Each of the following applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference:
United States patent application publication 2014/0133540 titled “Low-Complexity, Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications;”
U.S. Pat. No. 8,831,124 titled “Multi-Mode Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Transmitter for Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications;”
U.S. Pat. No. 8,681,889 titled “Multi-Mode Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Receiver for Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications;”
United States patent application publication 2015/0070089 titled “Adaptive Nonlinear Model Learning;” and
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/600,310 titled “Communication Methods and Systems for Nonlinear Multi-User Environments.”
Conventional communications systems suffer from degraded performance in the presence of nonlinear distortion. Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with some aspects of the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.
System and methods are provided for signal acquisition in a multimode environment, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
These and other advantages, aspects and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.
As used herein, a non-intersymbol-correlated (non-ISC) signal is a signal transmitted at a symbol rate that is less than twice the baseband bandwidth of the signal. Conversely, an intersymbol-correlated (ISC) signal is a signal transmitted at a symbol rate that is more than twice the baseband bandwidth of the signal. Another way of characterizing an ISC signal is that, even after: (1) sampling the signal at a sample rate at least two times its symbol rate; and (2) appropriately filtering it (e.g., a fixed root-raised-cosine (RRC) filter or equalizer configured such that an overall response of the transmitter and receiver is a raised cosine response), correlation of some or all of the resulting filtered samples is still above a threshold for two or more transmitted symbols of the signal. Attempts to recover the transmitted symbols through symbol-by-symbol slicing of the filtered samples of the ISC signal at fixed intervals will thus result in an expected error rate above a determined threshold.
As used herein, a nonlinear signal is a signal which is nonlinearly distorted to a significant degree such that the expected error rate in the receiver cannot be below a determined threshold unless the receiver compensates for the nonlinear distortion (e.g., through use of a nonlinear distortion compensation circuit that adaptively models the nonlinear distortion). A linear signal, on the other hand, is a signal for which the same receiver can achieve an expected error rate below the determined threshold even without compensating for the nonlinear distortion. The determined threshold for the expected error rate may correspond to a determined limit on nonlinear distortion which may be set by an applicable standard (e.g., promulgated by a regulatory body) and/or network operator. For example, the LTE standard specifies a maximum error vector magnitude (EVM) of 17.5% when using QPSK and 12.5% when using 16-QAM. Thus, in an example 16-QAM LTE implementation, a nonlinear signal is a signal having EVM greater than 12.5% and a linear signal is a signal having EVM of 12.5% or less.
The device 1021 comprises user interface circuitry 120 (e.g., touchscreen, buttons, speakers, etc. and their associated drivers), CPU 122, system memory 124 (e.g., flash, DRAM, SRAM, ROM, HDD, and/or the like), a receiver 126, and a transmitter 132. The receiver 126 comprises a filter 130 and a symbol slicer 128. The filter 130 may comprise, for example, a fixed-configuration filter or an equalizer that is configurable to achieve a desired response (e.g., a root-raised cosine (RRC) response, or other response such that the composite response of a transmitter and the filter 130 is a raised cosine response). The slicer 128 may be configured to sample a received signal at a fixed interval to generate pairs of in-phase and quadrature phase samples, and then determine the constellation point that is closest each such sample pair. The transmitter 132 comprises a filter 136 and a mapper 134. Each of the receiver 126 and transmitter 132 may communicate using single carrier and/or multi-carrier protocols. Where device 1021 is an LTE handset, for example, transmitter 132 may transmit in accordance with an SCFDMA scheme and receiver 126 may receive in accordance with an OFDM scheme.
The device 1022 comprises CPU 1222, system memory 1242, a receiver 140, and a transmitter 152. The receiver 140 comprises a filter 142 configured for processing non-ISC signals (e.g., configured to have an RRC response), a slicer 144, a filter 146 configured for processing intersymbol-correlated (ISC) signals, nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 148, and reduced state sequence estimation (RSSE) circuit 150. In an example implementation, the filter 142 and the filter 146 may be implemented with shared, reconfigurable circuitry. For example, an equalizer may be configurable into a first configuration which provides an RRC response and into a second configuration which provides a response such that the composite response of a transmitter and the filter 146 has desired inter-symbol correlation. In an example implementation, the ISC filter 146 (or the equalizer configured to have an ISC response) may be the same as the filter 109 in the above-incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/074,878. The slicer 144 may be the same as slicer 128. In an example implementation, the RSSE circuit 130 may be the same as the sequence estimation circuit 210 of the above-incorporated United States Patent Application Publication 2014/0133540. In an example implementation, the RSSE circuit 130 may be part of the decoding circuit 218 of the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 8,681,889. In an example implementation, the slicer 144 and the RSSE circuit 150 may be implemented with shared, reconfigurable circuitry. In an example implementation, the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 148 may comprise one or more feedback loops and nonlinear distortion modeling circuitry operable to model/reproduce nonlinear distortion introduced by the transmitter, the communication medium, and/or the receiver front-end. The transmitter 152 comprises a symbol mapper 154, a filter 156, nonlinear distorter 158, and ISC generator 158. The nonlinear distorter 155 represents circuitry (e.g., a power amplifier and/or a predistortion circuit) that may introduce nonlinear distortion to signals transmitted by the transmitter 152. In an example implementation, the ISC generator 158 may be a filter (e.g., the filter 104 in the above-incorporated United States Patent Application Publication 2014/0133540) that introduces intersymbol correlation to the signal. In such an implementation, the ISC generator 158 and the filter 156 may be implemented with shared, reconfigurable circuitry. In another example implementation, the ISC generator 158 may introduce intersymbol correlation by predistorting the signal to be transmitted. In such an implementation, the ISC generator 158 may merge with the nonlinear distorter 155. Each of the receiver 126 and transmitter 132 may communicate using single carrier and/or multi-carrier protocols. Where device 1022 is an LTE basestation, for example, transmitter 152 may transmit in accordance with an OFDM scheme and receiver 140 may receive in accordance with an SCFDMA scheme.
The device 1023 comprises UI circuitry 1203, CPU 1223, system memory 1243, a receiver 160, and a transmitter 172. The receiver 160 comprises a filter 162 (the same as or similar to filter 142 described above), a filter 166 (the same as or similar to the filter 146 described above), nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 (the same as or similar to the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 148 described above), slicer 164 (the same as or similar to slicer 144 described above), and RSSE circuit 170 (the same as or similar to the RSSE circuit 150 described above). The transmitter 172 comprises a mapper 174, a filter 176, nonlinear distorter 175, and ISC generator 178. The nonlinear distorter 155 represents circuitry (e.g., a power amplifier and/or a predistortion circuit) that may introduce nonlinear distortion to signals transmitted by the transmitter 172. In an example implementation, the ISC generator 178 may be a filter (e.g., the filter 104 in the above-incorporated United States Patent Application Publication 2014/0133540) that introduces intersymbol correlation to the signal. In such an implementation, the ISC generator 178 and the filter 176 may be implemented with shared, reconfigurable circuitry. In another example implementation, the ISC generator 178 may introduce intersymbol correlation by predistorting the signal to be transmitted. In such an implementation, the ISC generator 178 may merge with the nonlinear distorter 178. Each of the receiver 160 and transmitter 172 may communicate using single carrier and/or multi-carrier protocols. Where device 1021 is an LTE handset, for example, transmitter 172 may transmit in accordance with an SCFDMA scheme and receiver 160 may receive in accordance with an OFDM scheme.
In block 404, the device 1021 receives the non-ISC preamble and non-ISC header of frame 200 via filter 130. In block 406, the device 1021 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary), using the non-ISC preamble of frame 200. In block 408, the device 1021 processes the non-ISC header using the slicer 128. In block 410, the device 1021 receives the non-ISC payload via filter 130. In block 412, the device 1021 processes non-ISC payload using slicer 128.
In block 414, the device 1023 receives the non-ISC preamble and the non-ISC header via filter 162. In block 416, the device 1023 synchronizes its circuitry, trains its equalizer (as necessary), and trains its nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 (e.g., determines a type of nonlinear model to use and/or parameters of a selected nonlinear model to use for processing the frame 200) using the non-ISC preamble. In block 418, the device 1023 processes the non-ISC header using a receive path configured for non-ISC signals. In an example implementation, such a receive path may comprise slicer 164. In another example implementation, such a receive path may comprise the RSSE circuit 170 configured into a mode in which it operates equivalently to slicer 164. Such a mode may, for example, be characterized by a memory depth of the sequence estimation being set to zero (e.g., it may be a parameter stored in a configuration register). In an example implementation, non-ISC preambles and/or headers may be demodulated without the aid of the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 (e.g., it may be in a low power state), while in another example implementation the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 may aid demodulation of non-ISC preambles and/or headers.
In block 420, the device 1023 receives the non-ISC payload via filter 162. In block 422, the device 1023 processes non-ISC payload using a receive path configured for non-ISC signals. In an example implementation, such a receive path may comprise slicer 164. In another example implementation, such a receive path may comprise the RSSE circuit 170 configured into a mode in which it operates equivalently to slicer 164. Such a mode may, for example, be characterized by a memory depth of the sequence estimation being set to zero (e.g., it may be a parameter stored in a configuration register). In an example implementation, non-ISC payloads may be demodulated without the aid of the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 (e.g., it may be in a low power state), while in another example implementation the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 may aid demodulation of non-ISC payloads.
In block 504, the device 1021 receives the non-ISC preamble and non-ISC header via filter 130. In block 506, device 1021 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary) using the non-ISC preamble. In block 508, the device 1021 processes the non-ISC header using slicer 128. In block 510, device 1021 either fails to detect the payload, or discards the payload after detecting, based on the header, that the payload will be an ISC signal, which the device 1021 is not configured to support. Where the device 1021 fails to detect the payload it may nonetheless retain synchronization with the device 1022 based on the frame length field detected in the non-ISC header.
In block 512, device 1023 receives the non-ISC preamble and the non-ISC header via filter 162. In block 514, device 1023 synchronizes its circuitry, trains its equalizer (as necessary), and trains its nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 using the non-ISC preamble. In block 516, the device 1023 processes the non-ISC header using a receive path configured for non-ISC signals. In an example implementation, such a receive path may comprise slicer 164. In another example implementation, such a receive path may comprise the RSSE circuit 170 configured into a mode in which it operates equivalently to slicer 164. Such a mode may, for example, be characterized by a memory depth of the sequence estimation being set to zero (e.g., it may be a parameter stored in a configuration register). In an example implementation, non-ISC payloads may be demodulated without the aid of the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 (e.g., it may be in a low power state), while in another example implementation the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 may aid demodulation of non-ISC payloads.
In block 518, the device 1023 receives ISC payload via ISC filter 166. In block 520, device 1023 process the ISC payload using nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 and RSSE circuit 170. Because the payload is ISC, the RSSE 170 may operate in a mode in which the payload is filtered by the filter 176 configured for ISC signals and/or demodulated by the RSSE circuit 170 configured into a mode in which it operable to account for intersymbol correlation better than can be done with a symbol-by-symbol slicing (for an ISC signal, the intersymbol correlation is unlikely to have minimums, let alone zeros, at regular intervals). Such a mode may be characterized by, for example, a memory depth of the sequence estimation being set to a non-zero value.
In block 604, the device 1021 receives the non-ISC preamble and the non-ISC header via filter 130. In block 606, the device 1021 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary) based on the non-ISC preamble. In block 608, the device 1021 processes the non-ISC header using slicer 128. In block 610, device 1021 either fails to detect the payload or discards the payload after detecting, based on the header, that the payload will be transmitted as an ISC signal, which the device 1021 is not configured to support. Where the device 1021 fails to detect the payload it may nonetheless retain synchronization with the device 1022 based on the frame length field detected in the non-ISC header.
In block 612, the device 1023 receives the non-ISC preamble and the non-ISC header via filter 162 (e.g., configured to have an RRC response). In block 614, the device 1023 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary) based on the non-ISC preamble. In block 616, the device 1023 processes the non-ISC header using a receive path configured for non-ISC signals. In an example implementation, such a receive path may comprise slicer 164. In another example implementation, such a receive path may comprise the RSSE circuit 170 configured into a mode in which it operates equivalently to slicer 164. Such a mode may, for example, be characterized by a memory depth of the sequence estimation being set to zero (e.g., it may be a parameter stored in a configuration register). In block 618, the device 1023 receives the ISC preamble via filter 166. In block 620, the device 1023 trains its nonlinear distortion compensation circuitry 168, and (optionally) initializes the state of the RSSE circuit 170 using the ISC preamble. In block 622, the device 1023 process the ISC payload using the trained nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 and (initialized) RSSE circuit 170. Because the payload is ISC, the RSSE 170 may operate in a mode in which the payload is filtered with the filter 146 and/or demodulated by the RSSE circuit 170 configured into a mode in which it operable to account for intersymbol correlation better than can be done with a symbol-by-symbol slicing (for an ISC signal, the intersymbol correlation is unlikely to have minimums, let alone zeros, at well-defined intervals). Such a mode may be characterized by, for example, a memory depth of the sequence estimation being set to a non-zero value.
In block 904, the device 1021 receives the linear preamble and linear header of frame 200 via filter 130. In block 906, the device 1021 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary), using the linear preamble of frame 200. In block 908, the device 1021 processes the linear header using the slicer 128. In block 910, the device 1021 receives the linear payload via filter 130. In block 912, the device 1021 processes linear payload using slicer 128.
In block 914, the device 1023 receives the linear preamble and the linear header via filter 162. In block 916, the device 1023 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer using the linear preamble. In block 918, the device 1023 processes the linear header using a receive path configured for linear signals. Such a mode may, for example, be characterized the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 being disabled or bypassed.
In block 920, the device 1023 receives the linear payload via filter 162. In block 922, the device 1023 processes the linear payload using a receive path configured for linear signals. Such a mode may, for example, be characterized by the nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 being disabled or bypassed.
In block 1004, the device 1021 receives the linear preamble and linear header via filter 130. In block 1006, device 1021 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary) using the linear preamble. In block 1008, the device 1021 processes the linear header using slicer 128. In block 1010, device 1021 either fails to detect the payload, or discards the payload after detecting, based on the header, that the payload will be a nonlinear signal, which the device 1021 is not configured to support. Where the device 1021 fails to detect the payload it may nonetheless retain synchronization with the device 1022 based on the frame length field detected in the linear header.
In block 1012, device 1023 receives the linear preamble and the linear header via filter 162. In block 1014, device 1023 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary). In block 1016, the device 1023 processes the linear header using a receive path configured for linear signals. Such a receive path may, for example, bypass the NL compensation circuit 168, or the NL compensation circuit 168 may be in the receive path but be powered down and/or have its parameters set such that the response of its model of nonlinearity reduces to a linear response. In block 1018, the device 1023 receives nonlinear payload via nonlinear filter 166. In block 1020, the NL compensation circuit 168 trains its model of the nonlinear distortion present in the payload based on the payload itself (e.g., predetermined portions of the payload and/or using iterative decision feedback). In block 1022, the device 1023 process the nonlinear payload using a receive path configured for nonlinear signals. Such a receive path may comprise the NL compensation circuit 168 trained in block 1020.
In block 1104, the device 1021 receives the linear preamble and the linear header via filter 130. In block 1106, the device 1021 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary) based on the linear preamble. In block 1108, the device 1021 processes the linear header using slicer 128. In block 1110, device 1021 either fails to detect the payload or discards the payload after detecting, based on the header, that the payload will be transmitted as an nonlinear signal, which the device 1021 is not configured to support. Where the device 1021 fails to detect the payload it may nonetheless retain synchronization with the device 1022 based on the frame length field detected in the linear header.
In block 1112, the device 1023 receives the linear preamble and the linear header via filter 1112. In block 1114, the device 1023 synchronizes its circuitry and trains its equalizer (as necessary) based on the linear preamble. In block 1116, the device 1023 processes the linear header using a receive path configured for linear signals. Such a receive path may, for example, bypass the NL compensation circuit 168, or the NL compensation circuit 168 may be in the receive path but powered down and/or have its parameters set such that the response of its model of nonlinearity reduces to a linear response. In block 1118, the device 1023 receives the nonlinear preamble via filter 166. In block 1120, the device 1023 trains its nonlinear distortion compensation circuitry 168 such that a nonlinear distortion model maintained by the nonlinear distortion compensation circuitry 168 can predict/reproduce (with desired accuracy) the nonlinear distortion present in the nonlinear signals from device 1022, and (optionally) initializes the state of the RSSE circuit 170 using the nonlinear preamble. In block 1122, the device 1023 process the nonlinear payload using the trained nonlinear distortion compensation circuit 168 and (initialized) RSSE circuit 170.
In accordance with various aspects of this disclosure, a transmitter (e.g., 152) comprises a symbol mapper (e.g., 154) operable to map a frame of bits to a frame of symbols, where the symbols correspond to a determined modulation scheme, and circuitry (e.g., 155, 156, and/or 158) operable to convert the frame of symbols to a physical layer signal and transmit the physical layer signal onto a communication medium. The circuitry is operable to process the physical layer signal such that a first portion of the physical layer signal is a first type of signal (e.g., a linear signal and/or non-ISC signal) and a second portion of the physical layer signal is a second type of signal (e.g., nonlinear signal and/or ISC signal). The first portion of the physical layer signal may comprise a header, a preamble, and/or a payload of the frame. The second portion of the physical layer signal may comprise a header, a preamble, and/or a payload of the frame.
As utilized herein the terms “circuits” and “circuitry” refer to physical electronic components (i.e. hardware) and any software and/or firmware (“code”) which may configure the hardware, be executed by the hardware, and or otherwise be associated with the hardware. As used herein, for example, a particular processor and memory may comprise a first “circuit” when executing a first one or more lines of code and may comprise a second “circuit” when executing a second one or more lines of code. As utilized herein, “and/or” means any one or more of the items in the list joined by “and/or”. As an example, “x and/or y” means any element of the three-element set {(x), (y), (x, y)}. In other words, “x and/or y” means “one or both of x and y”. As another example, “x, y, and/or z” means any element of the seven-element set {(x), (y), (z), (x, y), (x, z), (y, z), (x, y, z)}. In other words, “x, y and/or z” means “one or more of x, y and z”. As utilized herein, the term “exemplary” means serving as a non-limiting example, instance, or illustration. As utilized herein, the terms “e.g.,” and “for example” set off lists of one or more non-limiting examples, instances, or illustrations. As utilized herein, circuitry is “operable” to perform a function whenever the circuitry comprises the necessary hardware and code (if any is necessary) to perform the function, regardless of whether performance of the function is disabled or not enabled (e.g., by a user-configurable setting, factory trim, etc.).
Other embodiments of the invention may provide a non-transitory computer readable medium and/or storage medium, and/or a non-transitory machine readable medium and/or storage medium, having stored thereon, a machine code and/or a computer program having at least one code section executable by a machine and/or a computer, thereby causing the machine and/or computer to perform the processes as described herein.
Accordingly, the present invention may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present invention may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computing system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computing systems. Any kind of computing system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computing system with a program or other code that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computing system such that it carries out the methods described herein. Another typical implementation may comprise an application specific integrated circuit or chip.
While the present invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the present invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to the following application(s), each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference: U.S. provisional patent application 61/989,122 titled “Signal Acquisition in a Multimode Environment” filed on May 6, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4109101 | Mitani | Aug 1978 | A |
4135057 | Bayless, Sr. et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4797925 | Lin | Jan 1989 | A |
5111484 | Karabinis | May 1992 | A |
5131011 | Bergmans et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5202903 | Okanoue | Apr 1993 | A |
5249200 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5283813 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291516 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5394439 | Hemmati | Feb 1995 | A |
5432822 | Kaewell, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5459762 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5590121 | Geigel et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602507 | Suzuki | Feb 1997 | A |
5710792 | Fukawa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757855 | Strolle et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784415 | Chevillat et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5818653 | Park et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886748 | Lee | Mar 1999 | A |
5889823 | Agazzi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915213 | Iwatsuki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930309 | Knutson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946359 | Tajiri et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6009120 | Nobakht | Dec 1999 | A |
6167079 | Kinnunen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6233709 | Zhang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272173 | Hatamian | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6335954 | Bottomley et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356586 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6516025 | Warke et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516437 | Van Stralen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529303 | Rowan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532256 | Miller | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535549 | Scott et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6591090 | Vuorio et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608873 | Spinnler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6675184 | Matsui | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690754 | Haratsch et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697441 | Bottomley et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718165 | Ha | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6785342 | Isaksen et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6871208 | Guo et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6968021 | White et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985709 | Perets | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7158324 | Stein et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190288 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190721 | Garrett | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205798 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206363 | Hegde et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215716 | Smith | May 2007 | B1 |
7269205 | Wang | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286598 | Kochale et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318185 | Khandani et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333561 | Pinckley et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336716 | Maltsev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7463697 | Maltsev et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467338 | Saul | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7577085 | Narasimhan | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7583755 | Ma et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7830854 | Sarkar et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7924956 | Maltsev et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7974230 | Talley et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8005170 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8059737 | Yang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8175186 | Wiss et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8175201 | Mathew et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199804 | Cheong | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8248975 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265561 | Nakamura | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8326238 | Yang et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8331500 | Choi et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8351536 | Mazet et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8422589 | Golitschek Elder Von Elbwart et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8427935 | Van de Beek et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432987 | Siti et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8498591 | Qian et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8519789 | Hawkes | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526523 | Eliaz | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8548072 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8548089 | Agazzi et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548097 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8553821 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559494 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559496 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559498 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8565363 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8566687 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8571131 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8571146 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572458 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8582637 | Eliaz | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8599914 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8605832 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8665941 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8665992 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8666000 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675769 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675782 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681889 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8731413 | Dave et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8737458 | Eliaz | May 2014 | B2 |
8744003 | Eliaz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8744009 | Kleider et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8774733 | Shao | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774738 | Dakshinamurthy et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781008 | Eliaz | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804879 | Eliaz | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8811548 | Eliaz | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824572 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824599 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8824611 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831124 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842778 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873612 | Eliaz | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8885698 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885786 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8891701 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897387 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897405 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8948321 | Eliaz | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8972836 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976853 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976911 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8982984 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989249 | Zerbe et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003258 | Eliaz | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9071305 | Eliaz | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9088400 | Eliaz | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9088469 | Eliaz | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9094269 | Ling et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9100071 | Eliaz | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9106292 | Eliaz | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118519 | Eliaz et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124399 | Eliaz et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9130627 | Eliaz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9130637 | Eliaz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9130795 | Eliaz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137057 | Eliaz | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9166833 | Eliaz | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9166834 | Eliaz | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9191247 | Stopler | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9209843 | Eliaz | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9215102 | Eliaz et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219632 | Eliaz et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9231628 | Eliaz | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9246523 | Stopler et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
20010008542 | Wiebke et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010036151 | Cimini | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016938 | Starr | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020060827 | Agazzi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020123318 | Lagarrigue | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150065 | Ponnekanti | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150184 | Hafeez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172297 | Ouchi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016741 | Sasson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030132814 | Nyberg | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135809 | Kim | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030207680 | Yang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210352 | Fitzsimmons et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227981 | Vella-Coleiro | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008616 | Jung | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009783 | Miyoshi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037374 | Gonikberg | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040081259 | Ammer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086276 | Lenosky | May 2004 | A1 |
20040120409 | Yasotharan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040142666 | Creigh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170228 | Vadde | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174937 | Ungerboeck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203458 | Nigra | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227570 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240578 | Thesling | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257955 | Yamanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032472 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047517 | Georgios et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089125 | Zhidkov | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123077 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135472 | Higashino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136933 | Sandhu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163252 | McCallister et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165950 | Takagi | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193318 | Okumura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219089 | Batruni | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050220218 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265470 | Kishigami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276317 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060034378 | Lindskog et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060067396 | Christensen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060109780 | Fechtel | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109935 | McQueen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060171489 | Ghosh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176948 | Lee | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203943 | Scheim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239339 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245346 | Bar-Ness et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060245765 | Elahmadi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280113 | Huo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070047121 | Eleftheriou et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092017 | Abedi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098059 | Ives et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070098090 | Ma et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070098116 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110177 | Molander et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110191 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127608 | Scheim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140330 | Allpress et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153884 | Balasubramanian | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189404 | Baum et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213087 | Laroia et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230593 | Eliaz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258517 | Rollings et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258533 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291719 | Demirhan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002789 | Jao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049598 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080644 | Batruni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130716 | Cho et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130788 | Copeland | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144709 | McCallister et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159377 | Allpress et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080207143 | Skarby et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080260985 | Shirai et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266450 | Eliaz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267278 | Heiman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285640 | McCallister | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090003425 | Shen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028234 | Zhu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034625 | Komi | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052577 | Wang | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058521 | Fernandez | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075590 | Sahinoglu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086808 | Liu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115513 | Hongo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090122854 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135972 | Tanaka et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137212 | Belotserkovsky | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144059 | Yu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185612 | McKown | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213907 | Bottomley | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213908 | Bottomley | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220034 | Ramprashad et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090222262 | Kim et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245226 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090245401 | Chrabieh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286494 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290620 | Tzannes et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090323841 | Clerckx et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002692 | Bims | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002792 | Seyedi-Esfahani | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034253 | Cohen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039100 | Sun et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100062705 | Rajkotia et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074349 | Hyllander et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080266 | Zhang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100080312 | Moffatt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100158085 | Khayrallah | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166050 | Aue | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172309 | Forenza et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202505 | Yu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202507 | Allpress et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100203854 | Yu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208774 | Guess et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208832 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100215107 | Yang | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220825 | Dubuc et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278288 | Panicker et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283540 | Davies | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284481 | Murakami et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309796 | Khayrallah | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329325 | Mobin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051864 | Chalia et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064171 | Huang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069791 | He | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074500 | Bouillet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074506 | Kleider et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075745 | Kleider | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090986 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095819 | Velazquez | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101957 | Boufounos | May 2011 | A1 |
20110134899 | Jones, IV et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150064 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164492 | Ma et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170630 | Silverman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175678 | Velazquez | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182329 | Wehinger | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188550 | Wajcer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110228869 | Barsoum et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243266 | Roh | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249709 | Shiue et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275338 | Seshadri et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310823 | Nam et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310978 | Wu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025909 | Jo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120027132 | Rouquette | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051464 | Kamuf et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057449 | Takaoka | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076220 | Kimura et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106617 | Jao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120120990 | Koren et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120163489 | Ramakrishnan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177138 | Chrabieh et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120207248 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120269286 | Huang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120294240 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130028299 | Tsai | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044877 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130077563 | Kim et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130121257 | He et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130200950 | Bai | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130343480 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343487 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140036969 | Wyville et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140036986 | Eliaz | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056387 | Asahina | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098841 | Song et al. | Apr 2014 | A2 |
20140098907 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098915 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105267 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105268 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105332 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105334 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108892 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140133540 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140388 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140446 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146911 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140161158 | Eliaz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140161170 | Eliaz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140198255 | Kegasawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226752 | Kim | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241477 | Eliaz | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247715 | Tsai | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140247904 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269861 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286459 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140294119 | Sochacki | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140301507 | Eliaz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321525 | Eliaz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140328428 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140355718 | Guan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140376358 | Eder et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150010108 | Eliaz | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150049843 | Reuven et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055722 | Eliaz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063499 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150070089 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150071389 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078491 | Eliaz | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150124912 | Eliaz et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150131709 | Eliaz | May 2015 | A1 |
20150131710 | Eliaz | May 2015 | A1 |
20150131759 | Eliaz et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150146806 | Terry | May 2015 | A1 |
20150156041 | Eliaz | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172078 | Eliaz | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172079 | Eliaz | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150207527 | Eliaz | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222456 | Intrater | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150256293 | Eliaz | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150270856 | Breynaert | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150270926 | Eliaz | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150311926 | Eliaz et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312000 | Eliaz | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312065 | Eliaz | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150358191 | Eliaz et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1710894 | Dec 2005 | CN |
101198160 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101562589 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101582748 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101790256 | Jul 2010 | CN |
1865677 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1928141 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1953981 | Aug 2008 | EP |
9941839 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2007000495 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008154965 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2012092647 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2013030815 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Supplementary European Search Report for EP 13823230 dated Nov. 26, 2015. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP 13807399 dated Nov. 20, 2015. |
Adama A., et al., “Design of Low Intersymbol Interference Partial Response Data Transmission Filters”, IEE Proceedings G. Electroic Circuits & Systems, Instit. of Elec. Eng. Stevenage, GB, vol. 133, No. 4, Aug. 1, 1986, pp. 195-202, XP000853659 ISSN: 0622-0039. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2015/01473 dated Dec. 10, 2015. |
Equalization: The Correction and Analysis of Degraded Signals, White Paper, Agilent Technologies, Ransom Stephens V1.0, Aug. 15, 2005 (12 pages). |
Modulation and Coding for Linear Gaussian Channels, G. David Forney, Jr., and Gottfried Ungerboeck, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, vol. 44, No. 6, Oct. 1998 pp. 2384-2415 (32 pages). |
Intuitive Guide to Principles of Communications, www.complextoreal.com, Inter Symbol Interference (ISI) and Root-raised Cosine (RRC) filtering, (2002), pp. 1-23 (23 pages). |
Chan, N., “Partial Response Signaling with a Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation Receiver” (1980). Open Access Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2855, (123 pages). |
The Viterbi Algorithm, Ryan, M.S. and Nudd, G.R., Department of Computer Science, Univ. of Warwick, Coventry, (1993) (17 pages). |
R. A. Gibby and J. W. Smith, “Some extensions of Nyquist's telegraph transmission theory,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 44, pp. 1487-1510, Sep. 1965. |
J. E. Mazo and H. J. Landau, “On the minimum distance problem for faster-than-Nyquist signaling,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 34, pp. 1420-1427, Nov. 1988. |
D. Hajela, “On computing the minimum distance for faster than Nyquist signaling,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 36, pp. 289-295, Mar. 1990. |
G. Ungerboeck, “Adaptive maximum-likelihood receiver for carrier modulated data-transmission systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 624-636, May 1974. |
G.D. Forney, Jr., “Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 363-378, May 1972. |
A. Duel-Hallen and C. Heegard, “Delayed decision-feedback sequence estimation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 37, pp. 428-436, May 1989. |
M. V. Eyubog •lu and S. U. Qureshi, “Reduced-state sequence estimation with set partitioning and decision feedback,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 36, pp. 13-20, Jan. 1988. |
W. H. Gerstacker, F. Obernosterer, R. Meyer, and J. B. Huber, “An efficient method for prefilter computation for reduced-state equalization,” Proc. of the 11th IEEE Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Commun. PIMRC, vol. 1, pp. 604-609, London, UK, Sep. 18-21, 2000. |
W. H. Gerstacker, F. Obernosterer, R. Meyer, and J. B. Huber, “On prefilter computation for reduced-state equalization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 793-800, Oct. 2002. |
Joachim Hagenauer and Peter Hoeher, “A Viterbi algorithm with soft-decision outputs and its applications,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 1989, Dallas, Texas, pp. 1680-1686,Nov. 1989. |
S. Mita, M. Izumita, N. Doi, and Y. Eto, “Automatic equalizer for digital magnetic recording systems” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 25, pp. 3672-3674, 1987. |
E. Biglieri, E. Chiaberto, G. P. Maccone, and E. Viterbo, “Compensation of nonlinearities in high-density magnetic recording channels,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 30, pp. 5079-5086, Nov. 1994. |
W. E. Ryan and A. Gutierrez, “Performance of adaptive Volterra equalizers on nonlinear magnetic recording channels,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 31, pp. 3054-3056, Nov. 1995. |
X. Che, “Nonlinearity measurements and write precompensation studies for a PRML recording channel,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 31, pp. 3021-3026, Nov. 1995. |
O. E. Agazzi and N. Sheshadri, “On the use of tentative decisions to cancel intersymbol interference and nonlinear distortion (with application to magnetic recording channels),” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 43, pp. 394-408, Mar. 1997. |
Miao, George J., Signal Processing for Digital Communications, 2006, Artech House, pp. 375-377. |
Xiong, Fuqin. Digital Modulation Techniques, Artech House, 2006, Chapter 9, pp. 447-483. |
Faulkner, Michael, “Low-Complex ICI Cancellation for Improving Doppler Performance in OFDM Systems”, Center for Telecommunication and Microelectronics, 1-4244-0063-5/06/$2000 (c) 2006 IEEE. (5 pgs). |
Stefano Tomasin, et al. “Iterative Interference Cancellation and Channel Estimation for Mobile OFDM”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 238-245. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01866 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/001923 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/001878 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/002383 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01860 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01970 dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01930 dated May 15, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/02081 dated May 22, 2014. |
Al-Dhahir, Naofal et al., “MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers: Finite-Length Results” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 4, Jul. 1995. |
Cioffi, John M. et al., “MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers and Coding—Park I: Equalization Results” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 1995. |
Eyuboglu, M. Vedat et al., “Reduced-State Sequence Estimation with Set Partitioning and Decision Feedback” IEEE Transactions onCommunications, vol. 36, No. 1, Jan. 1988. |
Khaled M. Gharaibeh, Nonlinear Distortion in Wireless Systems, 2011, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd Edition, chapter 3, pp. 59-81. |
Forney, G. David Jr., “Coset Codes—Part I: Introduction and Geometrical Classification” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 34, No. 5, Sep. 1988. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2014/002449 dated Mar. 12, 2015. |
Digital predistortion of power amplifiers for wireless applications (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology). Retrieved from the internet <http://http://202.28.199.34/multim/3126235.pdf> Ding, L Mar. 31, 2005. |
Digital predistortion for power amplifiers using separable functions. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 58(8), 4121-4130. Retrieved from the internet </http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.0037.pdf> Jiang, H., & Wilford, P.A. Aug. 8, 2010. |
Digital predistortion linearization methods for RF power amplifiers. Teknillinen korkeakoulu. Retrieved from the Internet <http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2008/isbn9789512295463/isbn9789512295463.pdf> Teikari I. Sep. 30, 2008. |
Kayhan, F., et al., Joint Signal-Labeling Optimization for Pragmatic Capacity under Peak-Power Constraint, 978-1-4244-5637, 2010. |
Kayhan, F., et al., Constellation Design for Transmission over Nonlinear Satellite Channels, Oct. 5, 2012. |
Liu, N. et al., Iterative intersymbol interference cancellation in vestigial sideband Nyquist-subcarrier modulation system. Nov. 2014, Optical Engineering, vol. 53(11) 116109. |
Singla, R., et al. Digital predistortion of power amplifiers using look-up table method with memory effects for LTE wireless systems, Journ. on Wireless Communications and Networking 2012:330 http:jwcn.eurasipjournals.com/content/2012/1/330. |
Tellado, J., et al, PAR Reduction in Multicarrier Transmission Systems, Feb. 9, 1998. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2014/002688 dated Jun. 29, 2015. |
Gregorio, F. H., et al. Receiver-side nonlinearities mitigation using an extended interative decision-based technique. Signal Processing, 91(8), 2042-2056, Mar. 23, 2011. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2015/00572 dated Oct. 10, 2015. |
Chen, H., et al. An Iterative Method to Restore the Performance of Clipped and Filtered OFDM Signals, Dept. Elec. & Comp. Eng. 0-7803-7802-4/03/© 2003 IEEE, pp. 3438-3443. |
Aziz, W., et al. PAPR Reduction in OFDM using Clipping and Filtering, World Applied Sciences Journal 18 (11): pp. 1495-1500, 2012 ISSN 1818-4952 © IDOSI Publications, 2012. |
Abouty, S., et al. A Novel Iterative Clipping and Filtering Technique for PAPR Reduction of OFDM Signals: System Using DCT/IDCT Transform, Int'l Jour. of Future Generation Comm. and Networking, vol. 6, No. 1, Feb. 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Gurung, A.K., et al., Power Savings Analysis of Clipping and Filtering Method in OFDM Systems, 978-1-4244-2603-4/08/© 2008 IEEE, pp. 204-208. |
Wang, Y.-C., et al. Optimized Iterative Clipping and Filtering for PAPR Reduction of OFDM Signals, Jan. 13, 2011, pp. 1-9. |
Lee, T., et al. Experimental Analysis of Clipping and Filtering Effects on OFDM Systems, 978-1-4244-6404-3/10/© 2010 IEEE, pp. 1-5. |
da Silva, Pedro F.G., et al. Design of Crest Factor Reduction Techniques Based on Clipping and Filtering for Wireless Communications Systems, 978-1-4799-1132-5/13/ © 2013 IEEE, pp. 1-5. |
Rana, M. M., Clipping Based PAPR Reduction Method for LTE OFDMA Systems, Int'l Journ. of Elec. & Comp. Sci. IJECS-IJENS vol. 10 No. 05 (Oct. 2010) pp. 1-5. |
McClearnon, D., et al., Wideband Digital Pre-Distortion Modeling for LTE-Advanced, Agilent Technologies, Jul. 2012, p. 64. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150326271 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61989122 | May 2014 | US |