Single sheet of paper for duplicating information entered on both surfaces thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6280322
  • Patent Number
    6,280,322
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 27, 1995
    29 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 28, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
Improvements to self-replicating duplex forms are disclosed. Generally, a single sheet of paper is divided into original and copy panels by fold line, and carbonless coatings are applied to the panels so that information entered on the two, front and back surfaces of the original panel are reproduced on the two surfaces of the copy panel. An endorsable carbonless CB coating is applied to the original panel, either at the mill or on-press. A carbonless CF coating is applied to the copy panel so that the coated copy panel is substantially the same thickness as the coated original panel. Specific areas for filling out information on the original panel are offset, from front-to-back, and methods of checking this offset are disclosed.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates to methods and apparatus for replicating information entered on both sides of a single sheet of paper, especially carbonless copying techniques.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Carbonless copy forms are well known. A typical two-part form is a “manifold” (many part) construction including a top sheet having a coated back (CB) containing microencapsulated (generally colorless) dye, and a bottom sheet having a coated front (CF) containing a reactive dye-revealing substance. The top and bottom sheets are assembled, such as by gluing, into a “manifold”, or many part set, which typically has a “stub”. The pressure of writing on the front surface of the top sheet causes the microcapsules on the CB-coated back surface of the top sheet to rupture, releasing dye onto the CF-coated front surface of the bottom sheet, whereupon the writing is revealed in a contrasting (visible) color on the front surface of the bottom sheet.




Multiple carbonless copies are produced in a similar manner. One or more intermediate sheets are assembled (in the manifold assembly) between the CB top and CF bottom sheets. Each intermediate sheet has a carbonless front (CF) coating on its front surface for revealing the (CB) dye from the previous sheet, and has a carbonless back (CB) coating on its back surface for releasing dye to the CF-coated surface of the next sheet in the set. The intermediate sheets are termed “CFB” sheets. Using these techniques, one or more carbonless copies of information entered on the front surface of the original (top) sheet can be reproduced on the front surface of the copy (intermediate and bottom) sheets.




The chemistry of the CB (image-transferring) and CF (imagerevealing) coatings is well known, as are techniques for applying these coatings to paper stock. Generally, in order for a reaction between a CF coating and a CB coating to occur, they must be from a “common” reaction system. These coatings and techniques include various coatings applied to paper stock at the mill, as it is being produced, and coatings applied later (typically during the printing process) to plain paper stock. OPAS (On Press Application System) coatings offered by Mead Corporation are an example of the latter.




One well known variation of the two part CB/CF chemistry is the “Self-Contained” (“SC”) coating. The SC coating is essentially a mixture of CB and CF, and is applied to the front surface of an underlying sheet for autogenously revealing an image of writing on the front surface of an overlying, un-coated sheet, in response to pressure rupturing micro-encapsulated (typically the CB) constituents.




Another coating is a “transfer-onto-plain-paper” coating, wherein the back side of the overlying sheet is coated and the front surface of the underlying sheet is not coated. Since this type of coating functions in conjunction with plain paper, in an autogenous manner similar to SC, but is applied to the overlying versus underlying sheet, it can be termed “anti-SC”. U.S. Pat. No. 4,352,855 discloses such a “transfer-onto-plain-paper” coating.




A variation of the single sided carbonless form is found in so-called “two-way write” systems. One such example is found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,000,916, issued to Lucas, which describes a manifold report form having three superimposed record sheets (top, middle and bottom). Carbon sheets and protective sheets are arranged between the record sheets. Information entered on the front surface of the top record sheet is reproduced on the front surfaces of the middle and bottom sheets. The form is then flipped over, in its entirety, and various carbon and protective sheets are removed. Information entered on the back surface of the bottom sheet is reproduced on the back surface of the middle and top sheets.




With such two-way write systems, a true original is not formed. Rather, each of the top and bottom sheets contains “original” (e.g., hand written) information on only one surface, and “copy” (reproduced by carbon paper or the CB/CF dye reaction) information on the other surface. Such a “bifurcation” of the original information is unsuitable in many applications, such as for legal forms.




For a “true-original”, two-sided self-replicating form, the top sheet would have original writing on both sides, and additional sheets would have copy images in both sides. A “true-original” is often required in legal documents, and the like.




An early example of a true-original system is found in U.S. Pat. No. 2,802,678 (Bright; 1957), wherein several sheets, interleaved carbon papers and interleaved guard sheets are employed. This patent also discloses an alternate configuration of the sheets wherein a “two-way rite” manifold assembly is produced.




Another example of a true-original system is U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,981,523, 4,036,511, RE 30,041 and RE 30,116 (Maalouf), which employ separate, non-manifolded carbonless-coated sheets.




Another example of a true-original type system is found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,126,334 (Van Malderghem), which discloses a manifold assembly of three sheets. Information is entered on one side of a top sheet, and is imaged onto corresponding one sides of an intermediate and bottom sheet. The intermediate sheet is removed from the assembly, the top sheet is flipped over, and information entered on the opposite side of the top sheet is imaged onto the corresponding opposite side of the bottom sheet.




Additional examples of “two-way rite” and “true-original” manifold form assemblies are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,715,620 and 4,762,342, issued to Thompson, and are discussed in greater detail hereinbelow. As with Van malderghem, the examples set forth in the Thompson patents are also manifold assemblies, and rely on flipping the top sheet over a stub for entering information on the opposite side of the top sheet.




U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,715,620 and 4,762,342, issued to Thompson, attempt to solve the challenge of providing a “true” original where the top sheet has “original” information on the front and back surfaces thereof. Therein, top, intermediate and bottom sheets are joined in a manifold assembly having a stub. Patterned carbon papers and/or carbonless coatings are employed, between the various sheets, as in the two-way write systems. Information is entered on the front surface of the top sheet. The top sheet is then “flipped” (repositioned) around the stub so that its front surface is in contact with the back surface of the bottom sheet. Additional information is then entered on the exposed back surface of the top sheet. The front surface of the top sheet is coated with carbonless CB and the back surface of the bottom sheet is coated with carbonless CF so that the information entered on the back surface of the top sheet is reproduced on the back surface of the bottom sheet.




Using Thompson's techniques, it is extremely difficult to maintain registration (alignment) of the top sheet when it is flipped around the stub. Hence, it is suggested by Thompson that the stub be “gently folded over” along with the top sheet. This causes a gap between the top sheet and bottom sheet, which is inapposite to carbonless image forming. The top sheet, when folded over the stub in this manner, must be smoothed out prior to entering the additional information on the back surface of the top sheet. Additionally, if the stub is not folded properly, the top sheet will not be in register with the other sheets when it is flipped over for entering information on the back surface thereof.




The implementation of all of the above-described manifold assemblies (forms) is further complicated by the need for machinery necessary to collate, glue and/or staple individual, dissimilarly coated sheets of paper, carbon papers and protective sheets into a manifold arrangement. This necessitates costly set up charges for the equipment, creates delays in going from paper stock to preprinted form, and creates cumbersome inventory requirements.




Generally, any of the techniques of employing a manifold form assembly for either “two-way rite” or “true-original” systems are limited in utility in that 1) if the top sheet is to be repositioned, it is extremely difficult to maintain registration (alignment) when a stub of any kind is involved; 2) they are generally formed of many sheets of different paper stock, and require collating and assembling at the end of the production line; and 3) they are generally not very user-friendly.




The aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183 discloses the “genesis” of two-sided (or duplex) copying of both sides of an original form, wherein an original part (portion) of a single sheet has information entered, such as by pen, on both sides thereof, which information is replicated on both sides of a copy part (portion) of the same single sheet. Techniques for effecting this result using carbon paper and carbonless coatings are disclosed therein.




The aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189 discloses further techniques for effecting two-sided copying with a single sheet of paper, using carbonless coatings, and discloses techniques for “patterning” the carbonless coatings, and discloses techniques for making more than one copy of information entered on both sides of an original portion (panel) of a single sheet of paper.




The aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686 discloses a technique wherein a single sheet of paper is divided into three panels: an original panel which is void of any carbonless coating; a copy panel which is coated with carbonless CF (image revealing) on both sides; and an intermediate transfer panel which is coated with carbonless CB (image transferring) on both sides.




The aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/494,565 discloses various techniques of patterning coatings on a single sheet of paper to avoid writing in coated areas.




The aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/497,219 discloses techniques for making two copies of information entered on both sides of an original portion of a single sheet of paper, without patterning, employing two dissimilar carbonless systems (i.e., the CB from a one system is not reactive with the CF from another system, and vice-versa).




Although all of the aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. Patent Applications disclose techniques for making duplex (two-sided) carbonless copies, using a single sheet of paper, certain improvements to those techniques have been developed by the inventors thereof.




DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION




It is a general object of the present invention to provide improvements in self-replicating duplex forms.




It is a further object of the invention to provide improved coating techniques for self-replicating duplex forms.




It is a further object of the invention to provide improved “user-friendliness” in self-replicating duplex forms.




It is a further object of the present invention to provide improved manufacturing techniques for self-replicating duplex forms.




It is a further object of the invention to provide improved coating arrangements for self-replicating duplex forms.




It is further object of the present invention to provide improved physical configurations for self-replicating duplex forms.




It is further object of the present invention to provide improved end uses for self-replicating duplex forms.




Additionally, as set forth in the above-referenced commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538:




It is a further object of the invention to provide a single sheet, non-manifolded, two-way rite system.




It is a further object of the invention to provide improved techniques for making two or more copies in either a true-original or two-way rite system.




SUMMARY OF PARENT CASES




By way of summary, according to the inventions disclosed in the parent cases, a single sheet of paper is divided (delineated) by fold lines into two or more panels (portions), one of which serves as an “original” panel for entering information on both sides thereof, another of which serves as a “copy” panel for reproducing the information entered on both the front and back surfaces of the original panel.




Providing a “set” of carbonless papers, consisting of an original coated on both sides with carbonless CB and a copy coated on both sides with carbonless CF is also disclosed.




Substantially fully coating the original panel with carbonless CB on both sides is also disclosed.




Patterning the CB coating on the original panel to leave areas clear of CB coating (which, with some CB coatings tends to clog pens) for entering information on the original panel, and offsetting the clear areas, from front-to-back on the original panel, is disclosed.




Methods and apparatus for ensuring a front-to-back offset of areas for entering information on the front and back surfaces of the original panel are disclosed.




The use of Self-Contained (SC) coatings is disclosed.




Providing self-replicating duplex forms as a single sheet of paper is generally emphasized.




Dividing (delineating) a single sheet into three panels by two fold lines is disclosed—an original panel for entering information on both sides thereof, and devoid of any coatings; a copy panel, coated on both sides with carbonless CF, for reproducing the information on both sides thereof, and an intermediate transfer panel, coated on both sides with carbonless CB, for effecting reproduction from the original to the copy panels. Alternatively, the intermediate transfer panel is formed from a separate sheet of paper, and may be coated on only one side thereof with carbonless CB.




The original panel is preferably white, and the copy panel is preferably tinted a dissimilar color, such as pink. With mill stock, the pink tint is usually in the paper stock itself. If employed, the intermediate transfer panel is preferably dissimilarly colored from either of the original or copy panels. According to the present invention, the copy panel can be tinted any contrasting (from white), including light green.




Throughout the various embodiments described in the parent cases, and in the present disclosure, the fold lines are preferably perforated to facilitate folding the various panels one way for filling out variable information on one side (“face”, or “Side


1


”) of the original panel, the other way for filling out variable information on the other side (“back”, or “Side


2


”) of the original panel, and to facilitate separating the various panels after they are completely filled out (i.e., on both sides).




As used herein, a sheet of paper has two sides, or surfaces—namely a front surface and a back surface. Similarly, the original and copy panels themselves have two surfaces—a front surface and a back surface.




Furthermore, throughout the various embodiments described in the parent cases and in the present disclosure, the side-by-side orientation of the original and copy panels (and intermediate transfer panel) with a vertical fold line is disclosed, as is an orientation wherein the original and copy panels are one above the other with a horizontal fold line.




Generally speaking, throughout the various embodiments described in the parent cases and in the present disclosure, the size of the panels is immaterial. However, most of the examples refer to a duplex (two-sided) form having panels measuring a conventional 8½ by 11 inches.




Throughout the descriptions in this application, cross-references are made to the disclosures of the copending applications, which are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. These cross-references are intended to provide clarity to the descriptions of the improvements described herein, and are not intended to fully summarize the content of the disclosures of the copending applications.




According to the present invention, an “endorsable” carbonless CB coating is applied to substantially the entire original panel. The “endorsable” CB coating alleviates any pen-skipping problem.




Alternatively, the carbonless CB coating applied to the original panel is “photocopyable”, or another off-the-shelf coating which is highly endorsable.




According to the present invention, the thicknesses (equivalent weights) of the CB and CF coatings are closely matched. Preferably, the equivalent weight of the CF coating is increased to nearly match that of the CB coating. This is particularly useful for roll stock, and for individual sheets stacked with the CB panels in register. In the case of dissimilar paper stock, the overall thicknesses of the (coated) paper stocks may be closely matched.




Alternatively, in a stack of unfolded, pre-treated sheets, the stack is “staggered”. In other words, a first number of sheets, such as 250-1000 sheets, are stacked in register (CB to CB, CF to CF). A second number of sheets in the stack are reversed, so that their CB panels, while in register with one another, are in register with the CF panels of the first number of sheets. Similarly, the CF panels of the second stack, while in register with one another, are in register with the CB panels of the first number of sheets in the stack. This reverse stacking can be carried out with further numbers of sheets in the stack.




According to the present invention, the paper stock is highly opaque so that fixed and variable information on one side of the form is not noticeable from the other side of the form. Further, the paper stock is sufficiently dense (non-porous) that the CB dye released onto one side of the CF-coated copy panel (for revealing an image on that side) does not “bleed through” to the other side of the CF-coated copy panel (revealing a reverse image on the other side).




According to the present invention, although the original and copy panels are substantially fully coated and able to reproduce writing upon any area of either surface (face or back) of the original panel, specific areas for entering information on the front and back surfaces of the original panel are specified, and delineated such as by pre-printed borders. The areas for entering information on the front surface of the original panel are offset, front-to-back, from the areas for entering information on the back surface of the original panel. This ensures that an area of the CB coating on the front surface of the original panel which is written upon is not employed for carbonless reproduction when writing on the back surface of the original panel, and vice-versa.




According to the present invention, the offset of specific areas for entering information on the front and back of the original panel is manually checked. The checking technique involves creating (either by hand or computer-assisted) a “hard copy” artwork master (for the printing of fixed information and delineations of specific areas for entering information) for Side


1


(front) of the original panel, and superimposing thereupon hard copy of the artwork for Side


2


(back) of the original page. Superimposing Side


1


and Side


2


can be done in various ways, each of which involves printing on a reasonably transparent medium, such as acetate, or even photocopy paper. The artwork masters are then printed, such as by using a photocopier, onto acetate (or other reasonable transparent medium, with registration marks. The two acetates are then placed back-to-back and held up to the light to check for conflicts of areas for filling in information. If such conflicts exist, the specific areas for filling in information on either the front or back of the original panel must be moved to avoid such conflict.




According to the present invention, the form may be printed with “fixed” (pre-printed) information after it is carbonless coated, which is most applicable to “mill stock”.




Alternatively, the form may be printed with fixed information prior to carbonless coating, which is most applicable to an on-press coating process, such as OPAS (trademark of Mead).




In either case (i.e., printing before or after coating), printing on both sides can be effected in one pass through a suitable printing press.




Alternatively, one side of the paper can be printed in a first pass on the printing press, and the other side can be printed on a subsequent pass through the press. (In an OPAS process, with multiple colors, it may be necessary to pass the paper stock through the printing press more than twice, to print the various colors and coat the various coatings thereon, if the number of printing/coating stations is limited.)




According to the present invention, the original panel is one color (preferably white), and the copy panel is tinted a dissimilar color, such as pink, canary, goldenrod, green or blue. The tint can be incorporated into the paper stock itself (such as it usually is, prior to coating, for mill stock), it can be applied as an ink, appropriately screened (when printing mill stock or when using an OPAS process), it can be applied as a tint, or it can be applied as a coloring in the CF coating deposited on the copy panel. In the case of an intermediate transfer panel, the intermediate transfer panel is preferably tinted a dissimilar color from either of the original and copy panels.




According to the present invention, in order to provide a visual cue as to the existence of the copy panel behind the original panel, either the copy panel is slightly larger, such as ⅛″ to ½′ wider than the original (e.g., the copy panel is between 8⅝″ and 9″ wide), or the original panel is slightly, such as ⅛″ to ½″ narrower than the copy panel. In either case, the copy panel has a “marginal strip”, or “extension” that protrudes (e.g., widthwise) discernably beyond the original panel when the form is folded along the boundary.




According to a feature of the invention, in the narrow strip of the copy panel that protrudes beyond the original panel, instructions pertaining to the proper use of the form are preprinted. These instructions would contain text such as “YOUR COPY”, and/or “FILL IN SIDE 1 OF THE ORIGINAL, RE-FOLD THE FORM, FILL IN SIDE 2 OF THE ORIGINAL”.




According to a feature of the invention, a registration line is printed along the marginal strip in register with an outer edge of the original panel.




According to a feature of the invention, the registration line is perforated for removal of the marginal strip after both sides of the original panel are filled in and the original and copy panels are separated.




According to an additional feature of the present invention, a legend notifying the user that the copy panel is “Your Copy” is pre-printed in one or more areas on the front and back sides of the copy panel.




According to a feature of the invention, when the form is filled in with a computer printer, Side


1


of the original panel is filled in, the form is refolded to expose Side


2


of the original panel for entering (variable information) and the left margin offset is increased to compensate for the marginal strip.




According to the present invention, the original panel is coated on both sides with carbonless CF, the copy panel is coated on both sides with carbonless CF for reproducing information entered on the original panel, and a separate, intermediate transfer panel is coated on only one side with carbonless CB. The intermediate transfer panel is positioned between the original and copy panels so that information entered on one side of the original panel is reproduced on a side of the copy panel, and is positioned again between the re-folded original and copy panels so that information entered on the other side of the original panel is reproduced on the other side of the copy panel. The CF coating on the original panel is “superfluous”, in the sense that it does not contribute to the carbonless reproduction of information entered on the original panel. Further, in contrast to some CB coatings, the CF coating is less apt to cause pen-skipping. In the context of the original and copy panels being formed from a single sheet, having an identical (CF) coating on the original and copy panels simplifies production of the paper stock. CF C


2


S (CF, Coated Two Sides) stock for other purposes is known, and the CB C


1


S (CB, Coated One Side) intermediate transfer panel is “off the shelf”. It is not generally known to re-use a CB sheet, as they typically appear in manifolds for one-way reproduction.




Alternatively, the intermediate transfer sheet can be CFB coated front and back), coated on one surface with CF and coated on the other surface with CB. The CB surface must always be in contact with the copy panel to effect reproduction.




An advantage of this configuration is that the original and copy panels are identically coated, but only the copy panel reproduces, with the intermediate panel inserted. Hence, insofar as paper stock is concerned, it doesn't matter which panel is the original and which panel is the copy.




Further according to the invention, a portfolio-type folder is provided having two covers (sides). The sheet forming the original and copy panels is folded and stored on one side of the portfolio. The intermediate transfer sheets are stored on the other side of the portfolio.




A variant configuration is to have plain paper original and copy panels, preferably manufactured from a single folded sheet of plain paper. An intermediate carbon panel would be inserted therebetween to effect reproduction of information entered on both sides of the original panel onto both sides of the copy panel.




According to the present invention, paper stock for the original and copy panels are produced independently, and are joined using a variety of techniques into a single “virtual” sheet. The joining techniques are applicable to the various coating configurations discussed herein, as well as in the commonly-owned U.S. Patent Applications.




In some of the configurations, off-the shelf carbonless paper stock is advantageously employed.




According to the invention, in order to obtain various configurations of uncoated, CB-coated and CF-coated surfaces on the various panels of the form, off-the-shelf carbonless CB, CF, CFB and/or CF C2S stock is laminated to provide the appropriate coatings in the proper locations.




According to the present invention, elaborating on the disclosure of the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/077,290, an oversize sheet of CFB, such as four times the width of the desired two panel form, is Z-folded and laminated to construct a two-sided self-replicating form having an original panel with CF on both sides and a copy panel with CB on both sides. To effect this result, a one end portion is folded over and laminated to a middle portion to form the original panel of the desired two-sided self-replicating form, with the CF-coated surface of the oversize sheet exposed on both sides of the original panel, and another end portion is folded over and laminated to another middle portion to form the copy panel of the desired two-sided self-replicating form, with the CB-coated surface of the oversize sheet exposed on both sides of the copy panel. The oversize sheet can be, for example, 10# stock. When laminated, the resulting two-sided self-replicating form will be essentially twice as thick, or 20#.




Preferably, according to a feature of the present invention, the adhesive used to laminate the oversize sheet is substantially opaque (e.g., a dense white or neutral color), to prevent writing on one side of the original panel from being readily discerned from the other side of the original panel. It is neither admitted nor denied that this feature (opacity of the adhesive) was disclosed in the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/077,290. Further according to the invention, the thickness of the laminated article is in the range of 20-24# (pounds).




The various improvements set forth above, and described in greater detail below, can be combined in various ways to make the self-replicating form easier to use and more manufacturable.




Additionally, as set forth in the above-referenced commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538:




According to the invention, a first single sheet of paper is delineated to have a “first” original panel and a “second” copy panel. A second, similar sheet of paper is delineated to have a third copy panel and a fourth copy panel.




Both sheets are folded one way, and the second sheet is interposed (“nested”) between the panels of the first sheet. The sheets are appropriately carbonless coated so that information entered on one surface of the first original panel is imaged onto a corresponding one surface of the underlying third copy panel, then onto a corresponding one surface of the next underlying fourth copy panel, then onto a corresponding one surface of the next underlying second copy panel.




Both sheets are re-folded, another way, and the second sheet is re-interposed between the panels of the first sheet. The sheets are appropriately carbonless coated so that information entered on the opposite surface of the first original panel is imaged onto a corresponding opposite surface of the underlying third copy panel, then onto a corresponding opposite surface of the next underlying fourth copy panel, then onto a corresponding opposite surface of the next underlying second copy panel.




In this manner, two two-panel sheets are employed, and three two-sided copies of a two-sided true-original are produced.




Embodiments using carbonless coatings covering substantially the entire surfaces of the panels (“fully-coated”) and only selected areas of the panels (“patterned”) are disclosed.




According to the invention, a first single sheet of paper is delineated to have a “first” panel and a “second” panel. A second, similar sheet of paper is delineated to have a “third” panel and a “fourth” panel.




Both sheets are folded, and the second sheet is interposed (nested) between the panels of the first sheet. The sheets are appropriately carbonless coated so that information entered on one surface of the uppermost first panel is imaged onto a corresponding one surface of the underlying third panel, then onto a corresponding one surface of the next underlying fourth panel, then onto a corresponding one surface of the next underlying second panel.




The sheets are repositioned as a whole (they are not re-folded), so that the opposite surface of the second panel is uppermost, and are appropriately carbonless coated so that information entered on the opposite surface of the second panel is imaged onto a corresponding opposite surface of the underlying fourth panel, then onto a corresponding opposite surface of the next underlying third panel, then onto a corresponding opposite surface of the next underlying first panel.




In this manner, two two-panel sheets are employed, and while none of the panels has original writing on both sides, four instances of a two-sided document are produced.




According to the invention, a single sheet of paper is delineated to have a “first” panel and a “second” panel.




The sheet is folded, and appropriately carbonless coated so that information entered on one surface of the uppermost first panel is imaged onto a corresponding one surface of the underlying second panel.




The sheet is repositioned as a whole (it is not re-folded), so that the opposite surface of the second panel is exposed for writing, and is appropriately carbonless coated so that information entered on the opposite surface of the second panel is imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface of the first panel.




In this manner, while none of the panels has original writing on both sides, two instances of a two-sided document are produced.




It has previously been disclosed that the copy panel can be coated with a “self-contained” (“SC”) type carbonless coating, so that the original panel does not need to be carbonless coated.




According to the invention, a single sheet of paper is delineated into two panels, an original panel and a copy panel. The original panel is coated with a transfer-onto-plain-paper type carbonless coating (hereinafter “anti-SC” coating), and the copy panel is un-coated. In a case where the anti-SC coating is not endorsable, it is applied to the original panel in a patterned configuration (i.e., offset from front-to-back, so that writing areas are not coated).




In this manner, with the sheet folded one way, information entered on one surface of the original panel is imaged onto a corresponding one surface of the copy panel. With the sheet folded another opposite way, information entered on the opposite surface of the original panel is imaged onto a corresponding opposite surface of the copy panel.




According to the present invention, a single sheet of paper is delineated into an original and a copy panel. The original panel is un-coated, and the copy panel is provided with an image-receiving carbonless coating.




The sheet is folded one way, and a separate sheet of paper having an image-transferring carbonless coating is interposed between the original and copy panels so that information entered on one surface of the original panel is imaged onto a corresponding one surface of the copy panel.




The sheet is folded the other way, and the separate (or another separate) image-transferring sheet is re-inserted between the original and copy panels so that information entered onto the opposite surface of the original panel is imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface of the copy panel.




This particular embodiment of the invention resides in coating the copy panel with a carbonless coating (CF) that is capable of revealing an image in either of two colors (e.g., blue or black), and in selecting from two differently-coated image-transferring sheets that are coated with one of two image-transferring coatings (i.e., CB or CB′) that will cause an image to reveal itself on the copy panel in a selected one of the two possible colors.




Alternatively, a single image-transferring sheet is employed, having a one color image-transferring coating (i.e., CB′) on its one surface and another color image-transferring coating (i.e., CB) on its opposite surface.




According to the present invention, there are various form constructions and methods of use that were non-elected for one reason or another in various of the parent cases. They are represented herein, for further prosecution.




Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent in light of the following description thereof.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Reference will be made in detail to preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Although the invention will be described in the context of these preferred embodiments, it should be understood that it is not intended to limit the spirit and scope of the invention to these particular embodiments.





FIG. 1A

is a top plan view of a self-replicating duplex form.





FIG. 1B

is a bottom plan view of the form of FIG.


1


A.





FIG. 1C

is a cross-sectional view of the form of FIG.


1


A.





FIG. 2A

is a top plan view of a self-replicating duplex form.





FIG. 2B

is a bottom plan view of the form of FIG.


2


A.





FIG. 2C

is a cross-sectional view of the form of FIG.


2


A.





FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3B

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3C

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3D

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3E

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3F

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3G

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, folded one way, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for joining two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 3H

is a cross-sectional view of the self-replicating duplex form of

FIG. 3G

, folded another way.





FIG. 4A

is a perspective view of a self-replicating duplex form, partially folded one way.





FIG. 4B

is a perspective view of the self-replicating form of

FIG. 4A

, folded another way.





FIG. 4C

is a cross-sectional view of the self-replicating form of FIG.


4


A.





FIG. 5

is a plan view of a portfolio for containing a stationary articles manufactured according to the present invention.





FIG. 6A

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6B

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6C

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6D

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6E

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6F

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6G

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6H

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6I

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.





FIG. 6J

is a cross-sectional view of a self-replicating duplex form, showing an alternate embodiment of a technique for laminating two panels into a “virtual” sheet.




The following

FIGS. 7-11

are similar to

FIGS. 1-5

of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538.





FIG. 7A

is a perspective view of a “true-original” type, two-sided, self-replicating form set, with the individual elements folded one way, for entering information on one surface of the original panel.





FIG. 7B

is a perspective view of the form set of

FIG. 7A

, folded another way, for entering information on the opposite surface of the original panel.





FIG. 7C

is a cross-sectional view of the form set of

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, showing a “fully-coated” embodiment of carbonless coatings.





FIG. 7D

is a cross-sectional view of the Form set of

FIGS. 7A and 7B

, showing a patterned embodiment of carbonless coatings.





FIG. 8A

is a perspective view of a “two-way-rite” type two-sided, self-replicating form set, with the individual elements folded one way, for entering information on one surface of the original panel.





FIG. 8B

is a perspective view of the form set of

FIG. 8A

, folded another way, for entering information on the opposite surface of the bottom-most copy panel.





FIG. 8C

is a cross-sectional view of the form set of

FIGS. 8A and 8B

, showing the carbonless coatings.





FIG. 9A

is a perspective view of a “two-way-rite” type, two-sided, self-replicating form, folded one way, for entering information on one surface of the original panel.





FIG. 9B

is a perspective view of the form of

FIG. 9A

, folded another way, for entering information on the opposite surface of the copy panel.





FIG. 9C

is a cross-sectional view of the form set of

FIGS. 9A and 9B

, showing the carbonless coatings.





FIG. 10A

is perspective view of a “true-original” type, two-sided, self-replicating form, folded one way, for entering information on one surface of the original panel.





FIG. 10B

is a perspective view of the form of

FIG. 10A

, folded another way, for entering information on the opposite surface of the original panel.





FIG. 10C

is a cross-sectional view of the form set of

FIGS. 10A and 10B

, showing the carbonless coatings.





FIG. 11A

is a perspective view of a “true-original” type two-sided, self-replicating form, with a single sheet having an original panel and a copy panel folded one way, for entering information on one surface of the original panel. Separate image-transferring sheets are also shown.





FIG. 11B

is a perspective view of the form of

FIG. 11A

, folded another way, for entering information on the opposite surface of the original panel.





FIG. 11C

is a cross-sectional view of the form of

FIGS. 11A and 11B

, showing the carbonless coatings.





FIG. 11D

is a cross-sectional view of an alternate embodiment of the form of

FIGS. 11A-11C

, wherein only a single image-transferring sheet capable of image-transferring in one of two colors is employed.











Generally, throughout the descriptions that follow, a sheet of paper (#


11


) has a front surface (#


12


)and a back surface (#


14


) and is divided by a perforated fold line (#


20


) into two “panels”—an “original” panel (#


16


) for entering information on both sides thereof, and a “copy” panel (#


18


) for replicating information on both sides thereof. Each of the panels may be considered as having a “front” surface defined by the front surface of the sheet and a “back” surface defined by the back surface of the sheet. (In the numbering scheme throughout the figures, there is a general correspondence of the aforementioned numbers indicated by a “#” prefix, where “#” is the figure number.) Each of the panels has an “inner” edge along the fold line. Each of the panels may also be considered as having two surfaces, a “one” surface (designated by an “a” suffix) and an “opposite” surface (designated by a “b” suffix). However, it should be realized that a particular surface of the multi-panel sheet may comprise contiguous “a” and “b” surfaces of various panels.




In cases where separate original and copy panels are discussed, they may ultimately be joined into a “virtual” single sheet of paper. Similarly, in the laminated constructions discussed herein, various laminate panels are assembled into a single laminated sheet.




It should be understood that the concept of a single sheet of paper is not limited to single sheets, per se, but also includes paper produced on a roll which is typically cut into single sheets either before or after printing.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIGS. 1A-1C

show a self-replicating form


110


comprising a single sheet of paper


111


having a front surface


112


and a back surface


114


. The sheet is divided into an “original” panel


116


and a “copy” panel


118


by a fold line


120


. The fold line is provided with a series of perforations


122


for folding and separating the two panels


116


,


118


. The sheet has a height (h) and a width (w), and the fold line bisects the width. In the case where the height and width are eleven inches and seventeen inches, respectively, the original and copy panels each measure 8½×11 inches, which is a common size for a form or other stationery article. The present invention is not limited to these dimensions, nor is it limited to a vertical fold line.




The following legends appear on the top of the panels, as an aid to following the description, but would not necessarily be printed on the form: “ORIGINAL (SIDE


1


)” on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


; “ORIGINAL (SIDE


2


)” on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


; “COPY (SIDE


1


)” on the back surface


114


of the copy panel


118


; and “COPY (SIDE


2


)” on the front surface


112


of the copy panel


118


.




A specific area


124


on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


is designated for the user filling in (entering) first “variable” information (represented by “XXXXX”), such as with a pen or typewriter. The remaining area of the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


may be utilized for providing first pre-printed, “fixed” information (represented by “AAAAA”) on the form


110


.




A specific area


134


on the back surface


114


of the copy panel


118


is aligned with the area


124


on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


, when the form


110


is folded one way, as indicated by the arrow “A”, and reproduces the variable information (“XXXXX”) entered in the area


124


on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


.




A specific area


126


on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


is designated for the user filling in (entering) second “variable” information (represented by “YYYYY”), such as with a pen or typewriter. The remaining area of the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


may be utilized for providing second pre-printed, “fixed” information (represented by “BBBBB”) on the form


110


.




A specific area


136


on the front surface


112


of the copy panel


118


is aligned with the area


126


on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


, when the form


110


is folded another, opposite way, as indicated by the arrow “B”, and reproduces the variable information (“YYYYY”) entered in the area


126


on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


.




The areas


124


,


126


,


134


and


136


can each comprise several non-contiguous areas. Only one area is shown for each, for illustrative clarity.




In order to effect reproduction of information entered on both sides of the original panel


116


onto both sides of the copy panel


118


, the form is coated with carbonless coatings, as follows.




A carbonless CB treatment


130




a


is applied to substantially the entire back surface


114


of the original panel


112


for transferring an image of the first variable information (“XXXXX”) entered on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


onto the back surface


114


of the copy panel


118


. A carbonless CF treatment


132




a


is applied to substantially the entire back surface


114


of the copy panel


118


for revealing an image of the first variable information (“XXXXX”) entered on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


.




A carbonless CB treatment


130




b


is applied to substantially the entire front surface


112


of the original panel


112


for transferring an image of the second variable information (“YYYYY”) entered on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


onto the front surface


112


of the copy panel


118


. A carbonless CF treatment


132




b


is applied to substantially the entire front surface


112


of the copy panel


118


for revealing an image of the second variable information (“YYYYY”) entered on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


.




In use, the panels are folded one way, as indicated by the arrow “A”, to enter information on the front of the original panel, and are folded another way, as indicated by the arrow “B”, to enter information on the back of the original panel. This information is reproduced on the back and front surfaces, respectively, of the copy panel, as explained above. The form is then unfolded and the panels are separated along the perforations


122


of the fold line


120


.




In the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183, coating substantially the entire front and back surfaces of the original and copy panels with carbonless CB and CF treatments, respectively, was discussed. As noted in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189, some CB coatings tend to clog the tips of ball point pens, thereby causing pen skipping (difficulty in entering information on a CB coated area of the original panel). The solution proposed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189 was applying the coatings only to specific, offset areas on the face (front) and back of the original panel (offset patterning of the CB coatings).




According to the present invention, the carbonless CB coating applied to the original panel is an “endorsable” coating which does not cause a pen to skip when written upon. Empirical testing by the applicants has shown that certain CB coatings, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,016,308 and 3,429,827 (assigned to Moore Business Forms) and “AQUEOUS OPAS” (under development by MEAD/OPAS) are highly “endorsable”. Other off-the-shelf coatings have varying degrees of endorsability. The CF coating on the copy panel must be reactive with the selected CB coating.




The carbonless CB coating applied to the original panel may also be selected from a class of coatings that are “photocopyable”. Applicants' tests of photocopyable CB coatings indicate that they exhibit a high degree of endorsability. In other words, they accept a substantial amount of writing without causing any pen skipping problem. Examples of photocopyable carbonless coatings are “RALLY” (available from Appleton Papers) and “TARTAN” (available from MEAD). Photocopyable carbonless paper is also available from Xerox Corp., and contains uniformly small CB microcapsules.




Testing by applicants has demonstrated that writing in a coated area one side of the original panel does not visibly affect the ability of that coated area to transfer an image when information is entered in a perfectly aligned area on the other side of the original panel. Nevertheless, the possibility exists in some applications, and using some types of carbonless coatings, that the “superfluous” release of dye from the written-upon CB coating will attenuate the ability of that CB coating to transfer an image, when writing from the other side of the form.




According to the present invention, although the original and copy panels are substantially fully coated (i.e., with endorsable CB) and able to reproduce variable information entered upon any area of either surface (face or back) of the original panel, advantageously specific areas


124


and


126


for entering information on the front and back surfaces, respectively, of the original panel


116


are specified, and delineated such as by pre-printed borders. The areas


124


for entering information on the front surface


112


of the original panel


116


are offset, front-to-back, from the areas


126


for entering information on the back surface


114


of the original panel


116


. This ensures that an area of the CB coating on the front surface of the original panel which is written upon (i.e., the area


124


) is not employed for carbonless reproduction when writing on the back surface of the original panel, and vice-versa.




Methods and apparatus for ensuring a front-to-back offset of areas for entering information on the front and back surfaces of the original panel are disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/494,565, and are incorporated by reference herein.




According to the present invention, the offset of specific areas for entering information on the front and back of the original panel is manually checked. The checking technique involves creating (either by hand or computer-assisted) a “hard copy” artwork master (for the printing of fixed information and delineations of specific areas for entering information) for Side


1


(front) of the original panel, and superimposing thereupon hard copy of the artwork for Side


2


(back) of the original page. Superimposing the artwork for Side


1


and Side


2


can be done in various ways, each of which involves printing on a reasonably transparent medium, such as acetate, or even photocopy paper. The artwork masters are then printed, such as by using a photocopier, onto acetate (or other reasonably transparent medium), preferably with registration marks. The two acetates are then placed back-to-back (with registration marks aligned) and viewed (such as by holding up to the light source) to check for “conflicts” (superposition) of areas for filling in information on the front (face) and back of the original panel. If such a conflict exists, the layout of either the front or back of the original panel must be modified to ensure that there is a front-to-back offset of all areas for filling in information.




Inasmuch as the invention described in the parent and present cases deals with the making of a two-sided copy of information entered on both sides of an original panel (e.g., form), it is desirable that information entered or reproduced on one side of the original and copy panel, respectively, does not show through when viewing the other side of the original and copy panel, respectively.




According to the present invention, the paper stock is highly opaque so that fixed and variable information on one side of the form is not readily perceived from the other side of the form. Further, the paper stock is sufficiently dense (non-porous) that the CB dye released onto one side of the CF-coated copy panel (for revealing an image on that side) does not “bleed through” to the other side of the CF-coated copy panel (revealing an undesirable “reverse image” on the other side). Preferably, the form is made from 20# (twenty pound) paper stock, such as “form bond”.




In

FIG. 1C

, it appears that the CB and CF coatings are closely matched in thickness (although the drawings are merely illustrative, and exaggerated to aid in understanding the invention). In reality, in most carbonless coating processes, the CB coating tends to be measurably thicker than the CF coating. Typical equivalent weights for the CB coating are 1.5 pounds, and typical equivalent weights for the CF coating are 0.3 pounds. (As used herein, “equivalent weight” is an indicator of actual thickness.) Inasmuch as the original panel has two thicknesses of CB coating (one each on the front and back surfaces), and the copy panel has two thicknesses of CF coating (one each on the front and back surfaces), the original panel would normally be loaded with approximately 3.0 pounds of CB coating, and the copy panel would be loaded with 0.6 pounds of CF coating. In a stack of unfolded, carbonless-coated sheets (such as shown in FIGS.


1


A and


1


B), laid flat with the CB panels in register and the CF panels in register, eventually, if the stack was high enough, the different coating loading would become noticeable. Similarly, in a roll of carbonless-coated paper, a thickness difference would become evident, and the roll would tend to assume a conical profile. Such a thickness difference between the CB and CF coatings can possibly present a handling problem.




According to the present invention, the thicknesses (equivalent weights) of the CB and CF coatings are closely matched (as illustrated in FIG.


1


C). Preferably, the equivalent weight of the CF coating is increased to nearly match that of the CB coating, rather than vice-versa. (A minimum CB thickness is required to maintain reproduction quality.) This is particularly useful for roll stock, and for individual sheets stacked with the CB panels in register.




Alternatively, when joining a CB-coated original panel to a CF-coated copy panel, as described hereinbelow, the paper stock thicknesses can be adjusted to provide an overall correspondence of thickness between the CB-coated original panel and the CF-coated copy panel, taking into account the thickness of the paper and any coatings thereon. This is also applicable in the case of an un-coated original panel, such as is discussed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 484,686.




In either case, an additional benefit of the present invention is evident, in that CB-coated panels stacked in register (on unfolded sheets or separate panels) will not be in contact with CF-coated, dye-revealing panels. Contact of CB and CF surfaces presents problems of creating spurious images during storage and handling, which are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,062,567 (Macaulay).




Alternatively, in a stack of unfolded, coated sheets having unequally weighted panels, the stack is “staggered”. In other words, a first number of sheets, such as 250-1000 sheets, are stacked in register (CB to CB, CF to CF). A second number of sheets in the stack are reversed, so that their CB panels, while in register with one another, are in register with the CF panels of the first number of sheets. Similarly, the second number of CF panels, while in register with one another, are in register with the CB panels of the first number of sheets in the stack. This “reverse stacking” can be carried out with further numbers of sheets in the stack.




There are basically two techniques for coating paper stock for this invention—the paper can be coated with carbonless coatings at the paper mill, or it can be coated “on press”, such as with OPAS (On Press Application System) coatings. With already coated mill stock, the paper is printed after being coated. With OPAS, the paper is usually printed immediately prior to being coated.




According to the present invention, the form


110


is printed with fixed information after carbonless coatings are applied thereto.




Alternatively, the form


110


is printed with fixed information prior to (or in connection with) carbonless coatings being applied thereto.




In either case, printing on both sides can be accomplished in a single pass through a suitable printing press. Alternatively, one side of the paper can be printed (and OPAS coated) in one pass on the printing press, and the other side can be printed on a subsequent pass through the press. Registration of the printed information from one side to the other side of the form is critical in either case, and in the case of two (or more) passes, a re-insertion press would be required.




As disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183, the original panel is preferably white, and the copy panel is preferably tinted a dissimilar color, such as pink. With mill stock, the pink tint is usually in the paper stock itself. As disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686, the intermediate transfer panel may be dissimilarly colored from either of the original or copy panels.




According to the present invention, the tint on the copy (or intermediate transfer) panel can be 1) incorporated in the paper stock itself, which is most appropriate for mill stock, and which is most applicable to the “joining” improvements described hereinbelow, 2) applied as an ink, appropriately screened, which is most appropriate for the single sheet embodiments of the present invention, 3) applied in a tinting process, or 4) it can be applied as a coloring in the carbonless coating deposited on the panel being tinted. The latter three techniques (2,3 and 4) are most applicable to OPAS processes.




As noted hereinbelow, the copy panel can be larger (wider) than the original panel.




Also, as noted below, an additional intermediate transfer sheet can be provided to eliminate the need for having carbonless CB coatings on the original panel.




Also, as noted below, the original and copy panels can be produced as separate sheets, to be joined later into a single “virtual” sheet, or can be produced as a laminated article.




As indicated by the arrow “A” in

FIG. 1A

, sheets, once printed with fixed information, are best provided to the user in a folded configuration, with the copy panel behind the original panel, and Side


1


of the original panel


116


exposed for entering information on the face


112


of the original panel


116


. If the original and copy panels are of closely matched dimension (e.g., 8½″×11″ each), it may not be immediately apparent to the end user that there are two panels in the folded form.




According to the present invention, in order to provide a visual cue as to the existence of the copy panel behind the original panel, the copy panel is larger than the original panel. In a side-by-side orientation of the original and copy panels, the copy panel would be wider than the original panel. This can be accomplished in one of two ways: either the copy panel is slightly, such as ⅛″ to ½″ wider than the original (i.e., the copy panel is between 8⅝″ and 9″ wide), or the original panel is slightly, such as ⅛″ to ½″ narrower than the copy panel. In either case, the copy panel has a “marginal strip”, or “extension” that protrudes, widthwise, discernably beyond the original panel when the form is folded along the boundary (


220


). In cases where the copy and original panels are disposed one atop the other (as shown in FIGS. 1P and 1Q of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189), the copy panel is advantageously longer than the original panel. Providing a wider copy panel is discussed hereinbelow.





FIGS. 2A-2C

show self-replicating form


210


comprising a single sheet of paper


211


having a front surface


212


and a back surface


214


. The sheet is divided into an “original” panel


216


and a “copy” panel


218


by a fold line


220


. The fold line is provided with a series of perforations


222


for folding and separating the two panels


216


,


218


. The sheet has a height (h) and a width (w′), and, unlike the form


110


, the fold line


220


does not “exactly” bisect the width. Rather, in the case where the height and width are eleven inches and 17½ inches, respectively, the original panel measures 8½ inches wide by 11 inches high, which is a common size for a form, and the copy panel measures 9 inches wide by 11 inches high. The present invention is not limited to these dimensions, nor to a vertical fold line. In

FIGS. 2A

,


2


B and


2


C, the form is shown without carbonless coatings and without specific areas for entering variable information delineated, for illustrative clarity, as well as to provide utility in descriptions of other coating configurations discussed herein.




Because the copy panel


218


is wider than the original panel


216


, a marginal strip


240


along the outer edge of the copy panel is exposed when the form is folded (either way).




According to the invention, a “registration” line


242


may be printed at a position along the edge of the copy panel, in register with the outer edge of the original panel (when the form is folded), e.g. at 8½ inches from the fold


420


.




Further, whether or not the registration line


242


is actually printed, a line of perforations


244


may be disposed along that line. In this manner, once the form is completely filled in on both sides, the marginal strip


420


can easily be removed, thereby providing original and copy panels of the same dimension (e.g., 8½ inches wide).




According to a feature of the invention, in the marginal strip


240


of the copy panel


218


that protrudes beyond the original panel


216


(when folded), instructions pertaining to the proper use of the form are pre-printed (as “fixed” information). These instructions would contain text such as “THIS IS YOUR COPY INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE:”, which would be visible on the back surface


214


of the copy panel


218


when the form is folded one way for entering information on the face


212


of the original panel


216


, and “DO NOT WRITE ON THIS COPY”, which would be visible on the front surface


212


of the copy panel


218


when the form is folded the other way for entering information on the back


214


of the original panel


216


.




According to an additional feature of the present invention, further “cues” are provided to the user to indicate that the copy panel is for reproducing information, not for entering it. These could include legends such as “YOUR COPY” pre-printed as fixed information in a “random repeat” pattern across the front and back surfaces of the copy panel (generally exclusive of the area defined by the marginal strip). Preferably, these legends are “screened” (printed in a dot pattern having 5-20% density) so they won't obscure other information on the form.




These various cues, that the original panel is for entering variable information (i.e., filling in the form) and that the copy panel should not be written upon, including tinting the copy panel, providing a marginal strip on the copy panel extending beyond the edge of the original panel when the form is folded (either way), providing legends in the marginal strip (and instructions for use of the form), and providing legends on the front and back surfaces of the copy panel, should ensure that the form is properly utilized.




Although many duplex forms are filled in by hand, variable information may be entered with a typewriter or computer printer. When filling out Side


1


, the fold (


220


; i.e., the inner edges of the original and copy panels) is to the left of the form, and can be aligned against the left margin “stop” of a typewriter or printer. When the form is re-folded to enter information on Side


2


of the original panel, the fold (


220


) is to the right, and the marginal strip (


240


; e.g., outer edge of the copy panel) is to the left. With the extreme outward edge of the copy panel abutting the left margin stop of the typewriter or printer, this will cause a rightward shift of the form, equivalent to the width of the marginal strip. When using a typewriter, this would not present much of a problem. However, when using a computer printer, spaces for filling in information on the back of the original panel would be shifted ½ inch to the right of where they otherwise (without the marginal strip) are supposed to be. (This would not be a problem if the marginal strip were removed prior to printing on Side


2


.)




According to the invention, when the form


210


is filled in with a computer printer, printing on the back (Side


2


) of the original panel is caused to shift to the right an amount equivalent to the width of the marginal strip


240


(e.g., ½ inch) to ensure proper registration of variable information being entered with the space (e.g.,


126


,


136


of

FIGS. 1A and 1B

) where it is supposed to be entered (and reproduced).




As noted above, the equivalent weights of the original and copy panels can be made equal.




Also, as noted below, an additional intermediate transfer sheet can be provided to eliminate the need for having carbonless CB coatings on the original panel.




Also, as noted below, the original and copy panels can be produced as separate sheets, to be joined later into a single “virtual” sheet, or can be produced as a laminated article.





FIGS. 4A-4C

show a form


410


comprising a single folded sheet


411


of paper, having a front surface


412


and a back surface


414


.




The sheet is divided into an “original” panel


416


and a “copy” panel


418


by a fold line


420


. The fold line is provided with a series of perforations


422


for folding and separating the two panels


416


,


418


. The sheet has a height and a width. The fold line


420


may bisect the width, as in

FIGS. 1A-1C

, so that the original and copy panels are both 8½×11 inches. Preferably, the sheet is wider and the copy panel is provided with a marginal extension (


240


), as shown in

FIGS. 2A-2C

, so that the original panel is 8½×11 inches and the copy is wider (e.g. 9×11 inches). The present invention is not limited to these dimensions, nor to a vertical fold line.




In marked contrast to the tendency of CB coatings causing pen-skipping, it is noted that CF coatings tend not to interfere with writing, such as with a ball point pen.




According to the present invention, the original panel is coated with both sides with carbonless CF


432


, the copy panel is coated on both sides with carbonless CF for reproducing information entered on the original panel, and a separate, intermediate transfer panel


460


is coated on only side with carbonless CB


430


. As in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686, the intermediate transfer panel is positioned between the original and copy panels so that information entered on one side of the original panel is reproduced on a side of the copy panel, and is re-positioned between the refolded original and copy panels so that information entered on the other side of the original is reproduced on the other side of the copy panel. The CF coating on the original panel is “superfluous”, in the sense that it does not contribute to the carbonless reproduction of information entered on the original panel. However, in the context of the original and copy panels being formed from a single sheet, having an identical (CF) coating on the original panel simplifies production of the paper stock.




Alternatively, the intermediate transfer sheet can be CFB coated front and back), coated on one surface with CF and coated on the other surface with CB. The CB surf ace must always be in contact with the copy panel to effect reproduction.




An advantage of this configuration is that the original and copy panels are identically coated, but only the copy panel reproduces, with the intermediate panel inserted. Hence, insofar as paper stock is concerned, it doesn't matter which panel is the original and which panel is the copy.




A variant configuration is to have plain paper original and copy panels, preferably manufactured from a single folded sheet of plain paper. An intermediate carbon panel would be inserted therebetween to effect reproduction of information entered on both sides of the original panel onto both sides of the copy panel.





FIG. 5

shows a presentation folder


500


having a front cover


502


and a back cover


504


. Each of the front and back covers is provided with a flap


502




a


and


504




a


, respectively, for holding stationery articles. In this example, the front cover holds a stationery article


506


, such as the several of the folded panels


416


and


418


of

FIG. 4A

, and the back cover holds a stationery article


508


such as the intermediate transfer sheet


460


of FIG.


4


A. Additionally, envelopes


510


are suitably stored in the back cover with the stationery articles


508


. Additionally, the back flap


504




a


is provided with two spaced-apart slits


512


for holding another stationery article, such as a business card


514


. The presentation folder


500


is useful for the form of

FIG. 4A

, as well as for the form disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686 (plain paper original, CF-coated copy), or for other form configurations disclosed in this or the parent cases.




As noted above, the equivalent weights of the original and copy panels can be made equal.




Also, as noted above, the copy panel can be larger (e.g., wider) than the original panel.




Also, as noted below, the original and copy panels can be produced as separate sheets, to be joined later into a single “virtual” sheet, or can be produced as a laminated article.




As disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189, the form (e.g., the form


110


of

FIG. 1A

) can be provided as a single sheet of paper, or as two separate sheets (panels) in a “set”). Generally, constructing the two-sided, self-replicating carbonless form of this invention from a single sheet of paper, or from a fabricating that functions as a single sheet of paper is preferred.




According to the present invention, two separate panels are produced, for example one having a CB coating on both sides and forming the original panel, the other having a CF coating on both sides and forming the copy panel. The original and copy panels are joined at their inner edges using a variety of techniques disclosed herein to form a “virtual” single sheet. In this manner, paper stocks for the original and copy panels can be produced separately, thereby simplifying manufacture thereof, especially for mill stock.




It should be noted that the original panel can be uncoated, as described in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 484,686, in which case it would be joined to a CF-coated copy panel.




It should also be noted that the original panel can be CF-coated, as described above.





FIGS. 3A-3H

show various techniques of joining individual original and copy panels


316


and


318


into a single, “virtual” sheet


310


having a front surface


312


and a back surface


314


. This technique would be especially useful for manufacturers who lack the capability of coating each side of the sheet (e.g., the sheet


110


of

FIG. 1A

) with both carbonless CB and CF coatings, in that a CB-coated original panel can be joined to a CF coated copy panel. This is relevant whether the panels are substantially fully coated (as shown in FIGS. 1A-1C, and as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183), or have coatings applied only to specific areas (as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 07/436,189 and 07/494,565), or in the case of a non-coated original panel and CF-coated copy panel (as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686). Throughout

FIGS. 3A-3H

, an original panel and a copy panel are joined at or near what will ultimately be the fold line (e.g., the perforated fold line


120


of

FIG. 1A

) of the virtual sheet.





FIG. 3A

shows a first technique for joining an original panel


316




a


and a copy panel


318




a


into a single, virtual sheet


310




a


. In this embodiment, inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




a


and


318




a


, respectively, are simply overlapped, for instance by one-quarter inch, at what will ultimately be the fold line


320




a


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A), and are glued with together with an adhesive


350




a


. A line of perforations


322




a


(corresponding to the perforations


122


of

FIG. 1A

) are provided through the overlapping inner edges of the original and copy panels, at the fold line


320




a.







FIG. 3B

shows an alternate technique for joining the original and the copy panels,


316




b


and


318




b


, into a single virtual sheet


310




b


. In this embodiment, again the inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




b


and


318




b


, respectively, are overlapped, for instance by one-quarter inch, near what will ultimately be the fold line


320




b


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A), and are glued with together with an adhesive


350




b


. A line of perforations


322




b


(corresponding to the perforations


122


of

FIG. 1A

) is provided through the inner edge of the original panel, off to one side of the fold line


320




b


, more particularly, near the inner edge of the original panel


316




b


, adjacent the overlap. In this manner, the overlapping inner edges of the original and copy panels are separated from the original panel, and are “carried” with the copy panel.





FIG. 3C

shows an alternate technique for joining the original and the copy panels,


316




c


and


318




c


, into a single virtual sheet


310




c


. In this embodiment, again the inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




c


and


318




c


, respectively, are overlapped, for instance by one-quarter inch, at what will ultimately be the fold line


320




c


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A),and are glued with together with an adhesive


350




c


. Two lines of perforations


322




c


and


323




c


are provided through the inner edges of the original and copy panels, off to either side of the fold line


320




c


, more particularly, near the inner edges of the original and copy panels, adjacent the overlap. In this manner, the overlapping inner edges of the original and copy panels may ultimately be separated from both the original and copy panels, and may be discarded as waste.





FIG. 3D

shows an alternate technique for joining the original and the copy panels,


316




d


and


318




d


, into a single virtual sheet


310




d


. In this embodiment, the inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




d


and


318




d


, respectively, are abutted, or nearly abutted, there being a small gap


354




d


(0.0-0.125 inches) therebetween, at what will ultimately be the fold line


320




d


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A). A narrow (e.g., one-eighth to one-half inch wide) tape


352




d


is laid along the fold line


320




d


, “bridging” the gap between the inner edges of the original and copy panels, and is secured to the inner edges of the original and copy panels with an adhesive


350




d


. As shown, the tape is “necked down” in thickness along the fold line


320




d


, to form a “living hinge” to facilitate folding the form (as discussed hereinabove) and to facilitate separating the original from the copy panel (after completely filling in the variable information on the form) along the fold line


320




d


. The tape


352




d


may be a paper or plastic tape, and in either case should be very thin so that it does not contribute significantly to the thickness of the sheet


310




d.







FIG. 3E

shows an alternate technique for joining the original and the copy panels,


316




e


and


318




e


, into a single virtual sheet


310




e


. In this embodiment, again the inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




e


and


318




e


, respectively, are abutted, or nearly abutted, there being a small gap (0.0-0.125 inches) therebetween, at what will ultimately be the fold line


320




e


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A). Again, a narrow (one-eighth to one-quarter inch wide) tape


352




e


is laid along the fold line


320




e


, “bridging” the gap


354




e


between the inner edges of the original and copy panels, and is secured to the inner edges of the original and copy panels with an adhesive


350




e


. As shown, the tape is provided with perforations


322




e


(corresponding to the perforations


122


of

FIG. 1A

) along the fold line


320




e


, to form a “living hinge” to facilitate folding the form (as discussed hereinabove) and to facilitate separating the original from the copy panel (after completely filling in the variable information on the form) along the fold line


320




e


. The tape


352




e


may be a paper or plastic tape, and in either case should be very thin so that it does not contribute significantly to the thickness of the sheet


310




e.







FIG. 3F

shows an alternate technique for joining the original and the copy panels,


316




f


and


318




f


, into a single virtual sheet


310




f


. In this embodiment, again the inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




f


and


318




f


, respectively, are abutted, or nearly abutted, there being a small gap


354




f


(0.0-0.125 inches) therebetween, at what will ultimately be the fold line


320




f


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A). Again, a narrow (one-eighth to one-quarter inch wide) tape


352




f


is laid along the fold line


320




f


, “bridging” the gap between the inner edges of the original and copy panels, and is secured to the inner edges of the original and copy panels with an adhesive


350




f


. As shown, the tape is provided with perforations


322




f


(corresponding to the perforations


122


of

FIG. 1A

) along the fold line


320




f


, to form a “living hinge” to facilitate folding the form (as discussed hereinabove) and to facilitate separating the original from the copy panel (after completely filling in the variable information on the form) along the fold line


320




e


. The tape


352




f


may be a paper or plastic tape, and in either case should be very thin so that it does not contribute significantly to the thickness of the sheet


310




f


. As illustrated in

FIG. 3F

, the tape


352




f


is extremely thin, such as on the order of 0.1-0.5 mil, and is preferably pressed into the structure of the original and copy panels so that it does not add to their thickness at all. A suitable tape for this application is a mylar reinforcement tape available from Hammermill Papers (Flat-Stak™).





FIG. 3G

shows a technique for joining the original and copy panels


316




g


and


318




g


into a single virtual sheet


310


, and is similar in many respects to the technique discussed with respect to FIG.


3


F. In this case, however, the tape


352




g


is wider (e.g., one inch wide), and is provided with holes


356




g


for locating the original and/or copy panels in a three-ring binder, or the like. To this end, holes


356




g


in the copy panel


318




g


are provided through an outer portion of the tape


352




g


as well as through the copy panel


318




g


, at an appropriate distance from the fold line


320




g


that the copy panel


318




g


can be mounted in a binder (not shown), or in a file folder with two-prong fasteners (not shown). Similarly, holes


356




g


in the original panel


316




g


are provided through an outer portion of the tape


352




g


as well as through the original panel


316




g


, at an appropriate distance from the fold line


320




g


that the original panel


316




g


can be mounted in a binder or file folder. Referring to

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, it is seen that the “left” edges of “Sides


1


” of both the original and copy panels are disposed at the fold line. The holes


356




g


are preferably formed in the tape and the original with the form already folded (i.e., after pre-printing and after filling out). This technique is especially appropriate for retaining the original and/or copy panels in a three-ring binder. Should it be desired that only the copy panel is punched with holes


356




g


for retention in a binder or the like, the holes


356




g


would need to be formed with the form unfolded. Also, by providing the wider tape configuration shown in

FIG. 3G

, without the holes


356




g


already punched therein, this provides the end user with the option of punching holes as desired, through the tape which will act as a reinforcement for the panel in a binder. The reinforcement feature is especially important, for instance, in the case of a lightweight panel, such as a 10-12# copy panel.





FIG. 3H

shows an alternate technique for joining the original and the copy panels,


316




h


and


318




h


, into a single virtual sheet


310




h


. In this embodiment, again the inner edges of the original and copy panels


316




h


and


318




h


, respectively, are abutted, or nearly abutted, there being a small gap (0.0-0.125 inches) therebetween, at what will ultimately be the fold line


320




h


(corresponding to the fold line


120


of FIG.


1


A). A narrow “bead” of adhesive


350




h


is laid along the fold line


320




h


, “bridging” the gap between the inner edges of the original and copy panels. As shown, the bead


350




h


does not need to be provided with perforations, as it will act as a “living hinge” to facilitate folding the form (as discussed hereinabove) and to facilitate separating the original from the copy panel (after completely filling in the variable information on the form) along the fold line


320




h


. As with the tape embodiments, the adhesive should be very thin so that it does not add significantly to the thickness of the sheet


310




h


. A suitable adhesive for this application is any of a number of “padding” adhesives such as are commonly used by forms manufacturers.




As noted above, the equivalent weights of the original and copy panels can be made equal. More significantly, however, the “base” paper stocks for the original and copy panels, and their total coated thicknesses, can be completely dissimilar. For instance, in a case where it is desirable to have an uncoated, high rag content or acid-free original panel, such a panel can be joined with a CF-coated copy panel. (An embodiment with an uncoated original panel, a CF-coated copy panel and a CB-coated intermediate transfer panel is disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 484,686.)




Also, as noted above, the copy panel can be advantageously larger than the original panel.




Also, as noted above, an additional intermediate transfer sheet can be provided to eliminate the need for having carbonless CB coatings on the original panel.




It was discussed, hereinabove, how two panels of paper can be joined into a single “virtual” sheet. Such a technique is useful, for instance, for manufacturers who lack capability of producing a single sheet with the various coating configurations discussed herein and in the aforementioned patent applications.





FIGS. 6A-6J

show various techniques for manufacturing a self-replicating duplex form (or stationary article) as a laminated structure. The views are “exploded”, and cross-section lines are omitted from the paper stock. CB coatings are shown as circles, and CF coatings are shown as cross-section lines. Throughout the figures, individual laminates are laid together to form various original and copy panels, in a single “virtual” sheet. Where trim lines (“A” and “B” are shown, the original panel


616




x


extends from the trim line “A” to the fold line


620




x


, and the copy panel


618




x


extends from the fold line to the trim line “B”. (“x” is the figure suffix “a” through “j”.) AS will be evident, while trim lines are shown, the paper need not be trimmed.




In the case of an original panel coated on both sides with carbonless CB and a copy panel coated on both sides with carbonless CF, in a “true” single sheet configuration, as disclosed for instance in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183, it would be necessary to coat both sides of the sheet with both CB and CF coatings. This would require manufacturing capability which may be beyond the reach of some carbonless paper manufacturers. The techniques described below make producing forms with the various coating arrangements discussed herein and hereinbefore in the aforementioned U.S. Patent Applications available to virtually every manufacturer or print shop.





FIG. 6A

shows (exploded view) a technique for manufacturing separate panels of readily-available carbonless paper stock into a single “virtual” sheet


610




a


. In this case, the original panel


616




a


is formed to two panels (“laminates”) of carbonless CB paper stock (each coated on only one side with carbonless CB) and two panels of carbonless CF paper stock (each coated on only one side with carbonless CF), as follows.




A panel (laminate)


660




a


of carbonless CB paper stock has a coating


630




a


of carbonless CB on one of its surfaces


662




a


and is uncoated (i.e., does not have a carbonless coating) on its opposite surface


664




a


. Similarly, a panel (laminate)


670




a


of carbonless CB paper stock is coated on one of its surfaces


672




a


with carbonless CB


630




b


, and its opposite surface


674




a


is not coated. A layer of adhesive


650




a


is applied between the uncoated surfaces


664




a


and


674




a


of the panels


660




a


and


670




a


, respectively, to form a laminated structure for the original panel


616




a


which is coated on both sides with carbonless CB.




A panel (laminate)


680




a


of carbonless CF paper stock has a coating


632




a


of carbonless CF on one of its surfaces


682




a


and is uncoated (i.e., does not have a carbonless coating) on its opposite surface


684




a


. Similarly, a panel (laminate)


690




a


of carbonless CF paper stock is coated on one of its surfaces


692




a


with carbonless CF


632




b


, and its opposite surface


694




a


is not coated. A layer of adhesive


650




a


is applied between the uncoated surfaces


684




a


and


694




a


of the panels


680




a


and


690




a


, respectively, to form a laminated structure for the copy panel


618




a


which is coated on both sides with carbonless CF.




As shown, the inner edges of the panels


660




a


,


670




a


,


680




a


and


690




a


can be interleaved and overlapped, in a manner similar to that shown with respect to

FIG. 3A

, and perforated with perforations


622




a


along a fold line


620




a


distinguishing the original panel


616




a


from the copy panel


618




a.






Alternatively, the inner edges of the two CF panels


680




a


and


690




a


can be laminated and sandwiched between (not shown), rather than interleaved with (as shown) the two CB panels


660




a


and


670




a


. This would resemble the next configuration discussed with respect to FIG.


6


B.




In the various laminating techniques disclosed wherein the inner edges of the original and copy panels are overlapped (e.g.,

FIGS. 6A

,


6


B,


6


C,


6


D and


6


F), the fold line


620


and perforations


622


can advantageously be located off to one side of the overlapping inner edges of the original and copy panels, as shown in

FIG. 3B

, preferably towards the inner edge of the original panel.





FIG. 6B

shows an alternate technique for forming a single “virtual” sheet having an original panel coated on both sides with carbonless CB and a copy panel coated on both sides with carbonless CF.




As in the previously described embodiment (FIG.


6


A), a panel


660




b


of carbonless CB paper stock has a coating


630




a


of carbonless CB on one of its surfaces


662




b


and its opposite surface


664




b


is not CB-coated. A panel


670




b


of carbonless CB paper stock is coated on one of its surfaces


672




b


with carbonless CB


630




b


, and its opposite surface


674




a


is not CB-coated. A layer of adhesive


650




b


is applied between the uncoated surfaces


664




b


and


674




b


of the panels


660




b


and


670




b


, respectively, to form a laminated structure for the original panel


616




b


which is coated on both sides with carbonless CB.




Unlike the previously described embodiment (FIG.


6


A), in this embodiment a single panel


680




b


of “CF C2S” (coated on both sides with carbonless CF) coated carbonless paper has a CF coating


632




b


on one of its surfaces


682




b


and has a CF coating


632




b


on its opposite surface


684




b.






As in the previously described embodiment (FIG.


6


A), the inner edge of the CF-coated copy panel


618




b


is sandwiched between the inner edges of the panels


660




b


and


670




b


forming the original panel


616




b


. The inner edges are appropriately perforated with perforations


622




b


along a fold line


620




b.






Although not shown, a single panel coated with CB on both sides could be joined to two panels (or a folded single panel) coated with CF on one side. In such a case, the panel


680




b


would be CB coated (both sides) and the panels


660




b


and


670




b


would be CF-coated (one side).





FIG. 6C

illustrates a variation on the technique of

FIG. 6A

, but is also applicable to the technique of FIG.


6


B. In this case, there is only one CB panel


660




c


, and it is folded upon itself so that its CB-coated surface


662




c


is exposed. Its uncoated surface


664




c


is glued with an adhesive


650




c


to form a laminated original panel


616




c


having a CB coating


630




a


on both its front and back surfaces. Although the folds are shown curved (with a relatively large radius), they are preferably ultimately creased, as shown in

FIGS. 6G-6J

. As indicated by the line “A”, the actual fold of the CB panel


660




c


can be excised (trimmed) at the outer edge of the original panel


616




c.






Similarly, in this embodiment there is only one CF panel


680




c


, and it is folded upon itself so that its CF-coated surface


682




c


is exposed, after lamination. Its uncoated surface


684




c


is glued with an adhesive


650




a


to form a laminated copy panel


618




c


having a CF coating


632




a


on both its front and back surfaces. As indicated by the line “B”, the actual fold of the CF panel


680




c


can be excised (trimmed) to form the outer edge of the copy panel


618




c.






In

FIGS. 6C-6J

, trim lines “A” and “B” are shown. The original panel extends between the trim line “A” and the fold line (


620




x


) and the copy panel extends between the fold line and the trim line “B”. While the laminated article need not be trimmed (but preferably are trimmed), these trim lines aid in following the descriptions of the drawings.




The technique of

FIG. 6C

, namely laminating a panel upon itself, can be applied to only one of the panels, for instance to form the original panel


616




b


of the embodiment of

FIG. 6B

(which uses a single thickness CF C2S copy panel


618




b


, and therefore need not be a laminated structure of two CF panels).





FIG. 6D

shows a variation on the technique of

FIG. 6C

, dealing mainly with the way in which the inner edges of the original and copy panels are joined together. In this case, by way of example, a single CB panel


660




d


is folded and laminated so that its CB-coated surface


632




d


is exposed, forming both sides of the original panel


616




d


, and a single CF-coated panel


680




d


is folded and laminates so that its CF-surface


682




d


is exposed, forming both sides of the copy panel


618




d


. The uncoated surfaces


664




d


and


684




d


of the CB and CF panels


660




d


and


680




d


, respectively, are glued with a laminating adhesive


650




d


. The resulting form has a front surface


612




d


and a back surface


614




d


. A portion


666




d


of the panel


660




d


forming the front surface of the original panel extends nearly to the fold line


620




a


, and a portion


668




d


of the panel


660




d


forming the back surface of the original panel extends slightly past the fold line. Conversely, a portion


686




d


of the panel


680




d


forming the front surface of the copy panel


618




a


extends slightly past the fold line, overlaps the inner edge of the portion


668




d


, and abuts the inner edge of the portion


666




d


. A portion


688




d


of the panel


680




d


forming the back surface of the copy panel extends nearly to the fold line and abuts the inner edge of the portion


668




d


. In contrast to the embodiments of

FIGS. 6A

,


6


B and


6


C, this configuration does not increase the thickness of the resultant form at the joint (fold line


620




d


). The overlap of portions


668




d


and


686




d


discussed above is readily reversed so that the portions


666




d


and


688




d


would extend slightly past the fold line and overlap each other.





FIG. 6E

shows an alternate technique for producing a virtual single sheet form


610




e


as a laminated structure. As in the technique discussed with respect to

FIG. 6C

, a single CB panel


660




e


is folded and laminated so that its CB-coated surface


662




e


is exposed, forming both sides of the original panel


616




e


, and a single CF-coated panel


680




e


is folded and laminates so that its CF-surface


682




e


is exposed, forming both sides of the copy panel


618




e


. In a manner similar to that shown in

FIG. 3E

, a narrow tape


652




e


bridges the gaps


654




e


between the inner edges of the original and copy panels. However, in this case, the tape


652




e


is located within the interior of the form, between the laminates of the original and copy panels. The uncoated surfaces


662




e


and


682




e


of the panels


660




e


and


680




e


, respectively, are laminated with an adhesive


650




e.






The gap can be of “zero” dimension, resulting in a perfect “butt” joint between the inner edges of the original and copy panels, or it can be small, such as on the order of a few thousandths or tens of thousandths of an inch to facilitate folding of the original panel one way for entering (variable) information on one side thereof and the other way for entering information on the other side thereof. In either case (zero or finite gap), the inner edges of the original and copy panels can be maintained perfectly parallel by first overlapping them then trimming them (not shown).





FIG. 6F

shows an alternate technique for producing a form of laminated construction, similar in many respects to the technique discussed with respect to FIG.


6


B. In this case, a plain paper panel


660




f


(not carbonless coated and not of laminated construction) forming the original panel


616




f


is joined to a CF panel


680




f


folded to form the copy panel


618




f


. The panel


680




f


is formed of CF-coated paper stock, and is folded so that its CF surface


682




f


is exposed to form the front and back surfaces of the copy panel. This configuration relates, but is not limited to the form disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686 wherein the original panel is not coated, the copy panel is coated on both sides with CF, and an intermediate CB-coated transfer panel (not shown) effects image transfer from the original panel to the copy panel. The uncoated surfaces


662




f


and


682




f


are laminated with an adhesive


650




f.







FIG. 6G

shows an alternate technique for producing a form of laminated construction, similar in many respects to the technique discussed for forming the laminated copy panel (


680




c


) of FIG.


6


C. In this case, a single CF-coated panel


680




g


is folded to expose its CF-coated surface


682




g


and conceal its uncoated surface


684




g


. An original panel


616




g


is thus formed to one side of the fold line


620




g


, and a copy panel


618




g


is formed to the other side of the fold line. Both original and copy panels have CF coating


632




g


on both sides, as described with respect to the configuration of, for example, FIG.


4


C. The uncoated surface


684




g


of the panel


680




g


is laminated with an adhesive


650




g.







FIG. 6H

shows a laminating technique for another coating configuration. This configuration relates, but is not limited to the form disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686 wherein the original panel is not coated, the copy panel is coated on both sides with CF, and an intermediate CB-coated transfer panel (not shown) effects image transfer from the original panel to the copy panel. In this case, a sheet of paper stock


680




h


having a CF-coating


632




a


on one side


682




h


thereof (and no carbonless coating on the opposite side


684




h


) is folded in a “Z” configuration so that the ultimately formed original panel


616




h


will be uncoated (


684




h


) and the ultimately formed copy panel


618




h


will have a CF coating


632




a


on both sides.





FIG. 6I

shows a laminated technique for producing a form having a CB C2S (both sides CB-coated) original panel


616




i


and a CF C2S (both sides coated) copy panel


618




i


, such as is disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183 wherein the original panel is CB-coated on both sides and the copy panel is CF-coated on both sides. In this case, a single sheet of CFB (CF-coated front, CB-coated back) paper stock


660




i


is folded in a “Z” configuration so that a portion of the sheet


660




i


to one side of the fold line


620




i


is folded and glued CF-face


664




i


to CF-face so that the CB coating


630




a


is exposed (for entering information) on both sides of the original panel


616




i


, and so that a portion of the sheet


660




i


to the other side of the fold line is folded CB-face


662




i


to CB-face so that the CF coating


632




i


is exposed for reproducing information on both sides of the copy panel


618




i.






Interestingly, as shown in

FIG. 6I

, due to the fact that each of the original and copy panels has two thicknesses of paper (laminate), two thicknesses of CB coating and two thicknesses of CF coating, they are inherently of equal thickness (equivalent weights), which has advantages as discussed hereinabove. This is true for the laminating techniques of

FIGS. 6G through 6J

.





FIG. 6J

shows yet another laminating technique, again a “Z-fold” configuration, producing a plain paper (no carbonless coating) original panel


616




j


and a copy panel


618




j


having Self-Contained (SC) coating


636




j


on both sides, as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189 wherein the original panel is not carbonless coated, and the copy panel is coated with carbonless SC (Self-contained) on both sides. This type of construction is especially advantageous in that the SC-coated copy panel can be made sufficiently thick that the “wrong” side (i.e., the side that is not supposed to be reproducing, unless the form is folded an opposite way) does not reveal an image, for instance on the order of 36# (laminated), or greater (40# in the case of folding 20#) SC-stock. Folded as in

FIG. 6I

, a portion of the sheet


680




j


forming the original panel


616




j


is folded and glued


650




j


) SC-face


682




j


to SC-face, and a portion of the sheet


680




j


forming the copy panel


618




j


is folded plain (uncoated) face


684




j


to plain face (and glued


650




j


). In these “Z” configurations (

FIGS. 6H

,


6


I,


6


J), the outer edges of the sheet may be folded in just short of the fold line (


620




x


), leaving a weak, single thickness area at the fold line for facilitating folding and separating (even without perforations


622




x


) the original from the copy panel.




The above-described laminating techniques advantageously employ relatively thin (e.g., 10-12™) carbonless paper stock that is readily available from most manufacturers. For the adhesive (


650




x


), present adhesives used for stubbing and padding are suitably employed.




In this, as in all cases, the original and copy panels may ultimately be disposed one above the other with a horizontal fold line separating them. Generally, having the original and copy panels side-by-side with a vertical fold line yields a more “user-friendly” form orientation, and is very distinguishable from manifold forms.




In those embodiments where a panel is folded upon itself to expose a coating on one side of the panel for the front and back surfaces of the original or copy panels, fixed information can be pre-printed on the one surface ultimately exposed for writing. In this manner, duplex (two-sided) preprinted information can be provided by printing only one side of a sheet, in an intermediate (prior to laminating) step.




The laminating techniques disclosed herein may advantageously be combined with the any of the coating techniques, the larger copy panel techniques, the coating configurations, and the joining techniques discussed hereinabove. Other folding and laminating arrangements are intended to be within the scope of the invention.




Various improvements to the disclosures of the parent cases are disclosed, which make the self-replicating duplex form more “user friendly” and easier to manufacture.




The detailed descriptions set forth hereinabove essentially “mirror” the detailed descriptions from the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/908,540, and no significant renumbering of the figures and corresponding text is required. The detailed descriptions set forth hereinbelow essentially “mirror” the detailed descriptions from the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/808,847, with the figures and corresponding text renumbered.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

are similar to FIGS. 1A and 1B of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, and show a two-sided, self-replicating form


110


, capable of making multiple two-sided copies of a true, two-sided original.




A first sheet of paper


111


has a front surface


112


and a back surface


114


. The sheet


111


is delineated into a “first” original panel


116


and a “second” copy panel


118


, preferably by a fold


120


, and the fold


120


is preferably provided with a series of perforations (not shown) for aiding in folding and facilitating separating (after use) the two panels


116


,


118


.




A second sheet of paper


161


has a front surface


162


and a back surface


164


. The sheet


161


is delineated into a “third” copy panel


166


and a “fourth” copy panel


168


. The delineation in the second sheet


161


is preferably folded


170


and perforated in a manner similar to the first sheet. The panels


116


,


118


,


166


and


168


are all nominally the same size, e.g. measuring 8½×11 inches. However, as disclosed in parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 591,781, the second copy panel


118


advantageously can be made slightly larger (e.g., wider) than the first original panel


116


. The fourth copy panel may also be larger than the third copy panel, in like manner.




In

FIG. 7A

, the sheet


111


is shown folded one way, and the sheet


161


is shown folded a corresponding one way, and the folded sheet


161


is inserted between the panels of the folded sheet


111


. The figure shows the folded sheet


161


being inserted between the panels of the sheet


111


. With carbonless coatings appropriately disposed on the surfaces of the various panels, discussed below, information (“DOG”) entered on one surface


116




a


of the first original panel


116


(“DOG”, in solid lettering) will be imaged onto a corresponding one surface


166




a


of the third copy panel


166


(“DOG”, in phantom lettering), will further be imaged onto a corresponding one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


(“DOG”, in phantom), and will yet further be imaged onto a corresponding one surface


118




a


of the second copy panel


118


(“DOG”, in phantom). The second sheet


161


is fully inserted (nested between the panels of the folded first sheet) so that its fold


170


is “snugged up” against the fold


120


of the first sheet


111


, to maintain proper alignment of the various panels, thereby ensuring that information entered at a particular location on the original is imaged onto a corresponding particular location on the copy panels.




In

FIG. 7B

, the sheet


111


is shown re-folded another, opposite way, so that the opposite surface


116




b


of the first original panel


116


is exposed for writing. The sheet


161


is also re-folded a corresponding opposite way, and the folded sheet


161


in inserted between the panels of the folded sheet


111


. With appropriate carbonless coatings, discussed below, information (“CAT”) entered on the opposite surface


116




b


of the first original panel


116


(“CAT”, in solid lettering) will be imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


(“CAT”, in phantom lettering), will further be imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


(“CAT”, in phantom), and will yet further be imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface


118




b


of the second copy panel


118


(“CAT”, in phantom). Again, the second sheet


161


is fully inserted so that its fold


170


is “snugged up” against the fold


120


of the first sheet


111


, to maintain proper alignment of the various panels.




Before discussing how the various panels are carbonless coated, it should be noted that the front surface


112


of the overall sheet


111


comprises the one surface


116




a


of the first original panel


116


and the contiguous opposite surface


118




b


of the second copy panel


118


. Similarly, the back surface


114


of the sheet


111


comprises the opposite surface


116




b


of the first original panel


116


and the contiguous one surface


118




a


of the second copy panel


118


. Likewise, the front surface


162


of the sheet


161


comprises the one surface


166




a


of the third copy panel


166


and the contiguous opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


, and the back surface


164


of the sheet


161


comprises the opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


and the contiguous one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


. This is a different way of calling out the parts than has been used previously (i.e., in the parent cases). Generally, in the parent cases, the front/back surfaces of the overall sheet were given descriptive prominence, and we had front (i.e., of the original panel) to back (i.e., of he copy panel) imaging. Herein, the one/opposite surfaces of the various panels are given descriptive prominence, and the one surface to one surface convention is adopted. Irrespective of whether the surfaces of the overall sheet or of the individual panels are given descriptive prominence, the form functions just the same.





FIG. 7C

, which is similar to FIG. 1C of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, shows one embodiment of carbonless coating the sheets


111


and


161


. The cross-section is “exploded”, in the sense that the single sheet nature of the sheets


111


and


161


is not shown, nor ar the folds


120


and


170


illustrated.




In this embodiment, the panels are “fully coated”, and information can be entered at any location on either surface of the original panel


116


, and will be reproduced at corresponding locations on corresponding surfaces of the copy panels.




The opposite surface


116




b


of the first original panel


116


is coated over substantially its entire area with a carbonless CB image-transferring coating selected from a first reactive system (hereinafter “CB


1


”). The one surface


166




a


of the third copy panel


166


is coated with a carbonless CF image-revealing coating selected from the first reactive system (hereinafter “CF


1


”), so that first information (“DOG”) entered on the one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


will be imaged by the CB


1


coating on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


onto the CF


1


-coated one surface


166




a


of the third copy panel


166


. See arrow “a”.




The opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


is coated over substantially its entire area with a “CB


2


” coating, selected from a second carbonless system that is non-reactive with the first carbonless system. The one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


is coated over substantially its entire area with a “CF


2


” coating from the second carbonless system, so that writing on the one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


will further be imaged onto the one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


. See arrow “b”.




The opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CB


1


coating, and the one surface


118




a


of the second copy panel


118


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CF


1


coating, so that writing on the one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


will further be imaged onto the one surface


118




a


of the second copy panel


118


. See arrow “c”.




Two mutually non-reactive carbonless systems are discussed in the aforementioned parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/497,219. One system comprises CB


1


and CF


1


, which react with one another. A second system comprises CF


2


and CB


2


, which react with one another. By definition, CB


1


does not react with CF


2


, and CB


2


does not react with CF


1


. As will be evident from the following discussion, a third carbonless system comprising CB


3


and CF


3


is employed, and is at least partially mutually non-reactive with the first and second carbonless systems. As will become evident, it is important that the CB


3


component of the third carbonless system does not react with either of CF


1


or CF


2


. However, it is immaterial whether the CF


3


component reacts with either of CB


1


or CB


2


, since the disclosed form construction does not required that the CF


3


and either of CB


1


or CB


2


components are both disposed (mixed) on the same surface of a panel or brought into contact with one another by the intimate contact of two panels.




As mentioned above, for entering second information (“CAT”) in the other direction, namely from the opposite surface


116




b


of the first original panel


116


to the opposite surfaces


166




b


,


168




b


and


118




b


of the third, fourth and second copy panels


166


,


168


and


118


, respectively, the panels are re-folded, and the second sheet


161


is re-inserted between the panels of the first sheet


111


. The sheets


111


and


161


are carbonless coated as follows.




The one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CB


1


component of the first carbonless system. The opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


is coated with a CF


1


component from the first carbonless system. In this manner, writing on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


will be imaged by the CB


1


coating on the one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


onto the opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


. See arrow “d”.




It should be noted that the surfaces of the third copy panel


166


are coated with a mixture of CB


2


and CF


1


. These two carbonless system components (CB


2


and CF


1


) are mixed and applied in a manner similar to self-contained (“SC”) coatings, but they do not react with one another. Again, reference is made to the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/497,219.




The one surface


166




a


of the third copy panel


166


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CB


2


component, and the opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CF


2


component, so that writing on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


will further be imaged onto the opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


. See arrow “e”. Again, the CF


2


and CB


1


components can be mixed in a manner similar to an SC coating, but they will not autogenously react with one another.




The one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CB


3


component from a third carbonless system. The CB


3


component is not reactive with the CF


1


and CF


2


components of the first and second carbonless systems, respectively. The opposite surface


118




b


of the second copy panel


118


is coated over substantially its entire area with a CF


3


coating, reactive with the CB


3


component, so that writing on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


will further be imaged onto the opposite surface


118




b


of the second copy panel


118


. See arrow “f”.




In the event that the CB coatings on the original panel


116


are not endorsable, and exhibit a tendency to cause pen-skipping, it is also possible to pattern the coatings on the original and copy panels. As will be seen in the description of

FIG. 7D

, below, this eliminates coatings from selected writing areas on the original panel


116


where information will be entered—while retaining coatings in selected coating areas behind the selected writing areas.





FIG. 7D

, similar to FIG. 1D of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, shows the form


110


of

FIGS. 7A and 7B

with patterned carbonless coatings. CB and CF components from a single carbonless system are employed.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


132


on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


which is directly behind a selected writing area


134


on the one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


144


on the one surface


166




a


of the second copy panel


166


, for revealing an image of first information (“DOG”) entered upon the selected writing area


134


. See arrow “a”. The area


144


is aligned with the area


134


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


142


on the opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


which is directly behind the selected area


144


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


154


on the one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


, for revealing an image of writing (“DOG”) impressed upon the selected writing area


134


. See arrow “b”. The area


154


is aligned with the areas


134


,


132


,


144


and


142


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


152


on the opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


which is directly behind the selected area


154


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


164


on the one surface


118




a


of the second copy panel


118


, for revealing an image of writing (“DOG”) impressed upon the selected writing area


134


. The area


164


is aligned with the areas


134


,


132


,


144


,


142


,


154


and


152


.




The selected areas


134


,


132


,


144


,


142


,


154


,


152


and


164


comprise only a portion of the respective panel surfaces, and may be one contiguous area or a plurality of non-contiguous areas. As will be seen, the remaining areas on the surfaces of the panels are “reserved” for imaging in the opposite direction.




As mentioned above (FIGS.


7


A and


7


B), the sheets are re-folded and re-inserted for entering second information (“CAT”) on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


, and reproducing the second information on corresponding opposite surfaces of the copy panels.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


133


on the one surface


116




a


of the original panel


116


which is directly behind a selected writing area


135


on the opposite surface


116




b


of the original panel


116


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected coating area


145


on the opposite surface


166




b


of the third copy panel


166


, for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


135


. See arrow “d”. The area


145


is aligned with the area


133


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


143


on the one surface


166




a


of the third copy panel


166


which is directly behind the selected area


145


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


155


on the opposite surface


168




b


of the fourth copy panel


168


, for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


135


. See arrow “e”. The area


155


is aligned with the areas


135


,


133


,


145


and


143


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


153


on the one surface


168




a


of the fourth copy panel


168


which is directly behind the selected area


155


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


183


on the opposite surface


118




b


of the second copy panel


118


, for revealing an image of writing (“DOG”) impressed upon the selected writing area


135


. See arrow “f”. The area


163


is aligned with the areas


135


,


133


,


145


,


143


,


155


and


153


.




The first selected areas


134


,


132


,


144


,


142


,


154


,


152


and


164


are “offset”, or non-aligned front-to-back, on a per panel basis with the second selected areas


135


,


133


,


145


,


143


,


155


,


153


and


163


.




Although the form


110


, described hereinabove, creates a “true-original” having original writing on both sides of the original panel, it is evidently somewhat complex to use. For example, if the second sheet


161


is not re-folded and inserted correctly between the panels of the re-folded first sheet


111


, the desired result may not be achieved. Hence, it is useful to create a form having two interleaved (nested) folded single sheets that is easier to use. As will be seen in the description that follows, the result is a “two-way rite” type form, wherein none of the panels have original writing on both sides. Hence, the term “original” panel is not employed. Rather, the terms “first”, “second”, “third” and “fourth” panels are employed. But for the arrangement of carbonless coatings, and the way in which the form is used, the basic construction of the form set


200


is very similar to the form set


100


of

FIGS. 7A

,


7


B and


7


D.





FIGS. 8A-8C

, similar to FIGS. 2A-2C of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, show a form set


210


comprising two individual sheets


211


and


261


.




A first sheet of paper


211


has a front surface


212


and a back surface


214


. The sheet


211


is delineated into a “first” panel


216


and a “second” panel


218


, preferably by a fold


220


, and the fold


220


is preferably provided with a series of perforations (not shown) for aiding in folding and facilitating separating (after use) the two panels


216


,


218


.




A second sheet of paper


261


has a front surface


262


and a back surface


264


. The sheet


261


is delineated into a “third” panel


266


and a “fourth” panel


268


. The delineation in the second sheet


261


is preferably folded


270


and perforated in a manner similar to the first sheet. The panels


216


,


218


,


266


and


268


are all nominally the same size, e.g. measuring 8½×11 inches. However, as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/591,781, the second panel


218


is advantageously slightly larger (e.g., wider) than the first panel


216


.




In

FIG. 8A

, the sheet


211


is folded one way, and the sheet


261


is folded a corresponding one way, and the folded sheet


261


is inserted (nested) between the panels of the folded sheet


211


. The figure shows the sheet


261


being inserted between the panels of the sheet


211


. With carbonless coatings appropriately disposed on the surfaces of the various panels, discussed below, information (“DOG”) entered on one surface


116




a


of the first panel


116


(“DOG”, in solid lettering) will be imaged onto a corresponding one surface


266




a


of the third panel


266


(“DOG”, in phantom lettering), will further be imaged onto a corresponding one surface


268




a


of the fourth panel


268


(“DOG”, in phantom), and will yet further be imaged onto a corresponding one surface


218




a


of the second panel


218


(“DOG”, in phantom). The second sheet


261


is fully inserted so that its fold


270


is “snugged up” against the fold


220


of the first sheet


211


, to maintain proper alignment of the various panels.




In

FIG. 8B

, the sheets


211


and


261


remain folded and interleaved as in

FIG. 8A

, but together they are flipped over in their entirety so that the opposite surface


218




b


of the second panel


218


is exposed (up) for writing. With appropriate carbonless coatings, discussed below, information (“CAT”) entered on the opposite surface


218




b


of the second panel


218


(“CAT”, in solid lettering) will be imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface


268




b


of the fourth panel


268


(“CAT”, in phantom lettering), will further be imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface


266




b


of the third panel


266


(“CAT”, in phantom), and will yet further be imaged onto the corresponding opposite surface


216




b


of the first panel


216


(“CAT”, in phantom).




Hence, the first panel


216


has original first writing (DOG) on its one surface


216




a


, and duplicate first writing (CAT) imaged onto its opposite surface


216




b


. Similarly, the second panel


268


has original second writing (CAT) on its opposite surface


268




b


, and duplicate first writing (DOG) imaged onto its one surface


266




a


. The third and fourth panels of the second sheet


261


have duplicate first writing (DOG) imaged onto their one surfaces


266




a


and


268




a


, respectively, and have duplicate second writing (CAT) imaged onto their opposite surfaces


266




b


and


268




b


, respectively. These are the hallmarks of a “two-way rite” type system, in that none of the elements (in this case, panels—usually individual sheets) has original first and second writing on both sides (surfaces).




Before discussing how the various panels are carbonless coated, it should be noted that the front surface


212


of the sheet


211


comprises the one surface


216




a


of the first panel


216


and the contiguous opposite surface


218




b


of the second panel


218


. Similarly, the back surface


214


of the sheet


211


comprises the opposite surface


216




b


of the first panel


216


and the contiguous one surface


218




a


of the second panel


218


. Likewise, the front surface


262


of the sheet


261


comprises the one surface


266




a


of the third panel


266


and the contiguous opposite surface


268




b


of the fourth panel


268


, and the back surface


264


of the sheet


261


comprises the opposite surface


266




b


of the third panel


266


and the contiguous one surface


268




a


of the fourth panel


168


.





FIG. 8C

shows how the various panels are carbonless coated to achieve the two-sided, self-replicating functions set forth above. The carbonless coating components are applied to selected areas (“patterning”), rather than to substantially the entire surface (“fully-coated”) of a panel, and CB and CF components from a single carbonless system are employed.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


232


on the opposite surface


216




b


of the first panel


216


which is directly behind a selected writing area


234


on the one surface


216




a


of the first panel


116


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


244


on the one surface


266




a


of the third panel


266


, for revealing an image of first information (“DOG”) entered upon the selected writing area


234


. See arrow “a”. The area


244


is aligned with the areas


234


and


232


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


242


on the opposite surface


266




b


of the third panel


266


which is directly behind the selected area


244


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


254


on the one surface


268




a


of the fourth panel


168


, for revealing an image of writing (“DOG”) impressed upon the selected writing area


234


. See arrow “b”. The area


254


is aligned with the areas


234


,


232


,


244


and


242


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


252


on the opposite surface


268




b


of the fourth panel


168


which is directly behind the selected area


254


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


264


on the one surface


218




a


of the second panel


218


, for revealing an image of writing (“DOG”) impressed upon the selected writing area


234


. The area


264


is aligned with the areas


234


,


232


,


244


,


242


,


254


and


252


.




The selected areas


234


,


232


,


244


,


242


,


254


,


252


and


264


comprise only a portion of the respective panel surfaces, and may be one contiguous area or a plurality of non-contiguous areas. As will be seen, the remaining areas on the surfaces of the panels are “reserved” for imaging in the opposite direction.




As mentioned above (FIGS.


8


A and


8


B), the sheets are not re-folded, nor are they re-inserted for entering second information (“CAT”) on the opposite surface


118




b


of the second panel, and reproducing the second information on corresponding opposite surfaces of the fourth, third and first panels. Rather, they are simply re-oriented in their entirety, so that the opposite surface


218




b


of the second panel


218


is exposed for writing.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


233


on the one surface


218




a


of the second panel


218


which is directly behind a selected writing area


235


on the opposite surface


218




b


of the second panel


218


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected coating area


245


on the opposite surface


268




b


of the fourth panel


268


, for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


235


. See arrow “d”. The area


245


is aligned with the areas


235


and


233


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


243


on the one surface


268




a


of the fourth panel


268


which is directly behind the selected area


245


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


255


on the opposite surface


266




b


of the third panel


266


, for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


235


. See arrow “e”. The area


255


is aligned with the areas


235


,


233


,


245


and


243


.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


253


on the one surface


266




a


of the third panel


266


which is directly behind the selected area


255


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


265


on the opposite surface


216




b


of the first panel


216


, for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


235


. See arrow “f”. The area


265


is aligned with the areas


235


,


233


,


245


,


243


,


255


and


253


.




The first selected areas


234


,


232


,


244


,


242


,


254


,


252


and


264


are offset from the second selected areas


235


,


233


,


245


,


243


,


255


,


253


and


265


.





FIGS. 9A-9C

, similar to FIGS. 3A-3C of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, illustrate a simpler two-way rite type form having only one single sheet of paper, folded to form two panels. In essence, the sheet


211


of the previously-described embodiment is employed for this purpose.




A sheet of paper


311


has a front surface


312


and a back surface


314


. The sheet


311


is delineated into a “first” panel


316


and a “second” panel


318


, preferably by a fold


320


, and the fold


320


is preferably provided with a series of perforations (not shown) for aiding in folding and facilitating separating (after use) the two panels


316


,


318


.




The panels


316


and


318


are nominally the same size, e.g. measuring 8½×11 inches. However, as disclosed in parent U.S. application Ser. No. 591,781, the fold


320


may be formed slightly off center so that the second panel


318


is slightly larger than the first panel


316


.




In

FIG. 9A

, the sheet


311


is folded and is positioned in one orientation, so that information (“DOG”) entered on the one surface


316




a


of the first panel


316


will be imaged onto the corresponding one surface


318




a


of the second panel


318


.




In

FIG. 9B

, the sheet


311


remains folded as in

FIG. 9A

, and is re-positioned, so that information (“CAT”) entered on the opposite surface


318




b


of the second panel


318


will be imaged (reproduced) onto the corresponding opposite surface


316




b


of the first panel.




Again, since neither of the panels


316


or


318


contain original information on both sides, the form


300


must be considered to be of the “two-way rite” genre.





FIG. 9C

shows how the various panels are carbonless coated to achieve the two-sided, self-replicating functions set forth above. The carbonless coating components are applied to selected areas (“patterning”), rather than to substantially the entire surface of a panel (“fully-coated”), and CB and CF components from a single carbonless system are employed.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


332


on the opposite surface


316




b


of the first panel


316


which is directly behind a selected writing area


334


on the one surface


316




a


of the first panel


316


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected area


364


on the one surface


318




a


of the second panel


318


, for revealing an image of first information (“DOG”) entered upon the selected writing area


334


. See arrow “a”. The area


364


is aligned with the areas


334


and


332


.




The selected areas


334


,


332


and


364


comprise only a portion of the respective panel surfaces, and may be one contiguous area or a plurality of non-contiguous areas. As will be seen, the remaining areas on the surfaces of the panels are “reserved” for imaging in the opposite direction.




As mentioned above (FIGS.


9


A and


9


B), the sheet is not re-folded for entering second information (“CAT”) on the opposite surface


318




b


of the second panel, and reproducing the second information onto the corresponding opposite surfaces of the first panel. Rather, the sheet


311


is simply re-oriented in its entirety, so that the opposite surface


218




b


of the second panel


318


is exposed for writing.




A carbonless CB component is applied to a selected coating area


333


on the one surface


318




a


of the second panel


318


which is directly behind a selected writing area


335


on the opposite surface


318




b


of the second panel


318


. A carbonless CF component is applied to a selected coating area


365


on the opposite surface


316




b


of the first panel


316


, for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


335


. See arrow “d”. The area


365


is aligned with the areas


335


and


333


.




The first selected areas


334


,


332


and


364


are offset from the second selected areas


335


,


333


and


365


.





FIGS. 10A-10C

, similar to FIGS. 4A-4C of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, illustrate a true-original type form


400


, having only one single sheet of paper, folded to form two panels.




A single sheet of paper


411


has a front surface


412


and a back surface


414


. The sheet


411


is delineated into an “original” panel


416


and a “copy” panel


418


, preferably by a fold


420


, and the fold


420


is preferably provided with a series of perforations (not shown) for aiding in folding and facilitating separating (after use) the two panels


416


and


418


.




The panels


416


and


418


are nominally the same size, e.g. measuring 8½×11 inches. However, as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/591,781, the fold


420


may be formed slightly off center so that the copy panel


418


is slightly larger than the original panel


416


. This is advantageous when it comes to re-folding the sheet for entering second information (“CAT”).




In

FIG. 10A

, the sheet


411


is folded one way, so that first information (“DOG”) entered on the one surface


416




a


of the original panel


416


will be imaged onto the corresponding one surface


418




a


of the copy panel


418


.




In

FIG. 10B

, the sheet


411


is folded in an opposite direction from that of

FIG. 10A

, exposing the opposite surface


416




b


of the original panel


416


, so that second information (“CAT”) entered on the opposite surface


416




b


of the original panel


416


will be imaged (reproduced) onto the corresponding opposite surface


418




b


of the copy panel.




Since the original panel


416


has original first and second information on its one and opposite surfaces, the form


400


must be considered to be of the “true-original” genre.





FIG. 10C

shows how the various panels are carbonless coated to achieve the functions set forth above.




Reference is made to the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189, wherein FIGS. 1L-1M illustrate using patterned self-contained (SC) carbonless coating on the copy panel (


68


′), and leaving the original panel (


66


′) entirely uncoated.




Reference is also made to the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183, wherein the sentence bridging pages 8-9 discloses “coating only the back surface of the original [panel]”—thereby postulating a “transfer-onto-plain-paper” type carbonless coating. U.S. Pat. No. 4,352,855 discloses such a “transfer-onto-plain-paper” type coating, hereinafter referred to as “anti-SC”.




A carbonless anti-SC (or “SC


−1


”) coating is applied to a selected coating area


432


on the opposite surface


416




b


of the original panel


416


which is directly behind a selected writing area


434


on the one surface


416




a


of the original panel


416


. A selected area


464


on the one surface


418




a


of the copy panel


418


is un-coated, and is aligned with the areas


434


and


432


(when the sheet


411


is folded one way), for revealing an image of writing (“DOG”) impressed upon the selected writing area


434


. See arrow “a”. The selected areas


434


,


432


and


464


may each comprise multiple discontinuous aligned areas on the respective surfaces of the panels.




The sheet


411


is then re-folded for entering second information (“CAT”) on the opposite surface


416




b


of the original panel


416


, and creating a carbonless copy of that information on the opposite surface


418




b


of the copy panel.




A carbonless anti-SC (or “SC


−1


”) coating is applied to a selected coating area


433


on the one surface


416




a


of the original panel


416


which is directly behind a selected writing area


435


on the opposite surface


416




b


of the original panel


416


. A selected area


465


on the opposite surface


418




b


of the copy panel


418


is un-coated, and is aligned with the areas


435


and


433


(when the sheet


411


is folded the opposite way), for revealing an image of writing (“CAT”) impressed upon the selected writing area


435


. See arrow “b”. The selected areas


435


,


433


and


465


may each comprise multiple discontinuous aligned areas on the respective surfaces of the panels.




The first selected areas


434


,


432


and


464


are offset from the second selected areas


435


,


433


and


465


.





FIGS. 11A-11C

, similar to FIGS. 5A-5C of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, illustrate a true-original type form


500


, having mainly only a single sheet of paper, folded to form two panels, an “original” panel


516


and a “copy” panel


518


.




Attention is directed to the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686, continued as the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/723,690, which discloses in

FIGS. 2A-2C

thereof that the original panel (


216


) is not coated, the copy panel (


218


) is coated on both sides with CF, and a separate image-transferring sheet (


250


) coated on at least one side with CB is interposed between the panels to effect image-transfer between the original panel and the copy panel.




An advantage of the form disclosed in the parent application is that there are no coatings, hence no potential pen-skipping problems associated with writing on the original panel. While patterning the coatings also avoids this problem, patterning imposes its own constraints on the manufacture and limitations on the use of carbonless forms.




The present invention is very similar to the forms previously disclosed, with the exception that the user can select from at least two different image-transferring sheets to cause different color imaging on the copy panel. For example, it may be desirable in some circumstances to have the copy images reveal themselves in a blue color on one or both sides (surfaces) of the copy panel, and in other circumstances to reveal themselves in a black color on one or both sides (surfaces) of the copy panel. Blue and black are well known carbonless image-revealing colors.




With reference to

FIGS. 11A-11C

, a single sheet of paper


511


has a front surface


512


and a back surface


514


. The sheet


511


is delineated into an “original” panel


516


and a “copy” panel


518


, preferably by a fold


520


, and the fold


520


is preferably provided with a series of perforations (not shown) for aiding in folding and facilitating separating (after use) the two panels


516


and


518


.




The panels


516


and


518


are nominally the same size, e.g. measuring 8½×11 inches. However, as disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/591,781, the fold


520


may be formed slightly off center so that the copy panel


518


is slightly larger (e.g., wider) than the original panel


516


. This is advantageous when it comes to re-folding the sheet for entering second information (“CAT”) on the previously non-exposed surface (i.e.,


516




b


) of the original panel.




In

FIG. 11A

, the sheet


511


is folded one way, so that first information (“DOG”) entered on the one surface


516




a


of the original panel


516


will be imaged onto the corresponding one surface


518




a


of the copy panel


518


.




In

FIG. 11B

, the sheet


511


is folded in an opposite direction from that of

FIG. 11A

, exposing the opposite surface


516




b


of the original panel


516


, so that second information (“CAT”) entered on the opposite surface


516




b


of the original panel


516


will be imaged (reproduced) onto the corresponding opposite surface


518




b


of the copy panel


518


.




One of two separate image-transferring sheets


550


or


560


is interposed between the original and copy panels, when folded either way, to effect image-transferring, and may be discarded after use.




Since the original panel


516


has original first and second information on its one and opposite surfaces, the form


500


must be considered to be of the “true-original” genre.





FIG. 11C

shows how the sheet


511


and sheets


550


/


560


are carbonless coated to achieve the functions set forth above.




The inventors have recognized that various CB coatings will cause various color images on a specific CF coating. For example, waxy OPAS (from MEAD) CB images blue on black “PRT” (mill stock) CF coated stock, and aqueous OPAS (“LCB”, from MEAD) images black on the same PRT stock. Other combinations of coatings from various manufacturers have been found to exhibit this characteristic.




According to the invention, a single “standard” sheet


511


is employed, and the user is free to select from at least two different image-transferring sheets


550


or


560


to exercise control over the color of the images on the copy panel


518


. The inventors envision that a blue or a black imaging CB image-transferring sheet would be used for imaging onto both sides of the copy panel, but a user may also use a blue-imaging CB image-transferring sheet


550


the one way (“DOG”) and a black-imaging CB image-transferring sheet


550


′ the other way (“CAT”), or vice-versa. In this case, the user would want both color image-transferring sheets


550


and


560


on hand. They could easily be distinguished by color-coding, or other appropriate distinguishing marks. To this end, it is proposed that a blue-imaging image-transferring sheet be colored blue, and that a black-imaging image transferring sheet be colored grey (i.e., a light shade of black). In either case, the image-transferring sheet preferably would be dissimilarly colored from the usual white original and pink or canary copy.




As shown in

FIG. 11C

, the original panel


516


is un-coated (i.e., does not have either component of a carbonless system). The copy panel


518


is coated on both sides


518




a


and


518




b


with a CF component capable of revealing an image in at least two visibly different colors, depending upon the particular CB employed.




The image-transferring sheet


550


is coated on at least one side


550




b


with a carbonless CB component revealing itself on the CF-coated copy panel


518


in one color (e.g., blue). It can be also coated on both sides with the same CB component.




The image-transferring sheet


560


is coated on at least one side


560




b


with a carbonless CB′ component revealing itself on the CF-coated copy panel


518


in another, dissimilar color (e.g., black). It can be also coated on both sides with the same CB′ component.




As set forth above, the user would select from one of the sheets


550


,


560


for imaging in one direction (“DOG”), and would select the same or the other sheet for imaging in the opposite direction (“CAT”). Since, whichever way the sheet


511


is folded, only the down-facing surface of the image-transferring sheet


550


or


560


is operative, as mentioned above, the up-facing surface can be coated with the same component as the down-facing surface.




With reference to

FIG. 1D

, similar to FIG. 5D of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, a single intermediate transfer sheet


570


can advantageously be coated with a CB component revealing itself in one color on one side


570




b


, and with a CB′ component revealing itself in another dissimilar color on another side


570




a


. With such a single image-transferring sheet (rather than two different sheets


550


,


560


), the user would simply select which surface of the intermediate transfer sheet


570


is facing down when it is inserted between the folded (“DOG”) and re-folded (“CAT”) sheet


511


to exercise control over the color in which writing is reproduced.




Although the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and in the description thereof, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character—it being understood that only preferred embodiments have been shown and described, and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.



Claims
  • 1. A single sheet of paper having two surfaces and capable of reproducing information entered on both of its two surfaces, comprising:a single sheet of paper having two surfaces, one of which is a front surface, an other of which is a back surface, a first portion of the single sheet of paper being an original panel having a front surface which is the front surface of the single sheet of paper and having a back surface which is the back surface of the single sheet of paper, a second portion of the single sheet of paper being a copy panel having a front surface which is the front surface of the single sheet of paper and having a back surface which is the back surface of the single sheet of paper; a first carbonless coating applied only to the original panel, on the front and back surfaces thereof; a second carbonless coating applied only to the copy panel, on the front and back surfaces thereof; and the first and second carbonless coatings being selected from a common carbonless system wherein the second carbonless coating is capable of revealing an image when the first carbonless coating is pressed against the second carbonless coating; wherein: when the single sheet of paper is folded in a first direction, so that the original panel is disposed over the copy panel and the front surface of the original panel is exposed for entering first information thereon, the first information entered on the front surface of the original panel causes the first carbonless coating on the back surface of the original panel to press against the second carbonless coating on the back surface of the copy panel, thereby resulting in the second coating on the back surface of the copy panel revealing an image of the first information entered on the front surface of the original panel; and when the single sheet of paper is folded in a second direction, so that the original panel is disposed over the copy panel and the back surface of the original panel is exposed for entering second information thereon, the second information entered on the back surface of the original panel causes the first carbonless coating on the front surface of the original panel to press against the second carbonless coating on the front surface of the copy panel, thereby resulting in the second coating on the front surface of the copy panel revealing an image of the second information entered on the back surface of the original panel.
  • 2. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 1, further comprising:a fold between the original panel and the copy panel.
  • 3. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 1, further comprising:a line of perforations between the original panel and the copy panel.
  • 4. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 1, wherein:the first carbonless coating is a CF coating; and the second carbonless coating is a CB coating.
  • 5. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 1, wherein:the copy panel is larger than the original panel.
  • 6. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 1, wherein:the single sheet of paper has a first size and is formed of an oversize sheet of paper having a second size which is four times the first size; and the oversize sheet is folded and laminated upon itself to form the single sheet of paper.
  • 7. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 6, wherein:the oversize sheet of paper has two surfaces, one of which is a front surface, an other of which is a back surface, and the oversize sheet of paper has four portions, one of which is a first end portion, one of which is a second end portion, one of which is a first middle portion adjacent the first end portion, one of which is a second middle portion adjacent the second end portion; the first end portion is folded and laminated to the first middle portion to form the original panel of the single sheet of paper; and the second end portion is folded and laminated to the second middle portion to for the copy panel of the single sheet of paper.
  • 8. A single sheet of paper, according to claim 6, wherein:the oversize sheet of paper has two surfaces, one of which is a front surface, an other of which is a back surface; the first carbonless coating is applied only to the front surface of the oversize sheet of paper; and the second carbonless coating is applied only to the back surface of the oversize sheet of paper.
  • 9. Carbonless form for reproducing information entered on both sides of an original panel onto both sides of a copy panel, comprising:an original panel having a front surface and a back surface, and coated with carbonless CB coating on its front and back surfaces; a separate copy panel having a front surface and a back surface, and coated with carbonless CF coating on its front and back surfaces; and means for joining the original and copy panels along an edge of each to form a virtual single sheet of paper.
  • 10. Carbonless form for reproducing information entered on both sides of an original panel onto both sides of a copy panel, comprising:an original panel having a front surface and a back surface, and coated with carbonless CF coating on its front and back surfaces; a copy panel having a front surface and a back surface, and coated with carbonless CF coating on its front and back surfaces; and an intermediate transfer panel coated on at least one of its front and back surfaces with carbonless CB coating.
  • 11. Carbonless form according to claim 10, wherein:the intermediate transfer sheet is coated on only one surface with carbonless CB coating.
  • 12. Carbonless form according to claim 10, wherein:the intermediate transfer sheet is coated on one side with carbonless CB coating and on the other side with carbonless CF coating.
  • 13. Apparatus according to claim 10, further comprising:a portfolio containing the sheet having the original and copy panels, and containing the intermediate transfer panel.
  • 14. Apparatus according to claim 13, further comprising:envelopes contained in the portfolio.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/077,290, filed Jun. 15, 1993 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,265, issued Feb. 28, 1995). This application is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538, filed Sep. 24, 1993 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,288, issued Mar. 7, 1995). The aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/077,290 is a division of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/908,540, filed Jun. 29, 1992 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,224,897, issued Jul. 6, 1993), which is a continuation of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/591,781, filed Oct. 2, 1990 (status, abandoned). The aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/126,538 is a division of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/808,847, filed Dec. 16, 1991 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,248,279, issued Sep. 28, 1993). This application also functions as a “division” of both of the aforementioned commonly-owned, copending U.S. patent application Nos. 08/077,290 and 08/126,538, in that it is largely directed to subject matter which was restricted (and subsequently withdrawn from consideration) in those two parent cases, each of which depends variously back to commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183, filed Apr. 6, 1989 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,879, issued Jul. 7, 1992). The aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/591,781 is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/497,219, filed on Mar. 22, 1990 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,668, issued Oct. 13, 1992), which is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/494,565, filed on Feb. 26, 1990 and accorded a filing date of Mar. 16, 1990 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,137,494, issued Aug. 11, 1992), which is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189, filed Nov. 13, 1989 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,197,922, issued Mar. 30, 1993), which is a continuation-in-part of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/334,183. The aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/808,847 is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned U.S. patent application No. 07/723,690, filed on Jun. 24, 1991 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,135,437, issued Aug. 4, 1992), which is a continuation of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/484,686, filed Feb. 23, 1990 (status abandoned), which is a continuation-in-part of the aforementioned commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/436,189.

US Referenced Citations (178)
Number Name Date Kind
RE. 30041 Maalouf Jul 1979
RE. 30116 Maalouf Oct 1979
RE. 31695 Zink Oct 1984
371126 Currie Oct 1887
396560 Harrison Jan 1889
418455 Gray Dec 1889
419359 Rogers Jan 1890
445368 Campbell Jan 1891
664384 Cooke Dec 1900
683782 Morland Oct 1901
756258 Mallin Apr 1904
765408 Wildey Jul 1904
797302 Meacham Aug 1905
897783 Reynolds Sep 1908
971283 Krueger Sep 1910
972549 Lewis Oct 1910
1101262 Edmonds Jun 1914
1187682 Trueman Jun 1916
1301834 Gilman Apr 1919
1392748 Davidson Oct 1921
1468094 Wherry Sep 1923
1873997 Davis Aug 1932
1980318 Caton Nov 1934
1980319 Caton Nov 1934
2006034 Stevens Jun 1935
2035768 Sherman et al. Mar 1936
2084221 Schutz Jun 1937
2093086 Luzzatto Sep 1937
2098706 Lawson et al. Nov 1937
2118888 Lewis et al. May 1938
2131381 Linderman Sep 1938
2148886 Wanser Feb 1939
2168098 Groák Aug 1939
2194670 Neu Mar 1940
2211532 Biggs Aug 1940
2220842 Hano Nov 1940
2226722 Jones Dec 1940
2257766 Sherman Oct 1941
2262347 Sturc Nov 1941
2264119 Lichter Nov 1941
2327215 Potter Aug 1943
2458729 Politzer Jan 1949
2470586 Tathwell May 1949
2503680 Newman Apr 1950
2548366 Green et al. Apr 1951
2550466 Green et al. Apr 1951
2550468 Green et al. Apr 1951
2550469 Green et al. Apr 1951
2606775 Newman Aug 1952
2618573 Green Nov 1952
2637571 Tilly May 1953
2694429 Berger Nov 1954
2712507 Green Jul 1955
2802678 Bright Aug 1957
2869898 Martin Jan 1959
2870040 Gill Jan 1959
2907585 Sornberger Oct 1959
2980447 Weger Apr 1961
3016308 Macaulay Jan 1962
3104799 Steidinger Sep 1963
3163447 Seekins Dec 1964
3364052 Martino Jan 1968
3376154 Campbell et al. Apr 1968
3429827 Ruus Feb 1969
3481759 Ostlie Dec 1969
3539375 Baum Nov 1970
3625547 Burke Dec 1971
3682681 Kunkel Aug 1972
3769057 Lin Oct 1973
3769062 Ishige et al. Oct 1973
3825467 Phillips, Jr. Jul 1974
3854654 Van Malderghem Dec 1974
3902655 Huffman Sep 1975
3908063 Rosendale et al. Sep 1975
3945870 Johnsen Mar 1976
3955750 Huffman May 1976
3963853 Hughes et al. Jun 1976
3968299 Angleman Jul 1976
3981523 Maalouf Sep 1976
3988971 Steidinger Nov 1976
3996406 Alsop Dec 1976
4000916 Lacas Jan 1977
4036511 Maalouf Jul 1977
4039046 D'Luhy Aug 1977
4045053 Carriere Aug 1977
4046404 Treier Sep 1977
4056191 Weisenfluh Nov 1977
4062567 Macaulay Dec 1977
4063754 Shackle et al. Dec 1977
4081127 Steidinger Mar 1978
4081188 Westcott Mar 1978
4091122 Davis et al. May 1978
4095695 Steidinger Jun 1978
4097619 Davis et al. Jun 1978
4111461 Levensalor Sep 1978
4112138 Davis et al. Sep 1978
4113281 Halse Sep 1978
4121857 Halse Oct 1978
4126334 Van Malderghem Nov 1978
4137343 Davis et al. Jan 1979
4138302 D'Luhy Feb 1979
4139218 Davis et al. Feb 1979
4139392 Davis et al. Feb 1979
4143890 Davis et al. Mar 1979
4143891 Neubauer Mar 1979
4165101 Sternberg Aug 1979
4168851 Halse Sep 1979
4172605 Welsch et al. Oct 1979
4178018 Halse Dec 1979
4198446 Goetz Apr 1980
4199174 Sornberger Apr 1980
4203619 Sanders May 1980
4208460 Knechtle et al. Jun 1980
4217162 Glanz Aug 1980
4282275 Werner Aug 1981
4336067 Shackle et al. Jun 1982
4343494 Ehrhardt et al. Aug 1982
4352855 Hiraishi et al. Oct 1982
4354449 Zink Oct 1982
4361108 Robillard et al. Nov 1982
4381120 Golden Apr 1983
4397483 Hiraishi et al. Aug 1983
4407524 Trautlein Oct 1983
4425386 Chang Jan 1984
4448445 Chang et al. May 1984
4455327 Yoshida et al. Jun 1984
4501559 Griswold et al. Feb 1985
4512595 Breen Apr 1985
4533160 Malone Aug 1985
4556390 Rahn et al. Dec 1985
4566720 Goldman et al. Jan 1986
4576399 White et al. Mar 1986
4583765 Messinger Apr 1986
4593935 Kearns Jun 1986
4597993 Okada et al. Jul 1986
4614362 Breen et al. Sep 1986
4614363 Breen Sep 1986
4636818 Jerabek Jan 1987
4642662 Torii et al. Feb 1987
4657783 Tatt et al. Apr 1987
4690433 Showers et al. Sep 1987
4715620 Thompson Dec 1987
4722553 Evans Feb 1988
4740015 Caprio et al. Apr 1988
4745097 Maekawa et al. May 1988
4762342 Thompson Aug 1988
4814319 Matsumoto et al. Mar 1989
4846594 Riskin Jul 1989
4853364 Liang et al. Aug 1989
4859561 Metz et al. Aug 1989
4871193 Wörndli Oct 1989
4877767 Liang et al. Oct 1989
4912080 Weinstein Mar 1990
4935401 Pendergrass, jr. Jun 1990
4938507 Ashby et al. Jul 1990
4947343 Amari Aug 1990
4957380 Gerstle et al. Sep 1990
4959343 Weinstein Sep 1990
4970193 Liang et al. Nov 1990
4974035 Rabb et al. Nov 1990
4977060 Liang et al. Dec 1990
4977131 Macaulay Dec 1990
4996184 Bevan et al. Feb 1991
5002311 Brunjes Mar 1991
5004271 Piatt Apr 1991
5039652 Doll et al. Aug 1991
5127879 Schubert Jul 1992
5135437 Schubert Aug 1992
5137494 Schubert et al. Aug 1992
5154668 Schubert Oct 1992
5173080 Longtin Dec 1992
5197922 Schubert Mar 1993
5203739 Neubauer Apr 1993
5224897 Linden et al. Jul 1993
5248279 Linden et al. Sep 1993
5248280 Lockwood Sep 1993
5393265 Linden et al. Feb 1995
5395288 Linden et al. Mar 1995
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
549442 Apr 1932 DE
613658 Mar 1926 FR
1347807 Feb 1974 GB
2085359 Apr 1982 GB
083-104008 Aug 1983 JP
128558 Feb 1962 NZ
128915 Mar 1964 NZ
185282 Nov 1980 NZ
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
Black Clawson Brochure.
“Flip-N-Rite”, 7-page instructions by Gary Thompson.
FORM Magazine, Feb., 1989, pp. 74-80.
Business Forms Labels & Systems, Jul. 1990, p. 48.
“Pressure Sensitive Papers”, Project 2558, No. 222, TAPPI Coating Committee, 1965. (copy filed previously).
“Pressure Sensitive Papers”, Project 2558, TAPPI Coating Committee, Dec., 1967. (copy filed previously).
Facsimiles of BH Medical, MAP Phone Message, Moore Two-Way Rite, St. Vincent Medical Center, Maybelline and Hartz Mountain forms.
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 07/591781 Oct 1990 US
Child 08/808847 US
Parent 07/484686 Feb 1990 US
Child 07/723690 US
Continuation in Parts (8)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/126538 Sep 1993 US
Child 08/395509 US
Parent 08/077290 Jun 1993 US
Child 08/126538 US
Parent 07/497219 Mar 1990 US
Child 07/591781 US
Parent 07/494565 Mar 1990 US
Child 07/497219 US
Parent 07/436189 Nov 1989 US
Child 07/494565 US
Parent 07/334183 US
Child 07/436189 US
Parent 07/723690 Jun 1991 US
Child 08/808847 US
Parent 07/436189 US
Child 07/484686 US