The invention relates to a stable silicon dioxide dispersion of high filler content which comprises a polyol, and to the preparation and use thereof.
It is known to employ silicon dioxide dispersions of high filler content for thermal insulations, in particular for insulating glasses.
DE-A-19943103 describes a dispersion having a content of amorphous silicon dioxide of more than 80 wt. %. In this context, amorphous is to be understood as meaning a silicon dioxide of very low surface area, preferably having a BET surface area of 0.001 to 0.5 m2/g. Although it is described as being very readily pourable, the dispersion claimed nevertheless retains this property for only a short time, of not more than 2 hours. This means that such a dispersion must be processed immediately after its preparation, that is to say can be neither stored nor transported.
DE-A-19720269 describes a dispersion having a content of nanoscale particles, for example silicon dioxide, of at least 35 wt. %. This dispersion furthermore comprises 1 to 40% of water or an organic solvent, and furthermore 10 to 60 wt. % of a compound having at least two functional groups, preferably a polyol. This dispersion also has only a very low stability and must be processed rapidly. It has been found that even with higher-energy dispersing conditions, nothing changes in this behaviour.
The object of the invention is to provide a dispersion of high filler content which comprises silicon dioxide, is stable over a relatively long period of time and has a low viscosity. In particular, it should show advantages over dispersions according to the prior art in the production of insulating glasses.
The invention provides a stable, pourable silicon dioxide dispersion in which
In the context of the invention, stable is to be understood here as meaning that the silicon dioxide dispersion shows no noticeable sedimentation within a period of time of at least one month, as a rule at least 3 months. That is to say, the dispersion can be employed during the period of time without further filtration steps. Furthermore, no or only a minimal increase in the viscosity is to be observed within this period of time. This means that within this period of time the silicon dioxide dispersion retains its property of being pourable at room temperature.
The silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention can comprise additives in the form of biocides or dispersing auxiliaries. For many uses, however, these additives may prove to be a disadvantage, so that it may be advantageous if the dispersion according to the invention comprises no such additives.
The origin of the silicon dioxide powder employed is not decisive. Thus, for example, silicon dioxide powder prepared by precipitation or by pyrogenic processes can be present in the dispersion. However, it has been found that pyrogenically prepared metal oxide powders can advantageously be employed.
Pyrogenically prepared metal oxide powders are generally understood as meaning those which are obtained from a metal oxide precursor by a flame hydrolysis or flame oxidation in an oxyhydrogen flame. In this process, approximately spherical primary particles are initially formed, these sintering together to aggregates during the reaction. The aggregates can then accumulate into agglomerates. In contrast to the agglomerates, which as a rule can be separated into the aggregates relatively easily by introduction of energy, the aggregates are broken down further, if at all, only by intensive introduction of energy.
Silicon dioxide is as a rule prepared by flame hydrolysis of silicon tetrachloride. In the case of pyrogenic processes, silicon-metal mixed oxides or silicon dioxides doped with metal oxide can also be obtained by joint flame hydrolysis or flame oxidation. In addition to pyrogenically prepared silicon dioxide powder, the silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention can advantageously also comprise potassium-doped silicon dioxide powder, the preparation of which is described, for example, in DE-A-10065028.
The pyrogenically prepared silicon dioxide powder has a specific surface area of preferably 5 to 500 m2/g, and particularly preferably 30 to 60 m2/g.
The choice of polyol is not limited, as long as it remains miscible with water. Suitable polyols can be glycerol, ethylene glycol, trimethylolpropane, pentaerythritol, sorbitol, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol or a mixture thereof. Glycerol is particularly preferred in this context.
The choice of the substance having an alkaline action likewise is not limited, as long as it is soluble in the liquid phase of water and polyol. It has been found that alkali metal hydroxides, amines, (alkyl)ammonium hydroxides and/or amino alcohols are preferred. Potassium hydroxide is particularly preferred.
A silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention which is particularly preferred can be one which comprises
Any impurities of the starting substances and substances formed during the preparation of the dispersion are included in this. In particular, dispersions of pyrogenically prepared silicon dioxide powder have an acidic pH as a result of the preparation, due to adhering residues of hydrochloric acid. These hydrochloric acid residues are neutralized to potassium chloride by the KOH present in the dispersion.
The invention also provides a process for the preparation of the silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention, in which
The silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention can furthermore be obtained by a process in which
In both processes it is advantageous to employ an aqueous solution having the highest possible concentration as the substance having an alkaline action, in order not to dilute the dispersion too much. Substances having an alkaline action with a concentration of 20 to 50 wt. % can preferably be employed, potassium hydroxide solution being particularly preferred.
The processes can also be carried out by a procedure in which the addition of the polyol takes place only after the dispersing of the silicon dioxide powder and before the addition of the substance having an alkaline action.
The dispersion according to the invention can furthermore be obtained by a procedure in which at least two part streams of the dispersion prepared as described above with a rotor/stator or planetary kneader are placed under a pressure of up to 3,500 kg/cm2 and let down via a nozzle and the part streams are allowed to collide with one another.
The invention also provides the use of the silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention as a component of a flame-retardant filling of hollow spaces between structural components, in particular between insulating glass arrangements.
In addition, the silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention can also be used as a component of a filling of hollow spaces between structural components of plastic, metal, wood, plaster board, fermacel, pressboard, ceramic and natural or artificial stone, as well as in electric cables, for fireproofing purposes.
It can also be employed as a coating composition for structural components, and is suitable for the production of thermally and mechanically stable foams in the form of, for example, bulk goods or mouldings.
The dispersion according to the invention can also be used in a mixture with pigments or (organic or inorganic, for example fibrous, pulverulent or lamellar) coarser, non-nanoscale additives, such as, for example, mica pigments, iron oxides, wood flour, glass fibres, metal fibres, carbon fibres, sands, clays and bentonite, if the transparency of the material which can thereby be produced is not important.
42.5 kg of completely demineralized water and 2.25 kg glycerol are initially introduced into a high-grade steel mixing container. 60 kg AEROSIL® OX50 are then sucked in under shearing conditions with the aid of the suction pipe of a rotor/stator machine (Ystral Conti-TDS 3, stator slits: 4 mm ring and 1 mm ring, rotor/stator distance approx. 1 mm, speed of rotation 3,000 rpm). The pH is lowered to 3.7 during this procedure. Thereafter, 9 kg water, 3.75 kg glycerol and, under the same dispersing conditions, swiftly 2.02 kg 30 percent strength by weight potassium hydroxide solution are added in succession.
Examples 2 to 9 are carried out analogously, and in Example 10 no potassium hydroxide solution is added. The amounts employed for the preparation of the dispersions can be seen from Table 1.
The composition of the dispersions and the physico-chemical values thereof are reproduced in Table 2. Example 3a shows the values of a dispersion from Example 3 subsequently ground under 2,500 bar with a high-energy mill.
Examples 1 to 8 are dispersions according to the invention, Examples 9 and 10 are comparison examples.
In Example 11, the silicon dioxide dispersion is first dispersed at a higher silicon dioxide concentration and diluted to the desired concentration before the addition of potassium hydroxide solution.
36.1 kg of completely demineralized water and 9.0 kg glycerol are initially introduced into a high-grade steel mixing container. 60 kg AEROSIL® OX50 are then sucked in under shearing conditions with the aid of the suction pipe of a rotor/stator machine (Ystral Conti-TDS 3, stator slits: 4 mm ring and 1 mm ring, rotor/stator distance approx. 1 mm, speed of rotation 3,000 rpm) and sheared for 15 minutes. The SiO2 concentration is 57 wt. %. The pH is lowered to 3.5 during this procedure by the “acidic” AEROSIL®. Thereafter, 15.2 kg glycerol are added and, after some minutes of homogenization, a pH of 10.9 is swiftly established with 2.2 kg 30 percent strength by weight potassium hydroxide solution under the same dispersing conditions. Finally, a further 1.0 kg water is added in order to establish an SiO2 concentration of 48.6 and a glycerol concentration of 19.6. The pH is changed only insignificantly by this small amount of water.
The dispersions according to the invention of Examples 1 to 8 and 11 all have a very low viscosity. The average aggregate diameter (number-related) of the silicon dioxide particles in the dispersion is less than 150 nm.
The dispersion from Example 11, which is obtained by dispersing at a high silicon dioxide content and subsequent dilution to the desired concentration, shows advantages over the process in which the dispersing is carried out directly with the desired concentration. The grinding is more intense and the viscosity of the dispersion is lower.
The dispersion according to the invention from Example 3a, prepared by high-energy grinding, shows a further reduction in the viscosity and particle size.
Example 7a gives the values of dispersion 7 after storage in a climatically controlled chamber for three months. In this, the temperatures are varied daily between 10° C. and 50° C. Even after three months, the silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention still shows excellent viscosity values.
Dispersion 8, with a pH of 11.8, shows a very low viscosity. A further increase in the pH indeed lowers the viscosity further, but initial dissolving of the silicon dioxide particles is already to be observed. Potash silicates are increasingly formed, depending on the temperature and time, due to the initial dissolving of the silicon dioxide. As the reaction progresses, a potash water-glass with an increasing SiO2/K2O ratio is increasingly formed from the dilute low-viscosity potassium hydroxide solution as a homogeneous phase. Since potassium hydroxide solution is consumed in this reaction, KOH would have to be added again to maintain a high pH, but as a result of this the potash water-glass reaction is also accelerated again. However, potash water-glasses show a marked increase in viscosity as the SiO2/K2O ratio and concentration increase. In order to suppress such time- and temperature-dependent reactions, a pH of below 12 is essential.
At alkaline pH values of less than 10, a significant increase in the viscosity is likewise to be observed (Example 9). A dispersion without the addition of KOH shows a significantly higher viscosity and gels within days (Example 10).
It is surprising that the polyol-containing silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention has low viscosities only at a pH of more than 10. It is known that in purely aqueous dispersions which comprise no polyol, the lowering in viscosity already starts from a pH of approx. 9.
In the preparation of the silicon dioxide dispersion according to the invention, it is essential that the silicon dioxide powder is first dispersed in the acidic range at a pH of 5 or less and the substance having an alkaline action is added rapidly under the same dispersing conditions. If the substance having an alkaline action is added slowly, rapid gel formation takes place.
(a)Aerosil ® OX50;
(b)30 wt. % strength KOH in water;
(e)comparison example;
(c)grinding with a high-energy mill;
(d)after storage for three months;
(e)comparison example;
(f)viscosity at 23° C.;
(g)shear rate;
(h)aggregate diameter (median)
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 031 785 | Jul 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/006481 | 6/16/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/29/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/002773 | 1/12/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2984629 | Loftman et al. | May 1961 | A |
3004921 | Stossel | Oct 1961 | A |
3046234 | Roman et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3655578 | Yates et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
6641870 | Bartkowiak et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663683 | Lortz et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676719 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6767377 | Schumacher et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773697 | Hemme et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773814 | Schumacher et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808769 | Batz-Sohn et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6905632 | Lortz et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6991190 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015270 | Scharfe et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7083769 | Moerters et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7244302 | Schumacher et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255735 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7399487 | Batz-Sohn et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7470423 | Lortz et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7538142 | Lortz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7572854 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7615577 | Lortz et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7645335 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7749322 | Schumacher et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780777 | Perlet et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7781520 | Standke et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815936 | Hasenzahl et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834073 | Standke et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7976719 | Batz-Sohn et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8012367 | Hasenzahl et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8039110 | Jenkner et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20010042493 | Scharfe et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020134027 | Lortz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020197311 | Hasenzahl et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108580 | Hasenzahl et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030228271 | Batz-Sohn et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040106697 | Lortz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040240062 | Lortz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050169861 | Lortz et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050265934 | Schumacher et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060093542 | Schumacher et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104881 | Lortz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060159635 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159636 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159637 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163533 | Batz-Sohn et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229210 | Neugebauer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060292192 | Hasenzahl et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070110906 | Edelmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070231280 | Schumacher et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297998 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058489 | Edelmann et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080095724 | Hasenzahl et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080187673 | Standke et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206572 | Edelmann et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080213325 | Schumacher et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221318 | Edelmann et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249237 | Hager et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264299 | Lortz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090005518 | Just et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090007818 | Militz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022898 | Standke et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030162 | Mueh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047225 | Hasenzahl et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069464 | Standke | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090131694 | Schumacher et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090186053 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100117021 | Batz-Sohn et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119851 | Giessler-Blank et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100159144 | Standke et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191001 | Wassmer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100209339 | Schumacher et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209719 | Borup et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100233392 | Batz-Sohn et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100308287 | Lortz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110143147 | Edelmann et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144226 | Spyrou et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110259240 | Jenkner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110268899 | Albert et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
197 20 269 | Nov 1998 | DE |
2004 035473 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004020334 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/257,488, filed Oct. 21, 2011, Standke et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/256,557, filed Sep. 14, 2011, Scharfe et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090261309 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |