The present invention relates to shutters and in particular to shutters of the roller type. It furthermore relates to an end retention system for use with a slat of a rolling shutter.
Conventional roller shutters are designed to provide security from break-ins and protection from storms. Because such protection and security may not always be necessary or desired, such as during the day when a retail store is open for business or during fine weather when a homeowner wishes to open windows, roller shutters are designed to be retractable into a casing in which they are stored. To facilitate compact storage, the rigid shutter slats that are designed to resist hurricane winds and burglars must be capable of conforming to a roll.
The slats of roller shutters are commonly aligned and held in place by guides, or side tracks. End retention systems are known for use in rolling shutters and doors to keep the shutter curtain engaged in the side tracks during pressure caused by winds, or by would-be intruders attempting to force the shutters open. Several types of end retention systems are known in the art. Some of these systems change the diameter of the roll at the spot where the end retention system has been placed. Special tracks have been designed to provide special channels for end retention systems so that the end retention system does not change the rolled curtain configuration at these points where the end retention system is installed.
These special tracks may be undesirable because they may require special channels that limit the amount of horizontal travel, or “slip” (travel in the plane of the shutter that is perpendicular the direction of opening and closing of the shutter, which is usually vertical) the shutter curtain has in its operation. This limited amount of slip increases the pressure on the fastening system that holds the guides to the structure caused by catenary forces established when the curtain is put under load. It may be desirable to increase the amount of slip that the shutter curtain can absorb before the load is transferred to the fasteners due to the retention of the shutter slats.
Another drawback of the channels of these special tracks is that they may increase the necessary sophistication of the overall shutter design to allow for funneling the end retention system into the channels and for keeping the shutter curtain correctly aligned. Typically, the end retention system has an end that is no wider than the width of the profile of the slats of the shutter, so that there is no change in the rolled configuration. To accommodate this, the diameter of the end retention system may be reduced to allow for the system to move in the void between the end retention fins of the side tracks.
One simple end retention system of this type is a screw that fastens into the shutter curtain profile, for example to the side of a slat, and extends beyond the end retention fins of the side track. The screw may have a large head that is roughly equal to the width of the curtain profile (which is generally the same as the width of the profile of a single slat) so it is not so large as to increase the diameter of the rolled curtain, but large enough that it will be held captive by the end retention fins of the side track.
One problem that may arise with this type of end retention system is that a moment may be created in the screw (fastener), because it extends from the curtain profile and may act as a lever. If the end retention system happens to be out of line or catches on the retention fins of the side tracks or something else, the system can be bent or torn out and can cause a malfunction of the operation of the shutter curtain. To increase the desired slip in a system using special tracks, the channel sizes may need to be increased, which requires more material, and may also increases the possibility of failure due to increased moment of the longer shaft.
It may be desirable to maximize the engagement between the end retention fins and the end retention system. Many known end retention systems limit the end retention system's size to be no wider than the curtain profile depth, so that the retention system does not engage an adjacent profile or an adjacent profile's end retention system when the shutter curtain is rolled up. These types of end retention systems, however, may limit the amount of engagement between the end retention fins and the end retention system.
If the desirable level of engagement is attained, it may be possible to reduce the number of end retention systems used in a shutter curtain. Instead of using an end retention system in every slat, for example, it may be possible to only install an end retention system in every other slat, every third slat, or the like, and still achieve a desired strength. Systems that attain this increased engagement are referred to herein as “increased engagement end retention systems.”
One known increased engagement end retention system is the Alulux CD41/S end retention system, which is configured to be inserted into the hollow profiles of a number of slats in a shutter curtain. This end retention system has a shape such that if one system interferes with an adjacent system when the shutter curtain is rolled up, the system will slide off of the adjacent system, realigning the curtain. This resulting movement of the shutter slats can put undo force on these systems, and may be undesirable because it could loosen or dislodge the end retention system. One could calculate which end retention system is likely to engage another in a given shutter design, and could extend some systems so they do not engage adjacent ones. This extension may be undesirable, however, because it difficult to insure the correct systems are extended, and because the systems may not all engage the retention fins uniformly when the shutter is put under a load. Such a system also may not be a good solution for single wall shutter profiles, because of the limited shutter curtain profile width and lack of interior cavity make affixing such an end retention system difficult.
Another increased engagement end retention system is the ALULUX CD 77/2 system, which slips out of the way of an adjacent system when the shutter curtain is rolled up. This system only lets the end retention system slide in one plane. This system uses multiple points of engagement or tracks to maintain the movement on this desired plane.
This ALULUX CD 77/2 increased engagement end retention system has an increased engagement because the system is wider than the width of the curtain profile. This end retention system can be used with a less complex side track system; such as such as the ALULUX UP 250/S, to retain the shutter profile in the side track. This arrangement may allow for an increase in the desired slip without changing the shape of the side tracks, since the end retention system is wider than the width of the curtain profile when in the side tracks. Also because this end retainer system is adjacent to the curtain profile it significantly reduces the moment put on the attachment system to the curtain profile making it stronger and less prone to failure. However, this end retention system achieves these benefits by its increased size, and therefore suffers from the problems described above regarding large end retention systems.
Generally, the use of end retention systems may allow for the use of smaller and thinner curtain profiles to attain desirable resistances to pullout. These smaller and thinner curtain profiles are desirable because they require less material to manufacture, they are able to roll up in a smaller diameter requiring less material to house the rolled shutter, and they reduce the torque required to operate the shutter due to the decreased overall weight of the shutter curtain. However, increased engagement end retention systems generally are not easily inadaptable for use with these thinner profile shutter curtains. It would be desirable to provide an increased engagement end retention system that is adapted for use with thinner (single walled) shutter curtains.
An end retention system for a rolling shutter system is provided. The end retention system comprises a fastener that has a head and a shaft, and a washer that has an outer diameter and an aperture having an inner diameter. The inner diameter of the aperture of the washer may be at least twice the diameter of the shaft of the fastener. The shaft may be configured for insertion into a screw boss receptacle of a shutter slat.
The end retention system may also comprise a guide track that has a retention fins spaced apart a distance that is less than the outer diameter of the washer. The guide may include a channel that is partially bounded by the retention fins. The channel may have a width that is greater than the outer diameter of the washer. The washer is located in the channel, and is retained near the slat by the head of the fastener.
The fastener may have a second shaft, which is smooth. Additionally, the fastener may have a lip, where the lip is located between the first and second shafts. The lip may facilitate the alignment of the shutter slat with an adjacent shutter slat in the rolling shutter system.
Additional features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
Embodiments of the invention will now be explained in further detail by way of example only with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
The prior art end retention system 26 may be coupled to the shutter slat 1 for use with the prior art guide 43 by inserting the screw 51 into the boss receptacle 10. The head 29 of the retention screw 51 retains the washer 50 near the shutter slat 1. Because the washer 49 is wider than the distance that separates the second retention fins 54, the retention system 26 retains the shutter slat 1 within the first channel 47.
In the prior art end retention system 26, the shaft 53 of the screw 51 extends a distance 52 from inner retaining surfaces 55 of second retention fins 54 in order to allow for a desirable amount of horizontal slide (in the right-left directions in
Additionally, in order to retain the slat 1 between the first retention fins 46 in this prior art system, it is necessary to include the second retention fins 54. This is because the first retention fins 46 are “centered” with respect to slat 1 (and with respect to the guide 43), while the boss receptacle 10 and the screw 51 coupled thereto are offset with respect to the center of the slat 1. If the second retention fins 54 were removed, and the shaft 53 of the screw 51 were shortened so that the washer 49 was against the end of the slat 1, then force exerted on the slat 1 (such as the force created by wind) would tend to pull the washer 49 through the space between the retention fins 46. Additionally, as shown in
Because the screw 51 is offset with respect to the center of the slat 1, the outer diameter of the washer 49 cannot be simply increased to compensate for this tendency, because the offsetting limits the outer diameter of the washer 49 to the distance from the screw shaft 53 to the closer wall of the guide 43. It would be desirable to eliminate the need for the second retention fins 54 and provide an end retention system that does not require extending the screw shaft 53 away from the slat 1, while not increasing the likelihood that the washer 49 will be pulled into the space between the first retention fins 46.
A prior art end retention system 60 that eliminates the second retention fins 54 is shown in
The head 71 of the retention screw 70 and the washer 61 protrude from the boss receptacle 10 of the slat 1, and are able to move within the first channel 48 of the guide 57. The head 71 of the retention screw 70 retains the washer 61 to the shutter slat 1 because the head 71 of the screw 70 is wider than the aperture 62 of the washer 61. Consequently, because the outer diameter of the washer 61 is greater than the distance that separates the retention fins 56, the washer 61 is retained within the first channel 48, and the retention system 60 retains the shutter slat 1 within the guide 57.
The end retention system 60 allows the first retention fins 56, which may accommodate weather strips 40, to be the sole retention fins in the guide 57 (in other words, second retention fins 54 used in the first prior art end retention system shown in
Nevertheless, the end retention system 60 causes operation of the shutter 20 to be loud, “jerky,” vibration-prone, and energy inefficient. This is because the aperture 62 is offset with respect to the center of the washer 61, so that the washer 61 rotates in an undesirable “cam-like” manner around the screw 70, as shown in
In order to provide an end retention system that does not require the second retention fins 54 and the extended screw shaft 53 as in the first prior art system 26, while avoiding the cam-like rotation of the second prior art system 60, a new design for an end retention system is shown in
Additionally, the term “washer” is used to describe a rounded object that includes at least one aperture through which the shaft of the screw 8 may pass. The rounded object may be oblong, circular, or may comprise part of a sphere or an ellipsoid. The aperture may or may not be centered in the object, and may or may not have a circular cross section. The use of the term “washer” herein and in the attached claims should be read to include all manner of rounded objects having an aperture that are capable of being coupled to the shutter slat 1 and moving within the guide 18.
As shown in more detail in
The smooth shaft 12 may have a diameter that is greater than the diameter of the threaded shaft 14 (for example, about the diameter of the threads), in which case the smooth shaft 12 can be used as a positive stop. The smooth shaft 12 may alternatively have a diameter large enough to retain the slat 1b from slipping side to side with respect to slat 1a; for example, the smooth shaft 12 may have a diameter that is about the same as the diameter of the lip 6, in which case a lip 6 would not be needed. The length of the smooth shaft 12 may be greater than depth of the washer 9 to accommodate free rotation of the washer 9. Preferably, the smooth shaft 12 has diameter that is small enough to provide for the free movement of the washer 9 on the shaft 12. The shaft 12 may have a length to accommodate side-to-side movement of the washer 9, in order to ease displacement of the washer 9 if it comes in contact with an adjacent washer 9 when the roller shutter 20 is rolled up. This length will also accommodate the rotation while the washer 9 is fully engaged with the guide 18.
Regarding the washer 9, a linear dimension of the aperture 11 (such as a diameter or an axis of the aperture 11) may be about twice the diameter of the shaft 12 of the screw 8, as will be further explained below. Also, the linear dimension of the aperture 11 (such as a diameter or an axis of the aperture 11) may about three, four, five, or six times the diameter of the shaft 12 of the screw 8. In a preferred embodiment, the outer edge of the washer 9 has a profile that is substantially circular, and the aperture 11 has a profile that is substantially circular, and the profile of aperture 11 is substantially concentric with the profile of the outer edge of the washer 9. The outer edge of the washer 9 may be beveled (convex), as shown, so that if it happens to contact another washer 9 when the roller shutter 20 is rolled up, the washer 9 can easily slide past the contacted washer 9. Alternatively, the outer edge of the washer 9 may be flat, or even concave.
The spacer 13 may be a neoprene spacer or washer having substantially the same profile as the washer 9. The thickness of the spacer 13 may be greater than, substantially the same as, or less than, the thickness of the washer 9, depending on how much longer the shaft 12 is than the width of the washer 9. Additionally, the spacer 13 may be a spring or other resilient material or device capable of compression under a load. The spacer 13 may be located on either side of the washer 9, and is preferable located between the washer 9 and the slat 1. One purpose for the optional spacer 13 is to suppress “rattling” of the washer 9 in the guide 18 as the shutter 20 is being raised and lowered.
Referring to
The head 21 of the retention screw 8 and the washer 9 protrude from the boss receptacle 10 of the slat 1, and are able to move within the first channel 48 of the guide 18. The head 21 of the retention screw 8 retains the washer 9 to the shutter slat 1 because the head 21 of the screw 8 is wider than the aperture 11 of the washer 9. Consequently, because the outer diameter of the washer 9 is greater than the distance that separates the retention fins 46, the washer 9 is retained within the first channel 48, and the retention system 3 retains the shutter slat 1 within the guide 18.
The end retention system 3 shown in
The end retention system 3 allows the first retention fins 46, which may accommodate weather strips 40, to be the sole retention fins in the guide 18 (in other words, second retention fins 54 used in the prior art end retention system of
The end retention system 3 is well suited for use where the screw boss receptacle 10 of the slat 1 is not on the centerline of the profile of the slat 1, and therefore likely not on the centerline of the guide 18, enabling the use of the end retention system 3 with thin slats, such the illustrative slats 1. For example, in a single-walled (thin) slat such as slat 1, the screw boss receptacle 10 may be off center.
The end retention system 3 allows the washer 9 to be centered in the track 18, because the screw 8 can position itself toward one side of the aperture 11 of the washer 9. Another advantage of the end retention system 3 is that the washer 9 may rotate freely if it engages an inner side wall 45 of the guide 18 when moving up or down. Furthermore, the washer 9 of the end retention system 3 may be attached very close to, or touching, the ends 15, 16 of the slat 1, thereby reducing the likelihood of the problems described above when a moment is applied to the screw 8. The end retention system 3 is desirable because it is very simple and accommodates movement in many planes and provides free rotation of the washer 9.
Modifications in addition to those described above may be made to the structures and techniques described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, although specific embodiments have been described, these are examples only and are not limiting on the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1302093 | Shomaker | Apr 1919 | A |
3156294 | Miller et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3670797 | Sassano | Jun 1972 | A |
4732201 | Dillitzer | Mar 1988 | A |
4738296 | Hatch | Apr 1988 | A |
5068861 | Abbott et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5172742 | Iwasaki et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5377738 | Cooper | Jan 1995 | A |
5682937 | Decrane et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5839493 | Quasius | Nov 1998 | A |
6095225 | Miller | Aug 2000 | A |
6422289 | Miller | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6527037 | Daus et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6615896 | Andalia | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631749 | Zabala | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659158 | Laugenbach | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6715529 | Farooq | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755231 | Biggers | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6918343 | Kester | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6951236 | Schlater et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7100665 | Miller | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111661 | Laugenbach | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121316 | Biggers | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7357171 | Miller | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7409980 | Heissenberg | Aug 2008 | B1 |
D631171 | Konrad | Jan 2011 | S |
20030024659 | Begni | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030077932 | Lewinnek | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040226668 | Biggers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050045280 | Schlater et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050205223 | Miller | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050247246 | Kester | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070221341 | Schanz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080245489 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120055637 | Marinetti et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120090793 | Beulen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Alulux Product Description Sheet (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070277939 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |