Single-layered web beam for a panel suspended ceiling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8590275
  • Patent Number
    8,590,275
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 19, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 26, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A balanced, single-layered web beam for a grid in a panel suspended ceiling, wherein opposing flanges at the bottom of the web are cantilevered directly from the bottom of the web. When the flanges are equally loaded by the panels, the resultant load on the beam passes through the vertical plane of the web, so the beam does not twist or bend.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to beams that form a grid in a suspended ceiling that has panels supported on flanges of the beams.


2. Description of the Related Art


Beams used in grids for suspended ceilings of either the panel or drywall type are well known. Such beams, which are similar for both types of ceilings, have an inverted T cross section formed by continuously passing a strip of metal through rollers that fold the strip longitudinally.


The beams carry a vertical load on the flanges only. To avoid twisting and bending in tee beams under such vertical load on the flanges in suspended ceilings, beams symmetrical in cross section are used, so that the beam is loaded in the plane of the web. In the prior art, this is done with a double-layered web, having a flange cantilevered from each layer of the web, wherein the flanges oppose one another horizontally.


Beams with a single-layered web have been tried, in an attempt to produce a beam that uses less metal. In such a beam that has a single-layered web, only a single flange is cantilevered from the web. An opposing flange is cantilevered from the first formed flange. Such a beam is unbalanced under a vertical load on both flanges, and is subject to twisting and bending, since it is not loaded in the plane of the web.


In U.S. Pat. Re.31,528, incorporated herein by reference, such problems with single-layered webs are discussed with reference to FIG. 7 of the patent.


In U.S. Pat. No. 4,520,609, attempts were made to balance the cross section of a single-layered web beam by adding more material to the top and bottom of the beam on opposite sides of the web.


In U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,919, a beam having a web with a full first layer, and a partial second layer, is disclosed.


In U.S. Pat. No. 5,979,055, incorporated herein by reference, a beam having a web that is formed partially of one layer, is pieced together.


Such prior art beams with a full, or partial, single-layered web were unbalanced and lacked the necessary strength and stiffness to support the loads, unless more and heavier material was used than in a double-layered web beam. This defeated the desire to use a single-layered web beam with its promise of the use of less metal to make the beam. Virtually all beams for suspended ceilings continue to have a double-layered web.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/446,729, of which this application is a continuation-in-part, and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/481,374, of which this application is a continuation-in-part, there is disclosed a balanced beam for a suspended ceiling formed with a single-layered web that has one flange bent and cantilevered from the bottom of the web, and a second, opposite flange, that is cantilevered from close to the web by a seam that secures the first and second flanges together close to the web.


The seam is preferably formed by continuous stitching as the beam is being rollformed, as seen, for instance, in the '055 patent. Other forms of binding, such as spot, or continuous, welding, as well as adhesives, may be used to form the seam.


Such a beam in cross section is balanced, and acts to load the beam in the plane of the web, so that any twisting or bending in a beam having a single-layered web is substantially eliminated.


The seam also binds the flanges themselves together to produce a bottom member at the base of the single-layered web that stiffens the web itself.


Such a single-layered web beam with a seam in the flanges along the web that binds the flanges together near the bottom of web, so that both flanges are cantilevered from the web, provides the equivalent strength and rigidity of a double-layered web formed of the same thickness of strip metal, but without using a second layer of the metal in the web, so there is less metal needed to make the beam.


The present invention is directed to such a single-layered web beam capable of being used in a panel suspended panel ceiling.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a partial perspective view of the basic single-layered web beam of the invention, taken from above.



FIG. 2 is a partial perspective view of the beam of FIG. 1, taken from below.



FIG. 3 is a cross sectional view of a prior art beam with a double-layered web.



FIG. 4 is a cross sectional view of a prior art beam with a single-layered web.



FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of the beam of FIGS. 1 and 2.



FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIG. 1 showing a single-layered web beam adapted for use in a panel suspended ceiling.



FIG. 7 is the beam of FIG. 6 shown in a partial perspective view from below, similar to the view in FIG. 2.



FIG. 8 is a cross sectional view of a prior art beam used in a panel ceiling.



FIG. 9 is a cross section of the beam of the invention adapted for a panel suspended ceiling.



FIG. 10 is a partial cross sectional view of a panel suspended ceiling, showing the prior art beam of FIG. 8, and the beam of the invention adapted for use in a panel suspended ceiling, supporting panels on flanges of the beam.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Beams 20 for suspended ceilings are shown in FIGS. 1 through 5. Such beams include the prior art beams shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, and the single-layered beam of the invention shown in FIGS. 1, 2, and 5. Beams 20 have a bulb 21 at the top of a web 22. Opposing flanges 23 and 25 extend horizontally away from the web at the bottom of the beam. Stitching 24 is sometimes used to secure layers of web 22 together.


The vertical panel load, or vertical drywall load, on the beams in a suspended ceiling, is indicated in FIGS. 3 through 5 by vectors 26 and 27 that represent the amount, location, and direction of the load exerted by the panels or drywall in a suspended ceiling. The load on each flange of the prior art beams is shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, and on the beam of the invention 20 shown in FIG. 5.


The prior art beam 20 shown in FIG. 3 has a two-layered web 22, with each of the flanges 23 and 25 cantilevered from one of the layers of the web 22. The beam is symmetrical, and hence balanced, in cross section.


The prior art beam 20 shown in FIG. 4 has a single-layered web 22 with a flange 25 cantilevered from the bottom of the web 22, to the right, and then a second opposing flange 23 cantilevered from flange 25 at location 29, in a direction to the left.


The basic single-layered web beam 20 of the invention, as seen in FIGS. 1, 2, and 5, has a single-layered web 22, with the flanges formed as in the prior art beam 20 of FIG. 4. The basic single-layered web beam of the invention as seen for instance in FIGS. 1, 2, and 5, also has a seam 40 that runs longitudinally along the web 22 of the beam, that binds flanges 23 and 25 together, so that flange 23 is cantilevered from flange 25 along web 22.


The seam 40 is preferably made as the beam is being continuously rollformed, as by stitching. A form of stitching is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. '055 cited above. A seam 40 could also be formed by continuous or spot welding, or by adhesives.


Seam 40, in effect, cantilevers the flange 23 from the single-layered web 22 of the basic beam 20 of the invention as seen for instance in FIGS. 1, 2, and 5, so that the result is a balanced beam that is loaded through the plane of the single-layered web 22. Such basic beam 20 of the invention resists twisting and bending to an extent equivalent to that of a double-layered web beam of a comparable size made of the same thickness metal strip, as seen for instance in FIG. 3. The beam of the invention however, uses less metal.


In FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 of the drawings, the loading of the beams 20, both prior art and of the invention, is shown through the use of vectors.


In FIG. 3, load vectors 26 and 27 represent the vertical loading on each of the flanges 23 and 25 of a double-layered prior beam 20, in either a panel or drywall suspended ceiling. The resultant load vector 30 of vectors 26 and 27 of such prior art double-layered web beam passes through the plane of web 22, since the beam is balanced. Such balanced beam creates a maximum resistance to bending and twisting.


In FIG. 4, there is shown the single-layered beam of the prior art. Again, as in FIG. 3, the vectors 26 and 27 represent the loads applied to the beams, either through panel, or drywall, loads. However, because of the beam construction wherein flange 23 is cantilevered from flange 25 at location 29, the resultant load vector 31 is shown applied at a distance away from the single-layered web, resulting in an unbalanced beam subject to bending and twisting that is not present in the balanced beam of FIG. 3.


In FIG. 5, which shows the basic single-layered web beam 20 of the invention, again, as in the prior art, the beam 20 is vertically loaded on the flanges 23 and 25, in the suspended ceiling, as shown by vectors 26 and 27. However, seam 40 binds flange 23 to flange 27 along web 22, so that in effect both flanges 23 and 25 are cantilevered from web 22, resulting in a balanced beam. Load resultant 32 passes through the plane of the web, so that the single-layered beam of the invention resists twisting and bending equivalent to a comparably sized two-layered web beam 20, as seen in FIG. 3, but with the use of less metal.


There is shown in FIG. 8, and in part of FIG. 10, for use in a panel suspended ceiling, a prior art beam having a two-layered web, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,138,416 for instance, incorporated herein by reference.


There is shown in FIGS. 6, 7, 9, and in part of FIG. 10, the basic single-layered web beam of the invention adapted for use in a panel suspended ceiling. Such beam is designated 20′.


Both the prior art beam 20 as shown for instance in FIGS. 8 and 10, and the beam 20′ of the invention in FIGS. 6, 7, 9, and 10, have a bulb 21 or 21′, a web 22 or 22′, and opposing flanges 23 and 25, or 23′ and 25′, as well as a bottom cap 59 extending over the bottom of the flanges 23 and 25, or 23′ and 25′. Such cap 59 is well-known in the prior art.


The prior art two-layered web beam 20 of FIG. 8 is sometimes stitched together at 67, longitudinally of the web 22.


The panels 70, when supported on the flanges 23 and 25 of the prior art double-layered web beam 20 as seen on the left in FIG. 10, exert a vertical downward load, as shown by vectors 26 and 27 in FIG. 3. The panels 70, when supported on the flanges 23′ and 25′ of the single-layered web beam 20′ for a panel suspended ceiling, as seen on the right in FIG. 10, also exert a vertical downward load, as shown by vectors 26 and 27 in FIG. 5.


As discussed above, the prior art double-layered web beam 20 is symmetrical, and balanced, and, as shown in FIG. 3, the total load 30 on the beam, which is the sum of the loads 26 and 27 exerted on each flange, passes through the plane of the web 22, with a minimum of bending and twisting on the beam 20.


The beam 20′ of the invention likewise is balanced, as explained above, and shown in the drawings, since the seam 40 along the web 22′ acts to cantilever both flanges 23′ and 25′ from the web 22′, so that the total load, as shown by vector 32 in FIG. 5, passes through the plane of the web 22′. Since the load is balanced in the beam 20′ of the invention adapted for a panel suspended ceiling, there is a minimum of twisting and bending on the beam 20′ from the downward loads of the panels 70.


There is a savings in metal with the balanced single-layered web beam of the invention for a panel suspended ceiling over a comparable sized prior art balanced double-layered web beam 20 as seen in FIGS. 8 and 10.

Claims
  • 1. In a beam for a grid in a panel suspended ceiling, formed from a single layer of metal folded longitudinally into a cross section having (a) a bulb at the top,(b) a single-layered web extending downwardly from the bulb,(c) a first and second flange at the bottom of the web, each of which extends horizontally on the opposite side of the web from the other flange, with the first flange formed of an upper and lower layer of metal, the upper layer of which extends from the bottom of the web, and the second flange formed of at least a single layer of metal extending from the lower layer of the first flange; and(d) a cap over the bottom of the flanges;
  • 2. The beam of claim 1, wherein the binding is formed by a seam of stitches.
  • 3. The beam of claim 1, wherein the binding stiffens the web.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/446,729, filed Jun. 5, 2006, for Single-Layered Web Beam For A Suspended Ceiling, and also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/481,374, filed Jul. 5, 2006, for Single-Layered Web Beam For A Drywall Suspended Ceiling.

US Referenced Citations (38)
Number Name Date Kind
1826133 Hatch Oct 1931 A
2065378 Kling Dec 1936 A
2092210 Greulich Sep 1937 A
2108373 Greulich Feb 1938 A
3270479 Weinar Sep 1966 A
3283467 Znamirowski Nov 1966 A
3284977 Lickliter et al. Nov 1966 A
3290075 Jahn Dec 1966 A
3292332 Jahn Dec 1966 A
3319389 Levine May 1967 A
3340662 Deinhart et al. Sep 1967 A
3342515 Jahn Sep 1967 A
3356402 Smith Dec 1967 A
3645051 Kolesar Feb 1972 A
3675957 Lickliter et al. Jul 1972 A
3746379 Sauer Jul 1973 A
3778947 Sauer Dec 1973 A
3898784 Sauer et al. Aug 1975 A
3903671 Cuin et al. Sep 1975 A
3921346 Sauer et al. Nov 1975 A
4019300 Sauer et al. Apr 1977 A
4041668 Jahn et al. Aug 1977 A
4064671 Sauer Dec 1977 A
4084364 Jones Apr 1978 A
RE31528 Mieyal Mar 1984 E
4489529 Ollinger et al. Dec 1984 A
4492066 LaLonde Jan 1985 A
4520609 Worley et al. Jun 1985 A
4531340 Sauer Jul 1985 A
4554718 Ollinger et al. Nov 1985 A
4713919 Platt Dec 1987 A
5979055 Sauer et al. Nov 1999 A
6115986 Kelly Sep 2000 A
6138416 Platt Oct 2000 A
6205733 LaLonde Mar 2001 B1
6722098 Platt Apr 2004 B2
7240460 Platt Jul 2007 B2
20060101763 Dohren May 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 205 673 Dec 1986 EP
0 205 673 May 1989 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
See attached European Search Report (A3 Publication) Issued by European Patent Office in European Patent Application No. 07012831.9. The European Search was Completed Apr. 2, 2009, and the Publication date was May 13, 2009.
See attached European Patent Office Communication dated Apr. 15, 2009, Accompanied by Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion, Issued in European Patent Application No. 07012831.9, and patents listed in the European Search Report.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070277468 A1 Dec 2007 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11446729 Jun 2006 US
Child 11490208 US
Parent 11481374 Jul 2006 US
Child 11446729 US