This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/328,107, filed Apr. 26, 2010 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/328,125, filed Apr. 26, 2010, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates generally to displaying data, and more particularly to configurable user interface displays for use with data accessible via an on-demand database and/or application service.
In current display technologies for displaying database objects, a user is often provided with a set display of pre-selected fields for a displayed object or record. The displayed set of fields is typically set by an administrative user. An end user may have some flexibility in adjusting the display, but generally this is limited to selecting, on a recurring basis, which fields may be displayed. In general there are no mechanisms that allow a user to specify object display highlighting characteristics such as which fields are to be displayed, and in which order, in a prominent manner.
It is desirable to provide systems and methods that allow for personalized highlighting of certain selected object fields in a consistent and persistent, yet adjustable, manner.
The present invention relates generally to displaying data. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relates to user interface displays, and to configurable user interface displays using side tab navigation tools for use with data accessible via an on-demand database and/or application service. In various embodiments, methods for practicing techniques of the present invention, systems having elements or components configured to implement techniques of the present invention, devices, and computer-readable storage media storing executable code and/or instructions are disclosed.
According to one embodiment, a computer-implemented method is provided for displaying tab elements representing viewable page elements. The method typically includes displaying a set of one or more main tabs on a first portion of a display, each main tab defining a link to a database object stored in a database, receiving a user selection of a first one of the main tabs (e.g., to determine which tab provides default display), and displaying two or more side tabs in a first, default order on a second portion of the display, each said side tab defining a link to an element or portion of a first object. The method also typically includes receiving a user selection of a new order for the two or more side tabs, and thereafter displaying the two or more side tabs in said new order, and storing said new order to the database, wherein upon later access of the first object by the user, the two or more side tabs are automatically displayed in said new order.
According to another embodiment, a tangible computer readable medium is provided that stores code, which when executed by one or more processors causes the processor(s) to display a set of one or more main tabs on a first portion of a display, each main tab defining a link to a database object stored in a database, receive a user selection of a first one of the main tabs, and display two or more side tabs in a first, default order on a second portion of the display, each said side tab defining a link to an element or portion of a first object. The code also typically causes the processor to receive a user selection of a new order for the two or more side tabs, and thereafter display the two or more side tabs in said new order, and store said new order to the database, wherein upon later access of the first object by the user, the two or more side tabs are automatically displayed in said new order.
According to yet another embodiment, a database system is provided that typically includes a database that stores database objects, and a computer system communicably coupled to the database, the computer system including a memory that stores code. When executed by a processor of the computer system, the code causes the processor to display a set of one or more main tabs on a first portion of a display, each main tab defining a link to a database object stored in the database, receive a user selection of a first one of the main tabs, and display two or more side tabs in a first, default order on a second portion of the display, each said side tab defining a link to an element or portion of a first object. The code also typically causes the processor to receive a user selection of a new order for the two or more side tabs, and thereafter display the two or more side tabs in said new order, and store said new order to the database, wherein upon later access of the first object by the user, the two or more side tabs are automatically displayed in said new order.
Reference to the remaining portions of the specification, including the drawings and claims, will realize other features and advantages of the present invention. Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with respect to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples of the invention, the invention is not limited to the examples depicted in the figures.
a illustrates an example of a side tab navigation tool on User Interface page according to one embodiment.
b shows that the Feed side tab is selected and information regarding opportunity feeds is displayed in a region of the UI page.
c shows that the Recommendations side tab is selected and information regarding recommendations is displayed in a region of the UI page
The present invention provides systems and methods for displaying data, and more particularly configurable user interface displays using side tab navigation tools for use with displaying data accessible via an on-demand multi-tenant database and/or application service.
As used herein, the term multi-tenant database system refers to those systems in which various elements of hardware and software of the database system may be shared by one or more customers. For example, a given application server (e.g. running an application process) may simultaneously process requests for a great number of customers, and a given database table may store rows for a potentially much greater number of customers. As used herein, the term query plan refers to a set of steps used to access information in a database system.
System Overview
Environment 10 is an environment in which an on-demand database service exists. User system 12 may be any machine or system that is used by a user to access a database user system. For example, any of user systems 12 can be a handheld computing device, a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network of computing devices. As illustrated in
An on-demand database service, such as system 16, is a database system that is made available to outside users that do not need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system, but instead may be available for their use when the users need the database system (e.g., on the demand of the users). Some on-demand database services may store information from one or more tenants stored into tables of a common database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS). Accordingly, “on-demand database service 16” and “system 16” will be used interchangeably herein. A database image may include one or more database objects. A relational database management system (RDMS) or the equivalent may execute storage and retrieval of information against the database object(s). Application platform 18 may be a framework that allows the applications of system 16 to run, such as the hardware and/or software, e.g., the operating system. In an embodiment, on-demand database service 16 may include an application platform 18 that enables creation, managing and executing one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand database service, users accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 12, or third party application developers accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 12.
The users of user systems 12 may differ in their respective capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 12 might be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a particular user system 12 to interact with system 16, that user system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However, while an administrator is using that user system to interact with system 16, that user system has the capacities allotted to that administrator. In systems with a hierarchical role model, users at one permission level may have access to applications, data, and database information accessible by a lower permission level user, but may not have access to certain applications, database information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with regard to accessing and modifying application and database information, depending on a user's security or permission level.
Network 14 is any network or combination of networks of devices that communicate with one another. For example, network 14 can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network), WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network, point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub network, or other appropriate configuration. As the most common type of computer network in current use is a TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol) network, such as the global internetwork of networks often referred to as the “Internet” with a capital “I,” that network will be used in many of the examples herein. However, it should be understood that the networks that the present invention might use are not so limited, although TCP/IP is a frequently implemented protocol.
User systems 12 might communicate with system 16 using TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc. In an example where HTTP is used, user system 12 might include an HTTP client commonly referred to as a “browser” for sending and receiving HTTP messages to and from an HTTP server at system 16. Such an HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network interface between system 16 and network 14, but other techniques might be used as well or instead. In some implementations, the interface between system 16 and network 14 includes load sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests evenly over a plurality of servers. At least as for the users that are accessing that server, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS' data; however, other alternative configurations may be used instead.
In one embodiment, system 16, shown in
One arrangement for elements of system 16 is shown in
Several elements in the system shown in
According to one embodiment, each user system 12 and all of its components are operator configurable using applications, such as a browser, including computer code run using a central processing unit such as an Intel Pentium® processor or the like. Similarly, system 16 (and additional instances of an MTS, where more than one is present) and all of their components might be operator configurable using application(s) including computer code to run using a central processing unit such as processor system 17, which may include an Intel Pentium® processor or the like, and/or multiple processor units. A computer program product embodiment includes a machine-readable storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the embodiments described herein. Computer code for operating and configuring system 16 to intercommunicate and to process web pages, applications and other data and media content as described herein are preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data. Additionally, the entire program code, or portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will also be appreciated that computer code for implementing embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, Java™, JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used. (Java™ is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.).
According to one embodiment, each system 16 is configured to provide web pages, forms, applications, data and media content to user (client) systems 12 to support the access by user systems 12 as tenants of system 16. As such, system 16 provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate unless the data is shared. If more than one MTS is used, they may be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city B). As used herein, each MTS could include one or more logically and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across one or more geographic locations. Additionally, the term “server” is meant to include a computer system, including processing hardware and process space(s), and an associated storage system and database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in the art. It should also be understood that “server system” and “server” are often used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the database object described herein can be implemented as single databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database or storage network and associated processing intelligence.
User system 12, network 14, system 16, tenant data storage 22, and system data storage 24 were discussed above in
Application platform 18 includes an application setup mechanism 38 that supports application developers' creation and management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into tenant data storage 22 by save routines 36 for execution by subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 104 managed by tenant management process 110 for example. Invocations to such applications may be coded using PL/SOQL 34 that provides a programming language style interface extension to API 32. A detailed description of some PL/SOQL language embodiments is discussed in commonly owned co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/828,192 entitled, PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTENDING APIS TO EXECUTE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATABASE APIS, by Craig Weissman, filed Oct. 4, 2006, which is incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be detected by one or more system processes, which manages retrieving application metadata 116 for the subscriber making the invocation and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual machine.
Each application server 100 may be communicably coupled to database systems, e.g., having access to system data 25 and tenant data 23, via a different network connection. For example, one application server 1001 might be coupled via the network 14 (e.g., the Internet), another application server 100N-1 might be coupled via a direct network link, and another application server 100N might be coupled by yet a different network connection. Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) are typical protocols for communicating between application servers 100 and the database system. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that other transport protocols may be used to optimize the system depending on the network interconnect used.
In certain embodiments, each application server 100 is configured to handle requests for any user associated with any organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a user and/or organization to a specific application server 100. In one embodiment, therefore, an interface system implementing a load balancing function (e.g., an F5 Big-IP load balancer) is communicably coupled between the application servers 100 and the user systems 12 to distribute requests to the application servers 100. In one embodiment, the load balancer uses a least connections algorithm to route user requests to the application servers 100. Other examples of load balancing algorithms, such as round robin and observed response time, also can be used. For example, in certain embodiments, three consecutive requests from the same user could hit three different application servers 100, and three requests from different users could hit the same application server 100. In this manner, system 16 is multi-tenant, wherein system 16 handles storage of, and access to, different objects, data and applications across disparate users and organizations.
As an example of storage, one tenant might be a company that employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 16 to manage their sales process. Thus, a user might maintain contact data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 22). In an example of a MTS arrangement, since all of the data and the applications to access, view, modify, report, transmit, calculate, etc., can be maintained and accessed by a user system having nothing more than network access, the user can manage his or her sales efforts and cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the lobby.
While each user's data might be separate from other users' data regardless of the employers of each user, some data might be organization-wide data shared or accessible by a plurality of users or all of the users for a given organization that is a tenant. Thus, there might be some data structures managed by system 16 that are allocated at the tenant level while other data structures might be managed at the user level. Because an MTS might support multiple tenants including possible competitors, the MTS should have security protocols that keep data, applications, and application use separate. Also, because many tenants may opt for access to an MTS rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and backup are additional functions that may be implemented in the MTS. In addition to user-specific data and tenant-specific data, system 16 might also maintain system level data usable by multiple tenants or other data. Such system level data might include industry reports, news, postings, and the like that are sharable among tenants.
In certain embodiments, user systems 12 (which may be client systems) communicate with application servers 100 to request and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 16 that may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 22 and/or system data storage 24. System 16 (e.g., an application server 100 in system 16) automatically generates one or more SQL statements (e.g., one or more SQL queries) that are designed to access the desired information. System data storage 24 may generate query plans to access the requested data from the database.
A table generally contains one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an instance of data for each category defined by the fields. For example, a CRM database may include a table that describes a customer with fields for basic contact information such as name, address, phone number, fax number, etc. Another table might describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as customer, product, sale price, date, etc.
In some multi-tenant database systems, tenants may be allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,161, filed Apr. 2, 2004, entitled “Custom Entities and Fields in a Multi-Tenant Database System,” and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, teaches systems and methods for creating custom objects as well as customizing standard objects in a multi-tenant database system.
In general, it is desirable to provide systems and methods that allow users to configure the display layout or page view of data to be displayed. Accordingly, in one embodiment, side tab navigation tools are provided that allow users to drag and drop representations of page elements to new locations, and into or out of a section designated for elements to be hidden from the page. Additionally, “jump links” and “flyout previews” afford quick access to page content in some embodiments.
Side Tab Navigation
According to one embodiment, a side tab navigation tool is provided to allow users to navigate to different parts of a data record and personalize the organization of certain aspects of displayed views of records.
In one embodiment, side tabs can be re-ordered. In certain aspects, a user can drag and drop side tabs to define any order desired. This is a personalization feature; upon selection of an order by a user, the system stores the user's side tab order preferences to the database. In certain aspects, once applied to any given record, the order preference rule is applied to all records of this object type (in this case, all Opportunity records), as viewed by the current user, regardless of underlying record layout. In certain aspects, whichever side tab is in the first position is the one that will be displayed by default when the user first is presented with any record detail page for that object type.
In certain aspects, sub-tabs, e.g., children of a side tab, are miniature representations of related lists. Sub-tabs have a label and, as shown in square brackets, a record count for that related list (e.g., “Cases [2]” means there are 2 cases related to the current record) as shown in
Like side tabs, in certain aspects, sub-tabs can be dragged and dropped to define a new order. This too is a personalization feature. Once applied to a given record, the preference rule is stored to the database and is applied to all records of this object type. However, because different records of a single object type may be displayed using a variety of layouts, with different combinations and orderings of related lists, algorithmic rules for applying rules locally (on a single record/layout) to a global scope (all records/layouts for that object type) for a given user may be applied. (See, e.g., “Page Views Personalization” section below). In the example shown in
In certain aspects, a sub-tab, and its related list counterparts, can be hidden from the record view altogether (like sub-tab reordering, this is also a personalization feature with local-to-global rule application). Dropping a sub-tab into a special container, presented just-in-time as the sub-tab is being dragged, hides the sub-tab from the page in one embodiment.
When there are hidden related lists on a page, the side navigation tab features a link that displays how many related lists are hidden. In certain aspects, this link also acts as a toggle for opening and closing a box or container that contains hidden sub-tabs. At the beginning of the previous step-by-step example, in
To unhide a related list from the page, a user may drag the list back from the hide container and position it back in the desired position in the visible sub-tabs stack. As shown in
In certain aspects, as shown in
Page Views Personalization
Related List Customization
According to one embodiment, embodiments that enable user-level configuration of related lists in a detail page are provided. A current method presents a user with a global view of all related lists that are visible to the user. This may be more than the related lists the user sees on a single detail page, if the user has multiple layouts mapped to the user via record types. Record types allow the system to present different versions of a detail page for a particular object type to different users, based on their profile definitions, or to the same user, based on other aspects of the business context. Variations might include the inclusion or exclusion of one or more fields, field position within the layout, and so on. In that method, the user is asked to rank all of their related lists in priority order. From then on, when the user views any given record, the related lists on that layout will be shown in that order, while skipping any related lists that aren't on the current layout.
Because it is desirable to allow users to change the order of related lists using direct manipulation, such as through drag and drop directly on the detail page, a method to reconcile this interaction with the existing global customization list is needed.
(Method 1) Incremental customization
In one embodiment, drag and drop functionality is provided to allow the user to drag one or multiple related lists, e.g., using both shift+click and control+click, to allow users to move groups of contiguous and non-contiguous related lists, respectively. When a user drags a related list or group of related lists to a new position within the stack, this information is translated into changes to the global list of related list relative ordering. To accomplish this, the system considers the position of the related list(s) being moved relative to the overall stack (known from here on as the “span”, referring to the group's high/low extreme positions within the stack). For each related list in the span, its priority index in the global list is determined. Depending on whether the move was above or below the span, the global priority index of the moved related list(s) is changed to be either immediately above or immediately below the indexes of the span. Depending on the implementation, the numerical definition of “above” and “below” may differ based on whether a larger number index indicates a higher or lower priority. Furthermore, in one aspect, if a user moves a multi-selected group of related lists, they are treated as one contiguous, ordered group when they are re-positioned, regardless of whether they were originally contiguous.
There are multiple ways to implement this, which are dependent on the computing systems involved. In an on-demand model accessed through a web browser, as an example, one embodiment uses a division of responsibilities between the user's interface system in the browser (aka the client) and the server which handles requests and persists changes to the multitenant database. In the incremental customization model, the client browser system translates the user's actions into programmatic calls to the server, which then persists those changes into the global priority list stored in the database.
As an illustration, consider a list of 3 related lists on a given layout, identified from top to bottom (in priority order) as A, B and D. The global priority list is a superset which contains the 4 prioritized related lists A, B, C and D (C exists in the global list because it is on another layout). The user is viewing a record with the aforementioned layout and decides to shift-select B and D and move them above A. The client-side UI determines that B and D are the items to be moved and the “span” that they move across is simply the singleton set of {A}. The client then translates this into a remote method call to the server. In one embodiment, an asynchronous HTTP request is sent to the server with the following parameters:
moved 0=B
moved 1=D
relative—0=A
position=ABOVE
The number of parameters with the “moved” and “relative” prefixes varies according to the number of items moved and the size of the span, respectively. The ordering of the items is indicated by the appended underscore character and zero-based numerical index. While “relative” represents the span, it does not strictly require an indication of the ordering, as their global indexes need to be found in the global list known on the server. The “position” parameter dictates the position of the moved items in relation to the span. The server receives these parameters, looks up the global indexes of the “relative” items, and assigns the new indexes to the “moved” items. One method of performing this operation in a system that uses integer indexes is to temporarily assign decimal indexes to the moved items, resort all items by those indexes, and then reassign new indexes to all items. So in this example, where the global indexes start out as A=1, B=2, C=3, and D=4, the move could temporarily assign B=0.1 and D=0.2, resulting in a reordering of B=0.1, D=0.2, A=1, C=2, which is finally reassigned as B=1, D=2, A=3, C=4.
Another operation is to hide certain items from view, by dragging them to a certain area in the user interface. In one embodiment, this is accomplished on the server by using a separate server call to pass in an unordered list of items to hide. These items are then deleted from the master customization list and the indexes are reassigned to fill in the gaps. To accomplish un-hiding, where the items are dragged back into the list, the previously-described server call may be (re-)used to unhide the elements in the same method as the reordering, where the “moved” parameters are the un-hidden items.
It should be noted that, in a web-based system where a user may have multiple browsers or sessions open, there may be certain views that have an out-of-date representation of the global customization. In this case, any customization requests that are sent from these clients are fulfilled to the best extent possible, and any invalid operations are ignored.
(Method 2) Initial Ordering
Because a user might use drag and drop only, a way to decide on the initial ordering for the master list is needed. For most users who will only be configured to view records through a single layout definition, this is straightforward. For users who may use multiple layout definitions, in one embodiment, a scoring algorithm is used to decide the initial global ordering of the related lists, which is applied “just in time” when the user makes the first drag and drop customization, if no customization already exists.
Appendices A and B illustrate various embodiments and aspects of page views personalization. U.S. Pat. No. 7,774,366, entitled “Systems and Methods for Implementing Multi-Application Tabs and Tab Sets” discusses aspects of tabs and tab sets, and is hereby incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of the specific embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. To the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements as would be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5577188 | Zhu | Nov 1996 | A |
5608872 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5649104 | Carleton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715450 | Ambrose et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5745112 | Hirose | Apr 1998 | A |
5761419 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5819038 | Carleton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821937 | Tonelli et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831610 | Tonelli et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5873096 | Lim et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5918159 | Fomukong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5963953 | Cram et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983227 | Nazem et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6092083 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6169534 | Raffel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178425 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189011 | Lim et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216133 | Masthoff | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216135 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233617 | Rothwein et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236978 | Tuzhilin | May 2001 | B1 |
6266669 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288717 | Dunkle | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295530 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324568 | Diec et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324693 | Brodersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336137 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
D454139 | Feldcamp et al. | Mar 2002 | S |
6367077 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6405220 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411949 | Schaffer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434550 | Warner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446089 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6535909 | Rust | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549908 | Loomans | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553563 | Ambrose et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560461 | Fomukong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574635 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577726 | Huang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601087 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604117 | Lim et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604128 | Diec et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609150 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621834 | Scherpbier et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654032 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665648 | Brodersen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665655 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684438 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711565 | Subramaniam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724399 | Katchour et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728702 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728960 | Loomans et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732095 | Warshavsky et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732100 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732111 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6754681 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760735 | Rusche | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763501 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768904 | Kim | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782383 | Subramaniam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804330 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826565 | Ritchie et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826582 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826745 | Coker | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829655 | Huang et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842748 | Warner et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850895 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850949 | Warner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6907566 | McElfresh et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7062502 | Kesler | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7100111 | McElfresh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7194695 | Racine et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7269590 | Hull et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7340411 | Cook | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7373599 | McElfresh et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7401094 | Kesler | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7406501 | Szeto et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7444597 | Perantatos et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454509 | Boulter et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7599935 | La Rotonda et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7603331 | Tuzhilin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620655 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644122 | Weyer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668861 | Steven | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7698160 | Beaven et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7730478 | Weissman | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747648 | Kraft et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7779039 | Weissman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7827208 | Bosworth et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853881 | Assal et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7945653 | Zuckerberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8005896 | Cheah | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8073850 | Hubbard et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8082301 | Ahlgren et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095413 | Beaven | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8095531 | Weissman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8095594 | Beaven et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103611 | Tuzhilin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8150913 | Cheah | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8209333 | Hubbard et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8275836 | Beaven et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8365084 | Lin et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
20010044791 | Richter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020072951 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129352 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143997 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162090 | Parnell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165742 | Robins | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004971 | Gong | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018705 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030066031 | Laane et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066032 | Ramachandran et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069936 | Warner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070000 | Coker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070004 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070005 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074418 | Coker | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120675 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151633 | George et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159136 | Huang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187921 | Diec et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189600 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204427 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206192 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225730 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001092 | Rothwein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010489 | Rio et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015981 | Coker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027388 | Berg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040128001 | Levin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186860 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193510 | Catahan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199489 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199536 | Barnes Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199543 | Braud et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249854 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260534 | Pak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260659 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268299 | Lei et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050050555 | Exley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091098 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050177784 | Andrews et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060036568 | Moore et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060206834 | Fisher et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080077613 | Hay et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090063415 | Chatfield et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20120290407 | Hubbard et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Google Plus Users”, Google+Ripples, Oct. 31, 2011 [retrieved on Feb. 21, 2012 from Internet at http://www.googleplusers.com/google-ripples.html], 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110296336 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61328125 | Apr 2010 | US | |
61328107 | Apr 2010 | US |