Single cantilever spring pedal feel emulator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6591710
  • Patent Number
    6,591,710
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 18, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 15, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A brake pedal assembly for a vehicle equipped with an electronic or “brake-by-wire” braking system includes a brake pedal feel emulator which mimics or emulates the pedal feel of a conventional hydraulic braking system. The brake pedal feel emulator includes a single cantilever spring which reacts against a shaped surface and is mounted such that the free end thereof applies a force to the brake pedal which varies as the point at which the spring diverges from the shaped surface changes in response to movement of the brake pedal. The free length of the spring is therefor varied as the pedal is depressed as a function of the shape of the shaped surface, so the force applied to the pedal may be designed to vary to emulate the feel of a conventional braking system.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates to a motor vehicle brake pedal for an electronic or “brake-by-wire” braking system which includes a brake pedal feel emulator which artificially mimics or emulates the pedal feel of a traditional hydraulic braking system.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Early motor vehicles were equipped with hydraulic braking systems in which a master cylinder was directly actuated by a brake pedal to operate the vehicle brakes. The force applied by the operator to the brake pedal was opposed by a force generated by the hydraulic force applied to the vehicle brakes. This force initially increased quite slowly because compliance in the hydraulic system and in the brakes had to be taken up and the force of return springs of drum brakes had to be overcome. After this initial phase, the force applied to the brake pedal is increased at an exponential rate. Vehicle operators are accustomed to this pedal “feel” characteristics of manual braking systems and expect all braking systems to react in the same way. For example, when power assisted brakes were introduced, the power booster had to incorporate the feel of the prior manual braking systems in order to be acceptable to vehicle operators.




More recently, electronic or “brake-by-wire” braking systems have been proposed. In such systems, braking is generated by an electro-hydraulic system in which the brake pedal generates an electrical signal which controls an electronic controller which controls the operation of a pump that applies the vehicle brakes, or the brakes include an electric motor which is controlled by the signal transmitted to the electronic controller by the brake pedal. Accordingly, these electronic braking systems must incorporate a pedal which provides “feel” to the vehicle operator that emulates the feel vehicle operators are accustomed to as described above. Prior art brake pedal feel emulators are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,729,979 and 5,603,217.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention, a single cantilever spring reacts against a shaped surface and is mounted such that the free end thereof applies a force to the brake pedal which varies as the point at which the spring diverges from the shaped surface changes in response to movement of the brake pedal. The free length of the spring is therefor varied as the pedal is depressed as a function of the shape of the shaped surface, so that the feedback force applied to the pedal may be designed to vary to emulate the feel of a conventional braking system.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a side elevational view, partly in section, of a brake pedal assembly incorporating a brake pedal feel emulator made pursuant to the teachings of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a front elevational view of the brake pedal assembly illustrated in

FIG. 1

;





FIGS. 3 and 4

are views similar to

FIGS. 1 and 2

respectively, but illustrating another embodiment of the invention; and





FIG. 5

is a view similar to

FIG. 1

, but illustrating still another embodiment of the invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring now to the drawings, a vehicle pedal assembly generally indicated by the numeral


10


includes a pedal arm


12


having a pad


14


on one end thereof and a pivot connection


16


at the other end thereof which pivotally mounts the pedal arm


12


to a motor vehicle. A cantilever spring


18


extends parallel to the pedal arm


12


and includes a fixed end


20


secured to the vehicle through a housing


22


which is also attached to the vehicle. The housing


22


supports the pedal arm


12


through the pivot connection


16


and a bracket


24


which carries a shaped surface


26


. The shaped surface


26


is shaped as will hereinafter be explained and extends parallel to the spring


18


such that the spring


18


progressively engages the shaped surface


26


as the pedal arm


12


is pivoted toward the shaped surface


26


. The cantilever spring


18


further includes a free end


28


, which pivotally engages one end of a link


30


, the other end of which is pivotally connected to the pedal arm


12


. The cantilever spring


18


urges the pedal arm


12


against an adjustable stop


32


mounted on the housing


22


.




Since the force transmitted through the link


30


is a function of the braking force generated by the vehicle operator, the link


30


may include a load cell


33


which generates an electrical signal which varies with accordance with the load transferred through the link


30


. This signal is transmitted to the aforementioned controller which controls the brake application. In addition to the signal from the load cell


33


, the controller may also be designed to respond to an electrical signal representing the position of the pedal arm


12


. Accordingly a Hall effect sensor


34


is mounted on the housing


22


, and a magnet


36


is mounted on the pedal arm


12


in a position such that it moves toward the magnet


36


when a brake application is effected. The Hall effect sensor


34


generates an electrical signal which varies as a function of the distance between the Hall effect sensor


34


and the magnet


36


, thereby generating an electrical signal which varies as a function of the position of the pedal arm


12


during a brake application. The electrical controller responds to both the signal from the Hall effect sensor


34


and the signal from the load cell


33


within the link


30


to sense spike brake applications, etc. and to modulate braking accordingly. The duel signals are also useful for redundancy so that a signal may be received by the controller in the event of the failure of one of the sensors or of one of the electrical lines connecting the sensors to the controller.




As is known to those skilled in the art, the force required to effect a given deflection of the cantilever spring


18


is a function of a free length


31


of the spring, a shorter free length


31


requiring a greater force and a longer free length


31


requiring a lesser force. The shaped surface


26


is a curvilinear surface shaped so that the engagement point of the spring


18


on the shaped surface


26


moves downwardly viewing

FIG. 1

from the upper end


26




a


of the shaped surface


26


adjacent the fixed end


20


of the spring


18


to the lower end


26




b


of the shaped surface


26


. The shaped surface


26


is shaped so that the free length


31


of the cantilevered spring


11


will vary, so that the force applied to the pedal arm


12


will also vary, in a manner that will provide the required “feel” or force feedback to the vehicle operator. Since the surface


26


is shaped to cause the spring


18


to generate feedback forces, the shaped surface


26


may not necessarily conform to the natural arc of the spring


18


as it is deflected, so that gaps may occur between the spring


18


and the shaped surface


26


.




It will also be noted that the radius of curvature of the shaped surface


26


is relatively large at the upper end


26




a


and thus his portion of the shaped surface


26


is relatively flat. The radius of curvature decreases to a minimum curvature at the lower end


26




b


. Accordingly, when the pedal arm


12


is initially moved away from the stop


32


, the point of contact between the spring


18


and the shaped surface


26


moves along the relatively flat portion of the shaped surface


26


adjacent the fixed end


20


of the spring


18


, and thus the point of contact between the spring


18


and the shaped surface


26


changes relatively little during initial movement of the pedal arm


12


away from the stop


32


, so that the free length


31


of the spring


18


also changes a relatively small amount. Accordingly, the feedback force transmitted to the vehicle operator will also increase at a relatively small rate indicative of the initial portion of a brake application. Additional movement of the pedal arm


12


causes the point of contact between the spring


18


and the shaped surface


26


to move along the more sharply curved portion of the shaped surface


26


, thereby decreasing the free length


31


of the spring


18


at a continually increasing (exponential) rate, thereby increasing the feedback force on the pedal arm


12


at a similar rate. Accordingly, the feedback force after the initial movement of the pedal arm


12


increases at an exponential rate, providing a feedback force or pedal “feel” that is similar to the feel to which vehicle operators have become accustomed.




Accordingly, the feedback force transmitted to the vehicle operator will also increase at a relatively small rate indicative of the initial portion of a brake application. Additional movement of the pedal causes the point of contact between the spring


18


and the shaped surface


26


to move along the more sharply curved portion of the shaped surface, thereby decreasing the effective length of the spring


18


at a continually increasing (exponential) rate, thereby increasing the feedback force on the pedal arm at a similar rate. Accordingly, the feedback force after the initial movement of the pedal arm increases at an exponential rate, providing a feedback force or pedal “feel” that is similar to the feel to which vehicle operators have become accustomed.




Referring now to the embodiment of

FIGS. 3 and 4

, where elements the same or substantially the same as those in the embodiment of

FIGS. 1 and 2

retain the same reference character, the fixed end


20


of the cantilever spring


18


is secured to the bracket


24


, which is secured to the vehicle. The pedal arm


12


is secured to the cantilever spring


18


via a pivot


38


between the fixed end


20


and the free end


28


. A link


40


, which incorporates a load cell that generates an electrical signal as described above, connects the free end


28


with the pedal arm


12


. The adjustable stop


32


is mounted on a U-shaped bracket


42


which extends from the bracket


24


. A Hall effect sensor (not shown) may be mounted on the bracket


42


and a magnet (not shown) may be mounted on the portion of the cantilever spring


18


extending through the bracket


42


to sense movement of the pedal aim


12


as described above. When a brake application is effected, the cantilever spring


18


wraps around the shaped surface


26


in the same manner as described above with respect to the embodiment of

FIGS. 1 and 2

to thereby change the effective length of the spring


18


to provide a variable feedback force transmitted through the link


40


to the pedal arm


12


, thereby providing braking “feel” to the vehicle operator.




Referring now to the embodiment of

FIG. 5

, where elements the same or substantially the same as those in the embodiment of

FIGS. 1 and 2

retain the same reference character, a link


44


, which does not incorporate a load cell, transmits feedback forces providing braking “feel” to the pedal arm


12


. Since braking forces are also transmitted through the bracket


24


which carries the shaped surface


26


, these braking forces are sensed by a load cell


46


, which generates an electrical signal which varies as a function of the forces exerted on the bracket


24


. Since the cantilever spring


18


deflects in response to movement of the pedal arm


12


, an electrical signal representing pedal arm movement may be generated by a magnet


48


mounted on the cantilever spring


18


, which is moved toward and away from a Hall effect sensor


50


mounted on a bracket


52


secured to the vehicle.



Claims
  • 1. A brake pedal assembly comprising:a housing; a pedal arm having a first end and a second end; a pad mounted on said first end of said pedal arm; a pivot mount on said second end of said pedal arm for permitting said pedal arm to pivot about said pivot mount relative to said housing upon a brake application; a shaped surface mounted on said housing; a cantilever spring arm having a fixed end mounted on said housing and a free end opposite said fixed end, said spring arm extending along said pedal arm and continuously abutting said shaped surface; a link extending between said spring arm and said pedal arm for operatively engaging said spring arm with said pedal arm such that said spring arm is deflected against said shaped surface by pivoting of the pedal arm about said pivot mount when the brake application is effected, and said spring arm diverges from said shaped surface to define a free length of said spring arm which varies as said pedal arm pivots, whereby said free length of said spring arm exerts a varying feedback force on said pedal arm which varies as a function of said free length of said spring arm.
  • 2. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein said shaped surface is nonlinear.
  • 3. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a load cell for generating an electrical signal which varies as a function of the force exerted on said pedal arm by said spring arm.
  • 4. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a position sensor which senses movement of said pedal arm and generates an electrical signal which varies as a function of the distance between said pedal arm and said shaped surface.
  • 5. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein said pivot mount pivotally mounts said pedal arm on said housing adjacent said fixed end of said spring arm.
  • 6. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein said pivot mount pivotally mounts said pedal arm on said spring arm.
  • 7. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a sensor which measures deflection of said shaped surface and generates an electrical signal which varies as a function of the deflection of said shaped surface.
  • 8. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein said shaped surface is a curvilinear surface.
  • 9. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein said shaped surface extends along said spring arm add is a curvilinear surface having a larger radius of curvature adjacent said fixed end of said spring arm and a decreasing radius of curvature as said shaped surface extends from said fixed end.
  • 10. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 9, further comprising a load cell for generating an electrical signal which varies as a function of the force applied to said pedal arm by said spring arm and a position sensor for generating an electrical signal which varies as a function of the angular position of said pedal arm.
  • 11. A brake pedal assembly as claimed in claim 1, wherein said shaped surface extends along said spring arm and has a varying radius of curvature.
Parent Case Info

This application claims domestic priority based upon U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/185,457, filed Feb. 28, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
4130027 Leighton Dec 1978 A
4300409 Leighton Nov 1981 A
4695819 Bowsher Sep 1987 A
4888997 Eckert et al. Dec 1989 A
5309361 Drott et al. May 1994 A
5603217 Majersik et al. Feb 1997 A
5729979 Shaw et al. Mar 1998 A
5819593 Rixon et al. Oct 1998 A
5934152 Aschoff et al. Aug 1999 A
6003404 Hannewald Dec 1999 A
6186026 Shaw et al. Feb 2001 B1
6253635 Huber Jul 2001 B1
6298746 Shaw Oct 2001 B1
20010015111 Rixon et al. Aug 2001 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
19500568 Jul 1996 DE
2241050 Aug 1991 GB
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/185457 Feb 2000 US