This application is the national phase under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT International Application No. PCT/DK00/00579 which has an International filing date of Oct. 11, 2000, which designated the United States of America.
The present invention relates to a silencer, such as a silencer for attenuating the sound level in exhaust gases emerging from a combustion engine.
Perforated pipes are commonly used in combustion engine exhaust silencers to provide distribution of flow to or from internal silencer chambers and/or to provide acoustic resistance to gas flow through the perforations contributing to overall noise attenuation. Such perforations are normally made as simple holes and create pressure energy losses affecting engine performance adversely.
The aim of the present invention is to design silencer flow elements which may replace simple perforated pipe elements in silencers retaining or even improving the beneficial flow distribution and acoustic resistance effects, but with smaller pressure energy losses, preferably with no or only slightly increased cost of manufacture and with no or only minor increase of silencer weight.
According to the invention, by replacing simple holes with apertures of some length and of flow-friendly geometry the objects of the invention may be fulfilled in advantageous ways. In some embodiments of the invention, these apertures of some length are shaped as small diffusers.
The silencer according to the invention incorporates flow distributing means. When such flow distributing means are incorporated in a prior art silencer, they may result in lower pressure-drop across the silencer. At the same time, the silencing performance of the silencer may be substantially retained or even improved.
Further scope of the applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
a show a prior art silencer in which simple perforated pipes are used.
a show a second embodiment of the invention.
It is clear that when creating perforations by punching there is a limit as to how long (in the flow direction) perforations can be made, if one is not to increase plate thickness. In silencers for vehicles, permissible plate thickness will often be restricted for both cost and weight reasons. Apertures of a substantial length L in the flow direction can be created by fitting each perforation with a small pipe, but this has to be done in a rational manner for manufacture not to be too time consuming.
In the second embodiment of the invention shown in
The flow distributing pipe made up by the rotational symmetric members is terminated by a transverse solid wall 12. Alternatively, if axial outflow from the end of the pipe is preferred, for instance because this can assist a preferred flow distribution within the chamber, the terminating wall can be made with simple perforations or with diffuser-formed apertures. Further possible variations are to simply omit the wall or to terminate with an axial diffuser or with a “splitter” diffuser of a well-known type.
Both embodiments shown in
The winding helical element 14 shown in
Finally,
Inlet pipe 2 has been shown to have an axis of symmetry being perpendicular to the axis of symmetry of the casing. Alternatively, the two axes can be arranged with other angles. Thereby, a very compact apparatus can be accommodated to various outer geometrical conditions concerning external piping arrangements. Monolith 23 can be a particulate trap or a catalytic converter, or it can be made of two or more different types of monoliths.
A further alternative to the embodiment shown in
In the case of a flow distributing member according to the invention providing outflow from a pipe or passage, it will often be advantageous to size the apertures in such a way that the total minimum flow area for all/the entire aperture(s) does not deviate much from the gross inflow area to the member, and to design the aperture(s) with flow area widening causing pressure recovery inside apertures. As a variation, shown in
A further possibility may be to create instead an accentuated minimum total flow area at the inlet to apertures. This may in particular be useful when a flow distributing member according to the invention is used at the chamber outflow/pipe inflow, to increase acoustical transmission resistance at the chamber/pipe transition.
In diffuser designs, a classical question is how to size the ratio between outlet and inlet cross-sectional areas. For a given type of diffuser, pressure recovery will gradually increase when this ratio is increased from a low value. Above a certain value of the ratio, flow separation will occur, i.e. the flow is no longer capable of adhering to all walls of the diffuser. In many cases, this is an unwanted situation. When diffusers are used in silencers, flow separation is normally to be avoided, since this phenomenon is associated with regenerated noise. Very big flow area ratios are bad in almost any situation, since major flow separation may destroy pressure recovery.
Yet, in diffuser literature, it is pointed out that a maximum pressure recovery will normally occur at a flow area ratio somewhat in excess of the maximum value at which flow separation is prevented. In flow distributing members according to the invention, this insight may be utilised to allow for a flow area ratio associated with some flow separation to be selected to ensure a great pressure recovery. The reason is that although increased regenerated noise will accompany pressure recovery, the centre frequency of this noise will be relatively high, since this frequency is linked to the transverse dimensions of the aperture, i.e. to a rather small wavelength. Such predominantly high-frequency, regenerated noise is rather easily attenuated elsewhere in the silencer, for instance in sound absorptive material. In particular, selecting a relatively big flow-area ratio in diffuser-shaped apertures according to the invention can be used at inlets to pipes leading exhaust gas from a silencer chamber, to increase the acoustical entrance resistance (the impedance).
It is foreseen that the invention will be applied both to silencers of complete new designs and to silencer types already used, for instance in currently marketed vehicles. In the latter case, internal silencer pipes with simple perforations (as shown in
In the present invention, the dimension s is at maximum 0.2 times the smallest cross-sectional dimension D of the inlet or outlet to which the flow distributing means is connected. The length L will be at least the same as the dimension s, whereby the apertures are formed so as to provide a flow-area widening in flow direction along at least part of the aperture length L and wherein substantial pressure recovery takes place with the apertures. In the invention, the geometrical surface extends in an axial direction and has a certain axial length. This axial length can be at least twice the smallest cross-sectional dimension D. The walls or profiles are adapted to be through flowed at one or more positions around at least 180 degrees of the periphery of the tube. The dimension s disclosed above can be at 0.1 or 0.5 or at least twice or at least four times the dimensions.
The minimum total flow cross-sectional area of said apertures is a factor f times the cross-sectional area of the inlet or outlet to which said flow distributing means is connected, said factor f being at the most 1.3 and at the least 0.7. The factor f can be between 0.9 and 1.1.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1999 01452 | Oct 1999 | DK | national |
2000 00588 | Apr 2000 | DK | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DK00/00576 | 10/11/2000 | WO | 00 | 7/11/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/27445 | 4/19/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
452020 | Prince, Jr. | May 1891 | A |
593970 | Schwarm | Nov 1897 | A |
1070600 | Haugen | Aug 1913 | A |
1532928 | O'Connor | Apr 1925 | A |
1685701 | Blanchard | Sep 1928 | A |
2122086 | Chase | Jun 1938 | A |
2512155 | Hill | Jun 1950 | A |
2544284 | Stephens et al. | Mar 1951 | A |
2706014 | Carroll | Apr 1955 | A |
2716463 | Latulippe | Aug 1955 | A |
2720935 | Lysholm et al. | Oct 1955 | A |
3335813 | Kelley | Aug 1967 | A |
3396535 | Milos | Aug 1968 | A |
3957133 | Johnson | May 1976 | A |
3999624 | Treftc et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4638838 | Richard et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4685533 | Piesik | Aug 1987 | A |
4685534 | Burstein et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5371331 | Wall | Dec 1994 | A |
5659158 | Browning et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5758497 | Frederiksen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6283246 | Nishikawa | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6341663 | Alex et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
308988 | Aug 1955 | CH |
807 035 | Dec 1936 | FR |
2 622 632 | May 1989 | FR |
481 172 | May 1936 | GB |
WO 9927237 | Jun 1999 | WO |