This invention relates to industrial flame scanner instrumentation and more particularly to such instrumentation that is required to distinguish, that is, discriminate, flames from different fuels being alternately burned in the same burner or discriminate the flame between burner and adjacent ignitor where the ignitor may be burning the same or different fuel than the main burner.
Flame scanners are important instruments in the operation of the combustion systems of fossil fuel-fired steam generators. To this end, flame scanners are one of the primary inputs into the burner management system normally provided with the steam generator. The principal function of a flame scanner is to monitor the combustion process in the steam generator and to provide when a stable flame exists a signal which gives an indication that it is safe to continue feeding fossil fuel into the combustion chamber of the steam generator.
In the event that the flame becomes unstable, or the flame is lost completely, the flame scanner is designed to provide a loss of flame signal to the burner management system. In response to the loss of flame signal, the burner management system shuts off the fossil fuel to the steam generator before an unsafe operating condition develops within the steam generator.
One requirement in determining if a stable flame exists or if the flame has become unstable or lost is that the flame scanner must be able to discriminate flames between adjacent burners or between burner or ignitor or between different fuels in a burner. One example of a flame scanner that can discriminate flames between adjacent burners is the silicon carbide photodiode based flame scanner described in commonly owner U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,669 (“the '669 patent”) which issued on Oct. 29, 2002. The disclosure of the '669 patent is incorporated herein by reference.
Common practice in discriminating flames between different burners or between burner and ignitor or between different fuels in a burner, is to design a system that can detect and act upon a flame signal signature that is specific to the fuel type or burner/ignitor mechanical configuration. There are a number of factors that contribute to flame signal signatures. Examples are fuel type, fuel to air ratios, scanner location in relation to flame ignition points, flame profile in relation to the scanner position, flame scanner sighting angle, burner load, and boiler load. All of these factors, and others, combine to create a unique flame signature.
The art of flame discrimination techniques is in the ability to recognize the differences between the signatures emanating from two flame sources. Most often these differences are minute and lead to marginal discrimination performance. Sometimes the differences between flame sources have overlapping characteristics as the burner or boiler progresses through its operating load range making discrimination impossible during a segment of time.
Typically, the raw flame scanner signal, as it comes from the scanner head, is conditioned and then processed to detect particular attributes associated with either the fuel or burner for which the scanner is assigned to discriminate. Once an attribute is detected, it is then compared to predetermined trip limits for recognition as flame or no flame. It is desirable to find the associated attributes in a timely and consistent fashion. Examples of typical attributes include intensity, flicker frequency, and AC amplitude.
In accordance with the present invention the flame signal is conditioned in parallel paths allowing the signal attributes to be enhanced according to the assigned programmed trip settings while at the same time suppressing the attributes of the alternate flame. This conditioning increases the attribute separation, making detection more predictable, timely and consistent.
A method to discriminate flame between a first flame having a predetermined number of associated flame attributes and a second flame having a predetermined number of associated flame attributes. The first and second flames are viewed by a single flame scanner and the flame scanner produces a signal indicative of the first and second flames. The method:
A fossil fuel fired steam generator that has:
Referring now to
As is shown in
In the circuit of
Referring now to
Programmable filter 42 comprises digital filters 42a which filters the conditioned flame signal for intensity and adjustable frequency algorithm 42b connected to the output of: digital filters 42a. The output of adjustable frequency algorithm 42b is connected to trip points A 46 as is one output of digital filters 42a. Programmable filter 44 also comprises digital filters 44a which filters the conditioned flame signal for intensity and adjustable frequency algorithm 44b connected to the output of digital filters 44a. The output of adjustable frequency algorithm 44b is connected to trip points B 48 as is one output of digital filters 44a.
For a more specific example, consider the case where the scanner must discriminate between an oil flame and a coal flame. The oil flame normally has a characteristically higher flicker frequency then the coal flame. For this example the coal flicker frequency is higher than normal and is approaching the oil flicker frequency making separation of the fuels difficult and only marginally reliable over the entire operation load range using the techniques shown in the conventional circuit 10 of
However, in the technique shown in the circuit 30 of the present invention, the digitally filtered and conditioned flame signal passes through an adjustable frequency algorithm for example algorithm 42b, that is adjusted to enhance the high frequencies that are routinely found in the oil flame, while suppressing the low frequency harmonics routinely found in the coal flame.
In the same fashion, the adjustable frequency algorithm, for example 44b, on the coal side of the parallel branches 38 and 40, enhances the low frequency coal harmonics while suppressing the high frequency oil harmonics. Thus the two resulting coal and oil flame signals have the resulting frequencies that are further separated making discrimination between the two more predicable over the entire burner load range.
In addition to flicker frequency, the present invention can have different trip points for other flame attributes, such as intensity and/or flame signal amplitude. The flame signals may also be conditioned or shaped, that is, pre-processed, using the parallel programmable filters 42 and 44 to enhance individual flame attributes. Examples of such filtering techniques include but are not limited to Fourier analysis, box car averaging, scaling, band pass, low pass or other filter techniques. The conditioning algorithms are configurable such that two separate configurations are executed simultaneously on the same sensor data. Each configuration is used to enhance the differences between the two flames and make it easier to detect the presence of each one.
In both the traditional approach and the present invention that flame scanner 10 may be embodied for example as described in the '669 patent or may use ionic flame monitoring as is described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,356,199 (“the '199 patent”) which issued on Mar. 12, 2002. The disclosure of the '199 patent is incorporated herein by reference.
It is to be understood that the description of the preferred embodiment(s) is (are) intended to be only illustrative, rather than exhaustive, of the present invention. Those of ordinary skill will be able to make certain additions, deletions, and/or modifications to the embodiment(s) of the disclosed subject matter without departing from the spirit of the invention or its scope, as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the priority of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/528,736 filed on Dec. 11, 2003, entitled “Signal Processing Technique For Improved Flame Scanner Discrimination” the contents of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and the benefit of
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60528736 | Dec 2003 | US |