Side entry E-plane probe waveguide to microstrip transition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6486748
  • Patent Number
    6,486,748
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 24, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 26, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A waveguide-to-microstrip transition (30) for converting and directing electromagnetic wave signals to an electronic signal processing component (53). A waveguide (32) directs the signals to a waveguide input and is received by a probe (36). A bent microstrip line (40A) which is connected to the probe (36) directs the received signals from the probe (36) to the electronic signal processing component (53). An output port (43) provides a connection between the bent microstrip line (40A) and the electronic signal processing component (53). The output port (43) is not inline with respect to the probe (36), but the microstrip line (40A) includes a bend so as to direct the received signals from the probe (36) to the output port (43).
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention is generally related to monolithic microwave/millimeter waveguide devices and more particularly to packaging waveguide-to-microstrip transitions for microwave/millimeter waveguide devices.




2. Discussion




In the past, several waveguide-to-microstrip design methodologies have been proposed in an effort to introduce an efficient transition from waveguide to microstrip. The need for such a transition is prompted by the numerous applications it has in present mm-wave (mmW) and microwave/millimeter wave integrated circuit (MMIC) technologies. The increased use of low-cost MMIC components such as low-noise and power amplifiers, in both military and commercial systems continues to drive the search for more affordable and package-integrable transitions.




The current method of signal reception and power transmission within the mmW system is the rectangular waveguide which has a relatively low insertion loss and high power handling capability. In order to keep the overall package cost to a minimum, there is a need for a transition which is mechanically simple and easily integrated into the housing while maintaining an acceptable level of performance.




Current designs have used transitions which were based on stepped ridged waveguides as discussed, for example, in: S. S. Moochalla and C. An, “


Ridge Waveguide Used in Microstrip Transition


”, Microwaves and RF, March 1984; and W. Menzel and A. Klaassen, “


On the Transition from Ridged Waveguide to Microstrip


”, Proc. 19th European Microwave Conf., pp. 1265-1269, 1989. Other designs used antipodal finlines which were discussed, for example, in: L. J. Lavedan, “


Design of Waveguide


-


to


-


Microstrip Transitions Specially Suited to Millimeter-Wave Applications


”, Electronic Letters, vol. 13, No. 20, pp. 604-605, September 1997.




Moreover, current designs have used probe coupling which was discussed, for example, in: T. Q. Ho and Y. Shih, “


Spectral


-


Domain Analysis of E


-


Plane Waveguide to Microstrip Transitions


”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 37, pp. 388-392, Febuary 1989; and D. I. Stones,


“Analysis of a Novel Microstrip


-


to


-


Waveguide Transition/Combiner


”, IEEE MTT-S Int'l Symposium Digest, San Diego, Calif., vol. 1, pp. 217-220, 1994.




These current designs suffer from such disadvantages as varying degrees of mechanical complexity. Some of the current transitions are bulky and use several independent pieces that must be assembled in various steps. Additionally, they may require more than one substrate material with multilevel conductors and high-tolerance machining of background housing components such as waveguide steps/tapers, or precise positioning of a backshort. Such precise positioning requirements produce extensive bench tuning after fabrication. Also, current designs require a separate waveguide window and several hermetic sealing process steps to achieve hermetic sealing of the component. These disadvantages render current designs expensive and difficult to integrate into the package.




Additionally, current designs include probes which sample a waveguide signal within a waveguide cavity by either sampling in the E-Plane of the H-Plane direction of propagation. However, these probes limit the placement of connecting microwave hardware to be inline with the probe direction. Such an approach limits the where the output port is located within the component.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A waveguide-to-microstrip transition for processing electromagnetic wave signals includes a waveguide for directing the signals to a waveguide input. A substrate covers the waveguide input and is hermetically sealed to the waveguide. A probe on the substrate overlies the waveguide input.




In another embodiment, the waveguide-to-microstrip transition includes an iris connected to the substrate for substantially matching the impedance between the probe and a microstrip line.




In still another embodiment, a microstrip line includes a bend so as to direct signals from a probe to a side output port which is not substantially inline with the probe.




Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic perspective of the waveguide-to-microstrip transition;





FIG. 2

is a diagrammatic perspective of the waveguide-to-microstrip transition wherein the internal portions of the package are revealed;





FIG. 3

is an exploded perspective view of the waveguide-to-microstrip transition of the present invention;





FIG. 4A

is a top view of the waveguide-to-microstrip transition showing the network topology;





FIG. 4B

is a side view of the waveguide-to-microstrip transition depicting the waveguide and cavity dimensions;





FIG. 5

is a Smith chart used to determine the W-band dimensions for the iris;





FIG. 6

is an X-Y graph illustrating the predicted results of the Q-band transition;





FIG. 7

is an X-Y graph showing the measured data of two back-to-back Q-band transitions;





FIG. 8

is an X-Y graph showing the predicted results of the W-band transition;





FIG. 9

is an X-Y graph showing the measured data of two back-to-back W-band transitions; and





FIG. 10

is a diagrammatic perspective of an alternate embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 11

is a bottom-view of the alternate embodiment of

FIG. 10

;





FIG. 12

is an X-Y graph depicting the reflection characteristics of the alternate embodiment of

FIG. 10

; and





FIG. 13

is an X-Y graph depicting the insertion loss characteristics of the alternate embodiment of FIG.


10


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In the discussion of the embodiments below, like reference numerals represent like elements throughout the figures. Referring to

FIG. 1

, a waveguide-to-microstrip transition package is generally shown at


30


. The opening of waveguide


32


allows electromagnetic millimeter/microwave signals to reach substrate


34


. A probe


36


is etched onto the top of substrate


34


. Probe


36


terminates with a first stub


38


. Transition


39


indicates where probe


36


transitions into a microstrip line


40


. Microstrip line


40


has a second stub


42


and a third stub


44


; both stubs can be either an open or a shorted element. Above substrate


34


is a cavity


46


, and below substrate


34


is an iris


48


.





FIG. 2

shows the package


30


with its internal structure revealed. A ring frame


50


which is placed on top of base


52


defines cavity


46


. Probe


36


which is etched on the backside of substrate


34


eliminates the need for separate assembly steps for the substrate-to-probe adhesion. The etching can be done by a photolithographic or other such process known in the art. Substrate


34


is self-aligning as indicated at location


54


which is advantageous particularly for applications requiring tight tolerances such as W-band packaging applications.




Substrate


34


overlaps waveguide input


63


which makes a natural hermetic seal as indicated at location


56


. Iris


48


on waveguide input


63


provides matching between probe


36


and waveguide input


63


as shown at location


58


. In addition, iris


48


allows the formation of a cavity


46


above the probe


36


, resulting in the backshort length to be a less critical dimension. Location


59


depicts the elimination of glass-to-metal seal contact to substrate.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, package


30


is constructed in three parts which has the decided advantage of a lower assembly cost. A cover


60


is placed upon ring frame


50


. Cover


60


provides the covering for both the RF components of package


30


as well as for the backshort for transition


39


. An opening


61


is provided for the waveguide. Moreover, a trough


62


allows substrate


34


to be accurately aligned with base


52


. Substrate


34


is eutectically soldered or epoxied to base


52


for a hermetic seal. A second substrate


64


with the same configuration as substrate


34


is shown.




Optimal coupling of RF power to and from package


30


is accomplished by making use of available iris resonances due to excited higher-order modes and the terminating of the microstrip line


40


in a short circuit at the edge of iris


48


(of

FIG. 2

) using first stub


38


. Thus, the need for high-tolerance backshort positioning is obviated. Impedance matching to the microstrip port


69


is accomplished using microstrip line


40


, second stub


42


and third stub


44


; rendering a very low-profile design. In this context, a very low-profile design indicates a planar microstrip design versus other designs such as ridged waveguide, or waveguides/coaxial/microstrip transitions.




Ring frame


50


encloses transition


39


with the exception of the opening for the microstrip line


40


. Ring frame


50


which provides the perimeter for cavity


46


is assembled along with substrate


34


in one step. Another feature of transition


39


is that cover


60


is an integral part of package


30


, and can be laser-welded in place, thus making transition


39


a fully integrated part of package


30


requiring no special assembly steps. These features render transition


39


to be very low-cost and readily integrable into typical microwave and mmW multi-chip assembly (MCA) packages.




In the preferred embodiment: substrate


34


is composed of alumina; with etched gold probe


36


and etched gold iris


48


; ring frame


50


is a composition of Alloy


48


and


46


; base


52


is of composition of AlSiC (cast) and CuMo (stamped) corresponding respectively. However, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to only those compositions referenced above, but includes other materials which produce similar results. For example, substrate


34


may also have the following compositions (but is not limited to): fused silica, Duroid (RT/duriod), or z-cut quartz.




Referring to

FIG. 4A

, microstrip line


40


is situated along the E-plane of the waveguide, and is terminated in a short structure (i.e., first stub


38


) coincident with edge


66


of iris


48


and connects to the main microstrip line (not shown). This ensures a zero voltage condition at edge


66


, and in turn, maximum voltage across the opening of iris


48


and RF coupling to the signal transmitting line. Preferably, first stub


38


is a ninety degree stub. The probe


36


, the stubs (


38


,


44


,


42


) and iris (


48


) are patterns formed from etching of gold metallization of both sides of the substrate


34


.




The choice of iris height


67


(H


iris


) and iris width


68


(W


iris


) determines the upper bound for the bandwidth of the transition. Iris


48


was modeled as a shunt circuit, where the equivalent circuit parameters model the storage of susceptive energy caused by the non-propagating higher-order modes excited at the discontinuity. These shunt parameters are determined using a variational method such as that described in R. E. Collin,


Field Theory of Guided Waves,


McGraw-Hill, New York, ch. 8, 1960. Because of this total admittance, iris


48


has resonances of its own which can in turn be used to broaden the bandwidth of the transition (see, L. Hyvonen and A. Hujanen,


“A Compact MMIC


-


Compatible Microstrip to Waveguide Transition


”, IEEE MTT-S Int'l Symposium Digest, San Francisco, Calif., vol. 2, pp. 875-878, 1996.




The optimal choice of dimensions of iris


48


is accomplished using a 3D electromagnetic simulator based on Finite Element Method (FEM), such as Ansoft's Maxwell Eminence or Hewlett-Packard's HFSS.




Matching of the impedance presented by iris


48


to the microstrip is port


69


is accomplished by using two symmetrical shunt lines


72


and


74


which are short-circuited using second and third stubs (


42


and


44


). Shunt lines


72


and


74


are a predetermined distance


70


(L


1


) away from edge


65


. This distance is chosen so that at point a:







Y




a




=Y




0




+jB




a′


  (EQ1)




where Y


0


is the characteristic admittance of the microstrip line


40


. The lengths of shunt lines


72


and


74


(L


2


) are chosen such that they each present:









j




B
a

2



[
mhos
]






(

EQ





2

)













to microstrip line


40


at f


0


, where B


a


is the susceptance from (EQ 1). The use of two symmetrical shunt lines


72


and


74


in parallel assist in keeping the response broadband due to the higher series reactance seen by microstrip line


40


:










X
a

=



2

B
a




[
ohms
]


.





(

EQ





3

)













In alternate embodiments, fine tuning of the response with respect to f


0


is implemented by varying W


iris




68


accordingly.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, the input impedance referenced to the near edge of the iris is plotted on a Smith Chart parametrically as a family of curves for each H


iris


as a function of W


iris


, Z


in


(W


iris


)(H


iris


. For the W-band design, choosing a curve with the least variation in Z


in


(W


iris


)H


iris


is equivalent to choosing the iris dimensions that will afford the broadest bandwidth for the matched transition.




Curve


100


depicts the following three points which pair H


iris


with W


iris


: (20.0 mils, 70 mils); (20.0 mils, 80 mils); and (20.0 mils, 90 mils). Curve


102


depicts the following three points which pair H


iris


with W


iris


: (25.0 mils, 70 mils); (25.0 mils, 80 mils); and (25.0 mils, 90 mils). Curve


104


depicts the following three points which pair H


iris


with W


iris


: (27.5 mils, 70 mils); (27.5 mils, 80 mils); and (27.5 mils, 90 mils). Curve


106


depicts the following three points which pair H


iris


with W


iris


: (30.0 mils, 70 mils); (30.0 mils, 80 mils); and (30.0 mils, 90 mils). Curve


106


exhibits at H


iris


equal to 30.0 mils the least variation as a function of W


iris


. When the iris is implemented with an H


iris


of 30.0 mils and an W


iris


of 80 mils, the present is invention provides for broadband performance.




Referring to

FIG. 4B

, the dimensions of cavity


46


(i.e., cavity height (H


c


)


78


and cavity width (W


c


)


80


) are selected such that its modal resonances are not too close to the operating frequency. Usually, resonances are chosen such that:









&LeftBracketingBar;



f
o



f
resi



f
o


&RightBracketingBar;


0.1

;

i
=
1


,
2










where f


0


is the center operating frequency, and the f


resi


are the two closest resonances bounding the center frequency. Because of the relative isolation of cavity


46


from waveguide


32


due to iris


48


, the present invention has the distinct advantage that the exact height of the backshort (i.e. H


c




78


) is not crucial to the electrical performance of the transition.




A Q-band design on 5 mil alumina (E


r


=9.9), and a W-band design on 5 mil z-cut quartz (E


r


=4.7) are discussed below. Models of these two designs were simulated using 3D FEM simulators, employing a relatively strict convergence criteria. S-parameter measurements of the transitions were facilitated by employing two identical transitions fixed in a back-to-back arrangement (as shown for example in

FIG. 3

, where the two transitions would be connected through a 50 ohm microstrip line, rather than the active MMIC devices shown). The transitions are connected using a 50 Ohm microstrip line, 955 mils long for the Q-band fixture and 830 mils long for the W-band fixture, to allow the distinct characterization of the transitions without any interactive effects.





FIG. 6

shows the theoretical values of:




|S


11


|


db


(Reference


90


)|S


22


|


db


db (Reference


92


) and




|S


21


|


db


(Reference


94


)




for the Q-band transition. Indicator


108


indicates that curves


110


and


112


use the leftmost ordinate values. Reference


90


which is curve


110


represents the reflection coefficient from the waveguide; reference


92


which is curve


112


represents the reflection coefficient from the microstrip line; and reference


94


which is curve


116


represents the transmission characteristics. Indicator


114


indicates that curve


116


uses the rightmost ordinate values. Theoretical dielectric and planar conductor losses are accounted for in the model simulation. The frequency rate is approximately in the 44 GHz region. For a 15 dB return loss, a bandwidth greater than 10% is predicted. The insertion loss of the transition throughout the band of interest is ˜0.35 dB.





FIG. 7

shows the Q-band measured data of two back-to-back transitions obtained on an automated network analyzer (ANA). The measured results corresponding to one transition can be determined from the back-to-back transitions data. Curve


118


represents the insertion loss. Curve


120


represents reflection coefficient. The curve


118


is identified by the values on the right vertical axis and the curve


120


is identified by the values on the left vertical axis. By accounting for the microstrip fine and test fixture losses based on separate measurements (1.8 dB/in and 0.2 dB, respectively, at 44 GHz), the return and insertion losses of one transition can be calculated. A 10% bandwidth is deduced for a 15 dB return loss, and the insertion loss per transition is found to be less than 0.3 dB. Around the center of the band, a return loss better than 22 dB has been obtained.





FIG. 8

shows the theoretical values for the W-band transition including loss. Curve


122


represents the insertion loss response. Curve


124


represents the output reflection coefficient. Curve


126


represents the input reflection coefficient. The curve


122


is identified by the values on the right vertical axis and the curves


124


and


126


are identified by the values on the left vertical axis. The frequency rate is approximately in the 94 GHz region. For a 15 dB return loss bandwidth, an insertion loss better than 0.35 dB can be achieved. The W-band design was implemented on a lower permittivity substrate (z-cut quartz) for bandwidth considerations. The higher overall circuit Q in this frequency band leads to a narrower response than that at Q-band. The higher overall circuit Q in this frequency band leads to a narrower response than that at Q-band.





FIG. 9

shows the W-band back-to-back transitions measured data. Curve


128


represents insertion loss. Curve


130


represents input reflection coefficient. The curve


128


is identified by the values on the right vertical axis and the curve


130


is identified by the values on the left vertical axis. From these, the frequency response of the transitions exhibits a relatively wider and flatter bandwidth than that shown in

FIG. 8. A

12% bandwidth with a 15 dB return loss can be deduced. The insertion loss is found to be less than 0.2 dB per transition, using a value of 1.61 dB/in for the microstrip line and test fixture losses at 94 GHz.





FIG. 10

depicts an alternate embodiment of the present invention wherein waveguide-to-microstrip transition package


30


includes a bent microstrip line


40


A. Bent microstrip line


40


A allows signals to be directed to an output port


43


which is not substantially inline (i.e., offset) with axis


41


of probe


36


. Output port has an axis


47


which is not inline with axis


41


. In this respect, axis


47


is at an angle other than 180 degrees. Preferably, axis


47


is at approximately a right angle (i.e., approximately 90 degrees) with respect to axis


41


.




In this embodiment, probe


36


on substrate


34


with iris


48


collects the incoming signals from the waveguide opening


32


in the E-Plane direction of propagation. Microstrip line


40


A has an angled bend with a short circuit stub


42


, such as a radial stub, to provide signal matching which changes the signal direction. Radial stub


42


is modified so that the impedance between the probe and the microstrip line is substantially matched.




It should be appreciated that the present invention is not limited to a microstrip line with a bend of approximately 90 degrees, but includes bends of whatever angle is needed in order to provide the redirection of signals to the output port. Moreover, the present invention includes the waveguide being in a shape other than rectangular, such as, but not limited to, a circular shape.




Additionally, the present invention includes, but is not limited to, the advantage of a size reduction since the redirection to the side output port is being performed within the transition itself.




The non-limiting example of

FIG. 10

illustrates the change in signal direction from inline to a side output port


43


. The side output port


43


serves as an outlet for directing the signal from the microstrip line


40


A to electronic wave processing hardware. Such electronic wave processing hardware (e.g., RF components) is shown, for example, in

FIG. 3

at reference numeral


53


.




The present invention includes the alternate embodiment with a bent microstrip line


40


A being utilized within the system depicted in

FIG. 3

where, for example, cover


60


of

FIG. 3

provides the covering for both the RF components of package


30


as well as the backshort for transition


39


. Moreover, the present invention includes the alternate embodiment, being utilized with trough


62


(of

FIG. 3

) which allows substrate


34


to be accurately aligned with base


52


.





FIG. 11

depicts the preferred embodiment for the geometric characteristics of the alternate embodiment for the bent microstrip line


40


A. The dimensions are in units of mils (i.e., thousandths of an inch). Particularly, the iris


48


has a length of 168 mils and a width of 50 mils, and the substrate


34


has a length of 200 mils and a width of 100 mils. It is to be understood that while these dimensions are the preferred dimensions, the present invention is not limited to these dimensions since the dimensions are subject to change based upon the particular application.





FIGS. 12 and 13

graphically depict the simulated theoretical values for the alternate embodiment for operation in the frequency range of 34.0-44.0 GHz. Within the exemplary graphical results of

FIGS. 12 and 13

, the present invention was utilized within a system whose design frequency was approximately 38-39 GHz.




S curve


140


represents the output reflection coefficient (i.e., reflection from the waveguide). S curve


142


represents the input reflection coefficient (i.e., reflection from the microstrip line). Point


143


on

FIG. 12

depicts that at approximately 40 GHz, the reflection is at approximately −29 dB (i.e., relatively little reflection which results in higher amount of incident power being conducted through the microstrip line). With reference to

FIG. 13

, S curve


144


represents the insertion loss response. These graphical results are shown in the following table:























S[1,1]





S[2,2]





S[1,2]






Frequency




S[1,1]




Ang




S[2,2]




Ang




S[1,2]




Ang






GHz




Mag




deg




Mag




deg




dB




deg





























34.000000000




0.5410




108.7709




0.5410




65.5533




−1.5038




177.1621






35.000000000




0.3452




97.3707




0.3452




38.7942




−0.5510




158.0825






36.000000000




0.1878




97.1521




0.1878




3.5057




−0.1559




140.3290






37.000000000




0.1083




116.1758




0.1083




−47.0908




−0.0512




124.5425






38.000000000




0.0851




133.0327




0.0851




−92.5847




−0.0316




110.2239






39.000000000




0.0536




122.7337




0.0536




−109.7834




−0.0125




96.4751






40.000000000




0.0396




13.2710




0.0396




−28.3049




−0.0068




82.4830






41.000000000




0.1436




−31.1052




0.1436




−13.4411




−0.0905




67.7268






42.000000000




0.2835




−48.5364




0.2835




−27.5465




−0.3639




51.9585






43.000000000




0.4874




−71.9448




0.4874




−19.5502




−1.1777




44.2525






44.000000000




0.5878




−78.9184




0.5878




−55.9906




−1.8410




22.5455














The embodiments which have been set forth above were for the purpose of illustration and were not intended to limit the invention. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made to the embodiments discussed in the specification without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, the present invention also includes the probe being in the shape of a wedge instead of being in a linear shape.



Claims
  • 1. A waveguide-to-microstrip transition for converting and directing electromagnetic wave signals to a signal processing component, comprising:a waveguide for directing said electromagnetic wave signals to a waveguide input; a substrate positioned on the waveguide and including an iris; a probe formed on the substrate for receiving said directed electromagnetic wave signal, said probe including a widened shorting stub portion and an elongated portion, said shorting stub portion being connected at one end of the elongated portion, said shorting stub portion being mounted on the substrate and said elongated portion extending across the iris; a bent microstrip line connected to said probe for directing said received electromagnetic wave signals from said probe to said electronic signal processing component, and a first stub and second stub being disposed on a substrate; whereby said first and second stubs have been short-circuited for substantially matching an impedance of said probe and an impedance of said bent microstrip line, an output port for providing a connection between said bent microstrip line and said electronic signal processing component, said output port not being inline with respect to the probe, said probe transitioning into said bent microstrip line along a first axis, said output port having a second axis which is at an angle other than 180 degrees from said first axis, said bent microstrip line including a bend so as to direct said received signals along the first axis of said probe to the second axis of said output port.
  • 2. A waveguid-to-microstrip transition for converting and directing electromagnetic wave signals to an electronic signal processing component, comprising:a waveguide for directing said electromagnetic wave signals to a waveguide input; a substrate positioned on the waveguide and including an iris; a probe formed on the substrate for receiving said directed electromagnetic wave signals, said probe including a widened shortinq stub portion and an elongated portion, said shorting stub portion being connected at one end of the elongated portion, said shorting stub portion being mounted on the substrate and said elongated portion extending across the iris; a bent microstrip line connected to an end of the elongated portion of said probe opposite the shorting stub for directing said received electromagnefic wave signals from said probe to said electronic signal processing component, and an output port for providing a connection between said bent microstrip line and said electronic signal processing component, said output port being offset with respect to the probe, said bent microstrip line including a bend so as to direct said received electromagnetic wave signals from said probe to said output port, wherein said probe transitions into said bent microstrip line along a first axis, said output port having a second axis which is at an angle other than 180 degrees from said first axis, said bent microstrip line directing said received signals along the first axis of said probe to the second axis of said output port.
  • 3. The transition according to claim 1, said transition further comprising:a first stub and second stub being disposed on said substrate proximate the bent microstrip line; whereby said first and second stubs provide for matching an impedance of said probe and an impedance of said bent microstrip line.
  • 4. The transition according claim 2 wherein said substrate is hermetically sealed to said waveguide.
  • 5. The transition according to claim 4 wherein said transition is incorporated into a package and wherein the electronic signal processing component includes components selected from the group consisting of radio frequency components, microwave frequency components, or millimeter frequency components.
  • 6. The transition according to claim 5 wherein the electronic signal processing component includes at least one integrated circuit chip for processing said electromagnetic wave signals from said probe.
  • 7. The transition according to claim 4 further comprising:a base, wherein said substrate is eutectically soldered to said base thereby providing said hermetic seal with said base.
  • 8. The transition according to claim 4 further comprising:a base having a trough surrounding said waveguide input, said substrate being insertable into said trough thereby providing said hermetic seal between said base and said substrate.
  • 9. The transition according to claim 8 wherein said substrate is eutectically soldered to said base to provide said hermetic seal with said base.
  • 10. The transition according to claim 4 wherein said probe is etched onto said substrate.
  • 11. The transition according to claim 4 further comprising:a frame connected to said substrate, said frame defining a cavity which contains said probe; and a cover which is fastened onto said frame, said cover providing both a backshort and a seal for said transition.
  • 12. The transition according to claim 10 wherein said substrate overlaps said waveguide input thereby providing said hermetic seal.
  • 13. The transition according to claim 11 wherein the iris is substantially disposed in said cavity for substantially matching the impedance of said probe and the impedance of said bent microstrip line.
  • 14. The transition according to claim 13 further comprising:a first stub and second stub disposed on said substrate proximate the bent microstrip line; whereby said first and second stubs providing for matching the impedance of said probe and the impedance of said bent microstrip line.
  • 15. The transition according to claim 14 wherein said substrate has a first side and a second side, said probe being etched onto the first side of said substrate, said iris being appended onto the second side of said substrate.
US Referenced Citations (18)
Number Name Date Kind
4453142 Murphy Jun 1984 A
4550296 Ehrlinger et al. Oct 1985 A
4851794 Williams et al. Jul 1989 A
5198786 Russell et al. Mar 1993 A
5202648 McCandless Apr 1993 A
5235300 Chan et al. Aug 1993 A
5319329 Shiau et al. Jun 1994 A
5396202 Scheck Mar 1995 A
5414394 Gamand et al. May 1995 A
5440279 Kinoshita et al. Aug 1995 A
5539361 Davidovitz Jul 1996 A
5559480 Ivanivsky Sep 1996 A
5585768 Wei Dec 1996 A
5600286 Livingston et al. Feb 1997 A
5726664 Park et al. Mar 1998 A
5912598 Stones et al. Jun 1999 A
5982250 Hung et al. Nov 1999 A
6028497 Allen et al. Feb 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
49003 Mar 1984 JP
77403 Apr 1986 JP
405335815 Dec 1993 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
S.S. Moochalla, C. An, “Ridge Waveguide Used in Microstrip Transition”, Microwaves and RF, Mar. 1984.
W. Menzel and A. Klaassen, “On the Transition from Ridged Waveguide to Microstrip”, Proc. 19th European Microwave Conf., pp. 1265-1269, 1989.
L.J. Lavedan, “Design of Waveguide-to-Microstrip Transitions Specially Suited to Millimetre-Wave Applications”, Electronic Letters, vol. 13, No. 20, pp. 604-605, Sep. 1977.
T.Q. Ho and Y. Shih, “Spectral-Domain Analysis of E-Plane Waveguide to Microstrip Transitions”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 37, pp. 388-392, Feb. 1989.
D.I. Stones, “Analysis of a Novel Microstrip-to-Waveguide Transition/Combiner”, IEEE MTT-S Int'l Symposium Digest, San Diego, Ca, vol. 1, pp. 217-220, 1994.
B.N. Das, K.V.S.V.R. Prasad, and S. Rao, “Excitation of Waveguide by Stripline- and Microstrip-Line-Fed Slots”, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 34, pp. 321-327, Mar. 1986.
R.E. Collin, “Field Theory of Guided Waves”, McGraw-Hill, New York, ch. 8, 1960.
L. Hyvonen and A. Hujanen, “A Compact MMIC-Compatible Microstrip to Waveguide Transition”, IEEE MTT-S Int's Symposium Digest, San Francisco, Ca, vol. 2, pp. 875-878, 1996.