The invention relates to sigma-delta (ΣΔ) modulators, and in particular to aspects of noise shaping in ΣΔ modulators.
BACKGROUND ART
Sigma-delta modulators (also known as delta-sigma modulators) are well-known in certain types of analog to digital (ADC) architectures. A ΣΔ modulator exploits the effects of oversampling to shape quantization errors spectrally, allowing these errors to be effectively moved to higher frequencies where they can be more easily filtered out. An example of a ΣΔ modulator is illustrated in schematic block diagram form in
b shows the modulator of
Depending on the implementation of the loop filter 102, the quantization noise can be suppressed in a specified part of the output spectrum of Y(z). The more bits are chosen for the quantizer 103 and the feedback path 104, the lower the quantization noise in the output signal Y(z) will tend to be, because the quantization errors made will be smaller. A ΣΔ modulator 100 can be implemented in several ways. One implementation is a fully digital ΣΔ modulator, where the input signal X is a digital signal, which is to be transformed into an output signal Y having a reduced number of bits. To do this involves rounding of the input signal by the quantizer 103, which introduces a quantization error. This error can be controlled using feedback, resulting in the output signal Y being a controlled copy of X, with a gain applied by the loop filter H.
Another implementation is a ΣΔ analog to digital converter, in which the input signal X(s) is a time-continuous analog signal, to be converted into a discrete signal Y(z) in the digital domain. This can be implemented in several ways. The loop filter 102 can be implemented with switched capacitors or continuous time filters, both of which have associated advantages and disadvantages. The quantizer 103 digitises the signal from the loop filter 102. The output signal Y(z) is fed back through a digital to analog converter 104, which converts the digital signal into an analog representation, which is then compared to the analog input signal X(s) by the adder/comparator 101. An advantage of this type of ADC is that of the noise shaping behaviour of the loop filter 102.
Several architectures are known to improve the noise-shaping characteristic of ΣΔ modulators. One of those is a multi-stage noise-shaping ADC, also known as a MASH or cascaded ΣΔ ADC, for example as disclosed by Breems, et al., in “A Cascaded Continuous-Time ΣΔ Modulator with 67 Dynamic Range in 10 MHz Bandwidth”, IEEE Journal of
Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 39, pp. 2152-2160, December 2004. An example of such a MASH ADC 200 is illustrated in
A further problem with the above mentioned implementation of aΣΔ ADC is that the quantization error output by a conventional ΣΔ modulator is still present and therefore needs to be removed or minimised by further processing.
It is an object of the invention to address one or more of the above mentioned problems.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a sigma-delta modulator for converting an input signal to a quantized output signal, the modulator comprising:
The second feedback loop may be connected between the output and the input of the quantizer and may comprise:
The filter in the second feedback loop optionally has unity gain in at least a part of the spectrum in which quantization noise is suppressed.
The second feedback loop of the sigma-delta modulator according to the invention may alternatively comprise:
The second feedback loop of the sigma-delta modulator according to the invention may alternatively comprise:
In a general aspect, disclosed herein is sigma-delta modulator for converting an input signal to a quantized output signal, in which a feedback loop is provided between a filter and a quantizer of the modulator, the feedback loop configured to reduce quantization errors from the modulator by filtering and subtracting quantization noise fed back to an input of the quantizer.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example, with reference to the appended drawings in which:
a is a block diagram of an exemplary known ΣΔ modulator;
b is a transfer function representation of the modulator of
a is a block diagram of an alternative ΣΔ modulator according to the invention;
b is a transfer function representation of the modulator of
a is a block diagram of a further alternative ΣΔ modulator according to the invention;
b is a transfer function representation of the modulator of
a is a block diagram of a further alternative ΣΔ modulator according to the invention; and
b is a transfer function representation of the modulator of
The modulators illustrated in
Shown in
An advantage of the modulator of
A transfer function of the input signal X and the quantization error Q to the output Y can be calculated by modelling the quantizer 403 with a quantization noise source Q and a gain of 1, with the feedback path modelled by a gain of 1. This transfer function representation of the modulator 400 of
Y=E+Q(1−F) (1)
This relationship shows that the input signal E is directly transferred to the output signal Y without being filtered or changed by the second loop. The overall stability of the modulator loop is thereby not compromised. The quantization error Q is, however, modified with a factor (1−F). A second transfer function provides the output signal in terms of the input signal X:
The original shaping behaviour of the loop filter 402, represented by function H, is unchanged and still reduces the quantization error Q by a factor of 1−F in the part of the frequency spectrum where H has gain.
If, in the second loop, the filter 406 has a gain of 1, the quantization error can be fully cancelled at the output Y. The filter 406 preferably has a gain of 1 in at least a part of the frequency spectrum in which quantization noise introduced by the quantizer 403 is to be suppressed. The filter 406 may have the characteristics of a low, high or bandpass transfer function.
The embodiment of
An alternative implementation of the invention is shown in
The transfer function of the output signal in terms of the input signal in then given by:
From equation 3 it can be seen that if G is chosen to be equal to F, the stability of the loop is still determined by the original loop filter H 402, and the stability of the modulator 500 is not compromised. The shaping of the quantization noise function Q has not changed compared to the previous embodiment shown in
An alternative embodiment to that of
When the transfer functions F and G of filters 406, 506 are made equal, the input signal X passes through the modulator 600 with a factor of one, if H has high gain. The quantization noise Q introduced by quantizer 403 is still suppressed by filter 402 and also by filter 406 when G is close to or equal to F. If F is close to 1, filter 506 together with loop filter 402 determines the stability of the modulator 500.
Other embodiments are intentionally within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08105639 | Oct 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/054643 | 10/21/2009 | WO | 00 | 4/20/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/046859 | 4/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5550544 | Sakiyama et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
6642874 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6738004 | Melanson | May 2004 | B2 |
6744392 | Melanson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6864818 | Hezar | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885330 | Trotter et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7362252 | Pai | Apr 2008 | B1 |
20040032355 | Melanson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050052304 | Trotter et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093726 | Hezar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060028364 | Rivoir | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060164272 | Philips et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187103 | Welser et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070035427 | Schreier et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080100486 | Lin | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 684 421 | Jul 2006 | EP |
9726708 | Jul 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Breems, L., et al. “A Cascaded Continuous-Time ΣΔ Modulator with 67-dB Dynamic Range in 10MHz Bandwidth”, IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 12, pp. 2152-2160 (Dec. 2004). |
Yuan, X., et al. “On Low Power Design of Feedforward Continuous-Time Sigma Delta Modulators with Excess Loop Delay”, IEEE Circuits & Systems, pp. 1882-1885 (May 18, 2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Int'l. Patent Application No. PCT/IB2009/054643 (Feb. 9, 2010). |
Norsworthy, “Delta-Sigma Data Converters: Theory, Design and Simulation”, section 3.2, “Basic Structures and Terminology”, IEEE Press, cover, copyright pg., pp. 78-80 (1997). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110199247 A1 | Aug 2011 | US |