Single component room temperature curable low VOC epoxy coatings

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20030008947
  • Publication Number
    20030008947
  • Date Filed
    February 02, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Published
    January 09, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A single component epoxy coating precursor and a method for making such a precursor, a low VOC epoxy coating and a method for making such a coating, and a method for making a blocked amine which is more stable than previously known ones.
Description


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates generally to epoxy coatings, and more particularly to the use of blocked amine compounds in making epoxy coatings.


[0002] Curable epoxy resin systems are known. Conventional two component epoxy resin systems involve mixing of the epoxy resin and hardener and subsequent application of such mixtures as coatings by various techniques. Once mixed, such systems have short pot lives and must be used within a few hours.


[0003] As a result, efforts have been made to develop what are called one component systems. In one component systems, the curing agent is mixed with the epoxy but is inactive. It can be activated at a later time. One type of one component system involves the use of elevated temperature to activate the cross-linking reaction. However, the use of high temperatures is undesirable in many applications.


[0004] Another type uses latent cure, blocked amine systems in an attempt to alleviate the problem of reduced shelf life. In blocked amine systems, the amine is reacted with a ketone or aldehyde to form a blocked amine which is mixed with the epoxy resin. The system is activated by the addition of water, typically in the form of ambient moisture. This reverses the blocking reaction, forming the amine and the ketone or aldehyde. The amine then reacts with the uncured epoxy resin, and the ketone or aldehyde either evaporates or co-reacts with the epoxy. In the absence of moisture, such blocked amines systems afford a slight improvement in storage stability over conventional two component systems. However, commercial ketimine-based epoxy resin systems still suffer from limited storage stability, typically having a pot life of less than 24 hours. (Shell, 1986, EPON Curing Agents).


[0005] Furthermore, many systems include volatile organic compounds (VOC) or hazardous air pollutants (HAP), which are regulated. Commercial ketimine-based epoxy resin systems have elevated levels of VOCs, generally in excess of 3.5 lbs/gal. Under the current VOC standard for many industrial and maintenance coating applications, the limit is 3.1 lbs/gal of VOCs. This limit is likely to be reduced in the future to less than 2.8 lbs/gal of VOCs.


[0006] The use of ketimines as curing agents for epoxy resins is described in R. T. Holm, “Ketimines as Latent Epoxy Curing Agents,” J. of Paint Tech., Vol. 39, No. 509, June 1967, pp. 385-388. The VOC levels of these compounds is over 3.5 lbs/gal. The reported viscosity of the formulations containing the various ketimines ranged from about 3 to about 36 stokes after storage for 20 days at 25° C. However, these formulations do not provide the long term stability desired for commercial products. The long term stability of the formulations can be evaluated using accelerated aging testing at 55° C. Two weeks storage at 55° C. is equivalent to a shelf life of about six months, while 30 days storage is equivalent to a shelf life of over 1 year. The shelf life at 55° C. is estimated to be only about 12% of the value at 25° C.


[0007] British Patent No. 960,236, which is incorporated herein by reference, attempts to improve the shelf life of ketimine-based single component epoxy coatings by using hydroxyl-containing imines as blocked curing agents. The imines are obtained by reacting one or more imines possessing at least one amino hydrogen and one or more compounds having at least one epoxy group. No shelf life or VOC level is reported for these formulations. U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,785, which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses the use of heterocyclic containing curing agents for use in single component epoxy resin compositions. The heterocycle-containing compound has a backbone chain selected from the group consisting of polyether, polyvinyl, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, and novalac chains and at least two heterocyclic groups of the following general formula as side chains:
1


[0008] wherein R1 and R2 may be the same or different and each represents hydrogen, straight chain or branched C1 to C6 alkyl or alkenyl, or C6 to C8 aryl; or R1 and R2 taken together with the adjacent carbon atom, represents C5 to C7 cycloalkyl: R3 represents C1 to C10 alkylene. A shelf life of 6 months at 40° C. is reported, but no VOC level is given. The viscosity of coating formulations is not disclosed, but it appears to be high for conventional coating applications.


[0009] Therefore, there is a need for a single component epoxy coating precursor having improved shelf life and a method for making such a precursor. There is also a need for a low VOC epoxy coating and for a method of making such a coating. There is also a need for a method of making a blocked amine which can be used in a single component epoxy coating precursor.



SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0010] The present invention solves this need by providing a single component epoxy coating precursor and a method for making such a precursor, a low VOC epoxy coating and a method for making such a coating, and a method for making a blocked amine which is more stable than previously known ones.


[0011] The single component epoxy coating precursor includes an epoxy resin, a first solvent, and a blocked amine. The single component epoxy coating precursor has a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 16 stokes. It can have a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 13 stokes, or a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 7 stokes.


[0012] The method for making a single component epoxy coating precursor includes drying an epoxy resin and a blocked amine, combining and mixing the epoxy resin, the blocked amine, and a first solvent to form the single component epoxy coating precursor, wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 16 stokes. It can have a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 13 stokes, or a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 7 stokes. This level of viscosity stability at 55° C. generally corresponds to over one year of shelf life at room temperature storage conditions.


[0013] A reactive diluent optionally can be added to the single component epoxy coating precursor. Reactive diluents include, but are not limited to, modified glycidyl ethers, acrylates, methacrylates, urethane acrylates and combinations thereof. A water scavenger optionally can be added to the single component epoxy coating precursor. Water scavengers include, but are not limited to, molecular sieves, monocyclic bifunctional oxazolidines and combinations thereof. Pigments may be optionally added to the single component epoxy coating precursor. Pigments include, but are not limited to, titanium dioxide, diarylide yellow, iron oxide, raw umber, burnt umber, phthalocyanine blue, cobalt blue, chinese blue, phthalocyanine green, toluidine red, quinacridone red, dicerylide orange, carbon black, furnale black, lampblack, leafing aluminum and non-leaving aluminum.


[0014] Other formulating aids such as wetting agents, flow and rheology modifiers, light stability additives, etc., known in the art can be also incorporated.


[0015] First solvents which are useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to acetone, p-chlorobenzotrifluoride, t-butyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl propyl ketone and combinations thereof.


[0016] Epoxy resins include, but are not limited to, aliphatic epoxy resins, cycloaliphatic epoxy resins, aromatic epoxy resins and combinations thereof.


[0017] The single component epoxy coating precursor can have a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal, or a VOC level of less than about 2.8 lbs/gal.


[0018] The method of making a low VOC epoxy coating includes drying an epoxy resin and a blocked amine, combining and mixing the epoxy resin, the blocked amine, and a first solvent to form the single component epoxy coating precursor, the single component epoxy coating precursor having a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal, and exposing the single component epoxy coating precursor to water, the single component epoxy coating precursor and water reacting to form the low VOC epoxy coating. The water can be present in any form desired, including, but not limited to liquid water, and moisture in the air. The VOC level can be less than about 2.8 lbs/gal. The single component epoxy coating precursor described above and the blocked amine described below can be used to make the low VOC epoxy coating.


[0019] The method for making the blocked amine includes mixing a solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water, an amine, and an amine blocker selected from ketones and aldehydes in a reaction vessel to form a reaction mixture. Ambient moisture is removed from the reaction vessel. The amine and the amine blocker are reacted to form the blocked amine and water of reaction, and the water of reaction is removed from the reaction mixture while the amine and the amine blocker are reacted. The blocked amine is recovered while maintaining the absence of moisture.


[0020] The solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water includes solvents which can form binary or ternary azeotropes with water. These include, but are not limited to, toluene, xylene and combinations thereof.


[0021] The amine can be a polyamine, and it includes but is not limited to, diethylenetriamine, m-xylylenediamine and combinations thereof.


[0022] The amine blocker is selected from ketones and aldehydes. The ketones and aldehydes may have a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600. They may have between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms. Suitable ketones include, but are not limited to, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, phorone, heptanedione, tetramethylheptanedione, adamantone, acetonyl acetone, methylpropylketone and combinations thereof. Suitable aldehydes include, but are not limited to benzaldehyde, salicylaldehyde and combinations thereof.


[0023] The yield of blocked amine can be greater than about 90% of the theoretical yield, or greater than about 95% of the theoretical yield, or greater than about 97% of the theoretical yield.


[0024] The low VOC epoxy coating includes a reaction product of a single component epoxy coating precursor and water, the single component epoxy coating precursor comprising an epoxy resin and a blocked amine, the single component epoxy coating precursor having a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal. The low VOC epoxy coating can have a VOC level of less than about 2.8 lbs/gal.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0025] The blocked amines were prepared according to the following procedure. The chemicals to be used were dried over molecular sieves. A solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water was placed in a suitably sized round bottom flask fitted with a stir bar, magnetic stir plate, heating mantel, reflux condenser, and a Dean-Stark tube. The solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water includes, but is not limited to, solvents which can form binary or ternary azeotropes with water. Examples of suitable solvents include, but are not limited to, toluene, xylene and combinations thereof. Toluene was used in these experiments as the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water. However, it is to be understood that other solvents capable of forming azeotropes with water could also be used. The flask was charged with an amine, a ketone or aldehyde, and a catalyst. Any appropriate catalyst can be used. Generally, acid based catalysts are used, such as p-toluene sulfonic acid. The neck of the reaction flask was wiped with a small amount of toluene to remove any trace reactants. The flask walls were also rinsed with a small amount of toluene to minimize exposure of the reactants to ambient moisture.


[0026] After the reaction mixture was added to the flask, it was purged under a stream of argon for about 5 minutes while stirring to remove ambient moisture and oxygen. The reflux condenser was quickly put in place and fitted with a gas inlet tube to provide a very slight positive pressure. Alternatively, the reflux condenser can be fitted with a drying tube containing Drierite™ to avoid incorporation of atmospheric water during the reaction or the subsequent cooling period before the flask is transferred to a distillation apparatus, such as a Rotovap™. No significant difference was observed in the efficiency of azeotrope or the theoretical mass of water recovered using either arrangement.


[0027] Water flow to the condenser was started, and the reaction flask and the Dean-Stark tube were wrapped in foil to improve water azeotroping efficiency. The reaction mixture was then stirred and heated. The mixture was maintained under steady state conditions at about 116° C. while stirring until either 100% of the theoretical water of reaction was recovered or until water ceased to azeotrope. The temperature will depend on the particular solvent used, and it should be about the boiling point of the solvent. Here, with toluene as the solvent (BP about 111° C.), the temperature was about 116° C. Water was drained from the Dean-Stark tube as required to prevent overfilling. The water of reaction recovered was over 90% of the theoretical amount, typically over 95%, and generally in the range of 96% to 99%.


[0028] At the end of each run, the reaction flask was cooled overnight to room temperature under a slight increase in initial argon pressure or with the drying tube in place. The positive increase in argon pressure was to prevent the transport of trap oil and moisture into the reaction flask. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was placed in a Rotovap™ to remove toluene and any unreacted ketone or aldehyde. The bath temperature was 70° C., and the vacuum was increased slowly to about 2 mm Hg over one hour. The reaction flask was returned to ambient pressure under argon, removed from the Rotovap™, and placed in a vacuum oven for two days at 70° C. and about 2 mm Hg to remove any remaining traces of toluene, ketone, or aldehyde. Heat to the vacuum oven was turned off, and the flask was cooled to ambient temperature while maintaining a vacuum. Under a stream of argon, the flask was returned to ambient pressure, placed over mole sieves, and capped. The reaction product was evaluated by infrared analysis for free amine.


[0029] Amines made using this procedure were blocked with a variety of different ketones and aldehydes. These blocked amines were then used to make single component epoxy resin precursors. The properties of the precursors and the coatings made from them were then evaluated.


[0030] The viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursors in two solvents, toluene and methylisobutylketone (MIBK), at ambient temperature was monitored. In addition, the viscosity was monitored for the epoxy coating precursors in MIBK at 55° C. The accelerated aging samples were tested on a daily basis for the first 30 days, except on weekends, in order to determine viscosity. The process included removing the samples from the oven, cooling the samples to room temperature, and then measuring the samples in direct comparison with Gardner bubble viscosity tubes. The Gardner bubble viscosity tubes use bubble velocity to determine the viscosity of a sample. The viscosity of the sample is determined by finding the standard tube of known viscosity where the air bubble rises at the same rate with that of the test sample. A viscosity of less than 16 stokes is desirable because formulations remain sprayable with conventional spray equipment at this viscosity.


[0031] Coating properties were also evaluated. Draw-down panels were prepared using a #54 wire bound rod over Bonderite iron phosphate treated 3″×6″×0.0032″ steel panels and stored at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity to evaluate cure time and the physical properties of the films.


[0032] The pencil hardness test is described in Paint Testing Manual by H. A. Gardner and G. G. Sward, 13th Ed. (1972) p. 283-284, which is incorporated herein by reference. The ratings from worst to best are: 6B, 5B, 4B, 3B, 2B, B, HB, F, H, 2H, 3H, 4H, 5H, and 6H.


[0033] For the MEK double rubs, a pad made from 10 plies of gauze material is attached to the ball end of a 2 lb ball peen hammer. The pad is saturated with methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and rubbed across the coated substrate. A constant back and forth motion is used so that only the weight of the hammer applies the force. One double rub is equal to one back and forth movement. The movement is continued until the film is marred and/or begins to be removed by the solvent. One hundred double rubs are required to pass this test.


[0034] Other standard tests were also run.


[0035] Table 1 shows the formulation of the blocked amine and the epoxy coating precursor, and Tables 2 and 3 show the results of the initial evaluation of the epoxy coating precursors and the epoxy coatings.


[0036] The control formulation containing unblocked diethylenetriamine (DETA) cured in 2 hrs as a thin film from MIBK. The bottled control in toluene gelled in 24 hrs, while the control in MIBK gelled in 48 hours under ambient conditions. The control in MIBK stored at 55° C. gelled between 1 and 18 hrs.


[0037] In Run 1, an experimental DETA-based curing agent blocked with acetone was used. The experimental DETA-based curing agent was supplied by Shell with the designation S42686, and contained a mixture of DETA, a proprietary amine, and an alkyl phenol amine (hereafter referred to as “experimental DETA”). The film dried to the touch between 0-24 hrs. The toluene and MIBK formulations stored at room temperature gelled in 7 days and 9 days, respectively. The accelerated aging sample gelled within 24 hrs.


[0038] In Run 2, the experimental DETA-based curing agent was blocked with MIBK. The drying time for this film was 0-24 hrs. Additional films were prepared from this formulation after 3 weeks of aging at room temperature and after 16 days at 55° C. The films were dry to the touch at 6 hrs and 2 hrs. The films made from the aged formulations were blush-free and showed increased gloss with aging of the bottled formulations. Both samples stored at room temperature remained water like with no change in viscosity. The accelerated aging sample showed no change in viscosity until after 15 days. At that time, the viscosity went from about 0.5 to 4.4 stokes within 24 hrs. The sample remained pourable for 2 more days. Gel time was between 17 and 19 days. A replicate sample gelled in 22-24 days with a similar cure profile.


[0039] Run 4 used reagent grade DETA blocked with acetone. The drying time was slow, over 48 hrs, and the accelerated aging sample gelled in less than 24 hrs. These results are similar to the ones with experimental DETA. (Run 2).


[0040] DETA (reagent grade) blocked with MIBK was used in Run 5. Two panels were prepared from this formulation, one fresh and the other aged for two days. The drying time for the first panel was 0-24 hrs. The first panel showed a slight blush and a low gloss on cure. The second panel was monitored at 2 hr intervals to more accurately assess drying time. It was dry to the touch in 4 hrs, and showed no blush and excellent gloss (the wet look) after cure. The bottled samples stored at room temperature remained water like for over 8 weeks. The accelerated aging sample gelled after 24 days. A replicate sample also gelled in about 24 days.


[0041] In Run 6, lysine [H2N(CH2)4CH(NH2)COOH] was blocked with MIBK. One panel containing a 5% excess of blocked amine based upon 4 primary amines, and another containing a 5% excess based on all reactive hydrogens (typically 5) were prepared. The panels remained tacky after 8 hrs, but were dry to the touch the next morning. Pencil hardness was B at 24 hrs and 1 week. The panels showed poor resistance to MEK. The accelerated aging samples showed no increase in viscosity after 29 days. The sample with the lower concentration of blocked amine gelled in less than 6 months, while the sample with the higher level gelled in less than 5 months.


[0042] Run 7 involved the use of DETA blocked with phorone [(CH3)C═CHCOCH═C(CH3)2]. Films were dry to the touch in about 8 hrs. The panel containing less blocked amine required 8-10 hrs. Pencil hardness was <B after 24 hrs and 1 week, and solvent resistance was poor. The accelerated aging sample containing the lower level of blocked amine gelled in 25 days. The sample with the higher concentration of blocked amine gelled in 14 days.


[0043] In Run 8, DETA blocked with 2-heptanedione [CH3(CH2)4COCH3] was used. The films were dry to the touch is 8 hrs. Pencil hardness was B at 24 hrs increasing to F at 1 week. MEK resistance was good, especially for the sample with the higher concentration of blocked amine. The panels were glossy with a slight blush. The mixtures exhibited “crawling” during application. “Crawling” refers to coatings that draw away from the surface and leave holes or voids in the coating. Such bare areas are usually related to the wetting properties of the formulation. The accelerated aging sample with the lower concentration of blocked amine gelled in 25 days, while the sample with the higher concentration gelled at 14 days.


[0044] DETA blocked with tetramethyl heptanedione [(CH3)3CCOCH2COC(CH3)3] was used in Run 9 to evaluate the performance of a diketone. The panels required more than 48 hrs to cure and exhibited inadequate hardness and solvent resistance. The accelerated aging samples showed no change in viscosity after 29 days, and did not gel for more than 6 months.


[0045] In Run 10, panels made with DETA blocked with pyruvic aldehyde dimethyl acetyl were tacky, but nearly dry to the touch after 8 hrs, and they were completely dry the next morning. Pencil hardness was B after 24 hours for the lower concentration of the blocked amine, and it was F after 1 week. The panel made from the higher concentration had a pencil hardness that was <B and H for the same time intervals. The solvent resistance was 100 double rubs after 1 week. The panels had a good gloss and light blush. The sample with the higher concentration of blocked amine showed a change in viscosity from 0.5 to 13 strokes after 14 days of accelerated aging, and gelled in 17 days. The sample with the lower concentration gelled after more than 30 days.


[0046] Run 11 involved the use of DETA blocked with adamantone. After 8 hours, the panels were dry to the touch. The pencil hardness was H, and the MEK resistance was 100 double rubs after one week. The films were medium amber with a gloss <90 and a slight blush. The viscosity of the formulation with the lower concentration of blocked amine, increased from 0.5 to 4 stokes in 14 days, and it gelled at between 16 and 21 days. The formulation having the higher concentration of blocked amine gelled in 13 days.


[0047] In Run 12, DETA blocked with acetonyl acetone [CH3COCH2CH2COCH3] was used. The panels remained soft and too tacky for physical evaluation after one week. After 28 days, no change in viscosity was found in the accelerated aging samples.


[0048] Meta-xylylenediamine blocked with MIBK was used in Run 13. Within 8 to 9 hours the panels were dry to the touch. According to the literature, blocked amines prepared from meta-xylylenediamine and MIBK dry to the touch in 4 hours at room temperature in the presence of a phenol accelerator. The pencil hardness for the lower concentration of blocked amine was B after 24 hrs, HB after 48 hrs, and HB after 72 hrs. The MEK double rubs were 50 after 24 hrs, 100 after 48 hrs, and 100 after 72 hrs. The panel passed the direct impact tasting, cross hatch and ¼ inch mandrel bend test. The panel showed good gloss and appearance. The panel containing the higher concentration of blocked amine showed a pencil hardness of F after 24 hrs, F after 48 hrs, and H after 72 hrs. The MEK double rubs results were 90 after 24 hrs, 100 after 48 hrs, and 100 after 72 hrs. This panel also passed the direct impact, cross hatch and ¼ inch mandrel bend tests. No viscosity change occurred until after 30 days of accelerated aging. The formulation with the lower concentration of blocked amine remained unchanged after 40 days of accelerated aging and did not gel for more than 6 months. The formulation having the higher concentration of blocked amine had a viscosity of 2.8 stokes after 40 days, and it did not gel for more than 4.5 months.


[0049] Run 14 involved xylylenediamine blocked with diisobutylketone (DIBK). Both panels required more than 48 hrs to dry. They showed a pencil hardness of B after one week. At one week, the MEK double rubs were 20 for the lower concentration and 100 for the higher concentration. The panel passed the other tests. The films were water white with a gloss >90. The aging samples remained unchanged after 13 days.


[0050] In summary, Runs 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, and 13 resulted in thin film cure times of 8 hrs or less. Runs 7, 8, and 11 had reasonable viscosity stability at 55° C. The films that produced the best overall physical properties, cure rate, and with over 20 days of viscosity stability at 55° C. were Runs 2, 5, and 13.


[0051] From these studies, we found that the effectiveness of the blocking agent in providing long term stability for the single component epoxy coating precursors varies depending on the molecular weight of the blocking agents. A blocking agent having a molecular weight in the range of 30 to 600 provides good long term stability.


[0052] The blocked amine used in Run 5, DETA blocked with MIBK, was also evaluated with the addition of titanium dioxide (TiO2). Three formulations of DETA blocked with MIBK were tested under accelerated aging conditions: 3.5 g of DETA blocked with MIBK without TiO2, 3.5 g of DETA blocked with MIBK with 13% TiO2, and 3.8 g of DETA blocked with MIBK with 13% TiO2. The formulations containing TiO2 gelled in 18 days, as compared to 24 days for the sample without TiO2. The 3.5 g of DETA blocked with MIBK with 13% TiO2, was slower to cure than the control. However, by increasing the concentration of the blocked amine (3.8 g of DETA), a slight improvement in thin film cure times and physical properties occurred. Results are further described in Table 4.


[0053] Tests were run with reduced solvent (VOC) levels. The results are shown in Table 5 with regard to storage stability, thin film set time and the physical properties of formulations. Similar results occurred for cure and physical properties regardless of the solvent level. The data showed that under accelerated aging conditions, a sample containing half the MIBK concentration gelled in 12 to 14 days, compared to about 24 days for the normal level of MIBK in the control. The control contained 4.0 lbs/gal volatiles while the reduced solvent formulations contained 2.8 lbs/gal of volatiles.
1TABLE 1FormulationsRunControl12A2B2C45AAmineDETADETA-basedDETA-basedDETA-basedDETA-basedDETADETAexperimentalexperimentalexperimentalexperimentalamineamineamineamineBlocking AgentAcetoneMIBKMIBKMIBKAcetoneMIBKDraw-downFormulationSolventMIBKMIBKMIBKMIBKMIBKMIBKEpoxy resinBlocked AmineAgingNone3 weeks at RT16 days at 55° C.Run5B6A6B7A7B8A8BAmineDETALysineLysineDETADETADETADETABlocking AgentMIBKMIBKMIBKPhoronePhorone2-heptanedione2-heptanedioneDraw-downFormulationSolventMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gEpoxy resin  10 g  10 g  10 g  10 g  10 g  10 gBlocked Amine3.55 g4.42 g3.98 g4.96 g3.42 g4.26 gAgingRun9A9B10A10B11A11BAmineDETADETADETADETADETADETABlocking Agenttetramethyltetramethylpyruvic aldehydepyruvic aldehydeAdamantoneAdamantoneheptanedioneheptanedionedimethyl acetaldimethyl accetalDraw-downFormulationSolventMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gEpoxy resin  10 g10 g  10 g  10 g  10 g  10 gBlocked Amine5.05 g6.283.51 g4.38 g4.26 g5.30 gAgingRun12A12B13A13B14A14BAmineDETADETAXylylenediamineXylylenediamineXylylenediamineXylylenediamineBlocking AgentAcetonyl acetoneAcetonylMIBKMIBKDIBKDIBKacetoneDraw-downFormulationSolventMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gMIBK - 10 gEpoxy resin  10 g  10 g 10 g 10 g  10 g  10 gBlocked Amine3.42 g4.26 g3.5 g4.3 g4.41 g5.49 gAging


[0054]

2





TABLE 2










Evaluation Blocked Amines































Toluene
MIBK
MIBK






MEK


Cross
1/4″
Film

at RT
at RT
at 55° C.



Time
Dry to
Pencil
Dbl.


Hatch
Mandrel
Color
Gloss
(Daily/
(Daily/
(Daily/


Run
(hrs)
Touch
Hardness
Rubs
20 lbs
40 lbs
Adhesion
Bend
(1 wk)
(1 wk)
24 hrs)
24 hrs)
24 hrs)





Control

2 hrs














24

2H 
Passed




Water

Gelled

Gelled






(100)




white

in 24 hrs

in 1-18











blush



hrs



48

3H 








Gelled















in 48















hrs




168-


Passed
Passed
Passed
Some
Very



wk


(100)


linear
slight









failure; no
stress









squares
crack-










ing


1

0-24




hrs



24

2H
51, soft-








Gelled in






ening;








24 hrs






24 hr full






recovery



48


Passed (100)



168-

2H 
Passed (100)
Passed
Partial
Passed
Failed;


Gelled in
Gelled



wk




“rim”

lost


7 days
in 9








failure

adhe-



days










sion


2A

0-24




hrs



24
Gummy
2B 
0




Light











amber











high











gloss



48/72
Dry

0/0




1 wk

H
100;
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed






softening






didn't go






to bare






metal



2 wk

H

Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed



3 wk

2H 

Passed
Slight
Passed
Passed








“rim”








failure


2B

6 hrs



 2
Sticky






Light











amber











good











gloss



 4
Tacky



 6
Dry to




touch,




FP



 8
Dry to




touch,




FP,




recovers


2C

2 hrs



 2
Dry to






Light




touch,






amber




slight






no




FP






blush











high











gloss











(wet











look)



 4
Dry to




touch,




slight




FP



 6
Dry to




touch,




slight




FP



 8
Dry to










No change




touch,










after 14




slight










days,




FP,










Passed




recovers










aging test



24











Gelled















between















17-19 days



48/72

HB
 80
Passed
Passed
Passed





Replicate















gelled in















22-24 days



96

HB
 90



1 wk

F
100
Passed
Passed
Passed


4

24-48






Mod



Water











amber



like




hrs ?






mod











blush











orange











peel



24
Tacky
HB
 42








Gelled in















24 hrs



48/72
Week-
HB
60/75




end



96
Dry

 75



1 wk

F
100
Passed
Passed
Slight




No









failure




change



2 wk










Not














moni-














tored


5A

0-24









Water




hrs









like



24

HB
 35




Clear











low











gloss











slight











blush



48/72

B/B
42/65



96

B
 72



1 wk

B
 90



2 wk

F
100,






slight






softening


5B

4 hrs



 2
Wet



 4
Dry to




touch,




slight




FP



 6
Dry to




touch,




slight




FP



 8
Dry to




touch,




no FP



24







Clear











high











gloss











no











blush



1 wk



Passed
Slight
Passed





Gelled in








“rim”






about 24








failure






days


6A

8-24




hrs



24
Dry to
<B  
<10




touch,




slight




FP



1 wk

B
 15
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Water



Gelled in











white



less than 5











dull



months











slightly











bluish


6B

8-24




hrs



24/48

B
 20



72/96







Water



Gelled in











white



less than 6











dull



months











slightly











bluish



1 wk

B
 15
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed


7A

8-10




hrs



24

<B  
 <5



1 wk

<B  
 6
Failed
Failed
Passed
Passed
Dark
>90


Gelled in 25











amber



days


7B

8 hrs



24

<B  
 <5



1 wk

B
 6
Failed
Failed
Partial
Passed
Dark
>90


Gelled in 14









Failure

amber



days


8A

7 hrs



 8
7 hrs




dry




to touch




very




slight




FP



24

B
 10



1 wk

F
100
Passed
Failed
Passed
Passed
Yellow
<90


Gelled in






(dulled




medium



14 days






film)




amber











blush


8B

6 hrs



 6
dry to




touch




very




slight




FP



24

B
100






(dulled






film)



1 wk

F
100 (no
Passed
Failed
Passed
Failed
Yellow
<90


Gelled in






effect




medium



25 days











amber











blush


9A

>48 hrs



24
Tacky,
Gummy
Gummy




FP



1 wk

<B  
10
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Water
>90


Gelled in











white



more than 6















months


9B

>48 hrs



24
Tacky,
Gummy
Gummy




FP



1 wk

<B  
15
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed




Gelled in















more than 6















months


10A

8-24




hrs



 8
nearly




dry





B
<10



1 wk

F
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Light
>90


Gelled in






(dulled




amber



more than






film)




blush



30 days


10B

8-24



 8
nearly




dry



24

<B  
 5



1 wk

H
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Failed
Light
<90


Gelled in






(dulled




amber



17 days






film)


11A

8-9 hrs



24

B
<10



1 wk

H
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Failed
Medium
<90


Gelled






(dulled




amber



between






film)




blush



16 and 21















days


11B

8-9 hrs



24

B
 10



1 wk

H
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Failed
Medium
<90


Gelled in






(dulled




amber



13 days






film)


12A

>1 wk


12B

>1 wk


13A

9 hrs



24

B
 50



48

HB
100



72

HB
100



1 wk

HB
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed




Gelled in






(dulled








more than






film)








6 mths


13B

8 hrs



24

B
90



48

HB
100



72

HB
100



1 wk

HB
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed




Gelled in






(dulled








more than






film)








4.5 mths


14A

>48 hrs



24

Sticky
Sticky



1 wk

B
 20
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Water
>90











white


14B

>48 hrs



24

Sticky
Sticky



1 wk

B
100
Passed
Passed
Passed
Passed
Water
>90






(slight




white






dulling)










[0055]

3





TABLE 3










Overall Film Evaluations Based on Visual Observation








Run
Comments





 4
Moderate blush


 6A
Excellent flow upon application, gloss diminished after 8 hrs


 6B
Excellent flow upon application, gloss diminished after 8 hrs


 7A
Good flow upon application, slight fisheyes


 7B
Good flow upon application, slight fisheyes


 8A
Poor flow, crawling


 8B
Poor flow, crawling


 9A
Fairly good flow, slight crawling


10A
Good flow upon application


10B
Good flow upon application


11A
Good flow upon application


11B
Good flow upon application


12A
Poor flow upon application, crawling, fisheyes


12B
Poor flow upon application, crawling, fisheyes


14A
Very good flow upon application


14B
Very good flow upon application


15A
Good flow upon application


15B
Good flow upon application










[0056]

4





TABLE 4










Physical Data for Epoxy Formulations With and Without Titanium Dioxide












Hardness (24 hours)
FORMULATION
Dry to touch
MEK Double Rubs
Gel time


















Ingredients
Grams
(hours)
Day 1
Day 5
Day 6
Day 1
Day 5
Day 6
(days)
Comments




















RUN 5












48262-38-16A









Passed direct impact, cross


48220-44-09









hatch and 1/4″ mandrel bend


3.9 VOC









testing after 1 week, gloss and












appearence excellent


MIBK-DETA
3.5
5 Hours, NFP
F
H
H
100
100
100
24 daysA


MIBK
10


EPON 828
10


TiO2
0


48262-41-13B









Sample very slow to cure after


48220-65-07









2 weeks achieved “HB” pencil


3.9 VOC









hardness and 100 MEK double












rubs with slight dulling. Passed












direct impact, cross hatch and












mandrel bend tests.


MIBK-DETA
3.5
8 hours, sl FP
Too
<B  
<B  
Too
4
7
18 daysB





soft


soft


MIBK
10


EPON 828
10


TiO2
˜13%


48262-41-28

4 hours,
2H

H
100

100
18 days


>4.0 VOC

DTT, FP


MIBK-DETA
3.8








Passed direct impact, cross












hatch and 1/4″ mandrel bend












testing, gloss and appearence












excellent


MIBK
10


EPON 828
10


TiO2
˜13%








A
No gel time taken for this sample used gel time for identical formulation 48220-44-09







B
No gel time taken for this sample used gel time for identical formulation prepared with dried TiO2 48220-65-07









[0057]

5





TABLE 5










Physical Data for Epoxy Formulations With Different Concentrations of MIBK












FORMULATION

Hardness (24 hours)
MEK Double Rubs
Gel time


















Ingredients
Grams
Dry to touch
Day 1
Day 5
Day 6
Day 1
Day 5
Day 6
(days)
Comments




















Run 2












48262-38-07








Gel 17-19
Passed direct impact, failed 1/4


3.9 VOC








daysA
inch mandrel (rim failure)











Gel 22-24
amber appearance with good











daysB
gloss (>90)


MIBKxp-DETA
3.5
6 hours
B
H
H
40
100
100










MIBK
10
DTT. Very slight FP


















EPON 828
10











48262-38-25








NONE


2.98 VOC


MIBKxp-DETA
3.5
9 hours
<B  
F
F
80
100
100

Passed direct impact, failed












1/4 inch mandrel (rim failure)












amber appearance with good


MIBK
5
DTT, slight FP







gloss (>90)


EPON 828
10


Run 5


48262-38-16


2.98 VOC


MIBK-DETA
3.5
5 Hours, NFP
F
H
H
100
100
100
 ˜24 daysC


MIBK
10


EPON 828
10


48262-39-07


2.98 VOC


MIBK-DETA
3.5
4 hours
H
2H 
2H 
100
100
100
Gel time
Passed direct impact (20 lbs),











12-14 daysD
failed direct impact (40 lbs),












passed cross hatch, failed












1/4 inch mandrel bend (2 wks).












Amber appearance slight blush,












good gloss (<90)


MIBK
5


EPON 828
10








A
Reference sample 48220-28-13 used to determine gel time







B
Reference sample 48220-53-07 used to determine gel time







C
Reference samples 48262-44-09 and 49-07 used to determine gel time







D
Reference samples 48220-65-16 used to determine gel time









[0058] Another set of tests focused on evaluating reduced VOC formulations. The VOC exempt solvents that were evaluated included acetone and p-chlorobenzotrifluoride (available as Oxsol 100 from Occidental Chemical Corp.). Tertiary butyl acetate (t-butyl acetate), for which exempt status is pending, was also evaluated. The nonexempt solvents included methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) and methyl propyl ketone (MPK). The solvents were evaluated in combination with water scavengers, including molecular sieves and Incosol-2® (available from Industrial Copolymers, Ltd.), and several mono and multifunctional reactive diluents. Incosol-2® is a monocyclic bifunctional oxazolidine that reacts with water to form a linear aminoalcohol and an aldehyde.


[0059] Eight-five formulations were prepared from xylylenediamine blocked with MIBK. The formulations are shown in Table 6. The materials were dried over mole sieves prior to use. The epoxy resin (EPON 828 available from Miller Stevenson) and the solvent(s) were combined and vortexed for about one minute until the samples were homogenous. Next, the reactive diluent was added, if used. The water scavenger was then added, if used. The samples were vortexed again for about 0.5 to 1.0 minute each, and the blocked amine was added. The samples were vortexed for a third time after which aliquots were transferred to 8 ml glass culture tubes, capped and put in the oven at 55° C. for accelerated aging evaluation. The remaining mixtures were maintained at room temperature for approximately 13 to 14 hours.


[0060] The results of the testing of these formulations are shown in Tables 7 and 8.
6TABLE 6Storage Stability Test Matrix Run 20 (MIBK-Xylylenediamine Based System)No Reactive DiluentWith742746748757With Incosol +Incosol − 5.0%Reactive DiluentWithWithoutWithWithoutWithWithoutWithWithout2.5% ExcessExcessSolvent SystemIncosolIncosolIncosolIncosolIncosolIncosolIncosolIncosolAmineAmineMIBK45 C. 5 C.55 C.15 C.65 C.25 C.75 C.35 C.2 C.4 C.MPK47 C. 7 C.57 C.17 C.67 C.27 C.77 C.37 C.OXSOL 10049 C. 9 C.59 C.19 C.69 C.29 C.79 C.39 C.t-Butyl Acetate51 C.11 C.61 C.21 C.71 C.31 C.81 C.41 C.Acetone53 C.13 C.63 C.23 C.73 C.33 C.83 C.43 C.No Reactive DiluentWithWith Mole742/TMPTA746/TMPTA748/TMPTA757/TMPTAMole S. +S. − 5.0%Reactive DiluentWithWithoutWithWithoutWithWithoutWithWithout2.5% ExcessExcessSolvent SystemMole SMole SMole SMole SMole SMole SMole SMole SAmineAmineMIBK46 C. 6 C.56 C.16 C.66 C.26 C.76 C.36 C. 1 C.3 C.MPK48 C. 8 C.58 C.18 C.68 C.28 C.78 C.38 C.OXSOL 10050 C.10 C.60 C.20 C.70 C.30 C.80 C.40 C.t-Butyl Acetate52 C.12 C.62 C.22 C.72 C.32 C.82 C.42 C.Acetone54 C.14 C.64 C.24 C.74 C.34 C.84 C.44 C.MIBK/Oxsol 10085 C.*Ketimine at 2.5% excess unless otherwise indicated


[0061]

7





TABLE 7










Storage Stability and Physical Property Data Summary of Reduced VOC Formulations Prepared


from MIBK-Xylylenediamine










Vis-




cosity



















Sample
at 30

Reactive

Solvent
DIT
DIT

Drying
Hardness
Hardness


ID
Days
VOC
Diluent
Scavenger
System
20
40
Gloss
Time
(24 H)
(1 WK)





















1C
#N/A
2.68
None
Mole Sieve +
MIBK
Fail
Fail
72.5
10-12
H
2 H






2.5% Excess




hours






Amine


2C
#N/A
2.68
None
Incosol +
MIBK
Pass
Fail
81.2
10
H
2 H






2.5% Excess




hours






Amine


3C
19
2.7
None
Mole Sieve −
MIBK
Pass
Fail
78
10-12
2 H
3 H






5.0% Excess




hours






Amine


4C
#N/A
2.67
None
Incosol − 5.0%
MIBK
Pass
Fail
85.5
10-12
H
2 H






Excess Amine




hours


5C
5.5
2.69
742
None
MIBK
Pass
Pass
47.5
over 10
<B
H











hours


6C
#N/A
2.69
742/TMPTA
None
MIBK
Pass
Fail
103.5
over 10
3 H
2 H











hours


7C
3.2
2.69
742
None
MPK
Pass
Pass
52.5
over 10
<B
2 H











hours


8C
#N/A
2.69
742/TMPTA
None
MPK
Pass
Fail
101
10-12
2 H
2 H











hours


9C
#N/A
1.33
742
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Very
61.7
over 10
<B
B









Slight

hours









Fail


10C
#N/A
1.47
742/TMPTA
None
OXSOL 100
Fail
Fail
100.2
over 10
3 H
2 H











hours


11C
#N/A
1.48
742
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
64.2
over 10
<B
H







Acetate



hours


12C
#N/A
1.61
742/TMPTA
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
100
over 10
2 H
2 H







Acetate



hours


13C
0.85
1.53
742
None
Acetone
Pass
Slight
45.1
over 10
H
2 H









Failure

hours


14C
#N/A
1.67
742/TMPTA
None
Acetone
Pass
Fail
102.5
10-12
3 H
4 H











hours


15C
2.8
2.69
746
None
MIBK
Pass
Pass
38.3
over 10
<B
2 H











hours


16C
#N/A
2.7
746/TMPTA
None
MIBK
Fail
Fail
89.5
over 10
2 H
2 H











hours


17C
2.5
2.69
746
None
MPK
Pass
Pass
34.9
over 10
<B
F











hours


18C
#N/A
2.7
746/TMPTA
None
MPK
Pass
Fail
80.4
over 10
3 H
2 H











hours


19C
#N/A
1.3
746
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
48.2
over 10
<B
F











hours


20C
#N/A
1.43
746/TMPTA
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Fail
97.4
over 10
2 H
4 H











hours


21C
6.8
1.44
746
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
45.4
over 10
<B
2 H







Acetate



hours


22C
#N/A
1.58
746/TMPTA
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
95.4
over 10
2 H
3 H







Acetate



hours


23C
2.25
1.49
746
None
Acetone
Pass
Pass
25.5
over 10
<B
F











hours


24C
#N/A
1.63
746/TMPTA
None
Acetone
Pass
Fail
97.1
over 10
2 H
2 H











hours


25C
1.65
2.7
748
None
MIBK
Pass
Pass
17.6
over 10
<B
F











hours


26C
#N/A
2.69
748/TMPTA
None
MIBK
Pass
Fail
96.7
over 10
H
2 H











hours


27C
2
2.7
748
None
MPK
Pass
Pass
31
over 10
<B
HB











hours


28C
#N/A
2.69
748/TMPTA
None
MPK
Pass
Fail
82.7
over 10
2 H
2 H











hours


29C
13
1.22
748
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
29.1
over 10
<B
HB











hours


30C
#N/A
1.42
748/TMPTA
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Fail
90
over 10
2 H
2 H











hours


31C
5.5
1.37
748
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
17.3
over 10
<B
<B







Acetate



hours


32C
#N/A
1.56
748/TMPTA
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
93
over 10
2 H
2 H







Acetate



hours


33C
1.4
1.42
748
None
Acetone
Pass
Pass
33.2
over 10
<B
F











hours


34C
#N/A
1.62
748/TMPTA
None
Acetone
Pass
Pass
98
over 10
2 H
4 H











hours


35C
#N/A
2.69
757
None
MIBK
Pass
Fail
60.5
10-12
2 H
2 H











hours


36C
#N/A
2.68
757/TMPTA
None
MIBK
Pass
Fail
99.4
over 10
2 H
4 H











hours


37C
13
2.69
757
None
MPK
Pass
Slight
52.6
over 10
2 H
2 H









Failure

hours


38C
#N/A
2.68
757/TMPTA
None
MPK
Pass
Fail
99.1
10-12
2 H
4 H











hours


39C
#N/A
1.38
757
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Slight
72
10-12
H
2 H









Failure

hours


40C
#N/A
1.48
757/TMPTA
None
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
99.6
over 10
3 H
4 H











hours


41C
#N/A
1.53
757
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Very
63.3
over 10
F
2 H







Acetate

Slight

hours









Fail


42C
#N/A
1.62
757/TMPTA
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
99.4
over 10
2 H
2 H







Acetate



hours


43C
4.4
1.58
757
None
Acetone
Pass
Slight
60.8
10-12
H
H









Failure

hours


44C
#N/A
1.68
757/TMPTA
None
Acetone
Pass
Fail
101.9
over 10
4 H
4 H











hours


45C
5.5
2.69
742
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Pass
35
10-24
<B
B











hours


46C
N/A
2.69
742/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MIBK
Pass
Fail
101.3
10-24
2 H
4 H











hours


47C
3.2
2.69
742
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Pass
29.6
10-24
<B
<B











hours


48C
#N/A
2.69
742/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MPK
Pass
Fail
98.5
10-24
H
2 H











hours


49C
#N/A
1.32
742
Incosol
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
54.5
10-24
<B
HB











hours


50C
#N/A
1.47
742/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
OXSOL 100
Pass
Fail
95.4
10-24
2 H
2 H











hours


51C
13
1.46
742
Incosol
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
54.5
10-24
HB
HB







Acetate



hours


52C
#N/A
1.61
742/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
88.4
10-24
2 H
2 H







Acetate



hours


53C
0.85
1.52
742
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Very
42.5
10-24
<B
F









Slight

hours









Fail


54C
2.8
1.67
742/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Fail
101.2
10-24
2 H
4 H











hours


55C
2.5
2.69
746
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Pass
32.3
10-24
<B
HB











hours


56C
#N/A
2.7
746/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MIBK
Pass
Slight
84
10-24
2 H
2 H









Failure

hours


57C
1.65
2.69
746
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Pass
21
10-24
<B
B











hours


58C
13
2.7
746/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MPK
Pass
Pass
94.5
10-24
2 H
4 H











hours


59C
#N/A
1.29
746
Incosol
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
45.6
10-24
<B
H











hours


60C
#N/A
1.43
746/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
OXSOL 100
Pass
Fail
92.3
10-24
H
4 H











hours


61C
5.5
1.43
746
Incosol
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
38.5
10-24
F
H







Acetate



hours


62C
#N/A
1.58
746/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
93.2
10-24
3 H
3 H







Acetate



hours


63C
1.25
1.48
746
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Pass
24.4
10-24
F
F











hours


64C
3.7
1.63
746/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Slight
99.2
10-24
2 H
4 H









Failure

hours


65C
2.25
2.7
748
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Pass
16.9
10-24
H
B











hours


66C
N/A
2.69
748/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MIBK
Pass
Pass
94
10-24
H
4 H











hours


67C
1.4
2.7
748
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Pass
15.3
10-24
<B
B











hours


68C
13
2.69
748/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MPK
Pass
Pass
96.2
10-24
H
2 H











hours


69C
#N/A
1.21
748
Incosol
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
21.6
10-24
<B
B











hours


70C
#N/A
1.42
748/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
OXSOL 100
Pass
Fail
91.2
10-24
2 H
3 H











hours


71C
4.7
1.36
748
Incosol
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
22.8
10-24
<B
F







Acetate



hours


72C
#N/A
1.46
748/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
83.6
10-24
H
2 H







Acetate



hours


73C
0.65
1.41
748
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Pass
36.9
10-24
<B
<B











hours


74C
3.7
1.62
748/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Pass
91
10-24
H
4 H











hours


75C
#N/A
2.69
757
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Slight
50.7
10-24
2 H
2 H









Failure

hours


76C
#N/A
2.68
757/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MIBK
Pass
Fail
92.1
10-24
2 H
4 H











hours


77C
9
2.69
757
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Slight
45.5
10-24
F
F









Failure

hours


78C
#N/A
2.68
757/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
MPK
Pass
Pass
96.8
10-24
2 H
4 H











hours


79C
#N/A
1.37
757
Incosol
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
65
10-24
H
2 H











hours


80C
#N/A
1.48
757/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
OXSOL 100
Pass
Pass
94.9
10-24
2 H
4 H











hours


81C
#N/A
1.51
757
Incosol
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
62.7
10-24
<B
2 H







Acetate



hours


82C
#N/A
1.62
757/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
93.7
10-24
2 H
>4 H







Acetate



hours


83C
2.5
1.68
757
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Slight
49.6
10-24
F
F









Failure

hours


84C
5.5
1.63
757/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Pass
95.1
10-24
H
4 H











hours


85C
0.5
3.05
None
Mole Sieve
MIBK/
Pass
Very
76.5
10-24
H
2 H







OXSOL 100

Slight

hours









Fail










[0062]

8





TABLE 8










Overall Film Evaluations Based on Visual Observations








Sam-



ple


ID
Comments





 1C
Irregular flow pattern & lower gloss indicate some incompatibility


 2C
Irregular flow pattern & high low gloss indicate some



incompatibility


 3C
Fairly good flow and gloss but brittle film


 4C
Good gloss and flow but brittle film


 5C
Good flow but “high-low” gloss pattern indicates incompatibility


 6C
Excellent gloss, good flow but brittle film


 7C
Good flow but “high-low” gloss pattern indicates incompatibility


 8C
Excellent flow & gloss but brittle film


 9C
Good flow but “high-low” glass pattern indicates incompatibility


10C
Excellent gloss, good flow but very brittle film


11C
Good flow but “high-low” gloss pattern indicates incompatibility


12C
Excellent gloss & flow but brittle film


13C
Classic example of “high low” gloss pattern & incompatibility


14C
Excellent gloss & flow but brittle film


15C
Good flow but poor gloss


16C
Good gloss, excellent flow but brittle film


17C
Good flow, poor gloss, good flexibility


18C
Good flow & gloss but slight haze; brittle film


19C
Excellent flow but poor gloss; flexible film


20C
Excellent gloss & flow but brittle film


21C
Excellent flow but poor gloss; flexible film


22C
Excellent flow & good but brittle film


23C
Good flow, poor gloss but brittle film


24C
Outstanding gloss & flow but brittle film


25C
Poor gloss & flow; blush


26C
Excellent gloss, moderate flow; brittle film


27C
Low gloss, moderately good flow; blush; flexible film


28C
Fairly good flow but irregular gloss indicates incompatibility


29C
Poor gloss; blush, but good flexible film


30C
Excellent gloss; irregular flow; brittle film


31C
Very poor gloss; film soft, mars easily


32C
Excellent gloss; erratic flow pattern; flexible film


33C
Poor flow pattern, low gloss due to incompatibility


34C
Outstanding gloss, flow hardness & flexibility (*)


35C
Classic “hi h-low” loss attern of incom atibilit


36C
Outstanding gloss, erratic flow pattern; brittle film


37C
“high-low” gloss, erratic flow reflects incompatibility


38C
Good gloss & flow but brittle film


39C
“High-low” gloss, erratic flow reflects incompatibility


40C
Excellent gloss, slightly erratic flow, but good flexibility


41C
High-low gloss, erratic flow; incompatibility, flexible film


42C
Outstanding gloss & flow; brittle film


43C
“High-low” gloss; erratic flow reflect incompatibility


44C
Outstanding gloss, good-flow but brittle film


45C
Poor gloss, “high-low” gloss; incompatible but flexible


46C
Outstanding gloss, good flow but brittle film


47C
Poor gloss (“high-low” ) reflect incompatibility flexible film


48C
Outstanding gloss, very good flow but brittle film


49C
Good flow pattern & flexibility but poor gloss


50C
Very good gloss & flow but brittle film


51C
Good flow & flexibility but poor gloss


52C
Good gloss; fairly good flow but brittle film


53C
Classic “high-low” gloss pattern; incompatible flexible film


54C
Outstanding gloss; very good flow but brittle film


55C
Poor flow and gloss; incompatible but flexible film


56C
Very good gloss, flow and relatively good flexibility


57C
Poor flow & gloss; incompatible but flexible film


58C
Outstanding gloss, flow, hardness & flexibility*


59C
Poor flow & gloss; blush, but flexible film


60C
Good gloss & flow but brittle film


61C
Good flow but poor gloss flexible film


62C
Good gloss & glow but brittle film


63C
Poor gloss & flow; incompatible but flexible films


64C
Excellent gloss & flow but brittle film


65C
Poor gloss and flow; soft film; mars easily; blush


66C
Very good gloss, flow & flexibility


67C
Poor gloss; good flow & flexible film


68C
Very good gloss, flow, hardness & flexibility*


69C
Poor gloss; film soft; mars easily, flexible film


70C
Good gloss & flow but brittle film


71C
Poor gloss; film soft, mars easily but flexible


72C
Gloss & flexibility good but “mottled” flow is a problem


73C
Poor gloss, poor flow film soft & mars easily


74C
Very good gloss, flow, hardness & flexibility*


75C
“High-low” gloss pattern reflects incompatibility


76C
Excellent gloss slightly erratic flow & brittle film


77C
Classic “high-low” gloss incompatibility


78C
Very good gloss, flow, hardness & flexibility*


79C
Nice looking film but poor gloss; film flexible


80C
Very good gloss, flow, hardness & flexibility*


81C
Nice looking film but poor gloss, film flexible


82C
Good gloss & flow, hardness & flexibility


83C
“High-low” gloss pattern reflects incompatibility


84C
Very good gloss, flow, hardness & flexibility*


85C
Nice looking film but haze hinders gloss flexible.






Note: Incompatibility in the strictest sense refers to the fact that a portion of the film appears to be insoluble in the residual solvent or reactive diluents.




*Superior film in all aspects except (slightly reduced) gloss.








[0063] After 30 days of accelerated aging, thirty-five of the eighty-five formulation evaluated had measured viscosities of 16 stokes or less, as shown in Table 9. The VOC level of these formulations ranged from 1.22 to 3.05 lbs/gal.


[0064] Of those 35 formulations, 29 had viscosities of 7 stokes or less, as shown in Table 10. The VOC level for these formulations ranged from 1.36 to 3.05 lbs/gal.


[0065] Of the 29 formulations with viscosities of 7 stokes or less, 12 contained Incosol-2® as a water scavenger, 12 contained no water scavenger, and five contained mole sieves. Only the mole sieves were tested in combination with the reactive diluent trimethylolpropanetriacrylate (TMPTA). The formulations containing TMPTA gelled faster than formulations without TMPTA, regardless of the solvent. In addition, six of the 20 TMPTA/mole sieve formulations remained sprayable after thirty days of accelerated aging. None of the samples containing TMPTA without mole sieves maintained acceptable viscosities after thirty days of accelerated aging.


[0066] Five formulations had a viscosity of 1.25 stokes or less and remained water-like. The VOC level for these formulations ranged from 1.41 to 3.05 lbs/gal. Samples 13C, 53C, 63C, and 73C contained acetone as a solvent and sample 85C contained equal parts of acetone and p-chlorobenzotrifluoride as a solvent. None of the five samples contained a multifunctional reactive diluent. Thin films made from these formulations were characterized by low gloss and inadequate hardness.


[0067] Draw-down panels were prepared with a #54 wire bound rod over Bonderite 1000 iron phosphate treated steel panels that were 3″×6″×0.0032″. The panels were held at a constant temperature of 75° F./50 RH and then observed at two-hour increments for ten hours to determine drying time. The majority of the panels required 10-12 hours or more before they were dry to the touch. The samples evaluated in the first phase using the same ketimine dried in 8-10 hours. The slower drying time is attributable to three factors. First, formulations in the second phase had a 2.5 wt % excess amine instead of 5 wt % as used in the first phase experiments. Second, the average coating thickness was 1.83 mils, due to the higher percent solids associated with the panel, rather than about 0.8 mils as in the previous panels. Finally, the constant temperature room was 73° F./45% RH during the thin film dry period, whereas, the previous panels were maintained in a constant temperature room at 75° F./50% RH. These conditions are slightly less favorable and would slightly retard cure time.


[0068] Comparing the effects of the reactive diluents on the coatings, the panels containing TMPTA as a reactive diluent had better hardness and gloss. Among the Epodil™ reactive modifiers, Epodil™ 757, a bifunctional epoxy resin, also exhibited good gloss and hardness. Since the other reactive diluents are monofunctional, these results are consistent with conventional coating chemistry. In summary, independent of VOC levels and storage stability, many test panels show excellent hardness and gloss while still maintaining sufficient flexibility to pass the impact testing.


[0069] Four formulations remained sprayable after 30 days of accelerated aging at 55° C. regardless of base solvent, had gloss values of greater than or equal to 85, passed both 20/40 pound impact testing, and had a pencil hardness of greater than or equal to H after 1 week. The four formulations that met the above criteria are 58C, 68C, 74C, and 84C. Two of these contain MPK as a solvent (Samples 58C and 68C), and two contain acetone (Samples 74C and 84C). The viscosity of both MPK formulations was 13 stokes at day 30, which puts the viscosities around the middle of the acceptable range. As a result, these formulations should remain easily sprayable for months, have acceptable VOC levels (2.7 and 2.69 lbs/gal, respectively), and good physical properties. Samples 74C and 84C have very low VOC levels (1.62 and 1.63 lbs/gal, respectively) and retained near water-like viscosities after accelerated aging for 30 days.


[0070] Many of the samples maintained acceptable viscosities for about six months or more, based on accelerated aging projection, with acceptable physicals and VOC levels.
9TABLE 9Formulations With Viscosities ≦16 Stokes After 30 Days of AcceleratedAging At 55° C.Vis-cositySampleat 30ReactiveSolventDITHardnessIDDaysVOCDiluentScavengerSystem20Gloss(1 WK)5C5.52.69742NoneMIBKPass47.5H7C3.22.69742NoneMPKPass52.52 H13C0.851.53742NoneAcetonePass45.12 H15C2.82.69746NoneMIBKPass38.32 H17C2.52.69746NoneMPKPass34.9F21C6.81.44746Nonet-ButylPass45.42 HAcetate23C2.251.49746NoneAcetonePass25.5F25C1.652.7748NoneMIBKPass17.6F27C22.7748NoneMPKPass31HB29C131.22748NoneOXSOL 100Pass29.1HB31C5.51.37748Nonet-ButylPass17.3<BAcetate33C1.41.42748NoneAcetonePass33.2F37C132.69757NoneMPKPass52.62 H43C4.41.58757NoneAcetonePass60.8H45C5.52.69742IncosolMIBKPass35B47C3.22.69742IncosolMPKPass29.6<B51C131.46742Incosolt-ButylPass54.5HBAcetate53C0.851.52742IncosolAcetonePass42.5F54C2.81.67742/TMPTAMole SieveAcetonePass101.24 H55C2.52.69746IncosolMIBKPass32.3HB57C1.652.69746IncosolMPKPass21B58C132.7746/TMPTAMole SieveMPKPass94.54 H61C5.51.43746Incosolt-ButylPass38.5HAcetate63C1.251.48746IncosolAcetonePass24.4F64C3.71.63746/TMPTAMole SieveAcetonePass99.24 H65C2.252.7748IncosolMIBKPass16.9B67C1.42.7748IncosolMPKPass15.3B68C132.69748/TMPTAMole SieveMPKPass96.22 H71C4.71.36748Incosolt-ButylPass22.8FAcetate73C0.651.41748IncosolAcetonePass36.9<B74C3.71.62748/TMPTAMole SieveAcetonePass914 H77C92.69757IncosolMPKPass45.5F83C2.51.68757IncosolAcetonePass49.6F84C5.51.63757/TMPTAMole SieveAcetonePass95.14 H85C0.53.05NoneMole SieveMIBK/Pass76.52 HOxsol 100


[0071]

10





TABLE 10










Formulations With Viscosities ≦7 Stokes After 30 Days of Accelerated


Aging At 55° C.










Vis-




cosity


















Sample
@ 30

Reactive

Solvent
DIT
DIT

Hardness
Hardness


ID
Days
VOC
Diluent
Scavenger
System
20
40
Gloss
(24 H)
(1 WK)




















5C
5.5
2.69
742
None
MIBK
Pass
Pass
47.5
<B
H


7C
3.2
2.69
742
None
MPK
Pass
Pass
52.5
<B
2 H


13C
0.85
1.53
742
None
Acetone
Pass
Slight
45.1
H
2 H


Failure


15C
2.8
2.69
746
None
MIBK
Pass
Pass
38.3
<B
2 H


17C
2.5
2.69
746
None
MPK
Pass
Pass
34.9
<B
F


21C
6.8
1.44
746
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
45.4
<B
2 H


Acetate


23C
2.25
1.49
746
None
Acetone
Pass
Pass
25.5
<B
F


25C
1.65
2.7
748
None
MIBK
Pass
Pass
17.6
<B
F


27C
2
2.7
748
None
MPK
Pass
Pass
31
<B
HB


31C
5.5
1.37
748
None
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
17.3
<B
<B







Acetate


33C
1.4
1.42
748
None
Acetone
Pass
Pass
33.2
<B
F


43C
4.4
1.58
757
None
Acetone
Pass
Slight
60.8
H
H









Failure


45C
5.5
2.69
742
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Pass
35
<B
B


47C
3.2
2.69
742
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Pass
29.6
<B
<B









Slight









Fail


53C
0.85
1.52
742
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Very
42.5
<B
F









Slight









Fail


54C
2.8
1.67
742/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Fail
101.2
2 H
4 H


55C
2.5
2.69
746
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Pass
32.3
<B
HB


57C
1.65
2.69
746
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Pass
21
<B
B


61C
5.5
1.43
746
Incosol
t-Butyl
Pass
Fail
38.5
F
H







Acetate


63C
1.25
1.48
746
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Pass
24.4
F
F


64C
3.7
1.63
746/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Slight
99.2
2 H
4 H









Failure


65C
2.25
2.7
748
Incosol
MIBK
Pass
Pass
16.9
H
B


67C
1.4
2.7
748
Incosol
MPK
Pass
Pass
15.3
<B
B


71C
4.7
1.36
748
Incosol
t-Butyl
Pass
Pass
22.8
<B
F







Acetate


73C
0.65
1.41
748
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Pass
36.9
<B
<B


74C
3.7
1.62
748/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Pass
91
H
4 H


83C
2.5
1.68
757
Incosol
Acetone
Pass
Slight
49.6
F
F









Failure


84C
5.5
1.63
757/TMPTA
Mole Sieve
Acetone
Pass
Pass
95.1
H
4 H


85C
0.5
3.05
None
Mole Sieve
MIBK/
Pass
Very
76.5
H
2 H







Oxsol

Slight







100

Fail










[0072] The effect of different solvents was also evaluated. Table 11 shows the effect of various solvents using two different blocked amines: DETA blocked with MIBK, and xylylenediamine blocked with MIBK. The solvents from best to worst, regardless of reactive modifier or water scavenger, with respect to hindering gelation were: acetone, MPK, MIBK, t-butyl acetate, and p-chlorobenzotrifluoride. The inability of t-butyl acetate to hinder gelation could be due to the presence of 0.5-1.0% t-butyl alcohol, an impurity that could react with the epoxy resin.


[0073] A mixed solvent system comprised of equal parts p-chlorobenzotrifluoride/MIBK was evaluated (Sample 85C). The formulation showed no increase in viscosity after 30 day of accelerated aging. The calculated VOC level of the formulation was 3.05 lbs/gal, which is slightly higher than the target value of 2.8 lbs/gal. Other physical property values were good. Sample 85C displayed no viscosity increase although p-chlorobenzotrifluoride alone is the least effective solvent at retarding gelation.


[0074] Although not wishing to be bound by theory, we believe that these results are a function of the polarity and hydrogen bonding of the solvents. Table 12 shows a ranking of solvents and their polarity solubility parameters and hydrogen bonding solubility parameters. Oxygen containing solvent systems having both intermediate to high polarity (δP of 6-14) and high hydrogen bonding (δH of 9-14) are unacceptable for stable coating formulations. Systems with both low polarity (δP of 1-2) and low to intermediate hydrogen bonding capabilities (δH of 2-7) have poor capacity to stabilize a blocked amine epoxy coating precursor. Oxygenated solvents with intermediate polarity (δP of 5-10) and intermediate hydrogen bonding (δH of 4-7) are acceptable for stable single component epoxy coating precursors.


[0075] Thus, single component epoxy coating precursors made from blocked amines having an extended shelf life have been demonstrated. Coatings can made from these precursors having VOC levels of less than 3 lbs/gal.


[0076] Coating formulations made according to the present invention may contain additional components, including, but not limited to, pigments, such as titanium dioxide, fillers, such as silica, and other formulation aids, such as wetting agents, defoamers, flow aids, leveling agents, and the like.
11TABLE 11Effect of Solvent System on High TemperatureStorage Stability and Solution ViscosityKetimine + Epoxy ResinSolventStability at 55° C.(Viscosity) (Stokes)DETA-MTBKTolueneNoneMIBKSprayable after 15days50/50 Toluene/MIBKNoneXylylenediamine-MIBKMIBK (a)19 after 30 daysMIBK (b)5.5 after 30 daysMPK (c)3.2 after 30 daysp-chlorobenzotrifluoridegelled after 30 days(d)50/50 MIBK/p-0.5 after 30 dayschlorobenzotrifluoride (e)t-butyl acetate (f)13 after 30 daysacetone (g)0.85 after 30 days(a) contains mole sieves but no reactive diluent (b) contains monofunctional reactive diluent (Epodil ™ 742) but no scavenger (c) contains monofunctional reactive diluent (Epodil ™ 742) but no scavenger (d) contains monofunctional reactive diluent (Epodil ™ 742) but no scavenger (e) contains moles sieves but no reactive diluent (f) contains Incosol-2 ™ and monofunctional reactive diluent (Epodil ™ 742) (g) contains Incosol-2 ™ and monofunctional reactive diluent (Epodil ™ 742)


[0077]

12





TABLE 12










Ranking of Solvents for Stability of Xylylenediamine-MIBK Epoxy


Coatings













Hydrogen Bonding


Solvents
Ranking
Polarity (δP)
(δH)













Acetone
Good
10.4
7


MIBK

6.1
4.1


MPK





Ethyl Acetate

5.3
7.2


Dioxane
Poor
1.8
7.4


T-butyl acetate





Toluene

1.4
2


P-chlorobenzo
Unacceptable




trifluoride


Dimethylformamide

13.7
11.3


Benzyl Alcohol

6.3
13.7






δP - Polar solubility parameter (MPa½)




δH - Hydrogen bonding solubility parameter (MPa½)








[0078] While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for purposes of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in the compositions and methods disclosed herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.


Claims
  • 1. A single component epoxy coating precursor comprising: an epoxy resin; a first solvent; and a blocked amine; wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 16 stokes.
  • 2. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 13 stokes.
  • 3. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 2 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 7 stokes.
  • 4. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 further comprising a reactive diluent.
  • 5. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 4 wherein the reactive diluent is selected from modified glycidyl ethers, acrylates, methacrylates, urethane acrylates and combinations thereof.
  • 6. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 4 wherein the reactive diluent comprises a modified glycidyl ether.
  • 7. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 further comprising a water scavenger.
  • 8. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 7 wherein the water scavenger is selected from molecular sieves, monocyclic bifunctional oxazolidines and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 further comprising a pigment.
  • 10. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 9 wherein the pigment is selected from titanium dioxide, diarylide yellow, iron oxide, raw umber, burnt umber, phthalocyanine blue, cobalt blue, chinese blue, phthalocyanine green, toluidine red, quinacridone red, dicerylide orange, carbon black, furnale black, lampblack, leafing aluminum and non-leaving aluminum.
  • 11. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the first solvent is selected from acetone, p-chlorobenzotrifluoride, t-butyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl propyl ketone and combinations thereof.
  • 12. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the epoxy resin is selected from aliphatic epoxy resins, cycloaliphatic epoxy resins, aromatic epoxy resins and combinations thereof.
  • 13. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the epoxy resin comprises a difunctional bisphenol A/epichlorohydrin derived epoxy resin.
  • 14. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal.
  • 15. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 14 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a VOC level of less than about 2.8 lbs/gal.
  • 16. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the blocked amine comprises a ketone-based blocked amine.
  • 17. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 16 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine comprises a ketone having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 18. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 16 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine comprises a ketone containing between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 19. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the blocked amine comprises an aldehyde-based blocked amine.
  • 20. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 19 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine comprises an aldehyde having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 21. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 19 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine comprises an aldehyde containing between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 22. The single component epoxy coating precursor of claim 1 wherein the blocked amine comprises a methyl isobutyl ketone-xylylenediamine based blocked amine.
  • 23. A method for making a single component epoxy coating precursor comprising: drying an epoxy resin and a blocked amine; combining and mixing the epoxy resin, the blocked amine, and a first solvent to form the single component epoxy coating precursor, wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 16 stokes.
  • 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 13 stokes.
  • 25. The method of claim 23 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 7 stokes.
  • 26. The method of claim 23 further comprising adding a reactive diluent.
  • 27. The method of claim 26 wherein the reactive diluent is selected from modified glycidyl ethers, acrylates, methacrylates, urethane acrylates and combinations thereof.
  • 28. The method of claim 26 wherein the reactive diluent comprises a modified glycidyl ether.
  • 29. The method of claim 23 further comprising adding a water scavenger.
  • 30. The method of claim 29 wherein the water scavenger is selected from molecular sieves, monocyclic bifunctional oxazolidines and combinations thereof.
  • 31. The method of claim 23 wherein the first solvent is selected from acetone, p-chlorobenzotrifluoride, t-butyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl propyl ketone and combinations thereof.
  • 32. The method of claim 23 wherein the epoxy resin is selected from aliphatic epoxy resins, cycloaliphatic epoxy resins, aromatic epoxy resins and combinations thereof.
  • 33. The method of claim 23 wherein the epoxy resin comprises a difunctional bisphenol A/epichlorohydrin derived epoxy resin.
  • 34. The method of claim 23 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal.
  • 35. The method of claim 23 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a VOC level of less than about 2.8 lbs/gal.
  • 36. The method of claim 23 wherein the blocked amine comprises a ketone-based blocked amine.
  • 37. The method of claim 36 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine comprises a ketone having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 38. The method of claim 36 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine comprises a ketone containing between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 39. The method of claim 23 wherein the blocked amine comprises an aldehyde-based blocked amine.
  • 40. The method of claim 39 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine comprises an aldehyde having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 41. The method of claim 39 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine comprises an aldehyde containing between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 42. The method of claim 23 wherein the blocked amine comprises a methyl isobutyl ketone-xylylenediamine based blocked amine.
  • 43. The method of claim 23 further comprising adding a pigment.
  • 44. The method of claim 43 wherein the pigment is selected from titanium dioxide, diarylide yellow, iron oxide, raw umber, burnt umber, phthalocyanine blue, cobalt blue, chinese blue, phthalocyanine green, toluidine red, quinacridone red, dicerylide orange, carbon black, furnale black, lampblack, leafing aluminum and non-leaving aluminum.
  • 45. The method of claim 23 wherein the blocked amine is made by a process comprising: mixing a solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water, an amine, and an amine blocker selected from ketones and aldehydes in a reaction vessel to form a reaction mixture; removing ambient moisture from the reaction vessel; reacting the amine and the amine blocker to form the blocked amine and water of reaction; removing the water of reaction from the reaction mixture while the amine and the amine blocker are reacted; and recovering the blocked amine while maintaining the absence of moisture.
  • 46. The method of claim 45 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water is capable of forming a binary or ternary azeotrope with water.
  • 47. The method of claim 45 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water is selected from toluene, xylene and combinations thereof.
  • 48. The method of claim 45 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water comprises toluene.
  • 49. The method of claim 45 wherein the amine comprises a polyamine.
  • 50. The method of claim 45 wherein the amine is selected from diethylenetriamine, m-xylylenediamine and combinations thereof.
  • 51. The method of claim 45 wherein the amine comprises m-xylylenediamine.
  • 52. The method of claim 45 wherein the amine blocker is a ketone.
  • 53. The method of claim 52 wherein the ketone has a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 54. The method of claim 52 wherein the ketone contains between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 55. The method of claim 52 wherein the ketone is selected from methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, phorone, heptanedione, tetramethylheptanedione, adamantone, acetonyl acetone, methylpropylketone and combinations thereof.
  • 56. The method of claim 52 wherein the ketone comprises methyl isobutyl ketone.
  • 57. The method of claim 45 wherein the amine blocker is an aldehyde.
  • 58. The method of claim 57 wherein the aldehyde has a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 59. The method of claim 57 wherein the aldehyde contains between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 60. The method of claim 57 wherein the aldehyde is selected from benzaldehyde, salicylaldehyde and combinations thereof.
  • 61. The method of claim 57 wherein the aldehyde comprises benzaldehyde.
  • 62. The method of claim 45 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water comprises toluene, the amine comprises m-xylylenediamine, and the amine blocker comprises methyl isobutyl ketone.
  • 63. A method of making a low VOC epoxy coating, comprising: drying an epoxy resin and a blocked amine; combining and mixing the epoxy resin, the blocked amine, and a first solvent to form the single component epoxy coating precursor, the single component epoxy coating precursor having a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal; and exposing the single component epoxy coating precursor to water, the single component epoxy coating precursor and water reacting to form the low VOC epoxy coating.
  • 64. The method of claim 63 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a VOC level of less than about 2.8 lbs/gal.
  • 65. The method of claim 63 further comprising adding a reactive diluent to the single component epoxy coating precursor.
  • 66. The method of claim 65 wherein the reactive diluent is selected from modified glycidyl ethers, acrylates, methacrylates, urethane acrylates and combinations thereof.
  • 67. The method of claim 65 wherein the reactive diluent comprises a modified glycidyl ether.
  • 68. The method of claim 63 further comprising adding a water scavenger to the the single component epoxy coating precursor.
  • 69. The method of claim 68 wherein the water scavenger is selected from molecular sieves, monocyclic bifunctional oxazolidines and combinations thereof.
  • 70. The method of claim 63 wherein the first solvent is selected from acetone, p-chlorobenzotrifluoride, t-butyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl propyl ketone and combinations thereof.
  • 71. The method of claim 63 wherein the epoxy resin is selected from aliphatic epoxy resins, cycloaliphatic epoxy resins, aromatic epoxy resins and combinations thereof.
  • 72. The method of claim 63 wherein the epoxy resin comprises a difunctional bisphenol A/epichlorohydrin derived epoxy resin.
  • 73. The method of claim 63 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 16 stokes.
  • 74. The method of claim 63 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 13 stokes.
  • 75. The method of claim 63 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 7 stokes.
  • 76. The method of claim 63 wherein the blocked amine comprises a ketone-based blocked amine.
  • 77. The method of claim 76 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine includes a ketone having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 78. The method of claim 76 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine includes a ketone containing between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 79. The method of claim 63 wherein the blocked amine comprises an aldehyde-based blocked amine.
  • 80. The method of claim 79 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine includes an aldehyde having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 about 600.
  • 81. The method of claim 79 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine includes an aldehyde containing between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 82. The method of claim 63 wherein the blocked amine comprises a methyl isobutyl ketone-xylylenediamine based blocked amine.
  • 83. The method of claim 63 further comprising adding a pigment.
  • 84. The method of claim 83 wherein the pigment is selected from titanium dioxide, diarylide yellow, iron oxide, raw umber, burnt umber, phthalocyanine blue, cobalt blue, chinese blue, phthalocyanine green, toluidine red, quinacridone red, dicerylide orange, carbon black, furnale black, lampblack, leafing aluminum and non-leaving aluminum.
  • 85. The method of claim 63 wherein the blocked amine is made by a process comprising: mixing a solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water, an amine, and an amine blocker selected from ketones and aldehydes in a reaction vessel to form a reaction mixture; removing ambient moisture from the reaction vessel; reacting the amine and the amine blocker to form the blocked amine and water of reaction; removing the water of reaction from the reaction mixture while the amine and the amine blocker are reacted; and recovering the blocked amine while maintaining the absence of moisture.
  • 86. The method of claim 85 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water is capable of forming a binary or ternary azeotrope with water.
  • 87. The method of claim 85 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water is selected from toluene, xylene and combinations thereof.
  • 88. The method of claim 85 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water comprises toluene.
  • 89. The method of claim 85 wherein the amine comprises a polyamine.
  • 90. The method of claim 85 wherein the amine is selected from diethylenetriamine, m-xylylenediamine and combinations thereof.
  • 91. The method of claim 85 wherein the amine comprises m-xylylenediamine.
  • 92. The method of claim 85 wherein the amine blocker is a ketone.
  • 93. The method of claim 92 wherein the ketone has a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 94. The method of claim 92 wherein the ketone contains between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 95. The method of claim 92 wherein the ketone is selected from methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, phorone, heptanedione, tetramethylheptanedione, adamantone, acetonyl acetone, methylpropylketone and combinations thereof.
  • 96. The method of claim 92 wherein the ketone comprises methyl isobutyl ketone.
  • 97. The method of claim 85 wherein the amine blocker is an aldehyde.
  • 98. The method of claim 97 wherein the aldehyde has a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 99. The method of claim 97 wherein the aldehyde contains between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 100. The method of claim 97 wherein the aldehyde is selected from benzaldehyde, salicylaldehyde and combinations thereof.
  • 101. The method of claim 97 wherein the aldehyde comprises benzaldehyde.
  • 102. The method of claim 85 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water comprises toluene, the amine comprises m-xylylenediamine, and the amine blocker comprises methyl isobutyl ketone.
  • 103. A method for making a blocked amine comprising: mixing a solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water, an amine, and an amine blocker selected from ketones and aldehydes in a reaction vessel to form a reaction mixture; removing ambient moisture from the reaction vessel; reacting the amine and the amine blocker to form the blocked amine and water of reaction; removing the water of reaction from the reaction mixture while the amine and the amine blocker are reacted; and recovering the blocked amine while maintaining the absence of moisture.
  • 104. The method of claim 103 wherein the water of reaction is removed for a length of time until 100% of a theoretical water of reaction is removed from the reaction mixture.
  • 105. The method of claim 103 wherein the water of reaction is removed for a length of time until the water of reaction ceases to azeotrope.
  • 106. The method of claim 103 further comprising heating the reaction mixture until the water of reaction is removed.
  • 107. The method of claim 106 further comprising cooling the reaction mixture after the water of reaction has been removed.
  • 108. The method of claim 107 further comprising heating the reaction mixture and placing the reaction mixture under a vacuum after the water of reaction has been removed.
  • 109. The method of claim 103 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water is capable of forming a binary or ternary azeotrope with water.
  • 110. The method of claim 103 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water is selected from toluene, xylene and combinations thereof.
  • 111. The method of claim 103 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water comprises toluene.
  • 112. The method of claim 103 wherein the amine comprises a polyamine.
  • 113. The method of claim 103 wherein the amine is selected from diethylenetriamine, m-xylylenediamine and combinations thereof.
  • 114. The method of claim 103 wherein the amine comprises m-xylylenediamine.
  • 115. The method of claim 103 wherein the amine blocker is a ketone.
  • 116. The method of claim 115 wherein the ketone has a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 117. The method of claim 115 wherein the ketone contains between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 118. The method of claim 115 wherein the ketone is selected from methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, phorone, heptanedione, tetramethylheptanedione, adamantone, acetonyl acetone, methylpropylketone and combinations thereof.
  • 119. The method of claim 115 wherein the ketone comprises methyl isobutyl ketone.
  • 120. The method of claim 103 wherein the amine blocker is an aldehyde.
  • 121. The method of claim 120 wherein the aldehyde has a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 122. The method of claim 120 wherein the aldehyde contains between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 123. The method of claim 120 wherein the aldehyde is selected from benzaldehyde, salicylaldehyde and combinations thereof.
  • 124. The method of claim 120 wherein the aldehyde comprises benzaldehyde.
  • 125. The method of claim 103 wherein the solvent capable of forming an azeotrope with water comprises toluene, the amine comprises m-xylylenediamine, and the amine blocker comprises methyl isobutyl ketone.
  • 126. The method of claim 103 wherein the yield of blocked amine is greater than about 90% of the theoretical yield.
  • 127. The method of claim 103 wherein the yield of blocked amine is greater than about 95% of the theoretical yield.
  • 128. The method of claim 103 wherein the yield of blocked amine is greater than about 97% of the theoretical yield.
  • 129. The product produced by the method of claim 103.
  • 130. A low VOC epoxy coating comprising: a reaction product of a single component epoxy coating precursor and water, the single component epoxy coating precursor comprising an epoxy resin, a first solvent, and a blocked amine, the single component epoxy coating precursor having a VOC level of less than about 3 lbs/gal.
  • 131. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a VOC level of less than about 2.8 lbs/gal.
  • 132. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor has a viscosity after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. of less than 16 stokes.
  • 133. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 13 stokes.
  • 134. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the viscosity of the single component epoxy coating precursor after 30 days at a temperature of 55° C. is less than 7 stokes.
  • 135. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the epoxy resin is selected from aliphatic epoxy resins, cycloaliphatic epoxy resins, aromatic epoxy resins and combinations thereof.
  • 136. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 130 wherein the epoxy resin comprises a difunctional bisphenol A/epichlorohydrin derived epoxy resin.
  • 137. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 130 wherein the first solvent is selected from acetone, p-chlorobenzotrifluoride, t-butyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl propyl ketone and combinations thereof.
  • 138. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 130 wherein the blocked amine comprises a ketone-based blocked amine.
  • 139. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 138 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine includes a ketone having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 140. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 138 wherein the ketone-based blocked amine includes a ketone containing between about 3 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 141. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 130 wherein the blocked amine comprises an aldehyde-based blocked amine.
  • 142. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 141 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine includes an aldehyde having a molecular weight in the range of about 30 to about 600.
  • 143. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 141 wherein the aldehyde-based blocked amine includes an aldehyde containing between about 2 and 14 carbon atoms.
  • 144. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the blocked amine comprises a methyl isobutyl ketone-xylylenediamine based blocked amine.
  • 145. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor further comprises a reactive diluent.
  • 146. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 145 wherein the reactive diluent is selected from modified glycidyl ethers, acrylates, methacrylates, urethane acrylates and combinations thereof.
  • 147. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 145 wherein the reactive diluent comprises a modified glycidyl ether.
  • 148. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 wherein the single component epoxy coating precursor further comprises a water scavenger.
  • 149. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 148 wherein the water scavenger is selected from molecular sieves, monocyclic bifunctional oxazolidines and combinations thereof.
  • 150. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 further comprising adding a pigment.
  • 151. The method of claim 150 wherein the pigment is selected from titanium dioxide, diarylide yellow, iron oxide, raw umber, burnt umber, phthalocyanine blue, cobalt blue, chinese blue, phthalocyanine green, toluidine red, quinacridone red, dicerylide orange, carbon black, furnale black, lampblack, leafing aluminum and non-leaving aluminum.
  • 152. The single component epoxy resin precursor of claim 1 wherein the first solvent has an intermediate polar solubility parameter and an intermediate hydrogen bonding solubility parameter.
  • 153. The method of claim 23 wherein the first solvent has an intermediate polar solubility parameter and an intermediate hydrogen bonding solubility parameter.
  • 154. The method of claim 63 wherein the first solvent has an intermediate polar solubility parameter and an intermediate hydrogen bonding solubility parameter.
  • 155. The low VOC epoxy resin coating of claim 130 wherein the first solvent has an intermediate polar solubility parameter and an intermediate hydrogen bonding solubility parameter.
  • 156. The single component epoxy resin precursor of claim 1 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not the reaction product of one or more compounds containing at least one epoxy group and one or more imines having at least one amino hydrogen.
  • 157. The single component epoxy resin precursor of claim 1 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not a heterocycle-containing compound having a backbone chain selected from the group consisting of polyether, polyvinyl, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, and novalac chains and at least two heterocyclic groups of the following general formula as side chains,
  • 158. The method of claim 23 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not the reaction product of one or more compounds containing at least one epoxy group and one or more imines having at least one amino hydrogen.
  • 159. The method of claim 23 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not a heterocycle-containing compound having a backbone chain selected from the group consisting of polyether, polyvinyl, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, and novalac chains and at least two heterocyclic groups of the following general formula as side chains,
  • 160. The method of claim 63 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not the reaction product of one or more compounds containing at least one epoxy group and one or more imines having at least one amino hydrogen.
  • 161. The method of claim 63 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not a heterocycle-containing compound having a backbone chain selected from the group consisting of polyether, polyvinyl, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, and novalac chains and at least two heterocyclic groups of the following general formula as side chains,
  • 162. The method of claim 103 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not the reaction product of one or more compounds containing at least one epoxy group and one or more imines having at least one amino hydrogen.
  • 163. The method of claim 103 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not a heterocycle-containing compound having a backbone chain selected from the group consisting of polyether, polyvinyl, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, and novalac chains and at least two heterocyclic groups of the following general formula as side chains,
  • 164. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not the reaction product of one or more compounds containing at least one epoxy group and one or more imines having at least one amino hydrogen.
  • 165. The low VOC epoxy coating of claim 130 with the proviso that the blocked amine is not a heterocycle-containing compound having a backbone chain selected from the group consisting of polyether, polyvinyl, polyester, polyamide, polycarbonate, and novalac chains and at least two heterocyclic groups of the following general formula as side chains,