The invention is related to a single carrier transmission for ultra-reliable and low latency communication systems in order to provide a reliable communication system having minimum spectral efficiency loss by using an adaptive roll-off factor in a block.
The main goal of 4th Generation (4G) communication systems is to improve the throughput of the system. Besides the enhancement of system throughput, different requirements for various applications should be satisfied in 5th generation (5G) and beyond technologies.
One of the new generation wireless communication technologies is Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Communication systems (URLLC). In order to achieve URLLC technology, reliability needs to be increased up to 99.999% and the latency time needs to be reduced to a maximum 1 millisecond.
The low latency is important for mission critical services and applications, such as automated intelligent transport systems, tele-surgery, fault detection and industry automation. As we know, surgical operations can be carried out with robot arms having URLLC technology. However recently, the complex transportation conditions that have been increasing gradually are expected to be alleviated by transferring information between vehicles correctly with the use of URLLC technology.
Due to this reason, in order to meet the reliability and latency demands that are required for URLLC, various technology components of Long Term Evolution (LTE) including frame structure, resource allocation, link adaptation, and transmission schemes need to be redesigned.
In single carrier transmission, a user transmits its data over the entire frequency band. This corresponds to the shorter symbol time in a time domain. As a result of transferring shorter packages in a time domain, less processing time is created at the transmitter and receiver. By means of reducing the processing time as mentioned herein, a single carrier transmission creates the possibility of providing ultra-reliability within low latency times.
In a standard single carrier transmission, the data bits are initially modulated and following this, the modulated symbols are converted to pulses in order to be able to transmit them via air. The shape of the pulse defines the shape of the signal.
The pulse type for a system is decided by taking into consideration the specific characteristics of the existing pulses. For example, if it is desired for the signal to be localized in both a frequency and a time domain, a Gaussian pulse may be preferred. The Gaussian pulse is used in GSM systems. However, the Gaussian pulse causes interference between symbols. Due to this reason raised-cosine pulses are utilized for communication systems as they are Nyquist pulses.
The Nyquist pulse means that there are no contributions from other pulses in the peak point of each pulse. In other words, due to the orthogonality between the pulses, there is no interference between symbols, as experienced with the Gaussian pulse.
The Raised Cosine pulse is localized in the frequency domain, however, it needs infinite time to be created. Therefore the pulse is truncated in the time domain. There are three basic parameters that characterize the raised-cosine filter. These are sampling frequency, span and the roll-off factor. The sampling frequency defines the number of samples per second. The span decides the number of symbols for the truncation. The roll-off factor defines the power of the filter side lobes at the time domain and the bandwidth that is occupied in the frequency domain.
The range of the roll-off factor is between 0 and 1, and the increasing of the roll-off factor results with a better-localized signal in the time domain, corresponding to a wider consumed bandwidth at the frequency domain, and with a lower self-interference caused by truncation. Due to this reason the reliability of the transmission increases. However, on the other hand, the unnecessary increase in roll-off factor leads to losses in spectral efficiency.
Raised CosineIn conventional single carrier transmission, Raised Cosine pulses with the same roll-off factor are used within a block, as shown in
The bandwidth consumed with a Raised Cosine pulse as a function of the data speed (R) and the roll-off factor (a) used, is defined as BW=R.(1+α). The bandwidth that is consumed herein respectively equals to R and 2R for α=0 and α=1. Therefore when the Raised Cosine pulse which is α=1, is compared to the Raised Cosine pulse which is α=0, it consumes twice as much bandwidth.
The aim of the invention is to provide a single carrier transmission system having;
The single carrier transmission subject to the invention is formed of steps that minimizes spectral efficiency loss and reduces out of band emission by using adaptive filtering in a block. Different filter parameters for different symbols in a specific block are used in single carrier transmission.
These process steps have been illustrated in
After the message information is prepared, the message is converted into symbols. Before transmitting the signal, the symbols are filtered by square root Raised Cosine (SRRC) filters in a transmitter.
The filtering process of the data information that has been transmitted is necessary in order to control or reduce out of band emission. As illustrated in
The minimum roll-off factor is used for the center symbols for the transmitted data block and the roll-off factor is increased successively from the center pulses towards the edge pulses, cause more out of band emission. Due to this reason, the maximum roll-off factor is used for side pulses.
The signal that is transmitted travels over a wireless channel with a limited band. The additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is added before reaching the receiver, to the signal that is transmitted which comprises a channel effect.
The receiver uses the same SRRC filter and roll-off factor that is used in the transmitter. In this way, the overall filter is a Raised-Cosine filter.
The single carrier transmission is formed of the following process steps that minimizes spectral efficiency loss and reduces out of band emission by using adaptive filtering in a block;
When the proposed single carrier transmission with an adaptive roll-off factor is compared with the classic single carrier transmission with a fixed roll-off factor, it can be seen that it provides reduced adjacent channel interference, lower latency and less occupied bandwidth, as shown in
Applicability of single carrier with adaptive Raised Cosine filtering does not require any extra step compared with the conventional SC systems. It can easily be applied to industry by using similar methodology with the conventional systems.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2018/20700 | Dec 2018 | TR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/TR2019/051198 | 12/24/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/139294 | 7/2/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20080007346 | Jensen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20170111197 | McFarthing | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180027590 | Yerramalli et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180054269 | Cui | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180191545 | Liu | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2015185726 | Dec 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for corresponding PCT/TR2019/051198, dated Jun. 23, 2020. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for corresponding PCT/TR2019/051198, dated Jun. 23, 2020. |
Tusha et al., “Single Carrier Transmission for URLLC with Adaptive Radio Resource Utilization”, 2019 15th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) Date of Conference: Jun. 24-28, 2019; DOI: 10.1109/IWCMC.2019.8766484 Jun. 28, 2019 (Jun. 28, 2019). |
Bennis et al., “Ultrareliable and Low-Latency Wireless Communication: Tail, Risk, and Scale”, Proceedings of the IEEE (vol. 106 , Issue: 10 , Oct. 2018) pp. 1834-1853; Date of Publication: Sep. 26, 2018 DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2867029 Sep. 28, 2018 (Sep. 28, 2018). |
Parvez et al., “A Survey on Low Latency Towards 5G: RAN, Core Network and Caching Solutions”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (vol. 20 , Issue: 4 , Fourthquarter 2018) pp. 3098-3130, Date of Publication: May 28, 2018 DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2841349 May 28, 2018 (May 28, 2018). |
Sachs et al., “5G Radio Network Design for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication”, IEEE Network (vol. 32 , Issue: 2 , Mar.-Apr. 2018) pp. 24-31; Date of Publication: Apr. 2, 2018 DOI: 10.1109/MNET.2018.1700232 Apr. 2, 2018 (Apr. 2, 2018). |
Ji et al., “Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications in 5G Downlink: Physical Layer Aspects”, IEEE Wireless Communications (vol. 25, Issue: 3, Jun. 2018) pp. 124-130; Date of Publication: Jul. 4, 2018 DOI: 10.1109/MWC.2018.1700294 Jul. 4, 2018 (Jul. 4, 2018). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220021565 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |