This is a §371 National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/IB2013/000101 filed on 29 Jan. 2013, claiming the priority of Italian Patent Application No. MI2012A000141 filed on 3 Feb. 2012.
The present invention relates to a simplified system and method for managing the feed of a plurality of yarns at constant tension and/or velocity to a textile machine, in accordance with the introduction to the corresponding independent claims.
In particular, the invention relates in non-limiting manner, to the management of a plurality of feeders at constant tension and/or velocity for the production of a stocking or other article of graduated compression. Devices are known to the expert of the art able to feed a yarn to a textile machine while maintaining the yarn tension and/or velocity constant and uniform at a set point reference value. In a machine such as a knitting machine or for stocking or web production, a plurality of yarns are fed to the textile machine, these yarns being fed by corresponding feeders of the aforesaid type.
During the production of numerous articles (such as medical stockings, tights, tapes, etc.) the need often arises to modify the set point value (relative to the tension and/or velocity) of said feeders in order to obtain a particular effect in the finished article, as is the case for example in graduated compression stockings.
The producer of such articles is known to require the facility to manage the set point of feeders on the basis of the operative state of the textile machine; in particular, it is required to define for each stocking zone (cuff, leg, ankle, heel, foot, toe), in the specified example, or for another article with parts obtained in differentiated manner (for example swimming costumes, industrial clothing, variable length webs, or the like), the feed tension and/or velocity for each yarn and the manner (velocity) with which the feed device has to pass from one set point to the other as the various article working zones vary.
Two possible solutions are currently known to this problem, valid both in the case of constant tension feeders and in the case of constant velocity feeders; for this reason the following examples, although referring to constant tension feeders, are also valid in the case of constant velocity feeders.
In a first known solution, many feed devices comprise one or more digital inputs through which to manage the modifications to the set point tension (in the case of small and medium diameter circular machines the term “graduations” is used). In this case the operator uses one or more digital outputs, normally present in textile machines and freely programmable, to be connected to the feeder inputs; the operator uses digital signals to modify the set point of each device within the machine operating programme (in the case of small and medium diameter circular machines the term machine “chain” is used).
However this known solution has numerous limits. In particular, “dated” textile machines do not always present digital outputs, hence creating “retrofit” problems for machines already existing on the market, including the fact that different cabling has to be used from machine to machine.
Moreover, the said known solution comprises the use of at least one digital output from the machine for each feed device associated with it to enable the operator to programme the set point of each device independently; the solution hence requires a large number of programmable machine outputs, which are not always available.
In addition, the known art compels the operator to intervene on the machine “chain” and hence on the machine programme to make any modification to the finished product; this means that this solution requires the intervention of a person having detailed knowledge of the operation of the textile machine to which the feeders are connected.
Again, the feed device command signals have to satisfy precise intervention times: for example, “anti-rebound” systems are normally provided in the feeders to prevent an electromagnetic disturbance from being interpreted as a command signal. However, this contrasts with the fact that normally the chain programmes are managed not on a time basis but spatially (i.e. on the basis of the number of cylinder revolutions and the division of each revolution into degrees, hence the term revolutions/degrees). It is hence apparent that the time duration of a command signal is linked not only to the physical position in which it is programmed (revolutions/degrees), but also of the velocity with which the machine is operating at that precise instant, in accordance with the known space-time relationship.
This is therefore difficult for the operator, and requires much experience in generating a chain programme which is not influenced by the machine production velocity; this velocity is in fact normally varied by the operator on the basis of production requirements and production stages; for example while the machine is heating, the machine velocity is normally lower.
Another known solution is based on the fact that many feeders instead comprise serial communication which interfaces with the textile machine control unit, usually of microprocessor type, by which the set point value can be programmed. This solution is obviously decidedly more flexible than the aforegoing, however it still presents the following limits:
Finally, if improvements are made to the feed device, for example by increasing the system resolution, it is not possible to utilize this function on already operating machines without requesting the intervention of the constructor of these latter to modify the feeder management software.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved system and method for managing the feed of a plurality of yarns at constant tension and/or velocity to a textile machine.
A particular object of the invention is to provide a system of the stated type which enables each feeder to be easily managed in terms both of programming and of interfacing with the textile machine.
Another object is to provide a system of the stated type which enables flexible management (i.e. different programming for each feed device) without requiring the use of resources or rather of programmable outputs of the machine.
Another object is to provide a system and method of the stated type which enables feed devices to be managed on any textile machine, even if not arranged for this.
Another object is to provide a method of the stated type which enables the machine operating programme or “programme chain” to be generated in a manner which is simple and intuitive for the operator, without the operator having to worry about its manner of intervention on the feeders, but only of its result on the finished product.
Another object is to provide a system of the stated type which enables the feeder manufacturer to provide a design which is independent of the textile machine on which the feeder is to operate, so enabling the manufacturer to continue to develop and improve the product or family of products, without having to worry about any compatibility difficulty with textile machines, whether already operative or not, as no internal prearrangement of these latter is required, other than the generation of one or two synchronization signals by them.
A further object is to is to provide a system and method of the stated type which enable articles to be created with “fancy effects” in a manner simple for the operator, the term “fancy effects” meaning a zone (repetitive or random) within the work in which the working tension (in the sense of set point) varies repetitively (in accordance with a precise rule, for example with the sequence 2.0→2.5→1.5→2.5→2.0 or randomly).
A further object is to provide a system of the stated type which can be standardized to be usable with any textile machine of any make, model or year of production.
These and further objects which will be apparent to the expert of the art are attained by a system and method in accordance with the accompanying claims.
The present invention will be more apparent from the accompanying drawing, which is provided by way of non-limiting example and in which the single FIGURE shows a scheme of a system obtained in accordance with the invention.
With reference to said FIGURE, this shows various feed devices 1 for feeding yarns (not shown) to a textile machine 2, these devices being shown specifically as mutually different to indicate how the system can contain different yarn feeders 1.
The devices 1 are all connected to an interface unit 3, preferably of the microprocessor type. This interface unit can present a display and/or a keyboard 5 by which an operator can insert or select operating modes for the unit 3 and hence for the system (i.e. an “operating programme” for this latter) and utilize, via the display, information relative to these modes and/or relative to the system operation. The display and/or the keyboard 5 are connected to the unit 3 via a connection line 10. In an improved embodiment, the unit 3 also commands and controls the operation of each device 1.
The interface unit 3 is arranged to manage and modify the set point of the devices 1 for feeding yarn at constant tension and/or velocity. As stated, these devices can be of the same type or be of mutually different type. The management and programming of said devices preferably takes place via a serial line 4 which connects to the unit 3, hence simplifying and consequently reducing the system cabling costs, in particular when the number of devices 1 is particularly high (such as in the case for example of medium and large diameter circular machines).
The invention (method and system) is based on the fact that in nearly all textile processes, in particular for small and medium diameter circular machines, the production process can be divided into a series of repetitive cycles, where one cycle corresponds to the production of a single item (for example a stocking).
Based on this consideration, the unit 1 operates by receiving from the textile machine 2, via electrical or serial connection lines 7 and 8, only two synchronization signals identified by ZPX and PRX, namely a cycle end/working commencement signal and a signal relative to the undergoing of a complete revolution of the cylinder respectively; this enables them always to identify in an absolute and certain manner the state of work advancement of the textile machine.
It is very simple to obtain said ZPX and PRX signals on textile machines which operate in this manner (for example, on circular machines of small and medium diameter), they being obtainable even if the machines are not already set to generate said signals during their construction stage. In fact the PRX signal can be generated by a simple proximity sensor which measures the number of revolutions of the machine cylinder or of any other rotation member; The ZPX signal can be instead generated by a sensor, always present on this type of machine, which controls the expulsion of the item or finished product or can be generated by the programme chain (i.e. the machine operating programme) and fed to the unit 3 by using two programmable outputs (not shown) of a control unit for the machine (also not shown), of known type.
The unit 3 receives, via a further communication port and a connection line (electrical or serial) 10, data relative to the “operating programme” associated with the production article, i.e. relative to the productive modes of each individual portion of said article, data which are saved within a memory present in the unit. In this respect, as stated, this article can comprise parts or zones obtained with different yarns or with the same yarn, but fed to the textile machine with different tension and/or velocity so as to obtain said zones with characteristics (for example of strength or compactness or appearance) individual to the part itself and different from those of the adjacent product zones.
By loading said data or operating programme, the unit 3 is able to obtain and set (and possibly control) the operation of each individual feed device 1 with specific modalities which are a function of the article under production, its productive stage and the yarn used for its production. This loading takes place for example via a PC connected to the unit 3, via a USB key, an SDI card, an Ethernet connection, WiFi connection or similar devices (exemplified by way of example by a block 11 in the FIGURE).
The “operating programme” comprises a table of the following type.
In the aforegoing table, the term “step” indicates the advancement state of the working cycle (progressive number for example of the PRX pulses or of the cylinder revolutions received by the machine 2); for each step, a column is provided associated with each feed device (DEV n) in which for the specific feeder, the reference tension and/or velocity SP(x,y) associated with the specific productive stage is memorized. Evidently this table is composed of as many rows as the “steps” for the article under production, corresponding to different productive stages of the article, i.e. the production of each of its individual parts (linked precisely to each cylinder revolution).
This “operating programme” is set by an operator and comprises, for example, subdividing the individual production cycle of an article into its different working zones (for example for a stocking: cuff, leg, ankle, heel, foot, toe) and defining for each working zone simply the number of constituent “steps” of the zone, for example 30; on the basis of this division, defining for each subdivision the initial feed tension and/or velocity, the final tension and/or velocity, and possibly the number of steps in which the change has to take place (for example: initial tension of device 1 equal to 2.0 grams; final tension equal to 3.0 grams, to be reached in five steps). The working tension can also be caused to vary repetitively within a working zone or even within a single step to achieve fancy effects on the article.
This working zone can be repetitive or random in the series of articles produced.
The unit 3 hence provides operating data to each device 1 for each zone in accordance with a specific table.
An example relative to the production of a cuff (zone) of a stocking is given in the following table.
Hence by virtue of the invention, for the operator the management of each individual feed device 1 of a plurality of devices is extremely simple: it is in fact the “operating programme” of the unit 3 which implements any passage from one tension and/or velocity to the other by utilizing the maximum possible resolution (i.e. the minimum programmable tension) of the device to be managed. By using a unit 3 operating in accordance with the aforegoing description, it also becomes very simple for the operator to intervene and modify the final result during the article definition stage.
Consequently, the unit 3 operates in accordance with a method consisting of subdividing the operating mode for obtaining each individual article into a series of production steps for each individual zone of the article, said production steps being identified by signals corresponding to each cylinder revolution. On the basis of this division, for each individual step and for each individual feed device 1, the unit 3 sets (and advantageously manages) the operation of this latter, its mode of intervention on the yarn (i.e. the definition of its feed tension and/or velocity); the unit 3 can also control the production of the article in each of its individual portions, i.e. in each part of each of its individual zones. In this case, the unit 3 intervenes on each individual device 1 in order to maintain the yarn characteristic (tension and/or velocity) controlled at a value which corresponds to that which has been predefined or programmed or defined after an initial verified and accepted sample product (i.e., in general terms, “set”) chosen for each individual portion of each individual product zone. If the measured value and the set value do not correspond, the unit 3 is able to intervene on the individual device to equalize these values.
From the aforegoing, it is evident that the unit 3, by operating in the modes corresponding to the tabled data relative to each working zone, and knowing the machine operating state by the analysis of the PRX and ZPX pulses received, is able to modify the set point of each device on the basis of the state of advancement of the work; in fact for each connected device 1 the control unit 3 has simply to limit itself to modifying the set point of that device at each PRX pulse received.
As the “operating programme” is the result of data set in the unit 3 in a manner independent of the textile machine 2 and of the type of feeder 1 connected, it is evident that the operating data of the unit 3 can be set differently on the basis of each type of feeder 1 or possibly of the hardware/software version of the feed device connected, hence enabling the yarn feed device manufacturer to continue to develop his own products independently of the need to maintain compatibility with the particular textile machine to which such products are to be connected, or compatibility with other feed devices connected to the machine.
A particular embodiment of the invention has been described. However the following modifications can be made to that described heretofore.
In a variant, the individual feeders 1 can be managed by the control and interface unit 3 not via the serial line 4 but via a series of hardware exit commands from the unit (INC, DEC or other commands), as provided for by the state of the art in certain feed devices.
According to another variant, the ZPX signal is not provided, the unit 3 recognizing passage from the cycle (n) to the cycle (n+1) by time-out, i.e. by measuring the time interval during which PRX signals are not generated.
Alternatively, the unit senses this passage as a time interval in which no device 1 is in the feed stage. If the ZPX signal is not present, the unit 3 can also recognize passage from the cycle (n) to the cycle (n+1) every N pulses of the PRX signal. This solution can be advantageously utilized for large diameter circular machines or for continuous working machines (such as tape production looms) where the length of a cycle is predefined, for example equal to 1524 PRX.
According to a further variant, the PRX signal can be withdrawn not as a pulse at every revolution, but as several pulses per revolution (for example by connecting the unit 3 to the encoder usually associated with the machine). In this case, resolution in terms of working tension (and/or velocity) programming is decidedly greater.
Moreover, advantageously the table corresponding to each device for each step can include not only the yarn feed tension and/or velocity, but also the activation of special functions, such as that for recognizing any broken yarn. Hence in this case the broken yarn function would be enabled and disabled at the working zone of the device 1 automatically by the unit 3, hence recognizing the absence or breakage of a yarn or its use in an undesirable zone.
The “operating programme” can be optimized in terms of space (memory occupation), for example by showing in the tables only the variations of state for each device.
In a further alternative embodiment, the table showing tension settings based on the work advancement state could be contained in the memory of each feed device 1 and the PRX and ZPR synchronization signals be made to reach the feed devices 1 either directly or via the unit 3.
In another variant, the display and/or keyboard 5 operates as the control unit 3 and interfaces directly with the feed devices 1 and synchronization signals ZPX and PRX.
In a further variant of the invention, the display and/or keyboard 5 is either external to the control unit 3 or in fact does not exist.
Finally, according to a further variant, a first device 1 of the plurality of devices contains the unit 3, the other devices 1 of said plurality receiving the setting of said first device 1. In the mode in which the unit 3 also controls the operation of each feed device, if the unit 3 is contained in the aforesaid first device 1, this latter commands and controls the operation of all the other feed devices mounted on the machine.
These variants are also to be considered as falling within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2012A0141 | Feb 2012 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2013/000101 | 1/29/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/114174 | 8/8/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5566574 | Tiziano | Oct 1996 | A |
5838570 | Barea | Nov 1998 | A |
6321576 | Barea | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6418977 | Tholander | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6550285 | Nishitani | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7699258 | Barea | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7896282 | Barea | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20050061388 | Josefsson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050173579 | Barea | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20080256983 | Weber | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090139271 | Barea | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3002311 | Jul 1981 | DE |
2067886 | Jun 2009 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 6, 2013 for PCT/IB2013/000101 to BTSR INTERNATIONAL S.P.A. filed Jan. 29, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150039120 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |