The present invention relates to shutter slats and in particular to shutter slats of the roller type having improved resistance to storms and break-ins. It furthermore relates to shutter slats having compact retraction capability.
Conventional roller shutters are designed to provide security from break-ins or protection from storms. Because such protection and security may not always be necessary or desired, such as during the day when a retail store is open for business or during fine weather when a homeowner wishes to open windows or enjoy an ocean view, roller shutters are designed to be retractable into a casing in which they are stored. In some examples, to facilitate compact storage, the rigid shutter slats that are designed to resist hurricane winds and burglars also must be capable of conforming to a roll.
One conventional shutter slat is made to conform to a roll by providing a loose articulation between slats. Slats are slidably engaged at the upper edge of one slat and the lower edge of another slat. The upper edge comprises a vertical projection terminating in a hook-shaped profile. The lower edge comprises a first portion and a second portion that cooperate to define a vertical pocket. The hook-shaped profile of the upper edge allows the upper edge to engage the first portion of the lower edge, also having a hook-shaped profile. The upper edge is prevented from undesirably disengaging the lower edge by the second portion of the lower edge, which comprises a guard extending downward to slightly below the hook-shaped profile of the lower edge, defining a horizontal aperture between the first and second portions of the lower edge. The vertical pocket defined by the first and second portions of the lower edge is similar in depth to the height of the vertical projection of the upper edge. This shutter configuration's flexibility arises from the pivoting of the vertical portion of the upper edge within the horizontal aperture.
One result of this configuration is that the upper edge has significant vertical clearance within the vertical pocket. Shutters according to this configuration are known to have a clearance up to one-quarter inch per slat, or even more. A shutter having 48 slats and one-quarter inch clearance per slat would then have a total clearance of twelve inches between the fully open and fully closed positions. To raise such a shutter having a torsion spring as a counterbalance, a user must lift the bottom slat either by hand or mechanically to correct for the full amount of clearance before the shutter will begin to retract. In such a shutter, a user would have to lift approximately 150 pounds by twelve inches in order to engage the shutter's retraction mechanism. Shutters of this configuration do not obtain full benefit of the counterbalance, as provided by the torsion spring or by other means.
A further result of this configuration is that the loosely articulated slats are known to be noisy. The slats rattle against each other during extension and retraction. In addition, when the roller shutter is deployed, the normal forces of the wind are sufficient to cause the slats to rattle audibly.
One solution to the problem of compact storage includes integration of a boss concentric with the articulation between adjoining slats, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,095,225 to Miller, titled “Shutter Slat with Integrated Boss.” The slats in this configuration are also slidably engaged at the upper edge of one slat and the lower edge of another slat. The upper edge comprises a short vertical projection terminating in a c-shaped screw boss, and the lower edge comprises a c-shaped channel having a diameter sufficient to accommodate the upper edge. The flexibility of this shutter configuration arises from the cooperation of the rounded internal surface of the c-shaped channel and the rounded external surface of the c-shaped screw boss. The diameter of the upper edge is smaller than the diameter of the c-shaped channel, but greater than the width of the aperture defined by the c-shaped channel, preventing the upper edge from simply falling out of the c-shaped channel provided by the lower edge.
One result of this configuration is that if the exposed portion of the c-shaped channel of the lower edge gives way upon exertion of pressure on the articulation, the slats may separate undesirably. Because the retention of the upper edge by the c-shaped channel is based on a relatively small difference in size, damage to either edge may result in a breach of the rolling shutter. For example, if a putative intruder hits the shutter, the c-shaped channel may be forced open. Even if the channel is bent only slightly, once a gap is formed between an upper edge and a lower edge, the two slats may be pried apart with undesirably slight effort.
There is a need for shutter slats that completely minimize the space required for a rolling shutter made up of the slats to be wound up in a fully closed configuration. There is also a need for shutter slats that do not retain water, which can freeze and damage the slats.
The invention is a rolling shutter slat for use in a rolling shutter, said slat having a first end, a second end and a profile comprising a body having an upper edge and a lower edge, an outward facing side extending between the upper edge and the lower edge, and an inward facing side extending between the upper edge and the lower edge. The slat has engaging track connected to the body at the upper edge, the engaging track having a hook that extends upward from the upper edge at a smoothly curved transition between the engaging track and the upper edge. The slat further comprises a receiving track connected to the body at the lower edge, comprising a lip member having an outer lip surface and an articulating lip surface, the outer lip surface being contiguous with the inward facing side of the body and extending downward along the same curve as the inward facing side of the body to a curl, the curl extending upward to a tip. The receiving track further comprises a guard member spaced apart from the lip member, an articulation space wherein a second engaging track of a second identical slat may hook the lip member through an aperture between the lip member and the guard member to form a hinge, and a receptacle located between the lip member and the guard member that is separated from the articulation space by a first shoulder on the articulating lip surface and a second shoulder on the articulating guard surface, wherein the lowest point of the curl is horizontally displaced from the intersection of the second engaging track and a body of the second identical slat.
Embodiments of the invention will now be explained in further detail by way of example only with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
The distance between first end 15 and second end 16 of body portion 4 defines the overall horizontal width 55 of slat 1. The overall horizontal width 55 must be wide enough to cover a building aperture or other opening in which a rolling shutter 9 made with slats 1 is designed to protect.
Outward facing side 2 and inward facing side 3 are both formed with a radius of curvature 51. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that radius of curvature 51 is not critical so long as slat 1 is conformed to wrap around a spindle 19 (
Hook 30 of hooking track 7 has a profile that is dimensioned to be substantially similar to the profile of articulation space 20 of receiving track 8. Hook 30 may have a single radius, or the radius may change along the profile of hook 30. In the embodiment shown, the radius of hook 30 decreases closer to tip 33.
Outer surface 31 has a radius of curvature that in conjunction with the radius of curvature of inner surface 32 causes hooking track 7 to have a substantially uniform thickness 56 from tip 33 to first end 5 of body portion 4. The thickness 56 of hooking track 7 in this embodiment is substantially similar to the thickness 50 of body portion 4. Hooking track 7 also has a vertical height 57 that extends from first edge 5 to upper end 52.
Receiving track 8 has a vertical height 58 that extends from second edge 6 to lower end 53. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the vertical height 58 of receiving track 8 is not critical so long as receiving track 8 is dimensioned to engage hooking track 7.
Lip member 10 has an outer lip surface 15, an articulating lip surface 16, and a tip 25. Outer lip surface 15 further includes an outer lip wall 40 and an outer lip curl 41. Outer lip wall 40 of outer lip surface 15 is contiguous with the inward facing side 3 of body portion 4 such that the curvatures 51 of inward facing side 3 and outer lip wall 40 are the same, and there is no break between inward facing side 3 and outer lip wall 40. This common curvature 51 minimizes the space taken up by slat 1 when a rolling shutter 9 made of slats 1 is retracted into a fully closed position.
Guard member 11 has an outer guard surface 17 and an articulating guard surface 18. As shown, articulating surfaces 16 and 18 may be wholly or partially concave. Such concave articulating surfaces allow for improved articulation between adjacent slats without the need to provide additional vertical clearance.
Articulation space 20 is the space within which a hooking track 7 of an adjacent slat 1 is received in receiving track 8 to form a rolling shutter 9. The tip 25 of lip member 10 and the articulating guard surface 18 of guard member 11 define an aperture 22 communicating with articulation space 20. Hook 30 of hooking track 7 of the adjacent slat 1 is dimensioned to enter articulation space 20 through aperture 22. The profile of articulation space 20 is dimensioned to substantially match the profile of hook 30 of hooking track 7. Tip 33 of hook 30 of the adjacent slat 1 seats against articulating lip surface 16 of lip member 10, thereby forming a hinge between hooking member 7 of the adjacent slat 1 and receptacle member 8. Outer surface 31 of hook 30 of the adjacent slat 1 contacts articulating guard surface 18 of guard member 11, thereby preventing hooking member 7 of the adjacent slat 1 from disengaging with receptacle member 8.
In prior art designs, receiving tracks have thin guard members that are substantially vertical when the slat is in a vertical position. The lowest point of such a prior art guard member extends below the lowest point of the communicating lip member. Guard member 11 is considerably shorter than the guard members of prior art slats, and the lowest point of guard member 11 terminates above the lowest point of lip member 10 when slat 1 is in a vertical position. Because guard member 11 is shorter in relation to the lip member, it is thickened and reinforced at the point where it engages the hooking track 7 of the adjacent slat 1 without appreciably increasing the amount of extruded aluminum required to form receiving track 8, further increasing the security of the hinge formed by two slats without requiring additional material expense. The increased thickness of guard member 11 also protects slat 1 from excessive articulation that may disengage the hinge formed with the hooking track of another slat 1.
Receptacle 23 is adapted to receive a retention or alignment device 29 (
While receptacle 23 is a space distinct from articulation space 20 and separated by shoulders 27 and 28, as shown, receptacle 23 has a portion that is open to and in communication with articulation space 20. The hooking track 7 of an adjacent slat 1 cannot enter the gap between first shoulder 27 and second shoulder 28 and cannot be retained in receptacle 23. Although receptacle 23 is in open communication with articulation space 20, receptacle 23 is protected from the collection of dirt and grime by lip member 10 and guard member 11, and by the hooking track 7 of an adjacent slat 1. If desired, it is understood that receptacle 23 may be completely separated from articulation space 20. In such an embodiment, articulating surfaces 16 and 18 would be connected at shoulders 27 and 28 to provide a single, continuous articulating surface for the hooking track 7 of a second slat 1.
As shown in
Guard member 11 shields the connection of hooking track 7 of slat 1b with lip member 10 of slat 1a, preventing hooking track 7 of slat 1b from disengaging from receiving track 8 of slat 1a. Guard member 11 also protects hooking track 7 of slat 1b and lip member 10 of slat 1a from exposure to forces applied to the outward facing sides 2 of slats 1a and b. In the open position, the weight bearing portion of receiving track 8 is lip member 10. Because hooking track 7 of slat 1b does not bear directly upon guard member 11 of slat 1a, damage to the outward facing side 2 of slat 1a, and to guard member 11 of slat 1a, is less likely to disengage the articulation between slats 1a and 2b than in prior art shutters in which an exposed portion of the lower track was weight bearing.
One advantage to the design of lip member 10 and guard member 11 is that slats 1a and 1b do not retain water in the hinge formed by hooking track 7 of slat 1b and receiving track 8 of slat 1a. Lip member 10 of slat 1a, at its lowest point, is horizontally displaced from the intersection of body portion 4 and hooking track 7 of slat 1b. The intersection of body portion 4 and hooking track 7 of slat 1b is a smooth transition. This design allows water to flow cleanly from lip member 10 of slat 1a without draining into the hinge formed by the intersection of slats 1a and 1b.
Slat 1 does not require a protrusion to prevent excessive articulation. With slat 1, guard member 11 is thickened in comparison to prior art slats. The thickness of guard member 11 and the shape of lip member 10 prevent slat 1 from excessive articulation, and there is no need for a protrusion on hooking member 7. Without a protrusion, there is no channel to retain water that drips off lip member 10. If water were to be retained, it could freeze and damage the hinge.
The shape of guard member 11 further minimizes the overall radius of a rolling shutter 9 of slats 1 when the shutter is in a closed position. As set out above, guard member 11 is shorter and thicker than prior art slats, and the lowest point of guard member 11 is above the lowest point of lip member 10 when slat 1 is in a vertical position. As shown in
Modifications in addition to those described above may be made to the structures and techniques described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, although specific embodiments have been described, these are examples only and are not limiting on the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
638314 | Blades | Dec 1899 | A |
845526 | Collins | Feb 1907 | A |
876593 | Rush | Jan 1908 | A |
1014315 | McCloud | Jan 1912 | A |
1352656 | Cahill | Sep 1920 | A |
1579839 | Raper | Apr 1926 | A |
1776119 | Johnson | Sep 1930 | A |
1892570 | Ginder | Dec 1932 | A |
1918415 | Miller | Jul 1933 | A |
2350287 | Michelman | May 1944 | A |
2495963 | Greegor | Jan 1950 | A |
2545400 | White | Mar 1951 | A |
2812813 | Zarnowski | Nov 1957 | A |
2858883 | Rapin | Nov 1958 | A |
3292685 | Clark | Dec 1966 | A |
3431964 | Rogers | Mar 1969 | A |
3489200 | Recchione | Jan 1970 | A |
3670797 | Sassano | Jun 1972 | A |
4037639 | Jones | Jul 1977 | A |
4294302 | Ricke, Sr. | Oct 1981 | A |
4332287 | Stolpe | Jun 1982 | A |
4343340 | Paule | Aug 1982 | A |
4345635 | Solomon | Aug 1982 | A |
4379479 | Whiting | Apr 1983 | A |
4386645 | Dever et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4519434 | Forquer | May 1985 | A |
4611848 | Romano | Sep 1986 | A |
4628982 | Labelle | Dec 1986 | A |
4690193 | Morrison et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718472 | Hormann | Jan 1988 | A |
4723588 | Ruppel | Feb 1988 | A |
4738296 | Hatch | Apr 1988 | A |
4795206 | Adams | Jan 1989 | A |
4807687 | Finch et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4929862 | Hamilton et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930563 | Finch et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5070925 | Paule | Dec 1991 | A |
5154468 | Teigen et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165746 | Teigen | Nov 1992 | A |
5204147 | Schneider | Apr 1993 | A |
5209281 | Kraeutler | May 1993 | A |
5253694 | Bernardo | Oct 1993 | A |
5265663 | Munekata et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5343924 | Hoffman | Sep 1994 | A |
5365990 | Ueda | Nov 1994 | A |
5372175 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377738 | Cooper | Jan 1995 | A |
5426893 | Hoffman | Jun 1995 | A |
5469905 | McKinney et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482104 | Lichy | Jan 1996 | A |
5575322 | Miller | Nov 1996 | A |
5586592 | McGregor | Dec 1996 | A |
5601130 | Werner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611383 | Hoffman | Mar 1997 | A |
5613539 | Kraler | Mar 1997 | A |
5657805 | Magro | Aug 1997 | A |
5682937 | Decrane et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5839493 | Quasius | Nov 1998 | A |
5850862 | Miller | Dec 1998 | A |
5996669 | Miller | Dec 1999 | A |
6085822 | Miller | Jul 2000 | A |
6095225 | Miller | Aug 2000 | A |
6422289 | Miller | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6631749 | Zabala | Oct 2003 | B1 |
7357171 | Miller | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7784522 | Miller | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20070006980 | Zabala et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070137802 | Lukasik et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080202700 | Miller | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110162807 | Miller | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140053990 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61600909 | Feb 2012 | US |