Patent Application
20120157568
The invention relates to a silica reinforced rubber composition comprised of low Tg polybutadiene, particularly high cis 1,4-polybutadiene or high trans 1,4-polybutadiene with or without functional groups, and high Tg styrene/butadiene elastomers, particularly functionalized styrene/butadiene, elastomers, together with high Tg liquid unsaturated conjugated diene-based polymer, particularly styrene/butadiene polymer, which can also be functionalized, and high glass transition or softening point temperature (Tm or Tg) resins, particularly high Tg styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin. The invention relates to a tire having a tread comprised of such rubber composition.
Historically it has been proposed to use various liquid polymers which contain carbon-to-carbon double bond unsaturation to replace at least a portion of rubber processing oil in various rubber compositions. The philosophy was for the unsaturated liquid polymer to help reduce the viscosity of the uncured elastomer and to later co-vulcanize with the elastomer upon curing the rubber composition. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 6,242,523.
Historically it has also been proposed to add various resin types to rubber compositions to improve traction. The philosophy was for the resin to provide a hysteretic response to the rubber composition to improve wet traction. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 6,242,523.
However, it is desired in this invention to evaluate combining both liquid polymers and resins in a high silica reinforced composition that contains a blend of specified styrene/butadiene and polybutadiene elastomers to provide a rubber composition for use as a tire tread which may possibly result in a significant improvement in both wet traction and treadwear (resistance to treadwear) performance for the tire tread. The ability to improve both of these two performance parameters for a tire tread application is extremely difficult. It is observed herein that the choice of liquid polymer, resin and elastomer types used with silica reinforcement is a critical step for this inventive process.
The term “phr” as used herein, and according to conventional practice, refers to “parts of a respective material per 100 parts by weight of rubber elastomer”. In the description of this invention, the terms “polymer”, “rubber” and “elastomer” can be used interchangeably, unless otherwise distinguished. The terms “rubber composition”, “compounded rubber” and “rubber compound” can be used interchangeably to refer to “rubber which has been blended or mixed with various ingredients and materials” and the terms “cure” and “vulcanize” may also be used interchangeably herein, unless otherwise noted and such terms are well known to those having skill in the rubber mixing or rubber compounding art. The term “Tg” relates to glass transition temperatures for the solid elastomer and liquid polymer. The resin may be referred to as being characterized by its glass transition temperature (Tg) or by its melting point temperature (Tm). The Tg and Tm can conveniently be determined by use of a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) at a heating rate of 10° C., a method well known to those having skill in such art.
This invention relates to novel rubber compositions which contain a combination of sulfur curable high molecular weight (molecular weight number average, or Mn, in terms of g/mol, greater than 100,000) styrene/butadiene (SBR) and 1,4-polybutadiene (BR) elastomers, high Tg unsaturated conjugated diene-based liquid polymers, particularly liquid styrene/butadiene polymers, having a low molecular weight (molecular weight number average, or Mn, in a range of from about 1,000 to 50,000 g/mol), and a resin having a defined glass transition temperature or melting point temperature (Tg or Tm), which is primarily reinforced with silica filler.
For this invention, such liquid polymers exclude liquid polybutadiene homopolymer, liquid block isoprene/butadiene copolymers, liquid polyalkylene block copolymers and liquid hydroxyl and epoxy functionalized polyalkylene polymers.
The term “liquid polymer” is intended to relate herein to polymers which are a pourable liquid or viscous fluid at room temperature (e.g. at 23° C.).
Resins include polyterprene based resins and styrene/alpha methyl styrene resins, preferably a styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin and are preferably exclusive of aliphatic hydrocarbon resins.
The invention further relates to such rubber composition being sulfur cured and used as a tire tread component of a tire.
In one embodiment of the invention, said silica reinforced rubber composition comprised of the SBR and BR elastomers is sulfur cured in the presence of sulfur, at least one sulfur vulcanization accelerator, fatty acid and zinc oxide contained in said rubber composition as a dispersion thereof in an amount of from zero to about 5 phr of zinc oxide, alternately in a range of from about zero to about 1 phr of zinc oxide, and alternately zero phr of said zinc oxide, namely to the exclusion of zinc oxide. Such fatty acid may be, for example stearic acid or combination of stearic, palmitic and oleic acids. Such exclusion of the zinc oxide (from sulfur curing such rubber composition) is considered herein as being a significant departure from past practice.
In accordance with this invention, a rubber composition is provided comprised of, based on parts by weight per 100 parts by weight elastomer (phr):
(A) High molecular weight solid conjugated diene-based elastomers (e.g. an Mn of greater than 100,000 g/mol) comprised of styrene/butadiene elastomer (SBR) and cis 1,4- or trans 1,4-polybutadiene elastomers (BR), particularly cis 1,4-polybutadiene elastomer, with a weight ratio of SBR to BR in a range of from about 70/30 to about 20/80, alternately about 60/40 to about 30/70;
wherein at least one of said SBR and BR elastomers can be in a form of a functionalized elastomer;
wherein said SBR has a Tg in a range of from about −40° C. to about 0° C., alternately from about −30° C. to about −10° C. and contains about 5 to about 50 percent bound styrene;
wherein said BR has a Tg in a range of from about −80° C. to about −110° C., alternately from about −90° C. to about −105° C.;
(B) about 2 to about 40 phr, alternately from about 5 to about 30 phr, liquid styrene/butadiene polymer (L-SBR) having a bound styrene content in a range of from about 5 to about 50 percent, a Tg in a range of from about −35° C. to about 0° C., alternately from about −30° C. to about −5° C., and a Mn molecular weight average in a range of from about 1,000 to about 50,000, alternately from about 2,000 to about 10,000 g/mol;
wherein said liquid L-SBR polymer can be in a form of a functionalized elastomer;
(C) about 40 to about 120 phr of particulate reinforcing filler comprised of:
(D) about 2 to about 30, alternately from about 5 to about 20, phr of resin having a glass transition temperature (Tg) or softening point temperature (Tm) in a range of from about 50° C. to about 150° C., alternately from about 60° C. to about 120° C.
In one embodiment, at least a portion of said SBR elastomer (the solid SBR) is a functionalized SBR (referred to herein as F-SBR) comprised of functionalized elastomer of solution co-polymerization prepared styrene and 1,3-butadiene monomers. In such embodiment, said F-SBR has at least one functional group interactive with said precipitated silica comprised of at least one of:
(A) amine group reactive with hydroxyl groups contained on a precipitated silica filler rubber reinforcement (referred to herein as an amine functionalized SBR), or
(B) siloxy group reactive with hydroxyl groups contained on a precipitated silica filler rubber reinforcement (for example, alkoxy silane group as —Si(OR)3), (which may be referred to herein as a siloxy functionalized SBR);
(C) combination of amine and siloxy functional groups with the siloxy group being reactive with hydroxyl groups contained on said precipitated silica;
(D) silane/thiol combination of groups (which may be referred to herein as a silane/thiol functionalized SBR);
(E) hydroxyl groups reactive with hydroxyl groups contained on said precipitated silica (which may be referred to herein as a hydroxyl functionalized SBR); and
(F) epoxy groups reactive with hydroxyl groups contained on said precipitated silica (which may be referred to herein as an epoxy functionalized SBR).
In another embodiment, at least a portion of said SBR liquid polymer (the L-SBR) is a functionalized L-SBR (referred to herein as LF-SBR). In such embodiment, said LF-SBR has at least one functional group interactive with said precipitated silica comprised of at least one of epoxy, amine, hydroxyl, carboxyl, maleic and malemide groups.
In another embodiment, said resin is a copolymer of styrene and alpha methylstyrene, namely a styrene/alpha methylstyrene, or alternately polyterpene, resin.
In further accordance with this invention such rubber composition is provided as being sulfur cured.
In further accordance with this invention, a tire is provided having a tread component comprised of said sulfur cured rubber composition.
In additional accordance with this invention such silica reinforced rubber composition of said SBR and BR elastomers is provided as being sulfur cured in the absence of zinc oxide and in the presence of fatty acid comprised of a combination of, or at least one of, stearic, palmitic and oleic acids.
In further accordance with this invention, said rubber composition may also contain natural or synthetic cis 1,4-polyisoprene rubber (e.g. about 5 to about 20 phr), if desired.
In further accordance with this invention, a tire is provided having a tread component comprised of said sulfur cured rubber composition.
A significant aspect of this invention is the creation of a specific rubber composition which can be used to enable an improvement of both wet traction and resistance to treadwear (treadwear resistance) when used in a tire tread which is considered a difficult target to achieve.
This is considered herein to be significant and a departure from past practice in a sense of being able to put together various individual material technologies that would not be expected in each of their own individual applications to promote achievement of a desired goal of providing a combination of wet traction and treadwear resistance performance improvement when used in a tire tread application. Accomplishment of such goal would be considered as being both novel and discovered result for tire use.
The rubber compositions of this invention can be prepared by simply mixing the rubber composition in a conventional internal rubber mixer such as, for example, a Banbury mixer. This can be done utilizing a wide variety of mixing techniques as would be known by one having skill in such art.
In one embodiment, the liquid polymer can be added to the elastomer in a separate masterbatch or mixing process. In such case, it may be advantageous to mix the liquid polymer into the elastomer before it is compounded, or blended, with other materials, or ingredients, to achieve a benefit of improved processability during the preparation of the non-productive and productive compounds. It should be noted that the non-productive compounds do not contain a curative, such as sulfur, or accelerators for the curative. On the other hand, productive compounds contain a curative which will cure (vulcanize) the rubber after it is heated to a curing temperature.
The rubber compositions of this invention will frequently contain a variety of additional compounding ingredients and/or additives. Typical amounts of processing aids and rubber compounding ingredients comprise about 1 to about 50 phr. Such processing aids can include, for example, aromatic, naphthenic, and/or paraffinic processing oils. Stearic acid is typically referred to as a “rubber compounding ingredient”. As purchased, it typically is comprised mainly of a combination of stearic acid, palmitic and oleic acids. Such mixture is conventionally referred to in the rubber compounding art as “stearic acid”. Typical amounts of antioxidants comprise about 1 to about 5 phr. Representative antioxidants may be, for example, diphenyl-p-phenylenediamine and others such as, for example, those disclosed in The Vanderbilt Rubber Handbook (1978), Pages 344 through 346. Typical amounts of antiozonants comprise about 0.5 to about 3 phr. Typical amounts of fatty acids, if used which can include stearic acid, comprise about 0.5 to about 5 phr. Typical amounts of peptizers comprise about 0.1 to about 1 phr. Typical peptizers may be, for example, pentachlorothiophenol and dibenzamidodiphenyl disulfide.
The vulcanization is conducted in the presence of a sulfur-vulcanizing agent. Examples of suitable sulfur-vulcanizing agents include elemental sulfur (free sulfur) or sulfur donating vulcanizing agents, for example, an amine disulfide, polymeric polysulfide or sulfur olefin adducts. Preferably, the sulfur vulcanizing agent is elemental sulfur. As known to those skilled in the art, sulfur-vulcanizing agents are used in an amount ranging from about 0.5 to about 4 phr, or even, in some circumstances, up to about 8 phr, with a range of from about 1.5 to about 3.5, sometimes from 2 to 2.5, being preferred.
Accelerators are used to control the time and/or temperature required for vulcanization and to improve the properties of the vulcanizate. In one embodiment, a single accelerator system may be used, i.e., primary accelerator. Conventionally and preferably, a primary accelerator(s) is used in total amounts ranging from about 0.5 to about 4, preferably about 0.8 to about 2.8, phr. In another embodiment, combinations of a primary and a secondary accelerator might be used with the secondary accelerator being used in smaller amounts (of about 0.05 to about 3 phr) in order to activate and to improve the properties of the vulcanizate. Combinations of these accelerators might be expected to produce a synergistic effect on the final properties and are somewhat better than those produced by use of either accelerator alone. In addition, delayed action accelerators may be used which are not affected by normal processing temperatures but produce a satisfactory cure at ordinary vulcanization temperatures. Vulcanization retarders might also be used. Suitable types of accelerators that may be used in the present invention are amines, disulfides, guanidines, thioureas, thiazoles, sulfenamides, dithiocarbamates and xanthates. The rubber composition of this invention can also contain waxes in conventional amounts.
The precipitated silica generally employed in this invention are precipitated silicas, for example, those obtained by the acidification of a soluble silicate, e.g., sodium silicate and prepared in the presence of an electrolyte. Such silicas may, for example, have a BET surface area, as measured using nitrogen gas, in a range of about 40 to about 600, and more usually in a range of about 50 to about 300, square meters per gram. The BET method of measuring surface area is described in the literature.
Various precipitated silicas may be, for example, and without an intended limitation, precipitated silicas from PPG Industries under the Hi-Sil trademark with designations 210, 243, etc.; from Rhodia such as, for example, Zeosil 1165 MP and from Degussa with, for example, designations VN2 and VN3.
The coupling agent for use with the precipitated silica may, for example, be comprised of a bis(3-trialkoxysilylalkyl) polysulfide which contains an average of from 2 to 4, alternately an average of from 2 to about 2.6 or an average of from about 3.4 to about 3.8, connecting sulfur atoms in its polysulfidic bridge. Representative of such coupling agent is for example, bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl) polysulfide.
Alternately, such coupling agent may be an organomercaptosilane (e.g. an alkoxyorganomercaptosilane), and particularly an alkoxyorganomercaptosilane having its mercapto function capped.
Such coupling agent may, for example, be added directly to the elastomer mixture or may be added as a composite of precipitated silica and such coupling agent formed by treating a precipitated silica therewith.
Accordingly, said coupling agent may, for example, be comprised of a bis(3-trialkoxysilylalkyl) polysulfide which contains an average of from 2 to 4 connecting sulfur atoms in its polysulfidic bridge, an organomercaptosilane or a composite of precipitated silica treated with said coupling agent.
The following Example is provided to further illustrate the invention where the parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
A series of rubber compositions were prepared to compare use of three individual resins, separately, for a primarily silica-reinforced rubber formulation comprised of a combination of styrene/butadiene elastomer and cis 1,4-polybutadiene elastomer.
The resins evaluated for use in the rubber compositions are styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin (Resin A), aliphatic hydrocarbon resin (Resin B) and polyterpene resin (Resin C).
The following Table 1 reflects a formulation used for the evaluation. The parts and percentages, where used, are expressed in terms of weight unless otherwise indicated.
1Styrene/butadiene copolymer rubber, amine functionalized and tin coupled, as SE SLR 4601 ™ from Dow containing about 21 percent bound styrene and having a vinyl content of about 50 percent
2Cis 1,4-polybutadiene rubber as BUD1207 ™ from The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
3Resin A = styrene/alpha methylstyrene as Resin 2336 ™ from Eastman Chemical Resin B = aliphatic hydrocarbon resin as Sartomer S-155 ™ from Sartomer Resin C = polyterpene resin as Sylvares TR 7125 ™ from Arizona Chemical
4Precipitated silica as Zeosil Z1165 MP ™ from Rhodia
5Silica coupler as Si266 ™ from Evonic comprised of bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl) polysulfide having an average sulfur content in its polysulfidic bridge in a range from about 2.1 to about 2.6
6Comprised of stearic, oleic and palmitic acids
7N550 rubber reinforcing carbon black, an ASTM designation
8Sulfenamide and diphenyl guanidine sulfur cure accelerators
The rubber compositions are referred to as rubber Samples A through F.
Rubber Samples A and D contained the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin (Resin A) in amounts of 10 and 15 phr, respectively. Rubber Samples B and E contained the aliphatic hydrocarbon resin (Resin B) in amounts of 10 and 15 phr, respectively. Rubber Samples C and F contained the polyterpene resin (Resin C) in amounts of 10 and 15 phr, respectively.
The Samples are prepared in a sequential stage mixing process in an internal rubber mixer, namely at least one non-productive mixing stage followed by a productive mixing stage.
The non-productive mixing stage(s) is conducted to a temperature of about 160 to about 165° C.
The sulfur curative and accelerator(s) are added in the productive mixing stage and mixed to a temperature of about 110° C. Ingredients have been reported in Table 1.
Various physical properties are reported in the following Table 2 in which the parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
The following Table 2 is provided for the above rubber Samples A through F to report various physical properties and extent of balance between wet traction, rolling resistance and resistance to wear properties in which the parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
1Rubber Process Analyzer (RPA)
2Grosch abrasion rate determination was run on an LAT-100 Abrader and measured in terms of mg/km of rubber abraded away. The test rubber sample is placed at a slip angle under constant load (Newtons) as it traverses a given distance on a rotating abrasive disk (disk from HB Schleifmittel GmbH). A high severity test was conducted at a load of 70 Newtons, a slip angle of 12 degrees and a disk speed of 20 km/hr and a sample travel distance of 250 meters.
Rubber Samples A, B and C with 10 phr of Each of Resins A, B and C
(1) Wet Traction: at the 10 phr resin level, all of the rubber Samples have the same predictive wet traction with a cold Rebound Value (0° C.) of about 15
(2) Wear Resistance: at the 10 phr resin level (Sample A), use of resin A resulted in the best wear resistance value of 501 mg/km (lower is better)
(3) Rolling Resistance: at the 10 phr resin level, resins A and C are seen to provide equivalent rolling resistance values whereas use of resin B is seen to provide a worse rolling resistance value.
Rubber Samples A, B and C with 15 phr of Each of Resins A, B and C
(1) Wet Traction: at the 15 phr resin level, all of the rubber Samples have similar predictive wet traction with a cold Rebound Value (0° C.) of 14-15
(2) Wear Resistance: at the 15 phr resin level, as was also observed for the 10 phr level, use of resin A (Sample D) resulted in the best wear resistance value of about 511 mg/km (lower is better)
(3) Rolling Resistance: at the 15 phr resin level, resin A (Sample D) provided the best rolling resistance value of 56 (higher is better)
Accordingly, it is concluded that when comparing use of Resins A, B and C at 10 and 15 phr levels, the best combination of the predicted wet traction, rolling resistance and wear resistance values was obtained with Resin A, namely the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin, although results from use of the polyterpene resin (C) somewhat closely approximated use of the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin in some circumstances and might be therefore suitable in appropriate circumstances.
With favorable results observed for use of Resin A observed in Example I, where the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin showed an optimum balance between predictive wet traction and wear resistance, with minimal loss of rolling resistance, Resin A was further evaluated in this Example in rubber compositions wherein a liquid unsaturated polymer, referred to in this Example as Liquid Polymer A, was used to replace a part of the rubber processing oil as indicated in the formulation shown in the following Table 3.
9Styrene/butadiene copolymer rubber, siloxyl functionalized and tin coupled, as SE SLR 4630 ™ from Dow having a Tg of about −23° C.
10Rubber processing oil as Naprex 38 from ExxonMobil Company
11Liquid solution polymerization prepared styrene/butadiene polymer containing carbon-to-carbon double bond unsaturation in its butadiene portion and having a Tg of about −15° C. as Ricon 100 from the Cray Valley company having a molecular weight (Mn) value of about 4500 g/mol.
The rubber compositions were vulcanized in a suitable mold by heating for about 14 minutes at a temperature of about 160° C.
Various physical properties of the vulcanized rubber compositions are shown in the following Table 4 as rubber Samples G through N.
Rubber Samples H, K and N contained the liquid polymer A
Rubber Samples K and N contained a combination of Resin A and Liquid Polymer A.
Table 4 contains two separate SBR/BR blend compositions. The first blend ratio of 70/30 was used in rubber Samples G through K, whereas the second blend ratio of 55/45 was used in rubber Samples L through N.
The results clearly show the best performance based on a combination of predictive wet traction and resistance to abrasion was observed for rubber Sample K in the SBR/BR blend ratio of 70/30 and for rubber Sample N for the SBR/BR 55/45 blend ratio.
Samples K and N contain the combination of Resin A and the Liquid Polymer A having a Tg of −15° C. and an Mn molecular weight value of 4500 g/mol.
The remainder of the rubber Samples which contained either the Resin A or the Liquid Polymer A alone did not exhibit as significant improvement of a combination of wet traction and abrasion resistance predictors.
The beneficial results of a combination of predictive wet traction and resistance to abrasion for rubber Samples K and N, using the combination of Resin A and Polymer A, were surprising and considered herein to not be predictive without considerable experimentation.
With favorable results observed in Example II for the use of the combination of Resin A, the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin, together with the Liquid Polymer as a liquid SBR polymer having a Tg of about −15° C. and an Mn molecular weight value of 4500 g/mol to achieve an improved balance between predictive wet traction and wear (abrasion) resistance, alternative liquid polymers A, B, C and D were evaluated for use with Resin A as indicated in the formulation reported in the following Table 5.
8Liquid polymers
Rubber Samples O through T were prepared.
Rubber Sample O, a 70/30 blend of SBR/BR, was a Control rubber Sample in a sense that it did not contain Resin A or any of the Liquid Polymers.
Rubber Sample P, a 55/45 blend of SBR/BR, was a Comparative rubber Sample in a sense that it contained Resin A without any of the Liquid Polymers and a different ratio of SBR and BR. Rubber samples Q-T also contained a 55/45 blend of SBR and BR.
Rubber Sample Q contained the Liquid Polymer A as well as Resin A.
Rubber Sample R contained the Liquid Polymer B as well as Resin A.
Rubber Sample S contained the Liquid Polymer C as well as Resin A.
Rubber Sample T contained the Liquid Polymer D as well as Resin A.
The rubber compositions (Samples) were vulcanized in a suitable mold by heating for about 14 minutes at a temperature of about 150° C.
Various physical properties of the vulcanized rubber compositions are shown in the following Table 6 for rubber Samples O through T, with rubber Sample O being the Control rubber Sample without any of Resin A or Liquid polymer.
In Table 6, focusing on a desire, or target, motivated by results obtained in Examples I and II, of a combination of improved wet traction and abrasion resistance as compared to Control O, it is clearly evident that Samples Q and T, which contain Resin A and liquid SBR polymers A and D, provide the best combination of wet traction and abrasion resistance. It is also surprising that the use of a higher level of BR, namely 30 to 45 phr, which helps to improve abrasion resistance and would normally cause a sharp loss of wet traction, did not impact the predictive wet traction, namely the cold Rebound value, when the Resin A and liquid polymers were added to the rubber compositions, wherein the liquid polymers were used to replace conventional processing oil.
In contrast, Samples R and S which also contain Resin A, but instead liquid PBD polymers B and C are inferior in wet traction and abrasion resistance when compared together versus Samples Q and T which contain Resin A and liquid SBR polymers A and D. These results suggest that the indicated liquid SBR polymers are favored for this inventive application to promote the combination of wet traction and resistance to wear promotion particularly when used in combination with Resin A, a copolymer of styrene and alpha methylstyrene.
The observed results also favor the higher molecular weight liquid SBR polymer as compared to liquid SBR polymer D for promoting resistance to abrasion.
With favorable results observed in Example III for the use of the combination of Resin A, the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin, together with the Liquid Polymer as a liquid SBR polymer having a Tg of −15° C. and an Mn molecular weight value of 4500 g/mol to achieve an improved balance between predictive wet traction and wear (abrasion) resistance, alternative resins B, C and D were evaluated for use with the Liquid Polymer as indicated in the formulation reported in the following Table 7.
7Resins
The rubber compositions were vulcanized in a suitable mold by heating for about 14 minutes at a temperature of about 150° C. Various physical properties of the vulcanized rubber compositions are shown in the following Table 8 for rubber Samples U through Z.
Rubber Samples U and V are Control rubber Samples without Resin A or Liquid polymer. Rubber Sample U contains a 70/30 blend of SBR and BR, whereas rubber Sample V contains a 50/50 blend of SBR and BR. Rubber Samples W through −Z also contain a 50/50 blend of SBR and BR.
A comparison of Samples U and V, which represents an increase of BR from 30 to 50 phr, gave a predicted improvement of abrasion resistance with a predicted loss of wet traction. Samples W through Z, which also contain the 50 phr level of BR, exhibit a predictive wet traction (cold rebound) better than the control sample U, which contains a 70/30 blend of SBR and BR, and also improved abrasion resistance prediction. Samples W and Y show the best combination of wet traction and abrasion resistance prediction, with sample W favoring better predictive rolling resistance than Sample Y. The discovery becomes obvious from these results that one can increase the level of BR, add a specified resin and replace oil with specified liquid polymers to achieve the unexpected improvement of both wet traction and abrasion resistance with minimum loss of rolling resistance when such compound are contemplated as being used in passenger tread applications.
With favorable results observed in Example II for the use of the combination of Resin A and the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin, together with the Liquid Polymer as a liquid SBR polymer having a Tg of −15° C. and an Mn molecular weight value of 4500 g/mol to achieve an improved balance between predictive wet traction and wear (abrasion) resistance, use of a functionalized SBR as an alternative to the SBR of the rubber composition was evaluated as indicated in the formulation reported in the following Table 9.
9Styrene/butadiene copolymer rubber, siloxyl functionalized and tin coupled, as SE SLR 4630 ™ from Dow having a Tg of about −23° C.
12Styrene/butadiene copolymer rubber, no siloxyl fictionalization, but tin coupled, as a modified version of SE SLR 4630 ™ from Dow having a Tg of about −23° C.
The rubber compositions were vulcanized in a suitable mold by heating for about 14 minutes at a temperature of about 150° C.
Various physical properties of the vulcanized rubber compositions are shown in the following Table 10 for rubber Samples AA, BB and CC.
Rubber Samples AA and BB contained a functionalized SBR (F-SBR) whereas rubber Sample CC contained a non-functionalized SBR(NF-SBR). Rubber Sample AA was a Control rubber Sample which did not contain a combination of Resin and Liquid Polymer. Rubber Samples BB and CC were Experimental rubber Samples.
It can be seen from Table 10 that the functionalized and non-functionalized SBR gave similar predictive wet traction (cold rebound values) and abrasion resistance values, however the functionalized SBR (Sample BB) gave a better predictive rolling resistance based on hot rebound and tan delta values.
This is considered as being significant in a sense of obtaining the best overall performance for wet traction and abrasion resistance combined with rolling resistance for a tire with a tread of such rubber composition.
With favorable results observed in Example II for the use of the combination of Resin A and the styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin, together with the Liquid Polymer as a liquid SBR polymer having a Tg of −15° C. and an Mn molecular weight value of 4500 g/mol to achieve an improved balance between predictive wet traction and wear (abrasion) resistance, an evaluation of use, or non use, of zinc oxide was undertaken and evaluated as indicated in the formulation reported in the following Table 11.
12Silica coupling agent as the liquid version of Si-69 without its carbon black carrier from Degussa comprised of bis(3-triethoxysilylpropyl) polysulfide containing an average of from about 3.5 to about 3.8 connecting sulfur atoms in its polysulfidic bridge reported in the Table in terms of the coupling agent instead of the composite.
The rubber compositions were vulcanized in a suitable mold by heating for about 14 minutes at a temperature of about 150° C.
Various physical properties of the vulcanized rubber compositions are shown in the following Table 12 for rubber Samples DD, EE and FF.
Sample DD is a silica reinforced Control rubber Sample with elastomers comprised of 70 phr functionalized SBR (F-SBR) and 30 phr cis 1,4-polybutadiene together with 3.5 phr of zinc oxide and without Resin A and liquid SBR polymer.
Experimental rubber Sample FF is a silica reinforced Experimental rubber comprised of 50 phr functionalized SBR (F-SBR) and 50 phr cis 1,4-polybutadiene together with a combination of 10 phr of styrene/alpha methylstyrene resin and 9 phr of liquid SBR polymer and 3.5 phr of zinc oxide.
Experimental rubber Sample FF is the same as Experimental rubber Sample EE except that it does not contain zinc oxide.
Surprisingly, it can readily be seen from Table 11 that a significant and discovered improvement is evident for abrasion resistance of sample FF, with the sulfur vulcanized silica reinforced rubber composition of the F-SBR and BR elastomers with sulfur and sulfur vulcanization accelerators together with the fatty acid comprised of a combination of stearic, palmitic and oleic acids exclusive of the presence of the zinc oxide, as compared to sample EE which contained a more conventional presence of 3.5 phr of zinc oxide.
Indeed, the Grosch abrasion value is observed to be reduced from 503 mg/km for rubber Sample EE to a value of only 383 mg/km for Experimental rubber Sample FF which represents a beneficial 23 percent reduction in abrasion resistance value.
The mechanism of such surprising result of increase in abrasion resistance effect is not fully understood and is considered herein as being a significant discovery.
While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for the purpose of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of and incorporates by reference U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/425,330, filed Dec. 21, 2010.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61425330 | Dec 2010 | US |
