1. Field of the Invention
The specific technical challenge this invention is intended to address is to rapidly cool or quench thermally cracked hydrocarbon gasses to allow the production of olefins (or like desired products) which are a desired product used in the production of many other chemicals in an economical manner. Slower cooling of the cracked gasses produces more waste products, and rapid cooling of the cracked gas by injection of water droplets into the cracked gas stream wastes the heat of the gas and makes more difficult (due to dilution) the removal of the desired product from the cooled gas stream. Currently the shell and tube heat exchangers discussed in below referenced patents are used in industry to cool the cracked gas along with other competing non-shell and tube exchanger designs not of interest to this application, and injection of water droplets in some older facilities. In addition to the desire to cool the cracked gasses rapidly, it is desirable to not cool the cracked gasses below specific values that are well above the boiling point of water at atmospheric pressures, and to maximize energy recovery. The design pressure of the cooling fluid, typically water in the heat exchanger will usually be over 50 barr. This creates difficulties in pressure containment of the cooling fluid in the exchanger that work in opposition to the goal of rapid quench of the cracked gasses. The requirement of rapid cooling of the cracked gasses tends to make a thin layer of metal of the heat exchanger between the cracked gas and cooling fluid desirable such that the film coefficient of boiling of the cooling fluid will dominate the heat transfer such that the metal will stay cool. However, the additional constraint of containing the pressure of the cooling fluid in the exchanger tends to force the shell and especially the tube-sheet of a conventional design shell and tube exchanger to be quite thick, were a conventional shell and tube design used.
2. Prior Art
Vollhard in his 1964 patent (U.S. Pat. No. 3,144,080) teaches a heat exchanger primarily for the purpose of quench cooling thermally cracked hydrocarbon gasses to allow the production of olefins.
The heat exchanger of this patent, rather than using a conventional shell and tube design, uses a bundle of individual tube in tube heat exchangers in arrangements where the cracked gas passes through the inner tube, and the annular portion has water and steam to cool the cracked gas. These annular volumes are manifolded together in patterns shown in that work to use common water inlet tubes and common steam and water outlet tubes. In a later 1967 patent Vollhardt (U.S. Pat. No. 3,348,610) teaches how to make a shell and tube heat exchanger for the same (quench cooling of thermally cracked hydrocarbon gasses to allow the production of olefins.) purpose.
To the knowledge of the inventor this latter design has not been very commercially successful while variations of the former have been very successful. However the former design is expensive in that it requires a great many welds and is rather large in volume for the effective amount of heat exchange area created.
Brucher & Lachmann teach a method to solve the problem of use of a shell and tube heat exchanger in this application by suspending a thin tube-sheet from a thick structural tube-sheet either by structural members called slabs in their 1989 patent (U.S. Pat. No. 4,858,684) or webs in their 1991 patent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,035,283) This basic design in practice restricts the shell and tube exchanger designer to a rectangular arrangement of tubes which is less than ideal in efficient use of space and requires the addition of a second thick shell wall shown in FIG. 1 of their 1991 patent and FIG. 1 of their 1989 patent (item 10 in that patent). These restrictions raise the cost of fabrication of the heat exchanger designed for a given heat load over what might be achieved in less demanding service, however the expense and ratio of heat exchanger area per unit volume tends to be superior to that of the tube in tube Vollhard design of the 1964 patent, and are commercially successful. All of these designs in general use enhanced natural circulation which takes advantage of the difference in density of the cooling fluid in pure liquid phase coming down from a steam drum in down-corner pipe(s) and a mixture of both liquid and vapor phase cooling fluid rising in the riser(s) from the exchanger to the steam-drum. Other means may be used but this is the most common. The pressure difference induced by natural circulation is small, typically significantly less than a barr.
The present invention provides an improvement over the current state of the art of heat exchanger design for production of olefins, and other applications. This improvement is of the form that the present invention allows denser packing of the heat exchanger tube bundle may be used as hexagonal tube arrangements may be used, which is not possible with either the Vollhardt or Brucher & Lachmann designs. Further the expensive and space consuming second outer thick steel shell required by the inventions taught by Brucher & Lachmann are not required with this design.
For a proper understanding of the current invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like parts are given like reference numerals, and wherein:
The current invention is a shell and tube heat exchanger intended primarily for use to rapidly cool or quench thermally cracked hydrocarbon gasses to allow the production of olefins, it may however be used for other purposes. It may be assumed that where not otherwise specified, standard practice for manufacture of shell and tube heat exchangers may be used. The invention in the fundamental embodiment is shown in detail in
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirements of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and in a limiting sense.