The invention relates to roofing systems of the type secured to generally flat roof decks and comprised of flexible synthetic membranes with overlapped and bonded edges.
Single-ply membrane sheet roofing systems are very well recognized and widely in use as both new and renovated exterior roof surfaces for a multiplicity of building structures having generally flat roof decks. Such deck sheets today are custom prefabricated in the factory by Duro-Last, Inc., applicant's assignee, to the exact dimensions of the building roof and furnished, with weight considerations in mind, in rolled transportable sections of up to 2500 square feet to the roofer on site. Other single-ply roofs are largely worker-constructed at the site and bonded by the roofer on the site. Presently, in the case of Duro-Last, Inc. up to eighty-five percent of the field seams can be completed in the factory under ideal factory conditions, eliminating waste, saving labor, and preventing leaks. A number of such roofing systems are utilized for large footprint roofs, such as factories, administrative buildings, schools, and office buildings, for example. The present invention is concerned with improvements which are particularly suited to the more difficult-to-install systems where the number of necessary fasteners utilized, from the standpoint of labor cost, must be kept to a minimum, while still effectively performing their function.
The present invention is directed to a combination of a first membrane with a longitudinally extending free edge secured to a roof deck by fasteners and a second membrane with an edge portion overlapping the first membrane edge and factory weld-bonded to the first membrane by means of a continuous bond between the substantially very edge of the second membrane so that the first membrane edge projects forwardly from the bond to define a fastening projection or tab extending forwardly upon the roof deck.
When the second membrane is peeled upwardly, back from the bond and fastening projection, the fasteners are placed along the fastening projection to secure the fastening projection of the first membrane to the deck. With the second membrane still in peeled-back position, a fast-drying adhesive is applied over the fastening edge and fastener, from the factory bond forwardly, and provides a continuous adhesive coating from the first membrane projection over the fasteners and fastening tab or projection. Thus, a continuous monolithic bond, including the factory bond, and extending forwardly over and beyond the fastening tab and fasteners is provided in the preferred system illustrated. When the second membrane (which also preferably has its underside appropriately coated with the same adhesive) is lowered to cover the fastening projection and the deck forwardly thereof, a substantially continuous layer of material, created by the factory welding and on site adhesive coating, provides in conjunction with the mechanical fasteners a novel monolithic joint or seam.
One of the prime objects of the invention is to provide a roofing system which is exceptionally resistant to wind up-lift forces in areas of the country in which wind forces are particularly strong and hazardous to roofs.
Another object of the injection is to provide a membrane system in which the fasteners used need not be of the barbed character presently in wide use for gripping the membrane to resist wind up-lift forces.
Another object of the invention is to provide a labor-saving installation requiring a reduced number of fasteners when the roof deck is a difficult structure to roof (such as concrete) which must be drilled to receive the fasteners and is labor and cost intensive.
Another object of the invention is to provide an inexpensive, mechanically secured single-ply roofing system which is extremely durable under a wide range of wind conditions and in a variety of climates.
Another object of the invention is to provide an economically installed single-ply roofing system of reliable sealed quality which is manufactured in substantial part in the factory to ensure quality control in a sheltered working environment with specially trained employees.
Another object of the invention is to provide equal-lateral pull resistance over the fastener lap, thus uniformly spreading up-lift load through the fasteners into the deck.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The preferred embodiments disclosed herein are disclosed by way of example and not intended in any way to restrict the language of the claims which follow.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent in view of the following detailed description, appended claims and accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now more particularly to the accompanying drawings, it should be understood that the roofing system, generally designated RS, and secured on roof deck D is comprised of a series of membranes, generally designated M, which are factory welded along their lapped edges to form the multiple membrane sheet, generally designated S. In
As shown in
The sheet S, comprised of multiple membranes M, welded in the manner disclosed in the factory, can be supplied to the roofer in rolled sheets of, for example, 2500 square feet in the weld bonded condition shown in
The roof deck D can be comprised of many known surfaces or substrates, such as concrete, wood, asphalt, coal tar, steel, cement, wood fiber and the like, and, for purposes of illustration oly, is shown in
Once the fastener members 13 are secured in position with a suitable rotary power tool, a roller applicator or roller brush, generally designated B, having a handle H, may be used to apply a fast-drying liquid adhesive to the surface of the fastening projection or tab 10a, defined by the welded edge, 2b, forwardly and across the fastening projection 10a to provide a coating 17 (
As indicated previously, not only is the strip S securely fastened in position mechanically by the fastener members 13 extending through each fastening projection 10a, a substantially continuous monolithic bond is formed by the “factory” weld bond 12 and the “field” adhesive coating 17 to interact with the fasteners F and prevent wind lift-up forces from applying unevenly and cocking the securing fastener system F in a manner to tear the membrane. While various suitable fast-drying liquid adhesives are possible, one such adhesive which will work to secure the membranes in the field is manufactured by Sovereign Specialty Chemicals of Cincinnati, Ohio. With the present system the number of fasteners F which need be used to secure the sheet S in terms of resisting wind up-lift is considerably fewer. Resistance to membrane tearing, and membrane peeling particularly, is greatly increased and any tendency to pull the fasteners F up at cocked angles rather than straight up is considerably reduced by this monolithic structure.
Typically the membranes used may be forty mil membranes, with the membrane consisting of polyester fabric cores coated on each side with polyvinyl chloride or another thermoplastic. Duro-Last, Inc. of Saginaw, Mich., produces highly suitable membranes of this character. Various other roofing membrane sheets, including synthetic rubbers or elastomers such as EPDM and CPE, or others which may be classified as thermoplastic synthetic resins or polymers and are flexible, are believed also suited. While a membrane thickness of 0.040 inches is normal, the membrane size may, for example, be anywhere in the neighborhood of 0.030 to 0.080 in thickness, and may contain various reinforcing materials in the form of fibers or fabrics.
It should be understood that the foregoing disclosure of the invention is descriptive only of preferred forms thereof, and that the spirit and scope of the invention are to be limited only by the terms of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2176344 | Hunt | Oct 1939 | A |
3505770 | Bennett | Apr 1970 | A |
4424650 | Van Note | Jan 1984 | A |
4441295 | Kelly | Apr 1984 | A |
4450663 | Watkins | May 1984 | A |
4493175 | Coppola, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4546589 | Seaman | Oct 1985 | A |
4671036 | Sullivan | Jun 1987 | A |
4707961 | Nunley et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4726164 | Reinwall et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4747241 | Whitman | May 1988 | A |
4787188 | Murphy | Nov 1988 | A |
4855172 | Chiu | Aug 1989 | A |
4860514 | Kelly | Aug 1989 | A |
4885887 | Simmons et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4977720 | Kuipers | Dec 1990 | A |
4996803 | Karrfalt et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018329 | Hasan et al. | May 1991 | A |
5031374 | Batch et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5165210 | Partyka et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171116 | Gerhardt et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5204148 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5737897 | Naipawer, III | Apr 1998 | A |
5772816 | Hubbard | Jun 1998 | A |
5797232 | Larson | Aug 1998 | A |
5800891 | Wasitis | Sep 1998 | A |
5803693 | Choiniere et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829214 | Hart | Nov 1998 | A |
5930969 | Mayle et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6004645 | Hubbard | Dec 1999 | A |
6021616 | Mayle | Feb 2000 | A |
6055786 | Hubbard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6233889 | Hulsey | May 2001 | B1 |
6238502 | Hubbard | May 2001 | B1 |
6250034 | Hulsey | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6378259 | Carlson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427412 | Mayle et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6502360 | Carr et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6537402 | Pate et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6640511 | Link | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6689449 | Hasan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6742313 | Ritland et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764260 | Nebesnak et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769215 | Carkner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6857243 | Bloomfield | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875162 | Barksdale et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020095898 | Bettencourt | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040002414 | Barksdale et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040187420 | Bernardi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187422 | Bernardi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040238097 | Swann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050066621 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |