An event-based analysis engine reacts to one or more events. For example, if an event occurs, the event-based analysis engine performs an action based on a rule. In one particular example, the event may be based on historical information.
In one aspect, a method, includes receiving and storing objects in a repository, translating objects in an object repository format to a graphical user interface (GUI) format, rendering the GUI format to a user, receiving a rule from the user using the GUI format, translating the rule in the GUI format to a rule repository format, storing rule in the rule repository format in a rule repository and compiling the rule in the rule repository format into a format that is acceptable for processing by the event based analysis engine.
In another aspect, an article includes a non-transitory machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions. The instructions cause a machine to receive and store objects in a repository, translate objects in an object repository format to a graphical user interface (GUI) format, render the GUI format to a user, receive a rule from the user using the GUI format, translate the rule in the GUI format to a rule repository format, store rule in the rule repository format in a rule repository and compile the rule in the rule repository format into a format that is acceptable for processing by the event based analysis engine.
In a further aspect, an apparatus includes circuitry configured to receive and store objects in a repository, translate objects in an object repository format to a graphical user interface (GUI) format, render the GUI format to a user, receive a rule from the user using the GUI format, translate the rule in the GUI format to a rule repository format, store rule in the rule repository format in a rule repository and compile the rule in the rule repository format into a format that is acceptable for processing by the event based analysis engine.
An event-based analysis engine uses rules to evaluate the events. The rules are written in a particular format that is specific to the type of event-based analysis rules engine product being used. Thus, it is complicated for a user who is a non-developer to add or even manage the rules. For example, the user would need an extensive knowledge of the domain and the way the objects and events are stored in the particular event-based analysis engine being used by the user. In order to generate a rule the user would need to know the correct object name and attributes that exists in the product and the way to map between them. Additionally, in order to generate a complex rule that combines two objects from different domains, the user would need to merge between two different objects, know how those objects relate to each other and how to match between relevant attributes.
Described herein are techniques to generate rules for an event-based analysis engine. For example, the techniques described herein are an intuitive and user friendly way that enable the user to easily configure rules using a graphical user interface (GUI) on the objects that are either monitored by the system or added for monitoring by third party products for example, using an expansion service (agent). In another example, the techniques described herein combine several objects that enable the user to easily configure rules using a graphical user interface (GUI) on the objects that are either monitored by the system or added for monitoring by third party products, for example, using an expansion service (agent). The GUI described herein displays the hierarchy as known/familiar by the user. Additionally, for a related object the GUI described herein displays the relationships between different objects in an intuitive way. In one particular example, an object is displayed with its related objects rendered underneath the object in a hierarchical tree, for example, so that it will be easy for the user to define a rule that is built by two different objects with a relationship without the need to define the merge condition in an unfamiliar domain. When the user chooses a related object, the system selects the object and the related objects, does an internal merge between them and intersects the related object according to its context (parent object).
The user can navigate from the top level object to its components and selects the required component. When the user chooses a component, the system selects the object and its parents and does an internal merge between them.
Referring to
The repositories 108 describe the definitions of the different domain objects and additionally describe the relationship between the different domain objects and between the objects and their components in the same domain. As used herein, a domain is a collection of objects in a particular environment. For example, the environment can be a continuous data protection environment and the objects can be data protection appliances, hosts, storage arrays, applications and so forth.
The repositories 108 can obtain information and relationships from any data-source using the expansion agent 128. The repositories 108 include a metadata repository 152 and a rules repository 158. The rules repository 158 stores the rules in a rules repository format. For example, the rules repository 158 stores the rules generated by the user using the GUI 112 that will be used by the event-based analysis engine 102.
The metadata repository 152 stores object types, object hierarchy and the relationships of the objects to each other in an object repository format. In particular, an object is part of an object type and each object is related to one or more other objects.
Each object also has one or more attributes. Any attribute of an object that is monitored and is not part of the object is stored. For example, every “Host” object has its Internet Protocol (IP) attribute that may contain multiple values.
The metadata repository 152 also stores a relationship of an object to its attributes and components (Object Extension) and a relationship between an object to its related cross-domain objects (context).
The repositories 108 collect information from multiple data-sources/domains and are able to validate rules that are (1) from the same domain because the relationship between the objects is retrieved from the data-source/domains and (2) from multiple domains in case the user defines the relationship of the objects from different data-sources/domains.
The GUI component 122 includes an interface that allows the user to define a rule in a few steps. For example, the user selects a required object, configures a condition to trigger an alert and defines the alert (see
Additionally, when the user selects an object the user can choose any attribute or can navigate from the selected object to any of its related objects as described further herein.
The translator 116 translates the information from the GUI format that includes a rule to a format compatible with the rules repository 158, a rules repository format. The translator 116 also converts the objects, events and relationships between the objects from the metadata repository 152 in an object repository format into the GUI format for presentation to the user through the GUI 112. In one example, the GUI format includes a tree of objects (object hierarchy) that is known to the user. In another example, the object hierarchy is configured by the user.
The compiler 122 compiles the rules repository format into a format compatible with the event-based analysis engine rules 102.
The expansion agent 128 enables the addition of new objects into the system 100 including relationships between the new objects and relationships to existing objects. In one example, the expansion agent 108 may be used by external products to have the system monitor & alert on any event that is sent by the external product.
Referring to
Referring to
The alert trigger section 206 includes a select alert trigger portion 206 that a user activates to select an alert trigger. In one example, the select alert trigger portion 206 is a hypertext or a button that a user activates using a mouse, for example. By activating the select alert trigger portion 206 the user may choose from a list of alert triggers. The user can also configure the condition which triggers the alert. For example, if a utilization of a host exceeds 96%, trigger the alert.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring back to
Referring to
Since an alert may be based on more than one object, the user may be able to assign a related object without understanding or knowing how the objects are related. Using the GUI 112, the user is able to generate rules for the event-based analysis engine without the need to choose the different objects and specify the relationships and the conditions; but rather, just to get the relationship automatically by looking for the object attributes or related data. For example, the user wants to see how much free space is left for an application on the storage arrays. The user chooses this application and then navigates through the related objects to the attributes the user wishes to utilize. By navigating through the object's hierarchical tree and its related objects, the user can easily find all the attributes that he would like to monitor or display in the report without the need to understand the object model structure and to define the relationship and condition between the different objects.
The GUI 112 using the GUI format presents objects, object hierarchy, events and relationships in a manner that is familiar to the user and is intuitive in the way the user can find the related object according to its contexts. For example, when a user would like to observe the backup jobs of a host (the host and backup jobs are objects and events from different domains), the user will go to the host and will be able to select the related backup jobs of the host, without the need to define the relationship between them.
In one particular example, an object tree 200 includes a hierarchy for an object, for example, an application object 222. A second level of the object tree 200 under the application object 222 includes attributes 232 and related objects 234. The attributes 232 include a name 236 and size 238 parameters in the third level of the object tree 200.
The related objects 234 includes object types that are related to the application in the third level of the object tree 200. For example, the object types include a host object type 242a and storage devices object type 242b in the fourth level of the object tree 200. The storage devices object type 242b includes objects such as storage array 270a and pools 270b in the fifth level of the object tree 200. Each object includes an attribute. For example, the storage array 270a includes an attribute 272 which includes total capacity 272a, used capacity 272b and free capacity 272c and the pools 270a includes an attribute 274 which includes total capacity 284a, used capacity 284b and free capacity 284c.
Using the object tree 200, a user can tie an application object to its related object, a storage array and be able to use the attributes for the storage array to establish a rule.
Referring to
Process 300 translates data from the repositories 108 to the GUI format (308). For example, the translator 116 translates objects, objects types and the relationships of the objects from the metadata repository 152 in the object repository format into a GUI format for presentation to the user through the GUI 112. Process 300 renders the GUI format to the user (312) and receives input from the user using the GUI 112 (316). The input from the user forms a rule that will be executed by the event-based analysis engine 102.
Process 300 translates the GUI format containing the rule into the rule repository format (318) and stores the rule in the rule repository 158 (326). For example, the translator 116 translates the GUI format into the rule repository format. Process 300 compiles, using the compiler 122, the rule in the rule repository format into a format acceptable by the event-based analysis engine 102 (334).
Referring to
Process 400 receives a configuration of a condition to trigger the alert (408). For example, the user uses the window 200 and activates the select alert trigger portion 208. In one example, the user is presented with different conditions and the user selects which condition to use and the specific parameters.
Process 400 receives a definition of the alert (412). For example, the user, using the window 200, activates the select edit portion 212. In one example, the user defines the alert. For example, the user is presented with a series of alert options and the user selects one of the alert options to define the alert.
Referring to
The processes described herein (e.g., the processes 300 and 400) are not limited to use with the hardware and software of
The system may be implemented, at least in part, via a computer program product, (e.g., in a machine-readable storage device), for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus (e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers)). Each such program may be implemented in a high level procedural or object-oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the programs may be implemented in assembly or machine language. The language may be a compiled or an interpreted language and it may be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network. A computer program may be stored on a storage medium or device (e.g., CD-ROM, hard disk, or magnetic diskette) that is readable by a general or special purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the computer when the storage medium or device is read by the computer to perform the processes described herein. The processes described herein may also be implemented as a machine-readable storage medium, configured with a computer program, where upon execution, instructions in the computer program cause the computer to operate in accordance with the processes. A non-transitory machine-readable medium may include but is not limited to a hard drive, compact disc, flash memory, non-volatile memory, volatile memory, magnetic diskette and so forth but does not include a transitory signal per se.
The system and processes described herein are not limited to the specific examples described. For example, the processes 300 and 400 are not limited to the specific processing order of
The processing blocks (for example, in the process 300 of
Elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Other embodiments not specifically described herein are also within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7076685 | Pillai et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7409379 | Katzer | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7482931 | Lin | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7606813 | Gritsay et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7613726 | Spivak et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7668953 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7761594 | Mowat | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7836427 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8224761 | Rockwood | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8949168 | Blitzer et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9098804 | Blitzer et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9195631 | Blitzer et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
20040093581 | Nielsen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117407 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040250258 | Raghuvir et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050125688 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050246304 | Knight et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060179028 | Bram et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179042 | Bram et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179058 | Bram et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070094199 | Deshpande et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070198478 | Yu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070260470 | Bornhoevd et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080196006 | Bates et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090019000 | Arends et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049508 | Kaminsky et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090113387 | Ziegler | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150319 | Matson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171879 | Bullen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090287628 | Indeck et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100128676 | Wu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100175055 | Wang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198636 | Choudhary et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110138291 | Twiddy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141913 | Clemens et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167433 | Appelbaum et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191692 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238452 | Ziade et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120131185 | Petersen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120291008 | Bates et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120317504 | Patel et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120317541 | Kaulgud et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130132108 | Solilov et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130191185 | Galvin | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140165140 | Singla et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Blitzer et al.; “Providing Historical Data to an Event-Based Analysis Engine;” U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524, filed Mar. 26, 2012; 17 pages. |
Blitzer et al.; “Managing a Memory of an Even-Based Analysis Engine;” U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,481, filed Jun. 27, 2012; 22 pages. |
Blitzer et al.; “Simplifying Rules Generation for an Even-Based Analysis Engine by Allowing a User to Combine Related Objects in a Rule;” U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,159, filed Jun. 26, 2012; 29 pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; Response Filed on Oct. 6, 2014, 13 Pages. |
Office Action date Nov. 6, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; 23 Pages. |
Blitzer et al.; “Using Data Aggregation to Manage a Memory for an Event-Based Analysis Engine;” U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,855, 24 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524, 13 pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,481, 10 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,159, 14 pages. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office dated Dec. 10, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,855; 14 Pages. |
Tucker et al., “Method of Processing Events for Real-Time Analysis of Key Processes of an Enterprise;” Patent Application AU 2010212459; filed Aug. 20, 2010; Published Mar. 24, 2011; 34 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,481; Response Filed on Oct. 20, 2014; 11 Pages. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,159; 22 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,159, 13 pages. |
Response to Final Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; Response filed on Mar. 6, 2015; 13 Pages. |
Request for Continued Examination dated Mar. 6, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; 3 Pages. |
Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; 37 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 5, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,481; 9 Pages. |
Appeal Brief in Response to the Final Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2014; Appeal Brief filed Jun. 12, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,159; 21 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2014 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,855; Response filed on May 11, 2015; 19 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 29, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,855; 19 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; Response filed on Jul. 22, 2015; 4 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 3, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,524; 8 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 8, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,159; 14 Pages. |