The present invention relates generally to the field of less lethal munitions and, more particularly to a single piece non-lethal projectile for a training version of the less lethal munition.
Less lethal munitions utilized by law enforcement and military forces requires the need to regularly train in the use of these munitions to achieve and maintain proficiency in their deployment. For example, less lethal impact munitions which impart blunt energy to redirect, control, or incapacitate aggressive human targets, depend on accurate shot placement to achieve the desired outcome while minimizing the risk of serious injury. As with any munition fired from a firearm or launcher, accurate and consistent shot placement is only achieved through repetitive training with the actual munitions or realistic training variance.
With the increased use of impact munitions by law enforcement and military forces, as well as the increased numbers of those forces, there is a need for a cost-effective training munition that matches the performance of the actual munition while allowing the user to easily reload and re-use the training munition in the field. One way to decrease the cost of training munition is to design the projectile to be re-used multiple times. This is best accomplished by fabricating the projectile from a high impact polymer material that will withstand repeated firings and impacts without shattering. The cost is further reduced if the projectile can be molded as a single piece in high volume.
Various types of non-lethal munitions have been marketed and sold that have projectiles consisting of multiple components of different densities. This is done to allow tougher, heavier materials to be used on the parts of the projectile that must engage the barrel riffling, and to control the projectile center of gravity. To minimize the risk of injury due to blunt impact, the nose materials used in non-lethal projectiles are typically lower density rubber or foam materials which will deform upon impact with the target. A higher density base and a lower density nose combination are desirable for maximizing the gyroscopic stability and mask properties of a spin-stabilized projectile. Other training and reload kits have been marketed and sold that involve reloading munition projectiles into reloaded shell bases. This results in performance approximating the actual munition trajectory, but only minor cost savings due to the single-use projectile.
Consequently, a need exists for an inexpensive, single piece, reusable projectile that accurately reproduces the aerodynamic, flight stability and mass properties of current non-lethal projectiles, thereby producing an accurate representation of a non-lethal projectile trajectory for training purposes.
The present invention is directed to a reusable training munition having a reusable, single piece projectile that accurately reproduces the aerodynamic and mass properties of actual fielded projectiles for use as training munitions. Significant cost savings are achieved through a one piece, design while still maintaining the performance of the projectile. The projectile of the present invention closely simulates weight, flight stability and aerodynamic characteristics of an actual munition projectile, but utilizing materials and manufacturing techniques to reduce the cost and allow the projectile to be re-used numerous times without loss of performance during training exercises. The projectile of the present invention is a single-piece molded projectile having voids or cavities to simulate the mass properties of current non-lethal rounds.
As shown in
The reusable shell base 14 has the same internal and external dimensions as a single use shell base to preserve the interface and fit with the projectile and the weapon platform. The reusable shell base incorporates a hollow cavity 22 in the bottom of the shell which accepts the reload insert 16. The internal diameter of the hollow cavity is designed with sufficient tolerance to allow the reload insert to be loaded or removed by hand. The reload insert 16 houses a blank cartridge 24 and a rupture disk 26. The reload insert also has a vent hole 28 as seen best in
To retain the reload insert within the reusable shell base, a mechanical attachment means is incorporated. For example, a threaded hole 30 extends from the external surface of the shell to the longitudinal axis of the shell and intersecting the hollow cavity 22. A set screw 32 is threaded into the hole and can be tightened to move the screw towards the hollow cavity and engage the reload insert. Consequently, when a reload insert is in place in the hollow cavity and the set screw tightened, the set screw provides a mechanical means of securing the reload insert into the reusable shell base. When the set screw is loosened, the reload insert can be easily removed by hand with simple hand tools such as an Allen wrench.
As shown in
Another mechanical means of retention could be designed into the interface between the reload insert and the shell base such as steps or grooves that could lock the reload insert in place when it is inserted and turned in the shell base. A locking groove system would incorporate a reload with features that are keyed to the same pattern as the opening of the shell base, the keyed feature is positioned axially on the reload to align with a radial groove on the interior of the shell cavity. The reload is inserted until the keyed feature and the groove align, and then rotated to lock the reload in place. Still another mechanical means of retaining the propulsion system reload can be an O-ring interface between the propulsion system reload and the interior surface of the hollow cavity and the shell base. The O-ring could be located either in a groove on the external surface of the propulsion system reload, meeting with the groove on the internal surface of the hollow cavity in the shell base, or vice versa, wherein the O-ring is located in a groove on the internal surface of the hollow cavity of the shell base and mates with a groove on the surface of the propulsion system reload.
Referring now to
As shown in
An additional advantage of the embodiment of the present invention involves the airflow into the cylindrical voids and cavities that are positioned parallel to the longitudinal axis of rotation as they produce stagnation areas on the spinning projectile, allowing generation of a turbulent boundary layer along the surface of the projectile nose. This turbulent layer is similar to that produced by dimples on the surface of a golf ball, and the drag reduction translates into less velocity drop over the flight trajectory. The projectile also includes an angled end surface 68 to increase stability of the projectile, the angled surface 68 being located on the end of the neck portion 20.
Although the present invention has been illustrated with respect to several embodiments therefore, it is not to be so limited since changes and modifications can be made which are within the intended scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/077,644 filed Jul. 2, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
228494 | Valentine | Jun 1880 | A |
1526701 | Fahrenwald | Feb 1925 | A |
2112758 | Blacker | Mar 1938 | A |
3326133 | Stadler et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3650213 | Abbott et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3714896 | Young | Feb 1973 | A |
3732821 | Royer | May 1973 | A |
3791303 | Sweeney et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3865038 | Barr | Feb 1975 | A |
4164903 | Bouza | Aug 1979 | A |
4208968 | Hubsch et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4603637 | Snide et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
5009164 | Grinberg | Apr 1991 | A |
5035183 | Luxton | Jul 1991 | A |
5086703 | Klein | Feb 1992 | A |
5225628 | Heiny | Jul 1993 | A |
5237930 | Bélanger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239928 | Ricci | Aug 1993 | A |
5259319 | Dravecky et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5402729 | Richert | Apr 1995 | A |
5665808 | Bilsbury et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691501 | Gilbert | Nov 1997 | A |
5936190 | Buzick | Aug 1999 | A |
6041712 | Lyon | Mar 2000 | A |
6186072 | Hickerson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6230630 | Gibson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6439123 | Dionne et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494069 | Ireblad et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6543365 | Vasel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6615739 | Gibson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6832557 | Torsten | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6990905 | Manole et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7086337 | Klein | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089863 | Dindl | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7143699 | Brock et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7173540 | Daigle et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7207276 | Dindl | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7228802 | Montefusco | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7287475 | Brunn | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7337725 | Queiroz de Aguiar | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350465 | Keegstra et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7503260 | Kapeles | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20040069177 | Klein | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050268808 | Werner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060225600 | Skellern et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070151473 | Brunn | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070234891 | Puskas et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 8300213 | Jan 1983 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120210903 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61077644 | Jul 2008 | US |