Patent Grant
11697216
The contents of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/060,410, filed Oct. 6, 2014 and entitled “SHAVING BLADE AND RAZOR APPARATUS,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/135,592, filed Mar. 19, 2015 and entitled “SHAVING BLADE AND RAZOR APPARATUS,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/174,067, filed Jun. 11, 2015 and entitled “SHAVING BLADE AND RAZOR APPARATUS,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/875,484, filed Oct. 5, 2015 and entitled “RAZOR APPARATUS AND SHAVING SYSTEM” are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Embodiments described herein relate to the field of shaving tools, and more particularly, to a single-blade razor and methods of manufacturing the same.
Since the latter part of the 20th century, the market for shaving tools has been dominated by the trend of including an ever-larger number of low-quality blades in a disposable cartridge. For example, whereas a two-blade cartridge was once considered revolutionary, currently five- and six-blade cartridges command increasing market share.
Evidence that such multi-blade cartridges actually improve shaving performance is scant, however. In fact, the present inventors have recognized a well-designed razor using a single, high quality blade can provide a shaving experience that is superior to that of multi-blade cartridges. These inventors' continuing research into the design of single-blade shaving systems has yielded additional discoveries that may further improve the quality of the single-blade shaving experience and the durability of the single-blade razor itself.
Various embodiments of a razor apparatus and methods for manufacturing the same are disclosed. In an embodiment, a razor apparatus may include a handle and a head pivotably mounted on the handle. The head may include a rear side including an aperture for receiving a single blade, as well as a front side through which a cutting edge of the single blade is exposed during use. The head may further include an upper portion and a lower portion that form the aperture. The lower portion may physically interface with the upper portion so that a front region of the upper portion is physically supported by the lower portion.
In a particular implementation of the razor apparatus, to physically interface with the upper portion, the lower portion may include several protruding latches located in the area proximate the front side of the head. The protruding latches may respectively mate with a number of recesses formed in the upper portion. Alternatively, the latches may be formed in the upper portion and may respectively mate with recesses formed in the lower portion.
An embodiment of a method of manufacturing a razor apparatus may include fabricating a lower portion and an upper portion of a head of the razor apparatus, where the lower portion and the upper portion are fabricated to physically interface with each other, when assembled, at a front region and a rear region of the head. The method may further include assembling the lower portion and the upper portion of the head. When assembled, the lower and upper portions of the head may engage so that at the front region of the head, the upper portion is physically supported by the lower portion. Upon assembly, the lower and upper portions of the head may form an aperture for receiving a single blade. In a particular implementation, the fabricating may be performed using a metal injection molding process.
In another embodiment, a razor apparatus may include a handle and a head pivotably mounted on the handle, where the head may include an aperture for receiving a single blade. The head may further include a means for retaining the single blade, where the means for retaining the single blade is configured to retain the single blade during use while permitting the single blade to move in two or more dimensions within the means for retaining the single blade during use.
In a particular implementation, the means for retaining the single blade may include a number of retaining posts, each configured to mate with a respective recess in the single blade to retain the single blade within the head. In a further implementation, the retaining posts may be spaced to retain the single blade during use while permitting the single blade to move in at least two dimensions during use.
In another embodiment, a method of manufacturing a razor apparatus may include fabricating a lower portion and an upper portion of a head, where the lower portion includes a number of retaining posts. The method may further include assembling the lower portion and the upper portion of the head. When assembled, the lower and upper portions of the head may form an aperture for receiving a single blade. Each of the retaining posts may be configured to mate with a respective recess in the single blade to retain the single blade within the head upon insertion of the single blade. Further, the retaining posts may be spaced to retain the single blade during use while permitting the single blade to move in at least two dimensions during use. In a particular implementation, the fabricating may be performed using a metal injection molding process.
The above and further advantages of the methods and mechanisms may be better understood by referring to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the methods and mechanisms presented herein. However, one having ordinary skill in the art should recognize that the various embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known structures, components, signals, computer program instructions, and techniques have not been shown in detail to avoid obscuring the approaches described here. It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements.
This specification includes references to “an embodiment.” The appearance of the phrase “in an embodiment” in different contexts does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. Particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner consistent with this disclosure. Furthermore, as used throughout this application, the word “may” is used in a permissive sense (i.e., meaning “having the potential to”), rather than the mandatory sense (i.e., meaning “must”). Similarly, the words “include,” “including,” and “includes” mean including, but not limited to.
Terminology. The following paragraphs provide definitions and/or context for terms found in this disclosure (including the appended claims):
“Comprising.” This term is open-ended. As used in the appended claims, this term does not foreclose additional structure or steps. Consider a claim that recites: “A system comprising a processor . . . .” Such a claim does not foreclose the system from including additional components (e.g., a display, a memory controller).
“Configured To.” Within this disclosure, different entities (which may variously be referred to as “units,” “circuits,” other components, etc.) may be described or claimed as “configured” to perform one or more tasks or operations. This formulation—[entity] configured to [perform one or more tasks]—is used herein to refer to structure (i.e., something physical, such as an electronic circuit or mechanical apparatus). More specifically, this formulation is used to indicate that this structure is arranged to perform the one or more tasks during operation. A structure can be said to be “configured to” perform some task even if the structure is not currently being operated. A “temperature circuit configured to measure an internal operating temperature of a processing element” is intended to cover, for example, an integrated circuit that has circuitry that performs this function during operation, even if the integrated circuit in question is not currently being used (e.g., a power supply is not connected to it). Thus, an entity described or recited as “configured to” perform some task refers to something physical, such as a device, circuit, memory storing program instructions executable to implement the task, etc. This phrase is not used herein to refer to something intangible. Thus the “configured to” construct is not used herein to refer to a software construct such as an application programming interface (API).
“Based On.” As used herein, this term is used to describe one or more factors that affect a determination. This term does not foreclose additional factors that may affect a determination. That is, a determination may be solely based on those factors or based, at least in part, on those factors. Consider the phrase “determine A based on B.” While B may be a factor that affects the determination of A, such a phrase does not foreclose the determination of A from also being based on C. In other instances, A may be determined based solely on B. “Dependent on” may be employed as a synonym for “based on.”
“In Response To.” As used herein, this term is used to describe causality of events or conditions. For example, in the phrase “B occurs in response to A,” there is a cause-and-effect relationship in which A causes B to occur. It is noted that this phrase does not entail that A is the only event that causes B to occur; B may also occur in response to other events or conditions that may be independent of or dependent on A. Moreover, this phrase does not foreclose the possibility that other events or conditions may also be required to cause B to occur. For example, in some instances, A alone may be sufficient to cause B to happen, whereas in other instances, A may be a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one (such as in the case that “B occurs in response to A and C”).
“Each.” With respect to a plurality or set of elements, the term “each” may be used to ascribe some characteristic to all the members of that plurality or set. But absent language to the contrary, use of “each” does not foreclose the possibility that other instances of the element might not include the characteristic. For example, in the phrase “a plurality of widgets, each of which exhibits property A,” there must be at least two (and possibly arbitrarily many) widgets that exhibit property A. But without more, this does not foreclose the possibility of an additional widget, not a member of the plurality, that does not exhibit property A. In other words, absent language to the contrary, the term “each” does not refer to every possible instance of an element, but rather every element in a particular plurality or set.
Overview of Razor Apparatus and Head Support Structures
Turning now to
In an embodiment, blade 200 may have a length (denoted d1) of about 38.4 mm, and a width (denoted d2) of about 18.4 mm. All measurements stated herein are subject to ordinary manufacturing tolerances for the process used to manufacture the item in question. For example, a sampling of a particular model of blades 200 yielded d1 in the range of 38.396 mm-38.437 mm, and d2 in the range of 18.360 mm-18.397 mm. Additionally, blade 200 may include a number of recesses 215 which, as will be described below, may mate with retaining posts of head 104 in order to retain blade 200 within head 104 during use. In the illustrated embodiment, recesses 215 are approximately semicircular in shape, and may measure about 4.0 mm (e.g., 3.985 mm-3.998 mm) along dimension d3 and about 1.84 mm (e.g., 1.831 mm-1.842 mm) along dimension d4. Recesses 215 may be located about 1.85 mm from the rear edge of blade 200 along dimension d5 (e.g., 1.827 mm-1.873 mm).
It is noted that in other embodiments of blade 200 and razor apparatus 100, these dimensions may vary. In particular, recesses 215 may assume shapes other than semicircular. Additionally, different embodiments of blade 200 may employ similar shapes and dimensions for recesses 215, but may vary the location of recesses 215 within blade 200 (e.g., by varying dimension d5). The relative positioning of recesses 215 may affect the relative degree of exposure of cutting edge 210 upon insertion of blade 200, which may in turn alter the shaving characteristics of razor apparatus 100.
In one design approach, the front region of upper portion 130 (i.e., the part of upper portion 130 that faces front side 115 of head 104) may effectively “float” over lower portion 120. That is, although the rear region of upper portion 130 may be attached to lower portion 120, the front region may extend over lower portion 120 without making physical contact with lower portion 120. In this approach, upper portion 130 may retain blade 200 from above, but there may be a gap between upper portion 130 and lower portion 120. Depending on the materials used to construct head 104, such a gap may affect the structural integrity of head 104. For example, without physical support, the front region of upper portion 130 may bend or break on impact, such as if razor apparatus 100 is dropped.
By contrast, in the embodiment of
Further details regarding latch 145 and other elements of head 104 are shown in
As shown in
When the rear regions of lower portion 120 and upper portion 130 are secured at mounting points 160, the engagement of latches 145 with their corresponding recesses 155 may enable the front region of upper portion 130 to be securely attached to and physically supported by lower portion 120 through frictional engagement alone (e.g., without need for adhesives), although the attachment may be further enhanced with adhesives or welding if desired.
Latches 145 may be considered a means for physically supporting upper portion 130. However, it is noted that latches 145 need not be formed in lower portion 120. In an alternative embodiment, the orientation of latches 145 and recesses 155 may be reversed, such that latches 145 are formed within upper portion 130 and recesses 155 are formed within lower portion 120. This may (but need not) include relocating side walls 135 to lower portion 120. It is also noted that many equivalents to latches 145 exist. For example, recesses 155 may correspond to grooves within side walls 135 rather than notches, and latches 145 may correspondingly be relocated within side walls 150 to mate with such grooves. Generally speaking, latches 145 may encompass any type of protrusion in one portion of head 104 that is specifically formed to mate with a corresponding recess in the other portion of head 104 in order to physically support a front region of upper portion 130.
Blade Movement Properties and Shaving Characteristics
The shaving performance of a single blade razor such as razor apparatus 100 may be characterized as a function of several mechanical parameters. One such characterization is schematically illustrated in
Empirical measurements conducted using embodiments of razor apparatus 100 suggest that some combinations of the foregoing parameters may yield superior shaving performance (e.g., in terms of shave closeness, effort, comfort, and/or other characteristics) relative to others. One such combination includes a blade angle 802 of 31.3 degrees, a blade gap 806 of 0.65 mm, and a blade exposure 808 of 0.15 mm, although other combinations are possible and contemplated.
It is noted, however, that skin surface 800 is rarely uniform. Its topography may vary according to factors such as anatomical features and local skin imperfections (e.g., moles, blemishes, scars, warts, and the like). Accordingly, a configuration in which the parameters described above are statically maintained—e.g., by rigidly maintaining the position of blade 200 within head 104—may not perform as well as a configuration in which blade 200 is permitted at least a small degree of movement in various dimensions within head 104 during use.
The properties of the illustrated embodiment of lower portion 120 that give rise to blade movement may be primarily determined by the spacing and dimensions of retaining posts 180. In the illustrated embodiment, lower portion 120 itself may have a width (denoted d6) of 20.5 mm with a manufacturing tolerance of +/−0.15 mm (represented as 20.5+/−0.15 mm), and a length (denoted d7) of 44.7+/−0.15 mm. Retaining posts 180 may have a dimension d8 of 2.0+/−0.05 mm and a dimension d9 of 3.95+/−0.05 mm. The spacing between retaining posts 180 (denoted d10) may be 35.0+/−0.15 mm.
It is noted that the foregoing dimensions and tolerances are merely examples and that other configurations are possible and contemplated. For example, various ones of the foregoing dimensions may be altered in order to adjust the blade movement characteristics discussed below. Further, the specified manufacturing tolerances may differ for different manufacturing processes. Additionally, it is noted that the number and shape of retaining posts 180 may vary in different embodiments. It is not strictly necessary that the general shape of retaining posts 180 match that of recesses 215. That is, it may be possible to achieve the results described here with a shape of retaining posts 180 that provides fewer points of contact between retaining posts 180 and recesses 215 than the semicircular shape shown.
As can be seen by comparing the dimensions and spacing of retaining posts 180 with the corresponding dimensions of blade 200 discussed above, retaining posts 180 are slightly smaller in diameter than recesses 215 of blade 200 (e.g., d9 of about 3.95 mm for retaining posts 180 versus d3 of about 4.0 mm for recesses 215). Additionally, the effective spacing between recesses 215 is about 34.7 mm (e.g., d1 of about 38.4 mm-2*d3 of about 1.84 mm), whereas the spacing of retaining posts 180 is slightly wider (e.g., d10 of about 35.0 mm).
Accordingly, the relative dimensions and spacing of retaining posts 180 in conjunction with recesses 215 of blade 200 may permit movement of blade 200 in multiple (e.g., at least two) dimensions during use. These additional degrees of movement may enable the position of blade 200 to more readily adapt to non-uniformities in skin surface 800 than a rigidly retained blade, which may in turn improve shaving performance. Through empirical testing of some embodiments of razor apparatus 100, improved performance may result when blade 200 is permitted to move along a dimension parallel to cutting edge 210 of blade 200 (e.g., dimension d1 of
As noted above, blade 200 may tend to pivot around the support points presented by lower support elements 190 and upper support elements 195. That is, in addition to movement within the plane of blade 200, blade 200 may also move in a direction perpendicular to this plane (e.g., perpendicular to face 250). For example, cutting edge 210 may be permitted to move along a dimension perpendicular to face 250 by 0.15-0.375 mm, with a possible optimum value within this range of 0.25 mm. Likewise, rear edge 220 may be permitted to move along a dimension perpendicular to face 250 by 0.45-1.0 mm, with a possible optimum value within this range of 0.85 mm.
It is noted that the foregoing ranges are merely examples, and that other suitable ranges may be determined for different configurations of blade 200 and head 104.
Materials and Fabrication
Generally speaking, the components of razor apparatus 100 may be manufactured according to any suitable method from any suitable material. In some embodiments, various elements of razor apparatus 100 (e.g., lower portion 120 and upper portion 130, but possibly including all elements) may be fabricated using a metal injection molding (MIM) process. In MIM, a powdered metal feedstock containing a binder may be injected into a mold in a manner similar to plastic injection molding (and possibly using the same equipment). Once the binder solidifies, the resulting “green” part may be further processed in one or more steps to remove the binder and densify the metal particles, often involving sintering the part in a high-heat environment (possibly high enough to partially melt the metal).
The finished MIM product may undergo other types of metal processing, such as plating, hardening, annealing, etc., similar to metalwork produced via machining, casting, forging or other conventional processes, and the resulting part may possess similar physical characteristics to parts produced using such conventional processes. Some machining steps may be necessary or desired before final assembly. (A typical manufacturing tolerance for a MIM may be +/−0.5% of the length in any direction, although tighter tolerances may be achieved through process refinements or post-MIM processing steps such as machining.) However, the MIM process may enable much faster manufacturing of complex metal parts than if such parts were machined from solid metal. That said, the components of razor apparatus 100 may also be fabricated using machining from a solid metal workpiece, liquid metal casting, or any other suitable technique.
If MIM is chosen, any suitable feedstock may be employed. A stainless steel powder feedstock may be preferable, given that razor apparatus 100 would routinely be exposed to moisture during use. One possible feedstock choice would be 316L stainless steel, which may have a post-sintering composition by weight of: ≤0.03% carbon, 16.0-18.0% chromium, 10.0-14.0% nickel, 2.0-3.0% molybdenum, <2.0% manganese, <1.0% silicon, balance iron.
Alternatively, a substantially nickel-free stainless steel powder feedstock may be employed. One example of such a feedstock is BASF™ Catamold™ PANACEA, which may have a post-sintering composition by weight of: ≤0.2% carbon, 0.75-0.90% nitrogen, 16.5-17.5% chromium, ≤0.1% nickel, 3.0-3.5% molybdenum, 10.0-12.0% manganese, ≤1.0% silicon, balance iron. The use of PANACEA, heretofore unknown to the inventors in the context of manufacturing a razor apparatus, may present several advantages over other types of stainless steel. For example, PANACEA may provide increased resistance to bending or breakage upon impact (e.g., in the event that razor apparatus 100 is dropped). Moreover, given that head 104 is designed for extensive skin contact, the substantially nickel-free composition of PANACEA may be beneficial for those with nickel allergies. It is noted that in some embodiments, the components of head 104 may be fabricated using one type of material, whereas other components of razor apparatus 100 may be fabricated using a different material.
Operation continues in block 1402 with assembling the lower portion and the upper portion of the head. When assembled, the lower and upper portions of the head engage so that at the front region of the head, the upper portion is physically supported by the lower portion, and the lower and upper portions of the head form an aperture for receiving a single blade. For example, lower portion 120 and upper portion 130 may be assembled as shown in the preceding figures according to the discussion above.
Operation continues in block 1502 with assembling the lower portion and the upper portion of the head. When assembled, the lower and upper portions of the head form an aperture for receiving a single blade. Moreover, each of the retaining posts is configured to mate with a respective recess in the single blade to retain the single blade within the head upon insertion of the single blade. Further, the retaining posts are spaced to retain the single blade during use while permitting the single blade to move in at least two dimensions during use. For example, lower portion 120 and upper portion 130 may be assembled to permit a small degree of movement of blade 200 as discussed above with respect to
Although the discussion above has been presented with respect to a single instance of razor apparatus 100 in order to facilitate discussion, it is noted that any of the features described above—specifically including the use of latches 145 and the configuration of retaining posts 180—may be used together or separately.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments are only non-limiting examples of implementations. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/742,408, filed Jan. 14, 2020 (now U.S. Pat. No. 11,141,872), which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/333,398, filed Oct. 25, 2016 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,538,005); the disclosures of each of the above-referenced applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1053089 | Holm | Feb 1913 | A |
| 1057644 | Hiener | Apr 1913 | A |
| 1117953 | Crandall | Nov 1914 | A |
| 1169395 | Greist et al. | Jan 1916 | A |
| 1200426 | King | Oct 1916 | A |
| 1234834 | Warren | Jul 1917 | A |
| 1460139 | Parker | Jun 1923 | A |
| 1633139 | Staats-oels | Jun 1927 | A |
| 2018304 | Hayhurst | Oct 1935 | A |
| 2019957 | England | Nov 1935 | A |
| 2030833 | Thompson | Feb 1936 | A |
| 2077241 | Karle | Apr 1937 | A |
| 2108758 | Thompson et al. | Feb 1938 | A |
| 2288302 | Reyburn et al. | Jun 1942 | A |
| 2386536 | Bensel | Oct 1945 | A |
| D143326 | Kempf | Dec 1945 | S |
| D146759 | Brown | May 1947 | S |
| 2545533 | Stewart | Mar 1951 | A |
| 2588211 | Crowell | Mar 1952 | A |
| 2744317 | Borden | May 1956 | A |
| 2780866 | Borden | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2794246 | Marsh et al. | Jun 1957 | A |
| 3015159 | Baun | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3045342 | Diehl | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3067512 | Randol | Dec 1962 | A |
| 3078569 | Sidney et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
| 3080651 | Cas | Mar 1963 | A |
| 3203093 | Kuhnl | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3488764 | Welsh | Jan 1970 | A |
| 3583262 | Mullen | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3605265 | Iten | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3775845 | Kuhnl | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3777396 | Simonetti | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3949470 | Hall | Apr 1976 | A |
| D241080 | Glaberson | Aug 1976 | S |
| D248878 | Halm | Aug 1978 | S |
| D249968 | Kiraly | Oct 1978 | S |
| D250130 | Douglas | Oct 1978 | S |
| D250547 | Palmer | Dec 1978 | S |
| 4152828 | Lund | May 1979 | A |
| D253726 | Schuman et al. | Dec 1979 | S |
| 4180907 | Iten | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4184246 | Trotta | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4198745 | Moehlenpah | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4200976 | Gooding | May 1980 | A |
| 4212103 | Schuman-Hoole | Jul 1980 | A |
| D259065 | Byrne | Apr 1981 | S |
| 4272886 | Asano | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4275498 | Ciaffone | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4337575 | Trotta | Jul 1982 | A |
| D268291 | Jones | Mar 1983 | S |
| 4392303 | Ciaffone | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4446619 | Jacobson | May 1984 | A |
| 4476630 | Byrne | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4574476 | Ortiz | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4617736 | McCrary | Oct 1986 | A |
| D293036 | Iten et al. | Dec 1987 | S |
| 4813131 | Gruner | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4833779 | Iten | May 1989 | A |
| 4852254 | Duncan | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4866844 | Burout, III | Sep 1989 | A |
| D304773 | Beuchat | Nov 1989 | S |
| 4879811 | Cooney | Nov 1989 | A |
| D310580 | King | Sep 1990 | S |
| 4970784 | Althaus et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5012578 | Siefer | May 1991 | A |
| 5048184 | Saxton | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5251376 | Althaus et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5251752 | Purohit | Oct 1993 | A |
| D345232 | Gray | Mar 1994 | S |
| D354586 | Grange | Jan 1995 | S |
| 5416974 | Wain | May 1995 | A |
| 5461781 | Pirc | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5526567 | Carson, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5526568 | Copelan | Jun 1996 | A |
| D375408 | Muller | Nov 1996 | S |
| 5687485 | Shurtleff et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5784790 | Carson, III et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5953824 | Ferraro et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| D427376 | Scott | Jun 2000 | S |
| 6141875 | Andrews | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6266888 | Zowaski | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| D446884 | Kohring et al. | Aug 2001 | S |
| 6418623 | Marcarelli | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6473971 | Ordaz | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6530151 | Kameka | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| D476772 | Wonderley | Jul 2003 | S |
| 6655029 | Saito | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6694626 | Kludjian et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| D500888 | Gray | Jan 2005 | S |
| D508586 | Shurtleff | Aug 2005 | S |
| D512795 | Carpenter | Dec 2005 | S |
| D513540 | Wonderley | Jan 2006 | S |
| 7028407 | Ehrlich et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7140115 | Greene | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7155828 | Guimont et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7197827 | Paquette | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| D541987 | Sugawara | May 2007 | S |
| D542468 | Stiles | May 2007 | S |
| D558396 | Sierra et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
| D560032 | Lopez | Jan 2008 | S |
| D587846 | Wonderley et al. | Mar 2009 | S |
| D599955 | Provost | Sep 2009 | S |
| D603560 | Micinilio | Nov 2009 | S |
| D612540 | Joslin | Mar 2010 | S |
| D619763 | Coresh | Jul 2010 | S |
| D621095 | Cataudella | Aug 2010 | S |
| D627929 | Haba | Nov 2010 | S |
| D635302 | Psimadas et al. | Mar 2011 | S |
| D636938 | White, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | S |
| 7975389 | Bozikis et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| D650527 | Andersen et al. | Dec 2011 | S |
| D667168 | Greene | Sep 2012 | S |
| 8273205 | Murgida | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| D703377 | Christie et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
| 8720072 | Bucco | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8739411 | Kinghom et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 9108329 | Stiles | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9393708 | Babaev | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| D763506 | Barrett | Aug 2016 | S |
| 20020066186 | White et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116822 | Coffin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20040181954 | Follo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050000100 | Coffin | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20070251106 | Gladstone | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20100205808 | King | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110016724 | Murgida | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20120096718 | Howell et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120096723 | Howell et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233868 | Bridges et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130047449 | Zakuskin | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130081291 | Wain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20140101947 | Samuels et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140116211 | Griffin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140230256 | Christie et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140331500 | Ren | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150183119 | Contaldi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20160288349 | Barrett et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101077425 | Nov 2007 | CN |
| 101353768 | Jan 2009 | CN |
| 203357477 | Dec 2013 | CN |
| 8034837 | Dec 1986 | DE |
| 2612112 | Sep 1988 | FR |
| 9529798 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/058696 dated Feb. 22, 2017, 7 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2016/058696 dated May 9, 2017, 16 pages. |
| Second Office Action in CN Appl. No. 201680090428.7 dated Feb. 7, 2021, 12 pages. |
| Examination Report in European Appl. No. 16788402.2 dated May 14, 2020, 4 pages. |
| Office Action in CN Appl. No. 201680090428.7 dated Jul. 10, 2020, 15 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220072724 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16742408 | Jan 2020 | US |
| Child | 17496618 | US | |
| Parent | 15333398 | Oct 2016 | US |
| Child | 16742408 | US |
