Sigma delta modulator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6788232
  • Patent Number
    6,788,232
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 14, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 7, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A sigma delta modulator system and a method for modulating a signal are described. The sigma delta modulator includes a plurality of cascading stages, an output coupled to the plurality of the cascading stages via a plurality of feedback connections, and a feedforward connection coupled between a selected one of the plurality of cascading stages and a point closer to the output interface of the sigma delta modulator.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to sigma delta modulators. More specifically, a sigma delta modulator with a feedforward connection is disclosed.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Modern frequency synthesizers are sometimes implemented with a fractional N phase locked loop (PLL) to achieve more precise tuning of synthesized frequency. Many of these frequency synthesizers use sigma delta modulators (SDM) to produce the desired fractional values used in the circuitry.





FIG. 1

is a block diagram illustrating a frequency synthesizer with a fractional N phase locked loop and a sigma delta modulator. A reference frequency from a stable external source is input into a fractional N PLL


105


. PLL


105


generates a voltage that is applied to a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO)


100


. VCO


100


generates an output whose frequency depends on the VCO's input voltage, and the output is fed back to PLL


105


. The output frequency is divided by a multi-modulus divider


115


and sent to the rest of the PLL circuit. For the purposes of this example, details of the PLL relating to the multi-modulus divider are not shown. Modulus control


120


controls the value of the multi-modulus divider and varies the value over time.




Fractional division controller


110


supplies the values for A and B dividers. Initially, values NA and NB are sent to interface circuit


135


. Another value, NK, is sent to SDM


140


to generate a randomized sequence that is used by interface circuit


135


to generate the values for A and B dividers. This sequence determines the rate at which a modulus in the multi-modulus divider is selected, and is proportional to NK. The A and B divider outputs are sent to modulus control


120


, which sets the value in multi-modulus divider


115


accordingly. The multi-modulus divider value is in conjunction with the rest of the fractional N PLL circuit (not shown) to generate the desired voltage used by VCO


100


during the locking state. The locking frequency of the frequency synthesizer is related to the values of NA, NB, NK, modulus of multi-modulus divider


115


, the reference frequency, and certain constants.




For the PLL to successfully lock with the desired frequency, the SDM should be stable. Also, the sequence generated by the SDM should not contain any spurious frequencies, i.e., the sequence should be as close to truly random as possible and not have any repeat patterns. It would be desirable to improve upon existing SDM designs to achieve good stability and randomization characteristics. Additionally, it would be useful to design the SDM with low in-band noise.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:





FIG. 1

is a block diagram illustrating a frequency synthesizer with a fractional N phase locked loop and a sigma delta modulator.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a sigma delta modulator design according to the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram illustrating details of the sigma delta modulator shown in FIG.


2


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, or a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or electronic communication links. It should be noted that the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.




A detailed description of one or more preferred embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention. While the invention is described in connection with such embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to any embodiment. On the contrary, the scope of the invention is limited only by the appended claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. For the purpose of example, numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The present invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the present invention is not unnecessarily obscured.




An improved sigma delta modulator design is disclosed. The design utilizes a cascaded architecture with one or more feedforward connections. In one embodiment, a feedforward connection results in a stable SDM circuit that produces highly random output sequences and has low out-of-band noise as well as low in-band noise.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a sigma delta modulator design according to the present invention. The design includes a feedforward connection coupled between a cascading stage and a point closer to the output of the sigma delta modulator. The embodiment shown is a 4


th


order SDM with four cascading stages. In other embodiments, the order of the SDM, the number of stages and the number of feedforward connection differ depending on the implementation.




The input of the SDM is a digital value, K, and the output of the SDM is a random sequence of ones and zeros statistically distributed at rates proportional to K. Blocks


200


,


205


,


210


and


215


are the sigma delta stages. First stage


200


receives the input K, as well as a feedback from the output of the SDM. Each of the consecutive stages receives the output from the previous stage and feedback from the output of the SDM, and sends its output to the next stage if available. Stage


215


has an additional output that is amplified by amplifier


230


, and the additional output is sent to adder


220


. The connection between stage


215


and adder


220


via amplifier


230


is a feedforward connection connecting stage


215


to a point closer to the output interface of the modulator, where the current flows in the direction of arrow


232


. Adder


220


adds the signal from the feedforward connection with the output from stage


215


. The resulting sum is sent to quantizer


225


to be quantized.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram illustrating details of the sigma delta modulator shown in FIG.


2


. Blocks


390


,


392


,


394


and


396


correspond to the first, second, third and fourth stages. In the first stage, amplifier


300


amplifies the output with a gain of b


1


and feeds the amplified output back to adder


305


. Adder


305


sums the amplified output and the input K. The output of the adder is sent to accumulator


310


, which accumulates the adder results over time and sends the accumulated value to the next stage.




At the second, third, and fourth stages, amplifiers


315


,


335


and


355


receive and amplify the output from the previous stage. The corresponding gains associated with these amplifiers are a


2


, a


3


, and a


4


. The output of the SDM is amplified by amplifiers with gains of b


2


, b


3


and b


4


, respectively, and is fed back to the adders of each stage. The adders corresponding to these stages, i.e. adders


320


,


340


and


365


, add the amplified outputs with the output of the previous stage. The results are sent to accumulators


330


,


345


and


370


. The accumulators accumulate the outputs from the adders over time, and send the accumulated results to the next stage if there is one.




At the fourth stage, the output of amplifier


355


is amplified by another amplifier


380


with a gain of c


4


. The output from amplifier


380


is fed forward to adder


375


to be summed with the output of accumulator


370


. The output of adder


375


is quantized by a one bit quantizer


385


, and the result is a randomized sequence of ones and zeros. The rate at which ones appear in the sequence is proportional to the input value.




The feedforward connection in this embodiment adds a zero in the low frequency range of the noise transfer function of the SDM, thereby making it easier to stabilize the SDM circuit and to shape the noise. In the embodiment shown, the noise transfer function of the SDM, H(z), has the following form:








H


(


z


)=(1


−z




−1


)


4




/D


(


z


), where






D(z)=1+p


1


z


−1


+p


2


z


−2


+p


3


z


−3


+p


4


z


−4


, where p


1


, p


2


, p


3


and p


4


are real number coefficients. In other embodiments, there are more feedforward connections. These feedforward connections connect different parts of the SDM circuit, resulting in different noise transfer functions.




The gain values of the amplifiers are optimized to make the SDM circuit stable. In one embodiment, the following amplifier values are found to be optimal: a


2


=0.00781, a


3


=0.125, a


4


=0.0625, b


1


=1, b


2


=0.16242, b


3


=0.06439, b


4


=0.03398, c


4


=1. Values approximate to these are used in some embodiments. Other sets of amplifier gains that result in a stable SDM circuit can be found using methods based on the aforementioned gain values as seeds, including iterative methods based on trial and error or optimization. In embodiments where the number of stages or the configurations of the feedforward connections are different, different sets of gain values apply.




An improved sigma delta modulator design has been disclosed. The design utilizes a cascaded architecture with one or more feedforward connections that add zeros to the noise transfer function, to achieve better stability and randomization characteristics, lower out-of-band noise as well as lower in-band noise.




Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and apparatus of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A sigma delta modulator comprising:a plurality of cascading stages; an output interface coupled to the plurality of the cascading stages via a plurality of feedback connections, the output interface generating a modulated output signal corresponding to a randomized bit sequence representing a frequency range of the sigma delta modulator; a feedforward connection coupled between a selected one of the plurality of cascading stages and a point closer to the output interface of the sigma delta modulator, wherein the feedforward connection adds a zero to the randomized bit sequence in a low frequency range of the sigma delta modulator to stabilize the modulated output signal; and an adder corresponding to each of the cascading stages and producing an output signal by adding an amplified feedback output with a previous stage amplified output.
  • 2. A sigma delta modulator as recited in claim 1 wherein:the plurality of cascading stages includes a first sigma delta stage, a second sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the first sigma delta stage and having a gain of approximately 0.00781, a third sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the second sigma delta stage having a gain of approximately 0.125, a fourth sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the third sigma delta stage and having a gain of approximately 0.0625; the plurality of feed back connections includes a first feed back connection connecting to the first sigma delta stage and having a gain of approximately 1, a second feed back connection connecting to the second sigma delta stage and having a gain of approximately 0.16242, a third feed back connection connecting to the third sigma delta stage and having a gain of approximately 0.06439, a fourth feed back connection connecting to the fourth sigma delta stage and having a gain of approximately 0.03398; and the feedforward connection has a gain of approximately 1.
  • 3. A sigma delta modulator as recited in claim 1 wherein the feedback connections and feedforward connection comprise a plurality of amplifiers.
  • 4. A sigma delta modulator as recited in claim 1 wherein the feedback connections and feedforward connection comprise a plurality of amplifiers having gains that are selected to achieve stability.
  • 5. A sigma delta modulator as recited in claim 1 wherein the plurality of cascading stages are sigma delta stages.
  • 6. A sigma delta modulator as recited in claim 1 wherein the plurality of cascading stages includes a first sigma delta stage, a second sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the first sigma delta stage, a third sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the second sigma delta stage and a fourth sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the third sigma delta stage.
  • 7. A sigma delta modulator as recited in claim 1 wherein:the plurality of cascading stages includes a first sigma delta stage, a second sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the first sigma delta stage, a third sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the second sigma delta stage, a fourth sigma delta stage coupled to the output of the third sigma delta stage; the plurality of feed back connections includes a first feed back connection coupled between the output interface and the first sigma delta stage, a second feed back connection coupled between the output interface and the second sigma delta stage, a third feed back connection coupled between the output interface and the third sigma delta stage, a fourth feed back connection coupled between the output interface and the fourth sigma delta stage.
  • 8. A method for modulating an input signal to produce a modulated output signal, comprising:cascading a plurality of stages; generating the modulated output signal to correspond to a randomized bit sequence representing a frequency range of a sigma delta modulator; coupling the modulation output to the plurality of stages via a plurality of feedback connections; feeding forward the modulated output signal over a feedforward connection between a selected one of the plurality of cascading stages and a point closer to an output interface connected to the modulated output, wherein the feedforward connection adds a zero to the randomized bit sequence in a low frequency range of the frequency range of the sigma delta modulator; and adding an amplified feedback output with a previous stage amplified output to produce an output signal.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
5446460 Cabler Aug 1995 A
5629701 Ritoniemi et al. May 1997 A
5682161 Ribner et al. Oct 1997 A
5742246 Kuo et al. Apr 1998 A
5760722 Harris et al. Jun 1998 A
5936562 Brooks et al. Aug 1999 A
5949361 Fischer et al. Sep 1999 A
5982316 Shin Nov 1999 A
6144328 Eastty et al. Nov 2000 A
6271782 Steensgaard-Madsen Aug 2001 B1
6480129 Melanson Nov 2002 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Abbey, “Multi-band direct sampling receiver”, filed on Dec. 19, 1997.*
Brooks et al. “Cascaded sigma-delta pipeline A/D converter with 1.2 MHz signal bandwidth and 89 dB SNR”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 12, Dec. 1997.*
Medeiro et al., “13-bit, 2.2-MS/s, 55-mW multibit cascade Delta sigma modulator in CMOS 0.7 μm single-poly technology”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 3, No. 6, Jun. 1999.*
Kozak et al., “A novel topologies for time-interleaved Delta-sigma modulators”, IEEE Transactions On Circuits and Systems-II: Analog and digital signal processing, vol. 47, No. 7, Jul. 2000.*
Chiang et al., “Cascaded Feedforward Sigma Delta Modulator For Wide Bandwidth Applications”, IEEE 2001.*
DeMuer, Bram, et al, “A CMOS Monolithic ΔΕ-Controlled Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizer for DCS-1800”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 37, No. 7, Jul. 2002, p. 835-844.
Filiol, Norman M., et al, “An Agile ISM Band Frequency Synthesizer with Built-In GMSK Data Modulation”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 7, Jul. 1998, p. 998-1008.
Rhee, Woogeun, et al, “A 1.1-GHz CMOS Fracational-N Frequency Synthesizer with a 3-b Third-Order ΔΕ Modulator”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 10, Oct. 2000, p. 1453-1460.