Patent Grant
7187340
1. Statement of the Technical Field
The invention concerns antenna systems, and more particularly ring focus antennas configured for concurrent multi-band operation.
2. Description of the Related Art
In recent years, there has arisen an increasing demand for microwave satellite communication antennas that have the ability to concurrently operate on multiple frequency bands. In those situations where a single coaxial feed for multiple bands is desired, it can be challenging to maintain existing system performance specifications.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,211,834 B1 to Durham et al. (hereinafter Durham), concerns a multi-band shaped ring focus antenna. In Durham, a pair of interchangeable, diversely shaped, close proximity-coupled sub-reflector-feed pairs are used for operation at respectively different spectral frequency bands. Swapping out the subreflector/feed pairs changes the operational band of the antenna. Accordingly, that system does not offer concurrent operation on spectrally offset frequency bands.
One approach to providing multi-band operation for a ring-focus antenna involves the use of coaxial antenna feeds. These types of feeds typically involve the placement of a first waveguide feed coaxially within a second waveguide feed. The second waveguide feed in some instances is a corrugated horn with a profiled taper. A corrugated horn antenna typically includes circumferential slots, or corrugations, along the interior walls of the antenna. Another advantage of the corrugated horn antenna is that it typically can be operated over a larger bandwidth as compared to a horn antenna having smooth walls. Still, these types of coaxial feeds using profiled horns are not suitable for all band combinations.
A second type of multi-band ring-focus feed is a hybrid horn system. These types of feeds also make use of a first horn positioned coaxially within a second horn. One unique feature of the hybrid horn feed system relates to the distinct way in which each of the first and second coaxial horns interact with a sub-reflector of the ring-focus antenna. In particular, the relative spacing between the outer coaxial horn and the sub-reflector can be selected to be less than about 1 wavelength. Positioned in this way, the sub-reflector is in the near field of the outer horn. The outer coaxial horn and the sub-reflector are said to operate in a coupled configuration. Conversely, the relative spacing between the inner coaxial horn and the sub-reflector can be more than about 8 wavelengths so that the sub-reflector is positioned in the far field relative to the inner horn. Accordingly, the inner coaxial horn and the sub-reflector are said to operate in a de-coupled configuration. These hybrid horn feeds for multi-band operation have been successful for some, but not all, band combinations.
Yet another solution that has been proposed for providing a multi-band ring-focus antenna involves the use of antennas that have co-located sub-reflectors or co-located main-reflectors. These designs have proven especially useful where it is desirable to utilize either an existing main reflector or where design requirements involve particularly complex frequency plans. However, designs for co-located sub-reflectors or co-located main reflectors usually involve frequency selective surfaces (FSS) and light weight materials. Accordingly, these types of systems can be relatively expensive to manufacture.
The invention concerns a compact multi-band antenna system that includes a main reflector having a shaped surface of revolution about a boresight axis of the antenna operable at a plurality of frequency bands spectrally offset from each other. For example, the shaped surface of revolution defining the main reflector and/or the subreflector can be shaped as a nonlinear surface of revolution. A multi band feed system is provided for the main reflector that includes a subreflector formed as a shaped surface of revolution about the boresight axis of the antenna, and a horn antenna. The horn antenna has one or more ridges disposed in a throat region of the horn antenna extending in a direction aligned with the boresight axis of the antenna. For example, a second ridge can be provided aligned with the boresight axis and opposed from the first ridge. Alternatively, the throat region of the horn antenna can include four of the ridges arranged around the boresight axis at equally spaced angular intervals.
The horn antenna described herein can be installed at a first location separated by a gap from a vertex of the subreflector on the boresight axis of the antenna. The gap can be advantageously selected to be less than four wavelengths at each of the spectrally offset frequency bands so that it operates in a coupled configuration with the subreflector. More particularly, the aperture of the horn antenna can be coupled to the shaped surface of revolution defining the subreflector. Consequently, the multiband feed system can define a focal ring for illuminating the main reflector at each of the plurality of frequency bands.
In an alternative embodiment, the invention can also include a method for feeding a ring focus antenna on two or more spectrally offset frequency bands. The method can include forming a first focal ring for a main reflector at a first frequency within a first one of the frequency bands using a horn antenna coupled to a subreflector of the ring focus antenna. The method can also include forming a second focal ring for the main reflector at a second frequency within a second one of the frequency bands using the horn antenna and the subreflector. Finally, the method can also include extending a bandwidth of the horn antenna by including at least a first ridge disposed in a throat region of the horn antenna extending in a direction aligned with the boresight axis of the antenna. For example, the horn antenna can be chosen to include four of the ridges disposed on a wall of the throat at equally spaced angular intervals about the boresight axis, and aligned with said boresight axis. According to one aspect, the invention can further include selecting at least one of the subreflector and the main reflector to be a shaped nonlinear surface of revolution about the boresight axis. Further, the horn antenna can be selected to have a circular polarization.
Ring focus antenna architectures commonly make use of a dual reflector system as shown in
Typical Cassegrain and Gregorian type reflector systems commonly use feed horns and sub-reflectors arranged in accordance with a decoupled configuration. These are sometimes referred to as decoupled feed/subreflector antennas. In a decoupled feed/subreflector antenna, the RF feed 100 is located in the far field of the sub-reflector 102. For example, the aperture 106 of the RF feed 100 can be positioned spaced from a vertex 108 of the sub-reflector 102 by a distance at the frequency of interest, where s1 is greater than or equal to about four wavelengths. Since the RF feed is in the far-field, the decoupled feed/subreflector configuration lends itself to optical design techniques such as ray tracing, geometrical theory of diffraction (GTD) and so on.
A second known type of ring focus antenna system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,831,613 to Gothard, et al. and illustrated in
In a back-fire feed configuration, the RF feed 200 and the sub-reflector 202 in combination can be considered as forming a single integrated feed network. This single feed network is particularly noteworthy as it provides a circular to radial waveguide transition that generates a prime-ring-focus type feed for the main reflector 204. In this regard, the back-fire feed can be thought of as being similar to a prime-focus parabolic feed. Further, the sub-reflector 202 in this feed configuration is not truly operating as a reflector in the conventional sense but rather as a splash-plate directly interacting with the feed aperture 206.
The ring focus antenna in
Referring now to
An aperture 306 of the RF feed horn 302 and the vertex 308 of the sub-reflector 304 can be spaced apart by a distance that is less than about 4 wavelengths. For example, the spacing can be less than about 2 wavelengths at an operating frequency of interest. In any case, the RF feed 302 and the sub-reflector 304 are coupled in the near-field to generate what is commonly known as a “back-fire” feed.
The RF feed horn 302 preferably has a circular cross-section as shown in
One or more elongated ridges 312 can be disposed within at least a waveguide portion of the horn antenna. For example, a set of four ridges 312 can be disposed in a throat region 314 of the horn antenna 302. These four ridges can extend along a length of the horn, toward the aperture 306, in a direction generally aligned with the boresight axis 310. The ridges 312 can be positioned on an inner surface of wall 316 at equally spaced angular intervals around the boresight axis 310. For example, the ridges can be located at 0, 90, 180, and 270 degree angular orientations as shown in
The bandwidth of the throat region of a horn antenna is generally the difference between the cutoff frequency of the dominant mode of the waveguide (TE11 for a circular waveguide as shown in
More particularly, ridges 312 can form a parallel plate waveguide within the cylindrical waveguide. The parallel plate waveguide propagates a TEM mode. As the gaps b1 and b2 between the ridges is narrowed, the cutoff frequency of the TE11 mode decreases towards zero frequency. The performance of ridge loaded waveguides can be predicted using basic RF transmission line techniques. Using these techniques, the dimensions of the ridges can be calculated to provide desired characteristic impedance and return loss over selected frequency bands of interest. In general, however, the widest bandwidth for the horn 302 will be achieved when the spacings b1 and b2 are small relative to the diameter of the cylindrical waveguide forming throat 314.
Referring once again to
Finally, it may be observed in
In order to facilitate the use of sub-reflector 304 and main reflector 502 concurrently on the two or more separate frequency bands, each is advantageously shaped so as to have no continuous surface portion thereof shaped as a regular conical surface of revolution. Consequently, the precise shape of the main reflector 502 and the sub-reflector 304 can be determined based upon computer analysis.
More particularly, a computer program can be used to determine suitable shapes for the sub-reflector 304 and the main reflector 502. This process generates a numerically defined dual reflector system as shown and described relative to
The main reflector 502 and the sub-reflector 304 are typically shaped non-linear surfaces of revolution. In general, the shape of the main reflector and the sub-reflector in
The term ‘shaped’ as used herein refers to a subreflector and main reflector geometry that is defined in accordance with a prescribed set of (reduced sidelobe envelope) directivity pattern relationships and boundary conditions for a prescribed set of equations, rather than a shape that is definable by an equation for a regular conic, such as a parabola or an ellipse. Boundary conditions can include main reflector and sub-reflector diameters and the feed phase center. Given prescribed feed inputs to and boundary conditions for the antenna, the shape of each of a subreflector and a main reflector are generated by executing a computer program that solves a prescribed set of equations for the predefined constraints. In a preferred embodiment, the equations are those which: 1—achieve conservation of energy across the antenna aperture, 2—provide equal phase across the antenna aperture, and 3—obey Snell's law. Details of the foregoing process are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,211,834 to Durham et al, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
While the boundary conditions may be selected to define a regular conical shape, such is not the intent of the shaping of the invention. The ultimate shape of the subreflector and the main reflector are whatever the parameters of the operational specification of the antenna dictate, when applied to the directivity pattern relationships and boundary conditions.
Once the shapes of a subreflector and main reflector pair have been generated, the performance of the antenna can be subjected to computer analysis, to determine whether the generated antenna shapes will produce a desired directivity characteristic. If the design performance criteria are not initially satisfied, one or more of the parameter constraints can be adjusted, and performance of the antenna can be analyzed for the new set of shapes. This process can be repeated iteratively, until the shaped pair meets the antenna's intended operational performance specification.
For example, by utilizing the foregoing techniques, it is possible to obtain the geometry illustrated in
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be clear that the invention is not so limited. Numerous modifications, changes, variations, substitutions and equivalents will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as described in the claims. For example, it should be noted that while the antennas described herein have for convenience been largely described relative to a transmitting mode of operation, the invention is not intended to be so limited. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the antennas can be used for receiving as well as transmitting.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3714652 | Grabowski et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 4644362 | Rammos | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4811028 | Bryanos | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4829314 | Barbier et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4878061 | Nusair et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 5471664 | Kim | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5552797 | Cook | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5580387 | Chen | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5737698 | Gabrelian et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5973654 | Lusignan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6111547 | Gau et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6211834 | Durham et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6271799 | Rief et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6489931 | Liu | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6603438 | Strickland | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6624792 | Chu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6697028 | Gothard et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6831613 | Gothard et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 20030210197 | Cencich et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060082513 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
