The present disclosure relates generally to wireless networks and more particularly to signaling schemes allowing discovery of network devices capable of operating in multiple network modes.
The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent the work is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
Referring now to
In
In
In
In
A network device includes a receiving module and a detecting module. The receiving module is configured to receive a beacon transmitted by a remote device operating in one of a plurality of network modes, or a probe response transmitted by the remote device in response to a probe request transmitted by the network device. The beacon or the probe response includes an information element indicating that the remote device is capable of operating in the plurality of network modes. The plurality of network modes includes an ad-hoc mode, an infrastructure mode, a mesh mode, and a WiFi direct peer-to-peer mode. The detecting module is configured to detect the remote device as capable of operating in the plurality of network modes based on the information element.
A network device includes a receiving module and a response generating module. The receiving module is configured to receive a probe request transmitted by a remote device. The response generating module is configured to generate a probe response. The probe response includes an information element indicating that the network device is capable of operating in a plurality of network modes. The plurality of network modes includes an ad-hoc mode, an infrastructure mode, a mesh mode, and a WiFi direct peer-to-peer mode.
A method for a network device includes receiving (i) a beacon transmitted by a remote device operating in one of a plurality of network modes or (ii) a probe response transmitted by the remote device in response to a probe request transmitted by the network device. The beacon or the probe response includes an information element indicating that the remote device is capable of operating in the plurality of network modes. The plurality of network modes includes an ad-hoc mode, an infrastructure mode, a mesh mode, and a WiFi direct peer-to-peer mode. The method further includes detecting the remote device as capable of operating in the plurality of network modes based on the information element.
A method for a network device includes receiving a probe request transmitted by a remote device, and generating a probe response. The probe response includes an information element indicating that the network device is capable of operating in a plurality of network modes. The plurality of network modes includes an ad-hoc mode, an infrastructure mode, a mesh mode, and a WiFi direct peer-to-peer mode.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description, the claims and the drawings. The detailed description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical OR. It should be understood that steps within a method may be executed in different order without altering the principles of the present disclosure.
As used herein, the term module may refer to, be part of, or include an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC); an electronic circuit; a combinational logic circuit; a field programmable gate array (FPGA); a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) that executes code; other suitable components that provide the described functionality; or a combination of some or all of the above, such as in a system-on-chip. The term module may include memory (shared, dedicated, or group) that stores code executed by the processor.
The term code, as used above, may include software, firmware, and/or microcode, and may refer to programs, routines, functions, classes, and/or objects. The term shared, as used above, means that some or all code from multiple modules may be executed using a single (shared) processor. In addition, some or all code from multiple modules may be stored by a single (shared) memory. The term group, as used above, means that some or all code from a single module may be executed using a group of processors. In addition, some or all code from a single module may be stored using a group of memories.
The apparatuses and methods described herein may be implemented by one or more computer programs executed by one or more processors. The computer programs include processor-executable instructions that are stored on a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium. The computer programs may also include stored data. Non-limiting examples of the non-transitory tangible computer readable medium are nonvolatile memory, magnetic storage, and optical storage.
A network device can discover another network device on a channel by scanning the channel. Scanning can be passive and/or active. In passive scanning, a network device can discover other network devices when the network device receives beacons or probe requests from the other network devices. In active scanning, the network device transmits probe requests and can discover other network devices based on probe responses received from the other network devices.
Beacons, probe requests, and/or probe responses transmitted by a network device include an information element (IE) that indicates a mode of operation of the network device. The mode of operation of the network device typically depends on the type of network in which the network device communicates and is referred to as a network mode. For example, if the network device communicates in an ad-hoc network, the IE includes a bit indicating that the network device operates in an ad-hoc network mode or simply ad-hoc mode. Similarly, if the network device communicates in an infrastructure network, the IE includes a bit indicating that the network device operates in an infrastructure network mode or simply infrastructure mode.
In passive scanning, a first network device can discover a second network device if the IE received from the second network device indicates that the second network device operates in the same network mode as the first network device. In active scanning, when a first network device receives a probe request transmitted by a second network device, the first network device transmits a probe response if the first network device operates in the same network mode as the second network device. The second network device discovers the first network device based on the probe response received from the first network device.
According to IEEE 802.11 specifications, a network device capable of operating in multiple network modes is forced to indicate only one network mode in a probe response. The indicated network mode typically depends on the type of network in which the network device operates. Accordingly, a network device capable of operating in multiple network modes cannot indicate in a probe response the ability of the network device to operate in multiple network modes. Consequently, the network device cannot be discovered by network devices operating in a network mode other than the network mode indicated by the network device in the probe response.
The present disclosure relates to generating a probe response that allows a network device capable of operating in multiple network modes to be discovered by a scanning network device as a generic network device. A generic network device is a network device capable of operating in more than one network mode. Specifically, the network device can transmit a probe response that includes a new information element (IE). The new IE indicates that the network device can optionally operate in multiple network modes. Accordingly, when the scanning network device receives the probe response, the scanning network device can discover the network device as a generic network device. After discovery, the scanning network device and the discovered network device can select one of the multiple network modes and communicate using the selected network mode.
Thus, a network device can be discovered by other network devices regardless of the mode of operation of the network device and regardless of the modes of operation of the other network devices. Further, the discovered network device can negotiate with the scanning network device and select a suitable network mode of operation after discovery.
Two examples of discovering a network device according to the present disclosure are presented below. In a first example, a first network device operating in a WiFi direct peer-to-peer (P2P) mode transmits a probe request. A second network device is capable of operating in the WiFi direct P2P mode and another network mode (e.g., the ad-hoc mode). The second network device receives the probe request and transmits a probe response. The probe response includes a new IE, which indicates that the second network device can operate in the WiFi direct P2P mode and optionally in the ad-hoc mode, for example. Accordingly, the first network device discovers the second network device as being capable of operating in the WiFi direct P2P mode and optionally in the ad-hoc mode (i.e., as a generic network device). Subsequently, the first network device associates with the second network device using the WiFi direct P2P mode.
Unlike a conventional probe response, the probe response generated by the second network device does not include an independent basic service set (IBSS) bit to indicate that the second network device is capable of operating only in the ad-hoc mode, for example. Instead, the probe response includes the new IE, which indicates that the second network device can optionally operate in the ad-hoc mode in addition to being able to operate in the WiFi direct P2P mode.
Further, if the first network device is also capable of operating in the ad-hoc mode, the first network device and the second network device can negotiate a mode of operation during a setup process that follows the discovery of the second network device. During the setup process, the first network device and the second network device determine whether to operate in the WiFi direct P2P mode or the ad-hoc mode.
Thus, the second network device is not forced to indicate in the probe response that the second network device can operate only in a single network mode (e.g., the ad-hoc mode), which can preclude the first network device from discovering the second network device. Additionally, other modes of operation of the second network device (e.g., the WiFi direct P2P mode) are not foreclosed from utilization. Rather, the second network device can utilize any of the multiple network modes after being discovered by the first network device.
In a second example, a first network device operates in the ad-hoc mode in an ad-hoc network. Additionally, the first network device is capable of operating in other network modes (e.g., the infrastructure mode). The beacons transmitted by the first network device include the new IE. Specifically, the beacons do not include an IBSS bit to indicate that the first network device is operating in the ad-hoc mode. Instead, the beacons include the new IE, which indicates that the first network device can optionally operate in the infrastructure mode in addition to being able to operate in the ad-hoc mode.
Accordingly, a second network device that is not associated with the ad-hoc network can discover the first network device as a generic network device based on the beacons received from the first network device. After discovering the first network device, the second network device can communicate with the first network device using the ad-hoc mode or the infrastructure mode depending on the mode in which the second network device can operate.
Additionally, the first network device can attempt to discover other network devices external to the ad-hoc network by transmitting probe requests. The probe requests do not include the IBSS bit. Instead, the probe requests include the new IE, which indicates that the first network device can optionally operate in the infrastructure mode, for example, in addition to being able to operate in the ad-hoc mode.
When the second network device receives one of the probe requests, the second network device can transmit a probe response that includes an IE, which indicates that the second network device can operate in one or more network modes. On receiving the probe response, the first network device can discover the second network device as a generic network device based on the IE in the probe response. After discovering the second network device, the first network device and the second network device can select a suitable network mode and communicate using the selected network mode.
Referring now to
A remote network device (hereinafter remote device) 110 can communicate with the network device 100 via an antenna 112. While not shown, the remote device 110 can also include a PHY module, a MAC module, and a processing module similar to the network device 100. Further, although the network device 100 and the remote device 110 are shown to include a single antenna, the network device 100 and the remote device 110 can include multiple antennas.
In
For example only, the system can be implemented in the MAC module 106 of the network device 100 as shown. Alternatively, the system can be included in the PHY module 104 of the network device 100. In some implementations, the system can be implemented partly in the PHY module 104 and partly in the MAC module 106. While not shown, the discovery system can be similarly implemented in the remote device 110.
The receiving module 120 can receive a beacon transmitted by the remote device 110 operating in one of a plurality of network modes. Alternatively, the receiving module 120 can receive a probe response transmitted by the remote device 110 in response to a probe request transmitted by the network device 100 operating in one of a plurality of network modes. The network device 100 can transmit the probe request via the transmit module 122.
The beacon or the probe response received from the remote device 110 includes an information element (IE) according to the present disclosure. The IE indicates that the remote device 110 is capable of operating in a plurality of network modes. The plurality of network modes includes the ad-hoc mode, the infrastructure mode, a mesh mode, and a WiFi direct peer-to-peer mode.
The detecting module 124 processes the information element received from the remote device 110 and discovers the remote device 110 as a generic network device. Specifically, the detecting module 124 detects the remote device 110 as being capable of operating in the plurality of network modes based on the information element.
After the discovery of the remote device 110 is completed, the negotiation module 126 negotiates one of the network modes for communicating with the remote device 110. The association module 128 associates the network device 100 with the remote device 110 using the negotiated network mode. Subsequently, the network device 100 and the remote device 110 communicate using the negotiated network mode.
Alternatively, the receiving module 120 can receive a probe request transmitted by the remote device 110. The response generating module 130 generates a probe response on receiving the probe request from the remote device 110. The probe response includes an information element (IE) according to the present disclosure. The IE indicates that the network device 100 is capable of operating in a plurality of network modes. The plurality of network modes includes the ad-hoc mode, the infrastructure mode, the mesh mode, and the WiFi direct peer-to-peer mode. The transmit module 122 transmits the probe response.
The remote device 110 receives the probe response transmitted by the network device 100. The remote device 110 discovers the network device 100 as being capable of operating in the plurality of network modes (i.e., as a generic network device) based on the information element in the probe response.
After discovering the network device 100, the remote device 110 negotiates one of the network modes for communicating with the network device 100. The remote device 110 associates with the network device 100 using the negotiated network mode. Subsequently, the network device 100 and the remote device 110 communicate using the negotiated network mode.
Referring now to
In
At 158, control negotiates a mode of operation with the remote device. At 160, control associates the network device with the remote device using the negotiated mode, and the network device communicates with the remote device using the negotiated mode. Control ends at 162.
In
At 178, control determines if the remote device discovered the network device and is negotiating a mode of operation with the network device. Control ends at 184 if the remote device fails to discover the network device, or if the remote device determines not to associate with the network device.
At 180, if the remote device discovers the network device, and if the remote device decides to associate with the network device, control negotiates a mode of operation with the remote device. At 182, control associates the network device with the remote device using the negotiated mode, and the network device communicates with the remote device using the negotiated mode. Control ends at 184.
The broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/301,129, filed on Feb. 3, 2010. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5735583 | Katayama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738583 | Comas et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5907566 | Benson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6182248 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6272120 | Alexander | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287200 | Sharma | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6397357 | Cooper | May 2002 | B1 |
6587691 | Granstam et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600726 | Nevo et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6690935 | Calot et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704866 | Benayoun et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707801 | Hsu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6760587 | Holtzman et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785892 | Miller et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788675 | Yang | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6793580 | Sinclair et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795701 | Baker et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799056 | Curley et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6859460 | Chen | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6879574 | Naghian et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879812 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6909705 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6932698 | Sprogis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6973580 | Carroll et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7013391 | Herle et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024199 | Massie et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7072323 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073129 | Robarts et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085257 | Karves et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7087562 | Abe et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097562 | Gagner | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7136642 | Massie et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143171 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162238 | Massie et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181544 | Vangal et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7224964 | Souissi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236772 | Botzas | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7251235 | Wentink | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7308263 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7324444 | Liang et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7400722 | Qi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7435179 | Ford | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7440430 | Jagadeesan et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7452278 | Chen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7551930 | Lempio et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7580866 | Church | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7656847 | Mela et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7710982 | Ohmuro et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7779334 | Earle et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7817545 | Ho et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7881284 | Lin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899017 | Yu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7970384 | Lambert et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8099109 | Altman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099318 | Moukas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8165034 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194600 | Nagaraja | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8194629 | Agulnik et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257177 | Saund et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8279884 | Narasimha et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8325659 | Chen et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8351394 | Yao | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374584 | Lambert et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8411656 | Liu | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8411662 | Saund et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8428079 | Lambert | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8489669 | Johnson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8616975 | Saund et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8825016 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8937963 | Narasimha et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9185732 | Saund et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
20020087370 | Brueckheimer et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020147642 | Avallone et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147913 | Lun Yip | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151366 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152388 | Linnartz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157044 | Byrd | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169539 | Menard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169653 | Greene et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191560 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199124 | Adkisson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030065805 | Barnes | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069018 | Matta et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088690 | Zuckerman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105667 | Millikan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115320 | Yarroll et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133422 | Bims | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152093 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169755 | Ternovsky | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182454 | Huth et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224855 | Cunningham | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231189 | Williams | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231625 | Calvignac | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235175 | Naghian et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040066751 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081106 | Bruhn | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082383 | Muncaster et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040105415 | Fujiwara et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120309 | Kurittu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127277 | Walker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174829 | Ayyagari | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185851 | Nagai | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196808 | Chaskar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203350 | Shultz et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225932 | Hoda et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236850 | Krumm et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243887 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050025163 | Christie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032577 | Blackburn et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041660 | Pennec et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041793 | Fulton et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041796 | Joseph et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058112 | Lahey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060547 | Saito et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073980 | Thomson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079873 | Caspi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099977 | Williams et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157661 | Cho | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177445 | Church | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177639 | Reunamaki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181872 | Acharya et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197189 | Schultz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207342 | Tanabe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050250487 | Miwa et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250497 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268003 | Wang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286456 | McNew et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060041750 | Carter et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045138 | Black et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046709 | Krumm et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063539 | Beyer, Jr. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060135262 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166740 | Sufuentes | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172736 | Nevo | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205409 | Chiou et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215576 | Yu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221857 | Bushnell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268711 | Doradla et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070026866 | Krishnamurthi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035513 | Sherrard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047547 | Conner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070047697 | Drewry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060128 | Kil | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060355 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060358 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076683 | Chung et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078000 | Saund et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082671 | Feng et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086394 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086401 | Hong et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099703 | Terebilo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070192183 | Monaco et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197237 | Powell et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202910 | Brewer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258415 | Lu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286111 | Corson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039015 | Nakata et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052603 | Wiatrowski et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062940 | Othmer et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069105 | Costa et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082671 | Meijer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095112 | Wiemann et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101400 | Auterinen | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123608 | Edge et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080176561 | Shao et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080214216 | Bragg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228547 | Doss et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012704 | Franco et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043658 | Webb et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090181728 | Park | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090191878 | Hedqvist et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222358 | Bednarek | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090307091 | Lilley | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319348 | Khosravy et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323648 | Park et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023401 | Ariyibi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070369 | Fenton et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100093374 | Dacosta | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111066 | Mehta | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144372 | Bouwer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100274626 | Carlson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100285776 | de Froment | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110029359 | Roeding et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060652 | Morton | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066369 | Klassen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066485 | Rissanen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093876 | Belz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110269431 | Hardy et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120095844 | Barnes, Jr. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106728 | Ghaffari et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130096966 | Barnes, Jr. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Meredith, John; “Voice Call Continuity in 3GPP”; CompactPCI and AdvancedTCA systems; Apr. 2006; 2 pages. |
“Universal Mobile Access: UMA Expands Beyond Dual-Mode Handsets”; The UMA Company; Jan. 2007; 8 pages. |
IEEE Standards Board. IEEE 802.11 Standard, 1999.1999 Edition. |
Newton, Harry. Newton's Telecom Dictionary. 15th Edition. Miller Freeman Inc., 1999. 762. (3 pages). |
“Client-Server Protocol Session and Transactions”, Approved Version 1.3; Open Mobile Alliance Ltd; Jan. 23, 2007; 206 pages. |
“IMPS Architecture”, Approved Version 1.3, Open Mobile Alliance Ltd.; Jan. 23, 2007; 24 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61301129 | Feb 2010 | US |