1) Fluorinated compound (Pf):
Polyfluoroacrylate sold by DuPont de Nemours under the commercial reference FORAPERLE® F225. This polyfluoroacrylate is presented in the form of a solution in a solvent (n-butyl acetate) comprising approximately 30% on a dry basis of polyacrylate.
2) Crosslinkable liquid silicone formulation according to the invention (F1):
It has the following composition (the parts are given by weight):
A: mixture of:
B: mixture of:
D: white spirit: 30 parts.
It is rediluted in the white spirit before application, at the rate of a concentration of 15% by weight of A+B.
3) Crosslinkable liquid silicone formulation according to the invention (F2):
Mixture of 80 parts of F1 and of 20 parts of a hydroxylated gum C having of the order of 0.01% of OH by weight and composed to 100% by weight of (CH3)2SiO2/2 units, having a viscosity of 4 000 000 mPa·s.
The mixture is rediluted in the white spirit before application, at the rate of a concentration of 15% by weight of A+B+C.
3) Test of the oleophobicity
The treated textile used is a woven textile made of polyamide-6,6 and elasthane (80/20). It is composed of elastic yarns in warp and weft based on an elasthane, 44 dtex, covered with some PA-6,6, 44 dtex/34 strands. These textile surfaces exhibit a high bidirectional elasticity (100% elongation in both directions) and a unit weight of 130 g/m2.
The textile is treated by padding with the solutions. It is subjected to drying at ambient temperature for a few minutes and is then heat treated at 180° C. for 2 minutes.
The beading effect is measured by the Spray Test AATCC Test Method 22-1996. The test consists in spraying the sample of the textile article with a given volume of water. The appearance of the sample is subsequently evaluated visually and compared with the standards. A grade from 0 to 5 is assigned according to the amount of water retained. For 0, the sample is completely wet, for 5, the sample is completely dry.
The oleophobic nature is measured by the standardized test (AATCC Test Method 118-1997) known under the name of “Oil repellency: Hydrocarbon Resistance Test”. The “oil resistance test” consists in depositing drops of liquids with decreasing interfacial tensions on the textile and in determining the liquid LH starting from which spreading of the drops is observed. A grade of 0 to 8 is assigned depending on the LH obtained, 0 when liquid petrolatum spreads out (liquid paraffin, slight oleophobic nature), 3 when n-tetradecane spreads out (marked oleophobicity) and 8 when n-heptane no longer spreads out (very marked oleophobicity).
To test the longevity of the treatment, the samples are washed for 30 minutes in a continuous washing cycle at 50° C. in a commercial washing machine (Miele trade mark, Novotronic 824 model) in the presence of a standardized detergent (ECE Non-Phosphate Reference Detergent A—the formulation of which is given in BS1006: 1900: UK-T0) which corresponds to strong washing conditions. The amount of detergent used is 96 g (as the volume of water used by the machine is 12 l, this amount corresponds to a conventional concentration of 8 g/l). At the end of the cycle, 3 successive rinsing operations are carried out, followed by spin drying at 500 rev/min for 2 minutes. The textiles are subsequently dried in an oven at 150° C. for 1 min.
4) Experimental results:
The results show:
the poor longevity of the treatments carried out using the polyfluoroacrylate (Pf) alone;
the improvement in the oleophobic properties of the mixtures of silicone composition F1 or F2 and polyfluoroacrylate Pf;
the addition of the silicone composition makes it possible to reduce by a factor of 5 the amount of polyfluoroacrylate necessary in order to obtain the maximum grade in the oil resistance test, which constitutes a saving in cost insofar as polyfluoroacrylates are expensive;
the improvement in the longevity of the oil-repellent and water-repellent treatment with the mixtures combining silicone composition F1 or F2 and polyfluoroacrylate Pf.
It should be clearly understood that the invention defined by the appended claims is not limited to the specific embodiments indicated in the above description but encompasses the alternative forms thereof which depart neither from the scope nor from the spirit of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0403386 | Mar 2004 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR05/00767 | 3/30/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2007 |