The invention relates generally to methods and systems for processing and displaying images of a patient's body for diagnostic purposes. In particular, the invention is a method for processing and displaying images of a patient's colon.
Colonography, the use of electronic imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT) to generate images of a patient's colon for purposes of colorectal cancer screening, is generally known. By way of example, these technologies are disclosed in the Johnson et al. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,928,314 and 7,035,681, the Zalis U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,784, the Vining U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,909,913 and 7,149,564, and PCT publication no. WO 2007/030132, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, this methodology involves obtaining a series of CT images of adjacent portions or slices of the colon. A radiologist then studies each of the images to identify any pre-cancerous polyps. Alternatively, a computer can effectively create a simulated intraluminal flight through the colon (this is also known as virtual colonoscopy). Colonography has been demonstrated to be a highly efficacious approach for detecting colorectal polyps.
When viewing CT images on a computer screen, the images typically have an intrinsic “dynamic range” of 4096 distinct gray levels (that is, one of 4096 different intensity values can be recorded at every pixel). However, a conventional computer monitor can typically only display 256 distinct gray levels. There are thus many possible ways to convert the measured data for viewing. For example, one can display the 256 lowest gray levels, with everything above this being displayed as pure white; one could display the brightest 256 levels, with everything darker than this being displayed as pure black; or one could evenly apportion the 4096 possible levels among the 256 available levels by dividing by 16, giving the most faithful overall rendition but losing much of the possible discriminating ability present in the data. In practice, different such mappings (known as window/level settings) are used for different purposes. For example, for optimal viewing of the lung, which is very dark, discrimination in bright parts of the image is of limited value. Thus, all bright pixels can be set to white and the available gray levels reserved for use in the appropriate brightness range. Radiologists have defined many such window/level settings that are known and in standard use to highlight different parts of the anatomy.
In a 2D axial review, radiologists often scan the colon data twice on a computer screen. The colon can first be viewed with a “lung” window/level setting that clearly shows protrusions into the lumen that are indicative of polyps. When such a protrusion is found, the reader may switch to a “tissue” window to determine if the object consists of soft tissue or fat. A second pass can be made in the reverse direction at the “tissue” window/level setting to look for areas of wall thickening that are indicative of flat lesions.
The invention is an improved method and system for processing and displaying images of a patient's body structures that enhances diagnostic speed and accuracy. One embodiment of the invention includes identifying first intensity pixels within a first intensity value range, identifying first distance pixels within a second intensity value range different than the first intensity value range and within a first distance from a first intensity pixel, and identifying second distance pixels within the second intensity value range and greater that the first distance from a first intensity pixel. The first distance pixels are processed with a first window/level setting. The second distance pixels are processed with a second window/level setting that is different than the first window/level setting. In another embodiment of the invention, pixels between the first and second distances from a first intensity pixel are processed with transition window/level settings varying between the first and second window/level settings as a function of the distance between the first and second distances.
The simultaneous dual window/level display of the colon in accordance with the invention is a viewing technique that displays 2D or other images with first (e.g., lung) window/level settings in certain portions of the image, and second (e.g., tissue) window/level settings in the other portions. Specifically, pixels within a given distance (d1) of air are displayed using a lung window, while pixels farther than a given distance (d2) from air are displayed using a tissue window. A smooth transition can be generated for intermediate pixels using a linear blend of the lung and tissue window/level settings.
The dual window/level technique can allow the reader to view the data in a single pass, which can reduce reading time. The lung window/level portions of the image would allow the reader to easily locate objects that protrude into the colon, while the tissue window/level portions would allow the reader to find regions of wall thickening. Since the interior of any protrusions can be displayed at a tissue window/level, there also may not be a need to switch settings to determine if such an object consists of soft tissue or fat.
The values of d1 and d2 can be set appropriately. The value d1 should typically be large enough so that the protrusion can be seen in the image, yet small enough so that it does not mask the interior of the protrusion. Similarly, the value d2 can be sufficiently large to allow a smooth transition from the lung window, yet small enough so that the interior of the protrusion can be seen with the tissue window. Optimal d1 and d2 values can be determined empirically. These values may vary under different conditions, or can be adjustable by the individual user (e.g., through a GUI).
As an example,
Although the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/881,231, filed on Jan. 19, 2007 and entitled Simultaneous Dual Window/Level Settings For Display Of CT Colonography Images, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
This invention was made with government support under Government Contract No. CA075333 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/051699 | 1/22/2008 | WO | 00 | 1/5/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/089489 | 7/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5891030 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5913820 | Bladen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6374134 | Bladen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6516212 | Bladen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522907 | Bladen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6757557 | Bladen et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785410 | Vining et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6909913 | Vining | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6928314 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947784 | Zalis | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7035681 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7149564 | Vining et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174202 | Bladen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20060018549 | Liang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047227 | Jerebko | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060270928 | Geiger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070003131 | Kaufman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070127790 | Lau et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167722 | Bladen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007030132 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2008089483 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008089489 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008089490 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008089492 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Carston, Michael J. et al., “CT Colonography of the Unprepared Colon: An Evaluation of Electronic Stool Subtraction”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5746, pp. 424-431, 2005. |
Cotton, Peter B. et al., “Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): A Multicenter Comparison With Standard Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia”, JAMA, Apr. 14, 2004, vol. 291, No. 14, pp. 1713-1719. |
Gatto, Nicolle M. et al., “Risk of Perforation After Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy: A Population-Based Study”, Journal of the national Cancer institute, vol. 95, No. 3, Feb. 5, 2003, pp. 230-236. |
Iannaccone, Riccardo et al., “Computed Tomographic Colonography Without Cathartic Preparation for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps”, Gastroenterology, vol. 127, pp. 1300-1311, 2004. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051676, mailed Aug. 1, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051699, mailed Jul. 11, 2008, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051703, mailed Jul. 14, 2008, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/051710, mailed Jul. 30, 2008, 12 pages. |
Jemal, Ahmedin et al., “Cancer Statistics 2003”, CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53:5-26. |
Johnson, C. Daniel et al., “Prospective Blinded Evaluation of Computed Tomographic Colonography for Screen Detection of Colorectal Polyps”, Gastroenterology 2003; 125:311-319. |
Lakare, Sarang et al., “Electronic Colon Cleansing Using Segmentation Rays for Virtual Colonoscopy”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 4683 pp. 412-418, 2002. |
Lakare, Sarang et al., “Robust Colon Residue Detection Using Vector Quantization Based Classification for Virtual Colonoscopy”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5031, pp. 515-520, 2003. |
Lieberman, David A. et al., “Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal Cancer”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, Jul. 20, 2000, No. 3, pp. 162-169. |
Pickhardt, Perry J. et al., “Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults”, The New England Journal of medicine, Dec. 4, 2003, vol. 349, No. 23, pp. 2191-2200. |
Ristvedt, Stephen L. et al., “Patient Preferences for CT Colonography, Conventional Colonoscopy, and Bowel Preparation”, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 98, No. 3, 2003, pp. 579-585. |
Seeff, Laura C. et al., “Are We Doing Enough to Screen for Colorectal Cancer? Findings From the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System”, The Journal of Family Practice, vol. 51, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 761-766. |
Serlie, Iwo et al., “A Probabilistic Method for Virtual Colonoscopy Cleansing”, SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5031, pp. 405-412, 2003. |
Serlie, Iwo et al., “Computed Cleansing for Virtual Colonoscopy Using a Three-Material Transition Model”, R.E. Ellis and T.M. Peters (Eds.): MICCAI 2003, LNCS 8979, pp. 175-183, 2003, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003. |
Weitzman, Elissa R. et al., “Risk and Reluctance: Understanding Impediments to Colorectal Cancer Screening”, Preventive Medicine 32, 502-513 (2001. |
Winawer, Sidney J. et al., “Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, No. 27, Dec. 30, 1993, pp. 1978-1981. |
Zalis, Michael E. et al., “Digital Subtraction Bowel Cleansing for CT Colonography using Morphological and Linear Filtration Methods”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. vol. 23, pp. 1335-1343, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120008841 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60881231 | Jan 2007 | US |