The invention relates to a sieve device for a pulverulent to granular sieving material, in particular to a control sieve for milling products, such as flour, middlings or semolina, comprising a sieving material inlet, a sieving reject outlet and a sifted material outlet, the sieve device comprising one or more sieve frames with a sieve attached to each as well as a base stand. The invention relates to a method for sieving a pulverulent to granular sieving material.
The invention relates to a method for sieving a pulverulent to granular sieving material.
Controlled sieving operations are necessary in many processes which produce bulk material and process or transport bulk material in order to prevent disruptive or dangerous foreign matter from entering delivered or packaged bulk material. This is particularly important in the processing and transportation of milling products, such as flour, middlings or semolina.
Since a controlled sieving operation usually takes place in a transport line in which the bulk material is transported by, for example, its gravity or by a pneumatic system, attempts are made on the one hand to keep the resistance, produced by the controlled sieving in the transport line, as low as possible, while on the other hand as fine a sieving operation as possible is desired in order to separate even small foreign matter from the bulk material.
The object of the invention is therefore to develop the sieve device mentioned at the outset in such a way that it allows a very fine sieving control in a flow of bulk material, simultaneously with low resistance to the bulk material flow.
This object is achieved with the sieve device mentioned at the outset in that the sieve frame is mounted movably relative to the base stand of the sieve device and is coupled with a vibration source by which the sieve frame may be set into vibratory movement relative to the base stand of the sieve device.
The vibratory movements of the sieve frame relative to the base stand of the sieve device cause a sieving action and prevent sieving material from building up on the sieve during operation, which can ultimately result in the sieve becoming blocked. Occupancy of the sieve may be substantially avoided and practically constant operating conditions are achieved in respect of the throughput of bulk material and—if a pneumatic transportation means is used—in respect of the drop in pressure in the pneumatic line. Moreover, the bulk material may be transported parallel to the sieve plane.
The sieve frame may preferably be set into vibratory movements, the frequency of which is in the range of from 15 Hz to 100 Hz and the amplitude of which is in the range of from 0.1 mm to 6 mm. In this frequency range, there are one or more natural sieve frequencies in the case of conventional sieves for fine bulk materials, such as flour, middlings, semolina etc., so that not only does the sieve frame/sieve unit (as a quasi rigid body unit) carry out a forced vibratory movement, but also the sieve performs membrane vibrations with relatively high amplitudes. In the process, the sieve is excited to a fundamental oscillation at the sieve basic frequency and to harmonics at sieve harmonic frequencies. Overall, this results in effective cleaning of control sieves.
In an advantageous embodiment, the sieve frame is mounted on the base stand so that it may be caused to vibrate by means of at least one oscillating spring arrangement, the sieve frame and the oscillating spring arrangement defining an oscillating unit of which the resonant frequency is substantially determined by the mass of the sieve frame and the spring constant of the oscillating spring arrangement.
In a sieve frame having a rectangular contour, a total of four oscillating spring arrangements of this type are preferably used which are positioned symmetrically and/or are evenly distributed round the contour of the sieve frame. It is advantageous if the oscillating spring arrangements are each positioned on the long sides of the rectangular sieve frame in the vicinity of the corners. Alternatively, the oscillating spring arrangements may also be positioned on each side of the rectangular sieve frame, in the middle of the side in each case. For sieve frames which have a different contour, for example a triangular, hexagonal or circular contour, the oscillating spring arrangements are likewise preferably positioned either in the corners or in the middle of the sides or are distributed evenly over the circumference of the circle.
It is beneficial if the frequency of the vibratory movements is in the range between 40 Hz and 80 Hz, operation preferably taking place in such a way that the sieve frame vibrations are close to the vibratory resonance of the sieve frame/spring unit. This means that a large amount of energy may be introduced into the bulk material by the sieve or sieves. It is particularly advantageous if the sieve frame operating vibrations are in the range of from 90 to 110% and preferably from 95% to 105% of the resonant frequency of the sieve frame/base stand vibrations.
It has been found specifically with flour that, at frequencies in the range of from 40 Hz to 80 Hz, the sieve effectively cleans itself during operation and the formation of agglomerated material and compression of the flour over the sieve is prevented.
In an advantageous embodiment, the operating vibration of the sieve device is 50 Hz or 60 Hz. This means that the alternating voltages of existing mains supplies may be used in a particularly simple manner as an energy source for powering the vibration sources.
The vibration source is expediently a source of mechanical oscillations or vibrations, it being possible for the vibration source to be coupled with the sieve frame by mechanical, inductive or capacitive means. The inductive and capacitive coupling methods are carried out without contact and are thus very low-wear and quiet.
The vibration source may also be a source of electromagnetic oscillations or vibrations, the vibration source being inductively or capacitively coupled with the sieve frame.
In a preferred embodiment, the sieve frame is mounted linearly on the base stand with one degree of freedom and coupled with the vibration source in such a way that the sieve frame may be set into a linear backwards and forwards motion. This embodiment is particularly simple, yet effective.
In a further preferred embodiment, the sieve frame is mounted in a planar manner on the base stand with two degrees of freedom and is coupled with the vibration source in such a way that the sieve frame may be set into a rotating, in particular an elliptical orbiting motion. This embodiment is extremely effective in preventing the sieve from becoming blocked over its entire surface.
In a particularly advantageous embodiment, the sieve frame is mounted movably relative to the base stand of the sieve device and is coupled with a first vibration source by which the sieve frame may be set into vibratory movements relative to the base stand of the sieve device, and the sieve device has an equalising element which is mounted movably relative to the base stand of the sieve device and is coupled with a second vibration source. As a result of both the sieve frame/sieve unit and the equalising element being respectively set into an oscillatory or vibratory motion, it is possible for the vibratory forces of the sieve device which act outwardly on, for example, bearings and foundations to be compensated. In this respect, the first vibration source and the second vibration source may preferably be powered in phase opposition to one another. The base stand is preferably used as the equalising element and is also sprung and cushioned with respect to the ground, the spring mounting between the sieve frame and the base stand having a low cushioning, while the spring mounting between the base stand and the ground have a high cushioning. Specific absorbing springs, for example, are used for this purpose.
The sieve frame and the equalising element may be mounted linearly on the base stand with one degree of freedom and may be coupled with the first vibration source or the second vibration source respectively in such a way that the sieve frame may be set into a linear backwards and forwards motion and the equalising element may be set into a backwards and forwards motion in phase opposition to the motion of the sieve frame, the vibration vectors of the first and second vibration sources preferably being collinear and the centres of gravity of the sieve frame/sieve unit and of the equalising element being located on the straight lines defined by the collinear vibration vectors. Consequently, cost-effective compensation of outwardly acting forces of the sieve device is achieved.
According to a further development, the sieve frame and the equalising element are mounted in planar manner on the base stand with two degrees of freedom and are coupled with the first vibration source or the second vibration source respectively in such a way that the sieve frame may be set into a rotating, in particular an elliptical path motion and the equalising element may be set into a rotating motion in phase opposition to the motion of the sieve frame, the two vibration vectors of the first and second vibration sources being coplanar and the centres of gravity of the sieve frame/sieve unit and of the equalising element being located in the plane defined by the coplanar vibration vectors. In this case also, compensation of outwardly acting forces of the sieve device is achieved, with the additional advantage that the sieve is equally free virtually everywhere from material remaining thereon.
The vibration vector preferably has a component which is perpendicular to the sieve plane of the sieve frame. This ensures fluidisation of the bulk material, as a result of which the flow resistance through the sieve is minimised.
If the vibration vector is oriented in such a way that it has one component perpendicular to, and one component parallel to the sieve plane of the sieve frame, transverse transportation of bulk material may be achieved, in addition to the fluidisation thereof.
It is particularly advantageous if the aforementioned equalising element is a second sieve frame which, like the first sieve frame, is mounted movably relative to the base stand of the sieve device and is coupled with the second vibration source.
Particularly effective compensation of outwardly acting vibration forces of the sieve device may be achieved in that the mass M1 and the vector components of the amplitude A1 of the vibration vector of the sieve frame/sieve unit on the one hand and the mass M2 and the vector components of the amplitude A2 of the vibration vector of the equalising element are selected in such a way that they are in a ratio of 0.5<(A1×M1)/(A2×M2)<1.5.
The following preferably applies to this ratio: 0.8<(A1×M1)/(A2×M2)<1.2.
The ratio (A1×M1)/(A2×M2) is generally selected in such a way that it is slightly smaller than one, since a certain amount of bulk material is always on the sieve during operation, so that during operation an effective mass M1* is produced which is slightly greater than M1. The ratio (A1×M1)/(A2×M2)=1 then approximately applies during operation, and effective compensation of the outwardly acting forces is achieved. The ground forces in particular may be minimised.
Expediently, 5<M2/M1<15 applies to the ratio of the mass M2 of the equalising element or of the base stand to the mass M1 of the sieve frame. The ratio 8<M2/M1<12 is preferred and M2/M1=10 applies in particular.
Since the power consumption P of the vibrating sieve frame and thus also of the bulk material over the sieve frame depends on the effective mass M of the sieve frame and on the amplitude A and the frequency f of the forced vibration (P is proportional to M, to A2 and to f3 or P=k×M×A2×f3, wherein k is a constant), it is possible to achieve optimum operation for the respective bulk material and sieve by adjusting the amplitude A and the frequency f. This generally entails minimising the bulk material transport resistance through the sieve.
In a specific embodiment, the base stand is used as the equalising element. Alternatively, the multiple sieve frames of one sieve stack may also be mounted in such a way that they vibrate relative to one another. A sieve stack of this type preferably has two, four, six or a greater even number of identical or at least dimensionally identical sieve frames, where two of the sieves are always coupled in pairs and, within each pair, the two sieve frames are set into opposite phase vibratory motion. In this way, the sieve device according to the invention may be constructed in a compact manner and, during operation with sieve frame vibration, releases practically no dynamic forces to the surroundings and in particular does not release to the ground any great power peaks which add to the static ground load.
The aforementioned oscillating spring arrangements each have at least one helical spring. However, an oscillating spring arrangement consisting of two identical helical springs is advantageous, the first helical spring being fixed between an upper portion of the base stand and a portion of the sieve frame and the second helical spring being fixed between a lower portion of the base stand and a portion of the sieve frame. In this two-fold arrangement, the two helical springs are positioned collinearly with their longitudinal axes, in such a way that the mentioned portion of the sieve frame is mounted in the centre of a resulting helical spring which is double the length of each of the identical helical springs and is fixed between an upper portion and a lower portion of the base stand. A particularly advantageous helical spring arrangement is one which consists of four identical helical springs. This four-fold arrangement consists of two adjacent two-fold arrangements.
It is advantageous if the oscillating spring arrangements are mechanically pretensioned to a sufficient extent, i.e. if they are pre-compressed in the resting state. In this case, the butt joints between the ends of the oscillating spring arrangements and the portions of the base stand or the butt joints between the ends of the individual helical springs and the portions of the sieve frame are constantly subjected to pressure in vibration mode as well. This contributes to smooth running, since metal does not impact on metal in vibration mode.
It is particularly advantageous if, in the case of at least one helical spring, the straight connecting line runs through the first end of the helical spring winding and through the second end of the helical spring winding non-parallel to the longitudinal axis of the helical spring. Since the helical springs are alternately compressed and extended in vibration mode, the angles of inclination of the individual helical spring windings also constantly change. This also applies to the two outermost windings at both ends of a helical spring. Even when the two last windings periodically move away from the contact surface on the base stand or on the sieve frame and move towards said contact surface again, the two ends of the helical spring winding remain in constant contact with the sieve frame and the base stand. This results in a force component and movement component, caused by the alternatingly compressed and extended helical springs, of the sieve frame and base stand in a horizontal direction in addition to the (generally ever greater) force component and movement component of the sieve frame and base stand in a vertical direction.
Rotation of the at least one mounted helical spring about its longitudinal axis allows this non-parallelism between the straight connecting line of the ends of the helical spring winding and the helical spring longitudinal axis, and thus the magnitude of the horizontal components, to be adjusted. Due to this possibility of adjusting the vector of the force amplitude and the vector of the movement amplitude of the sieve frame, it is possible, for example, to adjust and optimise the throughput of flour through the sieve as well as the transport of flour parallel to the plane of the sieve.
It is expedient if, for each of the helical springs, the straight connecting line runs through the first end of the helical spring winding and through the second end of the helical spring winding, non-parallel to the helical spring longitudinal axis.
It is then possible, by rotating not only one or more selected helical springs about their longitudinal axes, but by rotating all the helical springs about their longitudinal axes, to adjust the force amplitude vector and the movement amplitude vector of the sieve frame. The angle between the direction of the straight connecting line and the direction of the helical spring longitudinal axis may be in the range of from 1° to 45° and preferably in the range of from 5° to 30°.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the sieve device according to the invention is characterised in that, for all the helical springs of the oscillating spring arrangement, the distance s1, measured parallel to the helical spring longitudinal axis, between the mutually facing surfaces of the first spring end and of the winding adjacent to the first spring end as well as the distance s2, measured parallel to the helical spring longitudinal axis, between the mutually facing surfaces of the second spring end and of the winding adjacent to the second spring end is greater than the amplitude of the extension vibration or the maximum extension of the spring dmax divided by the number n of windings of the respective helical spring, i.e. s1>dmax/n and s2>dmax/n. This prevents these mutually facing adjacent surfaces of the helical springs from touching one another in vibration mode. This measure contributes significantly to the smooth running of a sieve device of this type.
The end of the helical springs resting on the sieve frame and the end resting on the base stand may be planar in each case, in such a way that a planar contact surface directed towards the sieve frame and a planar contact surface directed towards the base frame is respectively present. This provides a stable seat for the helical springs on the portions of the base stand and the sieve frame.
In this embodiment, the two planar contact surfaces may extend parallel to each other and non-orthogonally to the helical spring longitudinal axis.
Consequently, it is also possible in this case to adjust the force amplitude vector and the movement amplitude vector of the sieve frame by rotating one or more selected helical springs or all the helical springs about their longitudinal axes. The angle between the direction of the normal to the contact planes and the direction of the helical spring longitudinal axis may are in the range of from 1° to 30° and preferably in the range of from 5° to 15°.
In the method according to the invention, the pulverulent to granular material to be sieved is placed on to the sieve, while the sieve secured to a sieve frame is set, together with the sieve frame, into vibratory motion relative to a base stand. It has surprisingly been found that short sieve times are achieved in batchwise operation and high sieve yields in continuous operation, if the vibratory movements are carried out in such a way that the following applies to the amplitude a and to the frequency f of the vibratory movements of the sieve: 150 m2/s3<a2×ω3<500 m2/s3, where the angular frequency ω=2×π×f. The value a2×ω3=I is a measure of intensity.
The amplitude a is advantageously within the range of 1 mm<a<5 mm.
Particularly short sieve times or high sieve yields are obtained if 200 m2/s3<I<400 m2/s3. However, sieving is preferably carried out within the range of 250 m2/s3<I<350 m2/s3, the amplitudes preferably being within the range of 2 mm<a<4 mm.
Advantageous frequency ranges in this respect are 40 Hz<f<70 Hz, in particular 45 Hz<f<65 Hz.
Depending on the type of material to be sieved, short sieve times or high sieve yields are also obtained for the frequency ranges 40 Hz<f<48 Hz, 51 Hz<f<59 Hz, 62 Hz<f<70 Hz. The existing standard mains frequencies of 50 Hz (e.g. Europe) or 60 Hz (America) can advantageously also be used with relatively favourable electrical vibration drives.
Further advantages, features and possible applications of the invention will emerge from the following description of non-limiting examples given with reference to the drawings, in which:
The rigid sieve frame 5 with the sieve 5a mounted therein is positioned inside a base stand 8, is mounted in such a way that it may move relative to the base frame 8 and is coupled with four vibration sources 7 (only two of which are visible in
The sieving material inlet 2 has a flexible inlet portion 2a which connects it to the sieve frame 5. Likewise, the sifted material outlet 4 has a flexible outlet portion 4a which connects it to the sieve frame 5. A similar flexible outlet portion (not shown) may also be provided on the sieving reject outlet 3.
Cushioning springs 9 are positioned between the base stand 8 and the stands or feet 8a as well as various casing parts 8b.
The chamber above the sieve (upper sieve chamber) and the chamber below the sieve (lower sieve chamber) have only one or a plurality of inlets 2 respectively or have only one or a plurality of outlets 4 respectively.
Instead of only one sieve frame 5 with the sieve 5a mounted therein, it is also possible for a plurality of sieve frames 5 of this type with a respective sieve to be positioned inside the sieve device 1 as an overall rigid sieve stack. It is also advantageous if two sieve frames 5 with a respective sieve 5a and overall the same mass are positioned either side by side or one above the other and are set into vibration in phase opposition to one another. Consequently, during a vibratory phase, the two sieve frames move either towards one another or away from each other with the same speed values. In this way, practically no reaction forces and inertial forces are transferred by the sieve frame 5 via the base stand 8. Thus, virtually no additional dynamic ground forces are exerted via the stands 8a, apart from the static ground forces.
The sieve frame 5 and the base stand 8 are preferably produced in a sandwich construction or from a composite material. It is particularly advantageous in this respect if the material of the sieve frame 5 and/or of the base stand 8 is honeycomb-like or porous, at least in certain regions, and in particular is made of a foamed material. The materials used for this purpose are preferably stainless steel, aluminium or a polymer, it being possible for the foamed regions to consist, for example, of aluminium or polymer. A sieve frame 5 and a base stand 8 constructed in this way each have a high rigidity, but a low mass.
Soft iron is preferably used as the armature material.
Instead of a soft iron armature, it is also possible to use a permanently magnetised armature 71c consisting of a ferromagnetic alloy. The two electromagnets 71a, 71b are then periodically reversed in polarity. They are activated with the same frequency, but in phase opposition, in order to alternately produce a half period with upwardly acting force on the armature and a half period with downwardly acting force on the armature.
If a relatively small force input suffices in the sieve frame vibration, then instead of using two identical electromagnets, it is also possible to use only one of these electromagnets.
Soft iron or a permanently magnetised ferromagnetic material may also be used in this case as the material for the armature portions. Instead of using aluminium for the armature clip, it is also possible to use a different non-ferromagnetic material.
Instead of the single electromagnetic group 73a, 73b, 73c shown on the left-hand side of the armature 73d, it is also possible for a second electromagnetic group (not shown) to be positioned on the right-hand side of the armature 73d.
The linear drive of the third example has the advantage that the armature excursion may be considerably greater than in the case of the linear drives of the first and second examples.
The linear drives 71, 72 and 73 shown in
Similar considerations with respect to the arrangement of the oscillating springs 6 and the vibration sources 7 apply to other frame contours (square, triangular, elliptic or circular). The oscillating springs 6 are spaced consistently and uniformly and are positioned in particular at the corners of the frame 5, while vibration sources 7 are positioned respectively in the intermediate regions of the frame. The result of this arrangement of the oscillating springs 6 and vibration sources 7 is that less than 10% of the vibration energy stored in the sieve device 1 according to the invention is stored in modal vibrations of the frame 5 and by far the greatest portion of more than 90% is stored in the pure vibration, i.e. up and down movement of the frame, so the frame 5 behaves practically as a rigid body which predominantly performs rigid body vibrations.
A particularly compact and advantageous arrangement is one in which the vibration sources 7 and the oscillating springs 6 are positioned or overlap at one point in the plan view of the sieve frame 5.
The sieve frame or sieve stack 5 with a fixed sieve 5a of the sieve device 1 according to the invention may also be divided by partitions (not shown) above the fixed sieve 5a. The advantage of this segmenting of the sieve surface is that for practically all operating conditions and in particular when deviating from desired operating conditions (for example inclination of the sieve, air flow parallel to the sieve), a substantially uniform distribution of the sieving material is ensured over the sieve 5a within the sieve frame.
The sieve fame 5 is thus fixed in a vibrating manner on the base stand 8 via upper and lower oscillating springs and may be set into vibration by one or more vibration sources 7 acting at uniformly distributed points of the sieve frame 5 (see
The four oscillating springs 61, 62, 63 and 64 may also have non-circular cross sections perpendicularly to the spring longitudinal axis, in such a way that, depending on the direction of the load perpendicularly to the spring longitudinal axis, they have a different flexural strength. Oval oscillating spring cross sections are particularly preferred. In principle, any polygonal cross sections, such as a triangle, quadrangle, pentagon, hexagon etc. are possible in this embodiment. If oscillating springs of this type having non-circular cross sections are used in the oscillating spring arrangement 6, it is possible, similarly to the case described in the previous paragraph, to adjust the force amplitude vector and the movement amplitude vector of the sieve frame 5 by rotating these helical springs about their longitudinal axis.
For all the helical springs 61, 62, 63 and 64 (see
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 005 968.9 | Feb 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2007/000039 | 1/29/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/6/2008 |