Silicon micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) resonators can have frequency reference applications, commonly using capacitive detection and actuation principles. For example, small electrodes positioned between the resonator and the support structure can capacitively detect relative gap changes as the resonator resonates. The resonance frequency can then be derived.
There are several disadvantages, however, to such configurations. One disadvantage is that the input and output impedances are high. Additionally, parasitic capacitances have an increasing influence as structure sizes decrease.
Embodiments of the invention are related to MEMS devices and methods. In one embodiment, a MEMS device includes a resonator element comprising a magnetic portion having a fixed magnetization, and at least one sensor element comprising a magnetoresistive portion, wherein a magnetization and a resistivity of the magnetoresistive portion vary according to a proximity of the magnetic portion.
In another embodiment, a silicon MEMS device includes a support structure defining a cavity, a resonator element disposed in the cavity and comprising a magnetic portion having a fixed magnetization, at least one magnetoresistive portion disposed in the support structure and having a magnetization configured to vary according to a proximity of the magnetic portion, and circuitry coupled to the at least one magnetoresistive portion and adapted to sense a resistance of the magnetoresistive portion.
In yet another embodiment, a method includes measuring a resistance of a magnetoresistive portion of a resonator device, and determining a resonant frequency of a resonator element of the resonator device from the resistance.
The invention may be more completely understood from the following detailed description of various embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Embodiments of the invention relate to micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) technology, such as silicon resonator devices which comprise xMR sensor structures. Various embodiments of the invention can be more readily understood by reference to
In
Resonator device 100 further comprises a resonating element 108 coupled to a top sealing portion 110 by an anchor 112. Resonating element 108 is separated from electrode 106 by a cavity 114. Resonating element 108 moves or resonates in the x-y plane, generating a reference frequency. Resonators can be designed such that they resonate in other or additional planes, as in other embodiments.
Resonating element 108 and electrode 106 are separated by a distance d. Resonating element 108 and electrode 106 can thus be approximated as a parallel plate capacitor having a capacitance (C).
In the above equation, ∈ is the dielectric constant, A is the electrode area, d is the gap distance between the two plates, and x is the movement in operation.
In operation, a combination of an AC voltage and a DC voltage can be applied to the electrode:
U=udc+uac sin(ωt)
This voltage forces the resonator to move. The resonator itself can be described as an actuated spring-mass-damper system, e.g. a harmonic, damped, forced oscillator:
where F is the actuating force, m is the mass of the resonator, c is the damping coefficient, k is the stiffness of the resonator, and x is its deflection. The force is now an electrostatic force and can be written as follows:
If the frequency of the actuating AC voltage is now the same as the natural frequency of the resonator, the resonator will begin to move. This movement causes a current to flow through the electrode-resonator system, which can then be provided as an input for an amplifier.
From the above, resonator devices can be electrically modelled with a Butterworth-van-Dyke model, as depicted in
The resonant frequency fs is therefore not dependant on the area of electrodes 106 and resonating element 108.
In series resonance, the total impedance of the system is related to the motional resistance (Rm) of resonating element 108. It can be described by:
where Q is the quality factor of the resonator and η is the so-called electromechanical coupling, which is related to an applied DC-bias voltage (udc), the distance between electrode 106 and resonating element 108 (d) as well as the static capacitance in between (C0).
Knowing that the static capacitance C0 is the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor and that there is no dielectric in the gap, the electromechanical coupling can be expressed as:
The motional resistance which governs the impedance in series resonance then becomes:
In the case of series resonance, the motional inductance and the motional capacitance cancel each other out, and the impedance seen at the input and output of the resonator is related to the motional resistance. In order to have a stable resonating system, an amplifier connected to the resonator should compensate for this motional resistance, i.e., the amplifier should have a negative resistance equal to the motional resistance in operation and higher for start-up.
Referring to
According to various embodiments of the invention, the resonator will further comprise a magnetic material in or on the resonating element to provide a defined stray magnetic field. Magnetoresistive effect, or xMR, sensors can then be positioned in or on the resonator support structure in close distance to the magnetic field. Relative movements of the resonator element can then produce a change in the magnetic field, and thus also lead to changes that can be sensed by the xMR sensors. A rotation of a sense layer of the xMR sensor will lead to a change of the magnetoresistance, which can be detected and quantified such that a resonant frequency of the resonator element can be determined.
Referring to
In one embodiment, a magnetic dipole element 206 is formed on resonator element 204. In the embodiment of
Resonator device 200 further comprises sensor elements 208 formed in or on support structure 202. In the embodiment of
In one embodiment, sensor elements 208 comprise magnetoresistive effect elements or portions, referred to as xMR elements 210, in a sense layer 212. xMR elements 210 include tunneling magnetoresistive (TMR), giant magnetoresistive (GMR), anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR), and others. In one embodiment, magnetic dipole element 206 and sensor elements 208 are formed of the same material or materials, such as a spinvalve TMR stack, for example.
Magnetic dipole element 206 and sensor elements 208 provide resonance detection based on resistance, as opposed to capacitance as in other MEMS resonator structures. The magnetization of magnetic dipole element 206 is fixed according to magnetostatic laws due to the large aspect ratio between the width and the length of magnetic dipole element 206 on resonator element 204, while the magnetization of sensor elements 208, in particular xMR elements 210, is easily altered by the stray field of magnetic dipole element 206 and varies because of and with the resonance of resonator element 204. The change, or rotation, of the magnetization of xMR element 210 in sense layer 212 of sensor elements 208 results in a change of the magnetoresistance, Rf, of sensor elements 208, which can be detected. As shown in
The resistance of the left-side (again, relative to the orientation depicted in
Referring to
At position (A), resonator element 204 is at a neutral center position, spaced apart from each sensor element 208 by a distance d0. In one embodiment, d0 is less than about one micron. The resulting resistance of xMR sensor element 208 is therefore at neither a high nor a low position, as shown on the curve at the right.
At position (B), resonator element 204 has moved away from sensor element 208 by Δd, for a total separation distance of d0+Δd. In this position, the magnetization of xMR portion 210 is the same as the reference, or pre-aligned, magnetization, because the effects of magnetic dipole element 206 are minimized, i.e., the strength of the magnetic field of magnetic dipole element 206 at sensor element 208 is low. The resistance is therefore relatively low.
At position (C), resonator element 204 has moved closer to sensor element 208, resulting in a separation distance of d0−Δd. In this position, the magnetization of xMR portion 210 opposes the reference magnetization because of the effects of now-closer magnetic dipole element 206, i.e., the strength of the magnetic field of magnetic dipole element 206 at sensor element 208 is high. The resistance is therefore relatively high.
As previously mentioned, only the right-side sensor element 208 is depicted in
Thus, various embodiments of the resonator devices 200 and 300 depicted and described herein, provide stable and sensitive determination of resonant frequency through detection of changes in the resistance of xMR sensor elements. Embodiments of the invention therefore reduce or eliminate the aforementioned problems associated with other MEMS resonators.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein for purposes of description of an example embodiment, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a wide variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations calculated to achieve the same purposes may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the invention may be implemented in a very wide variety of embodiments. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the various embodiments discussed herein, including the disclosure information in the attached appendices. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3814863 | O'Day et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4851762 | Kim et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5106826 | Alford et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5525901 | Clymer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
6883384 | Takada et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6940370 | Bircumshaw et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7847542 | Bartos et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020178831 | Takada | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030030527 | Mhani | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060158268 | McCorquodale et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070125161 | Bryzek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152537 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176519 | Shiaa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006106456 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100045274 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |