The present application relates to the magnetic resonance arts. It finds particular application in magnetic resonance imaging coils and scanners, and will be described with particular reference thereto. More generally, it finds application in magnetic resonance systems for imaging, spectroscopy, and so forth.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) apparatus is commonly used for the examination of patients. In MRI, RF coils are used to generate B1 fields within the imaging subject for exciting the nuclear spins and to detect signals from the nuclear spins.
In some multi-channel transmit/receive MRI systems, one of a plurality of transmitting units is assigned to each RF coil or coil segment and provided for independently adjusting the amplitude and/or the phase and/or the shape of the RF waveform to be transmitted; while one of a plurality of receiving units is assigned to each RF coil or coil segment. More specifically, independent amplitudes and/or the phases and/or the shapes of the RF waveforms to be transmitted are used to compensate for dielectric resonances in examination objects or to excite and optimize a desired excitation pattern or to shorten the transmit pulse length such as in Transmit SensE.
Locating several RF transmitters in close proximal alignment causes mutual coupling between the antenna or coil elements. The phases and amplitudes of the currents in coupled antenna elements become interrelated. Power is exchanged among the RF transmit channels.
One method to compensate for mutual coupling is to use passive decoupling networks. Passive decoupling methods are applicable in a useful manner for a limited number of coils since the determination of the capacitive and/or inductive elements becomes rather difficult for a large number of channels. In addition, a decoupling and matching network can only be determined and assembled for the expected standard load, which is not necessarily the actual load. At higher fields, small changes in load can have a significant effect on the decoupling of elements. Another problem in the passive decoupling networks includes the presence of parasitic capacitances and inductances of the connectors, which might cause undesired resonances.
The present application provides new and improved methods and apparatuses which overcome the above-referenced problems and others.
In accordance with one aspect, a coil system is disclosed. A coil includes coil elements. The coil at least one of transmits radio frequency excitation pulses into an examination region and receives responsive radio frequency pulses from the examination region. A compensation network includes decoupling segments, which each has a selected electrical length at least of a quarter wavelength (or an equivalent) and is electrically coupled to an associated coil element and a reactive network which includes capacitors and/or inductors. The compensation network at least compensates magnetic coupling between the coil elements.
In accordance with another aspect, a magnetic resonance system is disclosed. A main magnet generates a main magnetic field through an examination region. A plurality of RF transmitters generates RF resonance excitation pulses at a resonance frequency of selected dipoles in the examination region. A plurality of RF receivers receives and demodulates resonance signals from dipoles in the examination region. A plurality of RF coil elements is disposed adjacent the examination region. A plurality of effective quarter wavelength cables, each including an RF cable conductor, is connected between the coil elements and the reactive network. At least one of the transmitters and/or receivers can be connected to the coil via the cables.
One advantage is that each coil element is decoupled from the other coil elements individually.
Still further advantages of the present invention will be appreciated to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understand the following detailed description.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
With reference to
With continuing reference to
A reconstruction processor, algorithm, device, or other means 62 reconstructs the stored magnetic resonance data into a reconstructed image of the imaging subject 16 or a selected portion thereof lying within the examination region 14. The reconstruction processor 62 employs a Fourier transform reconstruction technique or other suitable reconstruction technique that comports with the spatial encoding used in the data acquisition. The reconstructed image is stored in an image memory 64, and can be displayed on a user interface 66, transmitted over a local area network or the Internet, printed by a printer, or otherwise utilized. In the illustrated embodiment, the user interface 66 also enables a radiologist or other user to interface with the imaging controller 50 to select, modify, or execute imaging sequences. In other embodiments, separate user interfaces are provided for operating the scanner 10 and for displaying or otherwise manipulating the reconstructed images.
The described magnetic resonance imaging system 8 is an illustrative example. In general, substantially any magnetic resonance imaging scanner can incorporate the disclosed radio frequency coils. For example, the scanner can be an open magnet scanner, a vertical bore scanner, a low-field scanner, a high-field scanner, or so forth. In the embodiment of
With particular reference to
With reference to
Each cable assembly 98 includes an associated cable shield or shield or shield conductor 130 connected to a second connection point 132 of each associated element 381, 382, . . . , 38n and the RF shield 40 which might be connected to a ground point 134 of the reactive network 100.
In one embodiment, a switching device 140 such as PIN diode is coupled between the second connection point 108 of the conductor 104 and ground point 134 for detuning the element 381, 382, . . . , 38n by grounding an associated cable 98. When a body coil is used for transmit and a local coil is used for receive, the switching devices 140 on the local coil are controlled to detune the local coil on transmit, e.g. the switching diodes are forward biased. Similarly, the switching devices 140 on the body coil can detune the body coil during receive. Optionally, additional tuning elements can be connected in parallel to the switching devices 140 to tune the coil elements.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
In one embodiment, the cable assembly 98 is used to match the impedances of the coil elements to the impedance(s) of feeding or transmitting line(s) 170. This can be realized by choosing the appropriate line impedances for the cables 98. It is also contemplated that the feeding line 170 can be connected directly to the coil 36, optionally, via a matching network.
To explain the theory of the decoupling described above:
Generally, in a transmission line, which extends from z=−∞ to z=+∞, the voltage U (z) and current I (z) are z dependent, where z is the position. As used in this document, the underlined values are peak phasors, e.g. I(t)=real(I*exp(jwt)). With an apostrophe describing the deviation in space z, the differential equations can be derived for the voltage U and current I (in z-direction):
U′=−Z′I (1)
I′=−Y′U (2)
The wave equations are derived as:
U″=Z′Y′U (3)
I″=Z′Y′I (4)
The general solutions for the voltage and current are:
U=U1e−γz+U2e+γz (5)
I=1/Z0(U1e−γz−U2e+γz) (6)
The wave impedance Z0 is a ratio of voltage and current for a traveling wave in one direction is:
Z0=√(Z′/Y′) (7)
The wave number of the transmission line is related to the speed and damping of the transmission and is:
γ=√(Z′Y′) (8)
Assuming that the transmission line extends from −∞ the position z equal to 0 with the boundary condition U=ZI, given by the impedance Z, for the position z equal to 0, equations (5) and (6) can be written as:
For high frequencies, it is more convenient to use wave amplitudes, which are related to the power. For example, for the transmission lines of the TEM coil, the wave amplitudes a, b of the waves in the positive and negative z-direction are determined as:
a(z=0):=U1/√(2Z0) (10)
b(z=0):=U2/√(2Z0) (11)
As observed from equations (10) and (11), the reflection coefficient r defined in equation (9) is the ratio of b to a. For any position z, the first and second wave amplitudes a, b can be expressed as:
a(z):=1/√(8Z0)(U(z)+Z0I(z)) (12)
b(z):=1/√(8Z0)(U(z)+Z0I(z)) (13)
The first and second wave amplitudes a and b can also describe a linear N-port device. In this case, the first and second wave amplitudes a and b become vectors. The transmission line impedance for each port can be written in as a vector:
The vectors of the first and second wave amplitudes for each port can be presented as:
By solving equations (14) and (15), the values for voltage and current are:
A linear device can be presented by an impedance matrix, admittance matrix or scattering matrix accordingly expressed in equations (18), (19) and (20):
{right arrow over (U)}=Z{right arrow over (I)} (18)
{right arrow over (I)}=Y{right arrow over (U)} (19)
{right arrow over (b)}=S{right arrow over (a)} (20)
The relationship between Z and Y is given by inversion. The scattering matrix S is derived from the equations (18)-(20) using equations (14)-(15) and (16)-(17):
Equation (22) is a generalized formulation of the reflection factor r of equation (9).
A quater wave line has the following scattering matrix
A system of N quarter wave lines from port 1, . . . , N to port N+1, . . . , 2N results in the scattering matrix Sλ/4:
where j denotes a diagonal matrix of j=√−1.
Connecting ports N+1, . . . , 2N to a device which has a scattering matrix Sd results in a scattering matrix (related to the not connected ports):
S=−Sd (28)
If the device which has a scattering matrix Sd, and an admittance matrix Yd is transformed by such a set of quarter wave lines, the resulting impedance matrix is:
For example, the coil includes N elements which resonate at the operating frequency f=ω/(2π). If each element is opened to generate a port, a N-port network can be generated. If a short is connected to port n and all the other ports are left open, then the element number n becomes resonant at the frequency f while other elements are not operating.
The diagonal elements of the impedance matrix Zcoil of the coil are defined by:
The non diagonal elements of the impedance matrix Zcoil of the coil system are given by the mutual inductance:
Zcoil
In the ideal case of completely decoupled coil elements, the impedance matrix has only diagonal elements unequal to zero. In fact, in the majority of cases, the non-diagonal elements of the impedance matrix include non-zero values that have to be compensated. A compensation network or device, which includes N-ports and has an impedance matrix Zdec, is coupled in series to the coil Zcoil at each port. A combined impedance matrix ZΣ for N ports of the coil system, which includes the coil and compensation network, can be defined for the resulting structure. In the coil system, the currents are the same in all parts, e.g. the current in the coil system is equal to the current in the coil and current in the compensation network:
{right arrow over (I)}Σ={right arrow over (I)}coil={right arrow over (I)}dec, where
Voltage in the coil system is equal to a sum of the voltages in the coil and compensation network:
{right arrow over (U)}Σ={right arrow over (U)}coil+{right arrow over (U)}dec, where
A combined impedance matrix ZΣ of the coil system is equal a sum of impedances in the coil and compensation network:
ZΣ=Zcoil+Zdec (34)
The coil system has to be decoupled, e.g. only the imaginary parts of the diagonal elements in the coil impedance matrix ZΣ can be unequal to zeroes. In addition, since the combined system has to be resonant, the diagonal elements in the combined impedance matrix ZΣ have to be equal to the real numbers.
The non diagonal elements of the compensation network are tuned to:
Zdec
If the diagonal elements of the compensation impedance matrix of the compensation network deviate from zero, this results in a resonance frequency shift of the elements. This can be retuned by resonance capacitors in each element.
To tune each element individually, the described above transmission lines with a length of (z/2+¼) λ, where λ is the wave length inside the cable and z is an integer.
An impedance Z (or admittance Y) is transformed by such line to:
This can be generalized for a set of quarter wave lines with different line impedances:
Zdec=diag{right arrow over (Z)}0{tilde over (Y)}decdiag{right arrow over (Z)}0 (36)
In this manner, by changing a set of symmetric elements {tilde over (Y)}m,n and {tilde over (Y)}n,m in {tilde over (Y)}d only the corresponding elements Zdec,m,n and Zdec,n,m in Zdec are changed. A symmetric (what means {tilde over (Y)}dec={tilde over (Y)}decT) device is built where the non diagonal elements of the admittance matrix can be tuned individually. This is simply done by placing admittances −{tilde over (Y)}ded,m,n from port m to n. In most cases (coupled coil arrays), the mutual inductivities are positive what results in capacitive elements in the decoupling matrix. If the mutual inductivities (or equivalent coupling from different origins) become negative, than inductors are used. After decoupling, the coil elements have to become resonant again. This can be done by adding elements to ground in the Y-device or by retuning the elements by changing the resonance capacitors.
The transmission lines described above have additional advantages:
(1) The decoupling can be placed anywhere, no complicated links have to be build inside the coil.
(2) The coil elements can be switched off (detuned) easily and individually.
(3) The transmission lines can be used to match the coil to the impedance of the feeding system.
The detuning can be solved by simply adding switchable shorts at the individual ends of the transmission lines. The short near the decoupling elements is transformed into an open circuit inside the coil elements. This also works individually, e.g. each element can be switched off while others are still in use.
It is further more possible to match the coil with the decoupling system also by choosing the line impedances (individually) to as Z0=√(Zmatch*Rloss). In this case, the coil can be fed directly at the decoupling circuit. Alternatively, matching can be done anywhere on the elements in a traditional way. A smaller impedance of the transmission lines can be advantageous and can be realized by connecting some lines in parallel. The different line impedances do not affect the possibility to decouple and detune individually.
Generally, the reactive elements 120, 122, 124 of the compensation network 42 can be realized in many ways as long as the non diagonal element of the corresponding Y-Matrix is chosen by the value that enables decoupling. In general, lumped capacitors or inductors will be the best choice.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Modifications and alterations may occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be constructed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/745,459 filed Apr. 24, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/065846 | 4/3/2007 | WO | 00 | 10/20/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/124247 | 11/1/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2764742 | Cady et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
4728896 | Bendall et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4801885 | Meissner et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4812764 | Bendall | Mar 1989 | A |
4833409 | Eash | May 1989 | A |
4947121 | Hayes | Aug 1990 | A |
5260658 | Greim et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
6150816 | Srinivasan | Nov 2000 | A |
6608480 | Weyers | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6900636 | Leussler | May 2005 | B2 |
6904307 | Karmarkar et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7088104 | Bottomley | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7133714 | Karmarkar et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7268550 | Greim | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7560931 | Nabetani | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7747310 | Misic et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7800368 | Vaughan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7885704 | Misic | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020169374 | Jevtic | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030210049 | Boskamp et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040046557 | Karmarkar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040155656 | Leussler | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040236209 | Misic et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040257073 | Greim | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050062472 | Bottomley | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050275403 | Pinkerton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060119361 | Karmarkar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060238198 | Nabetani | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080129298 | Vaughan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090076377 | Findekelee | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076378 | Misic | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002306442 | Oct 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090076377 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60745459 | Apr 2006 | US |