1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to beams that form a grid in a suspended ceiling that has panels supported on flanges of the beams.
2. Description of the Related Art
Beams used in grids for suspended ceilings of either the panel or drywall type are well known. Such beams, which are similar for both types of ceilings, have an inverted T cross section formed by continuously passing a strip of metal through rollers that fold the strip longitudinally.
The beams carry a vertical load on the flanges only. To avoid twisting and bending in tee beams under such vertical load on the flanges in suspended ceilings, beams symmetrical in cross section are used, so that the beam is loaded in the plane of the web. In the prior art, this is done with a double-layered web, having a flange cantilevered from each layer of the web, wherein the flanges oppose one another horizontally.
Beams with a single-layered web have been tried, in an attempt to produce a beam that uses less metal. In such a beam that has a single-layered web, only a single flange is cantilevered from the web. An opposing flange is cantilevered from the first formed flange. Such a beam is unbalanced under a vertical load on both flanges, and is subject to twisting and bending, since it is not loaded in the plane of the web.
In U.S. Pat. Re.31,528, incorporated herein by reference, such problems with single-layered webs are discussed with reference to FIG. 7 of the patent.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,520,609, attempts were made to balance the cross section of a single-layered web beam by adding more material to the top and bottom of the beam on opposite sides of the web.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,919, a beam having a web with a full first layer, and a partial second layer, is disclosed.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,979,055, incorporated herein by reference, a beam having a web that is formed partially of one layer, is pieced together.
Such prior art beams with a full, or partial, single-layered web were unbalanced and lacked the necessary strength and stiffness to support the loads, unless more and heavier material was used than in a double-layered web beam. This defeated the desire to use a single-layered web beam with its promise of the use of less metal to make the beam. Virtually all beams for suspended ceilings continue to have a double-layered web.
In parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/446,729, of which this application is a continuation-in-part, and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/481,374, of which this application is a continuation-in-part, there is disclosed a balanced beam for a suspended ceiling formed with a single-layered web that has one flange bent and cantilevered from the bottom of the web, and a second, opposite flange, that is cantilevered from close to the web by a seam that secures the first and second flanges together close to the web.
The seam is preferably formed by continuous stitching as the beam is being rollformed, as seen, for instance, in the '055 patent. Other forms of binding, such as spot, or continuous, welding, as well as adhesives, may be used to form the seam.
Such a beam in cross section is balanced, and acts to load the beam in the plane of the web, so that any twisting or bending in a beam having a single-layered web is substantially eliminated.
The seam also binds the flanges themselves together to produce a bottom member at the base of the single-layered web that stiffens the web itself.
Such a single-layered web beam with a seam in the flanges along the web that binds the flanges together near the bottom of web, so that both flanges are cantilevered from the web, provides the equivalent strength and rigidity of a double-layered web formed of the same thickness of strip metal, but without using a second layer of the metal in the web, so there is less metal needed to make the beam.
The present invention is directed to such a single-layered web beam capable of being used in a panel suspended panel ceiling.
Beams 20 for suspended ceilings are shown in
The vertical panel load, or vertical drywall load, on the beams in a suspended ceiling, is indicated in
The prior art beam 20 shown in
The prior art beam 20 shown in
The basic single-layered web beam 20 of the invention, as seen in
The seam 40 is preferably made as the beam is being continuously rollformed, as by stitching. A form of stitching is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. '055 cited above. A seam 40 could also be formed by continuous or spot welding, or by adhesives.
Seam 40, in effect, cantilevers the flange 23 from the single-layered web 22 of the basic beam 20 of the invention as seen for instance in
In
In
In
In
There is shown in
There is shown in
Both the prior art beam 20 as shown for instance in
The prior art two-layered web beam 20 of
The panels 70, when supported on the flanges 23 and 25 of the prior art double-layered web beam 20 as seen on the left in
As discussed above, the prior art double-layered web beam 20 is symmetrical, and balanced, and, as shown in
The beam 20′ of the invention likewise is balanced, as explained above, and shown in the drawings, since the seam 40 along the web 22′ acts to cantilever both flanges 23′ and 25′ from the web 22′, so that the total load, as shown by vector 32 in
There is a savings in metal with the balanced single-layered web beam of the invention for a panel suspended ceiling over a comparable sized prior art balanced double-layered web beam 20 as seen in
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/446,729, filed Jun. 5, 2006, for Single-Layered Web Beam For A Suspended Ceiling, and also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/481,374, filed Jul. 5, 2006, for Single-Layered Web Beam For A Drywall Suspended Ceiling.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1826133 | Hatch | Oct 1931 | A |
2065378 | Kling | Dec 1936 | A |
2092210 | Greulich | Sep 1937 | A |
2108373 | Greulich | Feb 1938 | A |
3270479 | Weinar | Sep 1966 | A |
3283467 | Znamirowski | Nov 1966 | A |
3284977 | Lickliter et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3290075 | Jahn | Dec 1966 | A |
3292332 | Jahn | Dec 1966 | A |
3319389 | Levine | May 1967 | A |
3340662 | Deinhart et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3342515 | Jahn | Sep 1967 | A |
3356402 | Smith | Dec 1967 | A |
3645051 | Kolesar | Feb 1972 | A |
3675957 | Lickliter et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3746379 | Sauer | Jul 1973 | A |
3778947 | Sauer | Dec 1973 | A |
3898784 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3903671 | Cuin et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3921346 | Sauer et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4019300 | Sauer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4041668 | Jahn et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4064671 | Sauer | Dec 1977 | A |
4084364 | Jones | Apr 1978 | A |
RE31528 | Mieyal | Mar 1984 | E |
4489529 | Ollinger et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4492066 | LaLonde | Jan 1985 | A |
4520609 | Worley et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4531340 | Sauer | Jul 1985 | A |
4554718 | Ollinger et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4713919 | Platt | Dec 1987 | A |
5979055 | Sauer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6115986 | Kelly | Sep 2000 | A |
6138416 | Platt | Oct 2000 | A |
6205733 | LaLonde | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6722098 | Platt | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7240460 | Platt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20060101763 | Dohren | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 205 673 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0 205 673 | May 1989 | GB |
Entry |
---|
See attached European Search Report (A3 Publication) Issued by European Patent Office in European Patent Application No. 07012831.9. The European Search was Completed Apr. 2, 2009, and the Publication date was May 13, 2009. |
See attached European Patent Office Communication dated Apr. 15, 2009, Accompanied by Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion, Issued in European Patent Application No. 07012831.9, and patents listed in the European Search Report. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070277468 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11446729 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 11490208 | US | |
Parent | 11481374 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 11446729 | US |