CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims priority to and the benefit of Taiwan Application Series Number 104102059 filed on Jan. 22, 2015, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
The present disclosure relates generally to single-inductor multiple-output (SIMO) based DC-DC converters, more especially to SIMO based converters with adaptive gate biasing (AGB) technique for thermoelectric energy harvesting.
Energy harvested from the environment can be used to develop battery-free electronics systems or prolong battery life. Among the different green energy sources from ambient environment such as light, motion, and heat, thermal power from human body is an efficient and reliable energy source for wearable applications. However, the output voltage of thermoelectric generators (TEGs) is typically less than 100 mV for a thermal difference of 2K depending on the temperature dependent output characteristics range of 10 mV/K to 50 mV/K. Moreover, considering the limited power budget of TEGs, the load system typically requires digital circuits operating in the near-threshold region to reduce power dissipation. Therefore, a power converter that can convert the harvested energy to a near-threshold output is required to realize an energy efficient system. However, designing a high efficiency low-VIN low-VOUT converter is challenging owing to the significant conduction losses (PCONDUCTION) in power transistors.
Numerous thermoelectric energy harvesting power converters have been proposed in the art for low VIN and low power operation. However, the output stages of these power converters are greater than 0.9V. A two-stage topology with a cascaded auxiliary boost converter and a DC-DC buck converter has been proposed, as shown in FIG. 1. An auxiliary boost converter with an additional off-chip inductor LAUX acts as a buffer, and the DC-DC buck converter maintains the VOUT value at 1.8V. With this two-stage topology, the low VIN and low VOUT specifications can be realized because VOUT can be regulated to any desired level. However, this structure in FIG. 1 has low efficiency because of the two-stage conversion and high conversion ratio in the auxiliary boost converter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings. In the drawings, like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various figures unless otherwise specified. These drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. Likewise, the relative sizes of elements illustrated by the drawings may differ from the relative sizes depicted.
The invention can be more fully understood by the subsequent detailed description and examples with references made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 shows a thermoelectric energy harvesting power converter in the art;
FIG. 2 shows a single-stage power converter according to embodiments of the invention;
FIG. 3 shows a conceptual block diagram of the AGB technique;
FIG. 4A shows the circuit schematic of the primary boost converter 20 in FIG. 3;
FIG. 4B demonstrates the conversion efficiencies of converters with AGE, technique and without AGB technique respectively;
FIG. 5 shows the primary boost converter and the biasing voltage generator 14 in FIG. 3;
FIG. 6 demonstrates the PWM generator in FIG. 3, including a latch comparator and a 7-bit DPWM (digital PWM) generator;
FIG. 7 details the POUT detector and the level-shift module in FIG. 3;
FIGS. 8A and 8B demonstrates the latch comparators PD1 and PD2, respectively;
FIG. 9 shows four different operation statuses PathA, PathB, PathC, and PathD for the SIMO of FIG. 5;
FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C and 10D show the inductor current waveforms when the SIMO of FIG. 5 operates at the four statuses, respectively; and
FIG. 11 shows the energy delivery mechanism of near-VTH ERC and skipping modulation in response to skip signals SKIP1 and SKIP2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
An embodiment of the invention introduces a 100 mV VIN, 500 mV VOUT high-efficiency SIMO-based boost converter for harvesting thermoelectric energy generated by thermoelectric generators. FIG. 2 shows a single-stage power converter according to embodiments of the invention, which employs adaptive gate biasing (AGB) technique and near-threshold voltage (near-VTH) energy redistribution control (ERC). To improve the conversion efficiency at low VOUT, two key techniques are used. (1) An AGB technique that provides dual load-dependent voltages (gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2) for driving the power transistors of the primary boost converter. This technique improves the conversion efficiency by reducing PCONDUCTION and switching loss (PSWITCHING) at different load conditions and providing a self-calibration mechanism against VTH variation. (2) A near-VTH ERC mechanism that is powered by VOUT and manages the power delivery strategy of output voltage VOUT, VAGB1, and VAGB2. One embodiment of the invention achieves a maximum efficiency of 83.4% at an output power (POUT) of 250 uW, and power efficiency greater than 80% over the output power range of 150 uW to 450 uW. In addition, the core controller is implemented using 7-bit delay-line based digital pulse width modulation (DPWM), which not only reduces the quiescent power to 0.48 uW but also ensures reliable digital operation with the near-VTH power supply form output voltage VOUT.
FIG. 3 shows a conceptual block diagram of the AGB technique. PWM generator 18 in the AGB circuit 10 provides digital PWM signal CKPWM based on a clock signal CK, output voltage VOUT and reference voltage VREF. The POUT detector 12, powered by output voltage VOUT, senses the voltage difference between VX and VSS when MN1 is ON, and the voltage difference between VX and VOUT when MN2 is ON. As indicated in FIG. 3, VSS is the voltage at a ground line and VX is at the joint node between MN2 and MN1. Outputs VGP1 and VGP2 of the POUT detector 12 control the biasing voltage generator 14 to generate gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 which perform as power sources for level-shift and driver module 16. Based on the PWM signal CKPWM and outputs of the POUT detector 12, level-shifter and driver module 16 provides gate control signals VGN1 and VGN2, whose signal levels are determined by gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 respectively. Therefore, this AGB technique can reduce PCONDUCTION and PSWITCHING by providing appropriate gate overdrive voltages. It also precludes output voltage VOUT from a tradeoff between output load demand and the performance of the power converter and compensates for threshold voltage VTN shift due to process or temperature variation. The operation principle and implementation of the AGB technique are described in detail below.
FIG. 4A shows the circuit schematic of the primary boost converter 20 in FIG. 3. This primary boost converter 20 includes an inductor LBOOST N-type power transistors MN2 and MN2, and the output capacitor COUT. This primary boost converter 20 stores energy when the power transistor MN2 turns ON (MN2 turns OFF) to operate under status PhaseA. The stored energy is then delivered to output voltage VOUT when the power transistor MN2 turns ON (MN2 turns OFF) to operate at status PhaseB. In one embodiment, because output voltage VOUT is targeted to be 0.5V, in the near-VTH region, an N-type power transistor MN2 is employed as the high-side power transistor. Compared with a P-type transistor, an N-type power transistor has higher mobility and superior area efficiency. In addition, only a positive voltage is required for driving an N-type power transistor whereas a voltage ranging from positive to negative potential is essential for a P-type transistor to effectively implement the AGB algorithm. Therefore, in one embodiment, no additional negative voltage converter is required and implemented, and the complexity of the circuit design is reduced.
To simplify the analysis, it is assumed that the primary boost converter 20 operates under continuous conduction mode (CCM), and the inductor current ripple is negligible. In a steady state, PCONDUCTION of power transistors MN2 and MN2 can be expressed as
where IL is the average inductor current flowing through the inductor LBOOST, RDS1,ON and PDS2,ON are the on-resistances of power transistors MN1 and MN2r respectively. Further, T is the clock period, and D is the duty cycle of the signal provided to the power transistor MN1 in a steady state. For a boost converter, the relation between IL and the output load current ILOAD can be expressed as
Therefore, the correlation between PCONDUCTION and ILOAD can be derived as
Hence, if the duty cycle, operation frequency, fabrication process and transistor size of the power transistors are known, PCONDUCTION is in proportion to the square of ILOAD and increases dramatically as ILOAD increases, as given by the equation (3).
By detecting the voltage drop across the power transistors and adjusting the corresponding gate biasing voltages, the proposed AGB technique maintains the turn-on voltages VDS1,ON and VDS2,ON to be about constant.
Therefore, the total conduction loss can be derived from equations (3), (4), and (5) as
If turn-on voltages VDS1,ON and VDS2,ON are constant, PCONDUCTION is proportional only to ILOAD in equation (6) instead of the square function in the conventional equation (3). Therefore, under heavy loads, the conversion efficiency can be improved by employing the AGB technique.
On the other hand, under light-load conditions, PCONDUCTION decreases due to the reduced IL flowing through power transistors, and PSWITCHING dominates the overall efficiency. The AGB technique detects the decreasing turn-on voltages VDS1,ON and VDS2,ON, and the potentials of VAGB1 and VAGB2 are simultaneously reduced to maintain the turn-on voltages VDS1,ON and VDS2,ON across the power transistors MN1 and MN2. Therefore, lower values of gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 decrease PSWITCHING as given by
P
SWITCHING
=f
CK
C
GATE1
V
AGB1
2
+f
CK
C
GATE2
V
AGB2
2 (7)
where fCK is the operation frequency (=1/T), and CGATE1 and CGATE2 are the gate capacitances of the power transistors MN1 and MN2, respectively. Because PSWITCHING is proportional to the square of the gate biasing voltages, VAGB1 and VAGB2 power efficiency is predicted to be higher with the AGB technique under light load. Therefore, by applying the AGB technique, both light-load and heavy-load efficiencies can be improved, as shown in FIG. 4B. The AGB technique automatically adjusts gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 according to ILOAD, so as to manipulate the on-resistances RDS1,ON and RDS2,ON, thus resulting in significant suppression of losses under different load conditions.
AGB circuit 10 in FIG. 3 implements the AGB technique, providing a feedback mechanism to regulate or maintain both turn-on voltages VDS1,ON and VDS2,ON to be about constant, independent from the load condition.
FIG. 5 shows the primary boost converter 20 and the biasing voltage generator 14 in FIG. 3, both composing a SIMO to simultaneously generate output voltage VOUT, and gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 Capacitors C1 and C2 are used to stabilize gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 Inductor LBOOST N-type power transistors MN1 and MN2, and P-type power transistor MP1 and MP2 are responsible for the energy stored and released in different time slots within a period T. Energy is delivered from input voltage VIN via being stored in inductor LBOOST, and then distributed to the three output terminals through time-multiplexing control accompanied with skipping modulation, which precludes output voltage VOUT from the crosstalk between gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 and will be discussed later.
FIG. 6 demonstrates the PWM generator 18 in FIG. 3, including a latch comparator 22 and a 7-bit DPWM (digital PWM) generator 24. The latch comparator 22 compares output voltage VOUT with a reference voltage VREF, which is 0.5V for this embodiment, and controls the duty cycle of DPWM signal CKPWM via the high-resolution DPWM unit 24. For instance, if output voltage VOUT is below reference voltage VREF the duty cycle of DPWM signal CKPWM increases stepwise by a fixed amount. Accordingly, in a steady state, output voltage VOUT could be regulated at the reference voltage VREF To reduce power consumption by DPWM unit 24 and the driver circuit, a clock frequency of 100 kHz is selected in this embodiment, as demonstrated by the reference clock signal CK in FIG. 6.
FIG. 7 details the POUT detector 12 and level-shift and driver module 16 of FIG. 3. The POUT detector 12 has latch comparators PD1 and PD2, and ERC unit 26, while the level-shift and driver module 16 has level shifters 28 and 30, and drivers 32 and 34.
The latch comparator PD1 detects the voltage difference between VX and VSS during the ON time of the power transistor MN1. In other words, it detects the turn-on voltage VDS1,ON, with which a predetermined value VOFFSET1 is compared to generate skip signal SKIP1 Similarly, the latch comparator PD2 detects the voltage difference between VX and output voltage VOUT, which is the turn-on voltage VDS2,ON Turn-on voltage VDS2,ON is compared with a predetermined value VOFFSET2 to generate skip signal SKIPS. When SKIP1 is “1” in logic, it means turn-on voltage VDS1,ON is below or equal to the predetermined value VOFFSET1. When SKIP1 is “0” in logic, turn-on voltage VDS1,ON exceeds the predetermined value VOFFSET1. Skip signal SKIP2 in logic “1” means the turn-on voltage VDS2,ON is below or equal to the predetermined value VOFFSET2, while that in logic “0” means the turn-on voltage VDS2,ON exceeds the predetermined value VOFFSET2. The latch comparators PD1 and PD2 are illustrated in FIGS. 8A and 8B, respectively. The predetermined value VOFFSET1 is implemented using the intentionally mismatched PMOSFET input pair in FIG. 8A, and the predetermined value VOFFSET2 is implemented using the intentionally mismatched NMOSFET input pair in FIG. 8B. In FIG. 7, ERC unit 26 decides whether to pull low gate control signals VGP1 and VGP2 at corresponding time slots, depending on skip signals SKIP1 and SKIP2.
FIG. 9 shows four different operation statuses PathA, PathB, PathC, and PathD for the SIMO of FIG. 5. FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C and 10D show the inductor current waveforms when the SIMO of FIG. 5 operates at the four statuses, respectively. Under operation status PhaseA, power transistor MN1 turns ON and the energy is stored from input voltage VIN in inductor LBOOST, and the duty cycle CKPWM for this time slot is determined by the 7-bit DPWM unit 24. Part of the energy accumulated in status PhaseA is then distributed to gate biasing voltage VAGB2 under the status PhaseD, via the turn-on of power transistor MP2, where gate biasing voltage VAGB2 is the highest voltage in this system for this embodiment. Sequentially and similarly, the energy accumulated in status PhaseA is partially provided for gate biasing voltage VAGB1 under the status PhaseC, via the turn-on of power transistor MP1. Finally, output voltage VOUT receives the rest of the accumulated energy under status PhaseB to fulfill the output load. Even though the status sequence shown in FIGS. 10A to 10D is (PhaseA, PhaseD, PhaseC, PhaseB), this invention is not limited to, and a different status sequence is possibly employed in another embodiment. Statuses PhaseD and PhaseC are necessary for generating adaptive gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2; however, they inevitably cause discontinuous conduction and disturbance for primary output voltage VOUT. To overcome this problem, the pulse width of the driving signals provided for power transistors MP1 and MP2 is limited to 100 ns to restrict the amount of power transferred to gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2. In other words, if any of power transistors MP1 and MP2 turns ON, the ON time will be always 100 ns. Additionally, status PhaseD is activated only when the turn-on voltage VDS2,ON exceeds the predetermined value VOFFSET2 while status PhaseC is activated only when the turn-on voltages VDS1,ON exceeds the predetermined value VOFFSET1.
The power consumed by gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 is typically less than one percent of that of the primary output voltage VOUT. Therefore, the ERC unit 26 in FIG. 7 implements a skipping modulation mode to avoid large disparity in load conditions among VAGB1, VAGB2 and VOUT. FIG. 11 shows the energy delivery mechanism of near-VTH ERC and skipping modulation in response to skip signals SKIP1 and SKIP2 Generally, three output terminals receive energy to maintain their voltage levels, as shown in mode IV when skip signals SKIP1 and SKIP2 are both “0” in logic. In the mode III when skip signals SKIP1 and SKIP2 are “0” and “1” respectively, the status PhaseD is skipped and gate biasing voltage VAGB2 does not receive energy. Similarly, In the mode II when skip signals SKIP1 and SKIP2 are “1” and “0” respectively, the status PhaseC is skipped and gate biasing voltage VAGB1 does not receive energy. When both the gate biasing voltages VAGB1 and VAGB2 are high enough to keep the turn-on voltages VDS1,ON and VDS2,ON below or equal to the predetermined values VOFFSET1 and VOFFSET2 respectively, P-type power transistors MP1 and MP2 are constantly kept OFF, and both the statuses PhaseC and PhaseD are skipped, as shown in the mode I. If the status PhaseC (PhaseD) is skipped, the gate biasing voltages VAGB1 (VAGB2) ramps down due to PSWITCHING, and the turn-on voltage VDS1,ON (VDS2,ON) in a subsequent switch cycle increases as a result. Therefore, by appropriate energy delivery management, the proposed near-VT ERC and skipping modulation technique ensure that each of three voltages is sufficiently isolated and independent of the others to stabilize the entire power converter.
It is shown by the mode IV in FIG. 11 that the 100 nS after status PhaseA is for status PhaseD, the 100 nS after which is for status PhaseC, which is followed by status PhaseB.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. To the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements (as would be apparent to those skilled in the art). Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.