectomy is performed superiorly under the eyelid, in either the nasal or temporal quadrant.


In addition to scarring, hypotony and infection, there are other complications of trabeculectomy. The bleb can tear and lead to profound hypotony. The bleb can be irritating and can disrupt the normal tear film, leading to blurred vision. Patients with blebs generally cannot wear contact lenses. All of the complications from trabeculectomy stem from the fact that fluid is being diverted from inside the eye to the external surface of the eye.


When trabeculectomy doesn't successfully lower the eye pressure, the next surgical step often is an aqueous shunt device. An aqueous diversion device of the prior art is a silicone tube that is attached at one end to a plastic (polypropylene or other synthetic) plate. With an aqueous shunt device, an incision is made in the conjunctiva, exposing the sclera. The plastic plate is sewn to the surface of the eye posteriorly, usually over the equator. A full thickness hole is made into the eye at the limbus, usually with a needle. The tube is inserted into the eye through this hole. The external portion of the tube is covered with either donor sclera or pericardium. The conjunctiva is replaced and the incision is closed tightly.


With prior art aqueous diversion devices, aqueous drains out of the eye through the silicone tube to the surface of the eye. Deeper orbital tissues then absorb the fluid. The outside end of the tube is protected from fibroblasts and scarring by the plastic plate. Many complications are associated with aqueous shunt devices. A thickened wall of scar tissue that develops around the plastic plate offers some resistance to outflow and in many eyes limits the reduction in eye pressure. In some eyes, hypotony develops because the flow through the tube is not restricted. Many physicians tie an absorbable suture around the tube and wait for the suture to dissolve post-operatively at which time enough scar tissue has hopefully formed around the plate. Some devices contain a pressure-sensitive valve within the tube, although these valves may not function properly. The surgery involves operating in the posterior orbit and many patients develop an eye muscle imbalance and double vision post-operatively. With prior art aqueous shunt devices, a pathway is created for bacteria to get into the eye and endophthalmitis can potentially occur.


The prior art includes a number of such aqueous shunt devices, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,825 (providing a tubular shunt from the anterior chamber to the corneal surface for the treatment of glaucoma), U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,901 (directed to a transscleral shunt from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space), U.S. Pat. No. 5,180,362 (teaching a helical steel implant that is placed to provide drainage from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,433,701 (generally teaching shunting from the anterior chamber to the scleral or conjunctival spaces).


In addition to the prior art aqueous shunt devices described above, other prior art devices for glaucoma surgery have used setons, or other porous, wick-like components to divert and convey excess aqueous from the anterior chamber to the exterior ocular surface. Examples include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,634,418 and 4,787,885 (teaching the surgical treatment of glaucoma using an implant that consists of a triangular seton (wick)), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,436, (teaching the use of a porous device to shunt anterior chamber to subscleral space). These patents do not teach placement in Schlemm's canal.


Some prior art references for glaucoma management have been directed at Schlemm's canal, but these have not involved the placement of long-term, indwelling shunts. U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,399 teaches the temporary placement of a plastic or steel tube with preformed curvature in Schlemm's canal with injection of a viscous material through the tube to hydraulically expand and hydrodissect the trabecular meshwork. The tube is removed from the canal following injection. Because the tube is directed outwardly from the eye for injection access, the intersection of the outflow element with the preformed curved element within Schlemm's canal is at about a 90 degree angle relative to the plane of the curvature, and 180 degrees away from the anterior chamber. Therefore, at no time does any portion of the '399 device communicate with the anterior chamber. Furthermore, relative to that portion within Schlemm's canal, this tube has a larger diameter injection cuff element, which serves as an adapter for irrigation. Therefore, this device is not adapted for shunting aqueous between the anterior chamber and Schlemm's canal.


Most of the problems that have developed with current glaucoma treatment devices and procedures have occurred because aqueous fluid is drained from inside of the eye to the surface of the eye. A need exists, then, for a more physiologic system to enhance the drainage of aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber into Schlemm's canal. In the vast majority of glaucoma patients, the resistance problem lies between Schlemm's canal and the anterior chamber. The canal itself, the collecting channels and the episcleral venous system all are intact. Enhancing aqueous flow directly into Schlemm's canal would minimize the scarring that usually occurs with external filtration procedure since the internal angle region is populated with a single line of nonproliferating trabecular cells. Enhancing aqueous flow directly into Schlemm's canal would minimize hypotony since the canal is part of the normal outflow system and is biologically engineered to handle the normal volume of aqueous humor. Enhancing aqueous flow directly into Schlemm's canal would eliminate complications such as endophthalmitis and leaks.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a novel shunt and an associated surgical method for the treatment of glaucoma in which the shunt is placed to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye into Schlemm's canal. The present invention therefore facilitates the normal physiologic pathway for drainage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber, rather than shunting to the sclera or another anatomic site as is done in most prior art shunt devices. The present invention is further directed to providing a permanent, indwelling shunt to provide increased egress of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal for glaucoma management.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is an illustration showing an overhead perspective view of one embodiment of the present invention, in which the inventive shunt is comprised of tubular elements extending bi-directionally within Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 1B is an overhead view of the embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 1A, with phantom lines detailing the internal communication between the lumens of the tubular elements comprising the inventive device.



FIG. 1C is an illustration showing an overhead perspective view of one embodiment of the present invention, in which the inventive shunt is comprised of mesh tubular elements extending bi-directionally within Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 1D is an illustration showing an overhead perspective view of one embodiment of the present invention, in which the inventive shunt is comprised of solid, porous elements extending bi-directionally within Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 1E is an overhead perspective view of another embodiment of the present invention, with phantom lines detailing the internal communication between the two proximal lumens and the single distal lumen of the inventive device.



FIG. 2 is an illustration showing another embodiment of the present invention, in which the inventive shunt is comprised of perforated tubular elements and with an angulated terminal aspect of the proximal portion.



FIG. 3A is an illustration showing a perspective of another embodiment of the present invention in which the inventive shunt is comprised of elements that are partially tubular and partially open in their configuration.



FIG. 3B is an illustration showing a top view of the embodiment of the present invention in FIG. 3A, with phantom lines detailing the internal communication of the device.



FIG. 3C is an illustration showing a side view from the proximal end of the embodiment of the present invention in FIG. 3A.



FIG. 3D is an illustration showing a perspective of another embodiment of the present invention in which the inventive shunt is comprised of elements that are partially open and trough-like in their configuration.



FIG. 4 is an illustration showing another embodiment of the present invention, in which the inventive shunt is comprised of distal elements having wicking extensions at their terminal ends, and in which the proximal portion has a sealed, blunted tip with a portal continuous with the lumen of the proximal portion, oriented to face away from the iris when the device is implanted in Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 5A is an illustration showing another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which a portion of the device enters Schlemm's canal in only one direction and shunts fluid in a non-linear path from the anterior chamber.



FIG. 5B is an illustration showing an alternative embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the entire shunt is placed within Schlemm's canal but contains a fenestration to maintain fluid egress of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 5C is an illustration showing a side view of one embodiment of the present invention, in which the inventive shunt is comprised of tubular elements, with a proximal portion extending towards the anterior chamber that is shorter relative to the distal portions which extend bi-directionally within Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 5D is an illustration showing an alternative embodiment of the inventive shunt comprised of a partially open trough-like element which is placed within Schlemm's canal but contains a portal to maintain fluid egress of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 5E is an illustration showing an alternative embodiment of the inventive shunt comprised of a solid, but porous wick-like element which is placed within Schlemm's canal.



FIG. 6A is an illustration showing certain anatomic details of the human eye.



FIG. 6B is a cross-sectional illustration showing the anatomic relationships of the surgical placement of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6C is a cross-sectional illustration showing the anatomic relationships of the surgical placement of another exemplary embodiment of the present invention in which the proximal portion has an angulated terminal aspect with a sealed, blunted tip with a portal continuous with the lumen of the proximal portion, oriented to face away from the iris when the device is implanted in Schlemm's canal.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides an aqueous humor shunt device to divert aqueous humor in the eye from the anterior chamber into Schlemm's canal, in which the shunt device comprises a distal portion having at least one terminal aspect sized and shaped to be circumferentially received within a portion of Schlemm's canal, and a proximal portion having at least one terminal aspect sized and shaped to be received within the anterior chamber of the eye, wherein the device permits fluid communication between the proximal portion in the anterior chamber to the distal portion in Schlemm's canal. Fluid communication can be facilitated by an aqueous humor directing channel in either the proximal or distal portions, as described below. Fluid communication can also be facilitated by a wicking function of a solid proximal or distal portions of the device, for example.


The present invention also provides embodiments of an inventive shunt comprising a body of biocompatible material of a size and shape adapted to be at least partially circumferentially received within a portion of Schlemm's canal to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the human eye to and within Schlemm's canal, and wherein the body facilitates the passage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber into Schlemm's canal. This embodiment of the device of the present invention can be produced without the proximal portion of the previous embodiment extending into the anterior chamber. An aqueous humor directing channel can facilitate the passage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber into Schlemm's canal. Fluid communication can also be facilitated by a wicking function of a solid body portion, for example.


The invention contemplates many different configurations for an aqueous humor directing channel, provided that each assists in channeling aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal, such as by providing a lumen, trough, wick or capillary action. For example, the aqueous humor directing channel can be a fully enclosed lumen, a partially enclosed lumen, or a trough-like channel that is at least partially open. The invention contemplates that a solid monofilament or braided polymer, such as proline, can be inserted into Schlemm's canal to provide a wicking function to facilitate the passage of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal. Such a wicking extension can also be grooved or fluted along any portion of the length thereof, so as to be multi-angular or star-shaped in cross-section. The devices of the present invention can be constructed of a solid, matrix, mesh, fenestrated, or porous material, or combinations thereof.


Traditional glaucoma teaching states that Schlemm's canal in an adult is divided by septa into separate canals, rendering the complete passage of a suture impossible. Preliminary studies on adult human eye bank eyes have shown that Schlemm's canal is, indeed, patent. A suture can be passed through the entire circumference of the canal. It has not been heretofore determined that Schlemm's canal is patent throughout its circumference in normal adult individuals, as opposed to being divided by septae into multiple dead end canals. The invention utilizes this knowledge to access Schlemm's canal and to create and maintain the natural physiologic egress of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal and to the collecting channels.


The present invention also provides methods of use of the shunt devices. One embodiment of the present invention is directed to a surgical method to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber of the eye into Schlemm's canal with a device that is implanted to extend from within the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal. The portion of the device extending into Schlemm's canal can be fashioned from a flexible material capable of being received within a portion of the radius, curvature, and diameter of Schlemm's canal. All or parts of the device may be solid, porous, tubular, trough-like, fenestrated, or pre-curved.


One embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 1A, in which the shunt device 100 is shown in a side view. The shunt device 100 of this embodiment is comprised of two portions, a proximal portion 10 which joins a distal portion 25. The proximal portion 10 and distal portion 25 shown create an enclosed tubular channeling structure. The total length of the distal portion 25 may be between about 1 and 40 mm, preferably about 6 mm. The same embodiment of the present invention is illustrated with phantom lines showing the internal fluid communication path in FIG. 1B. The lumen or channeling space defined by the walls of the proximal portion 10 and the distal portion(s) 25 are continuous at their junction at the distal portion portal 20.


An alternate embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1C, in which the shunt device 100 is comprised of two luminal mesh elements, with a proximal portion 10 which joins a distal portion 25. Yet another embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1D, in which the shunt device 100 is comprised of two solid, porous elements which may provide wick-like fluid communication therethrough, with a proximal portion 10 which joins a distal portion 25.


An alternate embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1E, in which the shunt device 100 is comprised of a proximal portion 10 having two lumens therein terminating in proximal portion portals 18. The distal portion 25 shaped and sized to be received within Schlemm's canal extends in either direction having separate lumens traversing therethrough from each of the distal portion portals 20.


Other examples of embodiments of the present invention are shown in FIGS. 2-5D. FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the device 100 is tubular and fenestrated (15, 30) in its configuration, with an acute (<90°) angle of junction between the proximal portion 10 and the plane defined by the distal portion 25. Such fenestrations (15, 30) may be placed along any portion of the device 100 to facilitate the passage of fluid therethrough, but are particularly directed towards the collecting channels of the eye. FIG. 2 further shows an alternate embodiment of the present invention in which the terminal aspect 16 of the proximal portion is angulated toward the iris 40 with respect to the main axis of the proximal portion 10, with the portal 18 of the proximal portion directed toward the iris 40. In alternate embodiments as shown in FIG. 6C, the portal 18 of the proximal portion 16 is directed away from the iris 40.



FIG. 3A shows an embodiment of the inventive shunt in which a portion of the channeling device is enclosed and tubular in configuration at the junction of the proximal portion 10 and the distal portion 25, but where the distal portion 10 is a trough-like channel. The distal portion portal 20 is also shown. The invention contemplates that any portion of the device 100 can be semi-tubular, open and trough-like, or a wick-like extension. Tubular channels can be round, ovoid, or any other enclosed geometry. Preferably the non-tubular trough-like aspects are oriented posteriorly on the outer wall of the canal to facilitate aqueous humor drainage to the collecting channels of the eye, as shown in FIG. 3A.



FIG. 3B shows an overhead view of the embodiment of the inventive shunt of FIG. 3A, further detailing the relationship among the proximal portion 10 and the distal portion 25. The aqueous humor directing channel is shown in dashed lines. FIG. 3C shows a proximal view of the embodiment of the inventive shunt of FIG. 3A, further detailing the relationship among the proximal portion 10 and the distal portion 25.



FIG. 3D shows another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the structure of the device 100 comprises an aqueous humor directing channel that is both open and curved in a continuous trough-like configuration along the proximal portion 10 and the distal portion 25. The distal portion portal 20 is also an open trough-like channel.



FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of the inventive shunt with the addition of aqueous humor-wicking extensions 32 which are either continuous with, or attached to the terminal aspects of the distal portion 25. The wicking extensions 32 can be fashioned from a monofilament or braided polymer, such as proline, and preferably have a length of 1.0 mm to 16.0 mm. Furthermore, the proximal portion 10 is curved with a sealed, blunted tip 16 and contains a portal 18 in fluid communication with the lumen of the proximal portion and oriented to face away from the iris when the shunt device 100 is implanted in its intended anatomic position. The shunt device 100 can also help to maintain the patency of Schlemm's canal in a stenting fashion.



FIG. 5A shows another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the proximal portion 10 joins a single, curved distal portion 25 in a “V-shaped,” tubular configuration. The embodiment shown in FIG. 5A can also have a portal (not shown) in the distal portion 25 adjacent to the junction with the proximal portion 10 in order to facilitate bi-directional flow of fluid within the canal. Fenestrations and non-tubular, trough-like terminal openings are contemplated in all embodiments of the invention, and these fenestrations and openings may be round, ovoid, or other shapes as needed for optimum aqueous humor channeling function within the anatomic spaces involved.



FIG. 5B shows another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the body or device 100 comprises only a single, curved distal portion 25 which contains a distal portion portal 20 oriented towards the anterior chamber to allow egress of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal. The body of this device can have a length of about 1.0 mm to 40 mm, preferably about 6 mm. The external diameter can be about 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm, or about 0.3 mm.



FIG. 5C shows another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the device 100 comprises a bi-directional tubular distal portion 25 which is intersected by a proximal portion 10 which is short in length relative to the distal portion 25 and is directed towards the anterior chamber.



FIG. 5D shows still another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the device 100 comprises a bi-directional, trough-like, curved distal portion 25 for insertion into Schlemm's canal, which contains a distal portion portal 20 oriented to allow egress of aqueous humor from the anterior chamber, wherein the trough-like distal portion 25 is oriented to open toward the collecting channels to facilitate the egress of aqueous humor.



FIG. 5E shows another embodiment of the inventive shunt in which the device 100 comprises a bi-directional, solid distal portion 25 for insertion into Schlemm's canal to facilitate the egress of aqueous humor from the canal to the collecting channels in a wicking capacity. The solid distal portion 25 can be porous or non-porous.


As the inventive device is an implant, it can be fabricated from a material that will be compatible with the tissues and fluids with which it is in contact. It is preferable that the device not be absorbed, corroded, or otherwise structurally compromised during its in situ tenure. Moreover, it is equally important that the eye tissues and the aqueous remain non-detrimentally affected by the presence of the implanted device. A number of materials are available to meet the engineering and medical specifications for the shunts. In the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the shunt device 100 is constructed of a biologically inert, flexible material such as silicone or similar polymers. Alternate materials might include, but are not limited to, thin-walled Teflon, polypropylene, other polymers or plastics, metals, or some combination of these materials. The shunt device 100 may be constructed as either porous or solid in alternate embodiments. The material can contain a therapeutic agent deliverable to the adjacent tissues.


In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 1-4, the proximal portion 10 joins the distal portion(s) 25 at an angle sufficient to allow the placement of the proximal portion 15 within the anterior chamber of the eye when the distal portion 25 is oriented in the plane of Schlemm's canal. The proximal portion 10 is preferably of sufficient length, about 0.1 to 3.0 mm or about 2.0 mm, to extend from its junction with the distal portion 25 in Schlemm's canal towards the adjacent space of the anterior chamber. While many geometries can be used for channeling aqueous humor, the diameter or width of the proximal portion 10 can be sized to yield an internal diameter of between about 0.1 and 0.5 mm, preferably 0.20 mm, for a tubular or curved shunt, or a comparable maximal width for a shunt with a multiangular configuration. In other embodiments, the proximal portion is a non-luminal, non-trough-like wicking extension that provides an aqueous humor directing channel along the length thereof.


Because the nature of the iris 40 is such that it tends to comprise a plurality of rather flaccid fimbriae of tissue, it is desirable to avoid said fimbriae from being drawn into the lumen of an implant, thus occluding the shunt device. Therefore, the proximal portion 10 may contain a plurality of fenestrations to allow fluid ingress, arranged to prevent occlusion by the adjacent iris. Alternately, the proximal portion 10 may comprise only a proximal portion portal 18 in the form of a fenestration oriented anteriorly to provide continuous fluid egress between the anterior chamber of the eye and the directing channel of the shunt. Said fenestrations may be any functional size, and circular or non-circular in various embodiments of the present invention. In addition, a porous structural material can assist in channeling aqueous humor, while minimizing the potential for intake of fimbriae.


Furthermore, the proximal portion 10 may be positioned sufficiently remote from the iris 40 to prevent interference therewith such as by traversing a more anterior aspect of the trabecular meshwork into the peripheral corneal tissue. In yet another possible embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6C, the device 100 may comprise a proximal portion 10 in which the terminal aspect of said proximal portion. 10 is curved or angled toward the iris 40, and with a, blunted, sealed tip 16 and a portal 18 oriented anteriorly to face away from the underlying iris 40. Such a configuration would tend to decrease the possibility of occlusion of the shunt device by the iris 40.


The device 100 may contain one or more unidirectional valves to prevent backflow into the anterior chamber from Schlemm's canal. The internal lumen for an enclosed portion of the device or the internal channel defined by the edges of an open portion of the device communicates directly with the inner lumen or channel of the distal portion at the proximal portion portal 20.


The distal portion 25 may have a pre-formed curve to approximate the 6.0 mm radius of Schlemm's canal in a human eye. Such a pre-formed curvature is not required when flexible material is used to construct the shunt device 100. The distal portion 25 may be of sufficient length to extend from the junction with the proximal portion 10 through any length of the entire circumference of Schlemm's canal. Embodiments having a distal portion 25 that extends in either direction within Schlemm's canal can extend in each direction about 1.0 mm to 20 mm, or about 3.0 mm, to permit circumferential placement through Schlemm's canal. The diameter or width of the distal portion 25 can be sized to yield an outer diameter of between about 0.1 and 0.5 mm, or about 0.3 mm, for a tubular or curved shunt, or a comparable maximal width for a shunt with a multiangular configuration. The distal portion 25 may contain a plurality of fenestrations to allow fluid egress, arranged to prevent occlusion by the adjacent walls of Schlemm's canal. In other embodiments, the distal portion is a non-luminal, non-trough-like wicking extension that provides an aqueous humor directing channel along the length thereof.


In the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the shunt device may be either bi-directional, with the distal portion of the implant intersecting with the proximal portion in a “T-shaped” junction as shown in FIGS. 1A-1E, 2, 3A-3D, 4 and 5C, or uni-directional, with a “V-shaped” junction of the proximal and distal shunt portions, as shown in FIG. 5A. A bi-directional shunt device can have a distal portion that is threaded into opposing directions within Schlemm's canal. In the case of the uni-directional shunt, only the distal shunt portion is placed within Schlemm's canal. In these exemplary embodiments, “non-linear fluid communication” means that at least some portion of the shunt through which fluid passes is not in a straight line. Examples of non-linear shunts are the above described bi-directional “T” shapes, and the uni-directional “V” shapes, or shunts having two channel openings which are not in straight alignment with each other.


The surgical anatomy relevant to the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 6A. Generally, FIG. 6A shows the anterior chamber 35, Schlemm's canal 30, the iris 40, cornea 45, trabecular meshwork 50, collecting channels 55, episcleral veins 60, pupil 65, and lens 70. FIG. 6B illustrates the surgical placement of the exemplary embodiment of the present invention, with the relevant anatomic relationships. It should be noted that the inventive device is designed so that placement of the distal portion 25 within Schlemm's canal 30 results in an orientation of the proximal portion 10 within the anterior chamber 35 within the angle defined by the iris 40 and the inner surface of the cornea 45. Therefore, if the plane defined by Schlemm's canal is defined as zero degrees, the proximal portion 10 can extend therefrom at an angle of between about +60 degrees towards the cornea 45 or −30 degrees toward the iris 40, more preferably in the range of 0 to +45 degrees. This range may vary in individuals having a slightly different location of Schlemm's canal 30 relative to the limbal angle of the anterior chamber 35.


In yet another embodiment of the present invention not shown, the shunt device 100 is configured with one distal portion 25 which is tubular to provide a shunting functionality and a plurality of proximal portions 10 which provide an anchoring function to stabilize the overall implant device, in addition to providing fluid communication from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's Canal.


The surgical procedure necessary to insert the device requires an approach through a conjunctival flap. A partial thickness scleral flap is then created and dissected half-thickness into clear cornea. The posterior aspect of Schlemm's canal is identified and the canal is entered posteriorly. The anterior chamber may be deepened with injection of a viscoelastic and a miotic agent. The proximal portion of the shunt is then inserted through the inner wall of Schlemm's canal and trabecular meshwork into the anterior chamber within the angle between the iris and the cornea. In some cases, as incision may be needed from Schlemm's canal through the trabecular meshwork into the anterior chamber to facilitate passage of the proximal portion therethrough. One arm of the distal portion of the shunt device is grasped and threaded into Schlemm's canal. In a similar fashion, the other arm of the distal portion of the shunt device (when present) is inserted into Schlemm's canal in the opposing direction from the first. The scleral flap and conjunctival wound are closed in a conventional manner.


While the above-described embodiments are exemplary, the invention contemplates a wide variety of shapes and configurations of the shunt to provide fluid communication between the anterior chamber and Schlemm's canal. The above-described embodiments are therefore not intended to be limiting to the scope of the claims and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. An implant designed to relieve elevated intraocular pressure, the implant comprising: a biocompatible metal stent designed to partially reside within Schlemm's canal of an eye,the stent having a pre-formed curved shape,wherein the stent further includes an inlet at its proximal end shaped to reside at least partially within an anterior chamber of the eye,wherein the stent has a distal end that is non-tubular, andwherein the stent includes multiple fenestrations located between the proximal end and the distal end of the stent.
  • 2. The implant of claim 1, wherein a length of the stent comprises a trough-like aspect.
  • 3. The implant of claim 2, wherein the trough-like aspect extends to a distal end of the stent.
  • 4. The implant of claim 1, wherein a length of the stent is substantially open such that it is not fully enclosed.
  • 5. The implant of claim 1, wherein the fenestrations are oval-shaped.
  • 6. The implant of claim 1, wherein the stent is non-luminal.
  • 7. An implant designed to relieve elevated intraocular pressure, the implant comprising: a proximal inlet shaped to permit fluid ingress from the anterior chamber;a curved distal portion shaped to reside within Schlemm's canal, anda distal end that is non-tubular,wherein the curved distal portion shaped to reside within Schlemm's canal includes multiple fenestrations along its length.
  • 8. The implant of claim 7, wherein the implant comprises a biocompatible metal.
  • 9. The implant of claim 7, wherein the distal portion comprises a trough-like shape.
  • 10. The implant of claim 7, wherein the implant is non-luminal.
  • 11. The implant of claim 7, wherein the fenestrations are oval-shaped.
  • 12. The implant of claim 7, wherein an inner cross-sectional dimension of the implant is between 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm.
  • 13. The implant of claim 7, wherein the distal portion has a length of approximately 6 mm.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/349,885, filed Nov. 11, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/316,605, filed Jun. 26, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,492,320, issued on Nov. 15, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/966,889, filed Dec. 13, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,771,217, issued on Jul. 8, 2014, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/987,114, filed Nov. 12, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,850,637, issued on Dec. 14, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/445,740, filed May 27, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,700, issued on Dec. 7, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/242,385, filed Sep. 12, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858, issued on Sep. 30, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/558,505, filed Apr. 26, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,984, issued on Sep. 17, 2002, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/131,030, filed Apr. 26, 1999.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED R&D

The U.S. Government has reserved a nonexclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license in the invention with power to grant licenses for all governmental purposes.

US Referenced Citations (576)
Number Name Date Kind
2031754 Mills Feb 1936 A
2127903 Bowen Aug 1938 A
3159161 Ness Dec 1964 A
3717151 Collett Feb 1973 A
3788327 Donowitz et al. Jan 1974 A
3827700 Kaller Aug 1974 A
3863623 Trueblood et al. Feb 1975 A
3915172 Krejci et al. Oct 1975 A
3948271 Aklyama Apr 1976 A
3948871 Butterfield et al. Apr 1976 A
4030480 Meyer Jun 1977 A
4037604 Newkirk Jul 1977 A
4043346 Mobley et al. Aug 1977 A
4113088 Binkhorst Sep 1978 A
4168697 Cantekin Sep 1979 A
4175563 Arenberg et al. Nov 1979 A
4325375 Nevyas Apr 1982 A
4402681 Haas et al. Sep 1983 A
4428746 Mendez Jan 1984 A
4449974 Messingschlager May 1984 A
4457757 Molteno Jul 1984 A
4501274 Skjaerpe Feb 1985 A
4521210 Wong Jun 1985 A
4554918 White Nov 1985 A
4604087 Joseph Aug 1986 A
4632842 Karwoski et al. Dec 1986 A
4634418 Binder Jan 1987 A
4692142 Dignam et al. Sep 1987 A
4718907 Karwoski et al. Jan 1988 A
4722724 Schocket Feb 1988 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4750901 Molteno Jun 1988 A
4787885 Binder Nov 1988 A
4804382 Turina et al. Feb 1989 A
4820626 Williams et al. Apr 1989 A
4826478 Schocket May 1989 A
4846172 Berlin Jul 1989 A
4846793 Leonard et al. Jul 1989 A
4853224 Wong Aug 1989 A
4863457 Lee Sep 1989 A
4883864 Scholz Nov 1989 A
4886488 White Dec 1989 A
4900300 Lee Feb 1990 A
4936825 Ungerleider Jun 1990 A
4946436 Smith Aug 1990 A
4955900 Higashi et al. Sep 1990 A
4968296 Ritch et al. Nov 1990 A
4986810 Semrad Jan 1991 A
4997652 Wong Mar 1991 A
5005577 Frenekl Apr 1991 A
5041081 Odrich Aug 1991 A
5057098 Zelman Oct 1991 A
5073163 Lippman Dec 1991 A
5092837 Ritch et al. Mar 1992 A
5095887 Leon et al. Mar 1992 A
5116327 Seder et al. May 1992 A
5127901 Odrich Jul 1992 A
5129895 Vassiliadis et al. Jul 1992 A
5139502 Berg et al. Aug 1992 A
5164188 Wong Nov 1992 A
5171213 Price, Jr. Dec 1992 A
5178604 Baerveldt et al. Jan 1993 A
5180362 Worst Jan 1993 A
5207685 Cinberg et al. May 1993 A
5246451 Trescony et al. Sep 1993 A
5248231 Denham et al. Sep 1993 A
5290295 Querals et al. Mar 1994 A
5300020 L'Esperance, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5318513 Leib et al. Jun 1994 A
5326345 Price, Jr. Jul 1994 A
5334137 Freeman Aug 1994 A
5338291 Speckman et al. Aug 1994 A
5342370 Simon et al. Aug 1994 A
5346464 Camras Sep 1994 A
5358492 Feibus Oct 1994 A
5360399 Stegmann Nov 1994 A
5370607 Memmen Dec 1994 A
5370641 O'Donnell, Jr. Dec 1994 A
5372577 Ungerleider Dec 1994 A
5397300 Baerveldt et al. Mar 1995 A
5433701 Rubinstein Jul 1995 A
5443505 Wong et al. Aug 1995 A
5454796 Krupin Oct 1995 A
5472440 Beckman Dec 1995 A
5476445 Baerveldt et al. Dec 1995 A
5486165 Stegmann Jan 1996 A
5516522 Peyman et al. May 1996 A
5520631 Nordquist et al. May 1996 A
5557453 Schalz et al. Sep 1996 A
5558629 Baerveldt et al. Sep 1996 A
5558630 Fisher Sep 1996 A
5558637 Allonen et al. Sep 1996 A
5562641 Flomenblit et al. Oct 1996 A
RE35390 Smith Dec 1996 E
5601094 Reiss Feb 1997 A
5601549 Miyagi Feb 1997 A
5626558 Suson May 1997 A
5626559 Solomon May 1997 A
5639278 Dereume et al. Jun 1997 A
5651782 Simon et al. Jul 1997 A
5651783 Reynard Jul 1997 A
5665114 Weadock et al. Sep 1997 A
5670161 Healy et al. Sep 1997 A
5676679 Simon et al. Oct 1997 A
5681275 Ahmed Oct 1997 A
5681323 Arick Oct 1997 A
5702414 Richter et al. Dec 1997 A
5702419 Berry et al. Dec 1997 A
5704907 Nordquist et al. Jan 1998 A
5709854 Griffith-Cima et al. Jan 1998 A
5713844 Peyman Feb 1998 A
5722948 Gross Mar 1998 A
5723005 Herrick Mar 1998 A
5725529 Nicholson et al. Mar 1998 A
5741333 Frid Apr 1998 A
5743868 Brown et al. Apr 1998 A
5752928 de Roulhac et al. May 1998 A
5762625 Igaki Jun 1998 A
5766242 Wong et al. Jun 1998 A
5766243 Christensen et al. Jun 1998 A
5785674 Mateen Jul 1998 A
5800376 Vaskelis Sep 1998 A
5807302 Wandel Sep 1998 A
5810870 Myers et al. Sep 1998 A
5824071 Nelson et al. Oct 1998 A
5824072 Wong Oct 1998 A
5830139 Abrue Nov 1998 A
5830171 Wallace Nov 1998 A
5833694 Poncet Nov 1998 A
5836939 Negus et al. Nov 1998 A
5840041 Petter et al. Nov 1998 A
5865831 Cozean et al. Feb 1999 A
5868697 Richter et al. Feb 1999 A
5879319 Pynson et al. Mar 1999 A
5882327 Jacob Mar 1999 A
5886822 Spitzer Mar 1999 A
5893837 Eagles et al. Apr 1999 A
5908449 Bruchman et al. Jun 1999 A
5913852 Magram Jun 1999 A
5932299 Katoot Aug 1999 A
5980928 Terry Nov 1999 A
5981598 Tatton Nov 1999 A
6004302 Brierley Dec 1999 A
6007510 Nigam Dec 1999 A
6007511 Prywes Dec 1999 A
6033434 Borghi Mar 2000 A
6045557 White et al. Apr 2000 A
6050970 Baeverldt Apr 2000 A
6050999 Paraschac et al. Apr 2000 A
6059772 Hsia et al. May 2000 A
6059812 Clerc et al. May 2000 A
6063116 Kelleher May 2000 A
6063396 Kelleher May 2000 A
6071286 Mawad Jun 2000 A
6077299 Adelberg et al. Jun 2000 A
6102045 Nordquist et al. Aug 2000 A
6123668 Abreu Sep 2000 A
6142990 Burk Nov 2000 A
6146387 Trott et al. Nov 2000 A
6165210 Lau et al. Dec 2000 A
6168575 Soltanpour Jan 2001 B1
6174305 Mikus et al. Jan 2001 B1
6186974 Allan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187016 Hedges et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193656 Jeffries et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197056 Schachar Mar 2001 B1
6228873 Brandt et al. May 2001 B1
6231597 Deem et al. May 2001 B1
6241721 Cozean et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251090 Avery et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254612 Hieshima Jul 2001 B1
6261256 Ahmed Jul 2001 B1
6266182 Morita Jul 2001 B1
6268398 Ghosh et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287256 Park et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287313 Sasso Sep 2001 B1
6299895 Hammang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306114 Freeman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6331313 Wong et al. Dec 2001 B1
6342058 Portney Jan 2002 B1
6348042 Warren, Jr. Feb 2002 B1
6355033 Moorman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358222 Grundei Mar 2002 B1
6361519 Knudson et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363938 Saadat et al. Apr 2002 B2
6375642 Grieshaber et al. Apr 2002 B1
6416777 Yaacobi Jul 2002 B1
6428501 Reynard Aug 2002 B1
6436427 Hammang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6450937 Mercereau et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450984 Lynch et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464724 Lynch et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468283 Richter et al. Oct 2002 B1
6494857 Neuhann Dec 2002 B1
6508779 Suson Jan 2003 B1
6524275 Lynch et al. Feb 2003 B1
6530896 Elliott Mar 2003 B1
6533768 Hill Mar 2003 B1
6544249 Yu et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548078 Guo et al. Apr 2003 B2
6579235 Abita et al. Jun 2003 B1
6579256 Hughes Jun 2003 B2
6582453 Tran et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585680 Bugge Jul 2003 B2
6585753 Eder et al. Jul 2003 B2
6589198 Soltanpour et al. Jul 2003 B1
6589203 Mitrev Jul 2003 B1
6595945 Brown Jul 2003 B2
6605053 Kamm et al. Aug 2003 B1
6622473 Lynch et al. Sep 2003 B2
6623283 Torigian et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626858 Lynch et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629981 Bui et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638239 Bergheim et al. Oct 2003 B1
6666213 Svadovskiy Dec 2003 B2
6666841 Gharib et al. Dec 2003 B2
6682500 Soltanpour et al. Jan 2004 B2
6699211 Savage Mar 2004 B2
D490152 Myall et al. May 2004 S
6730056 Ghaem et al. May 2004 B1
6736791 Tu et al. May 2004 B1
6780164 Bergheim et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783544 Lynch et al. Aug 2004 B2
6827699 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 B2
6827700 Lynch et al. Dec 2004 B2
6893413 Martin May 2005 B2
6955656 Bergheim et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962573 Wilcox Nov 2005 B1
6966888 Cullen et al. Nov 2005 B2
6981958 Gharib et al. Jan 2006 B1
7033603 Nelson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7041077 Shields May 2006 B2
7077848 de Juan et al. Jul 2006 B1
7094225 Tu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101402 Phelps et al. Sep 2006 B2
7135009 Tu et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144616 Unger et al. Dec 2006 B1
7163543 Smedley et al. Jan 2007 B2
7186232 Smedley et al. Mar 2007 B1
7192412 Zhou et al. Mar 2007 B1
7192484 Chappa et al. Mar 2007 B2
7220238 Lynch et al. May 2007 B2
7273475 Tu et al. Sep 2007 B2
7294115 Wilk Nov 2007 B1
7297130 Bergheim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7331984 Tu et al. Feb 2008 B2
7364564 Sniegowski Apr 2008 B2
7431710 Tu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7488303 Haffner et al. Feb 2009 B1
RE40722 Chappa Jun 2009 E
7563241 Tu et al. Jul 2009 B2
7641627 Camras et al. Jan 2010 B2
7678065 Haffner et al. Mar 2010 B2
7695135 Rosenthal Apr 2010 B1
7708711 Tu et al. May 2010 B2
7811268 Maldon Ado Bas Oct 2010 B2
7815592 Coroneo Oct 2010 B2
7850637 Lynch et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850638 Coroneo Dec 2010 B2
7857782 Tu et al. Dec 2010 B2
7862531 Yaron et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867186 Haffner et al. Jan 2011 B2
7867205 Bergheim et al. Jan 2011 B2
7879001 Haffner et al. Feb 2011 B2
7879079 Tu et al. Feb 2011 B2
7951155 Smedley et al. May 2011 B2
7997460 Badawi et al. Aug 2011 B2
8007459 Haffner et al. Aug 2011 B2
8034016 Yaron et al. Oct 2011 B2
8034105 Stegmann et al. Oct 2011 B2
8062244 Tu et al. Nov 2011 B2
8075511 Tu et al. Dec 2011 B2
8118768 Tu et al. Feb 2012 B2
8128588 Coroneo Mar 2012 B2
8142364 Haffner et al. Mar 2012 B2
8152752 Lynch et al. Apr 2012 B2
8267882 Euteneuer Sep 2012 B2
8267995 Castillejos Sep 2012 B2
8273050 Bergheim et al. Sep 2012 B2
8333742 Bergheim et al. Dec 2012 B2
8337445 Tu et al. Dec 2012 B2
8388568 Lynch et al. Mar 2013 B2
8419673 Rickard Apr 2013 B2
8425449 Wardle Apr 2013 B2
8439972 Badawi et al. May 2013 B2
8545431 Rickard Oct 2013 B2
8579848 Field et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585631 Dacquay Nov 2013 B2
8585664 Dos Santos et al. Nov 2013 B2
8579846 Tu et al. Dec 2013 B2
8603024 Bohm et al. Dec 2013 B2
8617094 Smedley et al. Dec 2013 B2
8656958 Unger et al. Feb 2014 B2
8657776 Wardle Feb 2014 B2
8721580 Rickard et al. May 2014 B2
8753305 Field et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771217 Lynch et al. Jul 2014 B2
8771220 Nissan Jul 2014 B2
8801648 Bergheim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808219 Bergheim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808222 Schieber Aug 2014 B2
8808224 Rickard Aug 2014 B2
8814820 Bergheim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8840578 Dos Santos et al. Sep 2014 B2
8864701 Dos Santos et al. Oct 2014 B2
8882781 Smedley et al. Nov 2014 B2
8956320 Ovchinnikov et al. Feb 2015 B2
8986240 Dos Santos et al. Mar 2015 B2
8998838 Yalamanchili Apr 2015 B2
9066782 Tu et al. Jun 2015 B2
9072588 Bohm et al. Jul 2015 B2
9125721 Field Sep 2015 B2
9132034 Dos Santos Sep 2015 B2
9155653 Field Oct 2015 B2
9155654 Tu et al. Oct 2015 B2
9173775 Haffner et al. Nov 2015 B2
9220632 Smedley et al. Dec 2015 B2
9226851 Gunn Jan 2016 B2
9283115 Lind et al. Mar 2016 B2
9289324 Johnson et al. Mar 2016 B2
9301875 Tu et al. Apr 2016 B2
9492320 Lynch et al. Nov 2016 B2
9554940 Haffner et al. Jan 2017 B2
9561131 Tu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9572963 Tu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9597230 Haffner et al. Mar 2017 B2
9603741 Berlin Mar 2017 B2
9827143 Lynch Nov 2017 B2
9833357 Berlin Dec 2017 B2
9987472 Tu et al. Jun 2018 B2
9993368 Bergheim et al. Jun 2018 B2
10285856 Tu et al. May 2019 B2
20010000527 Yaron et al. Apr 2001 A1
20010025150 De Juan, Jr. et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010053873 Schaaf et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020013546 Grieshaber et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020013572 Berlin Jan 2002 A1
20020026200 Savage Feb 2002 A1
20020072673 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082591 Haefliger Jun 2002 A1
20020087111 Ethier et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099434 Buscemi et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020133168 Smedley et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143284 Tu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156413 Williams et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169468 Brown Nov 2002 A1
20020177856 Richter et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020193725 Odrich Dec 2002 A1
20030019833 Unger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030055372 Lynch et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060752 Bergheim et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030079329 Yaron et al. May 2003 A1
20030093084 Nissan et al. May 2003 A1
20030097151 Smedley et al. May 2003 A1
20030135149 Cullen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139729 Stegmann et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030153863 Patel Aug 2003 A1
20030181848 Bergheim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030187384 Bergheim et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208163 Yaron et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030212383 Cote et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229303 Haffner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236483 Ren Dec 2003 A1
20030236484 Lynch et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040000499 Maiola et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015140 Shields Jan 2004 A1
20040024345 Gharib et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059248 Messner et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040076676 Tojo et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088048 Richter et al. May 2004 A1
20040092856 Dahan May 2004 A1
20040102729 Haffner et al. May 2004 A1
20040111050 Smedley et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127843 Tu et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147870 Burns et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162545 Brown et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040193095 Shadduck Sep 2004 A1
20040193262 Shadduck Sep 2004 A1
20040210181 Vass et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210185 Tu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215126 Ahmed Oct 2004 A1
20040254519 Tu et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254520 Porteous et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254521 Simon Dec 2004 A1
20040260227 Lisk, Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038498 Dubrow et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049578 Tu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055075 Pinchuk et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050107734 Coroneo May 2005 A1
20050119601 Lynch et al. Jun 2005 A9
20050119737 Bene et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050125003 Pinchuk et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050171507 Christian et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050182350 Nigam Aug 2005 A1
20050184004 Rodgers et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192527 Gharib et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209549 Bergheim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240143 Dohlman Oct 2005 A1
20050250788 Tu et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261624 Wilcox Nov 2005 A1
20050267397 Bhalla Dec 2005 A1
20050267398 Protopsaltis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050273033 Grahn et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277864 Haffner et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288619 Savage Dec 2005 A1
20060032507 Tu Feb 2006 A1
20060036207 Koonmen et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060079828 Brown Apr 2006 A1
20060084907 Bergheim et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060116626 Smedley et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129129 Smith Jun 2006 A1
20060155300 Stamper et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173397 Tu et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195055 Bergheim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195056 Bergheim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200113 Haffner et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235367 Takashima et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241749 Tu et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060276739 Brown Dec 2006 A1
20070004998 Rodgers et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070073390 Lee Mar 2007 A1
20070078371 Brown et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088432 Solovay et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093740 Shetty Apr 2007 A1
20070106199 Krivoy et al. May 2007 A1
20070106200 Levy May 2007 A1
20070118065 Pinchuk et al. May 2007 A1
20070118066 Pinchuk et al. May 2007 A1
20070123812 Pinchuk et al. May 2007 A1
20070154621 Raad Jul 2007 A1
20070156079 Brown Jul 2007 A1
20070179426 Selden Aug 2007 A1
20070185468 Prywes Aug 2007 A1
20070207186 Scanlon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212386 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212387 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212388 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212393 Patravale et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219632 Castillejos Sep 2007 A1
20070260201 Prausnitz et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276315 Haffner Nov 2007 A1
20070282244 Tu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282245 Tu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070292470 Thornton Dec 2007 A1
20070292474 Hsu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293807 Lynch et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293872 Peyman Dec 2007 A1
20070298068 Badawi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080039931 Jelle et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045878 Bergheim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080082078 Berlin Apr 2008 A1
20080108932 Rodgers May 2008 A1
20080108934 Berlin May 2008 A1
20080125691 Yaron et al. May 2008 A1
20080161741 Bene et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080161907 Chen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080200860 Tu et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080210322 Unger et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221501 Cote et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080236669 Unger et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243243 Williams et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243247 Poley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080277007 Unger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080289710 Unger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090036818 Grahn et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043321 Conston et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090076436 Gharib et al. Mar 2009 A2
20090082860 Schieber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082862 Schieber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082863 Schieber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090132040 Frion et al. May 2009 A1
20090137992 Mallakrishnan May 2009 A1
20090138081 Bergheim et al. May 2009 A1
20090151422 Unger et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177138 Brown et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204053 Nissan et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090227934 Eutenever et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090275924 Lattanzio et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287136 Castillejos Nov 2009 A1
20090326432 Schmidt et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004635 Lin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025613 Tai et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100042209 Guarnieri Feb 2010 A1
20100056977 Wandel Mar 2010 A1
20100056979 Smedley et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057055 Camras et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100087774 Haffner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106073 Haffner et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100114006 Baerveldt May 2010 A1
20100121342 Schieber et al. May 2010 A1
20100125237 Schocket May 2010 A1
20100168644 Brown Jul 2010 A1
20100175767 Unger et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185138 Yaron et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191103 Stamper et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191329 Badawi et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100222733 Schieber et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234791 Lynch et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100241046 Pinchuk et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100249691 Van der Mooren et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100274259 Yaron et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110009874 Wardle et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110009958 Wardle et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110046536 Stegmann et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110046728 Shareef et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110066098 Stergiopulos Mar 2011 A1
20110071454 Dos Santos et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071456 Rickard Mar 2011 A1
20110071458 Rickard Mar 2011 A1
20110071459 Rickard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071505 Rickard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110092878 Tu et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110098627 Wilcox Apr 2011 A1
20110098809 Wardle et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110105987 Bergheim et al. May 2011 A1
20110118649 Stegmann et al. May 2011 A1
20110118835 Silvestrini et al. May 2011 A1
20110130831 Badawi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110144559 Lafdi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196487 Badawi et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110224597 Stegmann et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110244014 Williams et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110245753 Sunalp Oct 2011 A1
20110248671 Dos Santos et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257623 Marshall et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110319806 Wardle Dec 2011 A1
20120010702 Stegmann et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120022424 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120035524 Silvestrini Feb 2012 A1
20120059461 Badawi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071809 Tu et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078158 Haffner et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120089072 Cunningham, Jr. Apr 2012 A1
20120089073 Cunningham, Jr. Apr 2012 A1
20120109040 Smedley et al. May 2012 A1
20120130467 Selden et al. May 2012 A1
20120179087 Schieber et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120184892 Bigler et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120203160 Kahook et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120289883 Meng et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120302861 Marshall et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310072 Grieshaber Dec 2012 A1
20120323159 Wardle et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130006164 Yaron et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130006165 Eutenener et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130018295 Haffner et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130018296 Bergheim et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130079701 Schieber et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130090534 Burns et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102949 Baerveldt Apr 2013 A1
20130144202 Field et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150770 Horvath et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150773 Nissan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150774 Field et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150776 Bohm et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150777 Bohm et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150779 Field Jun 2013 A1
20130150959 Shieber et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158381 Rickard Jun 2013 A1
20130158462 Wardle et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165840 Orge Jun 2013 A1
20130172804 Schieber et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184631 Pinchuk Jul 2013 A1
20130245532 Tu et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253404 Tu Sep 2013 A1
20130253405 Tu Sep 2013 A1
20130253528 Haffner et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130281910 Tu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140034607 Meng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046437 Renke Feb 2014 A1
20140052046 Peartree et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140276332 Crimaldi et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150223981 Smedley et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150374546 Hill Dec 2015 A1
20180036172 Haffner et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180325732 Burns et al. Nov 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (82)
Number Date Country
199876197 Feb 1999 AU
200072059 Jul 2001 AU
2004264913 Dec 2011 AU
2009251058 Dec 2013 AU
1273151 Aug 1990 CA
2244646 Feb 1999 CA
2442652 Jan 2011 CA
2683224 Dec 2014 CA
92111244 Jul 1993 CH
19840047 Mar 2000 DE
100 42 310 Mar 2002 DE
10127666 Jan 2003 DE
0858788 Aug 1998 EP
0898947 Mar 1999 EP
1114627 Jul 2001 EP
1977724 Oct 2008 EP
2260803 Dec 2010 EP
2260804 Dec 2010 EP
2263621 Dec 2010 EP
2351589 Aug 2011 EP
2982354 Feb 2016 EP
2985012 Feb 2016 EP
2553658 Apr 1985 FR
2710269 Mar 1995 FR
2721499 Dec 1995 FR
2757068 Jun 1998 FR
2296663 Jul 1996 GB
11-123205 May 1999 JP
3703721 Jul 2005 JP
4031836 Jan 2008 JP
4688444 Feb 2011 JP
2012-198134 Sep 2012 JP
5255402 Apr 2013 JP
5323011 Jul 2013 JP
2013-208434 Oct 2013 JP
2014-193366 Oct 2014 JP
2014-240022 Dec 2014 JP
2022539 Nov 1994 RU
2143250 Dec 1999 RU
WO 8900869 Feb 1989 WO
WO 9118568 Dec 1991 WO
WO 9200112 Jan 1992 WO
WO 9413234 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9421205 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9508310 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9620742 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9823237 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9830181 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9835639 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9837831 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9926567 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9930641 Jun 1999 WO
WO 0013627 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0064389 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0064390 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0064391 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0064393 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0067687 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0072788 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0141685 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0150943 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0168016 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0178631 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0197727 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0236052 May 2002 WO
WO 02056758 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02074052 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02080811 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02102274 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03015659 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03041622 May 2003 WO
WO 03045290 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03073968 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004093761 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005107664 Nov 2005 WO
WO 08061043 May 2008 WO
WO 10135369 Nov 2010 WO
WO 11020633 Feb 2011 WO
WO 12071476 May 2012 WO
WO 13148275 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2017030917 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2019036025 Feb 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (320)
Entry
Defendant and Counterclaimant Ivantis, Inc.'s Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims, dated Aug. 16, 2018.
Defendant and Counterclaimant Ivantis, Inc.'s First Amended Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims, dated Sep. 6, 2018.
Order Regarding Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Glaukos Corporation, dated Mar. 18, 2019.
Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Notice of Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 1, 2019.
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 1, 2019.
Defendant and Counterclaimant Ivantis, Inc.'s Proposed Second Amended Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims, dated Apr. 1, 2019 (red-lined and clean versions).
Declaration of David Silbert in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 1, 2019.
Excerpts of File History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/294,794 (including request by Applicant to provoke interference with certain issued claims of U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,699 and Applicant's Summary of an Examiner Interview conducted on Sep. 19, 2007).
Excerpts of File History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/295,066 (including request by Applicant to provoke interference with certain issued claims of U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,700 and Applicant's Summary of an Examiner Interview conducted on Sep. 19, 2007).
Excerpt from File History of U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,984 (including Third-Party Protest filed by Glaukos Corporation against U.S. Appl. No. 09/558,505 to Lynch et al. dated Aug. 9, 2002 (U.S. Appl. No. 09/558,505 subsequently issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,984 and the present application claims priority to the '505 application).
Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production to Plaintiff Glaukos Corporation (Nos. 1-72), dated Aug. 22, 2018.
Plaintiff Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Ivantis, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-72), dated Sep. 21, 2018.
Declaration of Ajay Krishnan in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 1, 2019.
Proposed Order Granting Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 1, 2019.
Motion Index for Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 3, 2019.
Plaintiff Glaukos Corporation's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Ivantis's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 8, 2019.
Declaration of Lisa S. Glasser in Support of Glaukos's Opposition to Ivantis's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer and accompanying exhibits, dated Apr. 8, 2019.
Reply in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 15, 2019.
Declaration of David Silbert in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 15, 2019.
Glaukos Corporation's Tenth Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Ivantis, Inc. dated Apr. 9, 2019.
Updated Motion Index for Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 17, 2019.
Minutes from Hearing Re Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Apr. 29, 2019.
Order Regarding Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated May 2, 2019.
Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated May 22, 2019.
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated May 22, 2019.
Defendant and Counterclaimant Ivantis, Inc.'s Proposed Second Amended Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims, dated May 22, 2019 (red-lined and clean versions).
Declaration of David Silbert in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated May 22, 2019.
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/412,581 (including request by Glaukos to provoke interference with certain published claims of US Publ. No. 2005/009086 to Lynch et al.).
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/412,454 (including request by Glaukos to provoke interference with certain published claims of US Publ. No. 2005/009087 to Lynch et al.).
Transcript from Apr. 29, 2019 Hearing Re Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated May 19, 2019.
Proposed Order Granting Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated May 22, 2019.
Plaintiff Glaukos Corporation's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Ivantis's Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Jun. 24, 2019.
Declaration of Lisa S. Glasser in Support of Glaukos's Opposition to Ivantis's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer and accompanying exhibits, dated Jun. 24, 2019.
Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Jul. 1, 2019.
Declaration of R. Adam Lauridsen in Support of Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer and accompanying exhibit (excerpt from file history for U.S. Pat. No. 6,450,984), dated Jul. 1, 2019.
Order Regarding Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Jul. 17, 2019.
Ivantis, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions, dated Nov. 15, 2018.
Amended Ivantis, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions, dated Apr. 12, 2019.
Joint Claim Construction Statement, dated Jun. 14, 2019.
Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief, dated Jun. 25, 2019.
Plaintiff Glaukos Corporation's Opening Claim Construction Brief, dated Jun. 25, 2019.
Excerpts of File History of Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 7,850,637 (including Non-Final Rejection dated Jun. 8, 2007 and Terminal Disclaimer and Response filed on Oct. 9, 2007).
Excerpts of File History of Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143 (including interview summaries with comments on priority from an Examiner Interview conducted on Jul. 13, 2017).
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (Case IPR2019-00483 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143), dated Jul. 8, 2019.
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (Case IPR2018-01147 for U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858), dated Dec. 6, 2018.
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (Case IPR2018-01180 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143), dated Dec. 6, 2018.
Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review (Case IPR2019-00475 for U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858, dated Jul. 12, 2019.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143 (Case No. IPR2018-01180), dated May 30, 2018.
Declaration of Andrew G. Iwach, M.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143 (Case No. IPR2018-01180), dated May 30, 2018.
Patent Owner Glaukos Corp.'s Preliminary Response (Case No. IPR2018-01180), dated Sep. 8, 2018.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143 (Case No. IPR2019-00483), dated Dec. 19, 2018.
Declaration of Andrew G. Iwach, M.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143 (Case No. IPR2019-00483), dated Dec. 17, 2018.
Declaration of James E. Moore, Jr., Ph.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,827,143 (Case No. IPR2019-00483), dated Dec. 14, 2018.
Patent Owner Glaukos Corp.'s Preliminary Response (Case No. IPR2019-00483), dated Apr. 10, 2019.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2018-01147), dated May 23, 2018.
Declaration of Andrew G. Iwach, M.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2018-01147), dated May 22, 2018.
Declaration of Karen Olympia (Case No. IPR2018-01147), dated May 22, 2018.
Patent Owner Glaukos Corp.'s Preliminary Response (Case No. IPR2018-01147), dated Sep. 7, 2018.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2019-00475), dated Dec. 19, 2018.
Declaration of Andrew G. Iwach, M.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2019-00475), dated Dec. 17, 2018.
Declaration of Jacob R. Munford (Case No. IPR2019-00475), dated Dec. 18, 2018.
Declaration of Julie Marks (Case No. IPR2019-00475), dated Dec. 18, 2018.
Patent Owner Glaukos Corp.'s Preliminary Response (Case No. IPR2019-00475), dated Apr. 15, 2019.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2019-00972), dated Apr. 12, 2019.
Declaration of Andrew G. Iwach, M.D. in Support of Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2019-00972), dated Apr. 12, 2019.
Reply of patent proprietor to Notice of Opposition for European Patent No. 2260804, dated Jan. 3, 2018.
Preliminary Opinion in Preparation for Oral Proceedings for Opposition for European Patent No. 2260804, dated May 15, 2018.
Opponent's Response to Preliminary Opinion for Opposition for European Patent No. 2260804, dated Oct. 16, 2018.
Patent proprietor reply to Preliminary Opinion for Opposition for European Patent No. 2260804, dated Oct. 17, 2018.
Patent proprietor reply to Opponent's submission dated Oct. 16, 2018, dated Dec. 7, 2018.
Decision of Opposition Division following Oral Proceedings for European Patent No. 2260804, dated Feb. 14, 2019.
Statement of grounds of appeal dated Apr. 5, 2019 for Opposition for European Patent No. 2260804.
Shields, M. Bruce, Textbook of Glaucoma (Darelene Barela Cooke & Frances M. Klass eds., 4th ed, 1998), Chapters, 2, 24 and 35.
Ah-fat, Frank G. & Canning, Christopher R., A comparison of the efficacy of Holmium laser sclerostomy Ab Externo versus trabeculectomy in the treatment of glaucoma, 8 Eye 402 (Jul. 1, 1994).
Dorland, I. & Newman, W.A., Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, pp. 1762, 1772, 1766-1767, 956, 339, 1493, 1339, 617, 1178-1179 (27th ed. 1988).
Allan, B. et al., 193 nm excimer laser sclerotomy in pseudophakic patients with advanced open angle glaucoma, British J. Ophthal. 1994; vol. 78: pp. 199-205.
Iwach, A.G., Update on the subconjuctival THC: Yag (holmium laser sclerostomy Ab externo clinical trial: a 4-year report, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Oct. 1996; vol. 27 (10), pp. 823-831.
Gillies, Mark C. & Su, Tao, Cytokines, fibrosis and the failure of glaucoma filtration surgery, 19 Austl. and N.Z. J. of Ophthalmology 299, 300 (1991).
Ashton, Norman, et al., Anatomical Studies of the Trabecular Meshwork of the Normal Human Eye, 40 Brit. J. Ophthal. 257 (1956).
Allan, B.D., Mechanism of iris prolapse: a qualitative analysis and implications for surgical technique, 21 J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 182 (Mar. 1995).
Hogan, Michael J., et al., Histology of the Human Eye (W.B. Saunders Co., 1971).
European Patent Office's Final Opinion regarding Opposition to European Application No. 10183760.7, Ex. 2008 Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,858 (Case No. IPR2019-00475).
Bae, et al., “In vitro experiment of the pressure regulating valve for a glaucoma implant”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 13.5, 13:613-619, No. 5, Sep. 2003.
Cairns, J.E., “Trabeculectomy: Preliminary report of a new method”, Am. J. Ophthalmology, 66:673-79 (1968).
“Changing Perspectives in Glaucoma Management,” Innovations in Glaucoma 2010.
Chen, et al., “Trabeculetomy combined with implantation of sil-icon rubber slice for intractable glaucoma”, Eye Science, 18:95-98, vol. 2, Jun. 2002.
Fiore, P.M., et al., Use of neodymium: YAG laser to open an occluded molteno tube, Ophthalmic Surgery, May 1989; 20(5): 373-74.
Gothwal, et al., “Migration of seton into the anterior chamber”, Eye, 16:85-97, 2002.
Huang, Morgan C., et al., Intermediate-term Clinical Experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant, 127 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 27 (Jan. 1999).
Kershner, Robert, “Nonpenetrating trabulectomy with placement of a collagen drainage device”, J. Cataract Refract. Sug., 21:608-611 (1995).
Krupin, Theodore, et al., Filtering valve implant surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma, 89 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 338 (Mar. 1980).
Molteno, A.C.B., et al., Implants for draining neovascular glaucoma, 61 Br. J. Ophthalmol. 120 (1977).
Nguyen, Quang H., et al., Complications of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants, 116 Arch. Ophthalmol. 571 (May 1998).
Refojo, “Current status of biomaterials in ophthalmology”, Survey of ophthalmology, 26:257-265, No. 5, 1982.
Saxena, Sandeep. “Clinical Ophthalmology”. 2011. pp. 245.
Schocket, Investigations of the Reasons for Success and Failure in the Anterior Shunt-to-the Encircling-Band Procedure in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma, Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc., 84:743 (1986).
Scott, et al., “Use of glaucoma drainage devices in the management of glaucoma associated with aniridia”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 135:155-159, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2003.
Stefansson, J., “An Operation for Glaucoma”, American J. Ophthalmology, 8:681-693 (1925).
Tham, et al., “Incisional surgery for angle closure glaucoma”, Seminars in Ophthalmology, 17:92-99, No. 2, Jun. 2002.
Topouzis, Fotis, et al., Follow-up of the Original Cohort With the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant, 128 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 198 (Aug. 1999).
Wilcox et al., Latest Research: Tear Biomarkers, Jun. 29, 2011, 5 pages.
Yan, et al., “Schlemm's Canal and Trabecular Meshworkin Eyes with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Comparative Study Using High-Frequency”, PLOS ONE, 15 pages, Jan. 4, 2016.
Excerpt from the prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/549,350, including the Inventor Declaration (dated Aug./Sep. 2000).
Excerpt from the prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,276, including the Inventor Declaration (dated Feb. 2001).
Excerpt from the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,782, including the Inventor Declaration dated Jun. 14, 2002.
Excerpt from the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,511, including the Inventor Declaration dated Jun. 14, 2002.
Excerpt from the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,579,846, including the Inventor Declaration dated Jun. 14, 2002.
Excerpts from the file history of U.S. Pat. No. 7,563,241 dated Mar. 13, 2009.
Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-Infringement and Invalidity (May 10, 2013).
Answer and Counterclaim (May 31, 2013).
Plaintiff Transcend Medical Inc.'s Answer to Counterclaims (Jun. 24, 2013).
Excerpt of Transcend's First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant Glaukos Corporation dated Jul. 16, 2013.
Excerpt of Transcend's First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Glaukos Corporation dated Jul. 16, 2013.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Initial Disclosures, Served Jul. 30, 2013.
Glaukos Corporation's Initial Disclosures, Served Jul. 30, 2013.
Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-11) (Aug. 15, 2013).
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Glaukos Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories dated Oct. 24, 2013.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Disclosures Pursuant to Default Discovery Rule 4(d) (Dec. 6, 2013) (341 pages).
First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-Infringement and Invalidity, Filed Dec. 16, 2013.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s First Supplemental Response to Glaukos Corporation's Interrogatory No. 1 dated Dec. 23, 2013.
Redacted Exhibits A-C of Transcend Medical, Inc.'s First Supplemental Response to Glaukos Corporation's Interrogatory No. 1 dated Dec. 23, 2013.
Answer and Counterclaim, Filed Jan. 3, 2014.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Answer to Counterclaims, Served Jan. 13, 2014.
Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action propounded on Dr. Richard A. Hill, Feb. 11, 2014.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s First Supplemental Invalidity Contentions (Mar. 3, 2014) (107 pages).
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Response to Glaukos Corporation's Interrogatory No. 1 dated Mar. 3, 2014.
Petition to Correct Inventorship in a Patent Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.324, filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,782 dated May 2014.
Petition to Correct Inventorship in a Patent Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.324, filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,511 dated May 2014.
Petition to Correct Inventorship in a Patent Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.324, filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,579,846 dated May 2014.
Communication of the Board of Appeal Pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal, submitted in the prosecution history of EP1977724, dated May 8, 2014 (Board of Appeal Communication, EP1977724.
Transcend's First Supplemental Response to Glaukos Corporation's Interrogatory Nos. 17 and 18 dated May 13, 2014.
Transcend Medical, Inc's Responses and Objections to Glaukos Corporation's Second Set of Interrogatories dated May 27, 2014.
Request for Correction of Inventorship Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.48(d), dated May 27, 2014 and filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Appl. No. 60/281,973.
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of David Haffner, dated May 28, 2014.
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of Barbara Niksch, dated Jun. 6, 2014.
Joint Claim Construction Statement, Filed Jun. 20, 2014.
Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 12) dated Jun. 26, 2014.
Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories (No. 13) dated Jul. 7, 2014.
Declaration of Dr. L. Jay Katz in Support of Glaukos's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jul. 17, 2014) (78 pages).
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of Richard A. Hill, M.D., Jul. 17, 2014, pp. 1, 3-4, 240-253, and 270.
Declaration of Joseph F. Jennings in Support of Glaukos's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jul. 18, 2014) (78 pages).
Glaukos' Opening Claim Construction Brief (Jul. 18, 2014) (30 pages).
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of Gregory Smedley, Ph.D., Aug. 6, 2014, pp. 1, 3-4, 6-7, 12, 99-102, 106-114, and 203.
Transcends's Answering Claim Construction Brief (Aug. 15, 2014) (375 pages).
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions (Aug. 26, 2014) (39 pages).
Glaukos Corporation's Reply Claim Construction Brief (Aug. 29, 2014) (14 pages).
Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 14-15) dated Aug. 29, 2014.
Glaukos Corporation's Supplemental Response to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Interrogatory No. 3 dated Aug. 29, 2014.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Glaukos Corporation's Fourth Set of Interrogatories, Served Aug. 29, 2014 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Glaukos Corporation's First Set of Requests for Admission, Served Aug. 29, 2014.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Redacted Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-Infringement, Invalidity and Unenforceability (Sep. 10, 2014) (206 pages).
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Redacted Exhibit A to the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Second Amended Complaint and Amendment of Scheduling Order (Sep. 11, 2014) (205 pages).
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Redacted Sur-Reply Claim Construction Brief (Sep. 17, 2014) (14 pages).
Glaukos Corporation's Redacted Answer and Counterclaims to the Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Sep. 29, 2014) (27 pages).
Deposition of Jay Katz, Dated Oct. 1, 2014.
Transcend's Answer to Counterclaims (Oct. 17, 2014) (10 pages).
Glaukos Corporation's Supplemental Disclosures, Served Oct. 29, 2014.
Correspondence from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granting the petition to correct inventorship, filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,511 (dated Oct. 31, 2014).
Markman Hearing Transcript before Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg, Dated Nov. 13, 2014.
Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Supplemental Disclosures, Served Nov. 14, 2014.
Correspondence from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granting the petition to correct inventorship, filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 7,857,782 (dated Nov. 18, 2014).
Transcend's Responses and Objections to Glaukos Corporation's Fifth Set of Interrogatories dated Nov. 20, 2014.
Glaukos Corporation's Responses to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Sixth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-25) dated Nov. 21, 2014.
Glaukos Corporation's Supplemental Response to Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories (No. 13) dated Nov. 21, 2014.
Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.08 of Jan. 15, 2015, submitted in the prosecution history of EP1977724, dated Jan. 15, 2015.
Memorandum Opinion re Claim Construction dated Jan. 16, 2015.
Order re Claim Construction dated Jan. 16, 2015.
Correspondence from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office granting the petition to correct inventorship, filed in the prosecution history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,579,846 (dated Feb. 10, 2015).
Expert Report of Harold (Hal) J. Walbrink Regarding the Invalidity of Various Claims of the Patents in Suit and the Obviousness of Certain Claim Elements (Mar. 9, 2015) (63 pages).
Expert Report of Richard Lewis, M.D. (Mar. 9, 2015) (79 pages).
Rebuttal Expert Report of Richard Lewis, M.D. (Apr. 24, 2015) (39 pages).
Rebuttal Expert Report of Ron Yamamoto (Apr. 24, 2015) (65 pages).
Rebuttal Expert Report of John Richards (Apr. 24, 2015) (16 pages).
Rebuttal Expert Report of L. Jay Katz MD. (Apr. 24, 2015) (130 pages).
Expert Supplemental Report of Harold (Hal) J. Walbrink Regarding the Invalidity of Various Claims of the Patents-in-suit and the Obviousness of Certain Claim Elements (May 8, 2015) (17 pages).
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of Ron Yamamoto, dated May 22, 2015.
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of Joseph Caprioli, M.D., dated May 27, 2015.
Deposition Transcript of M. Bruce Shields dated Jun. 3, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Excerpts from the certified Deposition Transcript of Richard Lewis, M.D., dated Jun. 5, 2015.
Deposition of Jay Katz, Dated Jun. 10, 2015.
Webpage regarding the definition of “subchoroidal” from Merriam Webster's Medical Dictionary, available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/subchoroidal (last visited Jun. 11, 2015).
Glaukos's Motion for Summary Judgment on Transcend's Third Cause of Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Unenforceability for Inequitable Conduct dated Jun. 12, 2015.
Glaukos's Opening Brief in Support of Glaukos's Motion for Summary Judgment on Transcend's Third Cause of Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Unenforceability for Inequitable Conduct dated Jun. 12, 2015.
Glaukos's Statement of Undisputed Material Fact dated Jun. 12, 2015.
Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jun. 12, 2015.
Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jun. 12, 2015.
Deposition of John Richards, Dated Jun. 17, 2015.
Transcend's Memorandum in Support of Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Memorandum in Support of Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Vasquez in Support of Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Du Vergier in Support of Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Alyse Katz in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Joshua Stowell in Support of Glaukos's Motion for Summary Judgment on Transcend's Third Cause of Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Unenforceability for Inequitable Conduct dated Jun. 19, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Richard Lewis M.D. in Support of Glaukos's Oppositions to Transcend's Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity dated Jul. 2, 2015.
Declaration of Ron Yamamoto in Support of Glaukos's Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jul. 2, 2015.
Declaration of John Richards in Support of Glaukos's Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jul. 2, 2015.
Glaukos's Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jul. 2, 2015.
Transcend's Memorandum in Opposition to Glaukos' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Julien Du Vergier in Support of Transcend's Opposition to Glaukos' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Response and Statement of Further Undisputed Facts in Support of its Opposition to Glaukos' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Glaukos's Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Glaukos's Statement of Material Facts that Present Genuine Issues for Trial in Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of L. Jay Katz in Support of Glaukos's Oppositions to Transcend's Motions for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Joshua Stowell in Support of Glaukos's Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Glaukos's Statement of Material Facts that Present Genuine Issues for Trial in Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Joseph F. Jennings in Support of Glaukos's Opposition to Transcend's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jul. 9, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity dated Jul. 17, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Alyse L. Katz in Support of Transcend's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity filed Jul. 17, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jul. 17, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Julien Du Vergier in Support of Transcend's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Jul. 17, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Glaukos's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on Transcend's Third Cause of Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Unenforceability for Inequitable Conduct dated Jul. 17, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Second Declaration of Joshua Stowell in Support of Glaukos's Motion for Summary Judgment on Transcend's Third Cause of Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Unenforceability for Inequitable Conduct dated Jul. 17, 2015 [Redacted—Public Version].
Transcend's Letter to Judge Regarding Citation Errors and Missing Exhibit Pages in Briefing Papers dated Jul. 28, 2015.
Order Denying Glaukos Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Unenforceability due to Inequitable Conduct, dated Sep. 18, 2015.
Alexander, L., et al., Disistronic Polioviruses as Expression Vectors for Foreign Genes. 1994. Aids Research and Human Retroviruses. vol. 10, Supplement 2, S57-S60.
Alm et al., Uveoscleral Outflow: Biology and Clinical Aspects (Mosby-Wolfe 1998); chapters 1, 3, 6, and 7.
Bahler, Cindy K., BS, Gregrory T. Smedley, PhD, Jianbo Zhou, PhD, Douglas H. Johnson, MD., Trabecular Bypass Stents Decrease Intraocular Pressure in Cultured Human Anterior Segments, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Dec. 2004, vol. 138, pp. 988-994.
Biomedical Foundations of Ophthalmology, vol. 1, Harper & Row Publishers, 1983 pp. 1-74.
Bucciarelli, Patrice D., Working Model is Next Step in Team's Long Journey to Commercial Product, Healthfirst, Business First of Louisville, louisville.bizjournals.com, Feb. 27, 2004.
Coote, “Glaucoma Hollow Fiber Filters—A New Glaucoma Seton. Preliminary Results,” J. Glaucoma, vol. 8, No. 1, Supplement (1999), p. S4 (1 page).
Demailly, P., et al., “Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy combined with a collagen implant in primary open-angle glaucoma. Medium-term retrospective results”, J. Fr. Ophthalmol., vol. 19, No. 11, 1996, pp. 659-666 (abstract only).
Ellis, R., “Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Using Plastics in Surgery,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 50, pp. 733-743 (1960).
Emi, Kazayuki, et al., Hydrostatic Pressure of the Suprachoroidal Space, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 30, No. 2, Feb. 1989 (pp. 233-239).
Fine, Ben S., et al., “A Clinicopathologic Study of Four Cases of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Compared to Normal Eyes”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, No. 1, 1981, pp. 88-105.
Gedde, Steven J. et al. Three-year follow-up of the tube versus trabeculectomy study, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 148, No. 5, Nov. 2009.
Gimbel, H.V., et al., “Small incision trabeculotomy combined with phacoemulsificatin and intraocular lens implantation”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 19:92-96 (Jan. 1993).
Green, K. et. al, “Fate of Anterior Chamber Tracers in the Living Rhesus Monkey Eye with Evidence for Uveo-Vortex Outflow,” Fourth William Mackenzie Memorial Symposium, 1977, pp. 731-739.
Glaucoma—Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 10, Chapter 11, 1998-1999, American Academy of Ophthalmology, p. 9.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5-fluorouracil online_encyclopedia_entry_for_5-fluorouracil. Accessed Nov. 28, 2007.
Haag-Streit Contact Glasses Brochure, retrieved Mar. 20, 2007.
Hamard, P., et al., “Deep nonpenetrating sclerectomy and open angle glaucoma. Intermediate results from the first operated patients”, J. Fr. Ophthalmol., vol. 22(j), Feb. 1999, pp. 25-31 (abstract only).
Hill, R.A., Q. Ren, D.C. Nguyen, L.H. Liaw, & M.W. Berns, Free-electron Laser (FEL) Ablation of Ocular Tissues, Lasers Med Sci 1998, vol. 13, pp. 219-226.
Hill, Richard A., MD, George Baerveldt, MD, Serdar A. Ozler, MD, Michael Pickford, BA, Glen A. Profeta, BS, & Michael W. Berns, PhD, Laser Trabecular Ablation (LTA), Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1991, vol. 11, pp. 341-346.
Histology of the Human Eye, An Atlas and Textbook, Chapter Eight: Choroid (1971) (74 pages).
Hoerauf, Hans, Christopher Wirbelauer, Christian Scholz, Ralf Engelhardt, Peter Koch, Horst Laqua, and Reginald Birngruber, Slit-lamp-adapted optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment, Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2000, vol. 238, pp. 8-18.
Hoskins, H. Dunbar, et al., Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas, Chapter 4: Aqueous Humor Outflow, 61 edition, pp. 41-66 (1989) (28 pages).
“Hyaluronan” article, online encyclopedia, section on “Medical Applications” accessed Monday Sep. 27, 2010, http://en.wikipedia.org/wikiHyaluronic_acid.
“Improving the flow: A survey of available implants”, EW Practice Management, Oct. 11, 1999, website “http//www.eyeworld.org/tooltime/999inserts.asp”.
Jacobi, Phillip C., MD, Thomas S. Dietlein, MD and Gunter K. Krieglstein, MD, Microendoscopic Trabecular Surgery in Glaucoma Management, Ophthalmology, 1999 vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 538-544
Jacobi, Phillip C., MD, Thomas S. Dietlein, MD and Gunter K. Krieglstein, MD, Bimanual Trabecular Aspiration in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, 1998, vol. 105, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 886-894.
Jacobi, Phillip C., MD, Thomas S. Dietlein, MD and Gunter K. Krieglstein, MD, Goniocurettage for Removing Trabecular Meshwork: Clinical Results of a new Surgical Technique in Advanced Chronic Open-Angle Glaucoma, American Journal of Ophthalmology, May 1999, pp. 505-510.
Johnson, et al., Schlemm's Canal Becomes Smaller After Successful Filtration Surgery, (reprinted) ARCM Ophthalmol/vol. 118, Sep. 2000 (www.archophthalmol.com) p. 1251-1256.
Johnson, M. C., et al.: The Role of Schlemm's Canal in Aqueous Outflow from the Human Eye; Investigative Ophhalmology; Mar. 1983; vol. 24, pp. 321-325.
Jordon, et al., “A Novel Approach to Suprachoroidal Drainage for the Surgical Treatment of Intractable Glaucoma,” J Glaucoma 15(3): 200-205 (2006).
Jens F. Jordan, Thomas S. Dietlein, Sven Dinslage, Christoph Lüke, Walter Konen, Günter K. Krieglstein, Cyclodialysis ab interno as a surgical approach to intractable glaucoma, Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2007) 245:1071-1076.
Kampik, Anselm Franz Grehn, Nutzen und Risiken Augenärzticher Therapie, Hauptreferate der XXXIII, Essener Fortbildung für Augenärzte, Dec. 1998. (English translated version enclosed Benefits and Risks of Ophthalmological Therapy).
Karlen, M. E., et al., “Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results”, Br. J. Ophthalmol. vol. 83, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 6-11 (abstract only).
Katuri, Kalyan C., Asrani, Sanjay and Ramasubramanian, Melur K., “Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Sensors”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2008, 8 pp.
Klemm, A. Balazs, J. Draeger, R. Wiezorrek, Experimental use of space-retaining substances with extended duration: functional and morphological results, Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (1995) 233:592-597.
Lee et al., “Aqueous-venous Shunt and Intraocular Pressure. Preliminary Report of Animal Studies,” Investigative Opthalmology, vol. 5, No. 1 (Feb. 1966), pp. 59-64 (6 pages).
Llobet, et al., Understanding Trabecular Meshwork Physiology: A Key to the Control of Intraocular Pressure?, News Physiol Sci vol. 18, pp. 205-209 (2003).
McAllister, A., et al., Recombinant yellow fever viruses are effective therapeutic vaccines for treatment of murine experimentalsolid tumors and pulmonary metastases. Oct. 2000. Journal of Virology. Vo. 74, No. 19, : 9197-9205, see Fig 1 and pp. 9202-9204.
McGehee, Blake E. et al., “Bilateral Retinal Detachment in a Patient with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome,” Emergency Radiology (2005) 11: 366-371.
Mermoud, A., et al., “Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma”, J. Cataracat Refract. Surg., vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 323-331 (abstract only).
Miyazaki, Akiko, et al., Postoperative Results of Combined Trabeculotomy, Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation With Self-Sealing Wound, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery, 1997, pp. 537-542, vol. 10, No. 4.
Moses, Robert A., M.D.; Circumferential Flow in Schlemm's Canal; American Journal of Ophthalmology, Sep. 1979, vol. 88, No. 3, Part II, :pp. 585-591.
Needle gauge comparison chart, wikipedia, Feb. 22, 2016.
Pesin, Michael A. J., Sr., et al., Management of late-onset angle-closure glaucoma associated with retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthamology 98(7): 1991 1093-98.
Portney, G., M.D., “Silicone Elastomer Implantation Cyclodialysis: A Negative Report,” Arch. Opthalmol., vol. 89, pp. 10-12 (Jan. 1973).
Ripart et al., Medical Canthus Single-Injection Episcleral (Sub-Tenan Anesthesia): Computed Tomography Imaging. International Ophthalmology 14: 11%124, 1990.
Ritch, et al., “Uveoscleral Outflow,” The Glaucomas, 2nd Edition, Chapter 15, pp. 337-343, 1996.
Rizq, et al., Intraocular Pressure Measurement at the Choroid Surface: A Feasibility Study with Implications for Implantable Microsystems, Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:868-871, Jul. 2001.
Rosenberg, et al., “Implants in Glaucoma Surgery”, The Glaucomas 1996, Chapter 88, pp. 1783-1807 (27 pages).
Rowan, MD, Combined Cyclodialysis and Cataract Surgery, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Dec. 1998, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 962-968 (9 pages).
Ruffolo, Robert R., Jr.,; Distribution and Function of Peripheral-Adrenoceptors in the Cardiovascular System; Pharm. Biochem and Behavior, 22, 827 (1985).
Saheb et al., Optical Coherence Tomography of the Suprachoroid After CyPass Micro-Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma, Br. J. Ophthalmology, 98:19-23 (2014).
Samalonis, Lisa B., “New Horizons in the surgical treatment of glaucoma”, EW Glaucoma, Oct. 11, 1999, website “http//www.eyeworld.org/sep99/999p62.asp”.
Schwartz, Arthur L., MD, & Douglas R. Anderson, MD, Trabecular Surgery, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 92, Aug. 1974, pp. 134-138.
Sherman, Steven H., et al., “The Fate of Anterior Chamber Fluorescein in the Monkey Eye 1. The Anterior Chamber Outflow Pathways”, Exp. Eye Res. vol. 27, pp. 159-173 (1978) (15 pages).
Shields, M. Bruce, MD, A Study Guide for Glaucoma: Aqueous Humor Dynamics, Copyright 1982, pp. 6-43.
Shields, M. Bruce, Aqueous Humor Dynamics, Textbook of Glaucoma, Fourth Ed., Williams & Wilkins Publishers, 1998, Ch. 2, pp. 5-31.
Smit, Barbara A., M.D., Ph.D., et al.; Effects of Viscoelastic Injection into Schlemm's Canal in Primate and Human Eyes; American Academy of Ophthalmology; Apr. 2002; No. 109, No. 4: pp. 786-792.
Spiegel, Detlev et al., “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients With POAG?” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 30, No. 6, Jun. 1999.
Spiegel, Detlev, “Benefits and Risks of Ophthalmological Treatment” Bucherei des Augenarztes / The Ophthalmologist's Library, vol. 139, Oct. 15, 1998.
Strange, Kevin (edited by), Cellular and Molecular Physiology of Cell Volume Regulation, Library of Congress Cataloging in-Publication Data, CRC Press, Inc., 1994 pp. 312-321.
Timmermans, et al., Possible Subdivion of Postsynapic Adrenoceptors Mediating Pressor Responses in the Pithed Rat; Nauyn-Schmeideberg's Arch. Pharmacol., 310, pp. 189-193 (1979).
Toris, Carol B. Aqueous humor dynamics I. Current topics in membranes. In: Civan, MM (Ed.) The Eye's Aqueous Humor, 62, (2008): 193-229).
Toris, Carol B., Uveoscleral Outflow, Current understanding and methods of measurement, Glaukoma Today, Sep./Oct. 2013, pp. 36-37.
“Transcend Medical CyPass® System—Instructions for Use,” (Release date Apr. 29, 2013).
Tripathi, et al., Functional Anatomy of the Anterior Chamber Angle, Biomedical Foundation of Ophthalmology, vol. 1, Chapter 10,pp. 1-74; edited by Thomas Dune and Edward Jaeger, Revised Edition, 1983,—Harper & Row, Publishers.
Excerpt of Ramesh C. Tripathi & Brenda J. Tripathi, Chapter 1: Anatomy of the Human Eye, Orbit, and Adnexa, in Ramesh C. Tripathi & Brenda J. Tripathi, The Eye (Academic Press, Inc. 1984).
Troncoso, Manuel U., Use of tantalum implants for inducing a permanent hypotony in rabbits' eyes, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 1949, pp. 499-508 (11 pages).
Troncoso, “Cyclodialysis with Insertion of a Metal Implant in the Treatment of Glaucoma”.
Tun, et al., Assessment of Trabecular Meshwork Width Using Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography, 251:6 Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1587 (2013).
Volk, “Aspheric Ophthalmic Lenses”, Refraction, International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol. 5, No. 2, Jun. 1965.
Wagner, Justin A., Edwards, Aurélie, and Schuman, Joel S., Characterization of Uveoscleral Outflow in Enucleated Porcine Eyes Perfused Under Constant Pressure, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Sep. 2004; 45(9): 3203-3206 (9 pages).
Walter, et al., Development of a Completely Encapsulated Intraocular Pressure Sensor, Ophthalmic Research 2000: 32:278-284.
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language (Unabridged), definitions of “deploy” and “deployment”, p. 605 (2002) (4 pages).
Wilson, Ellen D., “Implants offer choices for glaucoma surgeons”, EW Glaucoma, Oct. 11, 1999, website “http://www.eyeorld.org/sep99/999p60.asp”.
Wilcox, Michael J. et al., “Hypothesis for Improving Accessory Filtration by Using Geometry” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 3, No. 3, 1994.
Wilcox, Michael J. et al., “Performance of a New, Low-volume, High-Surface Area Aqueous Shunt in Normal Rabbit Eyes” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 9 No. 1, Feb. 2000, pp. 74-82.
Zhou, Jianbo, PhD, Gregory T. Smedley, PhD., A Trabecular Bypass Flow Hypothesis, Feb. 2005, vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 74-83.
Ozdamar, et al., “Suprachoroidal Seton Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma: A novel Surgical Technique”, Journal of Glaucoma 12:354-359, 2003.
Tsontcho Ianchulev, Chapter 21: The CyPass Suprachoroidal Micro-Stent, in J.R. Samples & I.I.K. Ahmed (eds.), Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma 229 (Springer Science+Business Media 2014).
Tsontcho Ianchulev et al., “Minimally Invasive Ab-Interno Suprachoroidal Device (CyPass) for IOP Control in Open-Angle Glaucoma,” presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Oct. 16-19, 2010, Chicago, IL.
Ophthalmology Oct. 16-19, 2010, Chicago, IL.
Tsontcho Ianchulev, Chapter 3: Suprachoroidal Space as a Therapeutic Target, in J.R. Samples & I.I.K. Ahmed (eds.), Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma 33 (Springer Science+Business Media 2014).
Website entitled, “About Glaukos—History,” available at: http://www.glaukos.com/about-glaukos/history (last accessed Jun. 29, 2015).
Office Action in related European application No. 04779911.9, dated Apr. 17, 2009, 4 pp.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/281,973, entitled “Glaucoma Shunt and Methods Thereof for Glaucoma Treatment,” to Tu (filed Apr. 17, 2001).
European Extended Search Report in Application No. 15166921.5 dated Dec. 15, 2015.
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-188283 dated Sep. 4, 2015.
First Office Action in Australian Application No. 2014-201621 dated Mar. 5, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061967 dated Jun. 28, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2014/024889 dated Jul. 17, 2014.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2014/024889 dated Sep. 15, 2015.
Office Action in European Application No. 14717584.8 dated Jul. 15, 2016.
Office Action from the USPTO dated Jun. 28, 2010 and Glaukos's response to that Office Action from the file history of U.S. Pat. No. 8,075,511.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2016/053570 dated Mar. 9, 2017.
Expert Report of M. Bruce Shields, M.D. (Mar. 9, 2015) (785 pages).
Supplemental Expert Report of M. Bruce Shields MD Regarding Invalidity of Various Claims of Glaukos' Patents-in-Suit (May 8, 2015) (105 pages).
De Juan et al., “Refinements in microinstrumentation for vitrous surgery,” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 109:218-20 (1990).
Oatts et al., “In vitro an in vivo comparison of two suprachoroidal shunts,” Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54:5416-23 (2013).
Notice of Opposition filed Jul. 17, 2017 in EP Application No. EP 2260804.
Order Regarding Claim Construction, dated Aug. 16, 2019.
Order Regarding Defendant Ivantis, Inc.'s Renewed Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, dated Jul. 17, 2019.
Communication of the Board of the Appeal of the European Patent Office regarding Patent No. 2260804 (dated Sep. 26, 2019).
Reply by Opponent Ivantis to Brief of Patentee regarding European Patent No. 2260804 (dated Sep. 20, 2019).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180104102 A1 Apr 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60131030 Apr 1999 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10987114 Nov 2004 US
Child 12966889 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 15349885 Nov 2016 US
Child 15821130 US
Parent 14316605 Jun 2014 US
Child 15349885 US
Parent 12966889 Dec 2010 US
Child 14316605 US
Parent 10445740 May 2003 US
Child 10987114 US
Parent 10242385 Sep 2002 US
Child 10445740 US
Parent 09558505 Apr 2000 US
Child 10242385 US